首页 > 最新文献

Biochemia medica最新文献

英文 中文
The impact of demand management on vitamin D testing. 需求管理对维生素D检测的影响。
Pub Date : 2025-06-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.020707
Juan José Perales-Afán, Diego Aparicio-Pelaz, Juan José Puente-Lanzarote, Marta Fabre

Introduction: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone health, with increasing evidence suggesting associations with non-skeletal diseases. However, the lack of consensus on optimal concentrations and laboratory variability has led to clinical uncertainty and excessive testing. This study evaluates the impact of demand management strategies and revised cut-off points on test volumes, unperformed determinations, and cost savings.

Material and methods: A retrospective study (January 2015-May 2024) analyzed all 25-OH-D requests. Concentrations of 25-OH-D were measured using electrochemiluminescence assays on a Cobas C8000. An annual trend analysis of 25-OH-D test requests was performed to evaluate changes in demand. In 2018, vitamin D deficiency prevalence was assessed according to three cut-off values (75, 50 and 30 nmol/L). We assessed the impact of demand management rules, implemented in May 2022, to reduce unnecessary testing. The follow-up testing rate was calculated as the proportion of repeat tests within 12 months after determination.

Results: There was 25-OH-D testing increased from 10,830 in 2015 to nearly 85,000 in 2023. Demand management strategies led to 12,406 rejections in 2022 (from May onwards), 16,809 in 2023, and 7566 in 2024 (until May), saving €85,600. Follow-up testing rates dropped from ~15% before 2022 to ~5% afterward. Lowering the deficiency threshold from 75 to 50 nmol/L reduced deficiency diagnoses from > 70% to < 50%; at 30 nmol/L, rates could drop to ~10-11%.

Conclusions: Demand management strategies effectively reduce unnecessary testing and healthcare costs. Establishing appropriate reference values prevents overestimation of vitamin D deficiency, optimizing clinical and economic outcomes.

25-羟基维生素D (25-OH-D)对钙稳态和骨骼健康至关重要,越来越多的证据表明它与非骨骼疾病有关。然而,对最佳浓度和实验室可变性缺乏共识导致临床不确定性和过度检测。该研究评估了需求管理策略的影响,以及对测试量、未执行的决定和成本节约的修订截止点。材料和方法:一项回顾性研究(2015年1月- 2024年5月)分析了所有25-OH-D请求。在Cobas C8000上用电化学发光法测定25-OH-D的浓度。对25-OH-D测试请求进行年度趋势分析,以评估需求的变化。2018年,维生素D缺乏症的患病率根据三个临界值(75、50和30 nmol/L)进行评估。我们评估了2022年5月实施的需求管理规则的影响,以减少不必要的测试。随访检测率以确定后12个月内重复检测的比例计算。结果:25-OH-D检测从2015年的10830例增加到2023年的近85000例。需求管理策略导致2022年(5月起)12,406次拒绝,2023年16,809次拒绝,2024年7566次拒绝(截至5月),节省了85,600欧元。随访检测率从2022年前的~15%下降到2022年后的~5%。将缺乏症阈值从75 nmol/L降低到50 nmol/L,缺乏症诊断率从70%降低到50%以下;在30 nmol/L时,反应速率可降至~10-11%。结论:需求管理策略有效降低了不必要的检测和医疗成本。建立适当的参考值可防止高估维生素D缺乏症,优化临床和经济结果。
{"title":"The impact of demand management on vitamin D testing.","authors":"Juan José Perales-Afán, Diego Aparicio-Pelaz, Juan José Puente-Lanzarote, Marta Fabre","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.020707","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.020707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone health, with increasing evidence suggesting associations with non-skeletal diseases. However, the lack of consensus on optimal concentrations and laboratory variability has led to clinical uncertainty and excessive testing. This study evaluates the impact of demand management strategies and revised cut-off points on test volumes, unperformed determinations, and cost savings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study (January 2015-May 2024) analyzed all 25-OH-D requests. Concentrations of 25-OH-D were measured using electrochemiluminescence assays on a Cobas C8000. An annual trend analysis of 25-OH-D test requests was performed to evaluate changes in demand. In 2018, vitamin D deficiency prevalence was assessed according to three cut-off values (75, 50 and 30 nmol/L). We assessed the impact of demand management rules, implemented in May 2022, to reduce unnecessary testing. The follow-up testing rate was calculated as the proportion of repeat tests within 12 months after determination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was 25-OH-D testing increased from 10,830 in 2015 to nearly 85,000 in 2023. Demand management strategies led to 12,406 rejections in 2022 (from May onwards), 16,809 in 2023, and 7566 in 2024 (until May), saving €85,600. Follow-up testing rates dropped from ~15% before 2022 to ~5% afterward. Lowering the deficiency threshold from 75 to 50 nmol/L reduced deficiency diagnoses from > 70% to < 50%; at 30 nmol/L, rates could drop to ~10-11%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demand management strategies effectively reduce unnecessary testing and healthcare costs. Establishing appropriate reference values prevents overestimation of vitamin D deficiency, optimizing clinical and economic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 2","pages":"020707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161517/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144304272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Routine data analysis for moderate hemolysis interference correction in neuron specific enolase quantification. 神经元特异性烯醇化酶定量中适度溶血干扰校正的常规数据分析。
Pub Date : 2025-06-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.020802
Leyre Ruiz, Tomás Munoz, Alvaro González, Estibaliz Alegre

Introduction: Serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) is used as neuroendocrine tumor and central nervous system damage marker. It is present in variable concentrations in erythrocytes and hemolysis interferes in serum NSE quantification. Our aim was to develop a correction formula for moderate hemolysis, based on repeated patient samples instead of artificial sample doping with hemolysates.

Materials and methods: We searched in laboratory informatics system for patients with sample pairs obtained within 24 h, for NSE quantification. We registered NSE and hemolytic index (NSE1 and HI1) from the first moderate hemolyzed sample (HI: 15-80), and from the second non-hemolyzed sample obtained afterwards (NSE2 and HI2). In a development cohort (N = 41), we obtained the formula NSEcalc = NSE1 - (0.354 x (HI1 - HI2)) - 0.162, which was later used in the validation cohort (N = 26) to calculate NSE corrected concentrations (NSEcalc).

