Cancers最新文献

Introduction: Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a specialised radiotherapy technique that plays an essential role in achieving local control of brain metastases and therefore optimising quality of life for many cancer patients. It also confers a survival benefit in selected patients. Rural and regional Australians may face significant challenges in accessing this treatment, as it is predominantly delivered at metropolitan institutions. We sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of a brain SRS service implemented using local resources at a North Queensland regional hospital from a societal perspective. Methods: We prospectively collected treatment costs and clinical outcomes for a consecutive cohort of patients who received SRS for intracranial metastatic lesions at a regional cancer centre since the implementation of the brain SRS program in September 2022. We compared the healthcare and non-healthcare costs (e.g., travel and informal care) with the costs that would have otherwise been incurred if patients were referred to metropolitan centres in the state capital. Clinical outcomes incorporated overall survival, intracranial disease control rates, and incidence of radiation necrosis. Clinical outcome data of the metropolitan centres were derived from the published literature. Results: A total of 34 patients received treatment during the study period. Their median age was 65 years (range: 49-78 years). Around 47% received adjuvant SRS following surgical resection, and the remaining 53% were treated for intact brain metastases. The predominant primary malignancy was non-small cell lung cancer. The mean total cost per course of brain SRS at a regional hospital was AUD 6690, including AUD 5754 for healthcare and AUD 1682 for non-healthcare costs, across 34 patients recruited between September 2022 and August 2024. This was AUD 760 less than that of a course of treatment delivered at a metropolitan hospital. Median survival among the cohort was 15.7 months, and eight patients (24%) developed radionecrosis; these were comparable to published data reported by Australian urban and international institutions. Conclusions: The implementation of a brain SRS service at regional cancer centres utilising existing infrastructure and local expertise has the potential to offer cost-effective treatment to rural and regional cancer patients. This approach improves access for patients who might otherwise face logistics barriers and competing life priorities when seeking treatment in metropolitan centres.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global health burden, with poor outcomes largely due to diagnosis at an advanced stage and the limited performance of current surveillance tools. Ultrasound with alpha fetoprotein (AFP) provides insufficient sensitivity for early-stage detection, highlighting the need to better identify the at-risk population. Focus of the review: Many HCC risk scores have been proposed; however, some depend on specialized laboratory data that are not widely available. This review summarizes risk scores that show reliable discrimination and rely on demographic, clinical, or molecular information that can be readily obtained in routine care. Conclusions: Advances in HCC risk scores support the move toward surveillance approaches based on individual risk. These tools can improve risk stratification, increase the likelihood of early detection, and potentially support better outcomes for people who belong to the at-risk population for HCC.

Background/objectives: Cytoreduction status is a critical prognostic factor in ovarian cancer, yet preoperative selection of patients suitable for primary debulking surgery and accurate prediction of surgical outcome remain challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of MRI-based Fagotti score and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) for predicting resectability of peritoneal disease in ovarian cancer patients.

Methods: This was a prospective single-center observational study. Patients with suspected primary ovarian cancer who underwent preoperative MRI of the abdomen and pelvis with a dedicated protocol were considered. MRI-based Fagotti score and PCI were determined by two readers independently, using a combination of T2W, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1W sequences. In cases of discordance, a third radiologist reviewed the scans and consensus was reached. ROC analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate prognostic performance. The reference standard to predict resectability was optimal cytoreduction defined as residual disease ≤1 cm.

Results: Forty-six women with epithelial ovarian cancer (mean age 56.3 ± 2.6 years) who underwent preoperative MRI, followed by laparoscopy and/or laparotomy, were included in the study. Both MRI-based Fagotti score and PCI showed high predictive value for predicting resectability (AUC 0.92 and 0.94, respectively). Optimal cut-offs were ≤6 for Fagotti score and ≤20 for PCI. Patients with scores below these thresholds had >60-fold (Fagotti) and >100-fold (PCI) increased odds for successful primary cytoreduction (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: MRI-based Fagotti score and PCI may serve as powerful noninvasive predictors of surgical outcome in ovarian cancer. MRI may reliably guide treatment decisions, reducing unnecessary laparotomies and optimizing patient selection.

Background: Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) have poor prognosis after surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may improve outcomes, but their long-term efficacy remains unclear. Methods: This multicenter study analyzed LA-ESCC patients from three Chinese hospitals (2015-2024) who received nCIT or nCRT followed by surgery. Primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and adverse events. Propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics. Results: Among 225 patients (87 nCRT, 138 nCIT), matched cohorts (87 per group) showed that nCRT had higher ORR (85.06% vs. 45.98%), T/N downstaging rates (78.16% vs. 58.62%; 85.06% vs. 45.98%), and pCR (37.90% vs. 14.90%) (all p < 0.01). After median follow-up (nCIT: 44.5 months; nCRT: 35.1 months), nCIT improved 3-year OS (75.90% vs. 55.60%) and DFS (66.40% vs. 47.30%) (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis favored nCRT in N+ or non-cT4 disease. Clinical N stage independently predicted survival. Conclusion: nCIT demonstrates superior survival benefits in LA-ESCC, while nCRT may be more effective for N+ or non-cT4 patients. Further randomized trials are warranted.

