Pub Date : 2022-06-13DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321251
S. Nagueh
Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is currently treated with septal reduction therapy in severely symptomatic patients who are not responsive to medical treatment. Since its introduction by Dr Ulrich Sigwart in 1995, alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been increasingly performed across the globe. In fact, after discussion of risks, benefits and alternatives, many patients elect to undergo ASA. There have been several attempts to identify ASA outcome predictors in this patient population and there are concerns about worse outcomes in female patients. This important question is tackled in this issue of the journal by Lawin et al. The authors report on procedural outcomes at 1–4 days and at 6 months after ASA in 1367 patients with HOCM, stratified by sex. In comparison with men, women were older but had similar prevalence of coronary artery disease. Overall, symptomatic status was worse in women with more frequent syncope, and more severe dyspnoea and angina. Despite these differences, there were no apparent differences in medical therapy prior to ASA. Symptoms were corroborated by a significantly shorter 6minute walking distance (6MWD) in women prior to ASA. However, we are not told whether there was a difference in the doses of the drugs used or the combination of medications (eg, betablockers and disopyramide). Importantly, both resting gradients and exerciseinduced gradients (supine bicycle exercise to workload of 75 W for 5 min) were similar between men and women. While the basal septum was slightly thicker in men (on average for the study sample a difference of 1 mm), when indexed to body surface area (BSA), septum thickness was more in women (average difference: 0.7 mm/ m). This occurred because of the smaller BSA in women. Interestingly, despite the similar number of septal vessels occluded and volume of ethanol used in men and women, infarct size as assessed by peak creatine kinase was significantly higher in men. The magnitude of change at 6 months in basal septal thickness, rest and exerciseinduced gradients, and 6MWD was similar between men and women. Likewise, symptomatic improvement was comparable. Complications were similar, with the exception of highgrade atrioventricular (AV) block, the need for permanent pacemakers and vascular complications which occured more frequently in women, and pulmonary embolism which was more common in men. The study has the strengths of a large data set and coming from an experienced referral centre for ASA. It has several limitations acknowledged by the authors including followup being available in only 65% of women and 74% of men, the absence of baseline ECG findings and the short duration of followup. The absence of ECG findings is particularly relevant to understanding the reasons behind the higher incidence of advanced AV block in women. While the results of 6MWD at followup were included, data on exercise tolerance were not available. In general, the findings are similar to other studies
{"title":"Sex and outcomes after alcohol septal ablation for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy","authors":"S. Nagueh","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321251","url":null,"abstract":"Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is currently treated with septal reduction therapy in severely symptomatic patients who are not responsive to medical treatment. Since its introduction by Dr Ulrich Sigwart in 1995, alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been increasingly performed across the globe. In fact, after discussion of risks, benefits and alternatives, many patients elect to undergo ASA. There have been several attempts to identify ASA outcome predictors in this patient population and there are concerns about worse outcomes in female patients. This important question is tackled in this issue of the journal by Lawin et al. The authors report on procedural outcomes at 1–4 days and at 6 months after ASA in 1367 patients with HOCM, stratified by sex. In comparison with men, women were older but had similar prevalence of coronary artery disease. Overall, symptomatic status was worse in women with more frequent syncope, and more severe dyspnoea and angina. Despite these differences, there were no apparent differences in medical therapy prior to ASA. Symptoms were corroborated by a significantly shorter 6minute walking distance (6MWD) in women prior to ASA. However, we are not told whether there was a difference in the doses of the drugs used or the combination of medications (eg, betablockers and disopyramide). Importantly, both resting gradients and exerciseinduced gradients (supine bicycle exercise to workload of 75 W for 5 min) were similar between men and women. While the basal septum was slightly thicker in men (on average for the study sample a difference of 1 mm), when indexed to body surface area (BSA), septum thickness was more in women (average difference: 0.7 mm/ m). This occurred because of the smaller BSA in women. Interestingly, despite the similar number of septal vessels occluded and volume of ethanol used in men and women, infarct size as assessed by peak creatine kinase was significantly higher in men. The magnitude of change at 6 months in basal septal thickness, rest and exerciseinduced gradients, and 6MWD was similar between men and women. Likewise, symptomatic improvement was comparable. Complications were similar, with the exception of highgrade atrioventricular (AV) block, the need for permanent pacemakers and vascular complications which occured more frequently in women, and pulmonary embolism which was more common in men. The study has the strengths of a large data set and coming from an experienced referral centre for ASA. It has several limitations acknowledged by the authors including followup being available in only 65% of women and 74% of men, the absence of baseline ECG findings and the short duration of followup. The absence of ECG findings is particularly relevant to understanding the reasons behind the higher incidence of advanced AV block in women. While the results of 6MWD at followup were included, data on exercise tolerance were not available. In general, the findings are similar to other studies ","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1588 - 1589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44254332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-10DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321137
K. Kusunose
