Objective: To evaluate the performance of Ghana's environmental surveillance (ES) system for poliovirus (PV) detection from 2018 to 2022 using standardised indicators developed by the WHO and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Design: A retrospective performance evaluation using 10 key indicators benchmarked against global targets for PV surveillance.
Setting: Seven regions across Ghana, participating in the national ES programme implemented under the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.
Surveillance coverage: Wastewater sampling was conducted at designated ES sites, supported by field collection teams and laboratory personnel responsible for sample acquisition, processing and reporting of PV detection results.
Outcome measures: Detection rates of PV and non-polio enteroviruses (NPEVs), timeliness of sample collection and reporting, data quality and system stability.
Results: A total of 738 wastewater samples were collected. The system demonstrated high sensitivity, detecting circulating vaccine-derived PV type 2 in 51 (6.9%) of samples, Sabin PV types 1 and 3 in 61 (9.5%) and 114 (17.8%), respectively, and NPEVs in 491 (66.5%) of samples. Over 80% of samples met the recommended 21-day collection-to-reporting time frame. Data quality exceeded the ≥80% threshold, and workflows remained stable throughout the evaluation period.
Conclusions: Ghana's ES system for PV was found to be flexible, stable and effective in generating high-quality data for early detection and public health response. These findings underscore the system's critical role in supporting polio eradication efforts and highlight its potential as a model for surveillance in similar settings.
{"title":"Effectiveness of poliovirus environmental surveillance in Ghana: an indicator-based performance evaluation across seven regions, 2018-2022.","authors":"Evangeline Obodai, Nana Afia Asante Ntim, Ewurabena Oduma Duker, Emmanuel Gberbi, Comfort Nuamah Antwi, Jude Yayra Mensah, Deborah Odame, Jessica Dufie Boakye, Sharon Ansong Bimpong, Gayheart Deladem Agbotse, Nancy Odoom, Patience Lartekai Adams, Nana Kobina Acquah, Angelina Evelyn Dickson, Christabel Odoom, Kwame Kodom Achempem, Isaac Baffoe-Nyarko, Godfred Egbi, Dennis Laryea, Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe, John Kofi Odoom","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of Ghana's environmental surveillance (ES) system for poliovirus (PV) detection from 2018 to 2022 using standardised indicators developed by the WHO and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective performance evaluation using 10 key indicators benchmarked against global targets for PV surveillance.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seven regions across Ghana, participating in the national ES programme implemented under the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.</p><p><strong>Surveillance coverage: </strong>Wastewater sampling was conducted at designated ES sites, supported by field collection teams and laboratory personnel responsible for sample acquisition, processing and reporting of PV detection results.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Detection rates of PV and non-polio enteroviruses (NPEVs), timeliness of sample collection and reporting, data quality and system stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 738 wastewater samples were collected. The system demonstrated high sensitivity, detecting circulating vaccine-derived PV type 2 in 51 (6.9%) of samples, Sabin PV types 1 and 3 in 61 (9.5%) and 114 (17.8%), respectively, and NPEVs in 491 (66.5%) of samples. Over 80% of samples met the recommended 21-day collection-to-reporting time frame. Data quality exceeded the ≥80% threshold, and workflows remained stable throughout the evaluation period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ghana's ES system for PV was found to be flexible, stable and effective in generating high-quality data for early detection and public health response. These findings underscore the system's critical role in supporting polio eradication efforts and highlight its potential as a model for surveillance in similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e109733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111644
Stefan Floren, Daniel Segelcke, Philipp André Macháček, Jan Vollert, Heike Norda, Iben Rohde, Ian Gilron, Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn
Introduction: Postoperative pain is common, with approximately one-third of surgical patients experiencing severe acute pain and 10-20% developing chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). Evidence shows that female patients are at higher risk of pain after sex non-specific surgery, thus sex- or gender-specific differences in pain treatment efficacy with potential consequences for perioperative pain management are to be expected. Considering the clinical and societal burden of poorly managed postoperative pain, the GEPard project comprises two systematic reviews, GEPard 1: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in efficacy of perioperative pain management for certain (major) surgical procedures in adult patients; and GEPard 2: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in the dosing, efficacy and adverse effects of the most common systemic perioperative non-opioid- and co-analgesics across all sex non-specific surgical procedures in adult patients.
Methods and analysis: The reviews will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and PsycINFO will be searched. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses reporting outcomes disaggregated by sex and/or gender in adult surgical patients. For GEPard 1, this applies to selected major surgical procedures; for GEPard 2, to all non-sex-specific surgical procedures. Interventions include regional anaesthesia, systemic analgesics and psychological strategies for GEPard 1 and non-opioid- as well as co-analgesics for GEPard 2. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract the data. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (RoB 2) and AMSTAR 2 tools will assess study quality. Random-effects or Bayesian meta-analyses will be performed where possible; otherwise, narrative synthesis will be applied. GRADE methodology will assess evidence certainty.
Ethics and dissemination: No ethical approval is required for these reviews. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, patient organisations and professional societies. Data will be shared via Zenodo or Open Science Framework (OSF), following FAIR principles.
