Pub Date : 2024-09-20DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499
Blessing Nyakutsikwa, Peter James Taylor, Keith Hawton, Rob Poole, Manjula Weerasinghe, Kalpani Dissanayake, Sandamali Rajapakshe, Pramila Hashini, Michael Eddleston, Flemming Konradsen, Peter Huxley, Catherine Robinson, Melissa Pearson
Objective: Socioeconomic status deprivation is known to be associated with self-harm in Western countries but there is less information about this association in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). One way of investigating this is to assess the prevalence of indicators of financial stress in people who self-harm. We have assessed the prevalence and correlates of day-to-day financial hardships amongst individual presenting with non-fatal self-harm to hospitals in Sri Lanka.
Methods: Data on non-fatal self-harm presentations were collected from an ongoing surveillance project in 52 hospitals in Sri Lanka. A questionnaire captured data on two forms of financial stress: unmet need (i.e., costs and bills that cannot be paid) and required support (i.e., steps taken to cover costs, such as selling belongings). Additional data on demographic, economic and clinical characteristics were also collected.
Results: The sample included 2516 individuals. Both forms of financial stress were very common, with pawning/selling items (47%) and asking family or friends for money (46%) in order to pay bills or cover costs being commonly reported. Greater financial stress was associated with being aged 26-55 years, limited education, and low socioeconomic position. Financial stress was greater in women than men after adjusting for other factors.
Conclusion: The results indicate that financial stress is commonly reported amongst individuals presenting to hospital with non-fatal self-harm in Sri Lanka, especially women. The research highlights a need to attend to financial stress both within self-harm prevention and aftercare.
{"title":"Financial Stress Amongst People Who Self-Harm in Sri Lanka.","authors":"Blessing Nyakutsikwa, Peter James Taylor, Keith Hawton, Rob Poole, Manjula Weerasinghe, Kalpani Dissanayake, Sandamali Rajapakshe, Pramila Hashini, Michael Eddleston, Flemming Konradsen, Peter Huxley, Catherine Robinson, Melissa Pearson","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Socioeconomic status deprivation is known to be associated with self-harm in Western countries but there is less information about this association in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). One way of investigating this is to assess the prevalence of indicators of financial stress in people who self-harm. We have assessed the prevalence and correlates of day-to-day financial hardships amongst individual presenting with non-fatal self-harm to hospitals in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on non-fatal self-harm presentations were collected from an ongoing surveillance project in 52 hospitals in Sri Lanka. A questionnaire captured data on two forms of financial stress: unmet need (i.e., costs and bills that cannot be paid) and required support (i.e., steps taken to cover costs, such as selling belongings). Additional data on demographic, economic and clinical characteristics were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 2516 individuals. Both forms of financial stress were very common, with pawning/selling items (47%) and asking family or friends for money (46%) in order to pay bills or cover costs being commonly reported. Greater financial stress was associated with being aged 26-55 years, limited education, and low socioeconomic position. Financial stress was greater in women than men after adjusting for other factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that financial stress is commonly reported amongst individuals presenting to hospital with non-fatal self-harm in Sri Lanka, especially women. The research highlights a need to attend to financial stress both within self-harm prevention and aftercare.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915
Laura Matheson, Susan Rasmussen, Jessamyn Moxie, Robert J Cramer
Objective: Contemporary approaches to suicide assessment and treatment incorporate reasons for living (RFL) and reasons for dying (RFD). This study qualitatively explored individuals' self-described RFL and RFD in the context of suicidal thinking and behaviors.
Method: Within a community United Kingdom (UK) sample, adults (N = 331, aged 16+) responded to eight open-ended questions probing their experiences of suicide, defeat, and entrapment. Utilizing these data, which were collected from a larger online survey examining risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors, this study explored RFL and RFD within these narratives. After the research team established an initial code book, RFL and RFD codes were subsequently analyzed through inductive and deductive thematic analyses.
