Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-pr007
Silvia Coma, Brandon L. Mouery, Ryan D. Mouery, Clint A. Stalnecker, Fusheng Zhou, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der, Jonathan A. Pachter
KRAS G12D is the most prevalent KRAS mutation in human cancers, mutated in 40%, 15%, and 5% of pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers, respectively. VS-7375 (GFH375) is an oral, selective KRAS G12D dual ON/OFF inhibitor exhibiting extremely high affinity (KD = 12-18 pM) and long residence time (18-24 hours) for the ON and OFF states of human KRAS G12D. In KRAS G12D-mutated (mt) xenograft models representing pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers, VS-7375 has shown potent single agent anti-tumor efficacy with oral dosing. To assess potential benefits of dual ON/OFF inhibition relative to ON-only RAS inhibitors, we compared VS-7375 relative to the KRAS G12D-ON inhibitor zoldonrasib (RMC-9805) in tumor cell signaling assays. In KRAS G12D mt cells in vitro, VS-7375 strongly reduced pERK at concentrations as low as 1 nM at 4 hours and was durable through 48 hours. In contrast, substantial inhibition of pERK by the KRAS G12D-ON inhibitor zoldonrasib (RMC-9805) was not evident until 24 hours and required 30-fold higher concentration. Additionally, 1 nM of VS-7375 durably suppressed pAKT, pS6 and MYC signaling, while suppression of these markers by zoldonrasib required higher concentrations. We further compared efficacy of VS-7375 relative to zoldonrasib and the pan-RAS ON-only inhibitor daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in KRAS G12D mt in vivo models. In the KP4 KRAS G12D mt pancreatic cancer model, VS-7375 showed similar initial tumor regression relative to zoldonrasib and daraxonrasib. However, by approximately 20 days of dosing with continuous dosing of all agents, zoldonrasib and daraxonrasib progressively lost their anti-tumor activity with associated tumor outgrowth (mean tumor volume >850 mm3 by day 30) in contrast to those treated with VS-7375 which showed sustained tumor regression (mean tumor volume ∼80 mm3 by day 30). Accordingly, pharmacodynamic analysis with pathway-specific gene signatures showed that whereas all three KRAS inhibitors inhibited ERK, MYC and PI3K signaling at day 6, only the G12D ON/OFF inhibitor VS-7375 maintained inhibition of these signaling pathways by day 20. VS-7375 also showed deeper tumor regression compared to these RAS ON-only inhibitors in KRAS G12D mt lung and colorectal xenograft models. Additionally, we assessed combination of VS-7375 with other targeted agents. In KRAS G12D mt colorectal models, the combination of VS-7375 with cetuximab induced strong tumor growth inhibition. Furthermore, in the KP4 pancreatic cancer model (KRAS G12D mt; MTAP deleted), while VS-7375 single agent induced strong tumor regression lasting through day 40, the combination of VS-7375 with a PRMT5 inhibitor induced strong tumor regression lasting through 100 days of dosing. VS-7375 is currently undergoing clinical evaluation as monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab, chemotherapy, or chemotherapy + pembrolizumab for patients with KRAS G12D-mutated cancers in the US (VS-7375-101; NCT07020221) and in China (NCT06500676). Citation
KRAS G12D是人类癌症中最普遍的KRAS突变,分别在40%、15%和5%的胰腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌中发生突变。VS-7375 (GFH375)是一种口服选择性KRAS G12D双开/关抑制剂,具有极高的亲和力(KD = 12-18 pM)和对人KRAS G12D开/关状态的长停留时间(18-24小时)。在代表胰腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌的KRAS g12d突变(mt)异种移植模型中,VS-7375在口服剂量下显示出强大的单药抗肿瘤疗效。为了评估双重ON/OFF抑制相对于ON-only RAS抑制剂的潜在益处,我们比较了VS-7375与KRAS G12D-ON抑制剂zoldonrasib (rmmc -9805)在肿瘤细胞信号分析中的作用。在体外KRAS G12D mt细胞中,VS-7375在低至1 nM的浓度下,在4小时内强烈降低pERK,并持续48小时。相比之下,KRAS G12D-ON抑制剂zoldonrasib (RMC-9805)对pERK的实质性抑制直到24小时才明显,并且需要30倍的浓度。此外,1 nM的VS-7375持续抑制pAKT、pS6和MYC信号,而zoldonrasib对这些标记物的抑制需要更高的浓度。我们进一步比较了VS-7375在KRAS G12D mt体内模型中相对于zoldonrasib和pan-RAS ON-only抑制剂daraxonrasib (rmmc -6236)的疗效。在KP4 KRAS G12D mt胰腺癌模型中,VS-7375相对于唑多拉西布和daraxonrasib表现出相似的初始肿瘤消退。然而,在所有药物连续给药约20天后,zoldonrasib和daraxonrasib逐渐失去了抗肿瘤活性,并伴有相关的肿瘤生长(到第30天平均肿瘤体积为850 mm3),而接受VS-7375治疗的患者则显示出持续的肿瘤消退(到第30天平均肿瘤体积为80 mm3)。因此,具有途径特异性基因特征的药效学分析显示,尽管所有三种KRAS抑制剂在第6天抑制ERK, MYC和PI3K信号通路,但只有G12D ON/OFF抑制剂VS-7375在第20天保持对这些信号通路的抑制作用。在KRAS G12D肺和结直肠癌异种移植模型中,VS-7375比这些RAS ON-only抑制剂显示出更深的肿瘤消退。此外,我们评估了VS-7375与其他靶向药物的联合使用。在KRAS G12D mt结直肠癌模型中,VS-7375联合西妥昔单抗对肿瘤生长有较强的抑制作用。此外,在KP4胰腺癌模型(KRAS G12D mt; MTAP缺失)中,VS-7375单药可诱导持续40天的强肿瘤消退,VS-7375联合PRMT5抑制剂可诱导持续100天的强肿瘤消退。VS-7375目前正在美国(VS-7375-101; NCT07020221)和中国(NCT06500676)接受KRAS g12d突变癌症患者的单药治疗和联合西妥昔单抗、化疗或化疗+派姆单抗的临床评估。引用格式:Silvia Coma, Brandon L. Mouery, Ryan D. Mouery, Clint A. Stalnecker, Fusheng Zhou, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der, Jonathan A. Pachter。选择性口服KRAS G12D双开/关抑制剂VS-7375单用及联用靶向药物的抗肿瘤疗效[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:RAS肿瘤发生和治疗;2026年3月5-8日;费城(PA): AACR;巨蟹座Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr PR007。
{"title":"Abstract PR007: Anti-tumor efficacy of the selective oral KRAS G12D dual ON/OFF inhibitor VS-7375 as a single agent and in combination with targeted agents","authors":"Silvia Coma, Brandon L. Mouery, Ryan D. Mouery, Clint A. Stalnecker, Fusheng Zhou, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der, Jonathan A. Pachter","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-pr007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-pr007","url":null,"abstract":"KRAS G12D is the most prevalent KRAS mutation in human cancers, mutated in 40%, 15%, and 5% of pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers, respectively. VS-7375 (GFH375) is an oral, selective KRAS G12D dual ON/OFF inhibitor exhibiting extremely high affinity (KD = 12-18 pM) and long residence time (18-24 hours) for the ON and OFF states of human KRAS G12D. In KRAS G12D-mutated (mt) xenograft models representing pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers, VS-7375 has shown potent single agent anti-tumor efficacy with oral dosing. To assess potential benefits of dual ON/OFF inhibition relative to ON-only RAS inhibitors, we compared VS-7375 relative to the KRAS G12D-ON inhibitor zoldonrasib (RMC-9805) in tumor cell signaling assays. In KRAS G12D mt cells in vitro, VS-7375 strongly reduced pERK at concentrations as low as 1 nM at 4 hours and was durable through 48 hours. In contrast, substantial inhibition of pERK by the KRAS G12D-ON inhibitor zoldonrasib (RMC-9805) was not evident until 24 hours and required 30-fold higher concentration. Additionally, 1 nM of VS-7375 durably