首页 > 最新文献

Gait & posture最新文献

英文 中文
Assessing single camera markerless motion capture during upper limb activities of daily living 评估上肢日常生活活动中单摄像头无标记动作捕捉
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.222
Bradley Scott, Edward Chadwick, Mhairi McInnes, Dimitra Blana
In a recent scoping review (Scott et al., 2022) we discussed how single camera markerless motion capture (SCMoCap) may help to facilitate motion analysis in situations where it would otherwise not be possible, such as at-home rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy (Kidziński et al., 2020), and more frequent data collection. However, few studies reported error of measurement in a clinically interpretable manner and there is little evidence assessing SCMoCap during upper limb activities of daily living. Presenting a comprehensive validation of SCMoCap, alongside clinically meaningful evaluation of results would be invaluable for clinicians and future researchers who are interested in implementing upper limb movement analysis into clinical practice (Philp et al., 2021). Are state-of-the-art single camera markerless motion capture methods suitable for measuring joint angles during a typical upper-limb functional assessment? Study participants were instructed to perform a compressive collection of physiological and functional movements that are typically part of an upper limb functional assessment. Movements were repeated 3 times for both the frontal and sagittal planes. Movements were recorded simultaneously with a 10-camera OptiTrack Prime 13 W marker-based motion capture setup (NaturalPoint, USA) and Azure Kinect camera (Microsoft, USA). An eSync2 synchronization device (NaturalPoint, USA) was used to avoid exposure interference between systems. Marker-based bony landmarks and joint centers were collected as recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics (Wu et al., 2005). Marker-based trajectories were processed using MotionMonitor xGen (Innovative Sports Training, USA), where a 20 Hz lowpass Butterworth filter was applied to marker positions. Markerless joint center positions were calculated using Azure Kinect body tracking. Markerless positions were filtered using a 10 Hz lowpass Butterworth filter, then upsampled to 120 Hz matching the OptiTrack recording frequency. Signals were time synchronized using cross correlation. Joint angles were calculated by solving inverse kinematics in OpenSim using Hamner’s model (Hamner, Seth & Delp, 2010). Here we present preliminary results of elbow flexion agreement from one participant during a cup drinking task (see figure1). The agreement between markerless and marker-based methods was evaluated in RStudio using, Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference = -7.49 °, upper limits of agreement 20.87 °, lower limits of agreement -35.85 °); intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.91 °); and root mean squared error (RMSE = 16.30 °). Fig. 1: Elbow flexion angle during a cup drinking taskDownload : Download high-res image (95KB)Download : Download full-size image Our preliminary results suggest good agreement between markerless and marker-based motion capture for elbow flexion while performing a cup drinking task. The Kinect underestimates joint angles at local maxima and minima (see Fig. 1), a
在最近的范围审查(Scott et al., 2022)中,我们讨论了单摄像头无标记运动捕捉(SCMoCap)如何有助于在不可能的情况下促进运动分析,例如脑瘫儿童的家庭康复(Kidziński et al., 2020),以及更频繁的数据收集。然而,很少有研究报告以临床可解释的方式测量误差,并且很少有证据评估SCMoCap在上肢日常生活活动中的作用。对SCMoCap进行全面验证,并对结果进行有临床意义的评估,对于有兴趣将上肢运动分析应用于临床实践的临床医生和未来的研究人员来说,将是非常宝贵的(Philp et al, 2021)。最先进的单摄像头无标记运动捕捉方法是否适合在典型的上肢功能评估中测量关节角度?研究参与者被指示进行生理和功能运动的压缩集合,这是上肢功能评估的典型组成部分。额、矢状面重复运动3次。使用10个摄像头OptiTrack Prime 13w基于标记的动作捕捉装置(NaturalPoint,美国)和Azure Kinect摄像头(Microsoft,美国)同时记录运动。采用eSync2同步设备(NaturalPoint, USA)避免系统间的暴露干扰。根据国际生物力学学会(International Society of Biomechanics)的建议,收集基于标记物的骨骼地标和关节中心(Wu et al., 2005)。基于标记的轨迹使用MotionMonitor xGen (Innovative Sports Training, USA)进行处理,其中20 Hz低通巴特沃斯滤波器应用于标记位置。使用Azure Kinect身体跟踪计算无标记关节中心位置。使用10hz低通巴特沃斯滤波器对无标记位置进行滤波,然后上采样到120hz,与OptiTrack记录频率相匹配。信号使用互相关进行时间同步。利用Hamner的模型(Hamner, Seth & Delp, 2010)在OpenSim中求解逆运动学计算关节角。在这里,我们提出了一个参与者在喝杯任务期间肘关节弯曲协议的初步结果(见图1)。在RStudio中使用Bland-Altman分析评估无标记法和基于标记法的一致性(平均差= -7.49°,一致性上限20.87°,一致性下限-35.85°);类内相关系数(ICC = 0.91°);均方根误差(RMSE = 16.30°)。我们的初步结果表明,无标记和基于标记的动作捕捉在完成一杯饮料任务时肘关节屈曲的效果之间有很好的一致性。Kinect在局部最大值和最小值处低估了关节角度(见图1),平均差值为-7.49°。Azure Kinect身体跟踪返回的标记位置也会受到极端运动的突然变化的影响,这并不代表运动。
{"title":"Assessing single camera markerless motion capture during upper limb activities of daily living","authors":"Bradley Scott, Edward Chadwick, Mhairi McInnes, Dimitra Blana","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.222","url":null,"abstract":"In a recent scoping review (Scott et al., 2022) we discussed how single camera markerless motion capture (SCMoCap) may help to facilitate motion analysis in situations where it would otherwise not be possible, such as at-home rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy (Kidziński et al., 2020), and more frequent data collection. However, few studies reported error of measurement in a clinically interpretable manner and there is little evidence assessing SCMoCap during upper limb activities of daily living. Presenting a comprehensive validation of SCMoCap, alongside clinically meaningful evaluation of results would be invaluable for clinicians and future researchers who are interested in implementing upper limb movement analysis into clinical practice (Philp et al., 2021). Are state-of-the-art single camera markerless motion capture methods suitable for measuring joint angles during a typical upper-limb functional assessment? Study participants were instructed to perform a compressive collection of physiological and functional movements that are typically part of an upper limb functional assessment. Movements were repeated 3 times for both the frontal and sagittal planes. Movements were recorded simultaneously with a 10-camera OptiTrack Prime 13 W marker-based motion capture setup (NaturalPoint, USA) and Azure Kinect camera (Microsoft, USA). An eSync2 synchronization device (NaturalPoint, USA) was used to avoid exposure interference between systems. Marker-based bony landmarks and joint centers were collected as recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics (Wu et al., 2005). Marker-based trajectories were processed using MotionMonitor xGen (Innovative Sports Training, USA), where a 20 Hz lowpass Butterworth filter was applied to marker positions. Markerless joint center positions were calculated using Azure Kinect body tracking. Markerless positions were filtered using a 10 Hz lowpass Butterworth filter, then upsampled to 120 Hz matching the OptiTrack recording frequency. Signals were time synchronized using cross correlation. Joint angles were calculated by solving inverse kinematics in OpenSim using Hamner’s model (Hamner, Seth & Delp, 2010). Here we present preliminary results of elbow flexion agreement from one participant during a cup drinking task (see figure1). The agreement between markerless and marker-based methods was evaluated in RStudio using, Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference = -7.49 °, upper limits of agreement 20.87 °, lower limits of agreement -35.85 °); intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.91 °); and root mean squared error (RMSE = 16.30 °). Fig. 1: Elbow flexion angle during a cup drinking taskDownload : Download high-res image (95KB)Download : Download full-size image Our preliminary results suggest good agreement between markerless and marker-based motion capture for elbow flexion while performing a cup drinking task. The Kinect underestimates joint angles at local maxima and minima (see Fig. 1), a","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analyzing the Impacts of Rectus Femoris Transferring and Botulinum Toxin on Cerebral Palsy: a Case study 股直肌转移及肉毒杆菌毒素对脑瘫的影响分析
