首页 > 最新文献

Archives of Suicide Research最新文献

英文 中文
Financial Stress Amongst People Who Self-Harm in Sri Lanka. 斯里兰卡自残者的经济压力。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499
Blessing Nyakutsikwa, Peter James Taylor, Keith Hawton, Rob Poole, Manjula Weerasinghe, Kalpani Dissanayake, Sandamali Rajapakshe, Pramila Hashini, Michael Eddleston, Flemming Konradsen, Peter Huxley, Catherine Robinson, Melissa Pearson

Objective: Socioeconomic status deprivation is known to be associated with self-harm in Western countries but there is less information about this association in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). One way of investigating this is to assess the prevalence of indicators of financial stress in people who self-harm. We have assessed the prevalence and correlates of day-to-day financial hardships amongst individual presenting with non-fatal self-harm to hospitals in Sri Lanka.

Methods: Data on non-fatal self-harm presentations were collected from an ongoing surveillance project in 52 hospitals in Sri Lanka. A questionnaire captured data on two forms of financial stress: unmet need (i.e., costs and bills that cannot be paid) and required support (i.e., steps taken to cover costs, such as selling belongings). Additional data on demographic, economic and clinical characteristics were also collected.

Results: The sample included 2516 individuals. Both forms of financial stress were very common, with pawning/selling items (47%) and asking family or friends for money (46%) in order to pay bills or cover costs being commonly reported. Greater financial stress was associated with being aged 26-55 years, limited education, and low socioeconomic position. Financial stress was greater in women than men after adjusting for other factors.

Conclusion: The results indicate that financial stress is commonly reported amongst individuals presenting to hospital with non-fatal self-harm in Sri Lanka, especially women. The research highlights a need to attend to financial stress both within self-harm prevention and aftercare.

目的:众所周知,在西方国家,社会经济地位低下与自我伤害有关,但在中低收入国家(LMIC),有关这种关联的信息较少。调查的方法之一是评估自我伤害者中经济压力指标的普遍性。我们评估了在斯里兰卡医院就诊的非致命性自残者中日常经济困难的发生率和相关性:我们从斯里兰卡 52 家医院正在进行的监测项目中收集了有关非致命性自残的数据。调查问卷收集了两种形式的经济压力数据:未满足的需求(即无法支付的费用和账单)和所需的支持(即为支付费用而采取的措施,如变卖家产)。此外,还收集了有关人口、经济和临床特征的其他数据:结果:样本包括 2516 人。这两种形式的经济压力都非常常见,为支付账单或费用而典当/变卖物品(47%)和向家人或朋友借钱(46%)是常见的报告形式。经济压力较大与 26-55 岁、教育程度有限和社会经济地位较低有关。在对其他因素进行调整后,女性的经济压力大于男性:研究结果表明,在斯里兰卡,因非致命性自我伤害而到医院就诊的人,尤其是女性,普遍存在经济压力。这项研究强调了在预防自残和善后护理过程中关注经济压力的必要性。
{"title":"Financial Stress Amongst People Who Self-Harm in Sri Lanka.","authors":"Blessing Nyakutsikwa, Peter James Taylor, Keith Hawton, Rob Poole, Manjula Weerasinghe, Kalpani Dissanayake, Sandamali Rajapakshe, Pramila Hashini, Michael Eddleston, Flemming Konradsen, Peter Huxley, Catherine Robinson, Melissa Pearson","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Socioeconomic status deprivation is known to be associated with self-harm in Western countries but there is less information about this association in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). One way of investigating this is to assess the prevalence of indicators of financial stress in people who self-harm. We have assessed the prevalence and correlates of day-to-day financial hardships amongst individual presenting with non-fatal self-harm to hospitals in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on non-fatal self-harm presentations were collected from an ongoing surveillance project in 52 hospitals in Sri Lanka. A questionnaire captured data on two forms of financial stress: unmet need (i.e., costs and bills that cannot be paid) and required support (i.e., steps taken to cover costs, such as selling belongings). Additional data on demographic, economic and clinical characteristics were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 2516 individuals. Both forms of financial stress were very common, with pawning/selling items (47%) and asking family or friends for money (46%) in order to pay bills or cover costs being commonly reported. Greater financial stress was associated with being aged 26-55 years, limited education, and low socioeconomic position. Financial stress was greater in women than men after adjusting for other factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that financial stress is commonly reported amongst individuals presenting to hospital with non-fatal self-harm in Sri Lanka, especially women. The research highlights a need to attend to financial stress both within self-harm prevention and aftercare.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Qualitative Assessment of Reasons for Living and Dying in the Context of Feeling Trapped Among Adults in the United Kingdom. 英国成年人在感到受困的情况下对生死原因的定性评估。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915
Laura Matheson, Susan Rasmussen, Jessamyn Moxie, Robert J Cramer

Objective: Contemporary approaches to suicide assessment and treatment incorporate reasons for living (RFL) and reasons for dying (RFD). This study qualitatively explored individuals' self-described RFL and RFD in the context of suicidal thinking and behaviors.

