Three plague pandemics plus several epidemics have ravaged the world. The three pandemics were characterised by the role shipping played in spreading of the plague. The third pandemic, which began in southern China in the 1850s, was carried out of Hong Kong in 1894 to all continents by steamships. The oldest known documents mentioning quarantine as a precaution against epidemics dates back to 1127 in Venice. During the second pandemic, the Black Death, quarantine was systematised. During the third pandemic gassing of the ships was introduced by burning sulphur. Later hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide and other toxic gasses have been applied. In many harbours the use of rat shields were made compulsory in the beginning of the 20th century. The French bacteriologist Alexandre Emile Jean Yersin isolated in 1894 and identified Yersinia pestis as the contagious agent in Hong Kong despite obstructions from the British authorities who favoured Shibasaburo Kitasato from Japan. Four years later the French scientist Paul-Louis Simond established the rat flee, Xenopsylla cheopis, as the vector transferring the bacteria from rats to humans. This discovery was, however, not recognized until 1903 and another five years passed until clinical consequences were taken during the plague epidemic in India 1908. Each pandemic lasted several centuries due to reintroduction of Y pestis from local reservoirs in rodent populations in addition to reintroduction from the original Asiatic reservoirs.
三次瘟疫大流行加上几次流行病肆虐世界。这三次大流行的特点是航运在瘟疫传播中所起的作用。第三次大流行始于19世纪50年代的中国南方,于1894年由蒸汽船从香港传播到各大洲。已知最早的将检疫作为预防传染病的文献可以追溯到1127年的威尼斯。在第二次大流行黑死病期间,隔离是系统化的。在第三次大流行期间,通过燃烧硫磺对船只施放毒气。后来,氰化氢、一氧化碳和其他有毒气体被应用。在20世纪初,许多港口强制使用防鼠盾。法国细菌学家亚历山大·埃米尔·让·耶尔辛(Alexandre Emile Jean Yersin)于1894年分离出鼠疫杆菌,并确定鼠疫杆菌是香港的传染性病原体,尽管英国当局对来自日本的北中柴三郎(Shibasaburo Kitasato)加以阻挠。四年后,法国科学家保罗-路易斯·西蒙德(Paul-Louis Simond)建立了鼠蚤——非洲鼠爪虫(Xenopsylla cheopis),作为将细菌从老鼠传染给人类的载体。然而,这一发现直到1903年才得到承认,又过了五年,直到1908年印度鼠疫流行期间取得临床结果。每次大流行都持续了几个世纪,原因是鼠疫杆菌除了从原来的亚洲宿主重新传入外,还从当地宿主重新传入啮齿动物种群。
{"title":"Plague, rats, and ships The realisation of the infection routes of plague.","authors":"Ole Sonne","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three plague pandemics plus several epidemics have ravaged the world. The three pandemics were characterised by the role shipping played in spreading of the plague. The third pandemic, which began in southern China in the 1850s, was carried out of Hong Kong in 1894 to all continents by steamships. The oldest known documents mentioning quarantine as a precaution against epidemics dates back to 1127 in Venice. During the second pandemic, the Black Death, quarantine was systematised. During the third pandemic gassing of the ships was introduced by burning sulphur. Later hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide and other toxic gasses have been applied. In many harbours the use of rat shields were made compulsory in the beginning of the 20th century. The French bacteriologist Alexandre Emile Jean Yersin isolated in 1894 and identified Yersinia pestis as the contagious agent in Hong Kong despite obstructions from the British authorities who favoured Shibasaburo Kitasato from Japan. Four years later the French scientist Paul-Louis Simond established the rat flee, Xenopsylla cheopis, as the vector transferring the bacteria from rats to humans. This discovery was, however, not recognized until 1903 and another five years passed until clinical consequences were taken during the plague epidemic in India 1908. Each pandemic lasted several centuries due to reintroduction of Y pestis from local reservoirs in rodent populations in addition to reintroduction from the original Asiatic reservoirs.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"44 ","pages":"101-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36077849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Henrik Permin, Svend Norn, Edith Kruse, Poul R Kruse
