Scott R. Saleska, Steven C. Wofsy, David Battisti, William E. Easterling, Christopher Field, Inez Fung, James E. Hansen, John Harte, Daniel Kirk-Davidoff, Pamela A. Matson, James C. McWilliams, Jonathan T. Overpeck, Joellen Russell, John M. Wallace
The greenhouse gas “endangerment finding” of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), established in 2009 after a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case (Massachusetts vs. EPA) in which we participated as amicus curiae (friends of the court), has become the basis for U.S. regulation of greenhouse gases in the years since. The current Administration of President Donald Trump is now seeking its repeal. Here, we review the role climate science played in that 2006 case, and how the scientific evidence that undergirds the endangerment finding has gotten stronger in the 16 years since. Finally, we consider what will be the fate of the endangerment finding—and indeed that of role of science in contributing to policy—in light of the current challenging environment for science in the U.S.
{"title":"What Is Endangered Now? Climate Science at the Crossroads","authors":"Scott R. Saleska, Steven C. Wofsy, David Battisti, William E. Easterling, Christopher Field, Inez Fung, James E. Hansen, John Harte, Daniel Kirk-Davidoff, Pamela A. Matson, James C. McWilliams, Jonathan T. Overpeck, Joellen Russell, John M. Wallace","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001808","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001808","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The greenhouse gas “endangerment finding” of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), established in 2009 after a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case (Massachusetts vs. EPA) in which we participated as amicus curiae (friends of the court), has become the basis for U.S. regulation of greenhouse gases in the years since. The current Administration of President Donald Trump is now seeking its repeal. Here, we review the role climate science played in that 2006 case, and how the scientific evidence that undergirds the endangerment finding has gotten stronger in the 16 years since. Finally, we consider what will be the fate of the endangerment finding—and indeed that of role of science in contributing to policy—in light of the current challenging environment for science in the U.S.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001808","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144315371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vinh Ngoc Tran, Taeho Kim, Donghui Xu, Hoang Tran, Manh-Hung Le, Thanh-Nhan-Duc Tran, Jongho Kim, Trung Duc Tran, Daniel B. Wright, Pedro Restrepo, Valeriy Y. Ivanov
Accurate flood early warnings are critical to minimize damage and loss of life. Current large-scale operational forecasting systems, however, have limited accuracy, description of uncertainty, and computational efficiency. While Artificial intelligence (AI) can address these limitations in principle, the accuracy and reliability of AI forecasts have thus far proven insufficient. Here we present a novel hybrid framework that integrates AI-based machinery termed Errorcastnet (ECN) with the National Water Model (NWM) to showcase the potential of ensemble AI flood forecasts over the contiguous U.S. ECN boosts prediction accuracy four- to six-fold across lead times of 1–10 days, while providing uncertainty quantification. It also outperforms Google's state-of-the-art global AI model. ECN-based forecasts offer superior economic value (up to four-fold) for decision-making as compared to those from NWM alone. ECN performs well in varied ecoregions, physiography, and land management conditions. The framework is computationally efficient, enabling national-scale ensemble forecasts in minutes.
{"title":"AI Improves the Accuracy, Reliability, and Economic Value of Continental-Scale Flood Predictions","authors":"Vinh Ngoc Tran, Taeho Kim, Donghui Xu, Hoang Tran, Manh-Hung Le, Thanh-Nhan-Duc Tran, Jongho Kim, Trung Duc Tran, Daniel B. Wright, Pedro Restrepo, Valeriy Y. Ivanov","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001678","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001678","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate flood early warnings are critical to minimize damage and loss of life. Current large-scale operational forecasting systems, however, have limited accuracy, description of uncertainty, and computational efficiency. While Artificial intelligence (AI) can address these limitations in principle, the accuracy and reliability of AI forecasts have thus far proven insufficient. Here we present a novel hybrid framework that integrates AI-based machinery termed Errorcastnet (ECN) with the National Water Model (NWM) to showcase the potential of ensemble AI flood forecasts over the contiguous U.S. ECN boosts prediction accuracy four- to six-fold across lead times of 1–10 days, while providing uncertainty quantification. It also outperforms Google's state-of-the-art global AI model. ECN-based forecasts offer superior economic value (up to four-fold) for decision-making as compared to those from NWM alone. ECN performs well in varied ecoregions, physiography, and land management conditions. The framework is computationally efficient, enabling national-scale ensemble forecasts in minutes.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001678","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144315372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ivan D. Osorio-Leon, Daniella M. Rempe, Jon K. Golla, Julien Bouchez, Jennifer L. Druhan
In upland environments, roots commonly extend deep below soil into partially saturated bedrock. This Bedrock Vadose Zone (BVZ) has been shown to store and circulate water, host organic carbon respiration and serve as a critical source of rock-derived nutrients. However, the extent to which deep roots influence chemical weathering rates remains poorly understood. Here, we report 4 years of depth-resolved major ion chemistry over a 16-m thick BVZ hosting a deep rhizosphere in a catchment subject to a Mediterranean climate. These data allow development and validation of a reactive transport model (RTM), revealing that the timescales of water storage and drainage in the BVZ are sufficient to facilitate substantial chemical weathering of the shale bedrock. However, observed solute concentrations are only reproduced by the RTM when we explicitly include measured rates of