Organismal death has long been considered the irreversible ending of an organism's integrated functioning as a whole. However, the persistence of functionality in organs, tissues, and cells postmortem, as seen in organ donation, raises questions about the mechanisms underlying this resilience. Recent research reveals that various factors, such as environmental conditions, metabolic activity, and inherent survival mechanisms, influence postmortem cellular functionality and transformation. These findings challenge our understanding of life and death, highlighting the potential for certain cells to grow and form new multicellular entities. This opens new avenues in biology and medicine, expanding our comprehension of life's complexity.
{"title":"Perspective on Death: A Gateway to a New Biology.","authors":"Peter A Noble, Alexander Pozhitkov","doi":"10.1002/bies.202400158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organismal death has long been considered the irreversible ending of an organism's integrated functioning as a whole. However, the persistence of functionality in organs, tissues, and cells postmortem, as seen in organ donation, raises questions about the mechanisms underlying this resilience. Recent research reveals that various factors, such as environmental conditions, metabolic activity, and inherent survival mechanisms, influence postmortem cellular functionality and transformation. These findings challenge our understanding of life and death, highlighting the potential for certain cells to grow and form new multicellular entities. This opens new avenues in biology and medicine, expanding our comprehension of life's complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":" ","pages":"e202400158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142833900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daily rhythms in the rate and specificity of protein synthesis occur in most mammalian cells through an interaction between cell-autonomous circadian regulation and daily cycles of systemic cues. However, the overall protein content of a typical cell changes little over 24 h. For most proteins, translation appears to be coordinated with protein degradation, producing phases of proteomic renewal that maximize energy efficiency while broadly maintaining proteostasis across the solar cycle. We propose that a major function of this temporal compartmentalization-and of circadian rhythmicity in general-is to optimize the energy efficiency of protein synthesis and associated processes such as complex assembly. We further propose that much of this temporal compartmentalization is achieved at the level of translational initiation, such that the translational machinery alternates between distinct translational mechanisms, each using a distinct toolkit of phosphoproteins to preferentially recognize and translate different classes of mRNA.
{"title":"Circadian Control of Protein Synthesis.","authors":"Nathan R James, John S O'Neill","doi":"10.1002/bies.202300158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202300158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily rhythms in the rate and specificity of protein synthesis occur in most mammalian cells through an interaction between cell-autonomous circadian regulation and daily cycles of systemic cues. However, the overall protein content of a typical cell changes little over 24 h. For most proteins, translation appears to be coordinated with protein degradation, producing phases of proteomic renewal that maximize energy efficiency while broadly maintaining proteostasis across the solar cycle. We propose that a major function of this temporal compartmentalization-and of circadian rhythmicity in general-is to optimize the energy efficiency of protein synthesis and associated processes such as complex assembly. We further propose that much of this temporal compartmentalization is achieved at the level of translational initiation, such that the translational machinery alternates between distinct translational mechanisms, each using a distinct toolkit of phosphoproteins to preferentially recognize and translate different classes of mRNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":" ","pages":"e202300158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142817388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Several recently discovered small proteins of less than 100 amino acids control important, but sometimes surprising, steps in the metabolism of cyanobacteria. There is mounting evidence that a large number of small protein genes have also been overlooked in the genome annotation of many other microorganisms. Although too short for enzymatic activity, their functional characterization has frequently revealed the involvement in processes such as signaling and sensing, interspecies communication, stress responses, metabolism, regulation of transcription and translation, and in the formation of multisubunit protein complexes. Cyanobacteria are the only prokaryotes that perform oxygenic photosynthesis. They thrive under a wide variety of conditions as long as there is light and must cope with dynamic changes in the environment. To acclimate to these fluctuations, frequently small regulatory proteins become expressed that target key enzymes and metabolic processes. The consequences of their actions are profound and can even impact the surrounding microbiome. This review highlights the diverse functions of recently discovered small proteins that control cyanobacterial metabolism. It also addresses why many of these proteins have been overlooked so far and explores the potential for implementing metabolic engineering strategies to improve the use of cyanobacteria in biotechnological applications.