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.143
Sadegh Madadi, Mostafa Rostami, Afshin Taheri Azam
Cerebral palsy is a group of different disorders that affect mobility, muscle tone and erectile structure. This condition is usually caused by damage to the brain during growth and development, usually before birth [1]. Houwen et al. [2] evaluated the effect of Botolinum Toxin treatment on the patterns of muscle activation of the rectus femoris and this study showed that BTX-A injection did not improve lower limb muscle activation patterns during walking. Muthusamy et al. [3] examined the effect of rectus femoris surgery on thirty-eight patients with CP and Patients had a significant improvement in postoperative KROM when preoperative KROM was less than 80% normal.Tedroff et al. [4] was studied in 94 children with cerebral palsy who received BoNT-A injection and results showed that BoNT-A could be effective in reducing muscle tone over a longer period of time. "How does the combination of rectus femoris transfer and botulinum toxin affect gait kinematics, range of motion, and muscle activation patterns in patients with cerebral palsy, and how do the effects compare to each treatment alone?" The study involved a motion data of patient with cerebral palsy and a normal child.a simulation model was created using the inverse dynamics method to analyze the joint angles and muscle forces during walking in opensim. The forward dynamic method was then used to simulate the effects of rectus femoris transfer and Botulinum Toxin injection on muscle weakness and surgery.Download : Download high-res image (149KB)Download : Download full-size image using SPSS V.19 software (ANOVA) and output data obtained from modeling. For right hip flexion, the Transferring group is significantly different from the Botolinum toxin group (P<0.001) and can be due to the weakness of the thigh extensor muscles in the Botulinum Toxin group. For right knee flexion, the surgical group is significantly different from the Botolinum Toxin group (P<0.001) and the patient's initial model and it can be concluded that rectus femoris surgery can cause initial relative improvement in the patient and strengthening the extensor knee muscles can help improve the patient's movement. For left hip flexion, the surgical group is significantly different from the Botolinum Toxin group (P<0.001) and can be due to the weakness of the extensor thigh muscles in the Botolinum Toxin group. For left knee flexion,the surgical group is significantly different from Botolinum Toxin group (P<0.001) and the patient's initial model and it can be concluded that rectus femoris Transferring surgery can cause initial relative improvement in the patient The results show that therapeutic interventions including surgery in the first stage are more effective than botulinum toxin and muscle weakness by botulinum toxin injection in the short term may not be effective and require scheduled studies over long periods of time.
脑瘫是一组不同的疾病,影响运动,肌肉张力和勃起结构。这种情况通常是由于大脑在生长发育过程中受到损伤而引起的,通常在出生前[1]。Houwen等[2]评估了肉毒毒素治疗对股直肌肌肉激活模式的影响,该研究表明,注射BTX-A并没有改善行走时下肢肌肉的激活模式。Muthusamy等[3]研究了股直肌手术对38例CP患者的影响,术前KROM低于正常80%的患者术后KROM有明显改善。Tedroff等[4]对94例接受BoNT-A注射的脑瘫患儿进行了研究,结果表明BoNT-A可以在较长时间内有效降低肌张力。“股直肌转移和肉毒杆菌毒素联合治疗如何影响脑瘫患者的步态运动学、活动范围和肌肉激活模式?与单独治疗相比,效果如何?”本研究收集了脑瘫患者和正常儿童的运动数据。采用逆动力学方法建立仿真模型,分析机器人在opensim中行走时的关节角度和肌肉力。采用正向动力学方法模拟股直肌转移和肉毒毒素注射对肌无力和手术的影响。下载:下载高分辨率图像(149KB)下载:使用SPSS V.19软件(ANOVA)下载全尺寸图像,并输出建模后得到的数据。右髋关节屈曲,转移组与肉毒杆菌毒素组有显著差异(P<0.001),可能是由于肉毒杆菌毒素组大腿伸肌无力所致。对于右膝关节屈曲,手术组与肉毒杆菌毒素组和患者初始模型有显著差异(P<0.001),可以得出结论,股直肌手术可以使患者初始相对改善,加强膝关节伸肌可以帮助改善患者的运动。对于左髋关节屈曲,手术组与肉毒杆菌毒素组有显著差异(P<0.001),这可能是由于肉毒杆菌毒素组大腿伸肌无力所致。对于左膝屈曲,手术组与肉毒杆菌毒素组和患者初始模型有显著差异(P<0.001),可以得出结论,股直肌转移手术可以使患者初始相对改善。结果表明,包括手术在内的治疗干预措施在第一阶段比肉毒杆菌毒素更有效,注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗肌肉无力在短期内可能无效,需要定期研究在很长一段时间内。
{"title":"Analyzing the Impacts of Rectus Femoris Transferring and Botulinum Toxin on Cerebral Palsy: a Case study","authors":"Sadegh Madadi, Mostafa Rostami, Afshin Taheri Azam","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.143","url":null,"abstract":"Cerebral palsy is a group of different disorders that affect mobility, muscle tone and erectile structure. This condition is usually caused by damage to the brain during growth and development, usually before birth [1]. Houwen et al. [2] evaluated the effect of Botolinum Toxin treatment on the patterns of muscle activation of the rectus femoris and this study showed that BTX-A injection did not improve lower limb muscle activation patterns during walking. Muthusamy et al. [3] examined the effect of rectus femoris surgery on thirty-eight patients with CP and Patients had a significant improvement in postoperative KROM when preoperative KROM was less than 80% normal.Tedroff et al. [4] was studied in 94 children with cerebral palsy who received BoNT-A injection and results showed that BoNT-A could be effective in reducing muscle tone over a longer period of time. \"How does the combination of rectus femoris transfer and botulinum toxin affect gait kinematics, range of motion, and muscle activation patterns in patients with cerebral palsy, and how do the effects compare to each treatment alone?\" The study involved a motion data of patient with cerebral palsy and a normal child.a simulation model was created using the inverse dynamics method to analyze the joint angles and muscle forces during walking in opensim. The forward dynamic method was then used to simulate the effects of rectus femoris transfer and Botulinum Toxin injection on muscle weakness and surgery.Download : Download high-res image (149KB)Download : Download full-size image using SPSS V.19 software (ANOVA) and output data obtained from modeling. For right hip flexion, the Transferring group is significantly different from the Botolinum toxin group (P<0.001) and can be due to the weakness of the thigh extensor muscles in the Botulinum Toxin group. For right knee flexion, the surgical group is significantly different from the Botolinum Toxin group (P<0.001) and the patient's initial model and it can be concluded that rectus femoris surgery can cause initial relative improvement in the patient and strengthening the extensor knee muscles can help improve the patient's movement. For left hip flexion, the surgical group is significantly different from the Botolinum Toxin group (P<0.001) and can be due to the weakness of the extensor thigh muscles in the Botolinum Toxin group. For left knee flexion,the surgical group is significantly different from Botolinum Toxin group (P<0.001) and the patient's initial model and it can be concluded that rectus femoris Transferring surgery can cause initial relative improvement in the patient The results show that therapeutic interventions including surgery in the first stage are more effective than botulinum toxin and muscle weakness by botulinum toxin injection in the short term may not be effective and require scheduled studies over long periods of time.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gastrocnemius medialis Muscle-tendon unit Properties do not differ between Children with unilateral and bilateral spastic Cerebral Palsy 小儿单侧和双侧痉挛性脑瘫的腓肠肌内侧肌肌腱单位特性无差异
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.133
