Pub Date : 2025-10-08eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf194
Jayani Jayawardhana, Jialin Hou
Introduction: Cannabis use in the United States is increasing. However, the prevalence and trends in cannabis use disorder (CUD) and cannabis poisoning among Medicaid enrollees, a vulnerable population, are not evident.
Methods: Using the Merative MarketScan Multistate Medicaid Claims and Encounters Database from 2011-2022, we examined adjusted prevalence and trends in CUD and cannabis poisoning among Medicaid enrollees and by age, sex, and insurance type (managed care [MC]/fee-for-service [FFS]).
Results: During the 2011 quarter (Q) 1-2022 Q4, the CUD rate increased from 336.54 to 548.96 per 100 000 enrollees per quarter-a 1.63-fold increase; the cannabis poisoning rate increased from 1.45 to 7.04 per 100 000 enrollees per quarter-a 4.86-fold increase. CUD rates were highest among those aged 18-34 years, while cannabis poisoning rates among those aged 0-17 years surpassed the rate of those aged 18-34 years by 2020 Q3. CUD and cannabis poisoning rates increased among both males and females and among those with FFS and MC, although females and MC enrollees experienced higher increases than males and FFS enrollees, respectively.
Conclusion: CUD and cannabis poisoning rates among Medicaid enrollees increased significantly during 2011-2022, especially among older adults, females, and MC enrollees. Targeted education campaigns on safe use and storage of cannabis may help reduce increasing trends in CUD and cannabis poisonings.
{"title":"Prevalence and trends in cannabis use disorder and cannabis poisoning among Medicaid enrollees: a multistate analysis, 2011-2022.","authors":"Jayani Jayawardhana, Jialin Hou","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf194","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cannabis use in the United States is increasing. However, the prevalence and trends in cannabis use disorder (CUD) and cannabis poisoning among Medicaid enrollees, a vulnerable population, are not evident.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Merative MarketScan Multistate Medicaid Claims and Encounters Database from 2011-2022, we examined adjusted prevalence and trends in CUD and cannabis poisoning among Medicaid enrollees and by age, sex, and insurance type (managed care [MC]/fee-for-service [FFS]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 2011 quarter (Q) 1-2022 Q4, the CUD rate increased from 336.54 to 548.96 per 100 000 enrollees per quarter-a 1.63-fold increase; the cannabis poisoning rate increased from 1.45 to 7.04 per 100 000 enrollees per quarter-a 4.86-fold increase. CUD rates were highest among those aged 18-34 years, while cannabis poisoning rates among those aged 0-17 years surpassed the rate of those aged 18-34 years by 2020 Q3. CUD and cannabis poisoning rates increased among both males and females and among those with FFS and MC, although females and MC enrollees experienced higher increases than males and FFS enrollees, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CUD and cannabis poisoning rates among Medicaid enrollees increased significantly during 2011-2022, especially among older adults, females, and MC enrollees. Targeted education campaigns on safe use and storage of cannabis may help reduce increasing trends in CUD and cannabis poisonings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12548733/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145373549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-07eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf191
Howard Bauchner, Frederick P Rivara
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently released a document titled "Leading in Gold Standard Science-An NIH Implementation Plan." We offer reflections on 4 of the 9 "tenets" of gold standard research and recommendations for improving scholarly publication.
{"title":"Gold standard research-reflections on the NIH announcement.","authors":"Howard Bauchner, Frederick P Rivara","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf191","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently released a document titled \"Leading in Gold Standard Science-An NIH Implementation Plan.\" We offer reflections on 4 of the 9 \"tenets\" of gold standard research and recommendations for improving scholarly publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12555001/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145395966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-03eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf182
Sarah K Emond, Daniel A Ollendorf
The FDA Commissioner's new National Priority Voucher program seeks to accelerate drug approvals for products meeting certain criteria. Interestingly, the program intends to increase affordability of new drugs. With few specifics available as to how the program will achieve that goal, this paper proposes a framework for leveraging independent value assessments to achieve affordable access while incentivizing evidence development and innovation.
