Jeffrey Lutmer, Emily Bucholz, Katherine A Auger, Matt Hall, J Mitchell Harris, Ashley Jenkins, Rustin Morse, Mark I Neuman, Alon Peltz, Harold K Simon, Ronald J Teufel
Background: There is a paucity of information around whether hospital length of stay and readmission rates differ based upon hospital type for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with complex chronic diseases (CCDs).
Objective: To measure the association between hospital type and readmission rates and index admission LOS among AYA with CCDs.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, including patients 12-25 years old with cystic fibrosis (CF), sickle cell disease (SCD), spina bifida (SB), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Index hospitalizations were categorized by hospital type (pediatric hospitals [PHs], adult hospitals with pediatric services [AHPSs], and adult hospitals without pediatric services [AHs]), CCD, and age group. We compared case-mix adjusted 30-day readmission rates and differences in index admission LOS between hospital types.
Results: Adult hospitals without pediatric services exhibited higher readmission rates (25.4%) than AHPS (22.9%) and PH (15.1%). Compared to patients with CF admitted to AH, lower readmission rates were associated with longer LOS at both AHPS (relative ratio [RR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.55) and PH (RR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.28-1.97). Patients with DM admitted to AHPS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91) and PH (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71) also demonstrated lower readmission rates than those admitted to AH.
Conclusions: For AYA with CCD, hospital type is associated with differences in readmission rates and LOS. Lower readmission rates at hospitals with pediatric services compared to adult hospitals without pediatric services suggest hospital type has a significant impact on outcomes.
背景:关于患有复杂慢性病(CCD)的青少年和年轻成人(AYA)的住院时间和再入院率是否因医院类型而异的信息很少:关于患有复杂慢性病(CCD)的青少年和年轻成人(AYA)的住院时间和再入院率是否因医院类型而异的信息很少:测量患有复杂慢性病的青少年和年轻成人的医院类型与再入院率和指标入院时间之间的关联:我们对2017年医疗成本与利用项目州住院患者数据库进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,其中包括12-25岁患有囊性纤维化(CF)、镰状细胞病(SCD)、脊柱裂(SB)、炎症性肠病(IBD)和糖尿病(DM)的患者。指数住院按医院类型(儿科医院[PHs]、提供儿科服务的成人医院[AHPSs]和不提供儿科服务的成人医院[AHs])、CCD 和年龄组进行分类。我们比较了不同类型医院的病例组合调整后 30 天再入院率和指标入院 LOS 的差异:没有儿科服务的成人医院的再入院率(25.4%)高于AHPS(22.9%)和PH(15.1%)。与入住AH的CF患者相比,入住AHPS(相对比[RR]:1.25,95%置信区间[CI]:1.02-1.55)和PH(RR:1.59,95%置信区间[CI]:1.28-1.97)的再入院率较低,但住院时间较长。入住AHPS(几率比[OR]:0.75,95% CI:0.62-0.91)和PH(OR:0.47,95% CI:0.31-0.71)的DM患者的再入院率也低于入住AH的患者:结论:对于患有慢性阻塞性肺病的亚健康患者而言,医院类型与再入院率和住院时间的差异有关。与不提供儿科服务的成人医院相比,提供儿科服务的医院再入院率更低,这表明医院类型对治疗效果有显著影响。
{"title":"Association between hospital type and length of stay and readmissions for young adults with complex chronic diseases.","authors":"Jeffrey Lutmer, Emily Bucholz, Katherine A Auger, Matt Hall, J Mitchell Harris, Ashley Jenkins, Rustin Morse, Mark I Neuman, Alon Peltz, Harold K Simon, Ronald J Teufel","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13524","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of information around whether hospital length of stay and readmission rates differ based upon hospital type for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with complex chronic diseases (CCDs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the association between hospital type and readmission rates and index admission LOS among AYA with CCDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, including patients 12-25 years old with cystic fibrosis (CF), sickle cell disease (SCD), spina bifida (SB), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Index hospitalizations were categorized by hospital type (pediatric hospitals [PHs], adult hospitals with pediatric services [AHPSs], and adult hospitals without pediatric services [AHs]), CCD, and age group. We compared case-mix adjusted 30-day readmission rates and differences in index admission LOS between hospital types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adult hospitals without pediatric services exhibited higher readmission rates (25.4%) than AHPS (22.9%) and PH (15.1%). Compared to patients with CF admitted to AH, lower readmission rates were associated with longer LOS at both AHPS (relative ratio [RR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.55) and PH (RR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.28-1.97). Patients with DM admitted to AHPS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91) and PH (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71) also demonstrated lower readmission rates than those admitted to AH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For AYA with CCD, hospital type is associated with differences in readmission rates and LOS. Lower readmission rates at hospitals with pediatric services compared to adult hospitals without pediatric services suggest hospital type has a significant impact on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Things We Do for No Reason™: Routine use of \"denies\" and other stigmatizing language in medical documentation.","authors":"Julia B Caton, Anita Vanka, Rebecca Dougherty","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13527","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Attending physicians in academic hospitals work in supervisory team structures with medical residents to provide patient care. How attendings utilize the electronic health record (EHR) to support learning through supervision is not well understood.