Results: Concentrations of NSE2 differed from NSE1 (P = < 0.001) but not from NSEcalc (P = 0.291). In 84% samples, NSE1 had a relative bias from NSE that exceeded the 14% limit of total error allowable, with a median relative bias of 22.5%. Meanwhile, the bias between NSE2 concentrations and NSEcalc was - 0.4 µg/L (95% confidence interval = - 3.8 to 4.5), the relative bias was 8.3% and only 23% of samples exceeded the 14% limit. Formula usefulness was limited to moderate hemolytic samples.

Conclusions: In summary, with this innovative approach, the NSEcalc bias is low enough to have clinical significance, so re-drawings of blood samples might be avoided. This approach also opens the possibility to correct the estimation of other magnitude concentrations affected by in vitro hemolysis.

血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)作为神经内分泌肿瘤和中枢神经系统损伤标志物。它以不同的浓度存在于红细胞和溶血干扰血清NSE定量。我们的目标是开发一种中度溶血的校正公式,基于重复的患者样本,而不是人工样本中掺入溶血物。材料和方法:在实验室信息系统中检索24 h内获得的患者对样本,进行NSE定量。我们记录了第一个中度溶血样本(HI: 15-80)的NSE和溶血指数(NSE1和HI1),以及随后获得的第二个非溶血样本(NSE2和HI2)的NSE1和HI1。在发展队列(N = 41)中,我们得到公式NSEcalc = NSE1 - (0.354 x (HI1 - HI2)) - 0.162,随后在验证队列(N = 26)中使用该公式计算NSE校正浓度(NSEcalc)。结果:NSE2与NSE1浓度差异显著(P = < 0.001),但与NSEcalc浓度差异无显著性(P = 0.291)。在84%的样本中,NSE1与NSE的相对偏差超过了允许的总误差的14%,中位相对偏差为22.5%。同时,NSE2浓度与NSEcalc之间的偏差为- 0.4µg/L(95%置信区间= - 3.8 ~ 4.5),相对偏差为8.3%,只有23%的样品超过14%的限值。配方的有效性仅限于中度溶血样品。结论:总之,通过这种创新的方法,NSEcalc偏倚足够低,具有临床意义,因此可以避免重新绘制血液样本。这种方法也开启了纠正其他受体外溶血影响的浓度估计的可能性。
{"title":"Routine data analysis for moderate hemolysis interference correction in neuron specific enolase quantification.","authors":"Leyre Ruiz, Tomás Munoz, Alvaro González, Estibaliz Alegre","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.020802","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.020802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) is used as neuroendocrine tumor and central nervous system damage marker. It is present in variable concentrations in erythrocytes and hemolysis interferes in serum NSE quantification. Our aim was to develop a correction formula for moderate hemolysis, based on repeated patient samples instead of artificial sample doping with hemolysates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched in laboratory informatics system for patients with sample pairs obtained within 24 h, for NSE quantification. We registered NSE and hemolytic index (NSE1 and HI1) from the first moderate hemolyzed sample (HI: 15-80), and from the second non-hemolyzed sample obtained afterwards (NSE2 and HI2). In a development cohort (N = 41), we obtained the formula NSE<sub>calc</sub> = NSE1 - (0.354 x (HI1 - HI2)) - 0.162, which was later used in the validation cohort (N = 26) to calculate NSE corrected concentrations (NSE<sub>calc</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concentrations of NSE2 differed from NSE1 (P = < 0.001) but not from NSE<sub>calc</sub> (P = 0.291). In 84% samples, NSE1 had a relative bias from NSE that exceeded the 14% limit of total error allowable, with a median relative bias of 22.5%. Meanwhile, the bias between NSE2 concentrations and NSE<sub>calc</sub> was - 0.4 µg/L (95% confidence interval = - 3.8 to 4.5), the relative bias was 8.3% and only 23% of samples exceeded the 14% limit. Formula usefulness was limited to moderate hemolytic samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, with this innovative approach, the NSE<sub>calc</sub> bias is low enough to have clinical significance, so re-drawings of blood samples might be avoided. This approach also opens the possibility to correct the estimation of other magnitude concentrations affected by <i>in vitro</i> hemolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 2","pages":"020802"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161513/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144304271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategic use of Big Data: implementing reference intervals for serum folate and serum cobalamin. 策略性使用大数据:实施血清叶酸和血清钴胺素的参考区间。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010705
Alicia Madurga, Ariadna Arbiol-Roca, Maria Rosa Navarro-Badal, Anna Cortes-Bosch de Basea, Dolors Dot-Bach

Introduction: Defining trustworthy reference intervals (RIs) for serum folate (FOL) or serum cobalamin (VITB12) is a difficult task. The purpose of this study is to use an indirect approach from the laboratory information's system to indirectly generate RIs for FOL and VITB12.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was performed at a tertiary-care laboratory's hospital during 12 months. All FOL and VITB12 tests were measured using a Cobas8000 e801 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The RIs were calculated using a non-parametric approach. The RIs established in the present study were verified by calculating the fraction of RIs that fell outside the new RIs, in two validation cohorts sampled using the direct and indirect method.

Results: A total of 19,214 (FOL) and 27,420 (VITB12) results were obtained. The RIs were 4.5 nmol/L (90% confidence intervals (CI) 4.4-4.6) to 38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5) for FOL and 140 pmol/L (CI 139-141) to 659 pmol/L (CI 657-660) for VITB12. The verification included 8,798 FOL results and 7,365 VITB12 results. For both magnitudes was acceptable since only 0.1% of FOL and 0.02% of VITB12 results fell outside the RIs. Finally, the RIs were verified using a direct method with twenty individuals. For FOL 20/20 cases and 19/20 of VITB12 cases fell within the estimated RIs.

Conclusions: In summary, the use of an indirect data approach has enabled us to calculate RIs for FOL and VITB12. The RIs obtained in our study are lower than those proposed by the manufacturer for both FOL and VITB12.