Prospero registration number: The systematic review protocols for both reviews have been registered in PROSPERO on 29 August 2025 (Registration-ID: CRD420251121393 (GEPard1), CRD420251121536 (GEPard2).
{"title":"Study protocols for the GEPard project: systematic analysis of sex- and gender-specific differences in the efficacy of perioperative pain management - a two-pronged approach.","authors":"Stefan Floren, Daniel Segelcke, Philipp André Macháček, Jan Vollert, Heike Norda, Iben Rohde, Ian Gilron, Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative pain is common, with approximately one-third of surgical patients experiencing severe acute pain and 10-20% developing chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). Evidence shows that female patients are at higher risk of pain after sex non-specific surgery, thus sex- or gender-specific differences in pain treatment efficacy with potential consequences for perioperative pain management are to be expected. Considering the clinical and societal burden of poorly managed postoperative pain, the GEPard project comprises two systematic reviews, GEPard 1: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in efficacy of perioperative pain management for certain (major) surgical procedures in adult patients; and GEPard 2: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in the dosing, efficacy and adverse effects of the most common systemic perioperative non-opioid- and co-analgesics across all sex non-specific surgical procedures in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The reviews will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and PsycINFO will be searched. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses reporting outcomes disaggregated by sex and/or gender in adult surgical patients. For GEPard 1, this applies to selected major surgical procedures; for GEPard 2, to all non-sex-specific surgical procedures. Interventions include regional anaesthesia, systemic analgesics and psychological strategies for GEPard 1 and non-opioid- as well as co-analgesics for GEPard 2. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract the data. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (RoB 2) and AMSTAR 2 tools will assess study quality. Random-effects or Bayesian meta-analyses will be performed where possible; otherwise, narrative synthesis will be applied. GRADE methodology will assess evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>No ethical approval is required for these reviews. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, patient organisations and professional societies. Data will be shared via Zenodo or Open Science Framework (OSF), following FAIR principles.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>The systematic review protocols for both reviews have been registered in PROSPERO on 29 August 2025 (Registration-ID: CRD420251121393 (GEPard1), CRD420251121536 (GEPard2).</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e111644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112173
Vicente Jimenez-Fanco, Jahir Rodriguez Rivera, Carlos Jerjes-Sanchez, Mauricio Castillo Perez, Monica Flores Zertuche, Erasmo De La Peña, Guillermo Torre-Amione, Andres Gerardo Peña-Blade, Renata Quevedo-Salazar, Manuel Odin De Los Ríos, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza, Jose Antonio Magaña Serrano, Gustavo Rojas Velasco, Javier Antezana, Lecsy Macedo, Jose Luis Leiva-Pons
Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome characterised by primary cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in therapeutic options such as mechanical cardiac support, it remains associated with high mortality. Although previous registries have described heterogeneous populations and outcomes across different centres, contemporary real-world data on management practices remain limited. This gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries, where there is no robust registry that clearly defines the current state of CS management. Therefore, a multicentre registry is needed to better characterise current practices and outcomes. Our study aims to gain insight into current therapeutic trends in Mexico, a low- to middle-income country with a significant cardiovascular disease burden.
Methods and analysis: The Mexican Registry of Cardiogenic Shock is a quality initiative that aims to identify therapeutic trends, demographic characteristics and clinical presentations. It also aims to evaluate outcomes, including mortality and cognitive function at in-hospital and 1-year follow-ups, and to identify areas for improvement in the care process across the broad spectrum of CS.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval for this multicentre study was obtained from the local research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated to all participating institutions in the form of summary reports and presentations on completion of the analysis.
{"title":"Rationale and design of the REMECHOQUE multicentre registry protocol: evaluating therapeutic trends in cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Vicente Jimenez-Fanco, Jahir Rodriguez Rivera, Carlos Jerjes-Sanchez, Mauricio Castillo Perez, Monica Flores Zertuche, Erasmo De La Peña, Guillermo Torre-Amione, Andres Gerardo Peña-Blade, Renata Quevedo-Salazar, Manuel Odin De Los Ríos, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza, Jose Antonio Magaña Serrano, Gustavo Rojas Velasco, Javier Antezana, Lecsy Macedo, Jose Luis Leiva-Pons","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome characterised by primary cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in therapeutic options such as mechanical cardiac support, it remains associated with high mortality. Although previous registries have described heterogeneous populations and outcomes across different centres, contemporary real-world data on management practices remain limited. This gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries, where there is no robust registry that clearly defines the current state of CS management. Therefore, a multicentre registry is needed to better characterise current practices and outcomes. Our study aims to gain insight into current therapeutic trends in Mexico, a low- to middle-income country with a significant cardiovascular disease burden.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The Mexican Registry of Cardiogenic Shock is a quality initiative that aims to identify therapeutic trends, demographic characteristics and clinical presentations. It also aims to evaluate outcomes, including mortality and cognitive function at in-hospital and 1-year follow-ups, and to identify areas for improvement in the care process across the broad spectrum of CS.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval for this multicentre study was obtained from the local research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated to all participating institutions in the form of summary reports and presentations on completion of the analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e112173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To identify behavioural and household factors associated with poor oral hygiene among Japanese kindergarten children in a population with high health awareness, using the Debris Index-Simplified (DI-S) as a clinical proxy for early oral hygiene deterioration.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Seven kindergartens in Sapporo city, Japan.
