Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-11-16DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2280227
Chao S Hu, Haotian Zhang, Lindsey A Short, Mengyuan Liu, Chengli Huang, Zhijian Liang, Ying Yang, Manxia Huang, Dong Xie
Objective: Suicide ideation (SI) is prevalent among college students, and suicide disclosure (SD) is critical for crisis intervention. However, students with SI may worry about stigmatizing responses to their disclosure. To better understand the mechanism of stigmatizing responses to SD, we investigated the effects of a hypothetical classmate's SD on college students' emotions and reasoning when providing advice to a distressed classmate.
Method: In a randomized controlled experiment, students wrote advice to a hypothetical classmate who recently failed in his pursuit of a romantic relationship with a peer. The experimental/control group also learned he wanted to either commit suicide/quit school. When typing the advice, participants' facial expressions were recorded and analyzed by Facereader7.1. After advising, participants reported their sadness, joy, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust when advising. Finally, trained coders coded the common themes of their advice and rated the wise reasoning involved. Additionally, two experts in suicide prevention rated the helpfulness of their advice for the classmate.
Results: The experimental group showed significantly fewer facial expressions of happiness, reported higher sadness and fear, provided less helpful advice, and mentioned "confronting reality" less during advising. The difference in disgust and wise reasoning was nonsignificant.
Conclusion: Learning of a classmate's SI may increase fear and sadness among recipients and reduce the helpfulness of their advice. Increased psychoeducation for students that focuses on improving emotional regulation (especially facial expressions) during SI may reduce the stigma surrounding SI and prevent perceived burdensomeness among individuals with SI after SD.
{"title":"Learning of a Classmate's Suicide Ideation Affects Emotions When Advising the Classmate and the Helpfulness of the Advice Provided.","authors":"Chao S Hu, Haotian Zhang, Lindsey A Short, Mengyuan Liu, Chengli Huang, Zhijian Liang, Ying Yang, Manxia Huang, Dong Xie","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2023.2280227","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2023.2280227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide ideation (SI) is prevalent among college students, and suicide disclosure (SD) is critical for crisis intervention. However, students with SI may worry about stigmatizing responses to their disclosure. To better understand the mechanism of stigmatizing responses to SD, we investigated the effects of a hypothetical classmate's SD on college students' emotions and reasoning when providing advice to a distressed classmate.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a randomized controlled experiment, students wrote advice to a hypothetical classmate who recently failed in his pursuit of a romantic relationship with a peer. The experimental/control group also learned he wanted to either <i>commit suicide/quit school</i>. When typing the advice, participants' facial expressions were recorded and analyzed by Facereader7.1. After advising, participants reported their sadness, joy, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust when advising. Finally, trained coders coded the common themes of their advice and rated the wise reasoning involved. Additionally, two experts in suicide prevention rated the helpfulness of their advice for the classmate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group showed significantly fewer facial expressions of happiness, reported higher sadness and fear, provided less helpful advice, and mentioned \"confronting reality\" less during advising. The difference in disgust and wise reasoning was nonsignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Learning of a classmate's SI may increase fear and sadness among recipients and reduce the helpfulness of their advice. Increased psychoeducation for students that focuses on improving emotional regulation (especially facial expressions) during SI may reduce the stigma surrounding SI and prevent perceived burdensomeness among individuals with SI after SD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1158-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136396004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2403491
Molly Adrian, Kiera M James, Robert Gallop, Phuonguyen V Chu, Ann Vander Stoep, Elizabeth McCauley
Objective: Understanding patterns of suicide risk over the course of development can aid our ability to prevent suicide. Our community-based study examined changes in suicide risk status and predictors of changes in risk status in a sample of 521 adolescents over six assessments between the start of middle school and young adulthood (ages 12-22).
Methods: Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) were measured with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children and the Moods and Feelings Questionnaire. Latent transition analysis (LTA) was utilized to evaluate transitions in suicide risk status over the course of development. Nine risk factors' initial values and change over time were modeled as predictors in the LTA.
Results: Latent class analysis identified a four-class model of developmental suicide risk patterns: Class 1: Infrequent STB (73-87% of participants), Class 2: Diminishing STB (1-17% of participants), Class 3: Escalating STB (6-16% of participants), and Class 4: Consistently High STB (1-5% of participants). LTA demonstrated that infrequent STB members and escalating STB members were likely to maintain their risk class across time points.
