BMC Cancer最新文献

Background: The Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS), an innovative scoring system, has emerged as a promising biomarker for predicting patient outcomes following cancer therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the value of SIPS as a prognostic indicator following hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: This retrospective study included 693 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy. Survival outcomes were compared between propensity score-matched groups. Independent prognostic factors were identified through Cox regression analysis. Additionally, both traditional Cox proportional hazards models and machine learning models based on the SIPS were developed and validated.

Results: A total of 693 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy were included, with 102 in the high SIPS group and 591 in the low SIPS group. Following propensity score matching (1:3 ratio), both groups achieved balance, with 82 patients in the high SIPS group and 240 patients in the low SIPS group. The low SIPS group demonstrated significantly superior recurrence-free survival (RFS) (25 months vs. 21 months; P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (69 months vs. 58 months; P < 0.001) compared to the high SIPS group. Multivariable analysis identified SIPS as an independent adverse factor affecting both RFS and OS. The calibration curve for overall patient survival diagnosis displayed excellent predictive accuracy. Traditional COX prognostic models and machine learning models incorporating SIPS demonstrated excellent performance both the training and validation set.

Conclusion: This study confirms the prognostic significance of SIPS in post-hepatectomy HCC patients, providing a practical tool for risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Further research and validation are needed to consolidate its role in prognostic assessment.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and EGFR-TKI combination treatments have become the standard first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the best option has yet to be determined. This study compares the efficacy and safety of various first-line EGFR-TKI monotherapies and combination treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials databases, and several international conferences to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on first-line EGFR-TKI treatments for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The study quality was assessed using the revised tool for risk of bias in randomized trials. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the included treatments were compared by network meta-analysis based on a frequentist approach.

Results: We identified 26 trials (8,359 patients) investigating 14 treatment groups, including first, second, and third-generation EGFR-TKIs and their combination treatments. Osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab showed the highest efficacy in improving progression-free survival. New third-generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated comparable efficacy to osimertinib alone but did not surpass it. Subgroup analyses revealed slight variation in treatment efficacy based on mutation types and patient demographics. Combination treatments were associated with a higher incidence of adverse events.

Conclusion: These results reveal that osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab are superior first-line options for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, these combinations are associated with higher adverse event rates.

Background: Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common malignant renal tumor in children. This study investigated the clinical features, pathological findings, and outcomes of children with malignant renal tumors in Southern Iran. Factors associated with recurrence and mortality were assessed.

Methods: Electronic files of children with malignant renal tumors from 2009 to 2023 were reviewed. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were reported.

Results: Eighty-three patients (44 males) with a median age of 40 months (range: 3-122) were included. WT was the most common pathological variant (94%). Anaplasia was found in 17.3% of patients. Upfront chemotherapy followed by nephrectomy was performed in 54.2% of the patients. Ten patients (12%) experienced relapse, and five patients (6%) died during the 14-year follow-up. The 5-year OS and EFS were 90.75% (95% CI, 78.64-96.16%) and 81.9% (95% CI, 70.10-89.38%), respectively, and were comparable between the two treatment strategies (upfront chemotherapy vs. upfront nephrectomy). Metastasis and residual disease were associated with relapse, whereas tumor recurrence was the only predictive factor of survival.

Conclusion: WT is a curable disease with excellent outcomes if diagnosed and treated promptly. The timing of nephrectomy does not affect OS and EFS. Patients with low-stage tumors and those with complete surgical excision are at a lower risk of tumor recurrence. Relapse is the primary risk factor for death.

Background: Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) is a treatment for preventing febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with early breast cancer. However, the optimal injection timing of PEG-rhG-CSF after chemotherapy is obscure. The trial was designed to explore the best administration timing of PEG-rhG-CSF when breast cancer patients could benefit most.

Methods: Patients with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive a preventive injection on the 7th or 3rd day following chemotherapy. The experimental group (n = 80) received PEG-rhG-CSF treatment on day 7 after chemotherapy, whereas the control group (n = 80) received it on day 3. The occurrence of grades 3-4 neutropenia and FN in the first cycle was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was the frequency of PEG-rhG-CSF dose reduction.

Results: In comparison to the control group, the experimental group exhibited higher white blood cell count (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) on the 9th and 13th days following chemotherapy (P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly lower in the experimental group (P = 0.038). Furthermore, a greater proportion of patients in the experimental group met the criteria for reducing the PEG-rhG-CSF dose compared to the control group (69.74% vs. 35.06%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In comparison with PEG-rhG-CSF injection on day 3 after chemotherapy, the incidence of grade 3-4 myelosuppression is lower, and the safety is more manageable after the injection on day 7. This approach potentially allows for a wider adoption of PEG-rhG-CSF dose reduction, leading to a consequential decrease in overall medical costs for patients.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials: NCT04477616. Registered July 16, 2020.