定义血清叶酸(FOL)或血清钴胺素(VITB12)的可信参考区间(RIs)是一项艰巨的任务。本研究的目的是使用实验室信息系统的间接方法间接生成FOL和VITB12的RIs。材料和方法:在一家三级保健实验室医院进行了为期12个月的回顾性观察研究。所有FOL和VITB12测试均使用Cobas8000 e801系统(罗氏诊断公司,德国曼海姆)进行测量。RIs采用非参数方法计算。在使用直接和间接方法抽样的两个验证队列中,通过计算落在新RIs之外的RIs的比例来验证本研究中建立的RIs。结果:共获得19214个(FOL)和27420个(VITB12)结果。FOL的RIs为4.5 nmol/L(90%置信区间(CI) 4.4-4.6)至38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5), VITB12的RIs为140 pmol/L (CI 139-141)至659 pmol/L (CI 657-660)。验证包括8,798个FOL结果和7,365个VITB12结果。这两个数值都是可以接受的,因为只有0.1%的FOL和0.02%的VITB12结果落在RIs之外。最后,用20个个体的直接法对RIs进行了验证。20/20的FOL病例和19/20的VITB12病例在估计的RIs范围内。结论:总之,使用间接数据方法使我们能够计算FOL和VITB12的RIs。在我们的研究中获得的RIs低于制造商提出的FOL和VITB12的RIs。
{"title":"Strategic use of Big Data: implementing reference intervals for serum folate and serum cobalamin.","authors":"Alicia Madurga, Ariadna Arbiol-Roca, Maria Rosa Navarro-Badal, Anna Cortes-Bosch de Basea, Dolors Dot-Bach","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010705","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.010705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Defining trustworthy reference intervals (RIs) for serum folate (FOL) or serum cobalamin (VITB12) is a difficult task. The purpose of this study is to use an indirect approach from the laboratory information's system to indirectly generate RIs for FOL and VITB12.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed at a tertiary-care laboratory's hospital during 12 months. All FOL and VITB12 tests were measured using a Cobas8000 e801 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The RIs were calculated using a non-parametric approach. The RIs established in the present study were verified by calculating the fraction of RIs that fell outside the new RIs, in two validation cohorts sampled using the direct and indirect method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19,214 (FOL) and 27,420 (VITB12) results were obtained. The RIs were 4.5 nmol/L (90% confidence intervals (CI) 4.4-4.6) to 38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5) for FOL and 140 pmol/L (CI 139-141) to 659 pmol/L (CI 657-660) for VITB12. The verification included 8,798 FOL results and 7,365 VITB12 results. For both magnitudes was acceptable since only 0.1% of FOL and 0.02% of VITB12 results fell outside the RIs. Finally, the RIs were verified using a direct method with twenty individuals. For FOL 20/20 cases and 19/20 of VITB12 cases fell within the estimated RIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, the use of an indirect data approach has enabled us to calculate RIs for FOL and VITB12. The RIs obtained in our study are lower than those proposed by the manufacturer for both FOL and VITB12.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"010705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838714/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143461557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding green discoloration in serum and citrate plasma samples: a case report. 了解血清和柠檬酸盐血浆样品中的绿色变色:一个病例报告。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.011001
Iva Friščić, Sonja Perkov, Mirjana Mariana Kardum Paro

This case report investigates the occurrence of green discoloration in serum and citrate plasma samples collected from a male adult patient following a multivisceral organ transplant. In collected samples, it was necessary to investigate the influence of sample discoloration on the results of laboratory tests and to determine the appropriate approach to sample management. Hematology, coagulation and blood gas analysis showed no flags, but the biochemical lipemia index was susceptible to positive interference, necessitating dilution of the native sample. Despite the green discoloration, both native and diluted samples exhibited minimal interference on routine clinical chemistry analyses, demonstrating the reliability of the laboratory test results. This case report underscores the influence of preanalytical factors on the results of laboratory tests, the need for a thorough assessment of the sample adequacy for laboratory testing and the strict application of appropriate guidelines in the sample management in order to make an accurate diagnosis and ensure optimal patient care.

本病例报告调查了在多脏器移植后收集的男性成年患者血清和柠檬酸盐血浆样本中发生绿色变色的情况。在收集的样品中,有必要调查样品变色对实验室测试结果的影响,并确定适当的样品管理方法。血液学、凝血和血气分析未见异常,但生化血脂指数易受阳性干扰,需要对原生样品进行稀释。尽管绿色变色,原生和稀释的样品在常规临床化学分析中表现出最小的干扰,证明了实验室测试结果的可靠性。该病例报告强调分析前因素对实验室检测结果的影响,需要彻底评估实验室检测样本的充足性,并在样本管理中严格适用适当的准则,以便作出准确的诊断并确保最佳的病人护理。
{"title":"Understanding green discoloration in serum and citrate plasma samples: a case report.","authors":"Iva Friščić, Sonja Perkov, Mirjana Mariana Kardum Paro","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.011001","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.011001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report investigates the occurrence of green discoloration in serum and citrate plasma samples collected from a male adult patient following a multivisceral organ transplant. In collected samples, it was necessary to investigate the influence of sample discoloration on the results of laboratory tests and to determine the appropriate approach to sample management. Hematology, coagulation and blood gas analysis showed no flags, but the biochemical lipemia index was susceptible to positive interference, necessitating dilution of the native sample. Despite the green discoloration, both native and diluted samples exhibited minimal interference on routine clinical chemistry analyses, demonstrating the reliability of the laboratory test results. This case report underscores the influence of preanalytical factors on the results of laboratory tests, the need for a thorough assessment of the sample adequacy for laboratory testing and the strict application of appropriate guidelines in the sample management in order to make an accurate diagnosis and ensure optimal patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"011001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654241/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142866906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
National recommendations of the Working Group for Post-analytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine: implementation of autovalidation procedures. 克罗地亚医学生物化学和实验室医学学会后分析工作小组的国家建议:执行自动验证程序。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010503
Vladimira Rimac, Jelena Vlašić Tanasković, Anja Jokić, Lorena Honović, Sonja Podolar, Jasna Leniček Krleža

Autovalidation is a computerised postanalytical tool that uses a sequence of procedures to verify laboratory test results without manual intervention. The Working Group for Post-analytics of the Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine has prepared procedures for the implementation of autovalidation in routine laboratory work, which complement the existing national recommendations and aim to clarify the procedures of autovalidation. Before implementation, it is necessary to determine the need for the introduction of autovalidation in routine laboratory work, and then appoint the autovalidation team, whose task is to decide in which area of laboratory work autovalidation should be introduced, create the algorithm and supervise the verification of autovalidation. Standard rules included in the algorithm are patient data, messages from the analyzer, values of interference indices, autovalidation range and delta check. All criteria defined in the autovalidation algorithm have to be documented and approved by the laboratory manager. This autovalidation procedure shows the basic rules of autovalidation that can be used by any laboratory in the initial phase. The justification for using autovalidation will depend on the number and complexity of laboratory tests, the size of the laboratory personnel, and the available financial and material resources. Autovalidation avoids the subjective evaluation of laboratory test results as it is based on the same rules and is standardised to a certain extent, which further increases the quality of laboratory test results.