Method: Within a community United Kingdom (UK) sample, adults (N = 331, aged 16+) responded to eight open-ended questions probing their experiences of suicide, defeat, and entrapment. Utilizing these data, which were collected from a larger online survey examining risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors, this study explored RFL and RFD within these narratives. After the research team established an initial code book, RFL and RFD codes were subsequently analyzed through inductive and deductive thematic analyses.

Results: The present study identified five complimentary RFD-RFL themes: (1) Hopelessness-Hopefulness, (2) Stress of Responsibilities-Duty to Responsibilities, (3) Social Disconnection-Social Connection, (4) Death as Sin-Desire for an Afterlife, and (5) Temporary Escapes as Coping-Entrapment (i.e., a lack of escape). Three subthemes within the RFD theme Entrapment were General/Unspecified, By Feelings, and Within Self.

Conclusions: Identified themes reflect the existing quantitative RFL and RFD literature. The identified RFL and RFD themes are discussed with reference to their clinical applications in advancing suicide-specific assessments and interventions. We propose a dimensional framework for RFD and RFL which informs future suicidal behaviors research and practice.

目的:当代的自杀评估和治疗方法包含了 "生存理由"(RFL)和 "死亡理由"(RFD)。本研究从自杀想法和行为的角度,对个人自述的RFL和RFD进行了定性探讨:在英国的一个社区样本中,成年人(N = 331,年龄在 16 岁以上)回答了八个开放式问题,探究他们的自杀、失败和被困经历。本研究利用这些从一项大型在线调查中收集的数据,对自杀行为的风险和保护因素进行了研究,并在这些叙述中对 RFL 和 RFD 进行了探讨。在研究小组建立了初始代码库后,随后通过归纳和演绎主题分析对 RFL 和 RFD 代码进行了分析:本研究确定了五个互补的 RFD-RFL 主题:(1) 无望-希望,(2) 责任压力-对责任的义务,(3) 社会断裂-社会联系,(4) 死亡是罪过-对来世的渴望,以及 (5) 临时逃避-陷入困境(即无处可逃)。RFD主题 "禁锢 "中的三个次主题是一般/不明确、通过感觉和自我内部:确定的主题反映了现有的定量 RFL 和 RFD 文献。我们讨论了已确定的 RFL 和 RFD 主题,并参考了它们在推进自杀评估和干预方面的临床应用。我们提出了 RFD 和 RFL 的维度框架,为未来的自杀行为研究和实践提供参考。
{"title":"A Qualitative Assessment of Reasons for Living and Dying in the Context of Feeling Trapped Among Adults in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Laura Matheson, Susan Rasmussen, Jessamyn Moxie, Robert J Cramer","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Contemporary approaches to suicide assessment and treatment incorporate reasons for living (RFL) and reasons for dying (RFD). This study qualitatively explored individuals' self-described RFL and RFD in the context of suicidal thinking and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Within a community United Kingdom (UK) sample, adults (<i>N</i> = 331, aged 16+) responded to eight open-ended questions probing their experiences of suicide, defeat, and entrapment. Utilizing these data, which were collected from a larger online survey examining risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors, this study explored RFL and RFD within these narratives. After the research team established an initial code book, RFL and RFD codes were subsequently analyzed through inductive and deductive thematic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present study identified five complimentary RFD-RFL themes: (1) Hopelessness-Hopefulness, (2) Stress of Responsibilities-Duty to Responsibilities, (3) Social Disconnection-Social Connection, (4) Death as Sin-Desire for an Afterlife, and (5) Temporary Escapes as Coping-Entrapment (i.e., a lack of escape). Three subthemes within the RFD theme Entrapment were General/Unspecified, By Feelings, and Within Self.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identified themes reflect the existing quantitative RFL and RFD literature. The identified RFL and RFD themes are discussed with reference to their clinical applications in advancing suicide-specific assessments and interventions. We propose a dimensional framework for RFD and RFL which informs future suicidal behaviors research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation. 作为 "零自杀 "实施工作的一部分,开发和验证安全规划实践的电子健康记录措施。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676
Jennifer M Boggs, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Erica M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Arne Beck, Cambria Bruschke, Stuart Buttlaire, Karen J Coleman, Jean P Flores, Robert Penfold, J David Powers, Julie Angerhofer Richards, Laura Richardson, Arthur Runkle, Jacqueline M Ryan, Gregory E Simon, Stacy Sterling, Christine Stewart, Scott Stumbo, LeeAnn M Quintana, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Brian K Ahmedani

Objective: Safety planning for suicide prevention is an important quality metric for Zero Suicide implementation. We describe the development, validation, and application of electronic health record (EHR) programs to measure uptake of safety planning practices across six integrated healthcare systems as part of a Zero Suicide evaluation study.