Participants: Of the 1229 kindergarten children invited, 871 provided parental consent (consent rate: 70.9%). Among them, 675 children aged 1-6 years who completed both the questionnaire and oral examination (completion rate: 54.9%). Most post-consent losses were due to logistical and staffing constraints. Children were stratified into ≤3 year and ≥4 year academic classes.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was oral hygiene status based on the DI-S scores (categorised as good (DI-S=0) or poor (DI-S>0). The secondary outcome was the presence of dental caries, defined as decayed, missing and filled primary teeth: dmft≥1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate associations between poor oral hygiene and behavioural and household factors.
Results: Among the 675 children, 168 children (24.9%) exhibited poor oral hygiene (DI-S>0) and 89 children (13.2%) had dental caries (dmft≥1). In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic, dental and dietary variables, poor oral hygiene was significantly associated with being from a multiple-child household (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.42) and irregular juice consumption (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.38). Age-stratified analysis revealed that these associations persisted among those in the ≥4 year class, with additional significance for infrequent tooth brushing (<2 times/day; OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.00 to 3.26). Sensitivity analysis using dmft revealed that the significant associations differed: male sex, age and irregular snacking were significant, while household composition and juice consumption were not.
Conclusions: In a high health awareness Japanese preschool population, poor oral hygiene was independently associated with household composition and juice consumption, rather than traditional dental behaviours. These findings suggest the need to broaden preventive strategies beyond routine dental guidance to include family structure and dietary patterns, particularly in low-prevalence settings. Differential associations between DI-S and caries experience emphasise the utility of early clinical indices in oral health promotion.
目的:利用碎片指数简化(DI-S)作为早期口腔卫生恶化的临床指标,在健康意识较高的日本幼儿园儿童中,确定与口腔卫生不良相关的行为和家庭因素。设计:横断面研究。背景:日本札幌市的七所幼儿园。参与对象:1229名被邀请的幼儿园儿童中,871名提供了家长同意,同意率为70.9%。其中,675名1-6岁儿童完成了问卷和口试,完成率为54.9%。大多数同意后的损失是由于后勤和人员限制造成的。将儿童分为≤3年级和≥4年级两组。主要和次要结局指标:主要结局是基于DI-S评分的口腔卫生状况(分为良好(DI-S=0)或较差(DI-S>)。次要结果是龋的存在,定义为龋坏,缺失和填充的乳牙:dmft≥1。使用多变量逻辑回归来估计口腔卫生不良与行为和家庭因素之间的关联。结果:675名儿童中,口腔卫生差168名(24.9%),龋(dmft≥1)89名(13.2%)。在调整了人口统计学、牙科和饮食变量的多变量分析中,口腔卫生差与来自多子女家庭(OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16至2.42)和不规律的果汁饮用(OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07至2.38)显著相关。年龄分层分析显示,这些关联在≥4岁的班级中持续存在,并且与不经常刷牙有额外的意义(结论:在健康意识较高的日本学龄前人口中,口腔卫生状况不佳与家庭组成和果汁消费独立相关,而与传统的牙科行为无关。这些发现表明,需要扩大预防策略,超越常规牙科指导,包括家庭结构和饮食模式,特别是在低患病率环境中。DI-S与龋齿经历之间的差异关系强调了早期临床指标在口腔健康促进中的作用。
{"title":"Residual factors associated with poor oral hygiene among Japanese kindergarten children: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Daisuke Oiwa, Asae Oura, Tsugushi Hayashi, Kei Nakata, Mayu Nakata, Masayuki Koyama, Nobuaki Himuro, Hirofumi Ohnishi","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107996","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify behavioural and household factors associated with poor oral hygiene among Japanese kindergarten children in a population with high health awareness, using the Debris Index-Simplified (DI-S) as a clinical proxy for early oral hygiene deterioration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seven kindergartens in Sapporo city, Japan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Of the 1229 kindergarten children invited, 871 provided parental consent (consent rate: 70.9%). Among them, 675 children aged 1-6 years who completed both the questionnaire and oral examination (completion rate: 54.9%). Most post-consent losses were due to logistical and staffing constraints. Children were stratified into ≤3 year and ≥4 year academic classes.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was oral hygiene status based on the DI-S scores (categorised as good (DI-S=0) or poor (DI-S>0). The secondary outcome was the presence of dental caries, defined as decayed, missing and filled primary teeth: dmft≥1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate associations between poor oral hygiene and behavioural and household factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 675 children, 168 children (24.9%) exhibited poor oral hygiene (DI-S>0) and 89 children (13.2%) had dental caries (dmft≥1). In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic, dental and dietary variables, poor oral hygiene was significantly associated with being from a multiple-child household (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.42) and irregular juice consumption (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.38). Age-stratified analysis revealed that these associations persisted among those in the ≥4 year class, with additional significance for infrequent tooth brushing (<2 times/day; OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.00 to 3.26). Sensitivity analysis using dmft revealed that the significant associations differed: male sex, age and irregular snacking were significant, while household composition and juice consumption were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a high health awareness Japanese preschool population, poor oral hygiene was independently associated with household composition and juice consumption, rather than traditional dental behaviours. These findings suggest the need to broaden preventive strategies beyond routine dental guidance to include family structure and dietary patterns, particularly in low-prevalence settings. Differential associations between DI-S and caries experience emphasise the utility of early clinical indices in oral health promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e107996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Robotic rehabilitation on locomotion is a new approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and previous studies showed its feasibility. In this study, we aim to evaluate safety, patient's experience and efficacy of a gait training programme with the Atalante exoskeleton, compared with usual care, on walking ability, functional capacity and other symptoms associated with ALS.