自动验证是一种计算机化的分析后工具,它使用一系列程序来验证实验室测试结果,而无需人工干预。克罗地亚医学生物化学和实验室医学学会后分析工作小组制定了在实验室日常工作中实施自动验证的程序,补充了现有的国家建议,目的是澄清自动验证的程序。在实施之前,需要确定在实验室日常工作中引入自动验证的必要性,然后指定自动验证团队,其任务是决定在实验室工作的哪个领域引入自动验证,创建算法并监督自动验证的验证。算法中包含的标准规则包括患者数据、来自分析仪的消息、干扰指数的值、自动验证范围和delta检查。自动验证算法中定义的所有标准都必须由实验室经理记录并批准。本自动验证程序显示了自动验证的基本规则,可用于任何实验室的初始阶段。使用自动验证的理由将取决于实验室测试的数量和复杂程度,实验室人员的规模,以及可用的财政和物质资源。自动验证避免了对实验室检测结果的主观评价,因为它基于相同的规则,并且在一定程度上是标准化的,从而进一步提高了实验室检测结果的质量。
{"title":"National recommendations of the Working Group for Post-analytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine: implementation of autovalidation procedures.","authors":"Vladimira Rimac, Jelena Vlašić Tanasković, Anja Jokić, Lorena Honović, Sonja Podolar, Jasna Leniček Krleža","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010503","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.010503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autovalidation is a computerised postanalytical tool that uses a sequence of procedures to verify laboratory test results without manual intervention. The Working Group for Post-analytics of the Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine has prepared procedures for the implementation of autovalidation in routine laboratory work, which complement the existing national recommendations and aim to clarify the procedures of autovalidation. Before implementation, it is necessary to determine the need for the introduction of autovalidation in routine laboratory work, and then appoint the autovalidation team, whose task is to decide in which area of laboratory work autovalidation should be introduced, create the algorithm and supervise the verification of autovalidation. Standard rules included in the algorithm are patient data, messages from the analyzer, values of interference indices, autovalidation range and delta check. All criteria defined in the autovalidation algorithm have to be documented and approved by the laboratory manager. This autovalidation procedure shows the basic rules of autovalidation that can be used by any laboratory in the initial phase. The justification for using autovalidation will depend on the number and complexity of laboratory tests, the size of the laboratory personnel, and the available financial and material resources. Autovalidation avoids the subjective evaluation of laboratory test results as it is based on the same rules and is standardised to a certain extent, which further increases the quality of laboratory test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"010503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838716/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143461555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Levothyroxine therapy reduces endocan and total cholesterol concentrations in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. 左旋甲状腺素治疗可降低亚临床甲状腺功能减退患者的内啡肽和总胆固醇浓度。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010703
Tihana Serdar Hiršl, Koraljka Đurić, Marina Čeprnja, Ivana Zec, Marijana Kraljević Šmalcelj, Tomislav Jukić, Tanja Bobetić-Vranić, Anita Somborac-Bačura

Introduction: Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases due to endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis development. The aim of this study was to determine whether the levothyroxine therapy could impact the concentrations of endothelial dysfunction blood markers, namely endothelin-1 (ET-1), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and endocan, in patients with a mild form of SCH (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) ≤ 10 mIU/L).

Materials and methods: In this case-control prospective study, SCH patients and healthy controls were recruited during their regular health examinations. Medical specialists prescribed levothyroxine to SCH patients if necessary. The endothelial dysfunction markers, as well as other biochemical markers, were measured in all subjects at baseline, and after 6 months of levothyroxine treatment following the euthyroidism.

Results: Our study showed higher ADMA (248.00 (168.78-540.20) vs. 166.30 (140.60-243.40) μg/L, P = 0.002), endocan (114.30 (63.45-194.65) vs. 67.26 (50.80-126.10) ng/L, P = 0.004), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) (3.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 0.9 mmol/L, P = 0.043) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL) (3.8 ± 0.7 vs. 4.2 ± 1.0 mmol/L, P = 0.020) concentrations in patients with a mild form of SCH in comparison with healthy subjects. In SCH patients, after 6 months of levothyroxine treatment following the euthyroidism, we observed a significant decrease in endocan (91.47 (61.88-200.03) vs. 97.90 (55.18-154.88) ng/L, P = 0.004), and total cholesterol concentrations (CHOL) (6.2 ± 1.0 vs. 5.8 ± 1.0 mmol/L, P = 0.039).

Conclusions: A mild form of SCH is associated with higher concentrations of endocan, ADMA, LDL and non-HDL. The potential benefits of levothyroxine therapy were shown through the significant decrease of endocan and CHOL concentrations in SCH patients, thus contributing the atherosclerosis prevention.

