Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.005
Claire Petit , Agnès Tallet
The advances in cancer screening and therapies have allowed the improvement of metastatic patients’ survival, including those with brain metastases. This led to a substantial shift in brain metastases patients’ management for whom whole-brain radiation therapy, formerly widely used, has given way to a more focused management in which single- or multifractionated stereotactic radiation therapy now plays a predominant role. Although stereotactic radiation therapy offers excellent local control rates (70 to 90%), it does not prevent brain recurrence outside the radiation field, which is all the more frequent the higher the number of initial metastases and the longer the patient's survival. In the case of brain recurrence after irradiation, therapeutic options will depend both on the previous treatment and on the features of the recurrence. This article aims to review the available data on the efficacy and tolerability of various reirradiation schemes in different clinical situations.
{"title":"Brain metastases reirradiation","authors":"Claire Petit , Agnès Tallet","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The advances in cancer screening and therapies have allowed the improvement of metastatic patients’ survival, including those with brain metastases. This led to a substantial shift in brain metastases patients’ management for whom whole-brain radiation therapy, formerly widely used, has given way to a more focused management in which single- or multifractionated stereotactic radiation therapy now plays a predominant role. Although stereotactic radiation therapy offers excellent local control rates (70 to 90%), it does not prevent brain recurrence outside the radiation field, which is all the more frequent the higher the number of initial metastases and the longer the patient's survival. In the case of brain recurrence after irradiation, therapeutic options will depend both on the previous treatment and on the features of the recurrence. This article aims to review the available data on the efficacy and tolerability of various reirradiation schemes in different clinical situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 538-546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.004
Louis Grasso , Vincent Bourbonne , Francois Lucia
Due to the recent advances in the systemic treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, the management of locoregional recurrences, especially after initial radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy), is of increasing significance. The potential alternatives in this setting include: a salvage local strategy (based on surgery, radiotherapy or thermoablative treatment), promising approach, but sometimes difficult to implement in often frail patients, and whose modalities remain under-researched; or alternatively, the initiation of systemic treatment, where the prognosis aligns with that of de novo metastatic patients. This comprehensive literature review focused on salvage radiotherapy treatment of recurrent non-small cell lung carcinomas, after initial radiotherapy, with or without associated systemic treatment. It aims to present the main findings on this area, from patient selection and preparation, to key characteristics, including dosimetric aspects, and the main limitations and uncertainties associated with this therapeutic modality.
{"title":"Thoracic reirradiation of recurrent non-small cell lung carcinoma: A comprehensive review","authors":"Louis Grasso , Vincent Bourbonne , Francois Lucia","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the recent advances in the systemic treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, the management of locoregional recurrences, especially after initial radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy), is of increasing significance. The potential alternatives in this setting include: a salvage local strategy (based on surgery, radiotherapy or thermoablative treatment), promising approach, but sometimes difficult to implement in often frail patients, and whose modalities remain under-researched; or alternatively, the initiation of systemic treatment, where the prognosis aligns with that of de novo metastatic patients. This comprehensive literature review focused on salvage radiotherapy treatment of recurrent non-small cell lung carcinomas, after initial radiotherapy, with or without associated systemic treatment. It aims to present the main findings on this area, from patient selection and preparation, to key characteristics, including dosimetric aspects, and the main limitations and uncertainties associated with this therapeutic modality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 591-596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.005
Sophie Boisbouvier , Simon Corbin , Axel Béasse , Aurélien De Oliveira , Céline Bourgier , behalf of the Comité des manipulateurs d’électroradiologie médicale en radiothérapie de l’AFPPE
In 2022, the radiation therapist committee of the Association française du personnel paramédical d’electroradiologie médicale (AFPPE, French association of paramedical electroradiology technicians), the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO, French society of radiation oncology) and the Syndicat national des radiothérapeutes oncologue (SNRO, national syndicate of radiation oncologists) have been committed to working on the development of advanced practice roles. The objective of this article is to report the activities that should be in the scope of radiation therapists advanced practice and describe the competences required for these activities. This work was carried out by six radiation therapists, six radiation oncologists and one medical physicist representatives of the French national societies for each professional group. First, a basic list of activities was established and then competences were identified for groups of activities. In total, the list includes five core competences, nine competences and nine groups of activities that can be divided into the four pillars of advanced practice. The nine groups of activities can be presented in seven different dimensions including patient care and support, treatment planning, treatment imaging and delivery, management and consultancy, quality and risk management, research and innovation, education and training. The French advanced practice competences framework was developed with a multidisciplinary group to move forward the project of a master degree in advanced practice in radiation therapy in France.