suppressed pAKT, pS6 and MYC signaling, while suppression of these markers by zoldonrasib required higher concentrations. We further compared efficacy of VS-7375 relative to zoldonrasib and the pan-RAS ON-only inhibitor daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in KRAS G12D mt in vivo models. In the KP4 KRAS G12D mt pancreatic cancer model, VS-7375 showed similar initial tumor regression relative to zoldonrasib and daraxonrasib. However, by approximately 20 days of dosing with continuous dosing of all agents, zoldonrasib and daraxonrasib progressively lost their anti-tumor activity with associated tumor outgrowth (mean tumor volume >850 mm3 by day 30) in contrast to those treated with VS-7375 which showed sustained tumor regression (mean tumor volume ∼80 mm3 by day 30). Accordingly, pharmacodynamic analysis with pathway-specific gene signatures showed that whereas all three KRAS inhibitors inhibited ERK, MYC and PI3K signaling at day 6, only the G12D ON/OFF inhibitor VS-7375 maintained inhibition of these signaling pathways by day 20. VS-7375 also showed deeper tumor regression compared to these RAS ON-only inhibitors in KRAS G12D mt lung and colorectal xenograft models. Additionally, we assessed combination of VS-7375 with other targeted agents. In KRAS G12D mt colorectal models, the combination of VS-7375 with cetuximab induced strong tumor growth inhibition. Furthermore, in the KP4 pancreatic cancer model (KRAS G12D mt; MTAP deleted), while VS-7375 single agent induced strong tumor regression lasting through day 40, the combination of VS-7375 with a PRMT5 inhibitor induced strong tumor regression lasting through 100 days of dosing. VS-7375 is currently undergoing clinical evaluation as monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab, chemotherapy, or chemotherapy + pembrolizumab for patients with KRAS G12D-mutated cancers in the US (VS-7375-101; NCT07020221) and in China (NCT06500676). Citation","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"63 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a017
Lorenzo Tomassoni, Alvaro Curiel-Garcia, Harika Gundlapalli, Melina Chen, Urszula Wasko-Kornberg, Ximo Pechuan-Jorge, Rashi Raghulan, Yongxian Zhuang, Kevin Contrepois, Steven A. Sastra, Carmine F. Palermo, Ida Aronchik, Jingjing Jiang, Andrea Califano, Mallika Singh, Kenneth P. Olive
Multiple studies have demonstrated preclinical activity of RAS inhibitors in models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and early results from ongoing clinical trials show promise. Following our earlier work using RMC-7977 (a preclinical tool compound related to the investigational RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor daraxonrasib) in a broad range of preclinical models, we elected to study the impact of RAS(ON) inhibition and standard-of-care (SOC) cytotoxic chemotherapies on the heterogeneity of malignant cells in PDAC. We performed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) on over three dozen PDAC tumors from the KPC genetically engineered mouse model, using different treatments and timepoints, yielding over a quarter million high quality single cell expression profiles. Consistent with prior studies, we found that RMC-7977 preferentially depleted more poorly differentiated malignant cells from KPC pancreatic tumors by one week of treatment. Residual malignant cells were well differentiated and showed hyperactivation of distinct sets of gastrointestinal and pancreatic progenitor transcription factors. Spatial transcriptomics on the same KPC tumors validated these findings and elucidated clear histological associations with RAS inhibitor treatment. This phenotype was also validated in human tissue explant models using surrogate immunohistochemical markers of cell states. We then decided to investigate the molecular, cellular, and preclinical consequences of combining RAS(ON)-Multi inhibitors with SOC chemotherapy agents. We first employed the well-validated OncoTreat algorithm to predict which PDAC malignant cells may be most susceptible to different SOC agents. Strikingly, we found that nearly all SOC agents were inferred to preferentially target more well-differentiated malignant cells. Indeed, we found that treatment of tumor-bearing KPC mice with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP) led to a depletion of well-differentiated malignant cell states, as measured by single cell regulatory network analysis. This led us to hypothesize that combining RAS inhibition with SOC agents might target complementary sets of malignant cell states, forming a rational basis for combining these agents. Indeed, preclinical intervention studies combining daraxonrasib with GnP showed combinatorial activity in a range of xenograft, syngeneic allograft, and patient-derived xenograft models of PDAC. Ongoing studies in the KPC model system will directly assess the impacts of these combination regimens on malignant PDAC cell states and will directly address the roles of cellular plasticity versus selective cell death in the modulation of cell state in response to RAS inhibition. Together these studies inform the rationale for the combination of RAS(ON) inhibition with cytotoxic chemotherapies in PDAC. Citation Format: Lorenzo Tomassoni, Alvaro Curiel-Garcia, Harika Gundlapalli, Melina Chen, Urszula Wasko-Kornberg, Ximo Pechuan-Jorge, Rashi Raghulan, Yongxian Zhuang, Kevi
多项研究已经证明RAS抑制剂在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)模型中的临床前活性,并且正在进行的临床试验的早期结果显示出希望。根据我们早期在广泛的临床前模型中使用rmmc -7977(一种与正在研究的RAS(ON)多选择性抑制剂daraxonrasib相关的临床前工具化合物)的工作,我们选择研究RAS(ON)抑制和标准护理(SOC)细胞毒性化疗对PDAC恶性细胞异质性的影响。我们对来自KPC基因工程小鼠模型的30多个PDAC肿瘤进行了单细胞RNA测序(scRNAseq),使用不同的处理方法和时间点,产生了超过25万个高质量的单细胞表达谱。与先前的研究一致,我们发现rmmc -7977在治疗一周后优先清除KPC胰腺肿瘤中分化较差的恶性细胞。残留的恶性细胞分化良好,并表现出不同的胃肠道和胰腺祖细胞转录因子的过度激活。相同KPC肿瘤的空间转录组学证实了这些发现,并阐明了与RAS抑制剂治疗的明确组织学关联。使用细胞状态的替代免疫组织化学标记物在人体组织移植模型中也验证了这种表型。然后,我们决定研究RAS(ON)-Multi抑制剂联合SOC化疗药物的分子、细胞和临床前后果。我们首先使用经过验证的OncoTreat算法来预测哪些PDAC恶性细胞可能对不同的SOC药物最敏感。引人注目的是,我们发现几乎所有的SOC制剂都被推断优先靶向分化程度较高的恶性细胞。事实上,我们发现,通过单细胞调节网络分析,用吉西他滨+ nab-紫杉醇(GnP)治疗荷瘤KPC小鼠导致分化良好的恶性细胞状态的消失。这使我们假设RAS抑制与SOC药物联合可能针对互补组的恶性细胞状态,形成这些药物联合的合理基础。事实上,联合daraxonrasib与GnP的临床前干预研究显示,在一系列异种移植物、同基因异体移植物和患者来源的PDAC异种移植模型中,daraxonrasib具有联合活性。KPC模型系统中正在进行的研究将直接评估这些联合方案对恶性PDAC细胞状态的影响,并将直接解决细胞可塑性与选择性细胞死亡在响应RAS抑制的细胞状态调节中的作用。总之,这些研究为PDAC中RAS(ON)抑制与细胞毒性化疗的结合提供了理论依据。引文格式:Lorenzo Tomassoni, Alvaro curiela - garcia, Harika Gundlapalli, Melina Chen, Urszula Wasko-Kornberg, Ximo Pechuan-Jorge, Rashi Raghulan, Yongxian Zhuang, Kevin Contrepois, Steven A. Sastra, Carmine F. Palermo, Ida Aronchik, jingjingjiang, Andrea Califano, Mallika Singh, Kenneth P. Olive。RAS抑制和细胞毒性化疗靶向胰腺癌的互补细胞状态[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:RAS肿瘤发生和治疗;2026年3月5-8日;费城(PA): AACR;巨蟹座Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr A017。