{"title":"How to make one line in the FDA Commissioner's new drug review program into a force for affordable access for patients.","authors":"Sarah K Emond, Daniel A Ollendorf","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf182","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The FDA Commissioner's new National Priority Voucher program seeks to accelerate drug approvals for products meeting certain criteria. Interestingly, the program intends to increase affordability of new drugs. With few specifics available as to how the program will achieve that goal, this paper proposes a framework for leveraging independent value assessments to achieve affordable access while incentivizing evidence development and innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492479/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on the American Medical Association's Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) to estimate the physician work and direct practice expense associated with the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). However, as CMS notes in the 2026 MPFS proposed rule, the RUC's processes, which rely heavily on surveys and expert panels of physicians who are members of specialty societies, create conflicts of interest and overvalue specialty services. Although CMS and the RUC regularly assess MPFS codes for misvaluation, significant distortions remain, in part because the RUC develops new values by simply repeating the survey and expert panel processes that created the misvaluation in the first place. To correct this longstanding program, CMS should implement a technical expert panel to provide unbiased recommendations on the fee schedule, and Congress should require CMS to validate work and direct practice expense values using alternative, empirical data sources.
{"title":"Why the Medicare physician fee schedule misvalues fee levels and how to fix it.","authors":"Laura Skopec, Robert A Berenson","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf189","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on the American Medical Association's Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) to estimate the physician work and direct practice expense associated with the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). However, as CMS notes in the 2026 MPFS proposed rule, the RUC's processes, which rely heavily on surveys and expert panels of physicians who are members of specialty societies, create conflicts of interest and overvalue specialty services. Although CMS and the RUC regularly assess MPFS codes for misvaluation, significant distortions remain, in part because the RUC develops new values by simply repeating the survey and expert panel processes that created the misvaluation in the first place. To correct this longstanding program, CMS should implement a technical expert panel to provide unbiased recommendations on the fee schedule, and Congress should require CMS to validate work and direct practice expense values using alternative, empirical data sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12508800/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145282427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf187
Natalia Sifnugel, Molly Moore Jeffery, Elyssa F L Grogan, Rohit B Sangal, Brendan M Carr, Daniel S Cruz, Scott Dresden, Cameron J Gettel, Mark Iscoe, Rachel M Skains, Arjun Venkatesh, Ula Hwang
Introduction: The rapidly ageing population and multimorbidity are associated with increased emergency department (ED) visits by older adults. In the ED, older adults have higher risk of hospitalization, functional and cognitive decline, and mortality. Boarding, holding admitted patients in the ED awaiting a hospital bed, exacerbates these negative outcomes, which disproportionately affect older adults.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to investigate US boarding trends by age using clinical administrative data from 5 health systems and publicly available NHAMCS data from 2018 to 2024.
Results: Boarding ≥3 h in the ED has increased across diverse hospital types, with oldest adults (85+) facing the greatest risk (System 4: IRR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.15-1.20], System 5: IRR [95% CI] = 1.20 [1.17-1.23], System 3 [Community Hospital]: IRR [95% CI] = 1.25 [1.19-1.33]). These results were recapitulated at the national level in NHAMCS (IRR [95% CI] = 1.30 [1.05-1.61]).
Discussion: The trend of increased boarding has serious implications for patients, caregivers, and health systems. The 2025 CMS Age-Friendly Hospital Measure offers opportunities to improve processes and procedures to mitigate the negative effects of hospital boarding on older patients. We highlight opportunities to address this challenge, including ongoing quality improvement initiatives, bed prioritization algorithms, and alternate admission pathways.
{"title":"Stranded in the emergency department: an analysis of boarding trends in older adults in the United States.","authors":"Natalia Sifnugel, Molly Moore Jeffery, Elyssa F L Grogan, Rohit B Sangal, Brendan M Carr, Daniel S Cruz, Scott Dresden, Cameron J Gettel, Mark Iscoe, Rachel M Skains, Arjun Venkatesh, Ula Hwang","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf187","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapidly ageing population and multimorbidity are associated with increased emergency department (ED) visits by older adults. In the ED, older adults have higher risk of hospitalization, functional and cognitive decline, and mortality. Boarding, holding admitted patients in the ED awaiting a hospital bed, exacerbates these negative outcomes, which disproportionately affect older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to investigate US boarding trends by age using clinical administrative data from 5 health systems and publicly available NHAMCS data from 2018 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Boarding ≥3 h in the ED has increased across diverse hospital types, with oldest adults (85+) facing the greatest risk (System 4: IRR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.15-1.20], System 5: IRR [95% CI] = 1.20 [1.17-1.23], System 3 [Community Hospital]: IRR [95% CI] = 1.25 [1.19-1.33]). These results were recapitulated at the national level in NHAMCS (IRR [95% CI] = 1.30 [1.05-1.61]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The trend of increased boarding has serious implications for patients, caregivers, and health systems. The 2025 CMS Age-Friendly Hospital Measure offers opportunities to improve processes and procedures to mitigate the negative effects of hospital boarding on older patients. We highlight opportunities to address this challenge, including ongoing quality improvement initiatives, bed prioritization algorithms, and alternate admission pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12548728/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145380502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf190
Donglan Zhang, Jun Soo Lee, Elena V Kuklina, Lisa M Pollack, Sandra L Jackson, Nicole L Therrien, Kai Hong, Xiaobei Dong, Anand Rajan, Wendy L Kinzler, Milla Arabadjian, Vivian Hsing-Chun Wang, Feijun Luo
Introduction: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, including chronic and pregnancy-induced hypertension, pose significant risks to maternal health. This study evaluated the association of New York State (NYS)'s Paid Family Leave (PFL) law, implemented in 2018, with postpartum healthcare utilization among women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
Methods: Using commercial claims data (2017-2022) for 312 470 employed women aged 15-45 years with live births, we assessed postpartum outpatient visits, hospital admissions, and medication adherence.
