The Iowa orthopaedic journal最新文献

High-energy tibial fractures often present with associated soft tissue injuries, including neuro-vascular damage, complicating the treatment decision. A 33-year-old male presented with Gustilo Anderson type IIIA fracture of the left distal tibia and fibula with associated closed calcaneus fracture and tibial nerve transection. Amputation was discussed, but the decision was made for limb salvage with nerve allograft. The patient displayed satisfactory functional recovery at 29 months postoperatively without need for major revision, grafting, arthrodesis, or amputation. This case report provides an example of successful limb salvage utilizing tibial nerve allograft in a complex high-energy lower extremity injury. Level of Evidence: IV.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a lasting impact on patients seeking total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) including more patients undergoing same day discharge (SDD) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to assess whether expansion of SDD TJA during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in more early complications following TJA. We anticipated that as many institutions quickly launched SDD TJA programs there may be an increase in 30-day complications.

Methods: We retrospectively queried the ACS-NSQIP database for all patients undergoing primary elective TJA from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. Participants who underwent THA or TKA between January 1, 2018 and March 1, 2020 were grouped into pre-COVID and between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 were grouped into post-COVID categories. Patients with length of stay greater than 0 were excluded. Primary outcome was any complication at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included readmission and re-operation 30 days.

Results: A total of 14,438 patients underwent TKA, with 9,580 occurring pre-COVID and 4,858 post-COVID. There was no difference in rates of total complication between the pre-COVID (3.55%) and post-COVID (3.99%) groups (p=0.197). Rates of readmissions for were similar for the pre-COVID (1.75%) and post-COVID (1.98%) groups (p=0.381). There was no statistically significant difference in respiratory complications between the pre-COVID (0.41%) and post-COVID group (0.23%, p=0.03). A total of 12,265 patients underwent THA, with 7,680 occurring pre-COVID and 4,585 post-COVID. There was no difference in rates of total complication between the pre-COVID (3.25%) and post-COVID (3.49%) groups (p=0.52). Rates of readmissions for were similar for the pre-COVID (1.77%) and post-COVID (1.68%) groups (p=0.381). There was no statistically significant difference in respiratory complications between the pre-COVID (0.16%) and post-COVID group (0.07%, p=0.26). Combined data to include THA and TKA patients did not find a statistical difference in the rate of complications or readmission but did note a decrease in the rate of combined respiratory complications in the post-COVID group (0.15% vs. 0.30%, p=0.028).

Conclusion: Rapid expansion of SDD TJA during the COVID-19 pandemic did not increase overall complication, readmission, or re-operation rates. Level of Evidence: IV.

Background: Many patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the femur undergo prophylactic surgical fixation for impending pathologic fractures; intramedullary nailing (IMN) being the most common fixation type. However, surgeons often question if IMN fixation provides sufficient improvements in mechanical strength for particular metastatic lesions. Our goal was to use patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling to computationally evaluate the effects of simulated IMN fixation on the mechanics of femurs affected with MBD.

Methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans were available retrospectively from 48 patients (54 femurs) with proximal femoral metastases. The CT scans were used to create patient-specific, non-linear, voxel-based FE models of the femur, simulating the instant of peak hip joint contact force during normal walking. FE analyses were repeated after incorporating virtual IMN fixation (Smith and Nephew, TRIGEN INTERTAN) into the same femurs. Femur strength and load-to-strength ratio (LSR; lower LSR indicates lower fracture risk) were compared between untreated and IMN conditions using statistical analyses.

Results: IMN fixation resulted in a very modest average 10% increase in mechanical strength (p<0.001), which was associated with a slight 7% reduction in fracture risk (p<0.001). However, there was considerable variation in fracture risk reduction between individual femurs (0.13-50%). In femurs with the largest reduction in fracture risk (>10%), IMN hardware directly passed through a considerable section of that femur's metastatic lesion. Femurs with lytic (10%) and diffuse (9%) metastases tended to have greater reductions in fracture risk compared to femurs with blastic (5%) and mixed (4%) metastases (p=0.073).

Conclusion: Given the mechanically strong baseline condition of most femurs in this cohort, evident by the low fracture risk at the time of CT scanning, the relative increase in stiffness with the addition of the IMN hardware may not make a substantial contribution to overall mechanical strength. The mechanical gains of IMN fixation in femurs with MBD appear most beneficial when the hardware traverses an adequate section of the lesion. Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Though evidence demonstrating benefits of local anesthetic continues to compound, a consensus among surgeons regarding optimal anesthetic modality has not been reached. General and regional anesthetic may still be preferred for patient anxiety, concomitant procedures, increased complexity, or poor patient pain tolerance. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to analyze trends in anesthetic utilization using a large-scale state healthcare database for common outpatient hand procedures. We hypothesize that over the 10 years between 2010-2019, local anesthetic [including Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia with no Tourniquet (WALANT)] utilization use for common hand procedures has increased, while the use of general and regional anesthesia has decreased.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed using the Texas Healthcare Information Collection Outpatient Database between 2010-2019. The de-identified data was queried for reported Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) anesthetic and associated procedure codes for the following ambulatory techniques: open carpal tunnel release, endoscopic carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, De Quervain's release, partial palmar fasciectomy, and hand mass excision. Anesthetic options included: regional anesthesia (RA), local or WALANT anesthesia (LA), and general anesthesia (GA).