With rapidly ageing population, aortic stenosis (AS) has become one of the most common valvular heart diseases. Severe AS is clearly associated with increased mortality, and the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines designate a class I or IIa indication for aortic valve surgery in severe patients with AS with symptoms or with low left ventricular (LV) function. Historically, based on the lower risk of sudden death in moderate AS compared with severe AS, watchful observation was recommended to patients with moderate AS. In the last decade, prognostic findings on moderate AS have been gathered (table 1). A large echocardiographic national database study, including 3315 moderate AS with various LV systolic functions, suggested a poor survival rate (5year mortality: 56%). Recently, two academic institutional databases, including 1245 moderate AS, also showed poor prognosis during followup (median followup: 4.3 years; mortality: 45.3%). From a physiological viewpoint, narrowing of the aortic valve area leads to LV systolic/diastolic dysfunction due to LV pressure overloading. In patients with severe AS who particularly underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), diastolic dysfunction (DD) has been described as an early marker of myocardial damage and an important prognostic information. Thaden et al reported an association between echocardiographic data and outcomes from a retrospective singlecentre study. Over a mean followup period of 7.3 years, increased left atrial pressure based on the American Society of Echocardiography/ European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria remained an independent predictor of mortality after successful aortic valve replacement (AVR) (HR: 1.45; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.81). More recently, Ong et al clearly showed an association between DD grading at baseline and combined cardiovascular death/rehospitalisation at 1 year from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 2 and SAPIEN 3 registry analysed by core laboratories (n=1253). These previous studies described a consistent message of an increased risk of event with worsening grade and stage of DD in severe AS. What about the association of moderate AS with DD? In their Heart article, Stassen et al presented data from a large registry of patients with moderate AS and preserved LV systolic function from three academic institutions between October 2001 and December 2019. Moderate AS was defined as an aortic valve area of between 1.0 cm and 1.5 cm. Finally, 1247 patients with moderate AS were retrospectively included and divided into three groups (normal diastolic function, indeterminate diastolic function and DD) based on the guidelines. The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate the prevalence of DD and (2) to examine the prognostic implications of DD in moderate AS with preserved LV systolic function. The primary outcome was allcause mortality. The secondary outcome was a composite of allcause mortality
随着人口老龄化的加速,主动脉瓣狭窄已成为最常见的心脏瓣膜病之一。严重的AS明显与死亡率增加相关,目前美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南为有症状或左心室功能低下的严重AS患者的主动脉瓣手术指定了I级或IIa级适应症。历史上,鉴于中度AS患者猝死风险较重度AS患者低,建议对中度AS患者进行观察。在过去十年中,已经收集了中度AS的预后发现(表1)。一项大型超声心动图国家数据库研究,包括3315例具有各种左室收缩功能的中度AS,表明其生存率较低(5年死亡率:56%)。最近,包括1245名中度AS在内的两个学术机构数据库在随访期间也显示预后不良(中位随访:4.3年;死亡率:45.3%)。从生理学的角度来看,主动脉瓣面积变窄导致左室压力超载导致左室收缩/舒张功能障碍。重度AS患者特别是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者,舒张功能障碍(DD)被认为是心肌损伤的早期标志和重要的预后信息。Thaden等人报道了超声心动图数据与回顾性单中心研究结果之间的关联。在平均7.3年的随访期间,根据美国超声心动图学会/欧洲心血管成像协会的标准,左房压升高仍然是主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)成功后死亡率的独立预测因子(HR: 1.45;95% CI 1.16 - 1.81)。最近,Ong等人通过核心实验室(n=1253)对经主动脉瓣置入术(PARTNER) 2和SAPIEN 3登记进行分析,清楚地表明基线DD分级与1年后心血管死亡/再住院之间存在关联。这些先前的研究描述了一个一致的信息,即随着严重AS的DD等级和阶段的恶化,事件的风险增加。中度AS与DD的关系如何?在他们的心脏文章中,Stassen等人介绍了2001年10月至2019年12月期间来自三个学术机构的中度AS和左室收缩功能保留患者的大量注册数据。中度AS被定义为主动脉瓣面积在1.0 cm至1.5 cm之间。最后,回顾性纳入1247例中度AS患者,并根据指南分为舒张功能正常、不确定舒张功能和DD三组。该研究的目的是(1)评估DD的患病率,(2)检查DD对中度AS左室收缩功能保留的预后影响。主要结局为全因死亡率。次要结局是全因死亡率和手术或经导管AVR的综合结果。结果显示,中度AS患者经常出现DD(舒张功能正常:32%;舒张功能不确定:25%;弟弟:43%)。在中位53个月的随访中,39%的患者死亡。1年生存率为91%,5年生存率为65%。DD的存在与全因死亡率独立相关(HR: 1.37;95% CI 1.09 ~ 1.73)和全因死亡率和AVR的复合终点(HR: 1.24;95% CI 1.04 - 1.49),对几个临床变量进行校正(图1)。该研究的优势在于样本量大,数据收集设计良好。该研究的主要局限性包括分析的回顾性性质和缺乏验证队列。此外,在DD评估中的一个主要限制是使用指南算法有许多不确定的情况。与舒张功能正常的患者相比,不确定DD患者与更高的无事件生存率无关。此外,评估左室舒张功能的个体变量(E/ E′、左房容积指数和三尖瓣反流速度)与结果的相关性不高。由于指南算法存在一定的局限性,我们需要补充方法来确定DD的存在与否。在引入应变成像后,很明显左室射血分数正常的患者可能通过整体纵向应变轻度降低左室收缩功能。因此,左室应变成像是一种补充测试,当超声心动图舒张功能指标不确定时是有用的。Tastet等人表明,新的分期系统使用几个参数来表征AS的主动脉瓣外心脏损伤,包括全局纵向应变。 应变成像可为中度AS左室收缩功能保留的DD分级系统提供附加价值。缺乏心脏磁共振数据是另一个限制,因为在这个队列中没有排除心脏淀粉样变性。约30%的患者有利尿剂,约40%的患者属于纽约心脏协会II-IV级。该队列中约有一半的患者似乎是症状高发的中度AS患者。心房颤动(AF)在该队列中相对普遍(25%),尚不清楚AF患者是如何评估的。三个研究所对房颤患者超声心动图检查结果的差异可能会影响结果。在中位53个月的随访期间,初始诊断为中度AS的患者可以预期AS严重程度的进展。虽然这是一项评估不同类型的DD在诊断为中度AS时的预后意义的横断面研究,但尚不清楚进展为重度AS是否会导致随访期间的死亡率。AS进展对死亡率的影响需要在未来的研究中进一步明确。
{"title":"Is diastolic dysfunction a red flag sign in moderate aortic stenosis?","authors":"K. Kusunose","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321137","url":null,"abstract":"With rapidly ageing population, aortic stenosis (AS) has become one of the most common valvular heart diseases. Severe AS is clearly associated with increased mortality, and the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines designate a class I or IIa indication for aortic valve surgery in severe patients with AS with symptoms or with low left ventricular (LV) function. Historically, based on the lower risk of sudden death in moderate AS compared with severe AS, watchful observation was recommended to patients with moderate AS. In the last decade, prognostic findings on moderate AS have been gathered (table 1). A large echocardiographic national database study, including 3315 moderate AS with various LV systolic functions, suggested a poor survival rate (5year mortality: 56%). Recently, two academic institutional databases, including 1245 moderate AS, also showed poor prognosis during followup (median followup: 4.3 years; mortality: 45.3%). From a physiological viewpoint, narrowing of the aortic valve area leads to LV systolic/diastolic dysfunction due to LV pressure overloading. In patients with severe AS who particularly underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), diastolic dysfunction (DD) has been described as an early marker of myocardial damage and an important prognostic information. Thaden et al reported an association between echocardiographic data and outcomes from a retrospective singlecentre study. Over a mean followup period of 7.3 years, increased left atrial pressure based on the American Society of Echocardiography/ European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria remained an independent predictor of mortality after successful aortic valve replacement (AVR) (HR: 1.45; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.81). More recently, Ong et al clearly showed an association between DD grading at baseline and combined cardiovascular death/rehospitalisation at 1 year from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 2 and SAPIEN 3 registry analysed by core laboratories (n=1253). These previous studies described a consistent message of an increased risk of event with worsening grade and stage of DD in severe AS. What about the association of moderate AS with DD? In their Heart article, Stassen et al presented data from a large registry of patients with moderate AS and preserved LV systolic function from three academic institutions between October 2001 and December 2019. Moderate AS was defined as an aortic valve area of between 1.0 cm and 1.5 cm. Finally, 1247 patients with moderate AS were retrospectively included and divided into three groups (normal diastolic function, indeterminate diastolic function and DD) based on the guidelines. The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate the prevalence of DD and (2) to examine the prognostic implications of DD in moderate AS with preserved LV systolic function. The primary outcome was allcause mortality. The secondary outcome was a composite of allcause mortality ","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1340 - 1341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48473981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-10DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320886
