Expert opinion on drug delivery最新文献

Introduction: Chronic wounds require more sophisticated care than standard wound care because they are becoming more severe as a result of diseases like diabetes. By resolving shortcomings in existing methods, 3D-bioprinting offers a viable path toward personalized, mechanically strong, and cell-stimulating wound dressings.

Areas covered: This review highlights the drawbacks of traditional approaches while navigating the difficulties of managing chronic wounds. The conversation revolves around employing natural biomaterials for customized dressings, with a particular emphasis on 3D-bioprinting. A thorough understanding of the uses of 3D-printed dressings in a range of chronic wound scenarios is provided by insights into recent research and patents.

Expert opinion: The expert view recognizes wounds as a historical human ailment and emphasizes the growing difficulties and expenses related to wound treatment. The expert acknowledges that 3D printing is revolutionary, but also points out that it is still in its infancy and has the potential to enhance mass production rather than replace it. The review highlights the benefits of 3D printing for wound dressings by providing instances of smart materials that improve treatment results by stimulating angiogenesis, reducing pain, and targeting particular enzymes. The expert advises taking action to convert the technology's prospective advantages into real benefits for patients, even in the face of resistance to change in the healthcare industry. It is believed that the increasing evidence from in-vivo studies is promising and represents a positive change in the treatment of chronic wounds toward sophisticated 3D-printed dressings.

Introduction: 3D Printing (3DP) is an innovative fabrication technology that has gained enormous popularity through its paradigm shifts in manufacturing in several disciplines, including healthcare. In this past decade, we have witnessed the impact of 3DP in drug product development. Almost 8 years after the first USFDA approval of the 3D printed tablet Levetiracetam (Spritam), the interest in 3DP for drug products is high. However, regulatory agencies have often questioned its large-scale industrial practicability, and 3DP drug approval/guidelines are yet to be streamlined.

Areas covered: In this review, major technologies involved with the fabrication of drug products are introduced along with the prospects of upcoming technologies, including AI (Artificial Intelligence). We have touched upon regulatory updates and discussed the burning limitations, which require immediate focus, illuminating status, and future perspectives on the near future of 3DP in the pharmaceutical field.

Expert opinion: 3DP offers significant advantages in rapid prototyping for drug products, which could be beneficial for personalizing patient-based pharmaceutical dispensing. It seems inevitable that the coming decades will be marked by exponential growth in personalization, and 3DP could be a paradigm-shifting asset for pharmaceutical professionals.

Background: Pain is characterized as a major symptom induced by tissue damage occurring from surgical procedures, whose potency is being experienced subjectively, while current pain relief strategies are not always efficient in providing individualized treatment. 3D printed implantable devices hold the potential to offer a precise and customized medicinal approach, targeting both tissue engineering and drug delivery.

Research design and methods: Polycaprolactone (PCL) and PCL - chitosan (CS) composite scaffolds loaded with procaine (PRC) were fabricated by bioprinting. Geometrical features including dimensions, pattern, and infill of the scaffolds were mathematically optimized and digitally determined, aiming at developing structurally uniform 3D printed models. Printability studies based on thermal imaging of the bioprinting system were performed, and physicochemical, surface, and mechanical attributes of the extruded scaffolds were evaluated. The release rate of PRC was examined at different time intervals up to 1 week.

Results: Physicochemical stability and mechanical integrity of the scaffolds were studied, while in vitro drug release studies revealed that CS contributes to the sustained release dynamic of PRC.

Conclusions: The printing extrusion process was capable of developing implantable devices for a local and sustained delivery of PRC as a 7-day adjuvant regimen in post-operative pain management.

Introduction: Three-Dimensional (3D) microneedles have recently gained significant attention due to their versatility, biocompatibility, enhanced permeation, and predictable behavior. The incorporation of biological agents into these 3D constructs has advanced the traditional microneedle into an effective platform for wide-ranging applications.

Areas covered: This review discusses the current state of microneedle fabrication as well as the developed 3D printed microneedles incorporating labile pharmaceutical agents and biological materials for potential biomedical applications. The mechanical and processing considerations for the preparation of microneedles and the barriers to effective 3D printing of microneedle constructs have additionally been reviewed along with their therapeutic applications and potential for tissue engineering and regenerative applications. Additionally, the regulatory considerations for microneedle approval have been discussed as well as the current clinical trial and patent landscapes.

Expert opinion: The fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine are evolving at a significant pace with researchers constantly focused on incorporating advanced manufacturing techniques for the development of versatile, complex, and biologically specific platforms. 3D bioprinted microneedles, fabricated using conventional 3D printing techniques, have resultantly provided an alternative to 2D bioscaffolds through the incorporation of biological materials within 3D constructs while providing further mechanical stability, increased bioactive permeation and improved innervation into surrounding tissues. This advancement therefore potentially allows for a more effective biomimetic construct with improved tissue-specific cellular growth for the enhanced treatment of physiological conditions requiring tissue regeneration and replacement.

Introduction: The challenge in tissue engineering lies in replicating the intricate structure of the native extracellular matrix. Recent advancements in AM, notably 3D printing, offer unprecedented capabilities to tailor scaffolds precisely, controlling properties like structure and bioactivity. CAD tools complement this by facilitating design using patient-specific data.