Methods and analysis: EXALS is a monocentric, prospective, interventional, open trial. 20 slowly progressing patients with gait deficits will be recruited. The study is conducted in three phases, each lasting 6 weeks, following the ABA procedure. Phase B represents the intervention phase, during which patients practise their gait training at a rhythm of three sessions/week, as an add-on to usual care. In the two phases A, patients receive usual care with no additional treatment. An evaluation is planned before, in the middle and at the end of each phase. The primary outcome of the study is safety and tolerability of the Atalante exoskeleton. Secondary outcomes include: participants' subjective impact and experience, attitude and motivation, efficacy and interactivity of the exoskeleton, walking ability, functional capacity, spasticity, balance, postural stability, lower limb muscle strength, quality of life, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression. Statistical analyses will include descriptive methods for all variables and adverse events. Quantitative outcomes are analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA (analysis of variance) across the seven visits, with post hoc tests applied when appropriate. Nominal outcomes are evaluated using Cochran's Q test with McNemar pairwise comparisons when significant. Associations between variables are examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Missing data will be replaced using linear interpolation, and sensitivity analyses will be planned. Qualitative interview data are analysed using thematic analysis.
Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the French ethics committee CPP Nord-Ouest I (no. 23.02378.000201). Participant data are anonymised and securely stored in the laboratory's database, accessible only to the research team. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.NCT06199284.
机器人运动康复是治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)的一种新方法,已有研究表明其可行性。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估Atalante外骨骼步态训练方案的安全性、患者体验和有效性,与常规护理相比,在行走能力、功能能力和其他与ALS相关的症状方面。方法与分析:EXALS是一项单中心、前瞻性、介入性、开放性试验。将招募20名进展缓慢的步态缺陷患者。该研究分三个阶段进行,每个阶段持续6周,遵循ABA程序。阶段B代表干预阶段,在此期间,患者以每周三次的节奏练习步态训练,作为常规护理的补充。在A阶段,患者接受常规护理,不接受额外治疗。评估是在每个阶段之前、中间和结束时计划的。该研究的主要结果是Atalante外骨骼的安全性和耐受性。次要结局包括:受试者的主观影响和体验、态度和动机、外骨骼的功效和互动性、行走能力、功能能力、痉挛、平衡、姿势稳定性、下肢肌肉力量、生活质量、疼痛、疲劳、焦虑和抑郁。统计分析将包括对所有变量和不良事件的描述性方法。在七次访问中使用重复测量ANOVA(方差分析)分析定量结果,并在适当时应用事后检验。当显著时,使用Cochran’s Q检验和McNemar两两比较来评估标称结果。变量之间的关联使用Spearman相关系数进行检验。缺失的数据将使用线性插值替换,并计划进行敏感性分析。定性访谈数据采用专题分析进行分析。伦理与传播:本研究获得法国伦理委员会CPP nord - west I (no. 6)批准。23.02378.000201)。参与者的数据是匿名的,并安全地存储在实验室的数据库中,只有研究团队才能访问。研究结果将通过同行评议的期刊和会议进行传播。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of the Atalante exoskeleton in the rehabilitation of French patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective, monocentric, open, uncontrolled, interventional protocol, EXALS.","authors":"Ghida Trad, Timothée Lenglet, Isabelle Ledoux, Giorgia Querin, Sophie Blancho, Véronique Marchand-Pauvert, Jean-Yves Hogrel, Pierre-François Pradat","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic rehabilitation on locomotion is a new approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and previous studies showed its feasibility. In this study, we aim to evaluate safety, patient's experience and efficacy of a gait training programme with the Atalante exoskeleton, compared with usual care, on walking ability, functional capacity and other symptoms associated with ALS.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>EXALS is a monocentric, prospective, interventional, open trial. 20 slowly progressing patients with gait deficits will be recruited. The study is conducted in three phases, each lasting 6 weeks, following the ABA procedure. Phase B represents the intervention phase, during which patients practise their gait training at a rhythm of three sessions/week, as an add-on to usual care. In the two phases A, patients receive usual care with no additional treatment. An evaluation is planned before, in the middle and at the end of each phase. The primary outcome of the study is safety and tolerability of the Atalante exoskeleton. Secondary outcomes include: participants' subjective impact and experience, attitude and motivation, efficacy and interactivity of the exoskeleton, walking ability, functional capacity, spasticity, balance, postural stability, lower limb muscle strength, quality of life, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression. Statistical analyses will include descriptive methods for all variables and adverse events. Quantitative outcomes are analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA (analysis of variance) across the seven visits, with post hoc tests applied when appropriate. Nominal outcomes are evaluated using Cochran's Q test with McNemar pairwise comparisons when significant. Associations between variables are examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Missing data will be replaced using linear interpolation, and sensitivity analyses will be planned. Qualitative interview data are analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study was approved by the French ethics committee CPP Nord-Ouest I (no. 23.02378.000201). Participant data are anonymised and securely stored in the laboratory's database, accessible only to the research team. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.NCT06199284.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e109620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110444
Katherine Kolesnik, Fatima Sheikh, Meghan MacIsaac, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Lisa Schwartz
Introduction: The objective of this scoping review is to identify and describe factors that affect access to post-sepsis care. Considering the burden faced by sepsis survivors, it is important to understand the facilitators and barriers to accessing post-sepsis care to facilitate the design and implementation of patient-centred and equitable pathways to care.