J. Stassen, S. Ewe, S. Butcher, MR Ammanullah, K. Hirasawa, G. Singh, Z. Ding, SM Pio, N. Chew, C. Sia, W. Kong, K. Poh, N. Marsan, V. Delgado, Jeroen J. Bax
Objective To investigate the prognostic impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved LV systolic function. Methods Patients with a first diagnosis of moderate AS (aortic valve area >1.0 and ≤1.5 cm2) and preserved LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction ≥50%) were identified. LV diastolic function was evaluated using echocardiographic criteria according to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines. Clinical outcomes were defined as all-cause mortality and a composite of all-cause mortality and aortic valve replacement (AVR). Results Of 1247 patients (age 74±10 years, 47% men), 535 (43%) had LV diastolic dysfunction at baseline. Patients with LV diastolic dysfunction showed significantly higher mortality rates at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year follow-up (13%, 30% and 41%, respectively) when compared with patients with normal LV diastolic function (6%, 17% and 29%, respectively) (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, LV diastolic dysfunction was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.368; 95% CI 1.085 to 1.725; p=0.008) and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and AVR (HR 1.241; 95% CI 1.035 to 1.488; p=0.020). Conclusions LV diastolic dysfunction is independently associated with all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and AVR in patients with moderate AS and preserved LV systolic function. Assessment of LV diastolic function therefore contributes significantly to the risk stratification of patients with moderate AS. Future clinical trials are needed to investigate whether patients with moderate AS and LV diastolic dysfunction may benefit from earlier valve intervention.
{"title":"Prognostic implications of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis","authors":"J. Stassen, S. Ewe, S. Butcher, MR Ammanullah, K. Hirasawa, G. Singh, Z. Ding, SM Pio, N. Chew, C. Sia, W. Kong, K. Poh, N. Marsan, V. Delgado, Jeroen J. Bax","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320886","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320886","url":null,"abstract":"Objective To investigate the prognostic impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved LV systolic function. Methods Patients with a first diagnosis of moderate AS (aortic valve area >1.0 and ≤1.5 cm2) and preserved LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction ≥50%) were identified. LV diastolic function was evaluated using echocardiographic criteria according to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines. Clinical outcomes were defined as all-cause mortality and a composite of all-cause mortality and aortic valve replacement (AVR). Results Of 1247 patients (age 74±10 years, 47% men), 535 (43%) had LV diastolic dysfunction at baseline. Patients with LV diastolic dysfunction showed significantly higher mortality rates at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year follow-up (13%, 30% and 41%, respectively) when compared with patients with normal LV diastolic function (6%, 17% and 29%, respectively) (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, LV diastolic dysfunction was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.368; 95% CI 1.085 to 1.725; p=0.008) and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and AVR (HR 1.241; 95% CI 1.035 to 1.488; p=0.020). Conclusions LV diastolic dysfunction is independently associated with all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and AVR in patients with moderate AS and preserved LV systolic function. Assessment of LV diastolic function therefore contributes significantly to the risk stratification of patients with moderate AS. Future clinical trials are needed to investigate whether patients with moderate AS and LV diastolic dysfunction may benefit from earlier valve intervention.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1401 - 1407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44451136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-08DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321212
Chaowu Yan, L. Wan, Hua Li, Cheng Wang, Tingting Guo, Hanxu Niu, Shiguo Li, Pingcuo Yundan, Lei Wang, Wei Fang
Objective Preclinical research suggests that the combined use of radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation (CURB) could create stable interatrial communications without device implantation. This study examined the first in-human use of CURB for modified atrial septostomy in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods Between July 2018 and October 2021, CURB was performed in 19 patients with severe PAH (age: 31.5±9.1 years; mean pulmonary artery pressure: 73 mm Hg (IQR: 66–92); pulmonary vascular resistance: 18.7 Wood units (IQR: 17.8–23.3)). Under guidance of intracardiac echocardiography and three-dimensional location system, (1) fossae ovalis was reconstructed and ablated point-by-point with radiofrequency; (2) then graded balloon dilation was performed after transseptal puncture and the optimal size was determined according to the level of arterial oxygen saturation (SatO2); (3) radiofrequency ablation was repeated around the rims of the created fenestration. The interatrial fenestrations were followed-up serially. Results After CURB, the immediate fenestration size was 4.4 mm (IQR: 4.1–5.1) with intracardiac echocardiography, systolic aortic pressure increased by 10.2±6.9 mm Hg, cardiac index increased by 0.7±0.3 L/min/m2 and room-air resting SatO2 decreased by 6.2±1.9% (p<0.001). One patient experienced increased pericardiac effusion postoperatively; the others had no complications. On follow-up (median: 15.5 months), all interatrial communications were patent with stable size (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.96, 95%CI:0.89 to 0.99). The WHO functional class increased by 1 (IQR: 1–2) (p<0.001) with improvement of exercise capacity (+159.5 m, P<0.001). Conclusion The interatrial communications created with CURB in patients with severe PAH were stable and the mid-term outcomes were satisfactory. Trial registration number NCT03554330.
