Wildfires in the western US increasingly threaten infrastructure, air quality, and public health. Prescribed (“Rx”) fire is often proposed to mitigate future wildfires, but treatments remain limited, and few studies quantify their effectiveness on recent major wildfires. We investigate the effects of Rx fire treatments on subsequent burn severity across western US ecoregions and particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions in California. Using high-resolution (30-m) satellite imagery, land management records, and fire emissions data, we employ a quasi-experimental design to compare Rx fire-treated areas with adjacent untreated areas to estimate the impacts of recent Rx fires (Fall 2018–Spring 2020) on the extreme 2020 wildfire season. We find that within 2020 wildfire burn areas where Rx fires were used prior to 2020, burn severity changed by −16% (p < 0.001) and smoke PM2.5 emissions changed by −101 kg per acre (p < 0.1). Rx fires in the wildland-urban interface (“WUI”) were less effective in reducing burn severity and smoke PM2.5 emissions than those outside the WUI. Overall, Rx fires led to a net reduction of −14% in PM2.5 emissions, including those from the Rx fires themselves. The proposed policy of treating one million acres annually in California could reduce smoke emissions by 655,000 tons over the next 5 years, equivalent to 52% of the emissions from 2020 wildfires. Our analysis provides comprehensive estimates of the net benefits of Rx fire on subsequent burn severity and smoke PM2.5 emissions in the western US, an empirical basis for evaluating proposed Rx fire expansions, and valuable constraints for future modeling.
{"title":"Effect of Recent Prescribed Burning and Land Management on Wildfire Burn Severity and Smoke Emissions in the Western United States","authors":"Makoto Kelp, Marshall Burke, Minghao Qiu, Iván Higuera-Mendieta, Tianjia Liu, Noah S. Diffenbaugh","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001682","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001682","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildfires in the western US increasingly threaten infrastructure, air quality, and public health. Prescribed (“Rx”) fire is often proposed to mitigate future wildfires, but treatments remain limited, and few studies quantify their effectiveness on recent major wildfires. We investigate the effects of Rx fire treatments on subsequent burn severity across western US ecoregions and particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) emissions in California. Using high-resolution (30-m) satellite imagery, land management records, and fire emissions data, we employ a quasi-experimental design to compare Rx fire-treated areas with adjacent untreated areas to estimate the impacts of recent Rx fires (Fall 2018–Spring 2020) on the extreme 2020 wildfire season. We find that within 2020 wildfire burn areas where Rx fires were used prior to 2020, burn severity changed by −16% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and smoke PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions changed by −101 kg per acre (<i>p</i> < 0.1). Rx fires in the wildland-urban interface (“WUI”) were less effective in reducing burn severity and smoke PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions than those outside the WUI. Overall, Rx fires led to a net reduction of −14% in PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions, including those from the Rx fires themselves. The proposed policy of treating one million acres annually in California could reduce smoke emissions by 655,000 tons over the next 5 years, equivalent to 52% of the emissions from 2020 wildfires. Our analysis provides comprehensive estimates of the net benefits of Rx fire on subsequent burn severity and smoke PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in the western US, an empirical basis for evaluating proposed Rx fire expansions, and valuable constraints for future modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001682","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144482251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sjoerd Terpstra, Swinda K. J. Falkena, Robbin Bastiaansen, Sebastian Bathiany, Henk A. Dijkstra, Anna S. von der Heydt
Past research has shown that multiple climate subsystems might undergo abrupt shifts, such as the Arctic Winter sea ice or the Amazon rainforest, but there are large uncertainties regarding their timing and spatial extent. In this study we investigated when and where abrupt shifts occur in the latest generation of earth system models (CMIP6) under a scenario of 1% annual increase in CO2. We considered 82 ocean, atmosphere, and land variables across 57 models. We used a Canny edge detection method to identify abrupt shifts occurring on yearly to decadal timescales, and performed a connected component analysis to quantify the spatial extent of these shifts. The systems analyzed include the North Atlantic subpolar gyre, Tibetan Plateau, land permafrost, Amazon rainforest, Antarctic sea ice, monsoon systems, Arctic summer sea ice, Arctic winter sea ice, and Barents sea ice. Except for the monsoon systems, we found abrupt shifts in all of these across multiple models. Despite large inter-model variations, higher levels of global warming consistently increase the risk of abrupt shifts in CMIP6 models. At a global warming of 1.5°C, six out of 10 studied climate subsystems already show large-scale abrupt shifts across multiple models.