Objective: To compare EHR behavior on teaching versus direct care, including evidence of supervisory calibration to learners.
Methods: Cross-sectional study analysis of EHR metadata from 1721 shifts of hospital medicine faculty at a large, urban academic medical center, January to June 2022. Measures included total EHR time per shift, EHR time outside shift, and time spent on: note-writing, note review/attestation, order entry, and other clinical review. We assessed within physician differences across these service types and used multilevel modeling to determine whether these behaviors varied with resident physicians' experience, accounting for physician-specific signature behavior patterns.
Results: Attendings spent substantially less time in the EHR while on teaching service than on direct service (129 vs. 240 min; p < .001) and apportioned their work differently throughout the day. Physicians were less behaviorally consistent and varied more than their peers when on teaching service. Attendings calibrated their supervision to learners. Attendings logged 12.7% less EHR time when paired with more senior residents than postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) residents (137 vs. 120 min, p = .002). PGY1 presence was also associated with reduced EHR time, suggesting some delegation of supervision to senior trainees.
Conclusion: EHR behaviors on teaching service are highly variable and differ substantially from direct care; a lack of consistency suggests important opportunities to establish best practices for EHR-based supervision and create an effective clinical learning environment.
{"title":"Digital supervision in the clinical learning environment: Characterizing teamwork in the electronic health record.","authors":"Dori A Cross, Josh Weiner, Andrew P J Olson","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13529","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.13529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attending physicians in academic hospitals work in supervisory team structures with medical residents to provide patient care. How attendings utilize the electronic health record (EHR) to support learning through supervision is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare EHR behavior on teaching versus direct care, including evidence of supervisory calibration to learners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study analysis of EHR metadata from 1721 shifts of hospital medicine faculty at a large, urban academic medical center, January to June 2022. Measures included total EHR time per shift, EHR time outside shift, and time spent on: note-writing, note review/attestation, order entry, and other clinical review. We assessed within physician differences across these service types and used multilevel modeling to determine whether these behaviors varied with resident physicians' experience, accounting for physician-specific signature behavior patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attendings spent substantially less time in the EHR while on teaching service than on direct service (129 vs. 240 min; p < .001) and apportioned their work differently throughout the day. Physicians were less behaviorally consistent and varied more than their peers when on teaching service. Attendings calibrated their supervision to learners. Attendings logged 12.7% less EHR time when paired with more senior residents than postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) residents (137 vs. 120 min, p = .002). PGY1 presence was also associated with reduced EHR time, suggesting some delegation of supervision to senior trainees.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EHR behaviors on teaching service are highly variable and differ substantially from direct care; a lack of consistency suggests important opportunities to establish best practices for EHR-based supervision and create an effective clinical learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When is enough, enough?","authors":"Derek R Soled","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13530","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jillian M Cotter, Isabella Zaniletti, Derek J Williams, Sriram Ramgopal, Cristin Q Fritz, Maia Taft, Matt Hall, Elizabeth Temte, Justine Stassun, Krishna Trivedi, Jack Kapes, Jack Lavey, Allison Kempe, Lilliam Ambroggio
Background: Initial oral antibiotics may be as effective as intravenous (IV) antibiotics for children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but further data are needed.