目的临床前研究表明,射频消融术和球囊扩张术(CURB)的联合使用可以在不植入设备的情况下建立稳定的室间通信。本研究首次在严重肺动脉高压(PAH)患者中使用CURB进行改良心房间隔造口术。方法在2018年7月至2021年10月期间,对19名严重PAH患者(年龄:31.5±9.1岁;平均肺动脉压:73 mm Hg(IQR:66-92);肺血管阻力18.7 Wood单位(IQR:17.8~23.3)。在心内超声心动图和三维定位系统的指导下,(1)用射频逐点重建和消融卵窝;(2) 然后在经中隔穿刺后进行分级球囊扩张,并根据动脉血氧饱和度(SatO2)水平确定最佳尺寸;(3) 射频消融术在开窗边缘重复进行。对术后开窗术进行了连续随访。结果CURB术后,心内超声心动图显示即刻开窗尺寸为4.4mm(IQR:4.1-5.1),主动脉收缩压增加10.2±6.9 mm Hg,心脏指数增加0.7±0.3 L/min/m2,室内静息血氧饱和度下降6.2±1.9%(p<0.001);其他人没有并发症。在随访中(中位数:15.5个月),所有的试验间交流都是稳定的(组内相关系数=0.96,95%CI:0.89~0.99)。世界卫生组织功能组增加1(IQR:1-2)(p<0.001),运动能力提高(+159.5 m,p<0.001)。试验注册号NCT03554330。
{"title":"First in-human modified atrial septostomy combining radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation","authors":"Chaowu Yan, L. Wan, Hua Li, Cheng Wang, Tingting Guo, Hanxu Niu, Shiguo Li, Pingcuo Yundan, Lei Wang, Wei Fang","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321212","url":null,"abstract":"Objective Preclinical research suggests that the combined use of radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation (CURB) could create stable interatrial communications without device implantation. This study examined the first in-human use of CURB for modified atrial septostomy in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods Between July 2018 and October 2021, CURB was performed in 19 patients with severe PAH (age: 31.5±9.1 years; mean pulmonary artery pressure: 73 mm Hg (IQR: 66–92); pulmonary vascular resistance: 18.7 Wood units (IQR: 17.8–23.3)). Under guidance of intracardiac echocardiography and three-dimensional location system, (1) fossae ovalis was reconstructed and ablated point-by-point with radiofrequency; (2) then graded balloon dilation was performed after transseptal puncture and the optimal size was determined according to the level of arterial oxygen saturation (SatO2); (3) radiofrequency ablation was repeated around the rims of the created fenestration. The interatrial fenestrations were followed-up serially. Results After CURB, the immediate fenestration size was 4.4 mm (IQR: 4.1–5.1) with intracardiac echocardiography, systolic aortic pressure increased by 10.2±6.9 mm Hg, cardiac index increased by 0.7±0.3 L/min/m2 and room-air resting SatO2 decreased by 6.2±1.9% (p<0.001). One patient experienced increased pericardiac effusion postoperatively; the others had no complications. On follow-up (median: 15.5 months), all interatrial communications were patent with stable size (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.96, 95%CI:0.89 to 0.99). The WHO functional class increased by 1 (IQR: 1–2) (p<0.001) with improvement of exercise capacity (+159.5 m, P<0.001). Conclusion The interatrial communications created with CURB in patients with severe PAH were stable and the mid-term outcomes were satisfactory. Trial registration number NCT03554330.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1690 - 1698"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48303908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-08DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321429
C. Otto
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major cause of death worldwide, with a higher prevalence in men compared with women. To further understand sex differences in SCD presentation and outcomes, Skjelbred and colleagues looked at data on deaths in Denmark in 2010 and found that SCD accounted for 12.7% of all deaths with a male predominant (56% men, 44% women). The average age at SCD was higher in women (79 years) compared with men (71 years), with the greatest sex difference in SCD incidence rates in the age group from 35 to 50 years (incidence rate ratio 3.7, 95% CI 2.8 to 4.8) (figure 1). Women, compared with men, more often died at home (80.5% vs 69.7%, p<0.01) rather than in the hospital (16.8% vs 22.2%, p<0.01). The cause of SCD was coronary artery disease in about 40% of cases. Other causes (each <5%) included cardiac arrhythmias, heart failure, aortic dissection, valve disease and cardiomyopathy. In the accompanying editorial, Tan and Remme suggest that SCD risk relates not only to biological sex differences but also to societal and environmental factors. In men, the cause of SCD usually is coronary artery disease and the initial rhythm typically is ventricular fibrillation. In contrast, the cause of SCD in women more often is ventricular hypertrophy, aortic dissection or myocarditis and the initial rhythm is likely to be pulseless electrical activity or asystole. Women also are more likely to have an unwitnessed event at home, thus, not receiving prompt resuscitation. Even when witnessed, women are less likely to be resuscitated by bystanders; the combination of a longer delay to resuscitation plus the low frequency of a shockable rhythm results in lower survival rates. The authors urge increased research and action to reduce the risk of SCD in both women and men. ‘Clearly, to reduce the societal burden of SCD, we must focus our efforts on earlier recognition of SCA risk. Given the complex underlying causes of SCA and in view of the observation that our ability at early recognition has been stagnant over the last decades, we must adopt a more comprehensive strategy and reap the benefit of relatively new methods which have so far been poorly used in SCA research, for example, artificial intelligencebased analysis of large data sets, genetic analysis and metabolomic analysis. We must also recognise that we should direct our view to the group in society that has so far received insufficient attention in SCA research, that is, individuals who are in the care of their general practitioner and have not (yet) been referred to a cardiologist.’ (figure 2). Another study in this issue of Heart addresses sex (biological) and gender (sociocultural) differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Based
心脏性猝死(SCD)是世界范围内的一个主要死亡原因,男性的患病率高于女性。为了进一步了解SCD表现和结果的性别差异,Skjelbred及其同事查看了2010年丹麦的死亡数据,发现SCD占所有死亡人数的12.7%,其中男性占56%,女性占44%。女性患SCD的平均年龄(79岁)高于男性(71岁),在35岁至50岁年龄组中,SCD发病率的性别差异最大(发病率比3.7,95% CI 2.8至4.8)(图1)。与男性相比,女性更常死于家中(80.5%对69.7%,p<0.01)而不是医院(16.8%对22.2%,p<0.01)。约40%的SCD的病因是冠状动脉疾病。其他原因(均<5%)包括心律失常、心力衰竭、主动脉夹层、瓣膜疾病和心肌病。在随后的社论中,Tan和Remme认为SCD风险不仅与生理性别差异有关,还与社会和环境因素有关。在男性中,SCD的病因通常是冠状动脉疾病,最初的心律通常是心室颤动。相反,女性SCD的病因通常是心室肥大、主动脉夹层或心肌炎,最初的节律可能是无脉性电活动或心脏骤停。女性也更有可能在家中发生无人目击的事件,因此没有得到及时的复苏。即使有目击者在场,妇女也不太可能被旁观者救活;较长的复苏延迟加上较低频率的震荡心律导致较低的存活率。作者敦促增加研究和行动,以降低女性和男性患SCD的风险。“显然,为了减轻SCD的社会负担,我们必须集中精力及早发现SCA风险。”考虑到SCA的复杂潜在原因,并考虑到我们的早期识别能力在过去几十年里一直停滞不前,我们必须采取更全面的策略,并从迄今为止在SCA研究中使用较少的相对较新的方法中获益,例如,基于人工智能的大型数据集分析、遗传分析和代谢组学分析。我们还必须认识到,我们应该把我们的观点指向社会上迄今为止在SCA研究中没有得到足够关注的群体,也就是说,那些由全科医生照顾的个人,还没有被转介给心脏病专家。(图2)本期《心脏》杂志的另一项研究探讨了心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素中的性别(生物学)和性别(社会文化)差异。基于