Annika Kruse, Andreas Habersack, Bernhard Guggenberger, Markus Tilp, Martin Svehlik
{"title":"Gastrocnemius medialis Muscle-tendon unit Properties do not differ between Children with unilateral and bilateral spastic Cerebral Palsy","authors":"Annika Kruse, Andreas Habersack, Bernhard Guggenberger, Markus Tilp, Martin Svehlik","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.133","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of 2 models: Plug in Gait and pyCGM2 1.0 Plug - in步态和pyCGM2 1.0两种模型的比较
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.08.021
Corey Josep, Nicolaos Darras
{"title":"A comparison of 2 models: Plug in Gait and pyCGM2 1.0","authors":"Corey Josep, Nicolaos Darras","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.08.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.08.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of feeling the phantom sensation during gait on spatiotemporal gait characteristics in individuals with transtibial amputation 步态中虚幻感对跨胫截肢患者时空步态特征的影响
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.228
Nimet Sermenli Aydın, İlke Kurt, Halit Selçuk, Sinem Salar, Sezer Ulukaya, Hilal Keklicek
The phantom sensation is a feeling on an amputated limb. The features of the phantom sensation can be variable from person to person. It may accompany the person continuously, be present occasionally or disappear completely. This sensation may be accompanied by pain, in which case it is called phantom pain. Although the effects of phantom pain on many functions are widely known, the effects of phantom sensation on gait was not been adequately clarified yet (1). How does the presence of phantom sensation during gait affect gait characteristics? Three unilateral transtibial amputees and one healthy individual were included in the study. Three questions of the Prosthesis Evaluation questionnaire were asked to amputees to assess the frequency, severity, and degree of discomfort caused by the phantom sensation over the past four weeks. The amputees who had additional health issues and experienced phantom pain or other disturbing phantom sensations were excluded. The gait of individuals was evaluated with a sensor-based gait analysis system (RehaGait-Pro) at the neutral and %5 perturbated treadmill (ReaxRun-Pro). Gait parameters were analyzed and all variables were compared with Perry’s normal expected values (2). The change in gait characteristics of individuals to adapt to the perturbated ground was classified as decrease/increase by taking the gait characteristics on flat ground as a reference, and these changes were evaluated according to their similarity to a healthy individual. Individuals were as follows: Case 1 had phantom sensation during walking, Case 2; had phantom sensation only during resting, Case 3; had no phantom sensation, and Case 4 was a healthy individual. The individual who showed the most similarity with the healthy individual in adaptation to perturbation was the individual who felt phantom sensation during walking (Case 1). Case 1 followed a similar strategy for seven gait parameters. Case 2 gave similar adaptive responses with the healthy individual in 6 gait parameters. The individual without phantom sensation showed adaptive responses similar to the healthy individual in 3 different parameters (Table).Download : Download high-res image (164KB)Download : Download full-size image These results showed that phantom sensation may be a functional sensation and that maintaining the holistic body schema of an amputee may contribute to the nature of gait (1). It is recommended that further research be conducted in large groups. Acknowledgements: This research was funded by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Project number: S219S809).
幻感是一种截肢的感觉。幻感的特征因人而异。它可能一直陪伴着一个人,偶尔出现,或者完全消失。这种感觉可能伴有疼痛,在这种情况下,它被称为幻痛。虽然幻痛对许多功能的影响已广为人知,但幻感对步态的影响尚未得到充分阐明(1)。步态时幻感的存在如何影响步态特征?本研究包括三名单侧跨胫截肢者和一名健康个体。在假肢评估问卷中对截肢者进行了三个问题的评估,以评估过去四周内由幻感引起的不适的频率、严重程度和程度。那些有其他健康问题、经历过幻肢痛或其他令人不安的幻肢感觉的截肢者被排除在外。使用基于传感器的步态分析系统(RehaGait-Pro)在中性和%5摄动跑步机上(ReaxRun-Pro)评估个体的步态。对步态参数进行分析,并将所有变量与Perry正态期望值进行比较(2)。以平地上的步态特征为参考,将个体适应扰动地面的步态特征变化分为减少/增加,并根据其与健康个体的相似度来评估这些变化。个体情况如下:病例1行走时有幻感,病例2行走时有幻感;仅在休息时有幻感,病例3;没有幻感,病例4是健康个体。在适应扰动方面与健康个体表现出最相似的个体是在行走过程中感到幻像的个体(病例1)。病例1在七个步态参数上采用了类似的策略。病例2在6个步态参数中表现出与健康人相似的适应性反应。无幻感个体在3个参数上表现出与健康个体相似的适应性反应(表)。这些结果表明,幻感可能是一种功能性感觉,维持截肢者的整体身体图式可能有助于步态的性质(1)。建议在大群体中进行进一步的研究。致谢:本研究由土耳其科学技术研究委员会资助(项目编号:S219S809)。
{"title":"Effect of feeling the phantom sensation during gait on spatiotemporal gait characteristics in individuals with transtibial amputation","authors":"Nimet Sermenli Aydın, İlke Kurt, Halit Selçuk, Sinem Salar, Sezer Ulukaya, Hilal Keklicek","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.228","url":null,"abstract":"The phantom sensation is a feeling on an amputated limb. The features of the phantom sensation can be variable from person to person. It may accompany the person continuously, be present occasionally or disappear completely. This sensation may be accompanied by pain, in which case it is called phantom pain. Although the effects of phantom pain on many functions are widely known, the effects of phantom sensation on gait was not been adequately clarified yet (1). How does the presence of phantom sensation during gait affect gait characteristics? Three unilateral transtibial amputees and one healthy individual were included in the study. Three questions of the Prosthesis Evaluation questionnaire were asked to amputees to assess the frequency, severity, and degree of discomfort caused by the phantom sensation over the past four weeks. The amputees who had additional health issues and experienced phantom pain or other disturbing phantom sensations were excluded. The gait of individuals was evaluated with a sensor-based gait analysis system (RehaGait-Pro) at the neutral and %5 perturbated treadmill (ReaxRun-Pro). Gait parameters were analyzed and all variables were compared with Perry’s normal expected values (2). The change in gait characteristics of individuals to adapt to the perturbated ground was classified as decrease/increase by taking the gait characteristics on flat ground as a reference, and these changes were evaluated according to their similarity to a healthy individual. Individuals were as follows: Case 1 had phantom sensation during walking, Case 2; had phantom sensation only during resting, Case 3; had no phantom sensation, and Case 4 was a healthy individual. The individual who showed the most similarity with the healthy individual in adaptation to perturbation was the individual who felt phantom sensation during walking (Case 1). Case 1 followed a similar strategy for seven gait parameters. Case 2 gave similar adaptive responses with the healthy individual in 6 gait parameters. The individual without phantom sensation showed adaptive responses similar to the healthy individual in 3 different parameters (Table).Download : Download high-res image (164KB)Download : Download full-size image These results showed that phantom sensation may be a functional sensation and that maintaining the holistic body schema of an amputee may contribute to the nature of gait (1). It is recommended that further research be conducted in large groups. Acknowledgements: This research was funded by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Project number: S219S809).","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Innovative use of 4D scanner for gait analysis of neurological disorders: A case study 创新使用4D扫描仪对神经系统疾病的步态分析:一个案例研究
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.200