Results: The present study identified five complimentary RFD-RFL themes: (1) Hopelessness-Hopefulness, (2) Stress of Responsibilities-Duty to Responsibilities, (3) Social Disconnection-Social Connection, (4) Death as Sin-Desire for an Afterlife, and (5) Temporary Escapes as Coping-Entrapment (i.e., a lack of escape). Three subthemes within the RFD theme Entrapment were General/Unspecified, By Feelings, and Within Self.
Conclusions: Identified themes reflect the existing quantitative RFL and RFD literature. The identified RFL and RFD themes are discussed with reference to their clinical applications in advancing suicide-specific assessments and interventions. We propose a dimensional framework for RFD and RFL which informs future suicidal behaviors research and practice.
{"title":"A Qualitative Assessment of Reasons for Living and Dying in the Context of Feeling Trapped Among Adults in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Laura Matheson, Susan Rasmussen, Jessamyn Moxie, Robert J Cramer","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Contemporary approaches to suicide assessment and treatment incorporate reasons for living (RFL) and reasons for dying (RFD). This study qualitatively explored individuals' self-described RFL and RFD in the context of suicidal thinking and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Within a community United Kingdom (UK) sample, adults (<i>N</i> = 331, aged 16+) responded to eight open-ended questions probing their experiences of suicide, defeat, and entrapment. Utilizing these data, which were collected from a larger online survey examining risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors, this study explored RFL and RFD within these narratives. After the research team established an initial code book, RFL and RFD codes were subsequently analyzed through inductive and deductive thematic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present study identified five complimentary RFD-RFL themes: (1) Hopelessness-Hopefulness, (2) Stress of Responsibilities-Duty to Responsibilities, (3) Social Disconnection-Social Connection, (4) Death as Sin-Desire for an Afterlife, and (5) Temporary Escapes as Coping-Entrapment (i.e., a lack of escape). Three subthemes within the RFD theme Entrapment were General/Unspecified, By Feelings, and Within Self.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identified themes reflect the existing quantitative RFL and RFD literature. The identified RFL and RFD themes are discussed with reference to their clinical applications in advancing suicide-specific assessments and interventions. We propose a dimensional framework for RFD and RFL which informs future suicidal behaviors research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-28DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676
Jennifer M Boggs, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Erica M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Arne Beck, Cambria Bruschke, Stuart Buttlaire, Karen J Coleman, Jean P Flores, Robert Penfold, J David Powers, Julie Angerhofer Richards, Laura Richardson, Arthur Runkle, Jacqueline M Ryan, Gregory E Simon, Stacy Sterling, Christine Stewart, Scott Stumbo, LeeAnn M Quintana, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Brian K Ahmedani
Objective: Safety planning for suicide prevention is an important quality metric for Zero Suicide implementation. We describe the development, validation, and application of electronic health record (EHR) programs to measure uptake of safety planning practices across six integrated healthcare systems as part of a Zero Suicide evaluation study.
Methods: Safety planning was documented in narrative notes and structured EHR templates using the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention (SBSPI) in response to a high-risk cutoff score on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics were developed and validated using chart review to characterize practices documented in narrative notes. We applied NLP to measure frequency of documentation in the narrative text and standard programming methods to examine structured SBSPI templates from 2010-2022.
Results: Chart reviews found three safety planning practices documented in narrative notes that were delivered to at least half of patients at risk: professional contacts, lethal means counseling for firearms, and lethal means counseling for medication access/storage. NLP methods were developed to identify these practices in clinical text with high levels of accuracy (Sensitivity, Specificity, & PPV ≥ 82%). Among visits with a high-risk CSSRS, 40% (Range 2-73% by health system) had an SBSPI template within 1 year of implementation.
Conclusions: This is one of the first reports describing development of measures that leverage electronic health records to track use of suicide prevention safety plans. There are opportunities to use the methods developed here in future evaluations of safety planning.