Conclusions: Classification of STB trajectories demonstrated self-worth and family involvement were salient variables affecting transitions in risk over time and suggest prevention targets early in adolescence that could have impact on suicide risk in adulthood.
{"title":"Transitions in Suicide Risk from Early Adolescence to Early Adulthood.","authors":"Molly Adrian, Kiera M James, Robert Gallop, Phuonguyen V Chu, Ann Vander Stoep, Elizabeth McCauley","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2403491","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2403491","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understanding patterns of suicide risk over the course of development can aid our ability to prevent suicide. Our community-based study examined changes in suicide risk status and predictors of changes in risk status in a sample of 521 adolescents over six assessments between the start of middle school and young adulthood (ages 12-22).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) were measured with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children and the Moods and Feelings Questionnaire. Latent transition analysis (LTA) was utilized to evaluate transitions in suicide risk status over the course of development. Nine risk factors' initial values and change over time were modeled as predictors in the LTA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Latent class analysis identified a four-class model of developmental suicide risk patterns: Class 1: Infrequent STB (73-87% of participants), Class 2: Diminishing STB (1-17% of participants), Class 3: Escalating STB (6-16% of participants), and Class 4: Consistently High STB (1-5% of participants). LTA demonstrated that infrequent STB members and escalating STB members were likely to maintain their risk class across time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Classification of STB trajectories demonstrated self-worth and family involvement were salient variables affecting transitions in risk over time and suggest prevention targets early in adolescence that could have impact on suicide risk in adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142340081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-20DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2405732
Kayla A Lord, David F Tolin, Gretchen J Diefenbach
Objective: Psychiatric multimorbidity is a well-documented risk factor for suicide. However, diagnostic heterogeneity and patterns of comorbidity likely exists within the population of those who attempt suicide. Person-centered statistical approaches, such as latent class analysis (LCA), extract distinguishable groups differentiated by prevalence and comorbidity of psychiatric disorders.
Method: The present study used LCA to identify typologies of psychiatric heterogeneity in a sample of 213 inpatients (M age = 33.04 [SD = 12.67]; 57.3% female; 62.4% White; 23.9% Hispanic/Latino) with a history of suicide attempt who were recruited for a suicide prevention clinical trial. Class differences in suicide history characteristics; demographic characteristics; and cognitive-affective and behavioral risk factors, obtained from an initial evaluation involving the administration of a semi-structured diagnostic interview, suicide risk assessment, and battery of self-report measures, were explored.
Results: LCA identified three classes in the best-fitting solution: Depressive-High Comorbidity (n = 68), Depressive-Low Comorbidity (n = 86), and Bipolar (n = 59). The Depressive-Low Comorbidity class reported less severe suicidal ideation (p < .001), anxiety (p < .001), stress (p < .001), unlovability beliefs (p = .006), and impulsivity (p < .001). The Depressive-Low Comorbidity class also reported fewer actual attempts than the Bipolar class (p = .001) and fewer interrupted attempts than the Depressive-High Comorbidity class (p = .004).
Conclusions: The Depressive-High Comorbidity and Bipolar classes consistently endorsed higher levels of suicide risk factors. These findings may help to illuminate typologies of suicide attempters with unique clinical needs, which is an essential step toward personalized medicine.