Results: There were 340,117 procedures performed during the study period. 98.14% of patient records reported LA application, while GA and RA only accounted for 0.41% and 1.45%, respectively. No significant growth was found for each form of anesthetic individually [LA: -0.12%, RA: 0.09%, and GA: 0.03%]. However, a significant difference in proportional growth is present when comparing all anesthetics (Figure 1, p<0.001). Commercial/ private insurance was the most common payer regardless of anesthesia type, though Medicaid payment source covered a larger proportion of procedures performed under GA [Medicaid: 2.48%, Medicare: 0.37%, worker's compensation: 0.12%, commercial/private insurance: 0.20%].

Conclusion: LA was the most utilized modality over the study period, though a significant proportion of usage has shifted back towards RA and GA over time. Commercial/private insurance was the most frequent reimbursement source for all procedures, though Medicaid covered disproportionately more procedures utilizing GA. RA use was noted to be disproportionately higher in mid-sized population centers (2-4 million in population). Level of Evidence: IV.

Background: ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) and other spinal fusion surgeries are among the most common orthopaedic procedures requiring blood transfusions. However, blood transfusions have been associated with various complications, including adverse reactions and infections. The present study aims to identify independent risk factors for blood transfusions in patients undergoing single-level ALIF specifically to better identify high risk patients and optimize perioperative management.

Methods: All patients who had undergone single-level ALIF patients for the treatment of degenerative spinal conditions, excluding traumatic, pathologic, and infectious etiologies, were identified by querying a multi-institutional surgical registry from 2005 to 2018. Multi-level fusions, PLIF/TLIF, and posterior procedures were also excluded. Mann-Whitney-U-Tests were used to analyze continuous variables, while Fisher's-Exact-Tests/Bonferroni-Corrected-Tests were used for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with alternating backward stepwise elimination and forward entry was implemented to identify significant predictors for blood transfusions within 72 hours after incision. The predicted probabilities were used in post-regression diagnostics to generate a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to assess model performance.

Results: 4,792 single-level ALIF patients met inclusion criteria - 183 (3.82%) had received blood transfusions within 72 hours after incision and 4,609 (96.18%) had not. Age ≥60 years (OR 1.954, p<0.001), preoperative transfusions (OR 33.758, p=0.023), extended operative times (≥197.0 minutes; 75th percentile) (OR 4.645, p<0.001), ASA≥3 (OR 1.395, p<0.001) and preoperative hematocrit levels (Hct) 30.00-37.99 (OR 1.562, p=0.016) and Hct <30.00 (OR 6.334, p<0.001) were shown to be significant independent risk factors for perioperative blood transfusions. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC; C-statistic) was 0.759 (p<0.001), indicating relatively strong discriminatory ability/predictability of the final model.

Conclusion: Several independent risk factors including age ≥60 years, preoperative blood transfusions and extended operative times increased risk for blood transfusion following single-level ALIF. The present study aims to help surgeons identify high-risk patients to better communicate postoperative expectations and optimize patients to reduce the risk of transfusions and secondary complications. Level of Evidence: III.

Background: The annual volume of patients requiring revision total hip arthroplasty prior to age 60 is projected to increase considerably. Despite this, outcome data for revision THA in these younger patients remain limited. The purpose of this study was to define implant survivorship, identify risk factors for re-revision, and determine clinical outcomes of revision THA in patients aged ≤60 years.

Methods: We identified 191 revision THAs performed in patients aged ≤60 years. Minimum 4-year follow-up was obtained in 141 (73.8%) hips (mean 10.3 years [range, 4-20]). Mean age was 48 years (range, 20-60). Forty-five hips (32%) had previously been revised. Indications for index revision included aseptic loosening (28%), polyethylene wear (26%), dislocation (20%), and infection (14%). Outcome measures were Kaplan-Meier survival free from re-revision and patient-reported outcome scores (mHHS, UCLA).

Results: Survivorship free from re-revision for any cause was 78% [95% CI=70-85] at five years and 71% [62-78] at ten years. The most common indication for re-revision at both five and ten years was dislocation (12% [8-19], 16% [10-23]), followed by infection (6% [3-12], 10% [5-18]) and aseptic loosening (2% [1-7], 4% [1-11]). Mean scores were improved from baseline at six (mHHS +21.4, UCLA +0.9) and twelve years (mHHS +13.4, UCLA +0.5).

Conclusion: Revision THA in patients less than 60 years of age was associated with considerably lower rates of early loosening-related failure than historically reported. Recurrent dislocation and infection appear to remain challenges in this population. Despite improvements in survivorship from earlier studies, patient-reported functional improvements remained relatively unchanged. Level of Evidence: IV.