{"title":"Abstract A017: RAS inhibition and cytotoxic chemotherapy target complementary cell states in pancreatic cancer","authors":"Lorenzo Tomassoni, Alvaro Curiel-Garcia, Harika Gundlapalli, Melina Chen, Urszula Wasko-Kornberg, Ximo Pechuan-Jorge, Rashi Raghulan, Yongxian Zhuang, Kevin Contrepois, Steven A. Sastra, Carmine F. Palermo, Ida Aronchik, Jingjing Jiang, Andrea Califano, Mallika Singh, Kenneth P. Olive","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a017","url":null,"abstract":"Multiple studies have demonstrated preclinical activity of RAS inhibitors in models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and early results from ongoing clinical trials show promise. Following our earlier work using RMC-7977 (a preclinical tool compound related to the investigational RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor daraxonrasib) in a broad range of preclinical models, we elected to study the impact of RAS(ON) inhibition and standard-of-care (SOC) cytotoxic chemotherapies on the heterogeneity of malignant cells in PDAC. We performed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) on over three dozen PDAC tumors from the KPC genetically engineered mouse model, using different treatments and timepoints, yielding over a quarter million high quality single cell expression profiles. Consistent with prior studies, we found that RMC-7977 preferentially depleted more poorly differentiated malignant cells from KPC pancreatic tumors by one week of treatment. Residual malignant cells were well differentiated and showed hyperactivation of distinct sets of gastrointestinal and pancreatic progenitor transcription factors. Spatial transcriptomics on the same KPC tumors validated these findings and elucidated clear histological associations with RAS inhibitor treatment. This phenotype was also validated in human tissue explant models using surrogate immunohistochemical markers of cell states. We then decided to investigate the molecular, cellular, and preclinical consequences of combining RAS(ON)-Multi inhibitors with SOC chemotherapy agents. We first employed the well-validated OncoTreat algorithm to predict which PDAC malignant cells may be most susceptible to different SOC agents. Strikingly, we found that nearly all SOC agents were inferred to preferentially target more well-differentiated malignant cells. Indeed, we found that treatment of tumor-bearing KPC mice with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP) led to a depletion of well-differentiated malignant cell states, as measured by single cell regulatory network analysis. This led us to hypothesize that combining RAS inhibition with SOC agents might target complementary sets of malignant cell states, forming a rational basis for combining these agents. Indeed, preclinical intervention studies combining daraxonrasib with GnP showed combinatorial activity in a range of xenograft, syngeneic allograft, and patient-derived xenograft models of PDAC. Ongoing studies in the KPC model system will directly assess the impacts of these combination regimens on malignant PDAC cell states and will directly address the roles of cellular plasticity versus selective cell death in the modulation of cell state in response to RAS inhibition. Together these studies inform the rationale for the combination of RAS(ON) inhibition with cytotoxic chemotherapies in PDAC. Citation Format: Lorenzo Tomassoni, Alvaro Curiel-Garcia, Harika Gundlapalli, Melina Chen, Urszula Wasko-Kornberg, Ximo Pechuan-Jorge, Rashi Raghulan, Yongxian Zhuang, Kevi","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-b017
Santanu Adhikary, Marco Napoli, Suehelay Acevedo Acevedo, Christina L. Carr, Jaden R. Baldwin, Nicole Hackel, Hitendra S. Solanki, Yaakov E. Stern, LaxmiSwetha Karanam, Duy T. Nguyen, Eric B. Haura, Elsa R. Flores
Therapies targeting mutant KRAS have been a successful strategy for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma (LuAD). The major challenges lie when these tumors acquire resistance to these KRAS inhibitors (KRASi). Recent studies have identified various mechanisms via which these tumors become resistant to the drugs, including histological transition from adeno to squamous cell carcinoma. Genetic mutations in TP53 are one of the leading causes of drug resistance. Mutations in TP53 lead to the inhibition of the tumor and metastasis suppressor TAp63 and stabilization of the oncogenic isoform ΔNp63. In PDAC, it is reported that ΔNp63 drives the adeno to squamous transition. We have previously shown that loss of ΔNp63 in a KRAS G12D-driven LuAD leads to fewer tumors and of lower grade. Here we report that cells and tumors resistant to KRAS G12C inhibitors show elevated levels of ΔNp63 compared to the sensitive cells and tumors. We performed a ChIP-seq assay to identify the molecular targets regulated by ΔNp63 in driving resistance to KRASi. We identified genes involved in pathways like drug resistance, metabolism, cell adhesion, KRAS signaling, cellular mechanics, and GPCRs, that are bound by ΔNp63 in KRASiR cells. Interestingly, we also found enrichment of ΔNp63 at the NRF2 promoter in the resistant cells. The KRASiR cells exhibited increased glycolysis, mitochondrial fission, and a lower mitochondrial membrane potential, which reverted upon loss of ΔNp63. We elucidated that ΔNp63 is crucial for driving resistance to the KRAS G12C inhibitor (AMG510, also known as sotorasib) in vivo via adeno to squamous transition. Loss of ΔNp63 induces apoptosis and resensitizes the resistant tumors to AMG510. We also found that ΔNp63 drives resistance to other RAS inhibitors, including the RAS-MULTI-ON inhibitor (RMC6236). We further showed that ΔNp63 is crucial for driving resistance to AMG510 in genetically engineered mouse models, depending on the mutation status of TP53, and in patients treated with sotorasib. Therefore, targeting ΔNp63 can be a novel approach to overcome the acquired resistance to KRAS inhibitors. Citation Format: Santanu Adhikary, Marco Napoli, Suehelay Acevedo Acevedo, Christina L. Carr, Jaden R. Baldwin, Nicole Hackel, Hitendra S. Solanki, Yaakov E. Stern, LaxmiSwetha Karanam, Duy T. Nguyen, Eric B. Haura, Elsa R. Flores. Mechanisms regulating resistance to KRAS inhibitors driven by ΔNp63 in lung adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr B017.