How and when the medical value of Cinchona bark was discovered is obscure, but it is said that the powder was given to a European for malaria for the first time in the 1630s. The bark was brought to Europe by Spanish missionaries and it was recommended by the cardinal Juan de Lugo. In the 1660s, the use of Cinchona bark became known in England - and in Denmark by Thomas Bartholin. It was used for the treatment of malaria, but several debates on its value continued up to the 1730s. However, successful treatment of malaria was obtained by Thomas Sydenham, Robert Tabor and Francesco Torti. Sydenham emphasized a modern view that Cinchona bark was a unique specific drug for the treatment of malaria, and the treatment was fully accepted when Torti's Therapeutice specialis appeared. In the early 18th century, botanical expeditions were arranged in search of the most valuable Cinchona species for cultivation. The content of quinine was impor- tant, and determination of quinine was realized when Pierre Pelletier and Joseph Caventou isolated the alkaloid from the bark in 1820. Dutch plantations and quinine industry dominated the market, but the supply of quinine came to an end when the Japanese occupied Indonesia in 1942, cutting off the rest of the world from the main supplies of Cinchona. Synthetic antimalarials were developed and chloroquine became the drug of choice, but the intensive use of these drugs caused drug resistance. Chloroquine-resistant strains of P. falciparum are now treated with other drugs as artemisinin and artemether.
{"title":"On the history of Cinchona bark in the treatment of Malaria.","authors":"Henrik Permin, Svend Norn, Edith Kruse, Poul R Kruse","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How and when the medical value of Cinchona bark was discovered is obscure, but it is said that the powder was given to a European for malaria for the first time in the 1630s. The bark was brought to Europe by Spanish missionaries and it was recommended by the cardinal Juan de Lugo. In the 1660s, the use of Cinchona bark became known in England - and in Denmark by Thomas Bartholin. It was used for the treatment of malaria, but several debates on its value continued up to the 1730s. However, successful treatment of malaria was obtained by Thomas Sydenham, Robert Tabor and Francesco Torti. Sydenham emphasized a modern view that Cinchona bark was a unique specific drug for the treatment of malaria, and the treatment was fully accepted when Torti's Therapeutice specialis appeared. In the early 18th century, botanical expeditions were arranged in search of the most valuable Cinchona species for cultivation. The content of quinine was impor- tant, and determination of quinine was realized when Pierre Pelletier and Joseph Caventou isolated the alkaloid from the bark in 1820. Dutch plantations and quinine industry dominated the market, but the supply of quinine came to an end when the Japanese occupied Indonesia in 1942, cutting off the rest of the world from the main supplies of Cinchona. Synthetic antimalarials were developed and chloroquine became the drug of choice, but the intensive use of these drugs caused drug resistance. Chloroquine-resistant strains of P. falciparum are now treated with other drugs as artemisinin and artemether.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"44 ","pages":"9-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36078880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
René T.H. Laënnec was the man who designed the first monaural instrument for mediate auscultation. The invention became a medical breakthrough. An instrument capable of enhancing the subtle sounds created by the human heart and lungs. This evolutionary instrument also had the benefit of decreasing the oftentim s too direct bodily contact between the doctor and the patient. Laënnec carefully described the different sounds created by the human organs and attempted to link them to the post mortem findings. Even though many doctors were enthusiastic regarding this new medical breakthrough, the stethoscope also had its opponents, but John Forbes' English translation of Laënnec's De l'auscultation midiate as well as William Stokes' treatise on the use of the stethoscope spread the news to the medical world. In Denmark the stethoscope was introduced by Oluf Lundt Bang, S.M. Trier and E. Hornemann. The next step forward was the develop- ment of the binaural stethoscope by G.P. Camman in New York. The Littmann Electronic Stethoscope (3M Health Care) created by David Littmann is considered the leading product globally in this medical field. Digitization, ultrasound and Doppler effect, as well as 2D and 3D printing, are evidence of an on-going evolution within this field of medical equipment as we get ready to celebrate the stethoscopes 200th anniversary.
