Dynamin superfamily proteins (DSPs) are large GTPases that play crucial roles in membrane remodeling processes, including vesicle uptake, mitochondrial fission, and opposing fusion events. Among them, dynamin and dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) share a conserved domain architecture, yet exhibit unique structural and regulatory features that tailor their functions. This review explores the conformational rearrangements of the mammalian fission DSPs, dynamin and Drp1, focusing on their dimeric and tetrameric structures, lipid-bound assemblies, and key regulatory elements that drive membrane constriction. Structural biology methods, including x-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, have provided insight into the mechanism of activation and constriction of these DSPs, revealing how domain interactions and intrinsically disordered regions regulate self-assembly and enzymatic activity. We briefly examine the role of sequence modifications and partner proteins in modulating DSP function, highlighting the impact of regulatory factors on their respective cellular functions. An ongoing goal is to better understand the molecular mechanisms governing the transitions from a pre-assembled cytosolic state to a self-assembled state for dynamin and Drp1 on membranes, which provides a foundation for studying subsequent helical constriction. This insight will enhance our knowledge of organelle dynamics and provide new avenues for therapeutic interventions targeting DSP-related pathologies.
动力蛋白超家族蛋白(DSPs)是一种大型gtpase,在膜重塑过程中起关键作用,包括囊泡摄取、线粒体分裂和相反的融合事件。其中,动力蛋白(dynamin)和动力蛋白相关蛋白1 (dynamin-related protein 1, Drp1)共享一个保守的结构域结构,但却表现出独特的结构和调控特征,从而定制了它们的功能。本文综述了哺乳动物裂变dsp、dynamin和Drp1的构象重排,重点研究了它们的二聚体和四聚体结构、脂质结合组装和驱动膜收缩的关键调控元件。结构生物学方法,包括x射线晶体学和低温电子显微镜,提供了对这些dsp的激活和收缩机制的深入了解,揭示了结构域相互作用和内在无序区域如何调节自组装和酶活性。我们简要地研究了序列修饰和伴侣蛋白在调节DSP功能中的作用,强调了调节因子对其各自细胞功能的影响。一个持续的目标是更好地理解控制细胞膜上动力蛋白和Drp1从预组装的细胞质状态转变为自组装状态的分子机制,这为研究随后的螺旋收缩提供了基础。这一见解将增强我们对细胞器动力学的认识,并为针对dsp相关病理的治疗干预提供新的途径。
{"title":"Conformational Rearrangement of Fission DSPs","authors":"Anelise N. Hutson, Kristy Rochon, Jason A. Mears","doi":"10.1002/bies.70062","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bies.70062","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dynamin superfamily proteins (DSPs) are large GTPases that play crucial roles in membrane remodeling processes, including vesicle uptake, mitochondrial fission, and opposing fusion events. Among them, dynamin and dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) share a conserved domain architecture, yet exhibit unique structural and regulatory features that tailor their functions. This review explores the conformational rearrangements of the mammalian fission DSPs, dynamin and Drp1, focusing on their dimeric and tetrameric structures, lipid-bound assemblies, and key regulatory elements that drive membrane constriction. Structural biology methods, including x-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, have provided insight into the mechanism of activation and constriction of these DSPs, revealing how domain interactions and intrinsically disordered regions regulate self-assembly and enzymatic activity. We briefly examine the role of sequence modifications and partner proteins in modulating DSP function, highlighting the impact of regulatory factors on their respective cellular functions. An ongoing goal is to better understand the molecular mechanisms governing the transitions from a pre-assembled cytosolic state to a self-assembled state for dynamin and Drp1 on membranes, which provides a foundation for studying subsequent helical constriction. This insight will enhance our knowledge of organelle dynamics and provide new avenues for therapeutic interventions targeting DSP-related pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":"47 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bies.70062","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144943697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Primary cilia are customized subcellular signaling compartments leveraged to detect signals in diverse physiological contexts. Although prevalent throughout mammalian tissues, primary cilia are not universal. Many non-ciliated cells derive from developmental lineages that include ciliated progenitors; however, little is known about how primary cilia are lost as cells differentiate. Here, we examine how ciliated and non-ciliated states emerge during development and are actively maintained. We highlight several pathways for primary cilia loss, including cilia resorption in pre-mitotic cells, cilia deconstruction in post-mitotic cells, cilia shortening via remodeling, and cilia disassembly preceding multiciliogenesis. Lack of ciliogenesis is known to decrease primary cilia frequency and cause ciliopathies. Failure to maintain cilia can also cause primary cilia to be absent. Conversely, defects in primary cilia suppression or disassembly can lead to the presence of primary cilia in non-ciliated cells. We examine how changes in ciliation states could contribute to tumorigenesis and neurodegeneration.