Methods and analysis: This scoping review will include studies that consider individuals who have experienced sepsis and any factors that may affect access to care, including comorbidities, discharge setting and social determinants of health. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, HealthSTAR and Scopus will be conducted. The extracted data will be summarised and presented thematically.
Ethics and dissemination: Approval from a research ethics board is not required for this review as it is a synthesis of information from studies where the primary investigators have already received approval from their respective ethics boards. Once complete, the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be shared to local and national forums.
Trial registration details: This review has been uploaded and registered under Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JMFW2.
{"title":"Factors associated with access to post-sepsis care: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Katherine Kolesnik, Fatima Sheikh, Meghan MacIsaac, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Lisa Schwartz","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110444","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to identify and describe factors that affect access to post-sepsis care. Considering the burden faced by sepsis survivors, it is important to understand the facilitators and barriers to accessing post-sepsis care to facilitate the design and implementation of patient-centred and equitable pathways to care.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This scoping review will include studies that consider individuals who have experienced sepsis and any factors that may affect access to care, including comorbidities, discharge setting and social determinants of health. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, HealthSTAR and Scopus will be conducted. The extracted data will be summarised and presented thematically.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Approval from a research ethics board is not required for this review as it is a synthesis of information from studies where the primary investigators have already received approval from their respective ethics boards. Once complete, the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be shared to local and national forums.</p><p><strong>Trial registration details: </strong>This review has been uploaded and registered under Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JMFW2.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e110444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104334
Esther T van der Werf, Hope Foley, Tristan Carter, Rachel Roberts, Jon Adams, Amie Steel
Objectives: To describe the prevalence and characteristics of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM) practice and product use by the population of the UK providing up-to-date data on the landscape of TCIM use in the UK.
Design, setting and participants: A cross-sectional online survey, administered using the Qualtrics platform, among adults (aged 18 years and over) residing in the UK (England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland). Data were collected between May and October 2024. The 40-item instrument covered four domains: demographics, health status, use of health products and practices, and use of health services. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey responses, and χ² tests were applied to assess associations between participant characteristics and TCIM use. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of TCIM use across four outcome categories (p≤0.05).
Results: The sample (n=1559) was broadly representative of the UK population. Prevalence of any TCIM use over a 12-month period was 65.9% with 19.1% consulting a TCIM practitioner and 63.3% using any TCIM product or practice. Bodywork therapists (massage therapists 9.4%, chiropractors 7.9%, yoga teachers 5.0%) and homeopaths (4.1%) were the most commonly consulted TCIM practitioners and Anthroposophic doctors were the least commonly consulted (2.1%). Among TCIM products, vitamin and mineral supplements were the most commonly used (37.3%) and relaxation or meditation practices were reported by 19.4% of respondents. TCIM users were more likely to be female, identify as Asian or Black, have a chronic disease diagnosis, report good health, possess private health insurance, have a higher education level, be employed (or seeking employment) and sometimes experience financial management difficulties.
Conclusions: There is substantial use of TCIM across the UK adult population and there is a need for more research on integrating TCIM into mainstream healthcare and the National Health Service. Clear strategies are necessary to enhance communication between TCIM and conventional healthcare providers, ensure patient safety and promote person-centred, coordinated models of care.
{"title":"Traditional, integrative and complementary medicine use in the UK population: results of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Esther T van der Werf, Hope Foley, Tristan Carter, Rachel Roberts, Jon Adams, Amie Steel","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the prevalence and characteristics of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM) practice and product use by the population of the UK providing up-to-date data on the landscape of TCIM use in the UK.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey, administered using the Qualtrics platform, among adults (aged 18 years and over) residing in the UK (England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland). Data were collected between May and October 2024. The 40-item instrument covered four domains: demographics, health status, use of health products and practices, and use of health services. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey responses, and χ² tests were applied to assess associations between participant characteristics and TCIM use. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of TCIM use across four outcome categories (p≤0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample (n=1559) was broadly representative of the UK population. Prevalence of any TCIM use over a 12-month period was 65.9% with 19.1% consulting a TCIM practitioner and 63.3% using any TCIM product or practice. Bodywork therapists (massage therapists 9.4%, chiropractors 7.9%, yoga teachers 5.0%) and homeopaths (4.1%) were the most commonly consulted TCIM practitioners and Anthroposophic doctors were the least commonly consulted (2.1%). Among TCIM products, vitamin and mineral supplements were the most commonly used (37.3%) and relaxation or meditation practices were reported by 19.4% of respondents. TCIM users were more likely to be female, identify as Asian or Black, have a chronic disease diagnosis, report good health, possess private health insurance, have a higher education level, be employed (or seeking employment) and sometimes experience financial management difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is substantial use of TCIM across the UK adult population and there is a need for more research on integrating TCIM into mainstream healthcare and the National Health Service. Clear strategies are necessary to enhance communication between TCIM and conventional healthcare providers, ensure patient safety and promote person-centred, coordinated models of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e104334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102715
Srean Chhim, Grace V Ku, Paul Kowal, Vannarath Te, Mony Sorithisey, Chamnab Ngor, Poppy Walton, Khin Thiri Maung, Nawi Ng, Nirmala Naidoo, Ir Por, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Chhorvann Chhea, Heng Sopheab
Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with pre-diabetes and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (UDD) in Cambodia.