{"title":"How Small Proteins Adjust the Metabolism of Cyanobacteria Under Stress: The Role of Small Proteins in Cyanobacterial Stress Responses.","authors":"Alexander Kraus, Wolfgang R Hess","doi":"10.1002/bies.202400245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several recently discovered small proteins of less than 100 amino acids control important, but sometimes surprising, steps in the metabolism of cyanobacteria. There is mounting evidence that a large number of small protein genes have also been overlooked in the genome annotation of many other microorganisms. Although too short for enzymatic activity, their functional characterization has frequently revealed the involvement in processes such as signaling and sensing, interspecies communication, stress responses, metabolism, regulation of transcription and translation, and in the formation of multisubunit protein complexes. Cyanobacteria are the only prokaryotes that perform oxygenic photosynthesis. They thrive under a wide variety of conditions as long as there is light and must cope with dynamic changes in the environment. To acclimate to these fluctuations, frequently small regulatory proteins become expressed that target key enzymes and metabolic processes. The consequences of their actions are profound and can even impact the surrounding microbiome. This review highlights the diverse functions of recently discovered small proteins that control cyanobacterial metabolism. It also addresses why many of these proteins have been overlooked so far and explores the potential for implementing metabolic engineering strategies to improve the use of cyanobacteria in biotechnological applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":" ","pages":"e202400245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142817312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is a specialized epithelium at the back of the eye that carries out a variety of functions essential for visual health. Recent studies have advanced our molecular understanding of one of the major functions of the RPE; phagocytosis of spent photoreceptor outer segments (POS). Notably, a mechanical link, formed between apical integrins bound to extracellular POS and the intracellular actomyosin cytoskeleton, is proposed to drive the internalization of POS. The process may involve a “nibbling” action, as an initial step, to sever outer segment tips. These insights have led us to hypothesize an “integrin adhesome-like” network, atypically assembled at apical membrane RPE-POS contacts. I propose that this hypothetical network orchestrates the complex membrane remodeling events required for particle internalization. Therefore, its analysis and characterization will likely lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms that control POS phagocytosis.
{"title":"Phagocytosis by the retinal pigment epithelium: New insights into polarized cell mechanics","authors":"Ceniz Zihni","doi":"10.1002/bies.202300197","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bies.202300197","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is a specialized epithelium at the back of the eye that carries out a variety of functions essential for visual health. Recent studies have advanced our molecular understanding of one of the major functions of the RPE; phagocytosis of spent photoreceptor outer segments (POS). Notably, a mechanical link, formed between apical integrins bound to extracellular POS and the intracellular actomyosin cytoskeleton, is proposed to drive the internalization of POS. The process may involve a “nibbling” action, as an initial step, to sever outer segment tips. These insights have led us to hypothesize an “integrin adhesome-like” network, atypically assembled at apical membrane RPE-POS contacts. I propose that this hypothetical network orchestrates the complex membrane remodeling events required for particle internalization. Therefore, its analysis and characterization will likely lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms that control POS phagocytosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bies.202300197","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142812187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decoding Angiocrine Signaling: Endothelial Cells as Drivers of Organ Regeneration and Homeostasis.","authors":"Riikka Kivelä","doi":"10.1002/bies.202400278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400278","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":" ","pages":"e202400278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In cancer research, the term epigenetics was used in the 1970s in its modern sense encompassing non-genetic events modifying the chromatin state, mainly to oppose the emerging oncogene paradigm. However, starting from the establishment of this prominent concept, the importance of these epigenetic phenomena in cancer rarely led to questioning the causal role of genetic alterations. Only in the last 10 years, the accumulation of problematic data, better experimental technologies, and some ambitious models pushed the idea that epigenetics could be at least as important as genetics in early oncogenesis. Until this year, a direct demonstration of epigenetic oncogenesis was still lacking. Now, Parreno, Cavalli and colleagues, using a refined experimental model in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, enforced the initiation of tumors solely by imposing a transient loss of Polycomb repression, leading to a purely epigenetic oncogenesis phenomenon. Despite a few caveats that we discuss, this pioneering work represents a major breakpoint in cancer research. We are led to consider the theoretical and conceptual implications on oncogenesis and to search for links between this artificial experimental model and naturally occurring processes, while revisiting cancer theories that were previously proposed as alternatives to the oncogene-centered paradigm.