Results: The PFL law was associated with a 3.7%-point increase in outpatient visits within 7 days postpartum for women with chronic hypertension (from 25.9% to 29.6% in NYS, P < 0.001) and an 8.6%-point increase for women with pregnancy-induced hypertension (from 26.3% to 35.0%) in NYS, P < 0.001). The PFL law was associated with a 1.5%-point reduction in inpatient admissions for women with chronic hypertension (from 3.6% to 2.1% in NYS, P < 0.001), and a 7.1%-point improvement in antihypertensive medication adherence for women with chronic hypertension (from 26.6% to 33.8% in NYS, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Study findings suggest that PFL laws may enhance postpartum hypertension management, providing useful insights for policymakers aiming to improve maternal health outcomes through workplace policies.
{"title":"New York state's paid family leave improved postpartum health care among women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.","authors":"Donglan Zhang, Jun Soo Lee, Elena V Kuklina, Lisa M Pollack, Sandra L Jackson, Nicole L Therrien, Kai Hong, Xiaobei Dong, Anand Rajan, Wendy L Kinzler, Milla Arabadjian, Vivian Hsing-Chun Wang, Feijun Luo","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf190","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, including chronic and pregnancy-induced hypertension, pose significant risks to maternal health. This study evaluated the association of New York State (NYS)'s Paid Family Leave (PFL) law, implemented in 2018, with postpartum healthcare utilization among women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using commercial claims data (2017-2022) for 312 470 employed women aged 15-45 years with live births, we assessed postpartum outpatient visits, hospital admissions, and medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PFL law was associated with a 3.7%-point increase in outpatient visits within 7 days postpartum for women with chronic hypertension (from 25.9% to 29.6% in NYS, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and an 8.6%-point increase for women with pregnancy-induced hypertension (from 26.3% to 35.0%) in NYS, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The PFL law was associated with a 1.5%-point reduction in inpatient admissions for women with chronic hypertension (from 3.6% to 2.1% in NYS, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and a 7.1%-point improvement in antihypertensive medication adherence for women with chronic hypertension (from 26.6% to 33.8% in NYS, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings suggest that PFL laws may enhance postpartum hypertension management, providing useful insights for policymakers aiming to improve maternal health outcomes through workplace policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12573253/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145433605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-23eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf167
Ravi B Parikh, Kristin A Linn, Junning Liang, Sae-Hwan Park, Torrey Shirk, Deborah S Cousins, Caleb Hearn, Matthew Maciejewski, Amol S Navathe
Risk adjustment is used in healthcare payment to mitigate the payer incentive to select for healthier populations and to improve fairness of quality assessment. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has used a spending-based metric, the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) score, to determine risk. However, the HCC score is potentially confounded by access and utilization differences, which are related to income and rurality. In this study, we investigate how related HCC scores are to mortality, a more objective indicator of clinical risk state, and whether that relationship differs between rural and urban populations. We examined calibration of the HCC spending model by calculating the predicted-to-observed spending ratio within deciles of the HCC score. We then compared urban and rural beneficiaries' clinical risk by comparing observed mortality rates within deciles. Our results demonstrate that the HCC model underpredicts mortality, while overpredicting spending, for rural beneficiaries. In contrast, it is well-calibrated for urban beneficiaries. These findings suggest that risk models based on HCCs may systematically disadvantage rural beneficiaries because HCC-based risk-adjusted spending may not fully account for baseline clinical risk.