{"title":"Heartbeat: sex-based discrepancies in survival from sudden cardiac death","authors":"C. Otto","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321429","url":null,"abstract":"Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major cause of death worldwide, with a higher prevalence in men compared with women. To further understand sex differences in SCD presentation and outcomes, Skjelbred and colleagues looked at data on deaths in Denmark in 2010 and found that SCD accounted for 12.7% of all deaths with a male predominant (56% men, 44% women). The average age at SCD was higher in women (79 years) compared with men (71 years), with the greatest sex difference in SCD incidence rates in the age group from 35 to 50 years (incidence rate ratio 3.7, 95% CI 2.8 to 4.8) (figure 1). Women, compared with men, more often died at home (80.5% vs 69.7%, p<0.01) rather than in the hospital (16.8% vs 22.2%, p<0.01). The cause of SCD was coronary artery disease in about 40% of cases. Other causes (each <5%) included cardiac arrhythmias, heart failure, aortic dissection, valve disease and cardiomyopathy. In the accompanying editorial, Tan and Remme suggest that SCD risk relates not only to biological sex differences but also to societal and environmental factors. In men, the cause of SCD usually is coronary artery disease and the initial rhythm typically is ventricular fibrillation. In contrast, the cause of SCD in women more often is ventricular hypertrophy, aortic dissection or myocarditis and the initial rhythm is likely to be pulseless electrical activity or asystole. Women also are more likely to have an unwitnessed event at home, thus, not receiving prompt resuscitation. Even when witnessed, women are less likely to be resuscitated by bystanders; the combination of a longer delay to resuscitation plus the low frequency of a shockable rhythm results in lower survival rates. The authors urge increased research and action to reduce the risk of SCD in both women and men. ‘Clearly, to reduce the societal burden of SCD, we must focus our efforts on earlier recognition of SCA risk. Given the complex underlying causes of SCA and in view of the observation that our ability at early recognition has been stagnant over the last decades, we must adopt a more comprehensive strategy and reap the benefit of relatively new methods which have so far been poorly used in SCA research, for example, artificial intelligencebased analysis of large data sets, genetic analysis and metabolomic analysis. We must also recognise that we should direct our view to the group in society that has so far received insufficient attention in SCA research, that is, individuals who are in the care of their general practitioner and have not (yet) been referred to a cardiologist.’ (figure 2). Another study in this issue of Heart addresses sex (biological) and gender (sociocultural) differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Based","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"989 - 991"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43268536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-08DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321135
Abdallah Al-Mohammad
{"title":"Risk of recurrent infective endocarditis: what do we learn from the Euro-ENDO study?","authors":"Abdallah Al-Mohammad","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321135","DOIUrl":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321135","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43028044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-08DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320831
A. Ioannou
20 Webb JG, Pate GE, Munt BI. Percutaneous closure of an aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak with an Amplatzer duct occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:69–72. 21 Piéchaud JF. Percutaneous closure of mitral paravalvular leak. J Interv Cardiol 2003;16:153–5. 22 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: acute and 30day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:314–21. 23 Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2210–7. 24 Millán X, Bouhout I, Nozza A, et al. Surgery Versus Transcatheter Interventions for Significant Paravalvular Prosthetic Leaks. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1959–69. 25 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. The learning curve in percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: an analysis of 200 cases. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:521–9. 26 Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the InterAmerican Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging . Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:589–90. 27 Hascoet S, Smolka G, Bagate F, et al. Multimodality imaging guidance for percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: insights from the multicentre FFPP register. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018;111:421–31. 28 Lesser JR, Han BK, Newell M, et al. Use of cardiac CT angiography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak: a practical guide. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9:159–64. 29 Suh YJ, Hong GR, Han K, et al. Assessment of mitral paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical findings. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9. 30 de Agustin JA, JimenezQuevedo P, NombelaFranco L, et al. Paravalvular mitral leak closure under EcoXray fusion guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:586. 31 Faletra FF, Pozzoli A, Agricola E, et al. Echocardiographicfluoroscopic fusion imaging for transcatheter mitral valve repair guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:715–26. 32 Gafoor S, Steinberg DH, Franke J, et al. Tools and techniques--clinical: paravalvular leak closure. EuroIntervention 2014;9:1359–63. 33 Calvert PA, Northridge DB, Malik IS, et al. Percutaneous device closure of paravalvular leak: combined experience from the United Kingdom and Ireland. Circulation 2016;134:934–44. 34 García E, Arzamendi D, JimenezQuevedo P, et al. Outcomes and predictors of success and complications for paravalvular leak closure: an analysis of the Spanish realworld paravalvular leaks closure (HOLE) registry. EuroIntervention 2017;12:1962–8. 35 AnguloLlanos R, SarnagoCebada F, Rivera AR, et al. Twoyear follow up after surgical