{"title":"Evidence of Epigenetic Oncogenesis: A Turning Point in Cancer Research.","authors":"Jean-Pascal Capp, Benoît Aliaga, Vera Pancaldi","doi":"10.1002/bies.202400183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In cancer research, the term epigenetics was used in the 1970s in its modern sense encompassing non-genetic events modifying the chromatin state, mainly to oppose the emerging oncogene paradigm. However, starting from the establishment of this prominent concept, the importance of these epigenetic phenomena in cancer rarely led to questioning the causal role of genetic alterations. Only in the last 10 years, the accumulation of problematic data, better experimental technologies, and some ambitious models pushed the idea that epigenetics could be at least as important as genetics in early oncogenesis. Until this year, a direct demonstration of epigenetic oncogenesis was still lacking. Now, Parreno, Cavalli and colleagues, using a refined experimental model in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, enforced the initiation of tumors solely by imposing a transient loss of Polycomb repression, leading to a purely epigenetic oncogenesis phenomenon. Despite a few caveats that we discuss, this pioneering work represents a major breakpoint in cancer research. We are led to consider the theoretical and conceptual implications on oncogenesis and to search for links between this artificial experimental model and naturally occurring processes, while revisiting cancer theories that were previously proposed as alternatives to the oncogene-centered paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":" ","pages":"e202400183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vitalii Zablotskii, Tatyana Polyakova, Alexandr Dejneka
We explore the potential of using magnetic cues as a novel approach to modulating ion channel expression, which could provide an alternative to traditional pharmacological interventions. Ion channels are crucial targets for pharmacological therapies, and ongoing research in this field continues to introduce new methods for treating various diseases. However, the efficacy of ion channel drugs is often compromised by issues such as target selectivity, leading to side effects, toxicity, and complex drug interactions. These challenges, along with problems like drug resistance and difficulties in crossing biological barriers, highlight the need for innovative strategies. In this context, the proposed use of magnetic cues to modulate ion channel expression may offer a promising solution to address these limitations, potentially improving the safety and effectiveness of treatments, particularly for long-term use. Key developments in this area are reviewed, the relationships between changes in ion channel expression and magnetic fields are summarized, knowledge gaps are identified, and central issues relevant to future research are discussed.
{"title":"Exploring Ion Channel Magnetic Pharmacology: Are Magnetic Cues a Viable Alternative to Ion Channel Drugs?","authors":"Vitalii Zablotskii, Tatyana Polyakova, Alexandr Dejneka","doi":"10.1002/bies.202400200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We explore the potential of using magnetic cues as a novel approach to modulating ion channel expression, which could provide an alternative to traditional pharmacological interventions. Ion channels are crucial targets for pharmacological therapies, and ongoing research in this field continues to introduce new methods for treating various diseases. However, the efficacy of ion channel drugs is often compromised by issues such as target selectivity, leading to side effects, toxicity, and complex drug interactions. These challenges, along with problems like drug resistance and difficulties in crossing biological barriers, highlight the need for innovative strategies. In this context, the proposed use of magnetic cues to modulate ion channel expression may offer a promising solution to address these limitations, potentially improving the safety and effectiveness of treatments, particularly for long-term use. Key developments in this area are reviewed, the relationships between changes in ion channel expression and magnetic fields are summarized, knowledge gaps are identified, and central issues relevant to future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":" ","pages":"e202400200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The dominant paradigm in biomedicine focuses on genetically-specified components of cells and their biochemical dynamics, emphasizing bottom-up emergence of complexity. Here, I explore the biomedical implications of a complementary emerging field: diverse intelligence. Using tools from behavioral science and multiscale neuroscience, we can study development, regenerative repair, and cancer suppression as behaviors of a collective intelligence of cells navigating the spaces of possible morphologies and transcriptional and physiological states. A focus on the competencies of living material-from molecular to organismal scales-reveals a new landscape for interventions. Such top-down approaches take advantage of the memories and homeodynamic goal-seeking behavior of cells and tissues, offering the same massive advantages in biomedicine and bioengineering that reprogrammable hardware has provided information technologies. The bioelectric networks that bind individual cells toward large-scale anatomical goals are an especially tractable interface to organ-level plasticity, and tools to modulate them already exist. This suggests a research program to understand and tame the software of life for therapeutic gain by understanding the many examples of basal cognition that operate throughout living bodies.