{"title":"Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation.","authors":"Jennifer M Boggs, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Erica M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Arne Beck, Cambria Bruschke, Stuart Buttlaire, Karen J Coleman, Jean P Flores, Robert Penfold, J David Powers, Julie Angerhofer Richards, Laura Richardson, Arthur Runkle, Jacqueline M Ryan, Gregory E Simon, Stacy Sterling, Christine Stewart, Scott Stumbo, LeeAnn M Quintana, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Brian K Ahmedani","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Safety planning for suicide prevention is an important quality metric for Zero Suicide implementation. We describe the development, validation, and application of electronic health record (EHR) programs to measure uptake of safety planning practices across six integrated healthcare systems as part of a Zero Suicide evaluation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Safety planning was documented in narrative notes and structured EHR templates using the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention (SBSPI) in response to a high-risk cutoff score on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics were developed and validated using chart review to characterize practices documented in narrative notes. We applied NLP to measure frequency of documentation in the narrative text and standard programming methods to examine structured SBSPI templates from 2010-2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chart reviews found three safety planning practices documented in narrative notes that were delivered to at least half of patients at risk: professional contacts, lethal means counseling for firearms, and lethal means counseling for medication access/storage. NLP methods were developed to identify these practices in clinical text with high levels of accuracy (Sensitivity, Specificity, & PPV ≥ 82%). Among visits with a high-risk CSSRS, 40% (Range 2-73% by health system) had an SBSPI template within 1 year of implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the first reports describing development of measures that leverage electronic health records to track use of suicide prevention safety plans. There are opportunities to use the methods developed here in future evaluations of safety planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293
Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Adam C Jaroszewski, Joseph S Maimone, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Erin N Kilbury, Michelle B Stein, Stuart Beck, Jeff C Huffman, Matthew K Nock
The weeks following an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization are known to be the highest-risk time for suicide. Interventions are needed that are well-matched to the dynamic nature of suicidal thoughts and easily implementable during this high-risk time. We sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel registered clinical trial that combined three brief in-person sessions to teach core cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills during hospitalization followed by smartphone-based ecological momentary intervention (EMI) to facilitate real-time practice of the emotion management skills during the 28 days after hospital discharge. Results from this pilot study (N = 26) supported some aspects of feasibility and acceptability. Regarding feasibility, 14.7% of all screened inpatients met study eligibility criteria. Half (50.3%) of those who were ineligible were ineligible because they were not part of the population for whom this treatment was designed (e.g., symptoms such as psychosis rendered them ineligible for the current study). Those who were otherwise eligible based on symptoms were primarily ineligible due to inpatient stays that were too short. Nearly half (48%) of study participants did not receive all three in-person sessions during their hospitalization. Among enrolled participants, rates of engagement with the smartphone-based assessment and EMI prompts were 51.47%. Regarding acceptability, quantitative and qualitative data supported the perceived acceptability of the intervention, and provided recommendations for future iterations. Well-powered effectiveness (and effectiveness-implementation) studies are needed to determine the effects of this promising and highly scalable intervention approach.
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of an Ecological Momentary Intervention for Managing Emotional Distress Among Psychiatric Inpatients at Risk for Suicide.","authors":"Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Adam C Jaroszewski, Joseph S Maimone, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Erin N Kilbury, Michelle B Stein, Stuart Beck, Jeff C Huffman, Matthew K Nock","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The weeks following an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization are known to be the highest-risk time for suicide. Interventions are needed that are well-matched to the dynamic nature of suicidal thoughts and easily implementable during this high-risk time. We sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel registered clinical trial that combined three brief in-person sessions to teach core cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills during hospitalization followed by smartphone-based ecological momentary intervention (EMI) to facilitate real-time practice of the emotion management skills during the 28 days after hospital discharge. Results from this pilot study (<i>N</i> = 26) supported some aspects of feasibility and acceptability. Regarding feasibility, 14.7% of all screened inpatients met study eligibility criteria. Half (50.3%) of those who were ineligible were ineligible because they were not part of the population for whom this treatment was designed (e.g., symptoms such as psychosis rendered them ineligible for the current study). Those who were otherwise eligible based on symptoms were primarily ineligible due to inpatient stays that were too short. Nearly half (48%) of study participants did not receive all three in-person sessions during their hospitalization. Among enrolled participants, rates of engagement with the smartphone-based assessment and EMI prompts were 51.47%. Regarding acceptability, quantitative and qualitative data supported the perceived acceptability of the intervention, and provided recommendations for future iterations. Well-powered effectiveness (and effectiveness-implementation) studies are needed to determine the effects of this promising and highly scalable intervention approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142054776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671
Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz
Objective: Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.