Background: Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is an innovative non-invasive imaging technique recently introduced in dermatology. Its use has been established particularly in the diagnosis of skin cancer. The LC-OCT description of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) criteria has served for the conduction of retrospective evaluations on its diagnostic performance, which demonstrated its utility in diagnosis and subtyping BCC. However, prospective studies performed at patients' bedside are currently lacking in this field. Objective: The objective of the study was to provide parameters of LC-OCT diagnostic performance for BCC derived from a prospective study performed at patients' bedside. Methods: Lesions clinically equivocal for BCC were prospectively included. Dermoscopic and LC-OCT diagnoses were obtained at the patients' bedside by an expert observer prior to surgical excision or biopsy. Results: A total of 214 lesions (163 BCCs and 51 BCC imitators) belonging to 119 patients were included. For the differentiation of BCC from BCC-imitators, LC-OCT had the same sensitivity as dermoscopy (98%) but a better specificity (90% vs. 37%). For the discrimination of superficial BCC from other BCC subtypes, LC-OCT had an increased sensitivity and specificity compared to dermoscopy (72% vs. 62%, and 97% vs. 84%, respectively). Conclusions: This prospective study showed that the diagnostic performance for BCC diagnosis and subtyping can be remarkedly increased by LC-OCT compared to dermoscopic examination alone. Our data encourages the inclusion of LC-OCT in the diagnostic process and management of equivocal lesions for BCC.

Background: As pediatric head and neck cancer (pHNC) incidence increases, the development of new surgical oncology techniques to reduce morbidity are essential. Intraoperative navigation (iNav) represents the most translatable technology among both the model-comparative and integrative surgical navigation technologies to optimize surgical outcomes.

Methods: A scoping review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines from 1970 to present (February 2025), investigating the use of iNav in cases of pHNC. Patient case details and authors' perception of iNav's utility were analyzed. A single-center retrospective case series review (September 2022 to September 2025) of the senior authors' experience employing iNav in pHNC cases was also performed.

Results: The scoping review identified twenty-seven cases of pHNC from sixteen studies that both utilized iNav and met the inclusion criteria. Many of the authors commented favorably on the utility of iNav technology, while concurrently agreeing upon its limitations. The case series review identified five cases of pHNC that met the inclusion criteria. This small case series revealed a 100% R0 resection rate with the use of iNav in four pHNC resections. The fifth case used iNav for biopsy site selection.

Conclusions: The results of our scoping review as well as our institutional experience with this technology demonstrate its utility in guiding surgical approach, confirming depth of resection, and navigating marginal assessment. This study was limited by incidental and incomplete reporting of iNav's clinical application to pHNC; several extensive institutional reports had to be excluded due to insufficiently detailed data linkage. Our review builds upon the existing pediatric surgical literature, anchoring the evidentiary justification for the application of iNav to pediatric head and neck surgery.

Liquid biopsy is now a valuable complementary tool that oncologists use to obtain a more complete picture of their patients' condition in real time [...].

ARID1A, a key subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, plays a context-dependent function in cancer, acting both as a tumor suppressor and, in certain conditions, as an oncogene. ARID1A, as a tumor suppressor, maintains transcriptional regulation, genomic stability, and cellular differentiation. In breast cancer, ARID1A loss-of-function leads to dysregulation of cell cycle checkpoints and impaired DNA repair and promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), jointly accelerating tumor proliferation and increasing therapeutic resistance. Notably, context-dependent ARID1A loss-of-function often concurs with activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and corresponds with poor prognosis. On the contrary, aberrant ARID1A overexpression can provoke oxidative stress and agitate the cytochrome P450 system, potentially facilitating early tumorigenesis. Consequently, understanding ARID1A's dual and context-dependent role highlights its potential as a biomarker and therapeutic target in precision oncology.

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with both the disease and the treatments affecting patients' quality of life and overall survival. Patient preference studies can help to identify what matters most to patients. This study aims to provide an overview of published patient preference studies in breast cancer, focusing on (i) the design of the study, (ii) preference outcomes including preference heterogeneity, (iii) recruitment strategies, and (iv) patient involvement. Methods: For this scoping review, a search strategy was created for five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAHL), based on the concepts 'breast cancer' and 'patient preference'. The articles were screened double-blind in two phases, after which, the relevant data was extracted and analyzed. Results: A total of 31 articles were selected based on the eligibility criteria. The studies were published over a wide time range (1995-2024), and across different countries. Different methodologies were used, and different attributes were included, mainly related to adverse events of treatments and survival elements. Survival elements were almost always considered important when included. Preference heterogeneity was assessed in 24 of the included studies. The involvement of patients in these studies varied; in two studies, patients were involved in an advisory board; in five studies, patients provided feedback on the preference study conduct via interviews or focus group discussions; and in twelve studies, pilot tests were mentioned. Conclusions: The studies show diverse methods, outcomes, and patient involvement strategies. This may complicate the implementation of preferences in decision-making, suggesting preference studies with clear objectives and implementation strategies to create impact for and with patients.

Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and second by mortality among all cancers in Croatia. The Organized National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program was introduced by the government in 2007. It targets individuals aged 50-74 years with a biennial screening with a guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT). The aim of this study is to analyze the costs associated with colorectal cancer in Croatia and to compare the cost-effectiveness of three screening strategies: no screening, biennial gFOBT, and biennial fecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Patients and methods: A model was developed to compare the three screening scenarios. The model simulated a cohort of 10,000 patients aged 50 years without colorectal cancer. Health outcomes and associated costs were projected over a five-year time horizon. The model outcomes include the number of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases, number of colorectal cancer-related deaths, life-years gained, and costs per life-year gained. Results: The average five-year costs per patient for the treatment of advanced cancer are EUR 39,802, which is substantially higher than the average costs of EUR 16,897 per patient across all stages. The implemented model indicates that both screening options yielded improved health outcomes at lower costs compared with no screening. FIT is considered the preferred screening option due to its higher sensitivity, greater health outcomes, and lower costs relative to gFOBT. Conclusions: The introduction of FIT screening instead of gFOBT could increase screening uptake for colorectal cancer, improve health outcomes, and reduce healthcare expenditures and the economic burden associated with colorectal cancer in Croatia.