{"title":"Typologies of Psychiatric Diagnoses Among Inpatients with Recent Suicide Attempts.","authors":"Kayla A Lord, David F Tolin, Gretchen J Diefenbach","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2405732","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2405732","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychiatric multimorbidity is a well-documented risk factor for suicide. However, diagnostic heterogeneity and patterns of comorbidity likely exists within the population of those who attempt suicide. Person-centered statistical approaches, such as latent class analysis (LCA), extract distinguishable groups differentiated by prevalence and comorbidity of psychiatric disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The present study used LCA to identify typologies of psychiatric heterogeneity in a sample of 213 inpatients (<i>M</i> age = 33.04 [<i>SD</i> = 12.67]; 57.3% female; 62.4% White; 23.9% Hispanic/Latino) with a history of suicide attempt who were recruited for a suicide prevention clinical trial. Class differences in suicide history characteristics; demographic characteristics; and cognitive-affective and behavioral risk factors, obtained from an initial evaluation involving the administration of a semi-structured diagnostic interview, suicide risk assessment, and battery of self-report measures, were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LCA identified three classes in the best-fitting solution: Depressive-High Comorbidity (<i>n</i> = 68), Depressive-Low Comorbidity (<i>n</i> = 86), and Bipolar (<i>n</i> = 59). The Depressive-Low Comorbidity class reported less severe suicidal ideation (<i>p</i> < .001), anxiety (<i>p</i> < .001), stress (<i>p</i> < .001), unlovability beliefs (<i>p</i> = .006), and impulsivity (<i>p</i> < .001). The Depressive-Low Comorbidity class also reported fewer actual attempts than the Bipolar class (<i>p</i> = .001) and fewer interrupted attempts than the Depressive-High Comorbidity class (<i>p</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Depressive-High Comorbidity and Bipolar classes consistently endorsed higher levels of suicide risk factors. These findings may help to illuminate typologies of suicide attempters with unique clinical needs, which is an essential step toward personalized medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-20DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499
Blessing Nyakutsikwa, Peter James Taylor, Keith Hawton, Rob Poole, Manjula Weerasinghe, Kalpani Dissanayake, Sandamali Rajapakshe, Pramila Hashini, Michael Eddleston, Flemming Konradsen, Peter Huxley, Catherine Robinson, Melissa Pearson
Objective: Socioeconomic status deprivation is known to be associated with self-harm in Western countries but there is less information about this association in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). One way of investigating this is to assess the prevalence of indicators of financial stress in people who self-harm. We have assessed the prevalence and correlates of day-to-day financial hardships amongst individual presenting with non-fatal self-harm to hospitals in Sri Lanka.
Methods: Data on non-fatal self-harm presentations were collected from an ongoing surveillance project in 52 hospitals in Sri Lanka. A questionnaire captured data on two forms of financial stress: unmet need (i.e., costs and bills that cannot be paid) and required support (i.e., steps taken to cover costs, such as selling belongings). Additional data on demographic, economic and clinical characteristics were also collected.
Results: The sample included 2516 individuals. Both forms of financial stress were very common, with pawning/selling items (47%) and asking family or friends for money (46%) in order to pay bills or cover costs being commonly reported. Greater financial stress was associated with being aged 26-55 years, limited education, and low socioeconomic position. Financial stress was greater in women than men after adjusting for other factors.
Conclusion: The results indicate that financial stress is commonly reported amongst individuals presenting to hospital with non-fatal self-harm in Sri Lanka, especially women. The research highlights a need to attend to financial stress both within self-harm prevention and aftercare.
{"title":"Financial Stress Amongst People Who Self-Harm in Sri Lanka.","authors":"Blessing Nyakutsikwa, Peter James Taylor, Keith Hawton, Rob Poole, Manjula Weerasinghe, Kalpani Dissanayake, Sandamali Rajapakshe, Pramila Hashini, Michael Eddleston, Flemming Konradsen, Peter Huxley, Catherine Robinson, Melissa Pearson","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2403499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Socioeconomic status deprivation is known to be associated with self-harm in Western countries but there is less information about this association in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). One way of investigating this is to assess the prevalence of indicators of financial stress in people who self-harm. We have assessed the prevalence and correlates of day-to-day financial hardships amongst individual presenting with non-fatal self-harm to hospitals in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on non-fatal self-harm presentations were collected from an ongoing surveillance project in 52 hospitals in Sri Lanka. A questionnaire captured data on two forms of financial stress: unmet need (i.e., costs and bills that cannot be paid) and required support (i.e., steps taken to cover costs, such as selling belongings). Additional data on demographic, economic and clinical characteristics were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 2516 individuals. Both forms of financial stress were very common, with pawning/selling items (47%) and asking family or friends for money (46%) in order to pay bills or cover costs being commonly reported. Greater financial stress was associated with being aged 26-55 years, limited education, and low socioeconomic position. Financial stress was greater in women than men after adjusting for other factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that financial stress is commonly reported amongst individuals presenting to hospital with non-fatal self-harm in Sri Lanka, especially women. The research highlights a need to attend to financial stress both within self-harm prevention and aftercare.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915
Laura Matheson, Susan Rasmussen, Jessamyn Moxie, Robert J Cramer
Objective: Contemporary approaches to suicide assessment and treatment incorporate reasons for living (RFL) and reasons for dying (RFD). This study qualitatively explored individuals' self-described RFL and RFD in the context of suicidal thinking and behaviors.