Objective: We evaluated for associations of initial antibiotic route (IV vs. oral) with length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes for children hospitalized with CAP.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included children with CAP who were hospitalized for >48 h, had chest radiographs, and received antibiotics at four children's hospitals between 2014 and 2020. Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System and manual chart review. The exposure was initial antibiotic route (i.e., first antibiotic given intravenously or orally). We performed multivariable regression modeling using inverse probability treatment weights from propensity scores. Outcomes included LOS, oxygen duration, cost, care escalation, and readmission or emergency department revisit.
Results: Of 1147 included children, 37% received initial oral antibiotics. Within the propensity balanced sample, LOS was 73.5 h (IQR 61.0, 99.5) and 78.7 (61.0, 118.0) for patients with initial oral and IV antibiotics, respectively. Children receiving initial oral antibiotics had an 8% reduction in LOS (OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]) and 14% reduction in cost (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.79, 0.94]) versus those receiving initial IV antibiotics. There were no differences in other outcomes.
Conclusions: Children with CAP receiving initial oral antibiotics had reduced LOS and hospital cost without differences in escalated care or return visits. Starting hospitalized children on oral antibiotics is likely a safe and effective alternative to IV treatment.
背景:对于社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患儿,初始口服抗生素可能与静脉注射抗生素同样有效,但还需要进一步的数据:我们评估了初始抗生素使用途径(静脉注射与口服)与 CAP 住院患儿的住院时间(LOS)和次要结果之间的关系:这项多中心、回顾性队列研究纳入了 2014 年至 2020 年期间在四家儿童医院住院超过 48 小时、接受过胸部影像检查并接受过抗生素治疗的 CAP 患儿。数据来自儿科健康信息系统和人工病历审查。暴露为初始抗生素途径(即首次静脉注射或口服抗生素)。我们使用倾向评分中的反概率治疗权重进行了多变量回归建模。结果包括住院时间、吸氧时间、费用、护理升级、再入院或急诊科复诊:结果:在纳入的 1147 名儿童中,37% 接受了初始口服抗生素治疗。在倾向平衡样本中,首次使用口服抗生素和静脉注射抗生素的患者的生命周期分别为 73.5 小时(IQR 61.0,99.5)和 78.7 小时(61.0,118.0)。与最初使用静脉注射抗生素的患儿相比,最初使用口服抗生素的患儿的生命周期缩短了 8%(OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]),费用降低了 14%(OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.79, 0.94])。其他结果没有差异:结论:接受初始口服抗生素治疗的 CAP 患儿缩短了住院时间,降低了住院费用,但在护理升级或复诊方面没有差异。让住院儿童开始口服抗生素可能是静脉注射治疗的一种安全有效的替代方法。
{"title":"Association between initial antibiotic route and outcomes for children hospitalized with pneumonia.","authors":"Jillian M Cotter, Isabella Zaniletti, Derek J Williams, Sriram Ramgopal, Cristin Q Fritz, Maia Taft, Matt Hall, Elizabeth Temte, Justine Stassun, Krishna Trivedi, Jack Kapes, Jack Lavey, Allison Kempe, Lilliam Ambroggio","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initial oral antibiotics may be as effective as intravenous (IV) antibiotics for children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but further data are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated for associations of initial antibiotic route (IV vs. oral) with length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes for children hospitalized with CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included children with CAP who were hospitalized for >48 h, had chest radiographs, and received antibiotics at four children's hospitals between 2014 and 2020. Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System and manual chart review. The exposure was initial antibiotic route (i.e., first antibiotic given intravenously or orally). We performed multivariable regression modeling using inverse probability treatment weights from propensity scores. Outcomes included LOS, oxygen duration, cost, care escalation, and readmission or emergency department revisit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1147 included children, 37% received initial oral antibiotics. Within the propensity balanced sample, LOS was 73.5 h (IQR 61.0, 99.5) and 78.7 (61.0, 118.0) for patients with initial oral and IV antibiotics, respectively. Children receiving initial oral antibiotics had an 8% reduction in LOS (OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]) and 14% reduction in cost (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.79, 0.94]) versus those receiving initial IV antibiotics. There were no differences in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with CAP receiving initial oral antibiotics had reduced LOS and hospital cost without differences in escalated care or return visits. Starting hospitalized children on oral antibiotics is likely a safe and effective alternative to IV treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Padageshwar Sunkara, Raghava Nagaraj, Hieu Nguyen, Stephanie Murphy, Kevin Goslen, Harsh Barot, Timothy Hetherington, Casey Stephens, McKenzie Isreal, Marc Kowalkowski
Background: Early-supported discharge (ESD) hospital-at-home (HaH) programs facilitate hospitalized patients to receive ongoing acute-level care at home, thereby promoting patient-centeredness while improving hospital throughput.