{"title":"The Multiscale Wisdom of the Body: Collective Intelligence as a Tractable Interface for Next-Generation Biomedicine.","authors":"Michael Levin","doi":"10.1002/bies.202400196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dominant paradigm in biomedicine focuses on genetically-specified components of cells and their biochemical dynamics, emphasizing bottom-up emergence of complexity. Here, I explore the biomedical implications of a complementary emerging field: diverse intelligence. Using tools from behavioral science and multiscale neuroscience, we can study development, regenerative repair, and cancer suppression as behaviors of a collective intelligence of cells navigating the spaces of possible morphologies and transcriptional and physiological states. A focus on the competencies of living material-from molecular to organismal scales-reveals a new landscape for interventions. Such top-down approaches take advantage of the memories and homeodynamic goal-seeking behavior of cells and tissues, offering the same massive advantages in biomedicine and bioengineering that reprogrammable hardware has provided information technologies. The bioelectric networks that bind individual cells toward large-scale anatomical goals are an especially tractable interface to organ-level plasticity, and tools to modulate them already exist. This suggests a research program to understand and tame the software of life for therapeutic gain by understanding the many examples of basal cognition that operate throughout living bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":" ","pages":"e202400196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142766445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>We are now on the cusp of realizing the promise of Pluripotent Stem Cells (PSCs) as powerful tools for exploring disease mechanisms, facilitating the discovery of new drugs and replacing diseased or damaged tissues, just 26 years since Jamie Thomson first described the long-term culture of human embryonic stem (ES) cells,<sup>[</sup><span><sup>1</sup></span><sup>]</sup> and 18 years since Shinya Yamanaka discovered how to reprogram somatic cells to produce induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells with a state equivalent to that of ES cells.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>2</sup></span><sup>]</sup> But this field has a much longer experimental history, stretching back to 1954 when Leroy Stevens first described the propensity of male laboratory mice of the 129 inbred strain to develop testicular teratomas.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>3</sup></span><sup>]</sup> In many ways, the PSC field provides a striking example of how science develops through a labyrinth of pathways–some successful, some not so successful, sometimes leading in unexpected directions and arriving in places far removed from those originally envisaged.</p><p>So much of modern life depends on technology that we often take for granted and, consequently, we pay little attention to how the underlying science developed–who did it, and why? A case in point is our recent experience of the Covid pandemic. As that fades in our collective memory, we forget how remarkable it was that within a year of the first cases being identified in China, the virus had been isolated, its genome sequenced, rapid assays based upon PCR developed and innovative vaccines produced. However, the knowledge that made possible that rapid response to Covid came from diverse research stretching back over the past century or more–the identification of DNA and later RNA as carriers of genetic information, the deciphering of the genetic code, and recognition of its universality to all living organisms, the understanding of the mechanisms that protect some bacteria from infection with some viruses, leading to the