Actas urologicas espanolas最新文献

Introduction and objectives: Long-term use of an indwelling catheter is associated with complications such as catheter encrustation and infection. Canoxidin® is a novel oral treatment that can potentially prevent catheter encrustation, as it contains a urine acidifier and a combination of two crystallization inhibitors. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Canoxidin® on catheter encrustation in patients with indwelling Foley catheters.

Patients and methods: This was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neuro-urology patients aged ≥18 years with an indwelling catheter (urethral or suprapubic) were randomized to treatment consisting of either Canoxidin® or placebo for one month. Foley catheters (two per patient, one before treatment and one after treatment) were removed for analysis of the presence and degree of encrustation.

Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled and randomized, 28 of whom had analyzable catheters (13 assigned to Canoxidin® and 15 assigned to placebo). The patients had a mean age of 51.8 years, and eight (28.6%) were female. Two patients (13.3%) in the placebo group and eight patients (61.5%) in the Canoxidin® group experienced an improvement (less encrustation). There was a significant association between Canoxidin® and improvement (odds ratio: 10.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.6 to 66.9, P = 0.016). No adverse effects attributable to the treatment were reported.

Conclusions: The overall rate of catheter encrustation was high among those with indwelling Foley catheters. One-month treatment with Canoxidin® reduced the formation of these encrustations, with an excellent short-term safety profile.

In recent years, various aspects of prostate cancer (PC) management have undergone significant changes, including the implementation of therapeutic strategies such as the use of new hormonal agents like abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide and the incorporation of next generation imaging techniques (NGI). However, the evidence regarding the role of NGI and the therapeutic decision-making based on their findings is not solid. Following the methodology of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC), a multidisciplinary expert consensus was developed to address controversial questions concerning the use of NGI and clinical management in four priority scenarios: localized PC, PC after radical prostatectomy, PC after radiotherapy with curative intent, and metastatic hormone-sensitive PC. This consensus represents the opinions of medical oncology, radiation oncology and urology physicians and provides useful recommendations for clinical practice.

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the tumor with the highest incidence in Spanish men. The implementation of health literacy and therapeutic education programs adapted to the needs of the population could be a resource to minimize the sequelae derived from the treatments used to combat this pathology. To this end, it would be necessary to know the level of health literacy about prostate cancer.

Objective: To determine the level of health literacy in prostate cancer in the Spanish male population using the validated version of the PCKQ-12 for the Spanish population.

Methodology: Cross-sectional, population-based, descriptive study. Spanish-speaking men of legal age were included. To carry out the study, an ad hoc questionnaire was designed on the Google Forms platform, which was distributed via WhatsApp. Previously, it was necessary to validate the PCKQ-12 to the Spanish population in two phases, a first phase for translation and cross-cultural adaptation and a second phase to test the measurement properties.

Results: The Spanish version of the PCKQ-12 showed good language, conceptual, semantic and content equivalence and could be used to assess health literacy in prostate cancer. Three hundred and seventy Spanish men with a mean age of 43.87 (SD 13.65) years responded to the questionnaire. The level of prostate cancer health literacy found was low (6.72 points), being 2 points higher in health men.

Conclusion: Health literacy about prostate cancer in the Spanish male population is low.

Objective: This descriptive study examines quality of life in women undergoing placement of a midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study based on data from 51 women consecutively undergoing this procedure at a tertiary hospital in the years 2014 and 2015. The main outcome variable was quality of life assessed through the Sandvick severity test and International Consultation on Incontinence Short Quality of Life Questionnaire (ICIQ-IU-SF) at the time points baseline or presurgery, and 6 months and 5 years postsurgery. Factors associated with treatment failure were determined through binary logistic regression.

Results: At 5-year follow up we obtained an absolute reduction of 8.78 points (95% CI 6.43-11.14; p < 0.001) in the ICIQ-IU-SF questionnaire and 4.54 (95% CI 3.25-5.83; p < 0.001) in the Sandvick severity test score, compared to baseline, in the 35 patients that completed follow-up. Out of the 51 patients that were followed, the rate of success in incontinence correction was 86.3% (44/50) with a failure rate of 12% (6/50). Multiparity and previous gynaecological surgery were identified as predisposing factors for treatment failure. Obesity was associated with a worse treatment outcome.

Conclusion: Sling treatment for incontinence was successful in 86.3% (44/50) of participants and remained effective 5 years after surgery in terms of quality of life.