{"title":"Committee of the new positions of the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique: Toward an advanced practice master in radiotherapy","authors":"Sophie Boisbouvier , Simon Corbin , Axel Béasse , Aurélien De Oliveira , Céline Bourgier , behalf of the Comité des manipulateurs d’électroradiologie médicale en radiothérapie de l’AFPPE","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2022, the radiation therapist committee of the Association française du personnel paramédical d’electroradiologie médicale (AFPPE, French association of paramedical electroradiology technicians), the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO, French society of radiation oncology) and the Syndicat national des radiothérapeutes oncologue (SNRO, national syndicate of radiation oncologists) have been committed to working on the development of advanced practice roles. The objective of this article is to report the activities that should be in the scope of radiation therapists advanced practice and describe the competences required for these activities. This work was carried out by six radiation therapists, six radiation oncologists and one medical physicist representatives of the French national societies for each professional group. First, a basic list of activities was established and then competences were identified for groups of activities. In total, the list includes five core competences, nine competences and nine groups of activities that can be divided into the four pillars of advanced practice. The nine groups of activities can be presented in seven different dimensions including patient care and support, treatment planning, treatment imaging and delivery, management and consultancy, quality and risk management, research and innovation, education and training. The French advanced practice competences framework was developed with a multidisciplinary group to move forward the project of a master degree in advanced practice in radiation therapy in France.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 560-564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142334351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.005
Olivier Riou , Christophe Hennequin , Jonathan Khalifa , Paul Sargos
Trimodal therapy consisting of transurethral resection of bladder tumors followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has emerged as a valuable therapeutic alternative to radical cystectomy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Concomitant radiosensitising chemotherapy is a component of trimodality increasing locoregional control compared to radiotherapy alone. The combinations 5-fluorouracil with mitomycin or cisplatin are the best supported in the literature. Gemcitabine appears to be a feasible and promising alternative. There is considerable international heterogeneity in terms of dose, volumes and fractionation. The most commonly used regimens are moderately hypofractionated (55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) and normofractionated (64 Gy in 32 fractions) regimens. Radiotherapy for bladder cancer is an effective and evolving treatment, with current technical developments, and studies of new combinations with systemic treatments underway.
{"title":"News and prospects on radiotherapy for bladder cancer: Is trimodal therapy becoming the gold standard?","authors":"Olivier Riou , Christophe Hennequin , Jonathan Khalifa , Paul Sargos","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trimodal therapy consisting of transurethral resection of bladder tumors followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has emerged as a valuable therapeutic alternative to radical cystectomy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Concomitant radiosensitising chemotherapy is a component of trimodality increasing locoregional control compared to radiotherapy alone. The combinations 5-fluorouracil with mitomycin or cisplatin are the best supported in the literature. Gemcitabine appears to be a feasible and promising alternative. There is considerable international heterogeneity in terms of dose, volumes and fractionation. The most commonly used regimens are moderately hypofractionated (55<!--> <!-->Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) and normofractionated (64<!--> <!-->Gy in 32 fractions) regimens. Radiotherapy for bladder cancer is an effective and evolving treatment, with current technical developments, and studies of new combinations with systemic treatments underway.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 623-627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.006
Ulrike Schick , Vincent Bourbonne , François Lucia , Camille Verry
Radiotherapy is a major therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. Despite many technology advances in the last two decades, local control remains often suboptimal, especially in locally advanced tumours, which are often hypoxic, and radioresistant. In addition, irradiation of surrounding tissues and organs at risk usually precludes further dose escalation to minimize acute and late toxicities. Radiosensitizing agents such as chemotherapies targeting the DNA repair, or targeted monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab) have been shown to improve local control in many tumour types. More recently, radioenhancers have emerged as a new way to overcome the limitations of radiation. Here, we review the state of the art in this field and will focus on the past and ongoing clinical trials with the nanoparticles NBTXR3 and AGuIX®.