Methods: Safety planning was documented in narrative notes and structured EHR templates using the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention (SBSPI) in response to a high-risk cutoff score on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics were developed and validated using chart review to characterize practices documented in narrative notes. We applied NLP to measure frequency of documentation in the narrative text and standard programming methods to examine structured SBSPI templates from 2010-2022.

Results: Chart reviews found three safety planning practices documented in narrative notes that were delivered to at least half of patients at risk: professional contacts, lethal means counseling for firearms, and lethal means counseling for medication access/storage. NLP methods were developed to identify these practices in clinical text with high levels of accuracy (Sensitivity, Specificity, & PPV ≥ 82%). Among visits with a high-risk CSSRS, 40% (Range 2-73% by health system) had an SBSPI template within 1 year of implementation.

Conclusions: This is one of the first reports describing development of measures that leverage electronic health records to track use of suicide prevention safety plans. There are opportunities to use the methods developed here in future evaluations of safety planning.

目标:预防自杀的安全规划是实施 "零自杀 "的重要质量指标。作为 "零自杀 "评估研究的一部分,我们介绍了电子健康记录(EHR)程序的开发、验证和应用,以衡量六个综合医疗保健系统对安全规划做法的接受程度:方法:根据哥伦比亚自杀严重程度分级表(CSSRS)的高风险临界值,使用斯坦利-布朗安全规划干预(SBSPI)在叙述性笔记和结构化电子病历模板中记录安全规划。我们开发了自然语言处理 (NLP) 指标,并通过病历审查进行了验证,以描述叙述性笔记中记录的实践特征。我们应用 NLP 测量了叙述性文字中的记录频率,并采用标准编程方法检查了 2010-2022 年期间的结构化 SBSPI 模板:病历审查发现,至少有一半的高危患者在叙述性病历中记录了三种安全规划实践:专业联系、枪支致命手段咨询和药物获取/储存致命手段咨询。我们开发了 NLP 方法,以高精度(灵敏度、特异性和 PPV ≥ 82%)识别临床文本中的这些做法。在具有高风险 CSSRS 的就诊者中,40%(按医疗系统划分的范围为 2-73%)在实施后 1 年内拥有 SBSPI 模板:这是首批介绍利用电子健康记录追踪自杀预防安全计划使用情况的措施的报告之一。在未来的安全计划评估中,我们有机会使用在此开发的方法。
{"title":"Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation.","authors":"Jennifer M Boggs, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Erica M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Arne Beck, Cambria Bruschke, Stuart Buttlaire, Karen J Coleman, Jean P Flores, Robert Penfold, J David Powers, Julie Angerhofer Richards, Laura Richardson, Arthur Runkle, Jacqueline M Ryan, Gregory E Simon, Stacy Sterling, Christine Stewart, Scott Stumbo, LeeAnn M Quintana, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Brian K Ahmedani","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Safety planning for suicide prevention is an important quality metric for Zero Suicide implementation. We describe the development, validation, and application of electronic health record (EHR) programs to measure uptake of safety planning practices across six integrated healthcare systems as part of a Zero Suicide evaluation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Safety planning was documented in narrative notes and structured EHR templates using the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention (SBSPI) in response to a high-risk cutoff score on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics were developed and validated using chart review to characterize practices documented in narrative notes. We applied NLP to measure frequency of documentation in the narrative text and standard programming methods to examine structured SBSPI templates from 2010-2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chart reviews found three safety planning practices documented in narrative notes that were delivered to at least half of patients at risk: professional contacts, lethal means counseling for firearms, and lethal means counseling for medication access/storage. NLP methods were developed to identify these practices in clinical text with high levels of accuracy (Sensitivity, Specificity, & PPV ≥ 82%). Among visits with a high-risk CSSRS, 40% (Range 2-73% by health system) had an SBSPI template within 1 year of implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the first reports describing development of measures that leverage electronic health records to track use of suicide prevention safety plans. There are opportunities to use the methods developed here in future evaluations of safety planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptability and Feasibility of an Ecological Momentary Intervention for Managing Emotional Distress Among Psychiatric Inpatients at Risk for Suicide. 在有自杀风险的精神病住院患者中开展生态瞬间干预以控制情绪困扰的可接受性和可行性。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293
Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Adam C Jaroszewski, Joseph S Maimone, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Erin N Kilbury, Michelle B Stein, Stuart Beck, Jeff C Huffman, Matthew K Nock