{"title":"Unfairness toward rural beneficiaries in Medicare's hierarchical conditions categories score.","authors":"Ravi B Parikh, Kristin A Linn, Junning Liang, Sae-Hwan Park, Torrey Shirk, Deborah S Cousins, Caleb Hearn, Matthew Maciejewski, Amol S Navathe","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf167","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk adjustment is used in healthcare payment to mitigate the payer incentive to select for healthier populations and to improve fairness of quality assessment. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has used a spending-based metric, the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) score, to determine risk. However, the HCC score is potentially confounded by access and utilization differences, which are related to income and rurality. In this study, we investigate how related HCC scores are to mortality, a more objective indicator of clinical risk state, and whether that relationship differs between rural and urban populations. We examined calibration of the HCC spending model by calculating the predicted-to-observed spending ratio within deciles of the HCC score. We then compared urban and rural beneficiaries' clinical risk by comparing observed mortality rates within deciles. Our results demonstrate that the HCC model underpredicts mortality, while overpredicting spending, for rural beneficiaries. In contrast, it is well-calibrated for urban beneficiaries. These findings suggest that risk models based on HCCs may systematically disadvantage rural beneficiaries because HCC-based risk-adjusted spending may not fully account for baseline clinical risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456169/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-22eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf185
Amber D Thompson, Megan C Thomas Hebdon, Rebecca L Utz, Sara E Hart, Lee Ellington, Erin D Bouldin
Introduction: Family caregiving is receiving increased attention in state and national policy, while caregivers face constrictions in workplace flexibility.
Methods: A survey of employed caregivers in Utah (n = 226) was used to assess how often they reported having trouble managing paid work and caregiving responsibilities, the challenges they encountered in finding balance between roles, and effective strategies for caregivers to manage both roles.
Results: Almost half (44%) experienced moderate to severe difficulties balancing paid work and caregiving. Based on open-ended responses, time burden was the most commonly difficult aspect of balancing. Caregivers who had difficulty managing caregiving and work were twice as likely to have made employment changes, including hybrid/remote work or reducing hours. Caregivers said flexibility in work schedule and help with caregiving from family and friends were important to helping them achieving balance.
Conclusion: Difficulties balancing caregiving with paid employment are common and span health, financial, and time challenges. Policies supporting caregivers in their dual roles should address the common difficulties that caregivers experience. These policies could benefit employers, workers, and people with chronic health conditions and disability.
{"title":"Caregivers at the crossroads: shifting policies and the challenges faced by employed caregivers.","authors":"Amber D Thompson, Megan C Thomas Hebdon, Rebecca L Utz, Sara E Hart, Lee Ellington, Erin D Bouldin","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf185","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family caregiving is receiving increased attention in state and national policy, while caregivers face constrictions in workplace flexibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of employed caregivers in Utah (<i>n</i> = 226) was used to assess how often they reported having trouble managing paid work and caregiving responsibilities, the challenges they encountered in finding balance between roles, and effective strategies for caregivers to manage both roles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half (44%) experienced moderate to severe difficulties balancing paid work and caregiving. Based on open-ended responses, time burden was the most commonly difficult aspect of balancing. Caregivers who had difficulty managing caregiving and work were twice as likely to have made employment changes, including hybrid/remote work or reducing hours. Caregivers said flexibility in work schedule and help with caregiving from family and friends were important to helping them achieving balance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Difficulties balancing caregiving with paid employment are common and span health, financial, and time challenges. Policies supporting caregivers in their dual roles should address the common difficulties that caregivers experience. These policies could benefit employers, workers, and people with chronic health conditions and disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12508802/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145282421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-19eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf177
Changchuan Jiang, Lesi He, Chuan Angel Lu, Arthur S Hong, Xin Hu, Joseph H Joo, Ryan D Nipp, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, K Robin Yabroff, Joshua M Liao
Introduction: Zero-premium Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are increasingly popular, yet knowledge gaps exist regarding their distribution, enrollment, and quality, particularly in areas with greater socioeconomic vulnerability and clinical need.
Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional study of publicly available CMS data from 2019-2024, analyzing 2472 US counties. Annual plan counts and enrollment rates were examined, stratified by county-level socioeconomic and health characteristics (racial/ethnic minority percentage, poverty rate, and prevalence of fair/poor health). Counties were categorized into quartiles for comparison.