Salvador Pitarch-Corresa, Helios De Rosario - Martínez, Juan López - Pascual, Rosa Porcar - Seder, Ana Ruescas - Nicolau, Fermín Basso - Della Vedova
4D scanners (4DSC) are innovative photogrammetry-based 3D/4D capture and analysis systems for anthropometric static and dynamic measurements. Recent research studies have been carried out to demonstrate its validity for kinematic gait assessment [1] and to evaluate the effects of technical marker location on traditional kinematic analysis [2]. Compared to 3D systems, 4DSC allow to capture more detail of human motion, including precise volumes and shapes of body segments that can be used to make more accurate calculations [3]. 4DSC also provides a 3D dynamic avatar reconstruction to visual analysis in 360º vision and information of anthropometric measures in motion. Due to these unique features, 4DSC have set a new direction in motion analysis, especially related with pathological conditions of the nervous system [4]. Can “4D scans” provide significant information related to dynamic soft tissue behavior to improve clinical understanding in neurological disorders gait motion analysis? A case study was conducted with 16-year-old male participant diagnosed of cerebellum ataxia with hypoplasia associated to motor alteration, but able to walk without assistance. Parents’ written consent was obtained. Participant performed consecutive gait repetitions (3 for each limb) at self-selected speed at IBV Human Analysis Laboratory. Tests were recorded with Move4D scanner and Dinascan/IBV force plate. Kinematic and dynamic gait parameters were calculated from the data recorded using AMHPlus/IBV software. Additionally, changes in the calf shape during gait were calculated from the Move4D data using custom developed Python algorithms. Leg calf surface was determined as the posterior area of the mesh at each leg, between tibial tuberosity projection and midpoint of Achilles tendon. At each instant of the gait cycle, the positions of the vertices of those areas were rotated and translated keeping their relative distances, in order to match their positions in the reference posture as closely as possible. Deformation of the skin was measured as the field of 3D distances between the reference points and their displaced positions. That amount of deformation at each instant was quantified for both legs, as the sum of the eigenvectors of that field of deformations (in mm). 4DSC results allowed to objectify gait kinetic and kinematic alterations and a different pattern in soft tissue deformation between legs (see Figure), which were consistent with the clinical impression. Figure. Differences in calf surface deformation and reaction forces between limbs during single leg support. Representation of mesh extracted from Move4D data during gait on top.Download : Download high-res image (105KB)Download : Download full-size image Information extracted from Move4D allows to eliminate remaining limitations of traditional gait motion analysis systems. Recent studies propose methodologies to predict human muscle activity from skin surface behavior [5,6]. Single system solution for
4D扫描仪(4DSC)是创新的基于摄影测量的3D/4D捕获和分析系统,用于人体测量静态和动态测量。最近的研究已经证明了其在运动学步态评估中的有效性[1],并评估了技术标记位置对传统运动学分析的影响[2]。与3D系统相比,4DSC可以捕获更多人体运动的细节,包括精确的身体部分的体积和形状,可以用来进行更精确的计算[3]。4DSC还为360º视觉视觉分析和运动中的人体测量信息提供了三维动态化身重建。由于这些独特的特性,4DSC为运动分析,特别是与神经系统病理状况相关的运动分析开辟了新的方向[4]。“4D扫描”能否提供与动态软组织行为相关的重要信息,以提高对神经系统疾病步态运动分析的临床理解?一个16岁的男性参与者被诊断为小脑共济失调并伴有运动改变的发育不全,但能够在没有帮助的情况下行走。获得家长的书面同意。参与者在IBV人体分析实验室以自己选择的速度连续重复步态(每条肢体重复3次)。使用Move4D扫描仪和Dinascan/IBV测力板记录测试结果。利用AMHPlus/IBV软件记录的数据计算运动学和动态步态参数。此外,使用定制开发的Python算法从Move4D数据中计算步态期间小腿形状的变化。小腿表面被确定为每条腿的补片后部区域,位于胫骨粗隆突起和跟腱中点之间。在步态周期的每个瞬间,这些区域的顶点位置被旋转和平移,保持它们的相对距离,以便尽可能地匹配它们在参考姿态中的位置。皮肤的变形被测量为参考点与其位移位置之间的三维距离场。每个瞬间的变形量被量化为两条腿的变形场的特征向量之和(单位为mm)。4DSC结果使步态动力学和运动学改变以及腿间软组织变形的不同模式客观化(见图),这与临床印象一致。数字单腿支撑时小腿表面变形和四肢间反作用力的差异。步态过程中从Move4D数据中提取的网格表示。下载:下载高分辨率图像(105KB)下载:下载全尺寸图像从Move4D提取的信息允许消除传统步态运动分析系统的剩余局限性。最近的研究提出了从皮肤表面行为预测人体肌肉活动的方法[5,6]。运动学分析和软组织变形的单一系统解决方案可以打开与动态形态变化和肌肉活动相关的未来研究和临床应用。
{"title":"Innovative use of 4D scanner for gait analysis of neurological disorders: A case study","authors":"Salvador Pitarch-Corresa, Helios De Rosario - Martínez, Juan López - Pascual, Rosa Porcar - Seder, Ana Ruescas - Nicolau, Fermín Basso - Della Vedova","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.200","url":null,"abstract":"4D scanners (4DSC) are innovative photogrammetry-based 3D/4D capture and analysis systems for anthropometric static and dynamic measurements. Recent research studies have been carried out to demonstrate its validity for kinematic gait assessment [1] and to evaluate the effects of technical marker location on traditional kinematic analysis [2]. Compared to 3D systems, 4DSC allow to capture more detail of human motion, including precise volumes and shapes of body segments that can be used to make more accurate calculations [3]. 4DSC also provides a 3D dynamic avatar reconstruction to visual analysis in 360º vision and information of anthropometric measures in motion. Due to these unique features, 4DSC have set a new direction in motion analysis, especially related with pathological conditions of the nervous system [4]. Can “4D scans” provide significant information related to dynamic soft tissue behavior to improve clinical understanding in neurological disorders gait motion analysis? A case study was conducted with 16-year-old male participant diagnosed of cerebellum ataxia with hypoplasia associated to motor alteration, but able to walk without assistance. Parents’ written consent was obtained. Participant performed consecutive gait repetitions (3 for each limb) at self-selected speed at IBV Human Analysis Laboratory. Tests were recorded with Move4D scanner and Dinascan/IBV force plate. Kinematic and dynamic gait parameters were calculated from the data recorded using AMHPlus/IBV software. Additionally, changes in the calf shape during gait were calculated from the Move4D data using custom developed Python algorithms. Leg calf surface was determined as the posterior area of the mesh at each leg, between tibial tuberosity projection and midpoint of Achilles tendon. At each instant of the gait cycle, the positions of the vertices of those areas were rotated and translated keeping their relative distances, in order to match their positions in the reference posture as closely as possible. Deformation of the skin was measured as the field of 3D distances between the reference points and their displaced positions. That amount of deformation at each instant was quantified for both legs, as the sum of the eigenvectors of that field of deformations (in mm). 4DSC results allowed to objectify gait kinetic and kinematic alterations and a different pattern in soft tissue deformation between legs (see Figure), which were consistent with the clinical impression. Figure. Differences in calf surface deformation and reaction forces between limbs during single leg support. Representation of mesh extracted from Move4D data during gait on top.Download : Download high-res image (105KB)Download : Download full-size image Information extracted from Move4D allows to eliminate remaining limitations of traditional gait motion analysis systems. Recent studies propose methodologies to predict human muscle activity from skin surface behavior [5,6]. Single system solution for ","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The predictive and functional calibration method in 3D gait analysis using Human Body Model-II produce different 3D joint angles 在基于人体模型- ii的三维步态分析中,预测和功能校准方法会产生不同的三维关节角度
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.227