Design: This analysis used data from the WHO World Health Survey Plus, which was collected using a cross-sectional design with a GIS-based, three-stage sampling approach. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify key associated factors, based on a significance level of p<0.05.
Setting: Data were collected from all 25 provinces in Cambodia between 12 March 2023 and 31 May 2023.
Participants: 4427 individuals aged 18 years or older, residing in the selected household for at least 6 months in the past year.
Primary outcome measures: Pre-diabetes (Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.7%-6.4%) and UDD (HbA1c≥6.5%), without prior knowledge of having type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Results: The weighted prevalences of pre-diabetes and UDD were 26.4% (95% CI 24.0% to 29.0%) and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9% to 11.0%). Pre-diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas compared with rural areas (adjusted OR, aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4), males (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3), individuals aged 40-49 (aOR=1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4), individuals aged 50+ years group (aOR=2.9, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.6) compared with the 18-39 years group, overweight individuals (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), obese (aOR=2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) and those with elevated total triglycerides (aOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5). Similar risk factors were identified for UDD, with the addition of hypertension (aOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.0) and high waist circumference (aOR=2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.7).
Conclusions: The high prevalence of pre-diabetes and UDD in Cambodia is a pressing public health concern. Urgent and intensive interventions are needed to effectively prevent and manage T2D, particularly among urban residents, older persons and individuals with metabolic risk factors.
目的:本研究旨在确定柬埔寨糖尿病前期和未确诊2型糖尿病(UDD)的患病率和相关因素。设计:本分析使用了世卫组织世界卫生调查附加数据,该数据采用基于地理信息系统的三阶段抽样方法的横断面设计收集。基于pSetting的显著性水平,使用多元逻辑回归来确定关键相关因素:在2023年3月12日至2023年5月31日期间收集了柬埔寨所有25个省份的数据。参与者:4427名18岁或以上的个人,过去一年在选定家庭居住至少6个月。主要结局指标:糖尿病前期(血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c) 5.7%-6.4%)和UDD (HbA1c≥6.5%),之前不知道是否患有2型糖尿病(T2D)。结果:糖尿病前期和UDD的加权患病率分别为26.4% (95% CI 24.0% ~ 29.0%)和9.3% (95% CI 7.9% ~ 11.0%)。城市地区的糖尿病前期患病率高于农村地区(调整后的OR值,aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0至1.4)、男性(aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.3至2.3)、40-49岁人群(aOR=1.8, 95% CI 1.4至2.4)、50岁以上人群(aOR=2.9, 95% CI 2.3至3.6)、超重人群(aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.4至2.0)、肥胖人群(aOR=2.1, 95% CI 1.5至3.0)和总甘油三酯升高人群(aOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1至1.5)。与UDD相似的危险因素是高血压(aOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.3 ~ 2.0)和高腰围(aOR=2.0, 95% CI 1.5 ~ 2.7)。结论:柬埔寨糖尿病前期和UDD的高患病率是一个紧迫的公共卫生问题。需要紧急和强化干预措施,以有效预防和管理T2D,特别是在城市居民、老年人和具有代谢危险因素的个体中。
{"title":"Prevalence and factors associated with pre-diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in Cambodia: cross-sectional study based on the World Health Survey Plus 2023.","authors":"Srean Chhim, Grace V Ku, Paul Kowal, Vannarath Te, Mony Sorithisey, Chamnab Ngor, Poppy Walton, Khin Thiri Maung, Nawi Ng, Nirmala Naidoo, Ir Por, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Chhorvann Chhea, Heng Sopheab","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with pre-diabetes and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (UDD) in Cambodia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This analysis used data from the WHO World Health Survey Plus, which was collected using a cross-sectional design with a GIS-based, three-stage sampling approach. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify key associated factors, based on a significance level of p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were collected from all 25 provinces in Cambodia between 12 March 2023 and 31 May 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>4427 individuals aged 18 years or older, residing in the selected household for at least 6 months in the past year.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>Pre-diabetes (Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.7%-6.4%) and UDD (HbA1c≥6.5%), without prior knowledge of having type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted prevalences of pre-diabetes and UDD were 26.4% (95% CI 24.0% to 29.0%) and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9% to 11.0%). Pre-diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas compared with rural areas (adjusted OR, aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4), males (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3), individuals aged 40-49 (aOR=1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4), individuals aged 50+ years group (aOR=2.9, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.6) compared with the 18-39 years group, overweight individuals (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), obese (aOR=2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) and those with elevated total triglycerides (aOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5). Similar risk factors were identified for UDD, with the addition of hypertension (aOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.0) and high waist circumference (aOR=2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high prevalence of pre-diabetes and UDD in Cambodia is a pressing public health concern. Urgent and intensive interventions are needed to effectively prevent and manage T2D, particularly among urban residents, older persons and individuals with metabolic risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e102715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant challenge in hospital settings, and accurately differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI is crucial for effective management. The fractional excretion of urea (FEUN) has been proposed as a potential biomarker for this purpose, offering an alternative to traditional markers such as fractional excretion of sodium. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FEUN for differentiating intrinsic from prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients.