Objectives: The current study aimed to test multiple implementation strategies to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.
Methods: We conducted interrupted time series analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies on weekly HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization at five hospitals. Intervention 1 included provider-focused education and HaH nurse navigator support (July 2021 to May 2022). Intervention 2 added provider-level referral performance feedback and daily electronic health record-based eligibility reports (May 2022 to December 2022). During postintervention (January 2023 to June 2023), implementation strategies were no longer supported by the study team. Clinical outcomes were assessed over time and between patient subgroups.
Results: There were 5951 HaH ESD patients overall. After Intervention 2, we observed immediate increases in weekly HaH ESD referrals (level change mean difference [MD, 95% confidence interval]: 14.8, 5.9-23.6) and capacity utilization (level change MD: 13.9%, 6.2%-21.5%) and additional week-to-week increases in capacity utilization (slope change MD: 0.6%, 0.2%-0.9%), compared to Intervention 1 trends. HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization were sustained postintervention. The proportion of provider-initiated referrals increased over time (Intervention 1: 79.4%, Intervention 2: 90.9%, postintervention: 95.2%). As HaH ESD utilization increased, we observed shorter inpatient length of stay and fewer HaH ESD encounters per visit (p < 0.01). There were small, statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and readmission for residents of rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.
Conclusion: Applying referral-focused provider feedback and daily eligibility reports were effective within a multicomponent approach to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.
{"title":"A time-series analysis examining implementation strategies to increase use of an early-supported discharge hospital at home model.","authors":"Padageshwar Sunkara, Raghava Nagaraj, Hieu Nguyen, Stephanie Murphy, Kevin Goslen, Harsh Barot, Timothy Hetherington, Casey Stephens, McKenzie Isreal, Marc Kowalkowski","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13525","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early-supported discharge (ESD) hospital-at-home (HaH) programs facilitate hospitalized patients to receive ongoing acute-level care at home, thereby promoting patient-centeredness while improving hospital throughput.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current study aimed to test multiple implementation strategies to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interrupted time series analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies on weekly HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization at five hospitals. Intervention 1 included provider-focused education and HaH nurse navigator support (July 2021 to May 2022). Intervention 2 added provider-level referral performance feedback and daily electronic health record-based eligibility reports (May 2022 to December 2022). During postintervention (January 2023 to June 2023), implementation strategies were no longer supported by the study team. Clinical outcomes were assessed over time and between patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5951 HaH ESD patients overall. After Intervention 2, we observed immediate increases in weekly HaH ESD referrals (level change mean difference [MD, 95% confidence interval]: 14.8, 5.9-23.6) and capacity utilization (level change MD: 13.9%, 6.2%-21.5%) and additional week-to-week increases in capacity utilization (slope change MD: 0.6%, 0.2%-0.9%), compared to Intervention 1 trends. HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization were sustained postintervention. The proportion of provider-initiated referrals increased over time (Intervention 1: 79.4%, Intervention 2: 90.9%, postintervention: 95.2%). As HaH ESD utilization increased, we observed shorter inpatient length of stay and fewer HaH ESD encounters per visit (p < 0.01). There were small, statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and readmission for residents of rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Applying referral-focused provider feedback and daily eligibility reports were effective within a multicomponent approach to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Breaking hospital discharge gridlock through policy reforms.","authors":"Robert E Burke, Paula Chatterjee","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13519","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142368051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander A Logan, Lawrence A Haber, Marlene Martín
{"title":"Clinical progress note: Management of the hospitalized patient who uses methamphetamine.","authors":"Alexander A Logan, Lawrence A Haber, Marlene Martín","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13521","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The hospital medicine-infectious diseases career path: Opportunities and insights.","authors":"Marie E Wang, Dean L Winslow, Samir S Shah","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13513","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle Knees, Angela Keniston, Amy Yu, Matthew Sakumoto, Sara Westergaard, Natalie Schwatka, Rachel Peterson, Aveena Kochar, Andrew Auerbach, Tiffany Lee, Marisha Burden
Background: Hospitals and patients rely on effective clinician communication. Asynchronous electronic secure messaging (SM) systems are a common way for hospitalists to communicate, but few studies have evaluated how hospitalists are navigating the adoption of SM and the benefits and challenges they are encountering.
Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess academic hospitalist perspectives on SM to guide future research and quality improvement initiatives.
Methods: This was a mixed methods study utilizing an embedded REDCap survey and six virtual semistructured focus groups. It took place during a Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network Zoom meeting on October 13, 2023. Rapid qualitative methods were used to define major themes.
Results: There were 28 hospitalists and one patient representative across 24 separate academic institutions. There was a 71% survey completion rate (N = 20). SM was felt to be an effective and efficient communication modality but was associated with a large amount of multitasking and interruptions. Perspectives around SM clustered around three main themes: SM has been widely but variably adopted; there is a lack of institutional guidance about how to best engage with SM; and SM is changing the landscape of hospitalist work by increasing ease but decreasing depth of communication, increasing cognitive load, and changing interpersonal relationships. Recommendations for SM improvements included the need for institutions to work with frontline workers to develop and implement clear usage guidelines.
Conclusion: SM is likely contributing to both positive and negative effects for clinicians and patients. Understanding hospitalist perspectives on SM will help guide future research and quality improvement initiatives.
背景:医院和患者都依赖于临床医生的有效沟通。异步电子安全信息(SM)系统是医院医生常用的沟通方式,但很少有研究对医院医生如何采用 SM 系统以及他们获得的益处和遇到的挑战进行评估:本研究旨在评估医院医师对 SM 的看法,以指导未来的研究和质量改进措施:这是一项混合方法研究,采用了嵌入式 REDCap 调查和六个虚拟半结构化焦点小组。研究于 2023 年 10 月 13 日在医院医学再工程网络 Zoom 会议期间进行。采用快速定性方法确定主要议题:共有 28 名医院医生和 1 名患者代表参加了调查,他们来自 24 个不同的学术机构。调查完成率为 71%(N=20)。人们认为 SM 是一种有效且高效的交流方式,但也与大量的多任务处理和干扰有关。围绕 SM 的观点主要有三个主题:SM 已被广泛采用,但效果参差不齐;在如何最好地使用 SM 方面缺乏机构指导;SM 正在改变住院医生的工作面貌,因为它增加了沟通的便捷性,但降低了沟通的深度,增加了认知负荷,并改变了人际关系。关于改进 SM 的建议包括:各机构需要与一线工作者合作,制定并实施明确的使用指南:SM 可能会对临床医生和患者产生积极和消极的影响。了解住院医生对 SM 的看法将有助于指导未来的研究和质量改进措施。
{"title":"Academic hospitalist perspectives on the benefits and challenges of secure messaging: A mixed methods analysis.","authors":"Michelle Knees, Angela Keniston, Amy Yu, Matthew Sakumoto, Sara Westergaard, Natalie Schwatka, Rachel Peterson, Aveena Kochar, Andrew Auerbach, Tiffany Lee, Marisha Burden","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13522","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitals and patients rely on effective clinician communication. Asynchronous electronic secure messaging (SM) systems are a common way for hospitalists to communicate, but few studies have evaluated how hospitalists are navigating the adoption of SM and the benefits and challenges they are encountering.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess academic hospitalist perspectives on SM to guide future research and quality improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed methods study utilizing an embedded REDCap survey and six virtual semistructured focus groups. It took place during a Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network Zoom meeting on October 13, 2023. Rapid qualitative methods were used to define major themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 28 hospitalists and one patient representative across 24 separate academic institutions. There was a 71% survey completion rate (N = 20). SM was felt to be an effective and efficient communication modality but was associated with a large amount of multitasking and interruptions. Perspectives around SM clustered around three main themes: SM has been widely but variably adopted; there is a lack of institutional guidance about how to best engage with SM; and SM is changing the landscape of hospitalist work by increasing ease but decreasing depth of communication, increasing cognitive load, and changing interpersonal relationships. Recommendations for SM improvements included the need for institutions to work with frontline workers to develop and implement clear usage guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SM is likely contributing to both positive and negative effects for clinicians and patients. Understanding hospitalist perspectives on SM will help guide future research and quality improvement initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142368050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}