Method: Within a community United Kingdom (UK) sample, adults (N = 331, aged 16+) responded to eight open-ended questions probing their experiences of suicide, defeat, and entrapment. Utilizing these data, which were collected from a larger online survey examining risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors, this study explored RFL and RFD within these narratives. After the research team established an initial code book, RFL and RFD codes were subsequently analyzed through inductive and deductive thematic analyses.
Results: The present study identified five complimentary RFD-RFL themes: (1) Hopelessness-Hopefulness, (2) Stress of Responsibilities-Duty to Responsibilities, (3) Social Disconnection-Social Connection, (4) Death as Sin-Desire for an Afterlife, and (5) Temporary Escapes as Coping-Entrapment (i.e., a lack of escape). Three subthemes within the RFD theme Entrapment were General/Unspecified, By Feelings, and Within Self.
Conclusions: Identified themes reflect the existing quantitative RFL and RFD literature. The identified RFL and RFD themes are discussed with reference to their clinical applications in advancing suicide-specific assessments and interventions. We propose a dimensional framework for RFD and RFL which informs future suicidal behaviors research and practice.
{"title":"A Qualitative Assessment of Reasons for Living and Dying in the Context of Feeling Trapped Among Adults in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Laura Matheson, Susan Rasmussen, Jessamyn Moxie, Robert J Cramer","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2400915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Contemporary approaches to suicide assessment and treatment incorporate reasons for living (RFL) and reasons for dying (RFD). This study qualitatively explored individuals' self-described RFL and RFD in the context of suicidal thinking and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Within a community United Kingdom (UK) sample, adults (<i>N</i> = 331, aged 16+) responded to eight open-ended questions probing their experiences of suicide, defeat, and entrapment. Utilizing these data, which were collected from a larger online survey examining risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors, this study explored RFL and RFD within these narratives. After the research team established an initial code book, RFL and RFD codes were subsequently analyzed through inductive and deductive thematic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present study identified five complimentary RFD-RFL themes: (1) Hopelessness-Hopefulness, (2) Stress of Responsibilities-Duty to Responsibilities, (3) Social Disconnection-Social Connection, (4) Death as Sin-Desire for an Afterlife, and (5) Temporary Escapes as Coping-Entrapment (i.e., a lack of escape). Three subthemes within the RFD theme Entrapment were General/Unspecified, By Feelings, and Within Self.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identified themes reflect the existing quantitative RFL and RFD literature. The identified RFL and RFD themes are discussed with reference to their clinical applications in advancing suicide-specific assessments and interventions. We propose a dimensional framework for RFD and RFL which informs future suicidal behaviors research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142279804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-28DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676
Jennifer M Boggs, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Erica M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Arne Beck, Cambria Bruschke, Stuart Buttlaire, Karen J Coleman, Jean P Flores, Robert Penfold, J David Powers, Julie Angerhofer Richards, Laura Richardson, Arthur Runkle, Jacqueline M Ryan, Gregory E Simon, Stacy Sterling, Christine Stewart, Scott Stumbo, LeeAnn M Quintana, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Brian K Ahmedani
Objective: Safety planning for suicide prevention is an important quality metric for Zero Suicide implementation. We describe the development, validation, and application of electronic health record (EHR) programs to measure uptake of safety planning practices across six integrated healthcare systems as part of a Zero Suicide evaluation study.
Methods: Safety planning was documented in narrative notes and structured EHR templates using the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention (SBSPI) in response to a high-risk cutoff score on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics were developed and validated using chart review to characterize practices documented in narrative notes. We applied NLP to measure frequency of documentation in the narrative text and standard programming methods to examine structured SBSPI templates from 2010-2022.
Results: Chart reviews found three safety planning practices documented in narrative notes that were delivered to at least half of patients at risk: professional contacts, lethal means counseling for firearms, and lethal means counseling for medication access/storage. NLP methods were developed to identify these practices in clinical text with high levels of accuracy (Sensitivity, Specificity, & PPV ≥ 82%). Among visits with a high-risk CSSRS, 40% (Range 2-73% by health system) had an SBSPI template within 1 year of implementation.
Conclusions: This is one of the first reports describing development of measures that leverage electronic health records to track use of suicide prevention safety plans. There are opportunities to use the methods developed here in future evaluations of safety planning.