Results: Zero-premium MA plans expanded substantially from 2019-2024, rising from 46.02% of MA plans (9.12 million enrollees) to 66.3% (18.76 million). These plans were more likely to feature restrictive provider networks and showed disproportionate enrollment growth in counties with greater socioeconomic and health needs (higher proportions of racial/ethnic minority residents, poverty, and poor health status; P < 0.001). Across all county-characteristic subgroups, zero-premium plans consistently had lower star ratings (1-3.5).
Conclusion: Rapid zero-premium MA plan adoption raises concerns about the quality of care, especially among vulnerable populations. Further examination of plan quality standards and patient outcomes, transparency of enrollment incentives (eg, insurance broker commissions), and enrollee navigation and decision-making about plan options is warranted.
{"title":"Zero-premium Medicare Advantage plans: trends in areas with socioeconomic vulnerability and health needs.","authors":"Changchuan Jiang, Lesi He, Chuan Angel Lu, Arthur S Hong, Xin Hu, Joseph H Joo, Ryan D Nipp, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, K Robin Yabroff, Joshua M Liao","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf177","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Zero-premium Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are increasingly popular, yet knowledge gaps exist regarding their distribution, enrollment, and quality, particularly in areas with greater socioeconomic vulnerability and clinical need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a serial cross-sectional study of publicly available CMS data from 2019-2024, analyzing 2472 US counties. Annual plan counts and enrollment rates were examined, stratified by county-level socioeconomic and health characteristics (racial/ethnic minority percentage, poverty rate, and prevalence of fair/poor health). Counties were categorized into quartiles for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zero-premium MA plans expanded substantially from 2019-2024, rising from 46.02% of MA plans (9.12 million enrollees) to 66.3% (18.76 million). These plans were more likely to feature restrictive provider networks and showed disproportionate enrollment growth in counties with greater socioeconomic and health needs (higher proportions of racial/ethnic minority residents, poverty, and poor health status; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Across all county-characteristic subgroups, zero-premium plans consistently had lower star ratings (1-3.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid zero-premium MA plan adoption raises concerns about the quality of care, especially among vulnerable populations. Further examination of plan quality standards and patient outcomes, transparency of enrollment incentives (eg, insurance broker commissions), and enrollee navigation and decision-making about plan options is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449130/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-17eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf184
Julia Adler-Milstein, Sarah W Rosenthal, Robert Thombley, Stephanie Rogers, Benjamin Rosner, Jarmin Yeh, James D Harrison
In 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) added a novel Age-Friendly Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Measure, composed of 10 attestation statements in 5 domains. The measure is designed to improve care for older adults through promoting care processes and structural capabilities drawn from evidence-based standards included in the 4Ms Framework (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) and operationalized in 3 programs: Geriatric Surgery Verification, Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Age-Friendly Health System recognition. We highlight synergies and gaps between these programs and the CMS Age-Friendly IQR measure to guide hospital efforts as they prepare for their first attestation in 2026. In addition, we make recommendations to CMS to improve measure validity through better specifications that ensure meaningful impact on care for older adults and to reduce associated reporting burden. Notably, there is little overlap in the outcome measures incorporated into each program. Attending to these considerations is critical to maximize the potential of this new national quality measure to address persistent shortcomings in evidence-based care for older adults.
{"title":"From 4Ms to 5 domains: ensuring new CMS Age-Friendly hospital measure improves care for older adults.","authors":"Julia Adler-Milstein, Sarah W Rosenthal, Robert Thombley, Stephanie Rogers, Benjamin Rosner, Jarmin Yeh, James D Harrison","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf184","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf184","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) added a novel Age-Friendly Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Measure, composed of 10 attestation statements in 5 domains. The measure is designed to improve care for older adults through promoting care processes and structural capabilities drawn from evidence-based standards included in the 4Ms Framework (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) and operationalized in 3 programs: Geriatric Surgery Verification, Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Age-Friendly Health System recognition. We highlight synergies and gaps between these programs and the CMS Age-Friendly IQR measure to guide hospital efforts as they prepare for their first attestation in 2026. In addition, we make recommendations to CMS to improve measure validity through better specifications that ensure meaningful impact on care for older adults and to reduce associated reporting burden. Notably, there is little overlap in the outcome measures incorporated into each program. Attending to these considerations is critical to maximize the potential of this new national quality measure to address persistent shortcomings in evidence-based care for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12508804/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145282462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}