Annual review of immunology最新文献

The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 infections at a global level reflects the repeated emergence of variant strains encoding unique constellations of mutations. These variants have been generated principally because of a dynamic host immune landscape, the countermeasures deployed to combat disease, and selection for enhanced infection of the upper airway and respiratory transmission. The resulting viral diversity creates a challenge for vaccination efforts to maintain efficacy, especially regarding humoral aspects of protection. Here, we review our understanding of how SARS-CoV-2 has evolved during the pandemic, the immune mechanisms that confer protection, and the impact viral evolution has had on transmissibility and adaptive immunity elicited by natural infection and/or vaccination. Evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 evolution initially selected variants with increased transmissibility but currently is driven by immune escape. The virus likely will continue to drift to maintain fitness until countermeasures capable of disrupting transmission cycles become widely available.

For decades, scientists have relied on traditional animal models to study viral infection and the immune response. However, these models have limitations, and the search for more accurate and reliable ways to study the human-pathogen interphase has led to the development of humanized mouse systems. These revolutionary models have transformed how we understand viral infection and the human immune system's interactions with viruses to control or exacerbate disease. They are also paving the way for new treatments and therapies. In this article, we explore the history and development of humanized mouse systems and their advantages, limitations, and applications in viral immunology research. We describe the different types of humanized mouse models, including their generation and utility for studying human pathogens, with an emphasis on human-specific viruses. In addition, we discuss areas for further refinement and future applications.

Pneumonia is an acute respiratory infection of the lower respiratory tract. The effectiveness of the host immune response determines the severity of infection, or whether pneumonia occurs at all. The lungs house both innate and adaptive immune systems, which integrate their activities to provide host defense that eliminates microbes and prevents lower respiratory infection from becoming severe. Professional immune cells in the lung, like macrophages and lymphocytes, work with lung constituents, like epithelial cells and fibroblasts, to optimize antimicrobial defense. The dynamics of the immune response during infection and the immune components contributing to defense are influenced by prior experiences with respiratory pathogens, remodeling lung immunity in ways that improve responses against subsequent infections. This review covers how innate and adaptive immune activities coordinate inside the lung to provide integrated and effective immune resistance against respiratory pathogens.

The central nervous system (CNS) has a unique set of macrophages that seed the tissue early during embryonic development. Microglia reside in the parenchyma, and border-associated macrophages are present in border regions, including the meninges, perivascular spaces, and choroid plexus. CNS-resident macrophages support brain homeostasis during development and steady state. In the diseased brain, however, the immune landscape is altered, with phenotypic and transcriptional changes in resident macrophages and the invasion of blood-borne monocytes, which differentiate into monocyte-derived macrophages upon entering the CNS. In this review, we focus on the fate and function of the macrophage compartment in health, neurodegenerative conditions such as amyloidosis, and neuroinflammation as observed in multiple sclerosis and infection. We discuss our current understanding that monocyte-derived macrophages contribute to neuropathology whereas native macrophages play a neuroprotective role in disease.

Effective bidirectional communication between the innate and adaptive immune systems is crucial for tissue homeostasis and protective immunity against infections. The innate immune system is responsible for the early sensing of and initial response to threats, including microbial ligands, toxins, and tissue damage. Pathogen-related information, detected primarily by the innate immune system via dendritic cells, is relayed to adaptive immune cells, leading to the priming and differentiation of naive T cells into effector and memory lineages. Memory T cells that persist long after pathogen clearance are integral for durable protective immunity. In addition to rapidly responding to reinfections, memory T cells also directly instruct the interacting myeloid cells to induce innate inflammation, which resembles microbial inflammation. As such, memory T cells act as newly emerging activators of the innate immune system and function independently of direct microbial recognition. While T cell-mediated activation of the innate immune system likely evolved as a protective mechanism to combat reinfections by virulent pathogens, the detrimental outcomes of this mechanism manifest in the forms of autoimmunity and other T cell-driven pathologies. Here, we review the complexities and layers of regulation at the interface between the innate and adaptive immune systems to highlight the implications of adaptive instruction of innate immunity in health and disease.

I have spent more than the last 40 years at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), studying T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. I was blessed with supportive mentors, an exceptionally talented group of trainees, and wonderful collaborators and colleagues during my journey who have enabled me to make significant contributions to our understanding of how the TCR initiates signaling. TCR signaling events contribute to T cell development as well as to mature T cell activation and differentiation.

Barrier tissues are highly innervated by sensory and autonomic nerves that are positioned in close proximity to both stromal and immune cell populations. Together with a growing awareness of the far-reaching consequences of neuroimmune interactions, recent studies have uncovered key mechanisms through which they contribute to organ homeostasis and immunity. It has also become clear that dysregulation of such interactions is implicated in the development of chronic lung diseases. This review describes the characteristics of the lung nervous system and discusses the molecular mechanisms that underlie lung neuroimmune interactions in infection and disease. We have contextualized the current literature and identified opportune areas for further investigation. Indeed, both the lung-brain axis and local neuroimmune interactions hold enormous potential for the exploration and development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting lung diseases.

Circadian rhythms of approximately 24 h have emerged as important modulators of the immune system. These oscillations are important for mounting short-term, innate immune responses, but surprisingly also long-term, adaptive immune responses. Recent data indicate that they play a central role in antitumor immunity, in both mice and humans. In this review, we discuss the evolving literature on circadian antitumor immune responses and the underlying mechanisms that control them. We further provide an overview of circadian treatment regimens-chrono-immunotherapies-that harness time-of-day differences in immunity for optimal efficacy. Our aim is to provide an overview for researchers and clinicians alike, for a better understanding of the circadian immune system and how to best harness it for chronotherapeutic interventions. This knowledge is important for a better understanding of immune responses per se and could revolutionize the way we approach the treatment of cancer and a range of other diseases, ultimately improving clinical practice.

The immune system and the kidneys are closely related. Immune components mediate acute kidney disease and are crucial to the progression of chronic kidney disease. Beyond its pathogenic functions, the immune system supports immunological homeostasis in healthy kidneys. The kidneys help maintain immune equilibrium by removing metabolic waste products and toxins, thereby limiting local and systemic inflammation. In this review, we describe the close relationship between the immune system and the kidneys. We discuss how the imbalance in the immune response can be deleterious to the kidneys and how immunomodulation can be important in preventing end-stage renal disease. In addition, recent tools such as in silico platforms and kidney organoids can help unveil the relationship between immune cells and kidney homeostasis.

The intestine is the largest peripheral lymphoid organ in animals, including humans, and interacts with a vast array of microorganisms called the gut microbiota. Comprehending the symbiotic relationship between the gut microbiota and our immune system is essential not only for the field of immunology but also for understanding the pathogenesis of various systemic diseases, including cancer, cardiometabolic disorders, and extraintestinal autoimmune conditions. Whereas microbe-derived antigens are crucial for activating the intestinal immune system, particularly T and B cells, as environmental cues, microbes and their metabolites play a critical role in directing the differentiation of these immune cells. Microbial metabolites are regarded as messengers from the gut microbiota, since bacteria have the ability to produce unique molecules that humans cannot, and many immune cells in the intestine express receptors for these molecules. This review highlights the distinct relationships between microbial metabolites and the differentiation and function of the immune system.