Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)最新文献

The diagnosis and treatment of malignant lymphoma is rapidly advancing, offering hope but also highlighting inherent limitations. Technological breakthroughs in sequencing technologies enable more precise subtyping and risk stratification. For example, in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), exome sequencing revealed molecular subtypes. Understanding these subtypes sheds light on lymphomagenesis and prognosis, and may provide targets for tailored therapies. Additionally, tumor-derived cell-free DNA (ctDNA) detected in blood plasma allows for genotyping, risk stratification, and measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD). Current studies often examine drug effectiveness through "all-comer" approaches or in transcriptionally defined subtypes. Molecular agnostic studies increasingly focus on clinically defined high-risk patients (e.g., using the IPI) to better demonstrate the statistical significance of therapy effects. Improved patient selection can enhance the cost-effectiveness of modern, often expensive, therapies.

Advances in the understanding of the biology of malignant lymphoma has facilitated the development of numerous molecularly targeted therapies. The incorporation of these precision therapeutics has produced more effective and often less-toxic treatment regimens leading to a significant improvement of treatment outcomes for individuals with lymphoid malignancies.In relapsed diseases, molecularly targeted therapeutic approaches have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to conventional chemotherapy, leading to a growing number of patients being treated entirely chemotherapy-free. This review outlines the current landscape of targeted therapies for both B-cell (B-NHL) and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (T-NHL) and provides an overview of targeted agents currently approved for the treatment of malignant lymphoma.

The introduction of immunologically targeted therapies has represented a significant advancement in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas, particularly aggressive B-cell lymphoma. CD19 CAR-T cells such as Axicabtagen-Ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Lisocabtagen Maraleucel (Liso-cel) have been approved since 2022 and 2023, respectively, for second-line therapy of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL), when there is primary refractory disease or relapse within 12 months after the end of first-line therapy. These therapies result in a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to the previous standard therapy (salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation). Especially in elderly patients or patients with underlying medical conditions, CAR-T cell therapies like Axi-cel and Liso-cel demonstrate acceptable tolerability and high efficacy.Furthermore, bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies ("bispecifics") such as Glofitamab, Epcoritamab, and Mosunetuzumab also represent promising treatment options for patients with relapsed disease after failure of second- or later line therapy and show efficacy even in a subset of patients relapsing after CD19 CAR-T cells. However, randomized study results for these substances are not yet available. They are expected to be used in earlier lines of therapy in the future, especially in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens. Common side effects of bispecific antibody therapies are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune-mediated cytopenias, whereas immune-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is relatively rare compared to CD19 CAR T cells. In summary, bispecifics represent a novel, highly effective immunotherapy for the treatment of lymphomas with a very favourable toxicity profile.

Medicine in Germany is currently facing major structural and economic challenges. Infectious Diseases, with the recent introduction of a new specialty in "Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases" and with the existing additional training for almost all specializations, will make an important contribution to overcoming these challenges. Expertise in infectious diseases has to be very broad and requires high interdisciplinarity, which makes infectious diseases an attractive and demanding specialty. The complex fundamentals of infectious diseases must now be quickly conveyed to as many physicians as possible in a short period of time, as part of their specialization or as additional training. Until this is achieved, transitional solutions will be necessary for some time. The adaptation of the current billing and reimbursement system for infectious diseases services and improved intersectoral cooperation are of the utmost importance for the further development of the specialty.