The weeks following an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization are known to be the highest-risk time for suicide. Interventions are needed that are well-matched to the dynamic nature of suicidal thoughts and easily implementable during this high-risk time. We sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel registered clinical trial that combined three brief in-person sessions to teach core cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills during hospitalization followed by smartphone-based ecological momentary intervention (EMI) to facilitate real-time practice of the emotion management skills during the 28 days after hospital discharge. Results from this pilot study (N = 26) supported some aspects of feasibility and acceptability. Regarding feasibility, 14.7% of all screened inpatients met study eligibility criteria. Half (50.3%) of those who were ineligible were ineligible because they were not part of the population for whom this treatment was designed (e.g., symptoms such as psychosis rendered them ineligible for the current study). Those who were otherwise eligible based on symptoms were primarily ineligible due to inpatient stays that were too short. Nearly half (48%) of study participants did not receive all three in-person sessions during their hospitalization. Among enrolled participants, rates of engagement with the smartphone-based assessment and EMI prompts were 51.47%. Regarding acceptability, quantitative and qualitative data supported the perceived acceptability of the intervention, and provided recommendations for future iterations. Well-powered effectiveness (and effectiveness-implementation) studies are needed to determine the effects of this promising and highly scalable intervention approach.

众所周知,精神病患者住院后的几周是自杀风险最高的时期。在这一高风险时期,我们需要与自杀想法的动态性质相匹配且易于实施的干预措施。我们试图确定一种新型注册临床试验的可行性和可接受性,该试验结合了三节简短的面对面课程,在住院期间教授核心认知行为疗法(CBT)技能,然后进行基于智能手机的生态瞬间干预(EMI),以促进出院后 28 天内情绪管理技能的实时练习。这项试点研究(N = 26)的结果支持了可行性和可接受性的某些方面。在可行性方面,所有经过筛选的住院患者中有 14.7% 符合研究资格标准。在不符合条件的患者中,有一半(50.3%)是因为他们不属于该疗法的设计对象(例如,精神病等症状使他们不符合当前研究的要求)。那些根据症状符合条件的患者主要是因为住院时间太短而不符合条件。近一半(48%)的研究参与者在住院期间没有接受全部三次面对面治疗。在登记的参与者中,参与基于智能手机的评估和 EMI 提示的比例为 51.47%。在可接受性方面,定量和定性数据都支持干预的可接受性,并为未来的迭代提供了建议。要确定这种前景广阔、可扩展性强的干预方法的效果,还需要进行有力的有效性(和有效性实施)研究。
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of an Ecological Momentary Intervention for Managing Emotional Distress Among Psychiatric Inpatients at Risk for Suicide.","authors":"Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Adam C Jaroszewski, Joseph S Maimone, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Erin N Kilbury, Michelle B Stein, Stuart Beck, Jeff C Huffman, Matthew K Nock","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The weeks following an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization are known to be the highest-risk time for suicide. Interventions are needed that are well-matched to the dynamic nature of suicidal thoughts and easily implementable during this high-risk time. We sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel registered clinical trial that combined three brief in-person sessions to teach core cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills during hospitalization followed by smartphone-based ecological momentary intervention (EMI) to facilitate real-time practice of the emotion management skills during the 28 days after hospital discharge. Results from this pilot study (<i>N</i> = 26) supported some aspects of feasibility and acceptability. Regarding feasibility, 14.7% of all screened inpatients met study eligibility criteria. Half (50.3%) of those who were ineligible were ineligible because they were not part of the population for whom this treatment was designed (e.g., symptoms such as psychosis rendered them ineligible for the current study). Those who were otherwise eligible based on symptoms were primarily ineligible due to inpatient stays that were too short. Nearly half (48%) of study participants did not receive all three in-person sessions during their hospitalization. Among enrolled participants, rates of engagement with the smartphone-based assessment and EMI prompts were 51.47%. Regarding acceptability, quantitative and qualitative data supported the perceived acceptability of the intervention, and provided recommendations for future iterations. Well-powered effectiveness (and effectiveness-implementation) studies are needed to determine the effects of this promising and highly scalable intervention approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142054776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review. 多次自杀未遂的致死率进展:系统回顾
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671
Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz

Objective: Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.

Method: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.

Results: After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.

Conclusions: There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.

目的:自杀是全球关注的一大公共卫生问题。虽然在了解自杀行为的风险因素方面取得了一些进展,但其他相关问题受到的关注却较少。其中一个问题涉及多次自杀未遂者自杀行为的纵向发展过程。本系统综述调查了多次自杀未遂的致死率是否会增加:本系统综述遵循 PRISMA 2020 报告指南。从开始到 2023 年 8 月,在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO 电子数据库中进行了文献检索,以确定与多次自杀未遂和致死率相关的研究。综述包括具有多次自杀未遂数据的纵向研究,以及对其致死率的任何评级。Covidence用于指导筛选和提取过程。采用叙事综合法对纳入的研究进行描述性总结:结果:在筛选出 828 份独特的摘要后,纳入了 11 项研究进行叙述性综合。自杀未遂的评估方法和定义各不相同,通常根据自杀未遂的方法间接推断致死率。重复尝试自杀的人可能更倾向于继续使用相同的方法:没有证据表明重复自杀未遂会增加致死率。然而,在解释这一点时,还应考虑到证据基础稀缺、异质性强且方法有限这一事实。
{"title":"The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142054785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode. 改变和摆脱自杀倾向的跨理论模型。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674
Yosef Sokol, Yaakov Wahl, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Marianne Goodman

Objective: The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.