{"title":"The stethoscope - A 200th anniversary.","authors":"Henrik Permin, Svend Norn","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>René T.H. Laënnec was the man who designed the first monaural instrument for mediate auscultation. The invention became a medical breakthrough. An instrument capable of enhancing the subtle sounds created by the human heart and lungs. This evolutionary instrument also had the benefit of decreasing the oftentim s too direct bodily contact between the doctor and the patient. Laënnec carefully described the different sounds created by the human organs and attempted to link them to the post mortem findings. Even though many doctors were enthusiastic regarding this new medical breakthrough, the stethoscope also had its opponents, but John Forbes' English translation of Laënnec's De l'auscultation midiate as well as William Stokes' treatise on the use of the stethoscope spread the news to the medical world. In Denmark the stethoscope was introduced by Oluf Lundt Bang, S.M. Trier and E. Hornemann. The next step forward was the develop- ment of the binaural stethoscope by G.P. Camman in New York. The Littmann Electronic Stethoscope (3M Health Care) created by David Littmann is considered the leading product globally in this medical field. Digitization, ultrasound and Doppler effect, as well as 2D and 3D printing, are evidence of an on-going evolution within this field of medical equipment as we get ready to celebrate the stethoscopes 200th anniversary.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"44 ","pages":"85-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36077848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hans Jacob Schou (1887-1952) was a well-educated Danish specialist in nervous diseases. He was persuaded in 1922 to take over the leadership of the only large scale private institution in Denmark for patients with nervous diseases, The Colony of Philadelphia, near Dianalund, on the island of Zealand. He pioneered a development of this conservative institution into a modern charity hospital for patients with all kinds of nervous and mental disorders. His newly erected sanatorium (1928) for neurotic patients came to symbolize the need for inclusion of all patients - disregarding the seriousness of their illness and disregarding their social status - in the realm of Danish psychiatry. Thus, Schou created the foundations for modern Danish psychiatry.
汉斯·雅各布·绍(Hans Jacob Schou, 1887-1952)是一位受过良好教育的丹麦神经疾病专家。1922年,他被说服接管了丹麦唯一一家为神经疾病患者服务的大型私人机构——位于西兰岛Dianalund附近的费城殖民地——的领导职务。他率先将这个保守的机构发展成为一个现代化的慈善医院,为患有各种神经和精神疾病的患者提供服务。他为神经症患者新建的疗养院(1928年)象征着在丹麦精神病学领域包容所有患者的需要——不管他们的疾病的严重性,也不管他们的社会地位。因此,Schou为现代丹麦精神病学奠定了基础。
{"title":"The birth of modern psychiatry - Hans Jacob Schou and the Dianalund Sanatorium.","authors":"Per Vestergaard","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hans Jacob Schou (1887-1952) was a well-educated Danish specialist in nervous diseases. He was persuaded in 1922 to take over the leadership of the only large scale private institution in Denmark for patients with nervous diseases, The Colony of Philadelphia, near Dianalund, on the island of Zealand. He pioneered a development of this conservative institution into a modern charity hospital for patients with all kinds of nervous and mental disorders. His newly erected sanatorium (1928) for neurotic patients came to symbolize the need for inclusion of all patients - disregarding the seriousness of their illness and disregarding their social status - in the realm of Danish psychiatry. Thus, Schou created the foundations for modern Danish psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"44 ","pages":"135-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36077851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
At the end of the eighteenth century a scientific basis for medicine was called for. The Scottish physician John Brown proposed an all-comprising medical system in 1780. A surplus or lack of stimulating factors, the prime movers of life according to Brown, was supposed to explain all diseases and indicate their treatment. Individuals only subjected to a small degree of stimulation became affected by "asthenic diseases" which were the most frequent diseases. They should be treated with abundant food and wine, supplemented with camphor, opium, or other drugs considered to be stimulating. Conversely, individuals with "sthenic diseases" should reduce their intake of food and beverage. Brown's system was received with transient approval by some Danish physicians from the late 1790s. But it soon proved to be of no value in medical practice, and its success dwindled within academic medicine around 1814. On the other hand, it seemed to generate new ideas. It became linked with the German Romantic Movement and "Naturphilosophie." The widespread use of camphor and opium in both academic and folk medicine, continued throughout the nine- teenth century and into the twentieth century.