{"title":"An interesting case of fever and left ventricular systolic dysfunction","authors":"A. Ioannou","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320831","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320831","url":null,"abstract":"20 Webb JG, Pate GE, Munt BI. Percutaneous closure of an aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak with an Amplatzer duct occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:69–72. 21 Piéchaud JF. Percutaneous closure of mitral paravalvular leak. J Interv Cardiol 2003;16:153–5. 22 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: acute and 30day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:314–21. 23 Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2210–7. 24 Millán X, Bouhout I, Nozza A, et al. Surgery Versus Transcatheter Interventions for Significant Paravalvular Prosthetic Leaks. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1959–69. 25 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. The learning curve in percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: an analysis of 200 cases. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:521–9. 26 Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the InterAmerican Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging . Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:589–90. 27 Hascoet S, Smolka G, Bagate F, et al. Multimodality imaging guidance for percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: insights from the multicentre FFPP register. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018;111:421–31. 28 Lesser JR, Han BK, Newell M, et al. Use of cardiac CT angiography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak: a practical guide. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9:159–64. 29 Suh YJ, Hong GR, Han K, et al. Assessment of mitral paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical findings. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9. 30 de Agustin JA, JimenezQuevedo P, NombelaFranco L, et al. Paravalvular mitral leak closure under EcoXray fusion guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:586. 31 Faletra FF, Pozzoli A, Agricola E, et al. Echocardiographicfluoroscopic fusion imaging for transcatheter mitral valve repair guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:715–26. 32 Gafoor S, Steinberg DH, Franke J, et al. Tools and techniques--clinical: paravalvular leak closure. EuroIntervention 2014;9:1359–63. 33 Calvert PA, Northridge DB, Malik IS, et al. Percutaneous device closure of paravalvular leak: combined experience from the United Kingdom and Ireland. Circulation 2016;134:934–44. 34 García E, Arzamendi D, JimenezQuevedo P, et al. Outcomes and predictors of success and complications for paravalvular leak closure: an analysis of the Spanish realworld paravalvular leaks closure (HOLE) registry. EuroIntervention 2017;12:1962–8. 35 AnguloLlanos R, SarnagoCebada F, Rivera AR, et al. Twoyear follow up after surgical","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1011 - 1074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43925789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-08DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321214
R. Alharethi, R. A. Butschek, Kismet Rasmusson, B. Whisenant
With recent advancements in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) including the addition of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and transcatheter edgetoedge mitral valve repair (TEER), the treatment of patients with cardiomyopathy and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) has become increasingly complex and can lead to suboptimal utilisation of indicated therapies. Tanaka and colleagues have provided a realworld analysis of guidelinedirected medical therapy (GDMT) among HFREF patients with SMR and managed with TEER. Their findings reinforce the importance of engaging focused heart failure (HF) cardiologists and allied teams to optimise medical therapy before and after TEER. Consistent with the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guideline on HF management, the authors define GDMT as modulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems with triple therapy including renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, betablockers (BBs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) noting that SGLT2is were approved after study completion. Their results demonstrated the clinical benefits of maintaining triple therapy neuromodulation following TEER. They have thus provided a pragmatic and simple threshold of GDMT that will undoubtedly improve the care of patients with SMR undergoing TEER. Tanaka et al retrospectively divided patients with SMR and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% who underwent TEER into GDMT and nonGDMT cohorts. Local heart teams optimised medical therapy and decided when to perform TEER. As such, this is a realworld population of patients with SMR managed with TEER. GDMT was defined as patients who received triple therapy at the time of discharge with RAS inhibitors, BBs and MRAs of any doses. Nevertheless, among the GDMT cohort, only 21% of patients received target doses of BBs, and only 12% received target doses of RAS inhibitors. NonGDMT patients were prescribed optimal medical therapy per the local heart team consensus including BBs in 84% (16% with target doses), and RAS inhibitors in 60% (12% at target doses). While all GDMT patients were prescribed MRAs, only 22% of nonGDMT patients were prescribed MRAs. Among patients without GDMT, 42% had factors related to ineligibility (ie, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, heart rate <60 bpm or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/m). This underscores the difference between relative ineligibility to a medication and the intolerance to this medication with the inherent complexity of providing detailed reasons for intolerance of GDMT, which were not recorded in this study. We are not sure if the lack of triple therapy in the nonGDMT cohort and the less than target doses of medications in both cohorts represents the absolute maximally tolerated medical therapy. Twoyear mortality was compared between groups after calculating propensity scores and performing