放疗是治疗癌症的主要策略。尽管在过去二十年中取得了许多技术进步，但局部控制效果往往仍不理想，尤其是局部晚期肿瘤，因为这些肿瘤通常缺氧并具有放射抗性。此外，对周围组织和器官的辐照通常会带来风险，因此无法进一步提高剂量，以尽量减少急性和晚期毒性。针对 DNA 修复的化疗药或靶向单克隆抗体（西妥昔单抗）等放射增敏剂已被证明可改善许多肿瘤类型的局部控制。最近，放射增强剂作为一种新方法出现，克服了辐射的局限性。在此，我们将回顾这一领域的最新进展，并重点介绍纳米粒子 NBTXR3 和 AGuIX® 过去和正在进行的临床试验。
{"title":"Use of nanoparticles in radiation oncology","authors":"Ulrike Schick , Vincent Bourbonne , François Lucia , Camille Verry","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Radiotherapy is a major therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. Despite many technology advances in the last two decades, local control remains often suboptimal, especially in locally advanced tumours, which are often hypoxic, and radioresistant. In addition, irradiation of surrounding tissues and organs at risk usually precludes further dose escalation to minimize acute and late toxicities. Radiosensitizing agents such as chemotherapies targeting the DNA repair, or targeted monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab) have been shown to improve local control in many tumour types. More recently, radioenhancers have emerged as a new way to overcome the limitations of radiation. Here, we review the state of the art in this field and will focus on the past and ongoing clinical trials with the nanoparticles NBTXR3 and AGuIX®.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 618-622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.06.002
David Azria , Morgan Michalet , Olivier Riou , Céline Bourgier , Muriel Brengues , Yohann Sroussi , Sophie Gourgou , Marie-Pierre Farcy-Jacquet , Léa Kotzki , Mahmut Ozsahin
The impact of curative radiotherapy mainly depends on the total dose delivered to the tumor. However, despite recent technological advances, the dose delivered to surrounding healthy tissues may reduce the therapeutic ratio of many radiation treatments. In the same population treated at one center with the same technique, individual radiosensitivity clearly exists, particularly in terms of late side effects that are, in principle, non-reversible. This article details the history of the radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis assay, from preclinical data to multicenter clinical trials. It puts the performance of such assays into perspective to define the optimal clinical situations for its use in daily practice.
{"title":"Radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis assay: Primetime for routine clinical use?","authors":"David Azria , Morgan Michalet , Olivier Riou , Céline Bourgier , Muriel Brengues , Yohann Sroussi , Sophie Gourgou , Marie-Pierre Farcy-Jacquet , Léa Kotzki , Mahmut Ozsahin","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.06.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of curative radiotherapy mainly depends on the total dose delivered to the tumor. However, despite recent technological advances, the dose delivered to surrounding healthy tissues may reduce the therapeutic ratio of many radiation treatments. In the same population treated at one center with the same technique, individual radiosensitivity clearly exists, particularly in terms of late side effects that are, in principle, non-reversible. This article details the history of the radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis assay, from preclinical data to multicenter clinical trials. It puts the performance of such assays into perspective to define the optimal clinical situations for its use in daily practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 442-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142303386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.001
Abdulhamid Chaikh , Magali Édouard , Christelle Huet , Fabien Milliat , Carmen Villagrasa , Aurélie Isambert
Ultra-high dose rate external beam radiotherapy (UHDR-RT) uses dose rates of several tens to thousands of Gy/s, compared with the dose rate of the order of a few Gy/min for conventional radiotherapy techniques, currently used in clinical practice. The use of such dose rate is likely to improve the therapeutic index by obtaining a radiobiological effect, known as the “FLASH” effect. This would maintain tumor control while enhancing tissues protection. To date, this effect has been achieved using beams of electrons, photons, protons, and heavy ions. However, the conditions required to achieve this “FLASH” effect are not well defined, and raise several questions, particularly with regard to the definition of the prescription, including dose fractionation, irradiated volume and the temporal structure of the pulsed beam. In addition, the dose delivered over a very short period induces technical challenges, particularly in terms of detectors, which must be mastered to guarantee safe clinical implementation. IRSN has carried out an in-depth literature review of the UHDR-RT technique, covering various aspects relating to patient radiation protection: the radiobiological mechanisms associated with the FLASH effect, the used temporal structure of the UHDR beams, accelerators and dose control, the properties of detectors to be used with UHDR beams, planning, clinical implementation, and clinical studies already carried out or in progress.