discovery of restriction enzymes used as tools for DNA sequencing, or the discovery of heat stable Taq polymerase in bacteria growing in hot volcanic springs that allowed the development of PCR. Yet none of this research was remotely driven by thoughts of solving the problems of a novel viral pandemic. It was mostly impelled by the curiosity of individual scientists, with funding often provided through peer-reviewed grants focused on increasing basic knowledge, not trying to solve specific practical problems. It was also supported by teamwork and widespread open communication between the different research groups involved, many in different countries, an atmosphere well captured by Horace Judson in his book, “<i>The Eighth Day of Creation</i>,” about the development of molecular biology.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>4</sup></span><sup>]</sup> Yet it often seems that we are in danger of ignoring these lessons as governments, funding ag
在第一篇文章中,Ginny Papaioannou 回顾了胚胎癌(EC)细胞--与畸胎瘤相关的癌症干细胞--与胚泡阶段早期胚胎的多能细胞非常相似的事实,讨论了她和其他人如何通过将EC细胞转移到小鼠胚泡中并让其发育至足月(https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400061)来证明这种关系。这为马丁-埃文斯和盖尔-马丁从小鼠胚泡中提取 ES 细胞提供了证据。[8, 9]大约在同一时期,弗朗索瓦-雅各布(François Jacob)是研究多能性欧共体细胞系的重要小组之一,他在巴黎巴斯德研究所决定从发现基因调控基本原理的细菌遗传学转向研究哺乳动物发育的基因控制。[10] 在接下来的文章中,鲍勃-埃里克森(Bob Erickson)讨论了巴斯德研究小组是如何被当时盛行的关于实验鼠 T-焦点的观点所吸引的,这种观点认为 T-焦点包括一组主基因,这些主基因编码一系列细胞表面抗原,这些抗原反过来又控制着早期胚胎发育 (https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400021) 。).不幸的是,这被证明是一个盲点,说明了当成熟的研究人员进入新的不熟悉领域时,以及将技术扩展到超出当时可用技术能力所固有的危险,在这种情况下,在单克隆抗体出现之前的血清学。在下一篇文章中,我将介绍从弗朗索瓦-雅各布小组转到费城威斯塔研究所的芭芭拉-诺尔斯和达沃-索尔特小组后,我们如何利用巴斯德小组无法获得的单克隆抗体技术,确定新的细胞表面标志物,从而使我们能够描述多能人类EC细胞的特征,并证明它们与小鼠EC细胞的不同之处。马丁-埃文斯(Martin Evans)、马里奥-卡佩基(Mario Capecchi)和奥利弗-史密斯(Oliver Smithies)因此获得了诺贝尔奖。然而,特性良好的人类EC细胞系的存在激发了人类ES细胞也可能有助于了解人类胚胎学的想法。在接下来的文章中,马丁-佩拉(Martin Pera)将讨论人类ES细胞系的产生之路,以及这些细胞系不仅可用于人类胚胎学,还可用于开发人类医疗保健的新方法,包括再生医学的想法(https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400092)。小鼠ES细胞和后来的人类ES细胞的最初衍生都依赖于使用有丝分裂失活的成纤维细胞饲养细胞和包括胎牛血清在内的复杂培养基。在这些未确定的条件下,我们无法破译维持这些细胞自我更新能力的分子机制,即它们在无限增殖的同时保持多能性的能力,也无法理解为什么ES细胞可以很容易地从一些小鼠品系的胚胎中衍生出来,而其他品系的胚胎却不行,某些物种如大鼠的胚胎也不行。在下一篇文章中,应启龙和珍妮-尼科尔斯讨论了ES细胞与早期胚胎的关系以及控制分化的信号通路,从而为小鼠ES细胞开发出了定义培养基(https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400077)。除其他后果外,这还促进了从许多品系的小鼠和大鼠中提取 ES 细胞。奥斯汀-史密斯(Austin Smith)在他的文章中继续探讨了这一主题,讨论了调控多能性的遗传机制和多能性状态在早期发育过程中的变化如何有助于解释为什么这种状态在胚胎中是短暂的,但在体外却能无限期地维持,以及为什么从小鼠和人类胚胎中提取的 ES 细胞之间存在着巨大差异 (https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400108)。在杰米-汤姆森(Jamie Thomson)衍生出 ES 细胞和山中伸弥(Shinya Yamanaka)发现将体细胞重编程为 iPS 细胞的方法后,应用这些细胞解决人类健康相关问题的机会变得显而易见,但潜在的问题也随之而来。Christine Mummery在她的文章中讨论了她的职业生涯是如何从早期的小鼠ES细胞研究发展到开发使用人类造血干细胞生成心肌细胞的工具,这些心肌细胞反过来又可用于探索不同药物在一系列病理条件下与心肌细胞的相互作用(https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400078)。
{"title":"From cancer to pluripotent stem cells–A long and winding road","authors":"Peter W. Andrews","doi":"10.1002/bies.202400192","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bies.202400192","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We are now on the cusp of realizing the promise of Pluripotent Stem Cells (PSCs) as powerful tools for exploring disease mechanisms, facilitating the discovery of new drugs and replacing diseased or damaged tissues, just 26 years since Jamie Thomson first described the long-term culture of human embryonic stem (ES) cells,<sup>[</sup><span><sup>1</sup></span><sup>]</sup> and 18 years since Shinya Yamanaka discovered how to reprogram somatic cells to produce induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells with a state equivalent to that of ES cells.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>2</sup></span><sup>]</sup> But this field has a much longer experimental history, stretching back to 1954 when Leroy Stevens first described the propensity of male laboratory mice of the 129 inbred strain to develop testicular teratomas.