靶向突变KRAS的治疗已成为治疗肺腺癌(LuAD)的成功策略。主要的挑战在于这些肿瘤何时获得对这些KRAS抑制剂(KRASi)的耐药性。最近的研究已经确定了这些肿瘤对药物产生耐药性的各种机制,包括从腺细胞癌到鳞状细胞癌的组织学转变。TP53基因突变是导致耐药的主要原因之一。TP53的突变导致肿瘤和转移抑制因子TAp63的抑制和致癌亚型ΔNp63的稳定。在PDAC中,据报道ΔNp63驱动腺向鳞状转变。我们之前已经证明,在KRAS g12d驱动的LuAD中,ΔNp63的缺失会导致更少的肿瘤和更低的级别。在这里,我们报告了对KRAS G12C抑制剂耐药的细胞和肿瘤与敏感细胞和肿瘤相比,ΔNp63水平升高。我们进行了ChIP-seq分析,以确定ΔNp63在驱动KRASi抗性中调节的分子靶点。我们确定了KRASiR细胞中与耐药、代谢、细胞粘附、KRAS信号传导、细胞力学和gpcr等途径相关的基因,这些基因通过ΔNp63结合。有趣的是,我们还发现在耐药细胞中NRF2启动子处富集ΔNp63。KRASiR细胞表现出糖酵解增加,线粒体分裂,线粒体膜电位降低,在ΔNp63丢失后恢复。我们阐明ΔNp63在体内通过腺细胞到鳞状细胞的转变驱动对KRAS G12C抑制剂(AMG510,也称为sotorasib)的耐药至关重要。ΔNp63缺失可诱导细胞凋亡并使耐药肿瘤对AMG510重新敏感。我们还发现ΔNp63驱动对其他RAS抑制剂的耐药性,包括RAS- multi - on抑制剂(RMC6236)。我们进一步表明,ΔNp63在基因工程小鼠模型中对于驱动对AMG510的耐药性至关重要,这取决于TP53的突变状态,以及接受sotorasib治疗的患者。因此,靶向ΔNp63可能是一种克服对KRAS抑制剂获得性耐药的新方法。引用格式:Santanu Adhikary, Marco Napoli, Suehelay Acevedo Acevedo, Christina L. Carr, Jaden R. Baldwin, Nicole hackkel, Hitendra S. Solanki, Yaakov E. Stern, LaxmiSwetha Karanam, Duy T. Nguyen, Eric B. Haura, Elsa R. Flores肺腺癌中ΔNp63驱动的KRAS抑制剂耐药调控机制[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:RAS肿瘤发生和治疗;2026年3月5-8日;费城(PA): AACR;巨蟹座Res 2026;86(5_sup_1): nr B017。
{"title":"Abstract B017: Mechanisms regulating resistance to KRAS inhibitors driven by ΔNp63 in lung adenocarcinoma","authors":"Santanu Adhikary, Marco Napoli, Suehelay Acevedo Acevedo, Christina L. Carr, Jaden R. Baldwin, Nicole Hackel, Hitendra S. Solanki, Yaakov E. Stern, LaxmiSwetha Karanam, Duy T. Nguyen, Eric B. Haura, Elsa R. Flores","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-b017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-b017","url":null,"abstract":"Therapies targeting mutant KRAS have been a successful strategy for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma (LuAD). The major challenges lie when these tumors acquire resistance to these KRAS inhibitors (KRASi). Recent studies have identified various mechanisms via which these tumors become resistant to the drugs, including histological transition from adeno to squamous cell carcinoma. Genetic mutations in TP53 are one of the leading causes of drug resistance. Mutations in TP53 lead to the inhibition of the tumor and metastasis suppressor TAp63 and stabilization of the oncogenic isoform ΔNp63. In PDAC, it is reported that ΔNp63 drives the adeno to squamous transition. We have previously shown that loss of ΔNp63 in a KRAS G12D-driven LuAD leads to fewer tumors and of lower grade. Here we report that cells and tumors resistant to KRAS G12C inhibitors show elevated levels of ΔNp63 compared to the sensitive cells and tumors. We performed a ChIP-seq assay to identify the molecular targets regulated by ΔNp63 in driving resistance to KRASi. We identified genes involved in pathways like drug resistance, metabolism, cell adhesion, KRAS signaling, cellular mechanics, and GPCRs, that are bound by ΔNp63 in KRASiR cells. Interestingly, we also found enrichment of ΔNp63 at the NRF2 promoter in the resistant cells. The KRASiR cells exhibited increased glycolysis, mitochondrial fission, and a lower mitochondrial membrane potential, which reverted upon loss of ΔNp63. We elucidated that ΔNp63 is crucial for driving resistance to the KRAS G12C inhibitor (AMG510, also known as sotorasib) in vivo via adeno to squamous transition. Loss of ΔNp63 induces apoptosis and resensitizes the resistant tumors to AMG510. We also found that ΔNp63 drives resistance to other RAS inhibitors, including the RAS-MULTI-ON inhibitor (RMC6236). We further showed that ΔNp63 is crucial for driving resistance to AMG510 in genetically engineered mouse models, depending on the mutation status of TP53, and in patients treated with sotorasib. Therefore, targeting ΔNp63 can be a novel approach to overcome the acquired resistance to KRAS inhibitors. Citation Format: Santanu Adhikary, Marco Napoli, Suehelay Acevedo Acevedo, Christina L. Carr, Jaden R. Baldwin, Nicole Hackel, Hitendra S. Solanki, Yaakov E. Stern, LaxmiSwetha Karanam, Duy T. Nguyen, Eric B. Haura, Elsa R. Flores. Mechanisms regulating resistance to KRAS inhibitors driven by ΔNp63 in lung adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr B017.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Colon adenocarcinoma frequently harbors activating KRAS mutations (∼35–45%), which are associated with aggressive disease, poor prognosis, and resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. Oncogenic KRAS constitutively activates downstream effector signaling, particularly the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK cascade, driving uncontrolled proliferation and survival. As direct targeting of KRAS remains clinically limited, identifying downstream effectors and context-specific vulnerabilities is essential for developing alternative therapeutic strategies. Methods Publicly available colorectal cancer gene expression datasets from GEO were analyzed to identify KRAS-regulated genes through comparisons of KRAS-mutant and wild-type samples. Dependency and expression data from DepMap were used to assess context-specific vulnerabilities. Colorectal cancer cell lines were subjected to lentiviral shRNA-mediated silencing of GJB3 and SLC7A11, individually or in combination, with knockdown confirmed by qPCR and immunoblotting. Proliferation, migration, and anchorage-independent growth were assessed using standard functional assays. RNA sequencing following GJB3 silencing was performed to identify altered stress and metabolic pathways. FRA1 binding to the GJB3 promoter was assessed by ChIP-PCR, and gap junction–mediated cystine transfer was evaluated using metabolite transport assays. AI-based language tools were used to assist with grammar and clarity during manuscript preparation. Results Analysis of GEO datasets identified GJB3 as one of the most strongly upregulated genes in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancers. GJB3 expression positively correlated with KRAS signaling, and mechanistic studies demonstrated direct transcriptional regulation by the KRAS-controlled transcription factor FRA1, establishing GJB3 as a downstream KRAS effector. Functional assays revealed that GJB3 silencing significantly impaired proliferation, migration, and spheroid formation. Transcriptomic profiling following GJB3 depletion showed activation of the integrated stress response, marked by GCN2 signaling, indicating metabolic stress. As GJB3 encodes the gap junction protein connexin-31, we demonstrated that cystine is transferred through CX31-mediated gap junctions. Dependence on this pathway was cell line–specific: GJB3-dependent cells such as SW480 exhibited low expression of the canonical cystine transporter SLC7A11, whereas SLC7A11-high cell lines (HCT116, HT29) were resistant to GJB3 loss. Importantly, dual silencing of GJB3 and SLC7A11 induced a strong synthetic lethal effect in otherwise GJB3-independent cells. Conclusion These findings identify GJB3 as a previously unrecognized KRAS effector that supports colorectal cancer growth through gap junction–mediated cystine uptake. Variable SLC7A11 expression dictates reliance on GJB3, revealing a context-dependent metabolic vulnerability. Targeting the GJB3–SLC7A11 cystine uptake axis represents a potential therapeutic strategy for KRAS-driven colorectal cancers r
{"title":"Abstract A031: A metabolic weak spot: GJB3–SLC7A11 Synthetic lethality in colon cancer","authors":"Disha Acharya, Balkrishna Chaube, Sudhanshu Shukla","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a031","url":null,"abstract":"Colon adenocarcinoma frequently harbors activating KRAS mutations (∼35–45%), which are associated with aggressive disease, poor prognosis, and resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. Oncogenic KRAS constitutively activates downstream effector signaling, particularly the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK cascade, driving uncontrolled proliferation and survival. As direct targeting of KRAS remains clinically limited, identifying downstream effectors and context-specific vulnerabilities is essential for developing alternative therapeutic strategies. Methods Publicly available colorectal cancer gene expression datasets from GEO were analyzed to identify KRAS-regulated genes through comparisons of KRAS-mutant and wild-type samples. Dependency and expression data from DepMap were used to assess context-specific vulnerabilities. Colorectal cancer cell lines were subjected to lentiviral shRNA-mediated silencing of GJB3 and SLC7A11, individually or in combination, with knockdown confirmed by qPCR and immunoblotting. Proliferation, migration, and anchorage-independent