Background: In ovarian cancer frequently reported side effects are muscle wasting and malnutrition, leading to frailty, decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Both often begin during first-line chemotherapy and develop progressively into a refractory state, if left untreated.

Method: Primary objective is to evaluate effectiveness of a newly developed app-based exercise and nutrition program under non-standardized conditions of clinical routine. We hypothize that patients who receive an individually tailored exercise and nutrition program for six months will have improved physical performance compared to patients who receive usual care. This is a multicenter randomized controlled open-label trial comparing an intervention group receiving a six-month exercise and nutrition intervention and a control group receiving usual care. Primary endpoint is the change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) from baseline to T2 (26 weeks after baseline) as a measure of physical functioning. Secondary endpoints include patients' utilization and adherence to the nutrition program (MEDAS), their malnutrition risk (NRS2002), as well as patients' HRQoL (see Table 1). Using the two-sample t-test with a two-sided type I error of 5% and 80% power, a medium effect size of Cohen's d = 0.50 can be demonstrated with a minimum of 128 participants (64 per group). With a conservatively estimated dropout rate of 30%, 182 patients will be recruited. Patients who are included must be over 18 years of age, be diagnosed with ovarian cancer, cancer of fallopian tubes, or peritoneal cancer, FIGO stages II-IV, receive surgery and chemotherapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant). Exclusion criteria are an ECOG status greater than 2, inadequate proficiency in German, or physical or mental impairments hindering the implementation of the program or execution of study procedures.

Discussion: In case of success, the project contributes in the long term to (i) improving medical care (diagnosis, psychoeducation, patient orientation, and empowerment), (ii) reducing the burden of disease and promoting physical autonomy for patients, and (iii) being incorporated into relevant guidelines.

Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06250686).

Background: This study aims to investigate a novel instrument OM-100 with low-frequency magnetic fields (LFMFs) for its potential applicability in the treatment of liver cancer.

Methods: Liver cancer cell lines (HepG2 and Huh7) and normal liver cell line THLE-2 were exposed to OM-100 at LFMFs of 0, 10, 25, 50, and 100 kHz for 2 h in the morning, noon, and evening, respectively. The effects of LFMF on cell viability, apoptosis, migration, and invasion capabilities were examined. Additionally, impacts of LFMF on ROS production was assessed. In vivo studies were conducted to examine the safety profile of OM-100 and its effects on tumor growth.

Results: In vitro, OM-100 reduced the viability of liver cancer cells, increased cell apoptosis, and inhibited cell migration and invasion abilities in a frequency-dependent manner (P < 0.05). In vivo, OM-100 significantly slowed down tumor growth and promoted apoptosis in liver tumors (P < 0.05). Moreover, OM-100 rarely affected the viability of normal liver cells, as well as the health of normal mice. Finally, we further found that OM-100 significantly increased the production of ROS in liver cancer cells (P < 0.05), a key factor in inducing autophagy, which is very important for the progression of liver cancer.

Conclusion: Our findings reveal the safety of OM-100 and its frequency at 100 kHz significantly inhibits liver cancer progression.

Objective: To compare the performance of [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 in PET/CT evaluation for liver cancer lesions, with a further exploration of the associations between PET semiquantitative data and immunohistochemical markers to liver cancer.

Methods: Patients with suspected malignant liver lesions (MLL) underwent [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 PET/CT scanning. Liver lesions were visually classified as positive or negative based on their uptake level exceeding that of adjacent normal liver tissue. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were recorded for semi-quantitative analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each tracer were determined using pathological findings as the gold standard. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis provided the molecular characteristics of all MLLs. Comprehensive analysis explored correlations between these molecular markers and PET semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax andTBR) to identify potential associations.