Method: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.
Results: After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.
Conclusions: There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.
{"title":"The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142054785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.
Method: A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.
Results: Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.
Conclusions: The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.
{"title":"The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode.","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Yaakov Wahl, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666
Kirsten Pauwels, Eva De Jaegere, Patrick Vanderreydt, Silke Aerts, Eva Vande Gaer, Gwendolyn Portzky
Objective: Worldwide helplines are considered an important part of suicide prevention strategies. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the impact of suicide prevention helplines on the suicidality of its users remains limited and is frequently confronted with methodological issues. This study aimed to assess the impact of crisis calls on callers' levels of crisis and suicidality both immediately after the call and at follow-up compared to before the call. After the call, the satisfaction of the callers with the intervention was also assessed.
Methods: A pre-post study, generated automatically by a telephone system, was conducted in order to compare the level of crisis and suicidality (operationalized by five indicators: hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent, and social support) experienced by callers before and immediately after the call and at follow-up (one to two weeks after the call).
Results: Callers (n = 487) showed significant improvement in their level of crisis (p < .001, d = -0.31), hopelessness (p < .001, d = -0.22), entrapment (p < .001, d = -0.25), suicide intent (p < .001, d = -0.37), and social support (p < .001, d = 0.33) after the call compared to before the call. Improvements were also found at follow-up compared to pretest. The satisfaction of callers with the helpline was high.
Conclusions: This study adds to the growing evidence on suicide prevention helplines and addresses some important methodological issues in helpline research. Furthermore, it shows promising results regarding the potential supportive impact of helplines on callers who feel suicidal.
目的:全球范围内的帮助热线被认为是预防自杀策略的重要组成部分。然而,有关预防自杀求助热线对其用户自杀倾向的影响的证据仍然有限,而且经常遇到方法问题。本研究旨在评估危机呼叫对呼叫者危机感和自杀倾向水平的影响,包括呼叫后的即时影响以及与呼叫前相比的后续影响。通话结束后,还评估了来电者对干预措施的满意度:方法: 通过电话系统自动生成的一项事前事后研究,比较来电者在通话前、通话后和随访时(通话后一至两周)所经历的危机和自杀程度(通过五项指标进行操作:绝望、困顿、可控性、自杀意向和社会支持):与呼叫前相比,呼叫者(n = 487)在呼叫后的危机感(p d = -0.31)、绝望感(p d = -0.22)、束缚感(p d = -0.25)、自杀意向(p d = -0.37)和社会支持(p d = 0.33)方面均有明显改善。与测试前相比,随访结果也有所改善。来电者对求助热线的满意度很高:这项研究补充了有关预防自杀帮助热线的越来越多的证据,并解决了帮助热线研究中一些重要的方法问题。此外,该研究还显示了帮助热线对有自杀倾向的求助者可能产生的支持性影响。
{"title":"Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality.","authors":"Kirsten Pauwels, Eva De Jaegere, Patrick Vanderreydt, Silke Aerts, Eva Vande Gaer, Gwendolyn Portzky","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Worldwide helplines are considered an important part of suicide prevention strategies. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the impact of suicide prevention helplines on the suicidality of its users remains limited and is frequently confronted with methodological issues. This study aimed to assess the impact of crisis calls on callers' levels of crisis and suicidality both immediately after the call and at follow-up compared to before the call. After the call, the satisfaction of the callers with the intervention was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post study, generated automatically by a telephone system, was conducted in order to compare the level of crisis and suicidality (operationalized by five indicators: hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent, and social support) experienced by callers before and immediately after the call and at follow-up (one to two weeks after the call).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Callers (n = 487) showed significant improvement in their level of crisis (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.31), hopelessness (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.22), entrapment (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.25), suicide intent (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.37), and social support (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 0.33) after the call compared to before the call. Improvements were also found at follow-up compared to pretest. The satisfaction of callers with the helpline was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adds to the growing evidence on suicide prevention helplines and addresses some important methodological issues in helpline research. Furthermore, it shows promising results regarding the potential supportive impact of helplines on callers who feel suicidal.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2372616
Shou En Chen, Christina F Chick, Ruth O'Hara
Objectives: Trauma exposure (TE) and cognitive flexibility (CF) are risk factors for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, it is unknown whether these risk factors contribute to mechanisms associated with distinct categories of SITBs. The current study examined the potential moderating role of TE in the relationships between CF and multiple SITBs, including active suicidal ideation (SI), passive SI, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and history of suicide attempt (SA), among pre-adolescent children.