亚临床甲状腺功能减退症(SCH)是内皮功能障碍和动脉粥样硬化发展导致的心血管疾病的独立危险因素。本研究的目的是确定左旋甲状腺素治疗是否会影响轻度促甲状腺激素(TSH)≤10 mIU/L患者内皮素-1 (ET-1)、不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)和内啡肽的浓度。材料与方法:在本病例对照前瞻性研究中,在定期健康检查中招募SCH患者和健康对照者。医学专家在必要时给SCH患者开左旋甲状腺素。在基线和甲状腺功能亢进后接受左旋甲状腺素治疗6个月后,测量所有受试者的内皮功能障碍标志物以及其他生化标志物。结果:我们的研究显示高ADMA(248.00(168.78 - -540.20)和166.30(140.60 - -243.40)μg / L, P = 0.002), endocan(114.30(63.45 - -194.65)和67.26 (50.80 - -126.10)ng / L, P = 0.004),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)(3.3±0.6和3.7±0.9更易/ L, P = 0.043)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL)(3.8±0.7和4.2±1.0更易/ L, P = 0.020)浓度患者的一种轻微的原理图与健康受试者相比。SCH患者在甲状腺功能亢进后接受左旋甲状腺素治疗6个月后,内啡肽(91.47(61.88-200.03)比97.90 (55.18-154.88)ng/L, P = 0.004)和总胆固醇浓度(CHOL)(6.2±1.0比5.8±1.0 mmol/L, P = 0.039)显著降低。结论:轻度SCH与内啡肽、ADMA、低密度脂蛋白和非高密度脂蛋白浓度升高有关。左旋甲状腺素治疗的潜在益处是通过显著降低SCH患者的endocan和CHOL浓度,从而有助于动脉粥样硬化的预防。
{"title":"Levothyroxine therapy reduces endocan and total cholesterol concentrations in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism.","authors":"Tihana Serdar Hiršl, Koraljka Đurić, Marina Čeprnja, Ivana Zec, Marijana Kraljević Šmalcelj, Tomislav Jukić, Tanja Bobetić-Vranić, Anita Somborac-Bačura","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010703","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.010703","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases due to endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis development. The aim of this study was to determine whether the levothyroxine therapy could impact the concentrations of endothelial dysfunction blood markers, namely endothelin-1 (ET-1), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and endocan, in patients with a mild form of SCH (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) ≤ 10 mIU/L).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this case-control prospective study, SCH patients and healthy controls were recruited during their regular health examinations. Medical specialists prescribed levothyroxine to SCH patients if necessary. The endothelial dysfunction markers, as well as other biochemical markers, were measured in all subjects at baseline, and after 6 months of levothyroxine treatment following the euthyroidism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study showed higher ADMA (248.00 (168.78-540.20) <i>vs</i>. 166.30 (140.60-243.40) μg/L, P = 0.002), endocan (114.30 (63.45-194.65) <i>vs</i>. 67.26 (50.80-126.10) ng/L, P = 0.004), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) (3.3 ± 0.6 <i>vs</i>. 3.7 ± 0.9 mmol/L, P = 0.043) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL) (3.8 ± 0.7 <i>vs</i>. 4.2 ± 1.0 mmol/L, P = 0.020) concentrations in patients with a mild form of SCH in comparison with healthy subjects. In SCH patients, after 6 months of levothyroxine treatment following the euthyroidism, we observed a significant decrease in endocan (91.47 (61.88-200.03) <i>vs</i>. 97.90 (55.18-154.88) ng/L, P = 0.004), and total cholesterol concentrations (CHOL) (6.2 ± 1.0 <i>vs</i>. 5.8 ± 1.0 mmol/L, P = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A mild form of SCH is associated with higher concentrations of endocan, ADMA, LDL and non-HDL. The potential benefits of levothyroxine therapy were shown through the significant decrease of endocan and CHOL concentrations in SCH patients, thus contributing the atherosclerosis prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654239/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142866864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proposal for delta check limits of frequently requested hormones using real-world data. 建议使用实际数据对常用激素进行delta检查。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010704
Sunghwan Shin, Shinae Yu, Sollip Kim, Soo Jin Yoo, Eun-Jung Cho, Jae-Woo Chung

Introduction: Research on delta check limits (DCLs) for hormones is limited, yet some laboratories apply arbitrary DCLs. We aimed to propose DCLs for commonly requested hormones.

Materials and methods: This study analyzed 59,657 paired results for adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, parathyroid hormone (PTH), prolactin, insulin, testosterone, and thyroglobulin from five Korean university hospitals. Delta check limits were established using the absolute delta difference (absDD) and absolute delta percent change (absDPC) with 5% cutoff for inpatients/emergencies (IE), outpatients (O) and both (combined; mean of them). Proportions outside the DCLs were compared across groups.

Results: Using absDD and absDPC, each group's DCLs showed 4.3% to 6.4% of values outside the DCLs, aligning with the 5% cutoff (excluding group IE for insulin, testosterone, and thyroglobulin due to < 1000 data pairs). Delta check limits of absDD differed between groups for ACTH, cortisol, PTH, and prolactin, while for absDPC, differences were seen only for ACTH and prolactin. Cross-validation revealed IE and O groups differed outside DCLs of absDD for ACTH, cortisol, and PTH, but only ACTH with absDPC. Combined DCLs of absDD showed ACTH and cortisol exceeded limits in 7.2% and 9.0% in IE, but only 2.6% and 0.6% in O. With absDPC, ACTH differed (10.4% in IE, 2.8% in O), while cortisol, PTH, and prolactin ranged from 4.0% to 6.1%.

Conclusions: Combined DCLs of absDPC are recommended for cortisol, PTH, and prolactin, while ACTH requires separate DCLs on clinical settings. These DCLs from real-world data provide a foundation for establishing DCLs of hormones in clinical laboratories.

简介:激素的delta检限(dcl)研究有限,但一些实验室使用任意的dcl。我们的目标是为常用的激素提出dcl。材料与方法:本研究分析了国内5所大学医院的促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、皮质醇、甲状旁腺激素(PTH)、催乳素、胰岛素、睾酮和甲状腺球蛋白的59,657对配对结果。Delta检查限是使用绝对Delta差(absDD)和绝对Delta百分比变化(absDPC)建立的,对于住院/急诊患者(IE),门诊患者(O)和两者(合并),有5%的截止;它们的平均值)。各组间比较dcl外的比例。结果:使用absDD和absDPC,每组的dcl在dcl外显示4.3%至6.4%的值,与5%的临界值一致(由于< 1000数据对,不包括IE组的胰岛素、睾酮和甲状腺球蛋白)。absDPC的δ检查限在ACTH、皮质醇、PTH和催乳素组间存在差异,而absDPC的δ检查限仅在ACTH和催乳素组间存在差异。交叉验证显示IE组和O组在abdd的dcl外ACTH、皮质醇和PTH存在差异,但只有ACTH与absDPC存在差异。合并absDPC的dcl显示,ACTH和皮质醇在IE中分别超标7.2%和9.0%,但在O中仅超标2.6%和0.6%。与absDPC相比,ACTH差异较大(IE为10.4%,O为2.8%),而皮质醇、PTH和催乳素在4.0%至6.1%之间。结论:对于皮质醇、甲状旁腺激素和催乳素,推荐联合使用absDPC的dcl,而ACTH在临床需要单独使用dcl。这些来自真实世界数据的dcl为临床实验室建立激素dcl提供了基础。
{"title":"Proposal for delta check limits of frequently requested hormones using real-world data.","authors":"Sunghwan Shin, Shinae Yu, Sollip Kim, Soo Jin Yoo, Eun-Jung Cho, Jae-Woo Chung","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010704","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.010704","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research on delta check limits (DCLs) for hormones is limited, yet some laboratories apply arbitrary DCLs. We aimed to propose DCLs for commonly requested hormones.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study analyzed 59,657 paired results for adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, parathyroid hormone (PTH), prolactin, insulin, testosterone, and thyroglobulin from five Korean university hospitals. Delta check limits were established using the absolute delta difference (absDD) and absolute delta percent change (absDPC) with 5% cutoff for inpatients/emergencies (IE), outpatients (O) and both (combined; mean of them). Proportions outside the DCLs were compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using absDD and absDPC, each group's DCLs showed 4.3% to 6.4% of values outside the DCLs, aligning with the 5% cutoff (excluding group IE for insulin, testosterone, and thyroglobulin due to < 1000 data pairs). Delta check limits of absDD differed between groups for ACTH, cortisol, PTH, and prolactin, while for absDPC, differences were seen only for ACTH and prolactin. Cross-validation revealed IE and O groups differed outside DCLs of absDD for ACTH, cortisol, and PTH, but only ACTH with absDPC. Combined DCLs of absDD showed ACTH and cortisol exceeded limits in 7.2% and 9.0% in IE, but only 2.6% and 0.6% in O. With absDPC, ACTH differed (10.4% in IE, 2.8% in O), while cortisol, PTH, and prolactin ranged from 4.0% to 6.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined DCLs of absDPC are recommended for cortisol, PTH, and prolactin, while ACTH requires separate DCLs on clinical settings. These DCLs from real-world data provide a foundation for establishing DCLs of hormones in clinical laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"010704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838720/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143461556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of new Westgard rules suggested by the Westgard Advisor software for five immunological parameters. 实施 Westgard Advisor 软件针对五项免疫参数提出的新 Westgard 规则。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010701
Lisa Cristelli, Francesca Occhipinti, Daniel Tumiatti, De Luisi Antonia, Erika Jani, Massimo Daves