growth were assessed using standard functional assays. RNA sequencing following GJB3 silencing was performed to identify altered stress and metabolic pathways. FRA1 binding to the GJB3 promoter was assessed by ChIP-PCR, and gap junction–mediated cystine transfer was evaluated using metabolite transport assays. AI-based language tools were used to assist with grammar and clarity during manuscript preparation. Results Analysis of GEO datasets identified GJB3 as one of the most strongly upregulated genes in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancers. GJB3 expression positively correlated with KRAS signaling, and mechanistic studies demonstrated direct transcriptional regulation by the KRAS-controlled transcription factor FRA1, establishing GJB3 as a downstream KRAS effector. Functional assays revealed that GJB3 silencing significantly impaired proliferation, migration, and spheroid formation. Transcriptomic profiling following GJB3 depletion showed activation of the integrated stress response, marked by GCN2 signaling, indicating metabolic stress. As GJB3 encodes the gap junction protein connexin-31, we demonstrated that cystine is transferred through CX31-mediated gap junctions. Dependence on this pathway was cell line–specific: GJB3-dependent cells such as SW480 exhibited low expression of the canonical cystine transporter SLC7A11, whereas SLC7A11-high cell lines (HCT116, HT29) were resistant to GJB3 loss. Importantly, dual silencing of GJB3 and SLC7A11 induced a strong synthetic lethal effect in otherwise GJB3-independent cells. Conclusion These findings identify GJB3 as a previously unrecognized KRAS effector that supports colorectal cancer growth through gap junction–mediated cystine uptake. Variable SLC7A11 expression dictates reliance on GJB3, revealing a context-dependent metabolic vulnerability. Targeting the GJB3–SLC7A11 cystine uptake axis represents a potential therapeutic strategy for KRAS-driven colorectal cancers r","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a025
Sehbanul Islam
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional molecules bridging a target protein with an E3 ubiquitin ligase, promoting its ubiquitylation and degradation. Unlike traditional inhibitors, PROTACs exploit transient interactions, enabling the selective degradation of “undruggable” proteins, thereby expanding the landscape of druggable targets. However, PROTACs are not without limitations. The “hook effect”—a phenomenon where high PROTAC concentrations reduce efficacy due to inactive binary complex formation—compromises their clinical utility. Additionally, single PROTACs may fail to achieve complete degradation due to insufficient polyubiquitination or suboptimal E3 ligase recruitment, limiting their therapeutic efficacy. These challenges highlight the need for strategies to enhance PROTAC performance and so therapeutic applicability. In this study, we introduce a novel dual-PROTAC strategy that recruits two distinct E3 ligases, such as KEAP1 and VHL, to cooperatively degrade KRAS(G12D) and Androgen Receptor (AR). Our data demonstrate that combining KEAP1- and VHL-recruiting PROTACs synergistically enhances target degradation, reduces the required dosing, and minimizes off-target effects. Notably, KEAP1 recruitment offers the unique advantage to favour polyubiquitin chains elongation, thereby improving proteasomal recognition. In conclusion, dual-targeting approach represents a promising avenue for optimizing PROTAC-based therapeutics. Citation Format: Sehbanul Islam. Unveiling Synergistic Potential of VHL and KEAP1-based PROTACs for Targeted Protein Degradation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr A025.
蛋白水解靶向嵌合体(Proteolysis-targeting chimeras, PROTACs)是一种双功能分子,通过E3泛素连接酶连接靶蛋白,促进其泛素化和降解。与传统抑制剂不同,PROTACs利用瞬时相互作用,使“不可药物”蛋白质的选择性降解成为可能,从而扩大了可药物靶点的范围。然而,protac并非没有限制。“钩效应”——高PROTAC浓度由于无效的二元复合物形成而降低疗效的现象——损害了它们的临床效用。此外,由于多泛素化作用不足或E3连接酶募集不理想,单个PROTACs可能无法实现完全降解,从而限制了其治疗效果。这些挑战突出了提高PROTAC性能和治疗适用性的策略的必要性。在这项研究中,我们引入了一种新的双protac策略,该策略招募了两种不同的E3连接酶,如KEAP1和VHL,共同降解KRAS(G12D)和雄激素受体(AR)。我们的数据表明,结合KEAP1-和vhl -募集的PROTACs可以协同增强靶标降解,减少所需的剂量,并最大限度地减少脱靶效应。值得注意的是,KEAP1的募集提供了独特的优势,有利于多泛素链的延伸,从而改善蛋白酶体的识别。总之,双靶向方法代表了优化基于protac的治疗方法的有希望的途径。引文格式:Sehbanul Islam。揭示基于VHL和keap1的PROTACs在靶向蛋白降解中的协同潜力[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:RAS肿瘤发生和治疗;2026年3月5-8日;费城(PA): AACR;巨蟹座Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr A025。
{"title":"Abstract A025: Unveiling Synergistic Potential of VHL and KEAP1-based PROTACs for Targeted Protein Degradation","authors":"Sehbanul Islam","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a025","url":null,"abstract":"Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional molecules bridging a target protein with an E3 ubiquitin ligase, promoting its ubiquitylation and degradation. Unlike traditional inhibitors, PROTACs exploit transient interactions, enabling the selective degradation of “undruggable” proteins, thereby expanding the landscape of druggable targets. However, PROTACs are not without limitations. The “hook effect”—a phenomenon where high PROTAC concentrations reduce efficacy due to inactive binary complex formation—compromises their clinical utility. Additionally, single PROTACs may fail to achieve complete degradation due to insufficient polyubiquitination or suboptimal E3 ligase recruitment, limiting their therapeutic efficacy. These challenges highlight the need for strategies to enhance PROTAC performance and so therapeutic applicability. In this study, we introduce a novel dual-PROTAC strategy that recruits two distinct E3 ligases, such as KEAP1 and VHL, to cooperatively degrade KRAS(G12D) and Androgen Receptor (AR). Our data demonstrate that combining KEAP1- and VHL-recruiting PROTACs synergistically enhances target degradation, reduces the required dosing, and minimizes off-target effects. Notably, KEAP1 recruitment offers the unique advantage to favour polyubiquitin chains elongation, thereby improving proteasomal recognition. In conclusion, dual-targeting approach represents a promising avenue for optimizing PROTAC-based therapeutics. Citation Format: Sehbanul Islam. Unveiling Synergistic Potential of VHL and KEAP1-based PROTACs for Targeted Protein Degradation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr A025.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a048
Daniel A. Bonsor, Lorenzo I. Finci, Jacob R. Potter, Lucy C. Young, Vanessa E. Wall, Ruby Goldstein de Salazar, Katie R. Geis, Tyler Stephens, Joseph Finney, Dwight V. Nissley, Frank McCormick, Dhirendra K. Simanshu
RAF activation is a critical step in MAPK signaling and requires both RAS engagement and dephosphorylation of a conserved phosphoserine by the SHOC2–RAS–PP1C complex. MRAS forms a high-affinity SHOC2–MRAS–PP1C (SMP) assembly, whereas canonical RAS isoforms (KRAS, HRAS, NRAS) create analogous complexes with lower affinity. Despite this, tumors driven by oncogenic KRAS, HRAS, or NRAS remain highly dependent on SHOC2, indicating that these weaker assemblies are functionally relevant for tumorigenesis. To investigate how canonical RAS proteins assemble into lower-affinity ternary complexes, we determined the cryo-EM structure of the SHOC2–KRAS–PP1C (SKP) complex, stabilized by Noonan syndrome-associated mutations. The SKP complex resembles the SMP architecture but engages fewer contacts and buries less surface area due to the absence of MRAS-specific structural elements that enhance stability. RAS inhibitors MRTX1133 and RMC-6236 reshape Switch-I/II regions, preventing SKP assembly more efficiently than they disrupt preformed complexes, while leaving SMP formation unaffected because they do not target MRAS. Given that MRAS is upregulated in KRAS inhibitor resistance, we characterize an MRAS variant that binds MRTX1133; although capable of forming SMP, its assembly is blocked by the inhibitor, highlighting the potential for dual targeting of SKP and SMP complexes. Collectively, these results reveal isoform-specific determinants of SHOC2–RAS–PP1C formation and provide a rationale for simultaneously inhibiting both SKP and SMP to counter resistance in RAS-driven cancers. Citation Format: Daniel A. Bonsor, Lorenzo I. Finci, Jacob R. Potter, Lucy C. Young, Vanessa E. Wall, Ruby Goldstein de Salazar, Katie R. Geis, Tyler Stephens, Joseph Finney, Dwight V. Nissley, Frank McCormick, Dhirendra K. Simanshu. Structure of SHOC2-KRAS-PP1C complex reveals RAS isoform-specific determinants and insights into targeting complex assembly by RAS inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr A048.