Methods: A total of 11,326 children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study were included in the present study. SITBs and TE were measured by the Kiddy Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia (KSADS). CF was measured using the NIH Cognitive Toolbox.
Results: Cumulative TE moderated the relationship of CF to active SI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of current SI in children with a single lifetime TE, but not in children without trauma or with two or more TE. As a main effect, two or more TE predicted higher odds of active SI, passive SI, and lifetime SA, but not NSSI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of passive SI, with effects not moderated by trauma exposure.
Conclusion: The current results clarify previously inconsistent findings about the relationship of CF to SI by identifying cumulative TE as a moderator. CF served as a protective factor against SI, but only in children with a single lifetime trauma. Implications for screening and treatment targets of children at risk for distinct categories of SITBs are discussed.
目的:创伤暴露(TE)和认知灵活性(CF)是自我伤害想法和行为(SITBs)的风险因素。然而,这些风险因素是否有助于形成与不同类别的 SITBs 相关的机制,目前尚不得而知。本研究探讨了 TE 在 CF 与多种 SITB(包括主动自杀意念(SI)、被动自杀意念(SI)、非自杀性自伤(NSSI)和自杀未遂(SA))之间关系中的潜在调节作用:本研究共纳入了 11 326 名来自青少年大脑认知发展研究的儿童。SITBs和TE通过Kiddy情感障碍和精神分裂症时间表(KSADS)进行测量。CF通过美国国立卫生研究院认知工具箱进行测量:结果:累积TE调节了CF与主动SI的关系。在一生中只有一次TE的儿童中,较高的CF与较低的当前SI几率相关,但在没有创伤或有两次或两次以上TE的儿童中,CF与较低的当前SI几率无关。作为主效应,两个或两个以上 TE 预测了较高的主动 SI、被动 SI 和终生 SA 的几率,但不预测 NSSI。较高的CF与较低的被动SI几率相关,其影响不受创伤暴露的调节:目前的研究结果澄清了之前关于CF与SI关系的不一致研究结果,确定了累积TE是调节因素。CF是防止SI的保护性因素,但只适用于一生中受过一次创伤的儿童。本研究还讨论了对不同类别的 SITBs 高危儿童进行筛查和治疗的意义。
{"title":"Trauma Exposure Moderates the Link Between Cognitive Flexibility and Suicide Risk in Pre-Adolescent Children.","authors":"Shou En Chen, Christina F Chick, Ruth O'Hara","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2372616","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2372616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Trauma exposure (TE) and cognitive flexibility (CF) are risk factors for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, it is unknown whether these risk factors contribute to mechanisms associated with distinct categories of SITBs. The current study examined the potential moderating role of TE in the relationships between CF and multiple SITBs, including active suicidal ideation (SI), passive SI, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and history of suicide attempt (SA), among pre-adolescent children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 11,326 children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study were included in the present study. SITBs and TE were measured by the Kiddy Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia (KSADS). CF was measured using the NIH Cognitive Toolbox.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cumulative TE moderated the relationship of CF to active SI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of current SI in children with a single lifetime TE, but not in children without trauma or with two or more TE. As a main effect, two or more TE predicted higher odds of active SI, passive SI, and lifetime SA, but not NSSI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of passive SI, with effects not moderated by trauma exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current results clarify previously inconsistent findings about the relationship of CF to SI by identifying cumulative TE as a moderator. CF served as a protective factor against SI, but only in children with a single lifetime trauma. Implications for screening and treatment targets of children at risk for distinct categories of SITBs are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-24DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2356615
M T Lynskey, H Thurgur, A Athanasiou-Fragkouli, A K Schlag, D J Nutt
Objective: To document the prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation (SI) among individuals seeking cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs); to test whether SI declines or intensifies after three months of CBMP treatment and to document 12-month trajectories of depression in those reporting SI and other patients.