Method: A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.

Results: Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.

Conclusions: The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.

目的改变的跨理论模型(TTM)是一个成熟的模型,概述了心理治疗背景下改变的五个阶段:前沉思、沉思、准备、行动和维持。研究表明,这些模型可以增强患者和临床医生对复杂过程的理解,并确定在特定时期对个人的最佳治疗支持,从而使患者和临床医生受益。本研究旨在将 TTM 应用于自杀事件后的个人恢复:方法:我们对概述了自杀事件后康复的不同阶段的定性研究进行了元综合。将确定的恢复阶段映射到相应的 TTM 阶段:结果:恢复过程遵循与 TTM 阶段一致的模式,但在个人恢复的背景下,行动、维持和终止阶段没有得到明确区分。因此,提出了一个三阶段模型:(1)前沉思,在这一阶段,康复被认为是不可能的或没有意义的;(2)沉思,在这一阶段,对康复和改变的可能性有了越来越多的认识和考虑;(3)积极成长,这一阶段的特点是不断取得进展并参与至少一个个人康复过程:结论:所提出的三阶段模型浓缩了 TTM 的后期阶段,可以更好地反映个人从自杀事件中恢复的情况。在临床环境中应用该模型有助于对病例进行概念化,并为个人当前阶段的康复方法提供参考。未来的研究应评估将变化阶段纳入以自杀为重点的康复干预的益处,以开发更有效的干预措施。
{"title":"The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode.","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Yaakov Wahl, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality. 评估自杀预防热线对来电者危机程度和自杀倾向的影响。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666
Kirsten Pauwels, Eva De Jaegere, Patrick Vanderreydt, Silke Aerts, Eva Vande Gaer, Gwendolyn Portzky

Objective: Worldwide helplines are considered an important part of suicide prevention strategies. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the impact of suicide prevention helplines on the suicidality of its users remains limited and is frequently confronted with methodological issues. This study aimed to assess the impact of crisis calls on callers' levels of crisis and suicidality both immediately after the call and at follow-up compared to before the call. After the call, the satisfaction of the callers with the intervention was also assessed.

Methods: A pre-post study, generated automatically by a telephone system, was conducted in order to compare the level of crisis and suicidality (operationalized by five indicators: hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent, and social support) experienced by callers before and immediately after the call and at follow-up (one to two weeks after the call).

Results: Callers (n = 487) showed significant improvement in their level of crisis (p < .001, d = -0.31), hopelessness (p < .001, d = -0.22), entrapment (p < .001, d = -0.25), suicide intent (p < .001, d = -0.37), and social support (p < .001, d = 0.33) after the call compared to before the call. Improvements were also found at follow-up compared to pretest. The satisfaction of callers with the helpline was high.

Conclusions: This study adds to the growing evidence on suicide prevention helplines and addresses some important methodological issues in helpline research. Furthermore, it shows promising results regarding the potential supportive impact of helplines on callers who feel suicidal.

目的:全球范围内的帮助热线被认为是预防自杀策略的重要组成部分。然而,有关预防自杀求助热线对其用户自杀倾向的影响的证据仍然有限,而且经常遇到方法问题。本研究旨在评估危机呼叫对呼叫者危机感和自杀倾向水平的影响,包括呼叫后的即时影响以及与呼叫前相比的后续影响。通话结束后,还评估了来电者对干预措施的满意度:方法: 通过电话系统自动生成的一项事前事后研究,比较来电者在通话前、通话后和随访时(通话后一至两周)所经历的危机和自杀程度(通过五项指标进行操作:绝望、困顿、可控性、自杀意向和社会支持):与呼叫前相比,呼叫者(n = 487)在呼叫后的危机感(p d = -0.31)、绝望感(p d = -0.22)、束缚感(p d = -0.25)、自杀意向(p d = -0.37)和社会支持(p d = 0.33)方面均有明显改善。与测试前相比,随访结果也有所改善。来电者对求助热线的满意度很高:这项研究补充了有关预防自杀帮助热线的越来越多的证据,并解决了帮助热线研究中一些重要的方法问题。此外,该研究还显示了帮助热线对有自杀倾向的求助者可能产生的支持性影响。
{"title":"Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality.","authors":"Kirsten Pauwels, Eva De Jaegere, Patrick Vanderreydt, Silke Aerts, Eva Vande Gaer, Gwendolyn Portzky","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Worldwide helplines are considered an important part of suicide prevention strategies. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the impact of suicide prevention helplines on the suicidality of its users remains limited and is frequently confronted with methodological issues. This study aimed to assess the impact of crisis calls on callers' levels of crisis and suicidality both immediately after the call and at follow-up compared to before the call. After the call, the satisfaction of the callers with the intervention was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post study, generated automatically by a telephone system, was conducted in order to compare the level of crisis and suicidality (operationalized by five indicators: hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent, and social support) experienced by callers before and immediately after the call and at follow-up (one to two weeks after the call).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Callers (n = 487) showed significant improvement in their level of crisis (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.31), hopelessness (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.22), entrapment (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.25), suicide intent (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.37), and social support (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 0.33) after the call compared to before the call. Improvements were also found at follow-up compared to pretest. The satisfaction of callers with the helpline was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adds to the growing evidence on suicide prevention helplines and addresses some important methodological issues in helpline research. Furthermore, it shows promising results regarding the potential supportive impact of helplines on callers who feel suicidal.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trauma Exposure Moderates the Link Between Cognitive Flexibility and Suicide Risk in Pre-Adolescent Children. 创伤暴露调节青春期前儿童认知灵活性与自杀风险之间的关系
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2372616
Shou En Chen, Christina F Chick, Ruth O'Hara