{"title":"John Brown's system of medicine and its introduction in Denmark around 1800.","authors":"Sven Erik Hansen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the end of the eighteenth century a scientific basis for medicine was called for. The Scottish physician John Brown proposed an all-comprising medical system in 1780. A surplus or lack of stimulating factors, the prime movers of life according to Brown, was supposed to explain all diseases and indicate their treatment. Individuals only subjected to a small degree of stimulation became affected by \"asthenic diseases\" which were the most frequent diseases. They should be treated with abundant food and wine, supplemented with camphor, opium, or other drugs considered to be stimulating. Conversely, individuals with \"sthenic diseases\" should reduce their intake of food and beverage. Brown's system was received with transient approval by some Danish physicians from the late 1790s. But it soon proved to be of no value in medical practice, and its success dwindled within academic medicine around 1814. On the other hand, it seemed to generate new ideas. It became linked with the German Romantic Movement and \"Naturphilosophie.\" The widespread use of camphor and opium in both academic and folk medicine, continued throughout the nine- teenth century and into the twentieth century.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"44 ","pages":"31-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36078881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Svend Norn, Henrik Permin, Edith Kruse, Poul R Kruse
Throughout the history of humanity, numerous therapeutic agents have been employed for their sedative and hypnotic properties such as opium, henbane (Hyoscyamus niger) and deadly nightshade (Atropa belladonna), but also alcohol and wine. In the 19th century potassium bromide was introduced as a sedative - and antiepileptic drug and chloral hydrate as sedative-hypnotics. A new era was reached by the introduction of barbiturates. The story started with the chemist Adolf von Baeyer. His breakthrough in the synthesis of new agents as barbituric acid and indigo and his education of young chemists was of great importance for the science of organic chemistry and the development of the dye and medicine industry in the late 19th century. The next important step was the development of barbiturates. The pioneers were Josef von Mering and Emil Fischer. Using the Grimaux-method they synthesized various barbiturates. It was von Mering who got the idea of introducing ethyl groups in the inactive barbituric acid to obtain sedatives, but the synthesis was succeeded by the chemist Emil Fischer. Experiments with dogs clearly showed sedative and hypnotic effect of the barbiturates and the oral administration of barbital (Veronal) confirmed the effect in humans. Barbital was commercialized in 1903 and in 1911 phenobarbital (Luminal) was introduced in the clinic, and this drug showed hypnotic and antiepileptic effects. Thereafter a lot of new barbiturates appeared. Dangerous properties of the drugs were recognized as abuse, addiction, and poisoning. An optimum treatment of acute barbiturate intoxication was obtained by the "Scandinavian method", which was developed in the Poison Centre of the Bispebjerg Hospital in Copenhagen. The centre was established by Carl Clemmesen in 1949 and the intensive care treatment reduced the mortality of the admitted persons from 20% to less than 2%. To-day only a few barbiturates are used in connection with anaesthesia and for the treatment of epilepsy, and chemists are focusing on drugs with more selective effects.