Method: Observational data were available for 3781 patients at entry to treatment, 2112 at three months and 777 for 12 months. Self-reported depressed mood and SI were assessed using items from the PHQ-9. Additional data included sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported well-being.
Results: 25% of the sample reported SI at treatment entry and those with SI had higher levels of depressed mood (mean = 17.4 vs. 11.3; F(1,3533) = 716.5, p < .001) and disturbed sleep (mean = 13.8 vs. 12.2, F(1,3533) = 125.9, p < .001), poorer general health (mean = 43.6 vs. 52.2, F(1,3533) = 118.3, p < .001) and lower quality of life (mean = 0.44 vs. 0.56 (F(1,3533) = 118.3, p < .001). The prevalence of SI reduced from 23.6% to 17.6% (z = 6.5, p < .001) at 3 months. Twelve-month follow-up indicated a substantial reduction in depressed mood with this reduction being more pronounced in those reporting SI (mean (baseline) = 17.7 vs. mean (12 months) = 10.3) than in other patients (mean (baseline) = 11.1 vs. mean (12 months) = 7.0).
Conclusions: SI is common among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat a range of chronic conditions and is associated with higher levels of depressed mood and poorer quality of life. Treatment with CBMPs reduced the prevalence and intensity of suicidal ideation.
目的记录寻求大麻药用产品(CBMPs)治疗的患者中自杀意念(SI)的发生率和相关性;检验 CBMP 治疗三个月后自杀意念是否会减弱或增强,并记录报告有自杀意念的患者和其他患者 12 个月的抑郁轨迹:我们获得了 3 781 名患者的观察数据,这些患者在开始治疗时有 2 112 人,治疗三个月后有 2 112 人,治疗 12 个月后有 777 人。使用 PHQ-9 中的项目对患者自我报告的抑郁情绪和 SI 进行评估。其他数据包括社会人口学特征和自我报告的幸福感。结果:25% 的样本在开始治疗时报告了 SI,有 SI 的患者抑郁情绪水平更高(平均值 = 17.4 vs. 11.3;F(1,3533) = 716.5,p < .001)和睡眠紊乱(平均值 = 13.8 vs. 12.2,F(1,3533) = 125.9,p < .001),一般健康状况较差(平均值 = 43.6 vs. 52.2,F(1,3533) = 118.3,p < .001),生活质量较低(平均值 = 0.44 vs. 0.56,F(1,3533) = 118.3,p < .001)。3 个月后,SI 患病率从 23.6% 降至 17.6%(z = 6.5,p < .001)。12 个月的随访表明,抑郁情绪大幅下降,报告 SI 的患者(平均(基线)= 17.7 vs. 平均(12 个月)= 10.3)比其他患者(平均(基线)= 11.1 vs. 平均(12 个月)= 7.0)的抑郁情绪下降更为明显:在寻求 CBMP 治疗一系列慢性疾病的患者中,SI 很常见,并且与较高程度的抑郁情绪和较差的生活质量有关。CBMPs治疗降低了自杀意念的发生率和强度。
{"title":"Suicidal Ideation in Medicinal Cannabis Patients: A 12-Month Prospective Study.","authors":"M T Lynskey, H Thurgur, A Athanasiou-Fragkouli, A K Schlag, D J Nutt","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2356615","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2356615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation (SI) among individuals seeking cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs); to test whether SI declines or intensifies after three months of CBMP treatment and to document 12-month trajectories of depression in those reporting SI and other patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational data were available for 3781 patients at entry to treatment, 2112 at three months and 777 for 12 months. Self-reported depressed mood and SI were assessed using items from the PHQ-9. Additional data included sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25% of the sample reported SI at treatment entry and those with SI had higher levels of depressed mood (mean = 17.4 vs. 11.3; <i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 716.5, <i>p</i> < .001) and disturbed sleep (mean = 13.8 vs. 12.2, <i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 125.9, <i>p</i> < .001), poorer general health (mean = 43.6 vs. 52.2, <i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 118.3, <i>p</i> < .001) and lower quality of life (mean = 0.44 vs. 0.56 (<i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 118.3, <i>p</i> < .001). The prevalence of SI reduced from 23.6% to 17.6% (<i>z</i> = 6.5, <i>p</i> < .001) at 3 months. Twelve-month follow-up indicated a substantial reduction in depressed mood with this reduction being more pronounced in those reporting SI (mean <sub>(baseline)</sub> = 17.7 vs. mean (12 months) = 10.3) than in other patients (mean <sub>(baseline)</sub> = 11.1 vs. mean <sub>(12 months)</sub> = 7.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SI is common among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat a range of chronic conditions and is associated with higher levels of depressed mood and poorer quality of life. Treatment with CBMPs reduced the prevalence and intensity of suicidal ideation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-24DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2382709