Background: The Ponseti method of treatment for clubfoot which utilizes serial manipulations and casting in order to achieve correction of the deformity has become increasingly popular due to its robust track record of success without the need for surgical intervention and is considered the gold standard for clubfoot treatment. Exposure of new technology in the scientific literature is associated with the diffusion and adoption of that technology in clinical practice. The aim of this study sought to identify tendencies in the thematic changes in medical literature regarding the treatment of congenital clubfoot over a period of twenty-three years, from 1997 to 2021.

Methods: The Medline databases were searched for articles containing the keyword "clubfoot". Articles from 1997 to 2021 were identified and analyzed by institutions which published the articles, and whether treatment was with the Ponseti method or surgical interventions. We also observed in order the geographic diffusion of the Ponseti method.

Results: 2067 articles were found in Pubmed referencing clubfoot, and in these publications 577 addressed the Ponseti method and 273 articles discussed surgical treatment. From 1997 - 2000, the only articles discussing the Ponseti Method were from Iowa,in the United States. The increasing number of publications about the Ponseti method and the decrease in publications about surgical treatment for clubfoot occurred after 2003. In 1997, only one country had a publication regarding the Ponseti method; by 2018, 24 countries published articles on the method.

Conclusion: These results suggest a trend of dissemination of knowledge to additional countries, reflecting the more widespread usage of the method throughout the world, and global outreach as a result of the work of Ponseti International Association. Level of Evidence: II.

Background: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions following hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); including risk factors and post-treatment outcomes.

Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we queried PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English-language studies with minimum 6-month follow-up after primary or revision HA for FAI, which reported the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions. Potential adhesion risk factors, such as anchor type used and protocol for capsule closure, were assessed. Pre-operative and post-operative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) values were compared in studies that reported them.

Results: Thirty-seven articles were included (24 primary HA; 13 revision HA). There were 6747 patients who underwent primary HA (6874 hips; 3005 female, 44%). The incidence of capsulolabral adhesions, confirmed surgically during revision HA, was low. Patients undergoing surgical treatment reported postoperative improvement per modified Harris Hip Scores. Data for 746 patients undergoing second revision HA (761 hips; 449 female, 60%), showed an incidence of adhesions greater than that of primary HA patients.

Conclusion: While the incidence of symptomatic capsulolabral adhesions after primary hip arthroscopy is low; revision hip arthroscopy is strongly associated with adhesion development. Lysis of adhesions in primary hip arthroscopy patients reliably improved patient-reported outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV.

Femoral fragility fractures cause substantial morbidity and mortality in older adults. Mortality has generally been approximated between 10-20% in the first year after fracture and among those who do survive, another 20-60% require assistance with basic activities within 1-2 years following fracture.¹ Malnutrition is common and perpetuates these poor outcomes. Nutrition supplementation has potential to prevent post-injury malnutrition, preserve functional muscle mass, and improve outcomes in older adults with femoral fragility fractures, however high-quality evidence is lacking, thus limiting translation of interventions into clinical practice. This review article is designed to highlight gaps in the evidence investigating nutrition interventions in this population and identify barriers for translation to clinical practice. Our goal is to guide future nutrition intervention research in older adults with femoral fragility fractures. Level of Evidence: V.

Background: Presentation of research at national orthopaedic meetings and subsequent publication are important for both information exchange among surgeons and individual academic advancement. However, the academic landscape and pressures that researchers face may differ greatly across different subspecialties. This study attempts to explore and quantify differences in research presented at national conferences and its implication on ultimate likelihood of publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Methods: All abstracts from the Annual Meetings of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) from 2016 and 2017 were reviewed and categorized based on subspecialty focus. Resulting publications were identified using a systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Multivariate binary logistic regression modelling was used to assess the predictive value of abstract characteristics on eventual publication.

Results: A total of 1805 abstracts from the 2016 and 2017 AAOS conferences were reviewed. The overall publication rate of abstracts following the AAOS meetings was 71.6%, with an average time to publication from abstract submission deadline and impact factor of 19.8 months and 2.878, respectively. Statistical differences were observed across subspecialties with respect to publication rate (p<0.001), time to publication (p<0.001), and impact factor (p<0.001). The subspecialty with the highest publication rate, largest impact factor, and shortest average time to publication was Sports Medicine with 83.2%, 3.98, and 17.6 months, respectively; despite lower average sample size (p<0.001) and frequency of multicenter design (p<0.001) compared with other subspecialties. The subspecialty with the lowest publication rate and impact factor was Hand and Wrist with 53.3% and 1.41, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrates a lower likelihood for internationally authored abstracts (OR: 0.75, p=0.021) and higher likelihood for basic science abstracts (OR: 1.52, p-value=0.023) to reach publication.

Conclusion: Differences in publication rate across orthopaedic subspecialties were observed with articles in sports medicine more likely to be published, published quickly, and featured in a higher impact factor journals. Understanding these differences, and how they relate to the publication and promotion of novel research, is important for orthopaedic researchers. Level of Evidence: IV.