Rachel Senden, Rik Marcellis, Reinhard Claeys, Kenneth Meijer, Marianne Witlox, Paul Willems
Predictive and functional calibration methods can be used to estimate joint centre and axis localisation in 3D motion analysis (1-6). The method of Harrington and the geometric sphere fit method are implemented in Human Body Model (HBM-II) as they are the most accurate predictive and functional calibration method respectively (1-6). The effect of calibration methods on kinematics is less researched although relevant for clinical interpretations. Does the Harrington predictive and the combined functional knee and hip calibration method in 3D gait analysis produce comparable 3D joint kinematics? Gait of 12 healthy subjects (11 F, mean(SD) age 26.4 (9.3)years, BMI 24.6 (2.8)kg/m2) was measured at Computer Assisted Rehabilitation ENvironment using HBM-II. Subjects started with a 6 minutes familiarisation period. Afterwards, a static model initialization was done (5 s standing in Tpose) using the predictive method of Harrington (1) followed by a measurement of three minutes walking at 1.1 m/s. Next, the system was reset and a combined functional knee (performing knee extension/flexion movements) and hip (performing starARc movement (6)) calibration was done using the geometric sphere fit method (2). A similar gait measurement was done. Data of 3D joint angles were extrapolated to strides (0-100%). For each subject, the difference in joint angle between the methods was calculated for each instant of the gait cycle. Mean differences were calculated and statistical parametric mapping (paired t-test) was used for group comparisons. Although the waveform patterns were comparable for the methods (Fig. 1A), significant differences in amplitude were observed for sagittal hip, knee and ankle angles and transverse hip angle (Fig. 1C), with maximum mean differences ranging from 3.6° to 7.4° (Fig. 1B). Mean differences in sagittal trunk and pelvis angles and frontal plane angles were smaller (range 0.0°–1.1°) and non-significant. The kinematic differences between methods varied among subjects (e.g. maximum knee flexion difference range: 1.9°-12.5°, Fig. 1D). Download : Download high-res image (457KB)Download : Download full-size image 3D gait analysis using the Harrington predictive or combined functional knee and hip calibration method results in different sagittal hip, knee, ankle angles and transverse hip angle. Differences are clinically relevant as they exceed 5°, corresponding to the measurement error for 3D gait kinematics (7). The difference of 1° in other joint angles indicates no critically interfere of the calibration method. The choice for a calibration method should be consistent in a lab and should be based on the context (4, 6). The functional method is more reliable as it is independent on marker placement, but is sensitive for measurement artefacts and quality of movements (6). This reduces repeatability and limits its use in patients having restricted range of motion. The predictive method is sensitive for marker placement and anthropometric mea
预测和功能校准方法可用于估计三维运动分析中的关节中心和轴定位(1-6)。Harrington方法和几何球拟合方法分别是最准确的预测校准方法和功能校准方法,因此在Human Body Model (HBM-II)中实现(1-6)。校准方法对运动学的影响虽然与临床解释相关,但研究较少。在三维步态分析中,哈林顿预测和联合功能膝关节和髋关节校准方法是否产生可比较的三维关节运动学?采用HBM-II在计算机辅助康复环境下测量12名健康受试者(11名F,平均(SD)年龄26.4(9.3)岁,BMI 24.6 (2.8)kg/m2)的步态。受试者开始有6分钟的熟悉期。然后,使用Harrington(1)的预测方法进行静态模型初始化(在Tpose中站立5 s),然后测量以1.1 m/s的速度行走3分钟。接下来,对系统进行复位,并使用几何球体拟合方法(2)对膝关节(进行膝关节伸展/屈曲运动)和髋关节(进行starARc运动)进行联合功能校准。三维关节角度数据外推至步长(0-100%)。对于每个受试者,在步态周期的每个瞬间计算两种方法之间的关节角度差异。计算均数差异,采用统计参数映射(配对t检验)进行组间比较。尽管两种方法的波形模式具有可比性(图1A),但在髋矢状角、膝关节角和踝关节角以及髋横角的振幅上观察到显著差异(图1C),最大平均差异范围为3.6°至7.4°(图1B)。躯干和骨盆矢状角和额平面角的平均差异较小(范围为0.0°-1.1°),无统计学意义。不同方法的运动学差异因受试者而异(例如,最大膝关节屈曲差异范围:1.9°-12.5°,图1D)。下载:下载全尺寸图像3D步态分析,使用哈林顿预测或结合功能的膝关节和髋关节校准方法,得到不同的髋矢状、膝关节、踝关节角度和髋横角。差异超过5°时具有临床相关性,对应于三维步态运动学的测量误差(7)。其他关节角度相差1°表明校准方法没有严重干扰。校准方法的选择应在实验室中保持一致,并应基于环境(4,6)。功能方法更可靠,因为它独立于标记物的放置,但对测量伪像和运动质量敏感(6)。这降低了可重复性,限制了其在运动范围有限的患者中的使用。预测方法对标记位置和人体测量很敏感(8),因此需要经验丰富的操作人员。然而,这种方法对患者来说是实用可行的,因此在荷兰被广泛使用。
{"title":"The predictive and functional calibration method in 3D gait analysis using Human Body Model-II produce different 3D joint angles","authors":"Rachel Senden, Rik Marcellis, Reinhard Claeys, Kenneth Meijer, Marianne Witlox, Paul Willems","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.227","url":null,"abstract":"Predictive and functional calibration methods can be used to estimate joint centre and axis localisation in 3D motion analysis (1-6). The method of Harrington and the geometric sphere fit method are implemented in Human Body Model (HBM-II) as they are the most accurate predictive and functional calibration method respectively (1-6). The effect of calibration methods on kinematics is less researched although relevant for clinical interpretations. Does the Harrington predictive and the combined functional knee and hip calibration method in 3D gait analysis produce comparable 3D joint kinematics? Gait of 12 healthy subjects (11 F, mean(SD) age 26.4 (9.3)years, BMI 24.6 (2.8)kg/m2) was measured at Computer Assisted Rehabilitation ENvironment using HBM-II. Subjects started with a 6 minutes familiarisation period. Afterwards, a static model initialization was done (5 s standing in Tpose) using the predictive method of Harrington (1) followed by a measurement of three minutes walking at 1.1 m/s. Next, the system was reset and a combined functional knee (performing knee extension/flexion movements) and hip (performing starARc movement (6)) calibration was done using the geometric sphere fit method (2). A similar gait measurement was done. Data of 3D joint angles were extrapolated to strides (0-100%). For each subject, the difference in joint angle between the methods was calculated for each instant of the gait cycle. Mean differences were calculated and statistical parametric mapping (paired t-test) was used for group comparisons. Although the waveform patterns were comparable for the methods (Fig. 1A), significant differences in amplitude were observed for sagittal hip, knee and ankle angles and transverse hip angle (Fig. 1C), with maximum mean differences ranging from 3.6° to 7.4° (Fig. 1B). Mean differences in sagittal trunk and pelvis angles and frontal plane angles were smaller (range 0.0°–1.1°) and non-significant. The kinematic differences between methods varied among subjects (e.g. maximum knee flexion difference range: 1.9°-12.5°, Fig. 1D). Download : Download high-res image (457KB)Download : Download full-size image 3D gait analysis using the Harrington predictive or combined functional knee and hip calibration method results in different sagittal hip, knee, ankle angles and transverse hip angle. Differences are clinically relevant as they exceed 5°, corresponding to the measurement error for 3D gait kinematics (7). The difference of 1° in other joint angles indicates no critically interfere of the calibration method. The choice for a calibration method should be consistent in a lab and should be based on the context (4, 6). The functional method is more reliable as it is independent on marker placement, but is sensitive for measurement artefacts and quality of movements (6). This reduces repeatability and limits its use in patients having restricted range of motion. The predictive method is sensitive for marker placement and anthropometric mea","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do gait stability and arm swing affect walking speed during the 6-minute walk test in persons with Multiple Sclerosis? 在多发性硬化症患者的6分钟步行测试中,步态稳定性和手臂摆动是否影响步行速度?