{"title":"[On the history of barbiturates].","authors":"Svend Norn, Henrik Permin, Edith Kruse, Poul R Kruse","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Throughout the history of humanity, numerous therapeutic agents have been employed for their sedative and hypnotic properties such as opium, henbane (Hyoscyamus niger) and deadly nightshade (Atropa belladonna), but also alcohol and wine. In the 19th century potassium bromide was introduced as a sedative - and antiepileptic drug and chloral hydrate as sedative-hypnotics. A new era was reached by the introduction of barbiturates. The story started with the chemist Adolf von Baeyer. His breakthrough in the synthesis of new agents as barbituric acid and indigo and his education of young chemists was of great importance for the science of organic chemistry and the development of the dye and medicine industry in the late 19th century. The next important step was the development of barbiturates. The pioneers were Josef von Mering and Emil Fischer. Using the Grimaux-method they synthesized various barbiturates. It was von Mering who got the idea of introducing ethyl groups in the inactive barbituric acid to obtain sedatives, but the synthesis was succeeded by the chemist Emil Fischer. Experiments with dogs clearly showed sedative and hypnotic effect of the barbiturates and the oral administration of barbital (Veronal) confirmed the effect in humans. Barbital was commercialized in 1903 and in 1911 phenobarbital (Luminal) was introduced in the clinic, and this drug showed hypnotic and antiepileptic effects. Thereafter a lot of new barbiturates appeared. Dangerous properties of the drugs were recognized as abuse, addiction, and poisoning. An optimum treatment of acute barbiturate intoxication was obtained by the \"Scandinavian method\", which was developed in the Poison Centre of the Bispebjerg Hospital in Copenhagen. The centre was established by Carl Clemmesen in 1949 and the intensive care treatment reduced the mortality of the admitted persons from 20% to less than 2%. To-day only a few barbiturates are used in connection with anaesthesia and for the treatment of epilepsy, and chemists are focusing on drugs with more selective effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"43 ","pages":"133-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34409766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A birth with fatal outcome for both the mother and the foetus was reported in the Danish medical journal, Bibliothek for Læger in 1868. Here, the article with its two illustrations is summarised because of the vivid description of the course together with the therapeutic considerations expressed by the obstetrician. Due to an earlier osteomyelitis the pregnant woman's spine was deformed and her pelvis was narrowed. The birth came to a standstill, and it became necessary to reduce the circumference of the foetus' cranium by perforation, after which the dead foetus could be delivered. The woman died of infection some days later. Afterwards her deformed lumbar spine and pelvis was removed, preserved and depicted in two lithographs. The preserved pelvis is still extant in the Saxtorphian obstetric collection in Medical Museion, Copenhagen.
1868年,丹麦医学杂志《Bibliothek for Læger》报道了一个对母亲和胎儿都造成致命后果的分娩。在这里,文章与它的两个插图是总结,因为生动的描述过程与治疗考虑由产科医生表示。由于早期的骨髓炎,孕妇的脊柱变形,骨盆变窄。分娩停止了,有必要通过穿孔来缩小胎儿头盖骨的周长,然后死亡的胎儿才能分娩。几天后,这名妇女死于感染。之后,她畸形的腰椎和骨盆被切除,保存下来,并在两幅石版画中描绘出来。保存的骨盆仍然存在于哥本哈根医学博物馆的萨克斯托尔芬产科收藏中。
{"title":"[A birth with fatal outcome in 1866].","authors":"Sven Erik Hansen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A birth with fatal outcome for both the mother and the foetus was reported in the Danish medical journal, Bibliothek for Læger in 1868. Here, the article with its two illustrations is summarised because of the vivid description of the course together with the therapeutic considerations expressed by the obstetrician. Due to an earlier osteomyelitis the pregnant woman's spine was deformed and her pelvis was narrowed. The birth came to a standstill, and it became necessary to reduce the circumference of the foetus' cranium by perforation, after which the dead foetus could be delivered. The woman died of infection some days later. Afterwards her deformed lumbar spine and pelvis was removed, preserved and depicted in two lithographs. The preserved pelvis is still extant in the Saxtorphian obstetric collection in Medical Museion, Copenhagen.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"43 ","pages":"101-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34409294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bernard Jeune, Søren Hess, Axel Skytthe, Therkel Stræde
On February 20, 1945, during the German occupation of Denmark, members of a notorious Nazi terror organization named the Petergroup murdered four young medical doctors at the city and regional hospital of Odense. On the 70th anniversary of the crime, a symposium was organized at the Odense University Hospital, and a monument revealed close to the site of the murders in commemoration of the four victims of the crime. The young physicians were not known to be connected with the Danish resistance, and they were shot without their murderers even knowing their identities in an attempt to revenge the growing resistance in Denmark's central, third largest city, and as a reprisal for several cases where the hospital had treated wounded resistance fighters, and prevented their being handed over to the German police. The article describes the terror action of February 20, 1945 and its perpetrators, as well as other Nazi attacks on members of the Danish medical profession. It lines out the strong protest voiced by the Danish central administration against the Odense hospital killings which were on the very same day seconded by further killings and a German campaign of blowing up important Odense buildings including two newspaper printing houses. Conclusively, the authors - by way of obituaries and material from relatives of the murdered - portray the four victims of the atrocity Christian Fabricius Møller, Jørgen Hvalkof, Henning Magnus Adelsteen Dalsgaard, and Henning Ørsberg.