Objectives: Trauma exposure (TE) and cognitive flexibility (CF) are risk factors for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, it is unknown whether these risk factors contribute to mechanisms associated with distinct categories of SITBs. The current study examined the potential moderating role of TE in the relationships between CF and multiple SITBs, including active suicidal ideation (SI), passive SI, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and history of suicide attempt (SA), among pre-adolescent children.

Methods: A total of 11,326 children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study were included in the present study. SITBs and TE were measured by the Kiddy Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia (KSADS). CF was measured using the NIH Cognitive Toolbox.

Results: Cumulative TE moderated the relationship of CF to active SI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of current SI in children with a single lifetime TE, but not in children without trauma or with two or more TE. As a main effect, two or more TE predicted higher odds of active SI, passive SI, and lifetime SA, but not NSSI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of passive SI, with effects not moderated by trauma exposure.

Conclusion: The current results clarify previously inconsistent findings about the relationship of CF to SI by identifying cumulative TE as a moderator. CF served as a protective factor against SI, but only in children with a single lifetime trauma. Implications for screening and treatment targets of children at risk for distinct categories of SITBs are discussed.

目的:创伤暴露(TE)和认知灵活性(CF)是自我伤害想法和行为(SITBs)的风险因素。然而,这些风险因素是否有助于形成与不同类别的 SITBs 相关的机制,目前尚不得而知。本研究探讨了 TE 在 CF 与多种 SITB(包括主动自杀意念(SI)、被动自杀意念(SI)、非自杀性自伤(NSSI)和自杀未遂(SA))之间关系中的潜在调节作用:本研究共纳入了 11 326 名来自青少年大脑认知发展研究的儿童。SITBs和TE通过Kiddy情感障碍和精神分裂症时间表(KSADS)进行测量。CF通过美国国立卫生研究院认知工具箱进行测量:结果:累积TE调节了CF与主动SI的关系。在一生中只有一次TE的儿童中,较高的CF与较低的当前SI几率相关,但在没有创伤或有两次或两次以上TE的儿童中,CF与较低的当前SI几率无关。作为主效应,两个或两个以上 TE 预测了较高的主动 SI、被动 SI 和终生 SA 的几率,但不预测 NSSI。较高的CF与较低的被动SI几率相关,其影响不受创伤暴露的调节:目前的研究结果澄清了之前关于CF与SI关系的不一致研究结果,确定了累积TE是调节因素。CF是防止SI的保护性因素,但只适用于一生中受过一次创伤的儿童。本研究还讨论了对不同类别的 SITBs 高危儿童进行筛查和治疗的意义。
{"title":"Trauma Exposure Moderates the Link Between Cognitive Flexibility and Suicide Risk in Pre-Adolescent Children.","authors":"Shou En Chen, Christina F Chick, Ruth O'Hara","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2372616","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2372616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Trauma exposure (TE) and cognitive flexibility (CF) are risk factors for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). However, it is unknown whether these risk factors contribute to mechanisms associated with distinct categories of SITBs. The current study examined the potential moderating role of TE in the relationships between CF and multiple SITBs, including active suicidal ideation (SI), passive SI, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and history of suicide attempt (SA), among pre-adolescent children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 11,326 children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study were included in the present study. SITBs and TE were measured by the Kiddy Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia (KSADS). CF was measured using the NIH Cognitive Toolbox.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cumulative TE moderated the relationship of CF to active SI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of current SI in children with a single lifetime TE, but not in children without trauma or with two or more TE. As a main effect, two or more TE predicted higher odds of active SI, passive SI, and lifetime SA, but not NSSI. Higher CF was associated with lower odds of passive SI, with effects not moderated by trauma exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current results clarify previously inconsistent findings about the relationship of CF to SI by identifying cumulative TE as a moderator. CF served as a protective factor against SI, but only in children with a single lifetime trauma. Implications for screening and treatment targets of children at risk for distinct categories of SITBs are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suicidal Ideation in Medicinal Cannabis Patients: A 12-Month Prospective Study. 药用大麻患者的自杀意念:为期 12 个月的前瞻性研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2356615
M T Lynskey, H Thurgur, A Athanasiou-Fragkouli, A K Schlag, D J Nutt