Finn Dario Kolochowski, Nina Kreckeler, Thomas Forkmann, Tobias Teismann
Objective: Suicide risk assessments are obligatory when patients express a death wish in clinical practice. Yet, suicide risk estimates based on unguided risk assessments have been shown to be of low reliability. Since generalizability of previous studies is limited, the current study aimed to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of risk estimates conducted by psychotherapists and psychology students using written case vignettes.
Method: In total, N = 256 participants (psychology students, psychotherapists) were presented with 24 case vignettes describing patients at either low, moderate, severe or extreme risk of suicide. Participants were asked to assign a level of risk to each single vignette at a baseline assessment and again at a follow-up assessment two weeks later.
Results: Risk estimates showed a low inter-rater reliability, both for students (AC1 = .35) and for psychotherapists (AC1 = .44). Intra-rater reliability was moderate for psychotherapists (AC1 = .59) and rather low for psychology students (AC1 = .47). In general, intra- and intra-rater reliability were highest for vignettes displaying "low" and "extreme" risk.
Conclusions: The results highlight that the reliability of unguided suicide risk assessments is questionable. Standardized risk assessment protocols are therefore recommended. Nonetheless, even reliable risk estimation does not imply predictive validity of risk estimates for future suicidal behavior.
{"title":"Reliability of Suicide Risk Estimates: A Vignette Study.","authors":"Finn Dario Kolochowski, Nina Kreckeler, Thomas Forkmann, Tobias Teismann","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2382709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2382709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide risk assessments are obligatory when patients express a death wish in clinical practice. Yet, suicide risk estimates based on unguided risk assessments have been shown to be of low reliability. Since generalizability of previous studies is limited, the current study aimed to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of risk estimates conducted by psychotherapists and psychology students using written case vignettes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In total, <i>N</i> = 256 participants (psychology students, psychotherapists) were presented with 24 case vignettes describing patients at either low, moderate, severe or extreme risk of suicide. Participants were asked to assign a level of risk to each single vignette at a baseline assessment and again at a follow-up assessment two weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risk estimates showed a low inter-rater reliability, both for students (AC<sub>1</sub> = .35) and for psychotherapists (AC<sub>1</sub> = .44). Intra-rater reliability was moderate for psychotherapists (AC<sub>1</sub> = .59) and rather low for psychology students (AC<sub>1</sub> = .47). In general, intra- and intra-rater reliability were highest for vignettes displaying \"low\" and \"extreme\" risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlight that the reliability of unguided suicide risk assessments is questionable. Standardized risk assessment protocols are therefore recommended. Nonetheless, even reliable risk estimation does not imply predictive validity of risk estimates for future suicidal behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}