{"title":"Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation.","authors":"Jennifer M Boggs, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Erica M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Arne Beck, Cambria Bruschke, Stuart Buttlaire, Karen J Coleman, Jean P Flores, Robert Penfold, J David Powers, Julie Angerhofer Richards, Laura Richardson, Arthur Runkle, Jacqueline M Ryan, Gregory E Simon, Stacy Sterling, Christine Stewart, Scott Stumbo, LeeAnn M Quintana, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Brian K Ahmedani","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Safety planning for suicide prevention is an important quality metric for Zero Suicide implementation. We describe the development, validation, and application of electronic health record (EHR) programs to measure uptake of safety planning practices across six integrated healthcare systems as part of a Zero Suicide evaluation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Safety planning was documented in narrative notes and structured EHR templates using the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention (SBSPI) in response to a high-risk cutoff score on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics were developed and validated using chart review to characterize practices documented in narrative notes. We applied NLP to measure frequency of documentation in the narrative text and standard programming methods to examine structured SBSPI templates from 2010-2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chart reviews found three safety planning practices documented in narrative notes that were delivered to at least half of patients at risk: professional contacts, lethal means counseling for firearms, and lethal means counseling for medication access/storage. NLP methods were developed to identify these practices in clinical text with high levels of accuracy (Sensitivity, Specificity, & PPV ≥ 82%). Among visits with a high-risk CSSRS, 40% (Range 2-73% by health system) had an SBSPI template within 1 year of implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the first reports describing development of measures that leverage electronic health records to track use of suicide prevention safety plans. There are opportunities to use the methods developed here in future evaluations of safety planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293
Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Adam C Jaroszewski, Joseph S Maimone, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Erin N Kilbury, Michelle B Stein, Stuart Beck, Jeff C Huffman, Matthew K Nock
The weeks following an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization are known to be the highest-risk time for suicide. Interventions are needed that are well-matched to the dynamic nature of suicidal thoughts and easily implementable during this high-risk time. We sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel registered clinical trial that combined three brief in-person sessions to teach core cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills during hospitalization followed by smartphone-based ecological momentary intervention (EMI) to facilitate real-time practice of the emotion management skills during the 28 days after hospital discharge. Results from this pilot study (N = 26) supported some aspects of feasibility and acceptability. Regarding feasibility, 14.7% of all screened inpatients met study eligibility criteria. Half (50.3%) of those who were ineligible were ineligible because they were not part of the population for whom this treatment was designed (e.g., symptoms such as psychosis rendered them ineligible for the current study). Those who were otherwise eligible based on symptoms were primarily ineligible due to inpatient stays that were too short. Nearly half (48%) of study participants did not receive all three in-person sessions during their hospitalization. Among enrolled participants, rates of engagement with the smartphone-based assessment and EMI prompts were 51.47%. Regarding acceptability, quantitative and qualitative data supported the perceived acceptability of the intervention, and provided recommendations for future iterations. Well-powered effectiveness (and effectiveness-implementation) studies are needed to determine the effects of this promising and highly scalable intervention approach.
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of an Ecological Momentary Intervention for Managing Emotional Distress Among Psychiatric Inpatients at Risk for Suicide.","authors":"Evan M Kleiman, Kate H Bentley, Adam C Jaroszewski, Joseph S Maimone, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Erin N Kilbury, Michelle B Stein, Stuart Beck, Jeff C Huffman, Matthew K Nock","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2391293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The weeks following an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization are known to be the highest-risk time for suicide. Interventions are needed that are well-matched to the dynamic nature of suicidal thoughts and easily implementable during this high-risk time. We sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel registered clinical trial that combined three brief in-person sessions to teach core cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills during hospitalization followed by smartphone-based ecological momentary intervention (EMI) to facilitate real-time practice of the emotion management skills during the 28 days after hospital discharge. Results from this pilot study (<i>N</i> = 26) supported some aspects of feasibility and acceptability. Regarding feasibility, 14.7% of all screened inpatients met study eligibility criteria. Half (50.3%) of those who were ineligible were ineligible because they were not part of the population for whom this treatment was designed (e.g., symptoms such as psychosis rendered them ineligible for the current study). Those who were otherwise eligible based on symptoms were primarily ineligible due to inpatient stays that were too short. Nearly half (48%) of study participants did not receive all three in-person sessions during their hospitalization. Among enrolled participants, rates of engagement with the smartphone-based assessment and EMI prompts were 51.47%. Regarding acceptability, quantitative and qualitative data supported the perceived acceptability of the intervention, and provided recommendations for future iterations. Well-powered effectiveness (and effectiveness-implementation) studies are needed to determine the effects of this promising and highly scalable intervention approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142054776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671
Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz
Objective: Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.