1945年2月20日,在德国占领丹麦期间,臭名昭著的纳粹恐怖组织“彼得集团”的成员在欧登塞市和地区医院谋杀了四名年轻的医生。在犯罪70周年之际,在欧登塞大学医院举办了研讨会,并在谋杀现场附近建立了一座纪念碑,以纪念犯罪的四名受害者。据了解,这些年轻的医生与丹麦抵抗运动没有关系,他们被枪杀时,凶手甚至不知道他们的身份,这是为了报复丹麦中部第三大城市日益增长的抵抗运动,也是为了报复医院治疗抵抗运动受伤战士的几起案件,并阻止他们被移交给德国警方。这篇文章描述了1945年2月20日的恐怖行动及其肇事者,以及纳粹对丹麦医务人员的其他袭击。它阐明了丹麦中央行政当局对欧登塞医院杀人事件所表达的强烈抗议,这些事件发生在同一天,随后又发生了进一步的杀人事件,德国还炸毁了欧登塞的重要建筑,包括两座报纸印刷厂。最后,作者通过讣告和来自被谋杀者亲属的材料,描绘了暴行的四名受害者:Christian Fabricius Møller, Jørgen Hvalkof, Henning Magnus Adelsteen Dalsgaard和Henning Ørsberg。
{"title":"[Nazi Terror against the Danish Medical Profession. The February 20, 1945 Murders in Odense].","authors":"Bernard Jeune, Søren Hess, Axel Skytthe, Therkel Stræde","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On February 20, 1945, during the German occupation of Denmark, members of a notorious Nazi terror organization named the Petergroup murdered four young medical doctors at the city and regional hospital of Odense. On the 70th anniversary of the crime, a symposium was organized at the Odense University Hospital, and a monument revealed close to the site of the murders in commemoration of the four victims of the crime. The young physicians were not known to be connected with the Danish resistance, and they were shot without their murderers even knowing their identities in an attempt to revenge the growing resistance in Denmark's central, third largest city, and as a reprisal for several cases where the hospital had treated wounded resistance fighters, and prevented their being handed over to the German police. The article describes the terror action of February 20, 1945 and its perpetrators, as well as other Nazi attacks on members of the Danish medical profession. It lines out the strong protest voiced by the Danish central administration against the Odense hospital killings which were on the very same day seconded by further killings and a German campaign of blowing up important Odense buildings including two newspaper printing houses. Conclusively, the authors - by way of obituaries and material from relatives of the murdered - portray the four victims of the atrocity Christian Fabricius Møller, Jørgen Hvalkof, Henning Magnus Adelsteen Dalsgaard, and Henning Ørsberg.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"43 ","pages":"153-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34310702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The two Hippocratic texts, Aphorisms and Epidemics III, have not been translated into Danish previously. The Aphorisms are 412 short, pithy statements, mostly on the prognosis in relation to certain symptoms in the course of the diseases, very often febrile. The Aphorisms begin with the famous words: "Life is short, the Art long, opportunity fleeting, experiment treacherous, judgment difficult." (Transl. W H S Jones [22]). Epidemics III consists of 28 case histories, again mostly of febrile patients, but also of observations on the connection of the seasons with general morbidity and mortality. The author describes an epidemic, which in some respects resembles Thucydides' report on the plague in Athens in 430 BC. It is suggested, that observations as have been recorded in the seven Hippocratic texts on epidemic diseases are the material on which prognostic statements as those collected in the Aphorisms are founded.