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.153
Pieter Meyns, Kyra Theunissen, Guy Plasqui, Annelies Boonen, Annick Timmermans, Peter Feys, Kenneth Meijer
Fatigue is a major complaint in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) [1]. Previous research identified walking fatigability in pwMS by assessing the change in distance walked between minute 6 and 1 of the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [2]. Further, pwMS show lower limb gait deficits [3], resulting in decreased gait stability compared to healthy controls [4]. Additionally, upper limb movements can be altered in pwMS due to direct MS lesions [5], which have an important role during gait [6]. Therefore, the aim was to assess to what extent change in walking speed in pwMS is associated by changes in gait stability and arm swing from minute 6 to 1 of the 6MWT. Participants were included if they had: MS, age between 18–65, disease severity score from 1 to 5.5 on Expanded Disability Status Scale, ability to walk without walking aids. Participants were excluded if they had: a relapse 3 months, lower limb fracture 12 months, or lower limb botulinum toxin 6 months prior to the study. Participants performed the 6MWT on the CAREN (Motek), equipped with the Human Body lower limb and trunk model, including extra markers for arm swing (acromion and ulnar styloid). Participants walked as fast as possible using self-paced mode. Two familiarization rounds of 3 min, incl. breaks, were provided. Step width and variability of spatiotemporal parameters (i.e. step width, -length & -time) were used to assess gait stability [7]. Arm swing length was calculated as the difference between maximum anterior and posterior hand position. Most affected side was taken into account and defined as the side with greatest motor impairment (i.e. spasticity and/or weakness). Difference scores between minute 6 and 1 of the 6MWT were used for analyses. First, one-tailed Pearson correlations between gait stability measures & arm swing, and walking speed during the 6MWT were tested. Then one-tailed partial correlations were assessed to determine whether gait stability measures influenced walking speed when taking arm swing into account. Finally, significant factors were used in generalized estimation equations (GEE) to determine the extent of their effect on walking speed and possible interactions. Preliminary results included data of 11 pwMS(Table1/T1). Walking speed was significantly related to step length variability, step time variability and arm swing(T1). Partial correlation of step length variability and step time variability remained significant when controlling for arm swing(T1). GEE determined interaction effects between step length variability, step time variability and arm swing on walking speed(T1).Download : Download high-res image (390KB)Download : Download full-size image Results indicate that both gait stability and arm swing are significantly associated to walking speed during 6MWT in pwMS. These outcomes have a separate effect on walking speed as well as an interaction effect. Future studies could investigate whether gait stability and arm swing might be underlying factor
疲劳是多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者的主要主诉[1]。先前的研究通过评估6分钟步行测试(6MWT)中第6分钟至第1分钟步行距离的变化来确定pwMS患者的步行疲劳[2]。此外,与健康对照组相比,pwMS患者表现出下肢步态缺陷[3],导致步态稳定性下降[4]。此外,由于MS的直接病变,pwMS患者的上肢运动可能会发生改变[5],这在步态中起着重要作用[6]。因此,目的是评估在6MWT的第6分钟至第1分钟,pwMS患者步行速度的变化与步态稳定性和手臂摆动的变化在多大程度上相关。如果参与者患有:多发性硬化症,年龄在18-65岁之间,疾病严重程度评分在1到5.5之间,没有助行器的行走能力。如果参与者在研究前3个月复发,下肢骨折12个月或下肢肉毒杆菌毒素6个月,则排除。参与者在CAREN (Motek)上进行了6MWT,配备了人体下肢和躯干模型,包括手臂摆动的额外标记(肩峰和尺茎突)。参与者使用自定节奏模式尽可能快地走路。两轮3分钟的熟悉,包括休息时间。采用步宽和时空参数(即步宽、步长和时间)的变异性来评估步态稳定性[7]。手臂摆动长度计算为最大前、后手位置之差。最受影响的一侧被考虑在内,并被定义为运动损伤最大的一侧(即痉挛和/或无力)。6MWT的第6分钟和第1分钟的差异评分用于分析。首先,对步态稳定性指标、手臂摆动和步行速度之间的单侧Pearson相关性进行了测试。然后评估单尾偏相关性,以确定在考虑手臂摆动时步态稳定性措施是否会影响步行速度。最后,在广义估计方程(GEE)中使用显著因子来确定它们对步行速度的影响程度和可能的相互作用。初步结果包括11例pwMS数据(表1/T1)。步行速度与步长变异性、步时间变异性和手臂摆动(T1)显著相关。当控制手臂摆动(T1)时,步长变异性和步长变异性的部分相关仍然显著。GEE测定步长变异性、步时间变异性和手臂摆动对步行速度(T1)的交互作用效应。结果表明,步态稳定性和手臂摆动与pwMS 6MWT时的步行速度显著相关。这些结果对步行速度有单独的影响,也有相互作用的影响。未来的研究可能会调查步态稳定性和手臂摆动是否可能是导致pwMS患者行走疲劳的潜在因素。
{"title":"Do gait stability and arm swing affect walking speed during the 6-minute walk test in persons with Multiple Sclerosis?","authors":"Pieter Meyns, Kyra Theunissen, Guy Plasqui, Annelies Boonen, Annick Timmermans, Peter Feys, Kenneth Meijer","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.153","url":null,"abstract":"Fatigue is a major complaint in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) [1]. Previous research identified walking fatigability in pwMS by assessing the change in distance walked between minute 6 and 1 of the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [2]. Further, pwMS show lower limb gait deficits [3], resulting in decreased gait stability compared to healthy controls [4]. Additionally, upper limb movements can be altered in pwMS due to direct MS lesions [5], which have an important role during gait [6]. Therefore, the aim was to assess to what extent change in walking speed in pwMS is associated by changes in gait stability and arm swing from minute 6 to 1 of the 6MWT. Participants were included if they had: MS, age between 18–65, disease severity score from 1 to 5.5 on Expanded Disability Status Scale, ability to walk without walking aids. Participants were excluded if they had: a relapse 3 months, lower limb fracture 12 months, or lower limb botulinum toxin 6 months prior to the study. Participants performed the 6MWT on the CAREN (Motek), equipped with the Human Body lower limb and trunk model, including extra markers for arm swing (acromion and ulnar styloid). Participants walked as fast as possible using self-paced mode. Two familiarization rounds of 3 min, incl. breaks, were provided. Step width and variability of spatiotemporal parameters (i.e. step width, -length & -time) were used to assess gait stability [7]. Arm swing length was calculated as the difference between maximum anterior and posterior hand position. Most affected side was taken into account and defined as the side with greatest motor impairment (i.e. spasticity and/or weakness). Difference scores between minute 6 and 1 of the 6MWT were used for analyses. First, one-tailed Pearson correlations between gait stability measures & arm swing, and walking speed during the 6MWT were tested. Then one-tailed partial correlations were assessed to determine whether gait stability measures influenced walking speed when taking arm swing into account. Finally, significant factors were used in generalized estimation equations (GEE) to determine the extent of their effect on walking speed and possible interactions. Preliminary results included data of 11 pwMS(Table1/T1). Walking speed was significantly related to step length variability, step time variability and arm swing(T1). Partial correlation of step length variability and step time variability remained significant when controlling for arm swing(T1). GEE determined interaction effects between step length variability, step time variability and arm swing on walking speed(T1).Download : Download high-res image (390KB)Download : Download full-size image Results indicate that both gait stability and arm swing are significantly associated to walking speed during 6MWT in pwMS. These outcomes have a separate effect on walking speed as well as an interaction effect. Future studies could investigate whether gait stability and arm swing might be underlying factor","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The alignment of the trunk and pelvis during walking in achondroplasia and factors increasing anterior pelvic tilt 软骨发育不全患者行走时躯干和骨盆的排列及增加骨盆前倾的因素