随着最近在治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)方面的进展,包括血管紧张素受体- neprilysin抑制剂、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和经导管边缘二尖瓣修复(TEER),心肌病和继发性二尖瓣反流(SMR)患者的治疗变得越来越复杂,并可能导致适应症治疗的次优利用。Tanaka及其同事对伴有SMR的HFREF患者的指导药物治疗(GDMT)进行了现实分析,并采用TEER进行管理。他们的研究结果强调了专注心力衰竭(HF)心脏病专家和相关团队在TEER前后优化药物治疗的重要性。与2021年欧洲心脏病学会心衰管理指南一致,作者将GDMT定义为通过包括肾素血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂(BBs)和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)在内的三联疗法调节肾素血管紧张素醛酮和交感神经系统,并指出SGLT2is在研究完成后获得批准。他们的结果证明了TEER后维持三联疗法神经调节的临床益处。因此,他们提供了一个实用而简单的GDMT阈值,这无疑将改善SMR患者接受TEER的护理。Tanaka等回顾性地将接受TEER的SMR和左室射血分数(LVEF) <50%的患者分为GDMT和非ongdmt两组。当地心脏团队优化了医疗治疗并决定了何时进行TEER。因此,这是一个用TEER治疗SMR患者的真实世界人群。GDMT被定义为在出院时接受任何剂量的RAS抑制剂、BBs和mra三联治疗的患者。然而,在GDMT队列中,只有21%的患者接受了目标剂量的BBs,只有12%的患者接受了目标剂量的RAS抑制剂。根据当地心脏团队共识,NonGDMT患者被处方最佳药物治疗,包括84%的bb(16%的目标剂量)和60%的RAS抑制剂(12%的目标剂量)。虽然所有GDMT患者都开了mra,但只有22%的非ongdmt患者开了mra。在没有GDMT的患者中,42%存在与不合格相关的因素(即收缩压<100 mm Hg,心率<60 bpm或估计肾小球滤过率<30 mL/min/m)。这强调了一种药物的相对不适宜性和对这种药物的不耐受之间的差异,提供GDMT不耐受的详细原因固有的复杂性,这在本研究中没有记录。我们不确定在nonGDMT队列中缺乏三联治疗以及两个队列中低于目标剂量的药物是否代表绝对最大耐受的药物治疗。在计算倾向得分并进行治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)分析后,比较两组之间的两年死亡率。三联治疗GDMT (BBs、RAS抑制剂和MRAs)出院的患者死亡率明显低于未治疗GDMT出院的患者(19.8% vs 31.1%, p=0.011)。与没有GDMT的患者相比,患有GDMT的患者在TEER后1年的左心室反向重构率同样更高。正如作者所指出的,这项研究必须在回顾性观察性研究的限制范围内进行解释。虽然作者试图通过使用IPTWadjusted方法来纠正选择偏差,但混杂因素可能会影响结果。耐受三联治疗GDMT的能力可能预示着良好的预后。三联治疗GDMT出院的患者年龄较小,肾功能较好,血液透析较少。然而,作者提出的明显结论是,优化RAS抑制剂、BBs和MRAs联合药物治疗对于改善因SMR接受TEER治疗的患者的临床结果至关重要。GDMT的工作定义为BBs、RAS抑制剂和MRAs的三重神经激素抑制,可作为考虑TEER的最低阈值,并作为TEER后出院的优先考虑。两组患者的靶剂量率相对较低,这强调了实现靶剂量的难度,以及让心衰专家参与HFrEF患者管理的重要性。在MitraClip经皮治疗心力衰竭合并功能性二尖瓣反流(COAPT)试验的患者心血管结局评估中,8.65%随机分组至TEER和GDMT的患者开始新的BB或将当前BB剂量增加100%,而仅随机分组至GDMT的患者为3.8% (p=0.01),这与TEER增加收缩压并促进强化药物治疗的常见临床观察一致。 重要的是,考虑到TEER后随访中GDMT剂量没有显著变化,Tanaka研究再次证明了纵向护理的必要性,并持续不断地尝试寻找最大耐受剂量的GDMT。这些TEER发现反映了其他几个关于HFrEF患者GDMT利用不足的研究结果。2018年,改变心力衰竭患者的管理,CHAMPSHF登记收集了社区心脏病学和初级保健实践中的GDMT率,揭示了HFrEF患者适当治疗的利用率惊人不足(如前所述,不到25%的患者接受了三联治疗,只有1%的患者接受了目标剂量)。在2021年通过患者和医院参与心力衰竭临床试验的护理优化中,CONNECTHF研究再次证实了GDMT优化方面的持续差距,该研究显示,尽管医院和出院后质量得到了改善,但GDMT率仍未达到最佳水平。植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步装置研究发现,在植入ICD/心脏再同步装置之前和之后,心衰药物治疗都是按照规定进行的,在心律装置治疗后,最佳药物治疗的患者生存率提高,心衰住院率降低。最近的HFrEF指南将“改进型LVEF”一词编入了美国犹他州默里市山间医学中心心脏病科的既往HFrEF患者
{"title":"The synergy of myopathic valvular disease","authors":"R. Alharethi, R. A. Butschek, Kismet Rasmusson, B. Whisenant","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321214","url":null,"abstract":"With recent advancements in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) including the addition of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and transcatheter edgetoedge mitral valve repair (TEER), the treatment of patients with cardiomyopathy and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) has become increasingly complex and can lead to suboptimal utilisation of indicated therapies. Tanaka and colleagues have provided a realworld analysis of guidelinedirected medical therapy (GDMT) among HFREF patients with SMR and managed with TEER. Their findings reinforce the importance of engaging focused heart failure (HF) cardiologists and allied teams to optimise medical therapy before and after TEER. Consistent with the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guideline on HF management, the authors define GDMT as modulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems with triple therapy including renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, betablockers (BBs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) noting that SGLT2is were approved after study completion. Their results demonstrated the clinical benefits of maintaining triple therapy neuromodulation following TEER. They have thus provided a pragmatic and simple threshold of GDMT that will undoubtedly improve the care of patients with SMR undergoing TEER. Tanaka et al retrospectively divided patients with SMR and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% who underwent TEER into GDMT and nonGDMT cohorts. Local heart teams optimised medical therapy and decided when to perform TEER. As such, this is a realworld population of patients with SMR managed with TEER. GDMT was defined as patients who received triple therapy at the time of discharge with RAS inhibitors, BBs and MRAs of any doses. Nevertheless, among the GDMT cohort, only 21% of patients received target doses of BBs, and only 12% received target doses of RAS inhibitors. NonGDMT patients were prescribed optimal medical therapy per the local heart team consensus including BBs in 84% (16% with target doses), and RAS inhibitors in 60% (12% at target doses). While all GDMT patients were prescribed MRAs, only 22% of nonGDMT patients were prescribed MRAs. Among patients without GDMT, 42% had factors related to ineligibility (ie, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, heart rate <60 bpm or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/m). This underscores the difference between relative ineligibility to a medication and the intolerance to this medication with the inherent complexity of providing detailed reasons for intolerance of GDMT, which were not recorded in this study. We are not sure if the lack of triple therapy in the nonGDMT cohort and the less than target doses of medications in both cohorts represents the absolute maximally tolerated medical therapy. Twoyear mortality was compared between groups after calculating propensity scores and performing ","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1670 - 1671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44168303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-07DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320826
Tetsu Tanaka, R. Kavsur, M. Spieker, C. Iliadis, C. Metze, Birthe M Brachtendorf, P. Horn, C. Zachoval, A. Sugiura, M. Kelm, S. Baldus, G. Nickenig, R. Westenfeld, R. Pfister, M. Becher
Objective A sizeable proportion of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) do not receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF). We investigated the association between the use of GDMT and mortality in patients with SMR who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Methods We retrospectively analysed patients with SMR and a left ventricular ejection fraction of <50% who underwent TEER at three centres. According to current HF guidelines, GDMT was defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patients were divided into two groups: GDMT and non-GDMT groups. We calculated the propensity scores and carried out inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to compare 2-year mortality between the two groups. Results Of 463 patients, 228 (49.2%) were treated with GDMT upon discharge. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve showed patients with GDMT had a lower incidence of mortality than those without GDMT (19.8% vs 31.1%, p=0.011). In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, GDMT was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.95; p=0.030), which was consistent among clinical subgroups. Moreover, patients with GDMT had a higher rate of left ventricular reverse remodelling at 1 year after TEER than those without GDMT. Conclusion GDMT, defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors and MRAs, was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality after TEER for SMR. Optimisation of medical therapy is crucial to improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TEER for SMR.