RAF激活是MAPK信号传导的关键步骤,需要RAS参与并通过SHOC2-RAS-PP1C复合物使保守的磷酸丝氨酸去磷酸化。MRAS形成高亲和力的SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C (SMP)组装,而典型的RAS亚型(KRAS, HRAS, NRAS)产生类似的低亲和力复合物。尽管如此,由致癌KRAS、HRAS或NRAS驱动的肿瘤仍然高度依赖于SHOC2,这表明这些较弱的组装在功能上与肿瘤发生相关。为了研究典型RAS蛋白是如何组装成低亲和力三元复合物的,我们确定了由Noonan综合征相关突变稳定的SHOC2-KRAS-PP1C (SKP)复合物的低温电镜结构。SKP复合物类似于SMP结构,但由于缺乏mras特定的结构元件,因此接触较少,埋下的表面积更小,从而提高了稳定性。RAS抑制剂MRTX1133和rmmc -6236重塑Switch-I/II区域,比破坏预先形成的复合物更有效地阻止SKP组装,同时不影响SMP的形成,因为它们不靶向MRAS。鉴于MRAS在KRAS抑制剂耐药性中上调,我们表征了一种结合MRTX1133的MRAS变体;虽然能够形成SMP,但其组装被抑制剂阻断,突出了SKP和SMP复合物双重靶向的潜力。总的来说,这些结果揭示了SHOC2-RAS-PP1C形成的亚型特异性决定因素,并为同时抑制SKP和SMP以对抗ras驱动癌症的耐药性提供了理论依据。引文格式:Daniel A. Bonsor, Lorenzo I. Finci, Jacob R. Potter, Lucy C. Young, Vanessa E. Wall, Ruby Goldstein de Salazar, Katie R. Geis, Tyler Stephens, Joseph Finney, Dwight V. Nissley, Frank McCormick, Dhirendra K. Simanshu。SHOC2-KRAS-PP1C复合物的结构揭示了RAS亚型特异性决定因素和RAS抑制剂靶向复合物组装的见解[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:RAS肿瘤发生和治疗;2026年3月5-8日;费城(PA): AACR;巨蟹座Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr A048。
{"title":"Abstract A048: Structure of SHOC2-KRAS-PP1C complex reveals RAS isoform-specific determinants and insights into targeting complex assembly by RAS inhibitors","authors":"Daniel A. Bonsor, Lorenzo I. Finci, Jacob R. Potter, Lucy C. Young, Vanessa E. Wall, Ruby Goldstein de Salazar, Katie R. Geis, Tyler Stephens, Joseph Finney, Dwight V. Nissley, Frank McCormick, Dhirendra K. Simanshu","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-a048","url":null,"abstract":"RAF activation is a critical step in MAPK signaling and requires both RAS engagement and dephosphorylation of a conserved phosphoserine by the SHOC2–RAS–PP1C complex. MRAS forms a high-affinity SHOC2–MRAS–PP1C (SMP) assembly, whereas canonical RAS isoforms (KRAS, HRAS, NRAS) create analogous complexes with lower affinity. Despite this, tumors driven by oncogenic KRAS, HRAS, or NRAS remain highly dependent on SHOC2, indicating that these weaker assemblies are functionally relevant for tumorigenesis. To investigate how canonical RAS proteins assemble into lower-affinity ternary complexes, we determined the cryo-EM structure of the SHOC2–KRAS–PP1C (SKP) complex, stabilized by Noonan syndrome-associated mutations. The SKP complex resembles the SMP architecture but engages fewer contacts and buries less surface area due to the absence of MRAS-specific structural elements that enhance stability. RAS inhibitors MRTX1133 and RMC-6236 reshape Switch-I/II regions, preventing SKP assembly more efficiently than they disrupt preformed complexes, while leaving SMP formation unaffected because they do not target MRAS. Given that MRAS is upregulated in KRAS inhibitor resistance, we characterize an MRAS variant that binds MRTX1133; although capable of forming SMP, its assembly is blocked by the inhibitor, highlighting the potential for dual targeting of SKP and SMP complexes. Collectively, these results reveal isoform-specific determinants of SHOC2–RAS–PP1C formation and provide a rationale for simultaneously inhibiting both SKP and SMP to counter resistance in RAS-driven cancers. Citation Format: Daniel A. Bonsor, Lorenzo I. Finci, Jacob R. Potter, Lucy C. Young, Vanessa E. Wall, Ruby Goldstein de Salazar, Katie R. Geis, Tyler Stephens, Joseph Finney, Dwight V. Nissley, Frank McCormick, Dhirendra K. Simanshu. Structure of SHOC2-KRAS-PP1C complex reveals RAS isoform-specific determinants and insights into targeting complex assembly by RAS inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr A048.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"200 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-b026
Hitendra S. Solanki, Denis Imbody, Bina Desai, Andriy Marusyk, Eric B. Haura
Emerging data from clinical trials suggests that mechanisms that reactivate the MAPK pathway via gene amplification events can drive resistance to RAS inhibitors. This includes amplification of KRAS itself, as well as RAF1, RICTOR , and MYC. How amplification events affect signaling networks and the implications for therapeutic opportunities to overcome resistance remain unclear. To model this, we employed RMC-7977, a RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor structurally related to the clinical candidate daraxonrasib (RMC-6236), and established a RMC-7977–resistant (RMC-7977-R) H358 isogenic model that exhibit RAF1 amplification, as confirmed by amplicon-level analysis of whole-exome sequencing (WES), western blotting, and RNA sequencing. We evaluated this resistant cell line responses to a panel of RAS pathway–targeting agents, including RAF inhibitors (LXH-254 and exarafenib), MEK1/2 PROTAC degrader (MS934), pan-RAF-MEK non-degrading molecular glue (NST-628), RAF/MEK clamp (avutometinib) and MEK1/2 inhibitor (trametinib). Cell viability analysis demonstrated increased sensitivity of RMC-7977 resistant cells to RAF inhibitors compared to the parent H358. Combinations of MEK-targeting agents with either RAF inhibitors or RMC-7977 more effectively suppressed ERK phosphorylation in resistant cells compared to RAF inhibitors combinations with RMC-7977. However, combining RAF inhibitors with RMC-7977 or MEK-targeting agents (MS934, NST-628, avutometinib, or trametinib) more potently inhibited cell proliferation in resistant cells compared with combinations of RMC-7977 with MEK-targeting agents. In the context of siRNA-mediated RAF1 knockdown in RMC-7977 resistant cell line, trametinib treatment reduced ERK phosphorylation and inhibited cell proliferation more deeply than RMC-7977. This suggested that RAF1 may have additional signaling mechanisms beyond activation of MEK/ERK. To elucidate the mechanistic basis of LXH-254 activity in RAF1-amplified cells, we performed RNA sequencing and transcriptional analyses in cells treated with LXH-254, which revealed enrichment of G2/M checkpoint, MYC target, mitotic spindle, E2F target, and DNA repair signatures. Consistent with these observations, RAF inhibitors induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in RAF1-amplified cells, and the apoptotic response was enhanced when combined with RMC-7977 or MEK-targeting agents. Resistant cells exhibited increased nuclear RAF1 expression compared with parental H358. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal enhanced interactions between RAF1 and the mitotic kinases PLK1 and AURKA in resistant cells. Our data indicates that RAF1 amplification rewires signaling states by affecting nuclear G2/M signaling networks in addition to the MEK/ERK pathway. More broadly, our results suggest that RAF1 gene amplification associated with RAS inhibitor resistance may produce neomorphic signaling states that affect therapeutic sensitivity. Citation Format: Hitendra S. Solanki, Denis Imbody,