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.245
Antonia Thamm, Sylvie Marx, Nader Sean, Matthias Hösl
Achondroplasia (ACH) is the most common skeletal dysplasia and characterized by shorter long bones relative to the torso. Concerning the upper body, frequent features are cranio-cervical compression, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and stenosis [1,2]. Secondary symptoms can be lower back pain, claudication, weakness and paresthesias. What is the sagittal spinopelvic alignment during gait in ACH and which characteristics affect the pelvic tilt? 34 paediatric and juvenile patients with ACH (age:10.5±4.2 years, height: 108±15 cm) were statistically compared to 27 age-matched typically developing controls (age: 10.8±4.4 years, height: 145±23 cm). All underwent a 3D gait analysis [Vicon Nexus, mod. PiG-Model] to capture upper and lower body kinematics. Thorax, pelvic and lumbar spine rotations were extracted. All subjects were clinically examined for anthropometrics, passive RoM and manual strength. The presence of symptoms was documented. Correlations between clinical parameters, anthropometrics and pelvic tilt were analyzed. 17 of 34 patients reported back pain, sensory deficits or sudden leg weakness. During gait, patients with ACH showed +11.1° more anterior pelvic tilt (P<0.001), -4.0° less anterior thorax tilt (P= 0.005) and - 15.9° more lumbar extension (P<0.001). In both cohorts, subjects who took longer steps, had more pelvic tilt (Fig. 1), yet the tilt was still significantly larger in ACH, irrespective of longer relative steps (P<0.01). In ACH, negative correlations with anterior pelvic tilt were found for popliteal angles (r= -0.40, P=0.018) and for limb length to body height ratio (r=-0.65, P<0.001). Passive hip flexion contracture (Thomas-Test) in ACH was not related to anterior pelvic tilt (r=-0.14, P=0.43). ACH patients with symptoms walked with similarly severe spinopelvic malignment than asymptomatic patients, yet at 11.2% reduced speed (P=0.025). Upon clinical exam, patients with more tilt showed less knee extensor and plantarflexor strength (r=-0.45 and -0.40, both P< 0.027). No such correlations were found in controls.Download : Download high-res image (123KB)Download : Download full-size image Pelvic tilt and hyperlordosis in ACH was pronounced and the rate of symptoms hinting to neurological deficits and spinal compression was 50%. The link of pelvic tilt and reduced knee and ankle extensor strength fits within this considerations. Although anterior pelvic tilt was not a sole compensation to increase step length, it seems to some degree be a consequence of disproportionally short leg length. Notably, after surgical femoral lengthening, sagittal lumbar lordosis has been reported to decrease [3]. Next to leg growth promoting therapeutics and drugs, interventions that increase hamstrings tone in ACH may potentially also be beneficial for the upper body.
软骨发育不全(ACH)是最常见的骨骼发育不良,其特征是相对于躯干较短的长骨。在上半身,常见的特征是颅颈压迫、胸腰椎后凸、腰椎前凸和狭窄[1,2]。继发症状包括腰痛、跛行、虚弱和感觉异常。ACH患者步态中的矢状脊柱-骨盆对齐是什么?哪些特征影响骨盆倾斜?将34例儿童和青少年ACH患者(年龄:10.5±4.2岁,身高:108±15 cm)与27例年龄匹配的典型发展对照组(年龄:10.8±4.4岁,身高:145±23 cm)进行统计学比较。所有人都进行了3D步态分析[Vicon Nexus, mod. PiG-Model],以捕获上半身和下半身的运动学。提取胸腔、骨盆和腰椎旋转。所有受试者都进行了人体测量学、被动关节活动度和手部力量的临床检查。记录了症状的存在。分析临床参数、人体测量学与骨盆倾斜的相关性。34例患者中有17例报告背部疼痛、感觉缺陷或突然腿无力。步态时,ACH患者骨盆前倾增加+11.1°(P<0.001),胸前倾减少-4.0°(P= 0.005),腰椎前伸增加- 15.9°(P<0.001)。在这两个队列中,步数越长,受试者的骨盆倾斜程度越高(图1),但与相对步数越长无关,ACH的骨盆倾斜程度仍明显越大(P<0.01)。在ACH中,腘窝角(r= -0.40, P=0.018)和肢长体高比(r=-0.65, P<0.001)与骨盆前倾呈负相关。ACH患者被动髋屈曲挛缩(Thomas-Test)与骨盆前倾无关(r=-0.14, P=0.43)。与无症状的患者相比,有症状的ACH患者行走时脊柱骨盆恶性肿瘤的严重程度相似,但速度降低了11.2% (P=0.025)。经临床检查,倾斜程度越大的患者膝关节伸肌和跖屈肌强度越低(r=-0.45和-0.40,P均< 0.027)。在对照组中没有发现这种相关性。ACH患者的骨盆倾斜和前凸明显,提示神经功能缺损和脊柱压迫的症状率为50%。骨盆倾斜与膝关节和踝关节伸肌强度降低的联系符合这一考虑。虽然骨盆前倾不是增加步长的唯一补偿,但在某种程度上似乎是不相称的腿长短的结果。值得注意的是,经手术股骨延长术后,矢状腰椎前凸有所减少[3]。除了促进腿部生长的疗法和药物外,增加腿筋张力的干预措施也可能对上半身有益。
{"title":"The alignment of the trunk and pelvis during walking in achondroplasia and factors increasing anterior pelvic tilt","authors":"Antonia Thamm, Sylvie Marx, Nader Sean, Matthias Hösl","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.245","url":null,"abstract":"Achondroplasia (ACH) is the most common skeletal dysplasia and characterized by shorter long bones relative to the torso. Concerning the upper body, frequent features are cranio-cervical compression, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and stenosis [1,2]. Secondary symptoms can be lower back pain, claudication, weakness and paresthesias. What is the sagittal spinopelvic alignment during gait in ACH and which characteristics affect the pelvic tilt? 34 paediatric and juvenile patients with ACH (age:10.5±4.2 years, height: 108±15 cm) were statistically compared to 27 age-matched typically developing controls (age: 10.8±4.4 years, height: 145±23 cm). All underwent a 3D gait analysis [Vicon Nexus, mod. PiG-Model] to capture upper and lower body kinematics. Thorax, pelvic and lumbar spine rotations were extracted. All subjects were clinically examined for anthropometrics, passive RoM and manual strength. The presence of symptoms was documented. Correlations between clinical parameters, anthropometrics and pelvic tilt were analyzed. 17 of 34 patients reported back pain, sensory deficits or sudden leg weakness. During gait, patients with ACH showed +11.1° more anterior pelvic tilt (P<0.001), -4.0° less anterior thorax tilt (P= 0.005) and - 15.9° more lumbar extension (P<0.001). In both cohorts, subjects who took longer steps, had more pelvic tilt (Fig. 1), yet the tilt was still significantly larger in ACH, irrespective of longer relative steps (P<0.01). In ACH, negative correlations with anterior pelvic tilt were found for popliteal angles (r= -0.40, P=0.018) and for limb length to body height ratio (r=-0.65, P<0.001). Passive hip flexion contracture (Thomas-Test) in ACH was not related to anterior pelvic tilt (r=-0.14, P=0.43). ACH patients with symptoms walked with similarly severe spinopelvic malignment than asymptomatic patients, yet at 11.2% reduced speed (P=0.025). Upon clinical exam, patients with more tilt showed less knee extensor and plantarflexor strength (r=-0.45 and -0.40, both P< 0.027). No such correlations were found in controls.Download : Download high-res image (123KB)Download : Download full-size image Pelvic tilt and hyperlordosis in ACH was pronounced and the rate of symptoms hinting to neurological deficits and spinal compression was 50%. The link of pelvic tilt and reduced knee and ankle extensor strength fits within this considerations. Although anterior pelvic tilt was not a sole compensation to increase step length, it seems to some degree be a consequence of disproportionally short leg length. Notably, after surgical femoral lengthening, sagittal lumbar lordosis has been reported to decrease [3]. Next to leg growth promoting therapeutics and drugs, interventions that increase hamstrings tone in ACH may potentially also be beneficial for the upper body.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of minimalist footwear wearing on biomechanical parameters of gait 极简鞋穿对步态生物力学参数的影响
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.166