{"title":"Assessment of Abrupt Shifts in CMIP6 Models Using Edge Detection","authors":"Sjoerd Terpstra, Swinda K. J. Falkena, Robbin Bastiaansen, Sebastian Bathiany, Henk A. Dijkstra, Anna S. von der Heydt","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001698","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001698","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Past research has shown that multiple climate subsystems might undergo abrupt shifts, such as the Arctic Winter sea ice or the Amazon rainforest, but there are large uncertainties regarding their timing and spatial extent. In this study we investigated when and where abrupt shifts occur in the latest generation of earth system models (CMIP6) under a scenario of 1% annual increase in CO<sub>2</sub>. We considered 82 ocean, atmosphere, and land variables across 57 models. We used a Canny edge detection method to identify abrupt shifts occurring on yearly to decadal timescales, and performed a connected component analysis to quantify the spatial extent of these shifts. The systems analyzed include the North Atlantic subpolar gyre, Tibetan Plateau, land permafrost, Amazon rainforest, Antarctic sea ice, monsoon systems, Arctic summer sea ice, Arctic winter sea ice, and Barents sea ice. Except for the monsoon systems, we found abrupt shifts in all of these across multiple models. Despite large inter-model variations, higher levels of global warming consistently increase the risk of abrupt shifts in CMIP6 models. At a global warming of 1.5°C, six out of 10 studied climate subsystems already show large-scale abrupt shifts across multiple models.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001698","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144367402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Scott R. Saleska, Steven C. Wofsy, David Battisti, William E. Easterling, Christopher Field, Inez Fung, James E. Hansen, John Harte, Daniel Kirk-Davidoff, Pamela A. Matson, James C. McWilliams, Jonathan T. Overpeck, Joellen Russell, John M. Wallace
The greenhouse gas “endangerment finding” of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), established in 2009 after a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case (Massachusetts vs. EPA) in which we participated as amicus curiae (friends of the court), has become the basis for U.S. regulation of greenhouse gases in the years since. The current Administration of President Donald Trump is now seeking its repeal. Here, we review the role climate science played in that 2006 case, and how the scientific evidence that undergirds the endangerment finding has gotten stronger in the 16 years since. Finally, we consider what will be the fate of the endangerment finding—and indeed that of role of science in contributing to policy—in light of the current challenging environment for science in the U.S.
{"title":"What Is Endangered Now? Climate Science at the Crossroads","authors":"Scott R. Saleska, Steven C. Wofsy, David Battisti, William E. Easterling, Christopher Field, Inez Fung, James E. Hansen, John Harte, Daniel Kirk-Davidoff, Pamela A. Matson, James C. McWilliams, Jonathan T. Overpeck, Joellen Russell, John M. Wallace","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001808","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001808","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The greenhouse gas “endangerment finding” of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), established in 2009 after a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case (Massachusetts vs. EPA) in which we participated as amicus curiae (friends of the court), has become the basis for U.S. regulation of greenhouse gases in the years since. The current Administration of President Donald Trump is now seeking its repeal. Here, we review the role climate science played in that 2006 case, and how the scientific evidence that undergirds the endangerment finding has gotten stronger in the 16 years since. Finally, we consider what will be the fate of the endangerment finding—and indeed that of role of science in contributing to policy—in light of the current challenging environment for science in the U.S.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001808","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144315371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vinh Ngoc Tran, Taeho Kim, Donghui Xu, Hoang Tran, Manh-Hung Le, Thanh-Nhan-Duc Tran, Jongho Kim, Trung Duc Tran, Daniel B. Wright, Pedro Restrepo, Valeriy Y. Ivanov
Accurate flood early warnings are critical to minimize damage and loss of life. Current large-scale operational forecasting systems, however, have limited accuracy, description of uncertainty, and computational efficiency. While Artificial intelligence (AI) can address these limitations in principle, the accuracy and reliability of AI forecasts have thus far proven insufficient. Here we present a novel hybrid framework that integrates AI-based machinery termed Errorcastnet (ECN) with the National Water Model (NWM) to showcase the potential of ensemble AI flood forecasts over the contiguous U.S. ECN boosts prediction accuracy four- to six-fold across lead times of 1–10 days, while providing uncertainty quantification. It also outperforms Google's state-of-the-art global AI model. ECN-based forecasts offer superior economic value (up to four-fold) for decision-making as compared to those from NWM alone. ECN performs well in varied ecoregions, physiography, and land management conditions. The framework is computationally efficient, enabling national-scale ensemble forecasts in minutes.
{"title":"AI Improves the Accuracy, Reliability, and Economic Value of Continental-Scale Flood Predictions","authors":"Vinh Ngoc Tran, Taeho Kim, Donghui Xu, Hoang Tran, Manh-Hung Le, Thanh-Nhan-Duc Tran, Jongho Kim, Trung Duc Tran, Daniel B. Wright, Pedro Restrepo, Valeriy Y. Ivanov","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001678","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001678","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate flood early warnings are critical to minimize damage and loss of life. Current large-scale operational forecasting systems, however, have limited accuracy, description of uncertainty, and computational efficiency. While Artificial intelligence (AI) can address these limitations in principle, the accuracy and reliability of AI forecasts have thus far proven insufficient. Here we present a novel hybrid framework that integrates AI-based machinery termed Errorcastnet (ECN) with the National Water Model (NWM) to showcase the potential of ensemble AI flood forecasts over the contiguous U.S. ECN boosts prediction accuracy four- to six-fold across lead times of 1–10 days, while providing uncertainty quantification. It also outperforms Google's state-of-the-art global AI model. ECN-based forecasts offer superior economic value (up to four-fold) for decision-making as compared to those from NWM alone. ECN performs well in varied ecoregions, physiography, and land management conditions. The framework is computationally efficient, enabling national-scale ensemble forecasts in minutes.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001678","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144315372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ivan D. Osorio-Leon, Daniella M. Rempe, Jon K. Golla, Julien Bouchez, Jennifer L. Druhan
In upland environments, roots commonly extend deep below soil into partially saturated bedrock. This Bedrock Vadose Zone (BVZ) has been shown to store and circulate water, host organic carbon respiration and serve as a critical source of rock-derived nutrients. However, the extent to which deep roots influence chemical weathering rates remains poorly understood. Here, we report 4 years of depth-resolved major ion chemistry over a 16-m thick BVZ hosting a deep rhizosphere in a catchment subject to a Mediterranean climate. These data allow development and validation of a reactive transport model (RTM), revealing that the timescales of water storage and drainage in the BVZ are sufficient to facilitate substantial chemical weathering of the shale bedrock. However, observed solute concentrations are only reproduced by the RTM when we explicitly include measured rates of