来自临床试验的新数据表明,通过基因扩增事件重新激活MAPK通路的机制可以驱动对RAS抑制剂的耐药性。这包括KRAS本身、RAF1、RICTOR和MYC的扩增。扩增事件如何影响信号网络以及对克服耐药性的治疗机会的影响尚不清楚。为了模拟这一点,我们使用RAS(ON)多选择性抑制剂rmmc -7977,与临床候选药物daraxonrasib (rmmc -6236)结构相关,并建立了rmmc -7977- resistant (rmmc -7977- r) H358等基因模型,通过全外显子组测序(WES)、western blotting和RNA测序的扩增子水平分析证实了该模型具有RAF1扩增。我们评估了这种耐药细胞系对一系列RAS通路靶向药物的反应,包括RAF抑制剂(LXH-254和exarafenib)、MEK1/2 PROTAC降解剂(MS934)、pan-RAF-MEK不降解分子胶(NST-628)、RAF/MEK钳(avutometinib)和MEK1/2抑制剂(trametinib)。细胞活力分析表明,与亲本H358相比,rmmc -7977耐药细胞对RAF抑制剂的敏感性增加。与RAF抑制剂与rmmc -7977联合使用相比,mek靶向药物与RAF抑制剂或rmmc -7977联合使用更有效地抑制耐药细胞中的ERK磷酸化。然而,与rmmc -7977与mek靶向药物联合使用相比,RAF抑制剂与rmmc -7977或mek靶向药物(MS934、NST-628、avutometinib或trametinib)联合使用更有效地抑制耐药细胞中的细胞增殖。在RMC-7977耐药细胞系中sirna介导的RAF1敲低的情况下,曲美替尼治疗比rmmc -7977更能降低ERK磷酸化和抑制细胞增殖。这表明RAF1可能具有除MEK/ERK激活外的其他信号传导机制。为了阐明LXH-254在raf1扩增细胞中活性的机制基础,我们对LXH-254处理的细胞进行了RNA测序和转录分析,结果显示G2/M检查点、MYC靶点、有丝分裂纺锤体、E2F靶点和DNA修复特征的富集。与这些观察结果一致,RAF抑制剂在raf1扩增的细胞中诱导G2/M细胞周期阻滞和凋亡,并且当与rmmc -7977或mek靶向药物联合使用时,凋亡反应增强。与亲代H358相比,抗性细胞的核RAF1表达增加。共免疫沉淀实验显示,在耐药细胞中,RAF1与有丝分裂激酶PLK1和AURKA之间的相互作用增强。我们的数据表明,除了MEK/ERK通路外,RAF1扩增还通过影响核G2/M信号网络来改变信号状态。更广泛地说,我们的研究结果表明,与RAS抑制剂耐药性相关的RAF1基因扩增可能产生影响治疗敏感性的新形态信号状态。引文格式:Hitendra S. Solanki, Denis Imbody, Bina Desai, Andriy Marusyk, Eric B. Haura。RAF1基因扩增通过核易位以及与PLK1和Aurora A激酶的相互作用驱动RAS抑制剂耐药性[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:RAS肿瘤发生和治疗;2026年3月5-8日;费城(PA): AACR;巨蟹座Res 2026;86(5_sup_1): nr B026。
{"title":"Abstract B026: RAF1 gene amplification drives RAS inhibitor resistance via nuclear translocation and interactions with PLK1 and Aurora A kinases","authors":"Hitendra S. Solanki, Denis Imbody, Bina Desai, Andriy Marusyk, Eric B. Haura","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-b026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-b026","url":null,"abstract":"Emerging data from clinical trials suggests that mechanisms that reactivate the MAPK pathway via gene amplification events can drive resistance to RAS inhibitors. This includes amplification of KRAS itself, as well as RAF1, RICTOR , and MYC. How amplification events affect signaling networks and the implications for therapeutic opportunities to overcome resistance remain unclear. To model this, we employed RMC-7977, a RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor structurally related to the clinical candidate daraxonrasib (RMC-6236), and established a RMC-7977–resistant (RMC-7977-R) H358 isogenic model that exhibit RAF1 amplification, as confirmed by amplicon-level analysis of whole-exome sequencing (WES), western blotting, and RNA sequencing. We evaluated this resistant cell line responses to a panel of RAS pathway–targeting agents, including RAF inhibitors (LXH-254 and exarafenib), MEK1/2 PROTAC degrader (MS934), pan-RAF-MEK non-degrading molecular glue (NST-628), RAF/MEK clamp (avutometinib) and MEK1/2 inhibitor (trametinib). Cell viability analysis demonstrated increased sensitivity of RMC-7977 resistant cells to RAF inhibitors compared to the parent H358. Combinations of MEK-targeting agents with either RAF inhibitors or RMC-7977 more effectively suppressed ERK phosphorylation in resistant cells compared to RAF inhibitors combinations with RMC-7977. However, combining RAF inhibitors with RMC-7977 or MEK-targeting agents (MS934, NST-628, avutometinib, or trametinib) more potently inhibited cell proliferation in resistant cells compared with combinations of RMC-7977 with MEK-targeting agents. In the context of siRNA-mediated RAF1 knockdown in RMC-7977 resistant cell line, trametinib treatment reduced ERK phosphorylation and inhibited cell proliferation more deeply than RMC-7977. This suggested that RAF1 may have additional signaling mechanisms beyond activation of MEK/ERK. To elucidate the mechanistic basis of LXH-254 activity in RAF1-amplified cells, we performed RNA sequencing and transcriptional analyses in cells treated with LXH-254, which revealed enrichment of G2/M checkpoint, MYC target, mitotic spindle, E2F target, and DNA repair signatures. Consistent with these observations, RAF inhibitors induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in RAF1-amplified cells, and the apoptotic response was enhanced when combined with RMC-7977 or MEK-targeting agents. Resistant cells exhibited increased nuclear RAF1 expression compared with parental H358. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal enhanced interactions between RAF1 and the mitotic kinases PLK1 and AURKA in resistant cells. Our data indicates that RAF1 amplification rewires signaling states by affecting nuclear G2/M signaling networks in addition to the MEK/ERK pathway. More broadly, our results suggest that RAF1 gene amplification associated with RAS inhibitor resistance may produce neomorphic signaling states that affect therapeutic sensitivity. Citation Format: Hitendra S. Solanki, Denis Imbody, ","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-ia005
Elizabeth M. Jaffee
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of only 13%. Mutant KRAS (mKRAS) is an oncogenic driver found in >90% of PDACs and the majority of associated precancer lesions, including >90% of PanINs and 80-90% of IPMNs. As a shared neoantigen thought to be the initiating genetic event driving precancer lesions and maintaining the PDAC malignancy phenotype, mKRAS is an attractive target for both precision immunotherapy of established PDAC, and for immune interception strategies in the precancer setting. We previously reported that vaccination against mKRAS can slow the progression of early PanIN lesions to invasive cancer and prolong survival in a KRASG12D-driven mouse model of PDAC. More recently, we reported the safety and induction of mKRAS-specific T cell responses with a first in patients mKRAS synthetic long peptide (SLP) vaccine given with ipilimumab and nivolumab to patients following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized PDAC. Patients demonstrating mKRAS immunity had associated prolonged recurrence-free survival. This SLP vaccine consisting of six 21-amino acid peptides, each carrying one of 6 mutations in the middle of the SLP, is now in testing for interception of PanINs and IPMNs. The results of these studies and future implications will be discussed. Citation Format: Elizabeth M. Jaffee. Mutant KRAS-Targeted Vaccines for Cancer Treatment and Interception [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr IA005.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,5年生存率仅为13%。突变型KRAS (mKRAS)是一种致癌驱动因子,发现于&;gt;90%的pdac和大多数相关的癌前病变,包括&;gt;90%的panin和80-90%的ipmn。作为一种共同的新抗原,被认为是驱动癌前病变和维持PDAC恶性表型的起始遗传事件,mKRAS是针对已建立的PDAC的精确免疫治疗和癌前环境中的免疫拦截策略的一个有吸引力的靶标。我们之前报道过,在krasg12d驱动的PDAC小鼠模型中,接种mKRAS疫苗可以减缓早期PanIN病变向侵袭性癌症的进展,并延长生存期。最近,我们报道了mKRAS特异性T细胞反应的安全性和诱导,首次在手术切除和局部PDAC辅助化疗后的患者中使用ipilimumab和nivolumab联合mKRAS合成长肽(SLP)疫苗。表现出mKRAS免疫的患者具有相关的延长无复发生存期。这种SLP疫苗由6个21个氨基酸的肽组成,每个肽在SLP中间携带6个突变中的一个,目前正在测试对PanINs和ipmn的拦截。这些研究的结果和未来的影响将被讨论。引用格式:Elizabeth M. Jaffee。靶向kras的肿瘤治疗和阻断突变疫苗[摘要]。摘自:AACR癌症研究特别会议论文集:RAS肿瘤发生和治疗;2026年3月5-8日;费城(PA): AACR;巨蟹座Res 2026;[j](增刊1):1 - 5。