Designs: We conducted a systematic review and bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The study followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Data sources: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 1 November 2023.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: We included observational studies that focused on patient with AKI and reported FEUN data sufficient to reconstruct a complete 2 × 2 contingency table (true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives) for evaluating its diagnostic accuracy.
Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers extracted data, assessed risk of bias with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and graded certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were calculated; heterogeneity was measured with I². A prespecified subgroup restricted to patients receiving diuretics served as a sensitivity analysis.
Results: 12 studies involving 1240 patients were included, with an overall occurrence rate of intrinsic AKI of 38.8%. FEUN had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.84) and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.87), with positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81), respectively. The SROC curve showed a pooled diagnostic accuracy of 0.83. Heterogeneity was substantial (I²>90%) for sensitivity and specificity. In a diuretic-only subgroup (six studies) specificity rose to 0.87 and heterogeneity declined (I²=56%). Overall certainty of evidence was low owing to inconsistency.
Conclusions: FEUN is a biomarker with moderate diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients. Its application could enhance AKI management; however, the high heterogeneity observed in our study highlights the need for further research to evaluate its utility across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.
Prospero registration number: CRD42024496083.
目的:急性肾损伤(AKI)是医院环境中的重大挑战,准确区分内源性和预防性AKI对于有效治疗至关重要。尿素的分数排泄(FEUN)已被提出作为一种潜在的生物标志物,为传统的标记(如钠的分数排泄)提供了一种替代方法。本研究旨在评估FEUN对住院患者区分内源性AKI和肾性AKI的诊断准确性。设计:我们对诊断准确性研究进行了系统回顾和双变量随机效应荟萃分析。本研究采用分级建议、评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法。数据来源:PubMed, Embase和Cochrane数据库从成立到2023年11月1日检索。入选标准:我们纳入了关注AKI患者的观察性研究,报告的FEUN数据足以重建完整的2 × 2权变表(真阳性、真阴性、假阳性和假阴性),以评估其诊断准确性。数据提取和综合:两位审稿人提取数据,使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法对证据的确定性进行分级。计算合并敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比、总受试者工作特征曲线下面积(SROC);用I²测量异质性。预先指定的亚组仅限于接受利尿剂的患者作为敏感性分析。结果:纳入12项研究,1240例患者,内在性AKI的总发生率为38.8%。FEUN的总敏感性为0.74 (95% CI 0.60 ~ 0.84),特异性为0.78 (95% CI 0.66 ~ 0.87),阳性预测值为0.76 (95% CI 0.68 ~ 0.83),阴性预测值为0.74 (95% CI 0.66 ~ 0.81)。SROC曲线显示合并诊断准确率为0.83。在敏感性和特异性方面存在很大的异质性(I²>90%)。在只使用利尿剂的亚组(6项研究)中,特异性上升到 0.87,异质性下降(I²=56%)。由于不一致,证据的总体确定性较低。结论:FEUN是一种具有中等诊断准确性的生物标志物,可用于区分住院患者的内源性和肾前性AKI。它的应用可以加强AKI的管理;然而,在我们的研究中观察到的高度异质性突出了进一步研究的必要性,以评估其在不同患者群体和临床环境中的效用。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024496083。
{"title":"Assessing the utility of fractional excretion of urea in distinguishing intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Heng-Chih Pan, Zheng-Hong Jiang, Hsing-Yu Chen, Jung-Hua Liu, Yu-Wei Chen, Kang-Yung Peng, Vin-Cent Wu, Ching-Chung Hsiao","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100875","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100875","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant challenge in hospital settings, and accurately differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI is crucial for effective management. The fractional excretion of urea (FEUN) has been proposed as a potential biomarker for this purpose, offering an alternative to traditional markers such as fractional excretion of sodium. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FEUN for differentiating intrinsic from prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The study followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 1 November 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: </strong>We included observational studies that focused on patient with AKI and reported FEUN data sufficient to reconstruct a complete 2 × 2 contingency table (true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives) for evaluating its diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Two reviewers extracted data, assessed risk of bias with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and graded certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were calculated; heterogeneity was measured with I². A prespecified subgroup restricted to patients receiving diuretics served as a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 studies involving 1240 patients were included, with an overall occurrence rate of intrinsic AKI of 38.8%. FEUN had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.84) and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.87), with positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81), respectively. The SROC curve showed a pooled diagnostic accuracy of 0.83. Heterogeneity was substantial (I²>90%) for sensitivity and specificity. In a diuretic-only subgroup (six studies) specificity rose to 0.87 and heterogeneity declined (I²=56%). Overall certainty of evidence was low owing to inconsistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FEUN is a biomarker with moderate diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients. Its application could enhance AKI management; however, the high heterogeneity observed in our study highlights the need for further research to evaluate its utility across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024496083.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e100875"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110009
Malene Risager Lykke, Henrik T Toft Sørensen, Joy Lawn, Erzsebet Horvath-Puho
Objective: Long-term healthcare utilisation (HCU) among mothers of infants with neonatal, invasive group B Streptococcus disease (iGBS) remains understudied; identifying these patterns could provide better support for affected families and address the iGBS public health burden.