希波克拉底的两本著作《警句》和《流行病III》之前还没有被翻译成丹麦语。这些格言是412条短小精悍的陈述,主要是关于疾病过程中某些症状的预测,通常是发热。《格言》以这句名言开头:“生命短暂,艺术长久,机会稍即,实验不可靠,判断困难。”(Transl。W H S Jones[22])。流行病III包括28个病例史,大多数是发热病人,但也有关于季节与一般发病率和死亡率之间关系的观察。作者描述了一场流行病,在某些方面类似于修昔底德对公元前430年雅典瘟疫的报告。有人认为,在希波克拉底关于流行病的七篇文章中记录的观察结果是《格言》中收集的预言陈述的基础。
{"title":"[Hippocrates. Aphorisms and Epidemics III. Two clinical texts].","authors":"Anders Frøland","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The two Hippocratic texts, Aphorisms and Epidemics III, have not been translated into Danish previously. The Aphorisms are 412 short, pithy statements, mostly on the prognosis in relation to certain symptoms in the course of the diseases, very often febrile. The Aphorisms begin with the famous words: \"Life is short, the Art long, opportunity fleeting, experiment treacherous, judgment difficult.\" (Transl. W H S Jones [22]). Epidemics III consists of 28 case histories, again mostly of febrile patients, but also of observations on the connection of the seasons with general morbidity and mortality. The author describes an epidemic, which in some respects resembles Thucydides' report on the plague in Athens in 430 BC. It is suggested, that observations as have been recorded in the seven Hippocratic texts on epidemic diseases are the material on which prognostic statements as those collected in the Aphorisms are founded.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"Suppl ","pages":"7-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34401856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ole H. Mynster (1772-1818) was a stepson of the leading physician at the Royal Frederik Hospital in Copenhagen. At an early age he became fond of zoology and mineralogy. He created "societies" in Enlightenment-style for boys and young people with lectures and collections. Later on a circle of talented young students, scientists and poets met in his small room at the hospital. Some of them with Ole Mynster as the head set up a modern scientific journal, Physicalsk, oeconomisk og medicochirurgisk Bibliotek for Danmark og Norge which encouraged the introduction of antiphlogistic chemistry. Ole Mynster became physician at the Royal Frederik Hospital and lecturer in clinical pharmacology. He wrote the first book in Danish on pharmacology based upon chemistry. In their memoirs, prominent members of his circle have told about him, and his son F.L. Mynster has written a draft for a biography. An overview of the activities within natural science and medicine of the young Ole Hieronymus Mynster is presented.
{"title":"[\"The Society for letters and natural science\" The young Ole H. Mynster and the chemical revolution around 1800].","authors":"Sven Erik Hansen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ole H. Mynster (1772-1818) was a stepson of the leading physician at the Royal Frederik Hospital in Copenhagen. At an early age he became fond of zoology and mineralogy. He created \"societies\" in Enlightenment-style for boys and young people with lectures and collections. Later on a circle of talented young students, scientists and poets met in his small room at the hospital. Some of them with Ole Mynster as the head set up a modern scientific journal, Physicalsk, oeconomisk og medicochirurgisk Bibliotek for Danmark og Norge which encouraged the introduction of antiphlogistic chemistry. Ole Mynster became physician at the Royal Frederik Hospital and lecturer in clinical pharmacology. He wrote the first book in Danish on pharmacology based upon chemistry. In their memoirs, prominent members of his circle have told about him, and his son F.L. Mynster has written a draft for a biography. An overview of the activities within natural science and medicine of the young Ole Hieronymus Mynster is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"43 ","pages":"9-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34409290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}