Introduction: Knowledge and systematic evaluation of analytical errors is the task of internal analytical quality control management. The aim of this study was to assess whether the Westgard rules proposed by Bio-Rad's Westgard Advisor software are more efficient in the monitoring of analytical performance than those previously in use.

Materials and methods: The study was carried out on the nephelometer Atellica NEPH630 (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Five parameters were chosen: serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), alpha 1 - antitrypsin (AAT), prealbumin, lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and ceruloplasmin. The study was divided into 4 phases (A, B, C, D): phase A - old rules used (13s, R4s and 22s); phase B - first introduction of new rules (30 days), (13s/22s for IgA; 13s/22s/R4s/41s/10x for the remaining parameters); Phase C - second intervention (after 60 days) 13s/22s/R4s/41s for IgA and Lp(a), 13s/22s/R4s/41s/8x for prealbumin and ceruloplasmin and 13s/22s/R4s/41s/10x for AAT; and Phase D - values at the end of the study (13s for IgA, 13s/22s/32s/R4s/31s/12x for AAT and ceruloplasmin, 13s/22s/R4s/41s/8x for prealbumin and 13s/22s/R4s/41s/10x for Lp(a).

Results: At the end of the study the coefficient of variation (CV%), bias (%) and sigma for IgA were 2.55%, - 1.09% and 5.33, respectively; for AAT 3.88, - 2.21 and 3.25; for prealbumin 3.99, - 0.14 and 2.95; for Lp(a) 8.02, - 0.34 and 3.81; for ceruloplasmin 2.48, - 3.65 and 3.49.

Conclusions: By using newly suggested rejection rules, we did not observe an improvement in monitoring of analytical performance.

对分析误差的认识和系统评价是内部分析质量控制管理的任务。本研究的目的是评估由Bio-Rad的Westgard Advisor软件提出的Westgard规则是否比以前使用的规则在监测分析性能方面更有效。材料与方法:采用Atellica NEPH630浊度计(Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany)。选取血清免疫球蛋白A (IgA)、α - 1 -抗胰蛋白酶(AAT)、前白蛋白、脂蛋白(A) (Lp(A))和铜蓝蛋白5个参数。研究分为4个阶段(A, B, C, D): A阶段-使用旧规则(13s, R4s和22s);阶段B -首次引入新规则(30天),IgA为13秒/22秒;其余参数为13s/22s/R4s/41s/10x);C期-第二次干预(60天后)IgA和Lp的13s/22s/R4s/41s (a),白蛋白和铜蓝蛋白的13s/22s/R4s/41s/8x, AAT的13s/22s/R4s/41s/10x;研究结束时的D期值(IgA为13s, AAT和铜蓝蛋白为13s/22s/32s/R4s/31s/12x,白蛋白前为13s/22s/R4s/41s/8x, Lp为13s/22s/R4s/41s/10x) (a)。结果:研究结束时,IgA的变异系数(CV%)、偏倚(%)和sigma分别为2.55%、- 1.09%和5.33;AAT为3.88、- 2.21和3.25;白蛋白前蛋白为3.99,- 0.14和2.95;Lp(a)为8.02,- 0.34和3.81;对于铜蓝蛋白2.48,- 3.65和3.49。结论:通过使用新建议的拒绝规则,我们没有观察到分析性能监测的改善。
{"title":"Implementation of new Westgard rules suggested by the Westgard Advisor software for five immunological parameters.","authors":"Lisa Cristelli, Francesca Occhipinti, Daniel Tumiatti, De Luisi Antonia, Erika Jani, Massimo Daves","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010701","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.010701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Knowledge and systematic evaluation of analytical errors is the task of internal analytical quality control management. The aim of this study was to assess whether the Westgard rules proposed by Bio-Rad's Westgard Advisor software are more efficient in the monitoring of analytical performance than those previously in use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out on the nephelometer Atellica NEPH630 (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Five parameters were chosen: serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), alpha 1 - antitrypsin (AAT), prealbumin, lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and ceruloplasmin. The study was divided into 4 phases (A, B, C, D): phase A - old rules used (1<sub>3s</sub>, R<sub>4s</sub> and 2<sub>2s</sub>); phase B - first introduction of new rules (30 days), (1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub> for IgA; 1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub>/R<sub>4s</sub>/4<sub>1s</sub>/10<sub>x</sub> for the remaining parameters); Phase C - second intervention (after 60 days) 1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub>/R<sub>4s</sub>/4<sub>1s</sub> for IgA and Lp(a), 1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub>/R<sub>4s</sub>/4<sub>1s</sub>/8<sub>x</sub> for prealbumin and ceruloplasmin and 1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub>/R<sub>4s</sub>/4<sub>1s</sub>/10<sub>x</sub> for AAT; and Phase D - values at the end of the study (1<sub>3s</sub> for IgA, 1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub>/3<sub>2s</sub>/R<sub>4s</sub>/3<sub>1s</sub>/12<sub>x</sub> for AAT and ceruloplasmin, 1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub>/R<sub>4s</sub>/4<sub>1s</sub>/8<sub>x</sub> for prealbumin and 1<sub>3s</sub>/2<sub>2s</sub>/R<sub>4s</sub>/4<sub>1s</sub>/10<sub>x</sub> for Lp(a).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the study the coefficient of variation (CV%), bias (%) and sigma for IgA were 2.55%, - 1.09% and 5.33, respectively; for AAT 3.88, - 2.21 and 3.25; for prealbumin 3.99, - 0.14 and 2.95; for Lp(a) 8.02, - 0.34 and 3.81; for ceruloplasmin 2.48, - 3.65 and 3.49.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By using newly suggested rejection rules, we did not observe an improvement in monitoring of analytical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"010701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142866772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Automated urine analyzers: a comparative study of Atellica UAS 800 and UAS 60 with risk analysis. 自动尿液分析仪:Atellica UAS 800和UAS 60风险分析的比较研究。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010707
Anita Radman, Adriana Unić, Marijana Miler, Lara Milevoj Kopčinović, Alen Vrtarić, Marija Božović, Nora Nikolac Gabaj