Lenka Murínová, Miroslav Janura, Tomáš Klein
Minimalist footwear represents a footwear-wearing concept that aims to allow a human to move more naturally compared to conventional shoes [1]. There are several assumptions about the benefits of wearing minimalist footwear on human health [1–3], however, studies dealing with walking in minimalist footwear in adults have mainly evaluated their immediate or short-term effects [4–6]. For a better understanding of their effect on human health longitudinal research is needed.This study investigates the effect of 6 months of wearing minimalist footwear on the biomechanical parameters of gait during barefoot walking. What is the effect of 6 months of minimalist footwear wearing on ground reaction force and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in healthy adults during barefoot walking? The research sample consisted of 50 healthy adults divided into experimental and control groups by randomization. Ground reaction force (GRF) and spatiotemporal characteristics (speed, cadence, step length, stance phase duration) of gait were collected at two measurements during barefoot overground walking at a self-selected speed over a walkway with two embedded force platforms Kistler (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland) synchronized with a kinematic system Vicon Vantage V5 (Vicon Motion System, London, United Kingdom). The intervention period between the two measurements lasted 6 months. During this period, the experimental group wore minimalist footwear in the recommended, progressively increasing volume between the measurements. The minimalist footwear chosen for intervention was footwear Chitra bare (Walk free, s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). Intervention and group effect was detected by repeated measures ANOVA. Slightly, but no significant increase in speed and cadence of the experimental group after the intervention period was found. In other observed spatiotemporal parameters and conditions, no significant differences were found. A significant increase (p = 0.042) in the first peak of mediolateral GRF for the left foot was found in the experimental group after the intervention. No other significant differences in the magnitude of GRF were found. No significant differences were found in peak achievement in all components of GRF relative to the % of the stance phase of gait. Walking in minimalist footwear approximates barefoot walking in selected biomechanical parameters more than walking in conventional shoes [5–8]. Following the results of these studies, we hypothesize that prolonged walking in minimalist footwear may result in changes in gait patterns that should be similar to barefoot walking. The gait of habitually unshod walkers is characterized, e.g., by decreased step length, increased cadence, or decreased magnitude of the first peak vertical GRF compared to habitually shod walkers [9]. These findings are not consistent with ours. One of the possible explanations may be that 6 months of minimalist footwear wearing is a short period to create or produce changes
极简鞋代表了一种穿鞋的概念,旨在让人比传统鞋更自然地移动。关于穿极简鞋对人体健康的好处有几种假设[1-3],然而,关于成年人穿着极简鞋行走的研究主要评估了它们的即时或短期影响[4-6]。为了更好地了解它们对人类健康的影响,需要进行纵向研究。本研究调查了6个月穿着极简鞋对赤脚行走时步态生物力学参数的影响。6个月的极简鞋穿着对健康成人赤脚行走时地面反作用力和步态时空参数的影响是什么?研究样本由50名健康成年人组成,随机分为实验组和对照组。采用两个内置力平台Kistler(瑞士,Winterthur, Kistler)和运动系统Vicon Vantage V5 (Vicon Motion system,伦敦,英国),以自选速度在人行道上赤脚行走时,两次测量步态的地面反作用力(GRF)和时空特征(速度、节奏、步长、站立相位持续时间)。两次测量之间的干预期为6个月。在此期间,实验组穿着推荐的极简鞋,在两次测量之间逐渐增加体积。为干预选择的极简主义鞋类是Chitra bare (Walk free, s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic)。采用重复测量方差分析检测干预和组效应。实验组的速度和节奏在干预期后略有增加,但没有明显增加。在其他观测的时空参数和条件下,没有发现显著差异。干预后实验组左足中外侧GRF第一峰明显增高(p = 0.042)。在GRF的大小方面没有发现其他显著差异。相对于步态的站立阶段的百分比,在所有GRF成分的峰值成就方面没有发现显着差异。在选定的生物力学参数中,穿着极简鞋行走比穿着传统鞋行走更接近赤脚行走[5-8]。根据这些研究的结果,我们假设长时间穿着极简鞋走路可能会导致步态模式的变化,这种变化应该与赤脚走路相似。与习惯穿鞋的步行者相比,习惯性不穿鞋步行者的步态特征表现为步长减小,步频增加,或第一个垂直GRF峰值的幅度减小。这些发现与我们的不一致。一种可能的解释是,6个月的极简鞋穿是一个短时间内创造或产生步行模式的变化,所选择的生物力学参数的变化将反映出来。
{"title":"The effect of minimalist footwear wearing on biomechanical parameters of gait","authors":"Lenka Murínová, Miroslav Janura, Tomáš Klein","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.166","url":null,"abstract":"Minimalist footwear represents a footwear-wearing concept that aims to allow a human to move more naturally compared to conventional shoes [1]. There are several assumptions about the benefits of wearing minimalist footwear on human health [1–3], however, studies dealing with walking in minimalist footwear in adults have mainly evaluated their immediate or short-term effects [4–6]. For a better understanding of their effect on human health longitudinal research is needed.This study investigates the effect of 6 months of wearing minimalist footwear on the biomechanical parameters of gait during barefoot walking. What is the effect of 6 months of minimalist footwear wearing on ground reaction force and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in healthy adults during barefoot walking? The research sample consisted of 50 healthy adults divided into experimental and control groups by randomization. Ground reaction force (GRF) and spatiotemporal characteristics (speed, cadence, step length, stance phase duration) of gait were collected at two measurements during barefoot overground walking at a self-selected speed over a walkway with two embedded force platforms Kistler (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland) synchronized with a kinematic system Vicon Vantage V5 (Vicon Motion System, London, United Kingdom). The intervention period between the two measurements lasted 6 months. During this period, the experimental group wore minimalist footwear in the recommended, progressively increasing volume between the measurements. The minimalist footwear chosen for intervention was footwear Chitra bare (Walk free, s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). Intervention and group effect was detected by repeated measures ANOVA. Slightly, but no significant increase in speed and cadence of the experimental group after the intervention period was found. In other observed spatiotemporal parameters and conditions, no significant differences were found. A significant increase (p = 0.042) in the first peak of mediolateral GRF for the left foot was found in the experimental group after the intervention. No other significant differences in the magnitude of GRF were found. No significant differences were found in peak achievement in all components of GRF relative to the % of the stance phase of gait. Walking in minimalist footwear approximates barefoot walking in selected biomechanical parameters more than walking in conventional shoes [5–8]. Following the results of these studies, we hypothesize that prolonged walking in minimalist footwear may result in changes in gait patterns that should be similar to barefoot walking. The gait of habitually unshod walkers is characterized, e.g., by decreased step length, increased cadence, or decreased magnitude of the first peak vertical GRF compared to habitually shod walkers [9]. These findings are not consistent with ours. One of the possible explanations may be that 6 months of minimalist footwear wearing is a short period to create or produce changes","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135298545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Gait & posture
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1