{"title":"Towards clinical application of ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy and the FLASH effect: Challenges and current status","authors":"Abdulhamid Chaikh , Magali Édouard , Christelle Huet , Fabien Milliat , Carmen Villagrasa , Aurélie Isambert","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ultra-high dose rate external beam radiotherapy (UHDR-RT) uses dose rates of several tens to thousands of Gy/s, compared with the dose rate of the order of a few Gy/min for conventional radiotherapy techniques, currently used in clinical practice. The use of such dose rate is likely to improve the therapeutic index by obtaining a radiobiological effect, known as the “FLASH” effect. This would maintain tumor control while enhancing tissues protection. To date, this effect has been achieved using beams of electrons, photons, protons, and heavy ions. However, the conditions required to achieve this “FLASH” effect are not well defined, and raise several questions, particularly with regard to the definition of the prescription, including dose fractionation, irradiated volume and the temporal structure of the pulsed beam. In addition, the dose delivered over a very short period induces technical challenges, particularly in terms of detectors, which must be mastered to guarantee safe clinical implementation. IRSN has carried out an in-depth literature review of the UHDR-RT technique, covering various aspects relating to patient radiation protection: the radiobiological mechanisms associated with the FLASH effect, the used temporal structure of the UHDR beams, accelerators and dose control, the properties of detectors to be used with UHDR beams, planning, clinical implementation, and clinical studies already carried out or in progress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 463-473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142303387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.06.001
Pierre Bischoff , Jolie Bou-Gharios , Georges Noël , Hélène Burckel
Autophagy is an innate cellular process characterized by self-digestion, wherein cells degrade or recycle aged proteins, misfolded proteins, and damaged organelles via lysosomal pathways. Its crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis, ensuring development and survival is well established. In the context of cancer therapy, autophagy's importance is firmly recognized, given its critical impact on treatment efficacy. Following radiotherapy, several factors can modulate autophagy including parameters related to radiation type and delivery methods. The concomitant use of chemotherapy with radiotherapy further influences autophagy, potentially either enhancing radiosensitivity or promoting radioresistance. This review article discusses some pharmacological agents and drugs capable of modulating autophagy levels in conjunction with radiation in tumor cells, with a focus on those identified as potential radiosensitizers in glioblastoma multiforme treatment.
{"title":"Role of autophagy in modulating tumor cell radiosensitivity: Exploring pharmacological interventions for glioblastoma multiforme treatment","authors":"Pierre Bischoff , Jolie Bou-Gharios , Georges Noël , Hélène Burckel","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autophagy is an innate cellular process characterized by self-digestion, wherein cells degrade or recycle aged proteins, misfolded proteins, and damaged organelles via lysosomal pathways. Its crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis, ensuring development and survival is well established. In the context of cancer therapy, autophagy's importance is firmly recognized, given its critical impact on treatment efficacy. Following radiotherapy, several factors can modulate autophagy including parameters related to radiation type and delivery methods. The concomitant use of chemotherapy with radiotherapy further influences autophagy, potentially either enhancing radiosensitivity or promoting radioresistance. This review article discusses some pharmacological agents and drugs capable of modulating autophagy levels in conjunction with radiation in tumor cells, with a focus on those identified as potential radiosensitizers in glioblastoma multiforme treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 416-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142334354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), early complications of the radiotherapy (RT) are observed from the beginning of the treatment to a few months after its end. During external radiotherapy treatment, several patient-dependent parameters can cause a modification of the dose distribution compared to the planned distribution due to variation in patient positioning, anatomy, or intra-fractional movements for example. To verify these parameters during treatment sessions, one of the most commonly used solutions is the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Nowadays, the use of CBCT may constitutes a significant part of the total dose at the end of treatment (up to 10 cGy per session) and more often the volume irradiated by imaging is larger than the one irradiated by the treatment, leading to unintentional irradiation of nearby organs.
In this study, we asked whether the imaging low dose added to a following fraction dose (2 Gy) may affect the biological response in terms of DNA repair.