Introduction: This study compared analytical and technical performance of Atellica UAS 800 and UAS 60 and assessed potential patient risks if results were not reviewed by laboratory personnel.

Materials and methods: The study included 463 urine samples collected from February to March 2024, analyzed on both analyzers within 2 hours by two laboratory operators. Results from the UAS 800, recorded after operator review, were considered as the reference and compared to UAS 60 results obtained before and after review. Data were evaluated using weighted kappa (kappa ≥ 0.6 considered acceptable). Technical comparison was based on operator assessment. For risk analysis 23 errors and four severity levels were defined.

Results: After automatic image evaluation strong agreement was observed for calcium oxalate and yeasts (kappa: 0.83, 0.94), moderate agreement for red and white blood cells and epithelial cells (kappa: 0.75, 0.78, 0.75), weak agreement for bacteria, mucus and non-squamous epithelial cells (kappa: 0.57, 0.59, 0.40), and poorest agreement for hyaline and pathological casts and total crystals (kappa: 0.23, 0.07, 0.36). After review, kappa was acceptable for all parameters. Risk analysis identified 15 errors, with unrecognized total crystals and mucus being the most frequent (30.0%, 17.1%). Three errors were classified as intermediate risk (missing to report total crystal +1, mucus +1 and pathological casts ≥ +1), with none in high risk area. UAS 800 offers higher throughput and automatic sample aspiration, while UAS 60 uses manual aspiration.

Conclusions: Atellica UAS 60 provides results comparable to UAS 800, quality of reported results remaining uncompromised even without operator review. It is suitable for low- to mid-volume laboratories and can serve as a backup in larger laboratories.

本研究比较了Atellica UAS 800和UAS 60的分析性能和技术性能,并评估了未经实验室人员审查的结果对患者的潜在风险。材料和方法:该研究包括从2024年2月至3月收集的463份尿液样本,由两名实验室操作员在2小时内在两台分析仪上进行分析。操作员审查后记录的UAS 800的结果被视为参考,并与审查前后获得的UAS 60结果进行比较。使用加权kappa对数据进行评估(kappa≥0.6认为可接受)。技术比较是基于操作者的评价。对于风险分析,定义了23个错误和4个严重级别。结果:在自动图像评估后,草酸钙和酵母的一致性很强(kappa: 0.83, 0.94),红细胞和白细胞和上皮细胞的一致性中等(kappa: 0.75, 0.78, 0.75),细菌,粘液和非鳞状上皮细胞的一致性较弱(kappa: 0.57, 0.59, 0.40),透明和病理型模和总晶体的一致性最差(kappa: 0.23, 0.07, 0.36)。经过审查,kappa对所有参数都是可接受的。风险分析确定了15个错误,未识别的总晶体和粘液是最常见的(30.0%,17.1%)。3例错误为中危(漏报总结晶+1、粘液+1、病理铸型≥+1),高危区无错误。UAS 800提供更高的吞吐量和自动取样,而UAS 60使用手动取样。结论:Atellica UAS 60提供了与UAS 800相当的结果,即使没有操作员审查,报告结果的质量也没有受到影响。它适用于低到中等容量的实验室,也可以作为大型实验室的备份。
{"title":"Automated urine analyzers: a comparative study of Atellica UAS 800 and UAS 60 with risk analysis.","authors":"Anita Radman, Adriana Unić, Marijana Miler, Lara Milevoj Kopčinović, Alen Vrtarić, Marija Božović, Nora Nikolac Gabaj","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010707","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.010707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study compared analytical and technical performance of Atellica UAS 800 and UAS 60 and assessed potential patient risks if results were not reviewed by laboratory personnel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 463 urine samples collected from February to March 2024, analyzed on both analyzers within 2 hours by two laboratory operators. Results from the UAS 800, recorded after operator review, were considered as the reference and compared to UAS 60 results obtained before and after review. Data were evaluated using weighted kappa (kappa ≥ 0.6 considered acceptable). Technical comparison was based on operator assessment. For risk analysis 23 errors and four severity levels were defined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After automatic image evaluation strong agreement was observed for calcium oxalate and yeasts (kappa: 0.83, 0.94), moderate agreement for red and white blood cells and epithelial cells (kappa: 0.75, 0.78, 0.75), weak agreement for bacteria, mucus and non-squamous epithelial cells (kappa: 0.57, 0.59, 0.40), and poorest agreement for hyaline and pathological casts and total crystals (kappa: 0.23, 0.07, 0.36). After review, kappa was acceptable for all parameters. Risk analysis identified 15 errors, with unrecognized total crystals and mucus being the most frequent (30.0%, 17.1%). Three errors were classified as intermediate risk (missing to report total crystal +1, mucus +1 and pathological casts ≥ +1), with none in high risk area. UAS 800 offers higher throughput and automatic sample aspiration, while UAS 60 uses manual aspiration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atellica UAS 60 provides results comparable to UAS 800, quality of reported results remaining uncompromised even without operator review. It is suitable for low- to mid-volume laboratories and can serve as a backup in larger laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"010707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143461550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biological variation of thyroid stimulating hormone, free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine in healthy subjects in Turkey. 土耳其健康人促甲状腺激素、游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸和游离甲状腺素的生物学变异。
Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010706
Raziye Yıldız, Hayat Özkanay, Fatma Demet Arslan, Mehmet Köseoğlu

Introduction: Biological variation (BV) data are necessary for interpretation of test results and assessment of analytical performance. We aimed to determine the BV estimates for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (fT3) and free thyroxine(fT4) in healthy subjects in Turkey and compare them with the literature findings.