Results: The study enrolled 44 patients, with 39 confirmed cases of MLL, comprising 28 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and 11 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC). For MLL detection, [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 and [¹⁸F]FDG exhibited sensitivities of 84.6% (33/39) and 76.9% (30/39), specificitiesy of 60% (3/5) and 100%(5/5), and accuracy of 81.8% (36/44) and 79.5%(35/44). Across all liver lesions, [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 significantly surpassed [¹⁸F]FDG in SUVmax(10.54 ± 6.72 VS. 7.68 ± 6.79) and TBR(4.35 ± 3.78 Vs. 3.17 ± 3.05). Notably, [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 displayed markebly elevated SUVmax in benign liver lesions (BLLs) (P = 0.032), HCCs (P = 0.005), and ICCs (P = 0.011). Lesions with hepatocyte negativity (P = 0.023), CD34 negativity(P = 0.044), and high Ki67 expression (> 30%) (P = 0.001) had higher SUVmax on [¹⁸F]FAPI-04. Additionally, ARG-1-negative lesions demonstrated higher TBR on [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 than ARG-1-positive lesions(P = 0.018). No significant SUVmax/TBR differences were observed with [¹⁸F]FDG based on these markers. A linear relationship was identified between Ki67 scores and SUVmax of [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 (R = 0.603, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: [¹⁸F]FAPI-04 exhibits superior performance over [¹⁸F]FDG in PET/CT evaluation of liver cancer, characterized by increased sensitivity and SUVmax/TBR. Significant correlations with molecular markers, including Ki67, suggest [¹⁸F]FAPI-04's potential for characterizing liver cancer subtypes and assessing tumor proliferation. However, further research is required to validate these findings and their clinical significance.

Trial registration: NCT05485792, Registered 01 August 2022.

Background: The European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has recently developed and validated a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for sexual health (SH) in cancer patients. Here, we present results from a secondary analysis of the EORTC QLQ-SH22 validation study. The objective was to investigate the impact of cancer treatment on SH over the disease trajectory into survivorship in patients who underwent curative treatment.

Methods: Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-SH22 and the EORTC QLQ-C30 assessing SH and Quality of Life. We analyzed differences in SH of patients on active cancer treatment compared to patients off-treatment (cross sectional group comparison) as well as changes in SH during the course of treatment (from pre-treatment to follow-up).

Results: Our sample consisted of n = 394 (66.2% females) curatively treated cancer patients with 34% of patients being on-treatment and 66% of patients being in their follow-up after primary treatment (off-treatment group). Compared to patients off- treatment, patients on active cancer treatment experienced less sexual satisfaction (p = .021, Cohen's d = .36) and libido (p < .001, d = .60) and had higher levels of fatigue (p < .001, d = .50). Importance of sexual activity, masculinity and femininity did not differ between groups. Treatment effects on sexual activity decreased with treatment completion (p < .001, d = .50). Patients undergoing intensified treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, or endocrine treatment) reported more treatment effects (subscale EORTC QLQ-SH22) compared to patients undergoing surgery only.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the negative impact of oncological treatment on SH and how increasing treatment intensity further impair SH. Sexual satisfaction and libido improve after treatment completion while other aspects (e.g. masculinity/femininity) do not change during survivorship. We suggest monitoring of SH from the start of cancer treatment on and beyond into survivorship using PROMs as part of routine cancer care. Routine monitoring allows systematic identification of patient's SH problems and may improve awareness as well as target intervention for those in need of care.

Background: Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) variant is an independent prognostic factor for worse prognosis in patients with lung cancer or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. MET gene variants can be regarded as a subtype of melanoma but there is a lack of studies regarding the frequency of MET genetic alterations and the efficacy of immunotherapy in melanoma patients. The purpose of this study is to explore potential therapeutic strategies for melanoma subtypes with MET alterations.

Methods: A total of 1751 malignant melanomas were analyzed to illustrate the landscape of MET mutations. We collected 55 melanoma cases from multicenter for a retrospective cohort from 2010 to 2023. We analyzed the impact of MET amplification on the efficacy of immunotherapy in the retrospective cohort after propensity score matching (PSM) and a pancancer cohort. CIBERSORT was used to evaluate the immune infiltration.

Results: There were no instances of MET 14 exon skipping, and only instances of MET amplification were found in the 1751 melanomas and our retrospective cohort. Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that MET amplification (P = 0.006) was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) in patients who received immunotherapy as the first-line treatment. Compared with patients with MET amplification, patients in the negative control (NC) group had a significantly better OS (P = 0.022) after PSM. Analysis of 1661 pancancer cases with the MSK-IMPACT assay showed that patients receiving immunotherapy in the MET amplification group had a trend toward worse OS than those without MET amplification (P = 0.025).

Conclusions: This database analysis showed that the main type of MET mutation is amplification in malignant melanoma. MET-amplified solid tumors might be considered for targeted therapy, as MET amplification can be regarded as a risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with tumors treated with immunotherapy.