{"title":"Abstract IA005: Mutant KRAS-Targeted Vaccines for Cancer Treatment and Interception","authors":"Elizabeth M. Jaffee","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-ia005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-ia005","url":null,"abstract":"Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of only 13%. Mutant KRAS (mKRAS) is an oncogenic driver found in >90% of PDACs and the majority of associated precancer lesions, including >90% of PanINs and 80-90% of IPMNs. As a shared neoantigen thought to be the initiating genetic event driving precancer lesions and maintaining the PDAC malignancy phenotype, mKRAS is an attractive target for both precision immunotherapy of established PDAC, and for immune interception strategies in the precancer setting. We previously reported that vaccination against mKRAS can slow the progression of early PanIN lesions to invasive cancer and prolong survival in a KRASG12D-driven mouse model of PDAC. More recently, we reported the safety and induction of mKRAS-specific T cell responses with a first in patients mKRAS synthetic long peptide (SLP) vaccine given with ipilimumab and nivolumab to patients following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized PDAC. Patients demonstrating mKRAS immunity had associated prolonged recurrence-free survival. This SLP vaccine consisting of six 21-amino acid peptides, each carrying one of 6 mutations in the middle of the SLP, is now in testing for interception of PanINs and IPMNs. The results of these studies and future implications will be discussed. Citation Format: Elizabeth M. Jaffee. Mutant KRAS-Targeted Vaccines for Cancer Treatment and Interception [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1): nr IA005.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147358921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and recurrence persist as major clinical challenges. Emerging evidence underscores that crosstalk between malignant cells and the immunosuppressive microenvironment facilitates tumor relapse, and elucidating the mechanistic details of this crosstalk could help guide development of improved therapies. Here, we identified di-methylation of lysine 513 (K513) on methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) as a key modification associated with CRC progression and recurrence. Mechanistically, SETD1A catalyzed METTL3 K513 methylation, enhancing its binding affinity to S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and augmenting RNA m⁶A deposition. METTL3 methylation suppressed endogenous retroelements expression, leading to impaired type I interferon responses and tumor immune evasion. Fluorouracil induced an E2F4/SETD1A/METTL3 regulatory axis, wherein E2F4 self-regulation activated SETD1A to drive METTL3 methylation. Targeting this axis through pharmacological inhibition of E2F4 or genetic disruption of METTL3 methylation cooperated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to significantly suppress tumor growth. These findings unveil a methylation-dependent regulatory mechanism that reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment, offering a therapeutic strategy for CRC.
{"title":"METTL3 Methylation Induces Decay of Endogenous Retroelement Transcripts to Promote Tumor Immune Evasion.","authors":"Xiaowei She,Jingqin Lan,Haokun Zhang,Gen Lu,Jialu Xu,Jiakun Zhang,Wenli Zhan,Shengjie Feng,Zejun Rao,Chengxin Yu,Baolin Han,Rui Zhang,Da Song,Yaqi Chen,Guihua Wang,Junbo Hu,Xuelai Luo,Haijie Li","doi":"10.1158/0008-5472.can-25-2893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-25-2893","url":null,"abstract":"Colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and recurrence persist as major clinical challenges. Emerging evidence underscores that crosstalk between malignant cells and the immunosuppressive microenvironment facilitates tumor relapse, and elucidating the mechanistic details of this crosstalk could help guide development of improved therapies. Here, we identified di-methylation of lysine 513 (K513) on methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) as a key modification associated with CRC progression and recurrence. Mechanistically, SETD1A catalyzed METTL3 K513 methylation, enhancing its binding affinity to S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and augmenting RNA m⁶A deposition. METTL3 methylation suppressed endogenous retroelements expression, leading to impaired type I interferon responses and tumor immune evasion. Fluorouracil induced an E2F4/SETD1A/METTL3 regulatory axis, wherein E2F4 self-regulation activated SETD1A to drive METTL3 methylation. Targeting this axis through pharmacological inhibition of E2F4 or genetic disruption of METTL3 methylation cooperated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to significantly suppress tumor growth. These findings unveil a methylation-dependent regulatory mechanism that reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment, offering a therapeutic strategy for CRC.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147350341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite the clinical utility of bevacizumab in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), resistance remains a major challenge. Here, we unveiled a lactate-mediated mechanism driving vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and bevacizumab resistance through PKM2 lactylation. PKM2 lactylation at K206 by AARS1 promoted PKM2 nuclear translocation and interaction with FOSL1. PKM2 binding facilitated FOSL1-dependent super-enhancer formation and target gene transcription, which contributed to CRC cell VM. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of PKM2 lactylation disrupted VM and synergized with bevacizumab in patient-derived pre-clinical models, significantly improving therapeutic efficacy. Together, this study reveals lactylation as a metabolic switch linking cancer glycolytic reprogramming to transcriptional rewiring and proposes targeting PKM2 lactylation to enhance the anti-tumor activity of bevacizumab in CRC.
{"title":"PKM2 Lactylation Promotes Colorectal Cancer Vasculogenic Mimicry and Bevacizumab Resistance by Facilitating FOSL1 Super-Enhancer Formation.","authors":"Weihao Li,Jianhong Peng,Jiahua He,Leen Liao,Da Kang,Weili Zhang,Weifeng Wang,Ruowei Wang,Song Wang,Yuanbin Liao,Long Yu,Qingjian Ou,Yujing Fang,Xiaojun Wu,Peirong Ding,Zhizhong Pan,Chi Zhou,Junzhong Lin","doi":"10.1158/0008-5472.can-25-3520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-25-3520","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the clinical utility of bevacizumab in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), resistance remains a major challenge. Here, we unveiled a lactate-mediated mechanism driving vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and bevacizumab resistance through PKM2 lactylation. PKM2 lactylation at K206 by AARS1 promoted PKM2 nuclear translocation and interaction with FOSL1. PKM2 binding facilitated FOSL1-dependent super-enhancer formation and target gene transcription, which contributed to CRC cell VM. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of PKM2 lactylation disrupted VM and synergized with bevacizumab in patient-derived pre-clinical models, significantly improving therapeutic efficacy. Together, this study reveals lactylation as a metabolic switch linking cancer glycolytic reprogramming to transcriptional rewiring and proposes targeting PKM2 lactylation to enhance the anti-tumor activity of bevacizumab in CRC.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147350780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}