Material and methods
Using an IVInomad dosimeter and scintillating fiber probes specially designed for this exploratory study, we exposed fibroblasts cells from head and neck cancer (HNC) patients to a CBCT dose followed by a radiotherapy fraction dose. DNA double strand breaks and DNA repair were assessed by immunofluorescence using the biomarkers gamma H2AX (γH2AX) and pATM.
Results
The median dose of CBCT was measured between 17 to 21 mGy per session. The kinetics of both biomarkers were found to be strongly dependent on the individual factor in radiosensitive patients. For HNC patients, a prior CBCT dose applied few minutes before the 2 Gy dose may have a sublinear effect on the DNA repair mechanisms and potentially on observed health tissue toxicity.
Conclusion
The preliminary results obtained highlight the importance of individual and tissue factors for recognizing and repairing DSB during a treatment by radiotherapy using CBCT.
{"title":"Impact of kV-cone beam computed tomography dose on DNA repair mechanisms: A pilot study","authors":"Christian Popotte , Élise Berthel , Romain Letellier , Tiziana Rancati , Ester Orlandi , Mélodie Munier , Paul Retif , Sandrine Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), early complications of the radiotherapy (RT) are observed from the beginning of the treatment to a few months after its end. During external radiotherapy treatment, several patient-dependent parameters can cause a modification of the dose distribution compared to the planned distribution due to variation in patient positioning, anatomy, or intra-fractional movements for example. To verify these parameters during treatment sessions, one of the most commonly used solutions is the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Nowadays, the use of CBCT may constitutes a significant part of the total dose at the end of treatment (up to 10 cGy per session) and more often the volume irradiated by imaging is larger than the one irradiated by the treatment, leading to unintentional irradiation of nearby organs.</div><div>In this study, we asked whether the imaging low dose added to a following fraction dose (2<!--> <!-->Gy) may affect the biological response in terms of DNA repair.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Using an IVInomad dosimeter and scintillating fiber probes specially designed for this exploratory study, we exposed fibroblasts cells from head and neck cancer (HNC) patients to a CBCT dose followed by a radiotherapy fraction dose. DNA double strand breaks and DNA repair were assessed by immunofluorescence using the biomarkers gamma H2AX (γH2AX) and pATM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median dose of CBCT was measured between 17 to 21 mGy per session. The kinetics of both biomarkers were found to be strongly dependent on the individual factor in radiosensitive patients. For HNC patients, a prior CBCT dose applied few minutes before the 2<!--> <!-->Gy dose may have a sublinear effect on the DNA repair mechanisms and potentially on observed health tissue toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The preliminary results obtained highlight the importance of individual and tissue factors for recognizing and repairing DSB during a treatment by radiotherapy using CBCT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 449-452"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142303374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.002
Benoît Paquette, Ayman Oweida
Radiotherapy is widely used to treat various cancers. Its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors is intensively studied preclinically and clinically. Although the first results were very encouraging, the number of patients who respond positively remains low, and the therapeutic benefit is often temporary. This review summarizes how radiation can stimulate an antitumor immune response and its combination with immunotherapy based on inhibiting immune checkpoints. We will provide an overview of radiotherapy parameters that should be better controlled to avoid downregulating the antitumor immune response. The low response rate of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy could, at least in part, be caused by the stimulation of cancer cell invasion and metastasis development that occur at similar doses and number of radiation fractions. To end on a positive note, we explore how a targeted inhibition of the inflammatory cytokines induced by radiation with a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor could both support an antitumor immune response and block radiation-induced metastasis formation.
{"title":"Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in duality with the protumoral action of radiation","authors":"Benoît Paquette, Ayman Oweida","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Radiotherapy is widely used to treat various cancers. Its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors is intensively studied preclinically and clinically. Although the first results were very encouraging, the number of patients who respond positively remains low, and the therapeutic benefit is often temporary. This review summarizes how radiation can stimulate an antitumor immune response and its combination with immunotherapy based on inhibiting immune checkpoints. We will provide an overview of radiotherapy parameters that should be better controlled to avoid downregulating the antitumor immune response. The low response rate of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy could, at least in part, be caused by the stimulation of cancer cell invasion and metastasis development that occur at similar doses and number of radiation fractions. To end on a positive note, we explore how a targeted inhibition of the inflammatory cytokines induced by radiation with a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor could both support an antitumor immune response and block radiation-induced metastasis formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 484-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142303372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号