Objective: To document the prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation (SI) among individuals seeking cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs); to test whether SI declines or intensifies after three months of CBMP treatment and to document 12-month trajectories of depression in those reporting SI and other patients.

Method: Observational data were available for 3781 patients at entry to treatment, 2112 at three months and 777 for 12 months. Self-reported depressed mood and SI were assessed using items from the PHQ-9. Additional data included sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported well-being.

Results: 25% of the sample reported SI at treatment entry and those with SI had higher levels of depressed mood (mean = 17.4 vs. 11.3; F(1,3533) = 716.5, p < .001) and disturbed sleep (mean = 13.8 vs. 12.2, F(1,3533) = 125.9, p < .001), poorer general health (mean = 43.6 vs. 52.2, F(1,3533) = 118.3, p < .001) and lower quality of life (mean = 0.44 vs. 0.56 (F(1,3533) = 118.3, p < .001). The prevalence of SI reduced from 23.6% to 17.6% (z = 6.5, p < .001) at 3 months. Twelve-month follow-up indicated a substantial reduction in depressed mood with this reduction being more pronounced in those reporting SI (mean (baseline) = 17.7 vs. mean (12 months) = 10.3) than in other patients (mean (baseline) = 11.1 vs. mean (12 months) = 7.0).

Conclusions: SI is common among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat a range of chronic conditions and is associated with higher levels of depressed mood and poorer quality of life. Treatment with CBMPs reduced the prevalence and intensity of suicidal ideation.

目的记录寻求大麻药用产品(CBMPs)治疗的患者中自杀意念(SI)的发生率和相关性;检验 CBMP 治疗三个月后自杀意念是否会减弱或增强,并记录报告有自杀意念的患者和其他患者 12 个月的抑郁轨迹:我们获得了 3 781 名患者的观察数据,这些患者在开始治疗时有 2 112 人,治疗三个月后有 2 112 人,治疗 12 个月后有 777 人。使用 PHQ-9 中的项目对患者自我报告的抑郁情绪和 SI 进行评估。其他数据包括社会人口学特征和自我报告的幸福感。结果:25% 的样本在开始治疗时报告了 SI,有 SI 的患者抑郁情绪水平更高(平均值 = 17.4 vs. 11.3;F(1,3533) = 716.5,p < .001)和睡眠紊乱(平均值 = 13.8 vs. 12.2,F(1,3533) = 125.9,p < .001),一般健康状况较差(平均值 = 43.6 vs. 52.2,F(1,3533) = 118.3,p < .001),生活质量较低(平均值 = 0.44 vs. 0.56,F(1,3533) = 118.3,p < .001)。3 个月后,SI 患病率从 23.6% 降至 17.6%(z = 6.5,p < .001)。12 个月的随访表明,抑郁情绪大幅下降,报告 SI 的患者(平均(基线)= 17.7 vs. 平均(12 个月)= 10.3)比其他患者(平均(基线)= 11.1 vs. 平均(12 个月)= 7.0)的抑郁情绪下降更为明显:在寻求 CBMP 治疗一系列慢性疾病的患者中,SI 很常见,并且与较高程度的抑郁情绪和较差的生活质量有关。CBMPs治疗降低了自杀意念的发生率和强度。
{"title":"Suicidal Ideation in Medicinal Cannabis Patients: A 12-Month Prospective Study.","authors":"M T Lynskey, H Thurgur, A Athanasiou-Fragkouli, A K Schlag, D J Nutt","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2356615","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2356615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation (SI) among individuals seeking cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs); to test whether SI declines or intensifies after three months of CBMP treatment and to document 12-month trajectories of depression in those reporting SI and other patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational data were available for 3781 patients at entry to treatment, 2112 at three months and 777 for 12 months. Self-reported depressed mood and SI were assessed using items from the PHQ-9. Additional data included sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25% of the sample reported SI at treatment entry and those with SI had higher levels of depressed mood (mean = 17.4 vs. 11.3; <i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 716.5, <i>p</i> < .001) and disturbed sleep (mean = 13.8 vs. 12.2, <i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 125.9, <i>p</i> < .001), poorer general health (mean = 43.6 vs. 52.2, <i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 118.3, <i>p</i> < .001) and lower quality of life (mean = 0.44 vs. 0.56 (<i>F</i><sub>(1,3533)</sub> = 118.3, <i>p</i> < .001). The prevalence of SI reduced from 23.6% to 17.6% (<i>z</i> = 6.5, <i>p</i> < .001) at 3 months. Twelve-month follow-up indicated a substantial reduction in depressed mood with this reduction being more pronounced in those reporting SI (mean <sub>(baseline)</sub> = 17.7 vs. mean (12 months) = 10.3) than in other patients (mean <sub>(baseline)</sub> = 11.1 vs. mean <sub>(12 months)</sub> = 7.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SI is common among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat a range of chronic conditions and is associated with higher levels of depressed mood and poorer quality of life. Treatment with CBMPs reduced the prevalence and intensity of suicidal ideation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability of Suicide Risk Estimates: A Vignette Study. 自杀风险估计的可靠性:小故事研究
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2382709
Finn Dario Kolochowski, Nina Kreckeler, Thomas Forkmann, Tobias Teismann