{"title":"Taking Down the Primary Cilium: Pathways for Disassembly in Differentiating Cells","authors":"Carolyn M. Ott, Saikat Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1002/bies.70060","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bies.70060","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Primary cilia are customized subcellular signaling compartments leveraged to detect signals in diverse physiological contexts. Although prevalent throughout mammalian tissues, primary cilia are not universal. Many non-ciliated cells derive from developmental lineages that include ciliated progenitors; however, little is known about how primary cilia are lost as cells differentiate. Here, we examine how ciliated and non-ciliated states emerge during development and are actively maintained. We highlight several pathways for primary cilia loss, including cilia resorption in pre-mitotic cells, cilia deconstruction in post-mitotic cells, cilia shortening via remodeling, and cilia disassembly preceding multiciliogenesis. Lack of ciliogenesis is known to decrease primary cilia frequency and cause ciliopathies. Failure to maintain cilia can also cause primary cilia to be absent. Conversely, defects in primary cilia suppression or disassembly can lead to the presence of primary cilia in non-ciliated cells. We examine how changes in ciliation states could contribute to tumorigenesis and neurodegeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":"47 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516293/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144943726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mitosis is a crucial phase of the cell cycle, during which several mechanisms work together to ensure accurate chromosome segregation and to eliminate defective cells if errors occur. One key mechanism is the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which upon mitotic errors—such as those induced by genetic mutations, drug treatments, or environmental stresses—arrest cells in mitosis. Arrested cells may undergo apoptosis during mitosis or eventually exit mitosis even if the damage remains unrepaired. Mitotic exit is driven by a reduction in cyclin B1 levels, regulated during mitosis by multiple mechanisms affecting both its synthesis and degradation. Strikingly, cells harboring the tumor suppressor p53 can monitor the duration of mitosis and encode this information as a form of “mitotic memory”. This memory influences the fate of daughter cells after mitotic exit by inducing G1 arrest through p53-dependent expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21. Recent studies have proposed mechanisms by which cyclin B1 levels are regulated during mitotic arrest and how p53 promotes mitotic-arrest-dependent transcription of p21 in G1. These findings indicate that both the expression of regulators that control mitotic duration and the activity of proteins that monitor the duration of mitosis and halt proliferation work together to determine cell fate following mitotic errors. Understanding these mechanisms offers valuable insights for cancer therapy, particularly regarding the strategic application of antimitotic agents.
{"title":"When the Clock Is Ticking: The Role of Mitotic Duration in Cell Fate Determination","authors":"Cornelia Sala, Elmar Schiebel","doi":"10.1002/bies.70061","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bies.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mitosis is a crucial phase of the cell cycle, during which several mechanisms work together to ensure accurate chromosome segregation and to eliminate defective cells if errors occur. One key mechanism is the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which upon mitotic errors—such as those induced by genetic mutations, drug treatments, or environmental stresses—arrest cells in mitosis. Arrested cells may undergo apoptosis during mitosis or eventually exit mitosis even if the damage remains unrepaired. Mitotic exit is driven by a reduction in cyclin B1 levels, regulated during mitosis by multiple mechanisms affecting both its synthesis and degradation. Strikingly, cells harboring the tumor suppressor p53 can monitor the duration of mitosis and encode this information as a form of “mitotic memory”. This memory influences the fate of daughter cells after mitotic exit by inducing G1 arrest through p53-dependent expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21. Recent studies have proposed mechanisms by which cyclin B1 levels are regulated during mitotic arrest and how p53 promotes mitotic-arrest-dependent transcription of p21 in G1. These findings indicate that both the expression of regulators that control mitotic duration and the activity of proteins that monitor the duration of mitosis and halt proliferation work together to determine cell fate following mitotic errors. Understanding these mechanisms offers valuable insights for cancer therapy, particularly regarding the strategic application of antimitotic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":"47 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bies.70061","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144943707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In article 70044 Lana Kostic and Nick Barker review the evolving understanding of stem cell dynamics in the esophagus, with a focus on their roles in tissue homeostasis and cancer development. Challenging earlier models that proposed a uniform basal progenitor layer, recent findings suggest a heterogeneous pool of stem and progenitor cells with distinct phenotypic and functional traits. This cellular diversity may influence individual susceptibility to esophageal cancer, which can arise from random mutations or cancer stem cell activity. The authors highlight how advances in single-cell technologies and organoid models are reshaping perspectives on esophageal biology and offer promising avenues for therapeutic innovation. By re-evaluating stem cell identity and behavior, the article underscores the complexity of epithelial maintenance and the multifactorial nature of cancer initiation in the esophagus.