目的相当大比例的继发性二尖瓣返流(SMR)患者未接受心力衰竭(HF)的指导药物治疗(GDMT)。我们调查了接受经导管边缘到边缘修复(TEER)的SMR患者使用GDMT与死亡率之间的关系。方法我们回顾性分析了在三个中心接受TEER治疗的SMR和左心室射血分数<50%的患者。根据目前的HF指南,GDMT被定义为由β受体阻滞剂、肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)组成的三联疗法。患者分为GDMT组和非GDMT组。我们计算倾向得分,并进行治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)分析,比较两组的2年死亡率。结果463例患者中,228例(49.2%)在出院时接受了GDMT治疗。经iptw校正的Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,GDMT患者的死亡率低于未GDMT患者(19.8% vs 31.1%, p=0.011)。在iptw校正的Cox比例风险分析中,GDMT与2年死亡风险降低相关(HR: 0.58;95% CI: 0.35 ~ 0.95;P =0.030),这在临床亚组中是一致的。此外,与没有GDMT的患者相比,有GDMT的患者在TEER后1年的左心室反向重构率更高。结论GDMT,定义为由β受体阻滞剂、RAS抑制剂和MRAs组成的三联疗法,与SMR患者TEER后2年死亡率降低相关。优化药物治疗对于改善因SMR而接受TEER治疗的患者的临床结果至关重要。
{"title":"Guideline-directed medical therapy after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair","authors":"Tetsu Tanaka, R. Kavsur, M. Spieker, C. Iliadis, C. Metze, Birthe M Brachtendorf, P. Horn, C. Zachoval, A. Sugiura, M. Kelm, S. Baldus, G. Nickenig, R. Westenfeld, R. Pfister, M. Becher","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320826","url":null,"abstract":"Objective A sizeable proportion of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) do not receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF). We investigated the association between the use of GDMT and mortality in patients with SMR who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Methods We retrospectively analysed patients with SMR and a left ventricular ejection fraction of <50% who underwent TEER at three centres. According to current HF guidelines, GDMT was defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patients were divided into two groups: GDMT and non-GDMT groups. We calculated the propensity scores and carried out inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to compare 2-year mortality between the two groups. Results Of 463 patients, 228 (49.2%) were treated with GDMT upon discharge. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve showed patients with GDMT had a lower incidence of mortality than those without GDMT (19.8% vs 31.1%, p=0.011). In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, GDMT was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.95; p=0.030), which was consistent among clinical subgroups. Moreover, patients with GDMT had a higher rate of left ventricular reverse remodelling at 1 year after TEER than those without GDMT. Conclusion GDMT, defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors and MRAs, was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality after TEER for SMR. Optimisation of medical therapy is crucial to improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TEER for SMR.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1722 - 1728"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48787144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-01DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321056
Janet I Ma, D. Defaria Yeh, Ada C. Stefanescu Schmidt
While global maternal mortality has decreased in the last three decades, pregnancyrelated deaths remain prevalent in the USA, even after accounting for possible overreporting based on changes in death certificates. In 2017, approximately 17 US mothers per 100 000 live births died due to complications related to pregnancy or childbirth; in contrast, only 7 UK mothers per 100 000 live births died that year. Up to twothirds of US maternal deaths may have been preventable. Cardiovascular disease has emerged as the driving cause of current maternal mortality rates, causing or related to over onethird of US maternal deaths, with most deaths occurring during or after delivery. Recent studies worldwide have also begun to elucidate the longterm consequences of pregnancyrelated cardiovascular conditions such as gestational hypertension or preeclampsia 6 ; for instance, a largescale population study in the UK found hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increased risk across a multitude of cardiovascular disorders with the impact starting soon after pregnancy. In the USA, preeclampsiarelated deaths have decreased in the last two decades, while deaths associated with or due to chronic hypertension have been increasing. However, one striking difference between the USA and similarly wealthy countries, which may contribute to rising maternal mortality, is its fragmented insurance coverage. Marschner et al give readers a revealing snapshot of the intersection between cardiovascular maternal health and insurance coverage in an important and unique US demographic, pregnant women covered under Medicaid. As the US public insurance programme aimed to improve access to basic healthcare for those otherwise cannot afford it, Medicaid plays a pivotal role in supporting pregnant women living in poverty and currently provides coverage for half of all US births. Marschner et al take a deeper dive into the Medicaid population by exploring pregnancyrelated cardiovascular conditions and early postnatal adverse outcomes among Medicaidinsured pregnant women in three states in the USA between 2015 and 2019. They found that a striking onefourth of these women were diagnosed with a pregnancyrelated cardiometabolic condition, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational or preexisting diabetes. Furthermore, between pregnancy and 60 days after delivery, over onetenth of these women were found to have a severe cardiovascular outcome, including heart failure, pulmonary embolism, stroke, cardiac arrest and myocardial infarction. Their study concluded that any type of pregnancyrelated cardiometabolic condition is associated with a threefold higher risk of a severe cardiovascular outcome. Marschner et al point out that current literature suggests the Medicaid population is at much higher risk of pregnancyrelated cardiometabolic conditions compared with those who have private insurance. Their analysis is based on claims data submitted to one Medicaid management company (the m
{"title":"Disparities in cardiovascular maternal health","authors":"Janet I Ma, D. Defaria Yeh, Ada C. Stefanescu Schmidt","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321056","url":null,"abstract":"While global maternal mortality has decreased in the last three decades, pregnancyrelated deaths remain prevalent in the USA, even after accounting for possible overreporting based on changes in death certificates. In 2017, approximately 17 US mothers per 100 000 live births died due to complications related to pregnancy or childbirth; in contrast, only 7 UK mothers per 100 000 live births died that year. Up to twothirds of US maternal deaths may have been preventable. Cardiovascular disease has emerged as the driving cause of current maternal mortality rates, causing or related to over onethird of US maternal deaths, with most deaths occurring during or after delivery. Recent studies worldwide have also begun to elucidate the longterm consequences of pregnancyrelated cardiovascular conditions such as gestational hypertension or preeclampsia 6 ; for instance, a largescale population study in the UK found hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increased risk across a multitude of cardiovascular disorders with the impact starting soon after pregnancy. In the USA, preeclampsiarelated deaths have decreased in the last two decades, while deaths associated with or due to chronic hypertension have been increasing. However, one striking difference between the USA and similarly wealthy countries, which may contribute to rising maternal mortality, is its fragmented insurance coverage. Marschner et al give readers a revealing snapshot of the intersection between cardiovascular maternal health and insurance coverage in an important and unique US demographic, pregnant women covered under Medicaid. As the US public insurance programme aimed to improve access to basic healthcare for those otherwise cannot afford it, Medicaid plays a pivotal role in supporting pregnant women living in poverty and currently provides coverage for half of all US births. Marschner et al take a deeper dive into the Medicaid population by exploring pregnancyrelated cardiovascular conditions and early postnatal adverse outcomes among Medicaidinsured pregnant women in three states in the USA between 2015 and 2019. They found that a striking onefourth of these women were diagnosed with a pregnancyrelated cardiometabolic condition, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational or preexisting diabetes. Furthermore, between pregnancy and 60 days after delivery, over onetenth of these women were found to have a severe cardiovascular outcome, including heart failure, pulmonary embolism, stroke, cardiac arrest and myocardial infarction. Their study concluded that any type of pregnancyrelated cardiometabolic condition is associated with a threefold higher risk of a severe cardiovascular outcome. Marschner et al point out that current literature suggests the Medicaid population is at much higher risk of pregnancyrelated cardiometabolic conditions compared with those who have private insurance. Their analysis is based on claims data submitted to one Medicaid management company (the m","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1504 - 1505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41915736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}