Objective: Suicide risk assessments are obligatory when patients express a death wish in clinical practice. Yet, suicide risk estimates based on unguided risk assessments have been shown to be of low reliability. Since generalizability of previous studies is limited, the current study aimed to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of risk estimates conducted by psychotherapists and psychology students using written case vignettes.

Method: In total, N = 256 participants (psychology students, psychotherapists) were presented with 24 case vignettes describing patients at either low, moderate, severe or extreme risk of suicide. Participants were asked to assign a level of risk to each single vignette at a baseline assessment and again at a follow-up assessment two weeks later.

Results: Risk estimates showed a low inter-rater reliability, both for students (AC1 = .35) and for psychotherapists (AC1 = .44). Intra-rater reliability was moderate for psychotherapists (AC1 = .59) and rather low for psychology students (AC1 = .47). In general, intra- and intra-rater reliability were highest for vignettes displaying "low" and "extreme" risk.

Conclusions: The results highlight that the reliability of unguided suicide risk assessments is questionable. Standardized risk assessment protocols are therefore recommended. Nonetheless, even reliable risk estimation does not imply predictive validity of risk estimates for future suicidal behavior.

目的:在临床实践中,当患者表达死亡意愿时,必须进行自杀风险评估。然而,根据无指导风险评估得出的自杀风险估计值已被证明可靠性较低。由于以往研究的推广性有限,本研究旨在利用书面案例小故事评估心理治疗师和心理学专业学生进行的风险估计的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性:方法:共向 N = 256 名参与者(心理学学生、心理治疗师)展示了 24 个案例,分别描述了自杀风险较低、中等、严重或极端的患者。参与者被要求在基线评估和两周后的随访评估中为每个小故事指定一个风险等级:学生(AC1 = .35)和心理治疗师(AC1 = .44)的风险估计值显示出较低的评分者间可靠性。心理治疗师的评分者内部信度为中等(AC1 = .59),心理学专业学生的评分者内部信度较低(AC1 = .47)。总的来说,在显示 "低度 "和 "极度 "风险的小节中,评分者内部和评分者内部的信度最高:研究结果表明,无指导的自杀风险评估的可靠性值得怀疑。因此,建议采用标准化的风险评估方案。然而,即使是可靠的风险估计也并不意味着风险估计对未来自杀行为的预测有效性。
{"title":"Reliability of Suicide Risk Estimates: A Vignette Study.","authors":"Finn Dario Kolochowski, Nina Kreckeler, Thomas Forkmann, Tobias Teismann","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2382709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2382709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide risk assessments are obligatory when patients express a death wish in clinical practice. Yet, suicide risk estimates based on unguided risk assessments have been shown to be of low reliability. Since generalizability of previous studies is limited, the current study aimed to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of risk estimates conducted by psychotherapists and psychology students using written case vignettes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In total, <i>N</i> = 256 participants (psychology students, psychotherapists) were presented with 24 case vignettes describing patients at either low, moderate, severe or extreme risk of suicide. Participants were asked to assign a level of risk to each single vignette at a baseline assessment and again at a follow-up assessment two weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risk estimates showed a low inter-rater reliability, both for students (AC<sub>1</sub> = .35) and for psychotherapists (AC<sub>1</sub> = .44). Intra-rater reliability was moderate for psychotherapists (AC<sub>1</sub> = .59) and rather low for psychology students (AC<sub>1</sub> = .47). In general, intra- and intra-rater reliability were highest for vignettes displaying \"low\" and \"extreme\" risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlight that the reliability of unguided suicide risk assessments is questionable. Standardized risk assessment protocols are therefore recommended. Nonetheless, even reliable risk estimation does not imply predictive validity of risk estimates for future suicidal behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of Suicide Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1