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>3</sup></span><sup>]</sup> In many ways, the PSC field provides a striking example of how science develops through a labyrinth of pathways–some successful, some not so successful, sometimes leading in unexpected directions and arriving in places far removed from those originally envisaged.</p><p>So much of modern life depends on technology that we often take for granted and, consequently, we pay little attention to how the underlying science developed–who did it, and why? A case in point is our recent experience of the Covid pandemic. As that fades in our collective memory, we forget how remarkable it was that within a year of the first cases being identified in China, the virus had been isolated, its genome sequenced, rapid assays based upon PCR developed and innovative vaccines produced. However, the knowledge that made possible that rapid response to Covid came from diverse research stretching back over the past century or more–the identification of DNA and later RNA as carriers of genetic information, the deciphering of the genetic code, and recognition of its universality to all living organisms, the understanding of the mechanisms that protect some bacteria from infection with some viruses, leading to the discovery of restriction enzymes used as tools for DNA sequencing, or the discovery of heat stable Taq polymerase in bacteria growing in hot volcanic springs that allowed the development of PCR. Yet none of this research was remotely driven by thoughts of solving the problems of a novel viral pandemic. It was mostly impelled by the curiosity of individual scientists, with funding often provided through peer-reviewed grants focused on increasing basic knowledge, not trying to solve specific practical problems. It was also supported by teamwork and widespread open communication between the different research groups involved, many in different countries, an atmosphere well captured by Horace Judson in his book, “<i>The Eighth Day of Creation</i>,” about the development of molecular biology.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>4</sup></span><sup>]</sup> Yet it often seems that we are in danger of ignoring these lessons as governments, funding ag","PeriodicalId":9264,"journal":{"name":"BioEssays","volume":"46 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bies.202400192","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142715437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Human pluripotent stem cells can differentiate to all cells of the body, including those of the heart. The heart contains multiple cell types but the contractile cells are called cardiomyocytes. In article 2400078, Christine Mummery describes her serendipitous finding on how to induce differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes by co-culture with visceral endoderm. This was later reproduced in human induced pluripotent stem cells using growth factors. The contractile apparatus of cardiomyocytes, which consists of structures called sarcomeres, is clearly evident in these cells after antibody staining. hiPSC can be derived from patients with different cardiac diseases. Cardiomyocytes from these hiPSC often capture patient phenotypes. This has led both to new insights into mechanisms underlying genetic cardiac diseases, like myopathies or arrhythmias, and created opportunities for discovering new drugs to treat these conditions and to assess their cardiac safety, without using animal models.
The image shows immunofluorescent staining of sarcomeres, the contractile units of the human heart, in cardiomycytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Staining is for cardiac Troponin T (green) and α-sarcomeric actinin (red). Nuclei are stained blue with Hoechst. Credit to Viviana Meraviglia.