Materials and methods: A total of 21 Turkish healthy volunteers (12 males and 9 females) were included in the study. Blood samples were collected once a week for five weeks, and the analysis was performed using the chemiluminescent immunoassay method on an Advia Centaur XP (Siemens Diagnostic, Tarrytown, USA). Analytical variation (CVA), within-subject BV (CVI) and between-subject BV (CVG) were calculated. Analytical goals, individuality index (II) and reference change value (RCV) were derived from these data. Statistical analysis was performed using BioVar: BV analysis tool v.1.0.

Results: For TSH, fT3 and fT4, CVA (confidence interval, CI) were 3.3% (2.9 to 3.8), 1.7% (1.5 to 1.9) and 2.7% (2.4 to 3.1); CVI (CI) were 22.3% (19.3 to 26.3), 4.4% (3.8 to 5.3) and 5.1% (4.3 to 6.1); CVG (CI) were 26.6% (19.2 to 39.8), 9.2% (6.9 to 13.6) and 8.2% (6.1 to 12.1), respectively. For TSH, fT3 and fT4, desirable total errors were 27.1%, 6.2% and 6.6%; II values were calculated as 0.84, 0.48 and 0.61; and RCV% values (decrease; increase) were - 40.3;67.6, - 10.4;11.6 and - 12.7;14.5, respectively.

Conclusions: Our study provides updated BV data for thyroid function tests (TFTs) in healthy subjects in Turkey. As TFTs have shown a high degree of individuality, RCV should be preferred rather than population-based reference ranges in the assessment of serum concentrations. Our BV estimates were compatible with European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) BV meta-analysis data obtained using different immunoassay methods in different populations.

生物变异(BV)数据是解释检测结果和评估分析性能所必需的。我们的目的是确定土耳其健康受试者对促甲状腺激素(TSH)、游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(fT3)和游离甲状腺素(fT4)的BV估计,并将其与文献结果进行比较。材料与方法:共纳入21名土耳其健康志愿者,其中男性12人,女性9人。每周采集一次血液样本,持续5周,在Advia Centaur XP (Siemens Diagnostic, Tarrytown, USA)上使用化学发光免疫分析法进行分析。计算分析变异(CVA)、受试者内BV (CVI)和受试者间BV (CVG)。分析目标、个性指数(II)和参考变化值(RCV)由这些数据得出。采用BioVar: BV分析工具v.1.0进行统计分析。结果:TSH、fT3和fT4的CVA(置信区间CI)分别为3.3%(2.9 ~ 3.8)、1.7%(1.5 ~ 1.9)和2.7% (2.4 ~ 3.1);CVI (CI)分别为22.3%(19.3 ~ 26.3)、4.4%(3.8 ~ 5.3)和5.1% (4.3 ~ 6.1);CVG (CI)分别为26.6%(19.2 ~ 39.8)、9.2%(6.9 ~ 13.6)和8.2%(6.1 ~ 12.1)。TSH、fT3和fT4的理想总误差分别为27.1%、6.2%和6.6%;II值分别为0.84、0.48和0.61;和RCV%值(减小;分别为- 40.3、67.6、- 10.4、11.6、- 12.7、14.5。结论:我们的研究为土耳其健康受试者的甲状腺功能检查(TFTs)提供了最新的BV数据。由于TFTs表现出高度的个体化,在评估血清浓度时应首选RCV,而不是基于人群的参考范围。我们的BV估计值与欧洲临床化学和检验医学联合会(EFLM) BV荟萃分析数据一致,这些数据使用不同的免疫测定方法在不同人群中获得。
{"title":"Biological variation of thyroid stimulating hormone, free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine in healthy subjects in Turkey.","authors":"Raziye Yıldız, Hayat Özkanay, Fatma Demet Arslan, Mehmet Köseoğlu","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010706","DOIUrl":"10.11613/BM.2025.010706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biological variation (BV) data are necessary for interpretation of test results and assessment of analytical performance. We aimed to determine the BV estimates for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (fT3) and free thyroxine(fT4) in healthy subjects in Turkey and compare them with the literature findings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 21 Turkish healthy volunteers (12 males and 9 females) were included in the study. Blood samples were collected once a week for five weeks, and the analysis was performed using the chemiluminescent immunoassay method on an Advia Centaur XP (Siemens Diagnostic, Tarrytown, USA). Analytical variation (CV<sub>A</sub>), within-subject BV (CV<sub>I</sub>) and between-subject BV (CV<sub>G</sub>) were calculated. Analytical goals, individuality index (II) and reference change value (RCV) were derived from these data. Statistical analysis was performed using BioVar: BV analysis tool v.1.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For TSH, fT3 and fT4, CV<sub>A</sub> (confidence interval, CI) were 3.3% (2.9 to 3.8), 1.7% (1.5 to 1.9) and 2.7% (2.4 to 3.1); CV<sub>I</sub> (CI) were 22.3% (19.3 to 26.3), 4.4% (3.8 to 5.3) and 5.1% (4.3 to 6.1); CV<sub>G</sub> (CI) were 26.6% (19.2 to 39.8), 9.2% (6.9 to 13.6) and 8.2% (6.1 to 12.1), respectively. For TSH, fT3 and fT4, desirable total errors were 27.1%, 6.2% and 6.6%; II values were calculated as 0.84, 0.48 and 0.61; and RCV% values (decrease; increase) were - 40.3;67.6, - 10.4;11.6 and - 12.7;14.5, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides updated BV data for thyroid function tests (TFTs) in healthy subjects in Turkey. As TFTs have shown a high degree of individuality, RCV should be preferred rather than population-based reference ranges in the assessment of serum concentrations. Our BV estimates were compatible with European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) BV meta-analysis data obtained using different immunoassay methods in different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"010706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838713/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143461551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Biochemia medica
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1