Area’s covered: This review introduces additive manufacturing (AM) and computer-aided design (CAD) as pivotal tools in advancing tissue engineering, particularly cartilage regeneration. This article explores various materials utilized in AM, focusing on polymers and hydrogels for their advantageous properties in tissue engineering applications. Integrating bioactive molecules, including growth factors, into scaffolds to promote tissue regeneration is discussed alongside strategies involving different cell sources, such as stem cells, to enhance tissue development within scaffold matrices.

Expert opinion: Applications of AM and CAD in addressing specific challenges like osteochondral defects and osteoarthritis in cartilage tissue engineering are highlighted. This review consolidates current research findings, offering expert insights into the evolving landscape of AM and CAD technologies in advancing tissue engineering, particularly in cartilage regeneration.

Introduction: Dissolving microneedles (DMN) offer advantages in vaccine delivery, such as enhanced immunogenicity and simplified administration, by targeting immune-rich layers of the skin. However, these benefits require precise and consistent delivery, which poses practical challenges. To address this, specialized applicators are essential for ensuring the accurate deployment of DMNs, making this technology a viable alternative to traditional methods, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where healthcare infrastructure is limited.

Areas covered: In this review, we examine the advancements in DMN-based vaccination and applicator design, focusing on their joint effort. These innovations have improved the precision and efficiency of DMN vaccine delivery. Complex and costly early-stage applicators have evolved into simpler and more cost-effective designs. We highlight these developments in this review, with the latch applicator as a key example of a feature that enhances vaccine delivery.

Expert opinion: Although applicator development has advanced DMN-based vaccination toward practical use, challenges remain. Key areas for further optimization include user friendliness, cost, packaging volume, and wear time. Once optimized, DMN vaccination may become a highly effective and accessible tool for global immunization, supporting efforts to achieve worldwide vaccine equality.

Introduction: Fungal infections, particularly those caused by Candida spp. have increased in recent years. A primary contributor to this surge was the COVID-19 pandemic, where many hospitalized patients had secondary fungal infections. Additionally, the emergence of resistant and multi-resistant fungal strains has become increasingly problematic due to the limited therapeutic options available in antifungal treatments.

Areas covered: This review presents a comprehensive analysis of recent studies focused on the development and characterization of lipid-based nanosystems as an emerging and promising therapeutic alternative. These systems have been evaluated for their potential to deliver antifungal agents specifically targeting resistant Candida spp. strains, offering a controlled and sustained release of drugs.

Expert opinion: Lipid-based nanomaterials are promising tools for the controlled and sustained release of drugs, particularly in treating Candida spp. infections. Although substantial research has been dedicated to development of these nanomaterials, only a few have reached clinical application, such as liposomal amphotericin B, for example. Therefore, it is critical to push forward with advancements to bring these nanomedicines into clinical practice, where they can contribute meaningfully to mitigating the challenge of resistant and lethal fungal strains.

Introduction: Amphotericin B is a polyene antibiotic that is used as an off-label eye drop to treat fungal keratitis. Poor solubility, permeability and high susceptibility to hydrolytic degradation make it challenging to formulate a drug delivery system. Despite its drawbacks, it is a potent antifungal drug against Candida and other fungal species. However, it has not been explored much in ocular drug delivery. Hence, this review brings into focus the potential and increasing significance of Amphotericin B in ocular drug delivery.

Areas covered: In this review, we have systematically summarized the use of Amphotericin B in ocular diseases, the various formulation challenges for Amphotericin B, along with its off-label ocular usage, and stability concerns. The degradation mechanism of Amphotericin B in different conditions was discussed in this article as well.

Expert opinion: In the last few decades, several nanocarriers have been explored to improve the formulation challenges associated with Amphotericin B. Also, due to insufficient clinical studies and unknown toxicity profile, there is no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Amphotericin B formulation for ocular drug delivery. This review aims to offer thorough information about Amphotericin B in ocular drug delivery.

Background: The effectiveness of inhaled medications in asthma and COPD is significantly impacted by inhalation errors. Feedback mechanisms, built into the design of the inhaler might reduce the number of critical errors. This study compares critical errors, preferences, and ease of use of two dry powder inhalers, the Nexthaler, and the Turbuhaler.

Research design and methods: In this multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, cross-over study, the proportions of asthma and COPD patients making critical errors were compared between the Nexthaler and Turbuhaler after 4 weeks of clinical use, after having been trained for the correct use of both inhalers.

Results: Ninety and 49 patients with asthma and COPD, respectively, were assessed. No significant difference was found in the number of critical errors between the two inhalers (3 with Nexthaler and 5 with Turbuhaler). However, more patients preferred the Nexthaler (57.6%) over the Turbuhaler (34.5%) (p = 0.006), while 7.9% stated no preference.

Conclusions: The study found no significant differences in critical error rate between the Nexthaler and Turbuhaler but the Nexthaler was preferred over the Turbuhaler. This study highlights the importance of dedicating sufficient time to instructing patients on the correct inhalation technique, which can lead to long-term retention of the inhalation technique.