Method: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.
Results: After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.
Conclusions: There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.
{"title":"The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142054785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.
Method: A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.
Results: Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.
Conclusions: The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.
{"title":"The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode.","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Yaakov Wahl, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666
Kirsten Pauwels, Eva De Jaegere, Patrick Vanderreydt, Silke Aerts, Eva Vande Gaer, Gwendolyn Portzky
Objective: Worldwide helplines are considered an important part of suicide prevention strategies. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the impact of suicide prevention helplines on the suicidality of its users remains limited and is frequently confronted with methodological issues. This study aimed to assess the impact of crisis calls on callers' levels of crisis and suicidality both immediately after the call and at follow-up compared to before the call. After the call, the satisfaction of the callers with the intervention was also assessed.
Methods: A pre-post study, generated automatically by a telephone system, was conducted in order to compare the level of crisis and suicidality (operationalized by five indicators: hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent, and social support) experienced by callers before and immediately after the call and at follow-up (one to two weeks after the call).
Results: Callers (n = 487) showed significant improvement in their level of crisis (p < .001, d = -0.31), hopelessness (p < .001, d = -0.22), entrapment (p < .001, d = -0.25), suicide intent (p < .001, d = -0.37), and social support (p < .001, d = 0.33) after the call compared to before the call. Improvements were also found at follow-up compared to pretest. The satisfaction of callers with the helpline was high.
Conclusions: This study adds to the growing evidence on suicide prevention helplines and addresses some important methodological issues in helpline research. Furthermore, it shows promising results regarding the potential supportive impact of helplines on callers who feel suicidal.
目的:全球范围内的帮助热线被认为是预防自杀策略的重要组成部分。然而,有关预防自杀求助热线对其用户自杀倾向的影响的证据仍然有限,而且经常遇到方法问题。本研究旨在评估危机呼叫对呼叫者危机感和自杀倾向水平的影响,包括呼叫后的即时影响以及与呼叫前相比的后续影响。通话结束后,还评估了来电者对干预措施的满意度:方法: 通过电话系统自动生成的一项事前事后研究,比较来电者在通话前、通话后和随访时(通话后一至两周)所经历的危机和自杀程度(通过五项指标进行操作:绝望、困顿、可控性、自杀意向和社会支持):与呼叫前相比,呼叫者(n = 487)在呼叫后的危机感(p d = -0.31)、绝望感(p d = -0.22)、束缚感(p d = -0.25)、自杀意向(p d = -0.37)和社会支持(p d = 0.33)方面均有明显改善。与测试前相比,随访结果也有所改善。来电者对求助热线的满意度很高:这项研究补充了有关预防自杀帮助热线的越来越多的证据,并解决了帮助热线研究中一些重要的方法问题。此外,该研究还显示了帮助热线对有自杀倾向的求助者可能产生的支持性影响。
{"title":"Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality.","authors":"Kirsten Pauwels, Eva De Jaegere, Patrick Vanderreydt, Silke Aerts, Eva Vande Gaer, Gwendolyn Portzky","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Worldwide helplines are considered an important part of suicide prevention strategies. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the impact of suicide prevention helplines on the suicidality of its users remains limited and is frequently confronted with methodological issues. This study aimed to assess the impact of crisis calls on callers' levels of crisis and suicidality both immediately after the call and at follow-up compared to before the call. After the call, the satisfaction of the callers with the intervention was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post study, generated automatically by a telephone system, was conducted in order to compare the level of crisis and suicidality (operationalized by five indicators: hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent, and social support) experienced by callers before and immediately after the call and at follow-up (one to two weeks after the call).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Callers (n = 487) showed significant improvement in their level of crisis (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.31), hopelessness (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.22), entrapment (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.25), suicide intent (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -0.37), and social support (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 0.33) after the call compared to before the call. Improvements were also found at follow-up compared to pretest. The satisfaction of callers with the helpline was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adds to the growing evidence on suicide prevention helplines and addresses some important methodological issues in helpline research. Furthermore, it shows promising results regarding the potential supportive impact of helplines on callers who feel suicidal.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}