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: Population of Denmark.
Participants: 1565 mothers of infants with iGBS and 44 976 matched comparators from 1997 through 2021, with follow-up until 2022, using national health and social registry data.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: HCU including primary, inpatient, outpatient, psychiatric and surgical care was evaluated as period prevalence ratio (PPR) and rate ratios compared across three time periods (0-6 years, 7-13 years and 14-20 years) using a modified Poisson regression model and negative binomial regression with 95% CIs.
Results: Mothers of newborns with iGBS had higher PPRs of psychiatric care contacts in the first 0-6 years and 14-20 years following iGBS compared with the comparison cohort (RR0-61.12 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.35), RR14-201.24 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.58)). Exposed mothers had similar PPRs of primary, inpatient and outpatient care use as comparators, except for a slightly higher inpatient care use 7-13 years following iGBS. Exposed mothers had higher RRs for primary, inpatient, outpatient and psychiatric care contacts than mothers in the comparison cohort.
Conclusion: Mothers of iGBS-exposed infants had elevated psychiatric healthcare use and increased primary, and outpatient care visits compared with matched comparators, suggesting heightened healthcare needs and psychosocial burden of caregiving up to 20 years post-iGBS.
目的:新生儿侵袭性B族链球菌病(iGBS)患儿母亲的长期医疗保健利用(HCU)仍未得到充分研究;确定这些模式可以为受影响家庭提供更好的支持,并解决iGBS的公共卫生负担。设计:队列研究。背景:丹麦人口。参与者:从1997年到2021年,1565名患有iGBS婴儿的母亲和44976名匹配的比较者,随访至2022年,使用国家健康和社会登记数据。主要和次要结局指标:HCU包括初级、住院、门诊、精神科和外科护理,采用修正泊松回归模型和95% ci的负二项回归,以期患病率(PPR)和三个时间段(0-6年、7-13年和14-20年)的比率进行评估。结果:与对照队列相比,患有iGBS新生儿的母亲在iGBS后的前0-6年和14-20年有更高的精神科护理接触ppr (RR0-61.12 (95% CI 0.93至1.35),RR14-201.24 (95% CI 0.97至1.58))。除了iGBS后7-13年的住院治疗使用略高外,暴露母亲在初级、住院和门诊治疗使用方面的ppr与对照者相似。暴露的母亲在初级、住院、门诊和精神护理接触方面的rr高于对照队列中的母亲。结论:与匹配的比较组相比,暴露于igbs的婴儿的母亲有更高的精神保健使用和更多的初级和门诊就诊,表明igbs后20年的医疗保健需求和护理心理社会负担增加。
{"title":"Healthcare utilisation among mothers of newborns with invasive group B <i>Streptococcus</i> disease: a 20-year national cohort study.","authors":"Malene Risager Lykke, Henrik T Toft Sørensen, Joy Lawn, Erzsebet Horvath-Puho","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Long-term healthcare utilisation (HCU) among mothers of infants with neonatal, invasive group B <i>Streptococcus</i> disease (iGBS) remains understudied; identifying these patterns could provide better support for affected families and address the iGBS public health burden.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Population of Denmark.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1565 mothers of infants with iGBS and 44 976 matched comparators from 1997 through 2021, with follow-up until 2022, using national health and social registry data.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>HCU including primary, inpatient, outpatient, psychiatric and surgical care was evaluated as period prevalence ratio (PPR) and rate ratios compared across three time periods (0-6 years, 7-13 years and 14-20 years) using a modified Poisson regression model and negative binomial regression with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mothers of newborns with iGBS had higher PPRs of psychiatric care contacts in the first 0-6 years and 14-20 years following iGBS compared with the comparison cohort (RR<sub>0-6</sub>1.12 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.35), RR<sub>14-20</sub>1.24 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.58)). Exposed mothers had similar PPRs of primary, inpatient and outpatient care use as comparators, except for a slightly higher inpatient care use 7-13 years following iGBS. Exposed mothers had higher RRs for primary, inpatient, outpatient and psychiatric care contacts than mothers in the comparison cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mothers of iGBS-exposed infants had elevated psychiatric healthcare use and increased primary, and outpatient care visits compared with matched comparators, suggesting heightened healthcare needs and psychosocial burden of caregiving up to 20 years post-iGBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"16 1","pages":"e110009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}