Christopher D. Traill, Tyler Rohr, Elizabeth Shadwick, Christina Schallenberg, Michael Ellwood, Andrew Bowie
In the Subantarctic Southern Ocean, primary productivity is predominantly limited by seasonal changes in light and iron (Fe) availability, shaping the phytoplankton community and impacting the magnitude of the biological carbon pump. However, quantifying the seasonal iron cycle is challenging, as observations of bioavailable, dissolved iron (DFe) from individual campaigns rarely span a full seasonal cycle. Here, we present a composite seasonal cycle constructed from 27 years of DFe observations at the subantarctic Southern Ocean Time Series (SOTS) south of Australia. Iron measurements are paired with time series data to explain the iron cycle contextualized to broader Southern Ocean biogeochemistry. Three distinct phases were revealed with clear coupling between iron and productivity in the first two phases. In the first phase, light limitation initially controls spring to summer primary production with shoaling of the mixed layer, accounting for around half of annual net community production (ANCP). In the second phase and remaining half of ANCP, rapid biomass increases and near-complete drawdown of DFe drive iron limitation, evidenced by maximum fluorescence-to-chlorophyll ratios. A subset of this period covering a third of ANCP exhibits a mean Fe:C uptake ratio of 31.08 ± 8.88 μmol:mol. During the third phase, iron is weakly coupled to productivity as the system transitions to net heterotrophy and biomass declines despite increased Fe supply associated with the east Australian current system. Together, 27 years of continuous monitoring draws a comprehensive picture of how and when iron fuels subantarctic productivity, providing a critical baseline for model validation and continued monitoring in a rapidly changing climate.
{"title":"Coupling Between the Subantarctic Seasonal Iron Cycle and Productivity at the Southern Ocean Time Series (SOTS)","authors":"Christopher D. Traill, Tyler Rohr, Elizabeth Shadwick, Christina Schallenberg, Michael Ellwood, Andrew Bowie","doi":"10.1029/2024AV001599","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2024AV001599","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the Subantarctic Southern Ocean, primary productivity is predominantly limited by seasonal changes in light and iron (Fe) availability, shaping the phytoplankton community and impacting the magnitude of the biological carbon pump. However, quantifying the seasonal iron cycle is challenging, as observations of bioavailable, dissolved iron (DFe) from individual campaigns rarely span a full seasonal cycle. Here, we present a composite seasonal cycle constructed from 27 years of DFe observations at the subantarctic Southern Ocean Time Series (SOTS) south of Australia. Iron measurements are paired with time series data to explain the iron cycle contextualized to broader Southern Ocean biogeochemistry. Three distinct phases were revealed with clear coupling between iron and productivity in the first two phases. In the first phase, light limitation initially controls spring to summer primary production with shoaling of the mixed layer, accounting for around half of annual net community production (ANCP). In the second phase and remaining half of ANCP, rapid biomass increases and near-complete drawdown of DFe drive iron limitation, evidenced by maximum fluorescence-to-chlorophyll ratios. A subset of this period covering a third of ANCP exhibits a mean Fe:C uptake ratio of 31.08 ± 8.88 μmol:mol. During the third phase, iron is weakly coupled to productivity as the system transitions to net heterotrophy and biomass declines despite increased Fe supply associated with the east Australian current system. Together, 27 years of continuous monitoring draws a comprehensive picture of how and when iron fuels subantarctic productivity, providing a critical baseline for model validation and continued monitoring in a rapidly changing climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024AV001599","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thorsten Mauritsen, Yoko Tsushima, Benoit Meyssignac, Norman G. Loeb, Maria Hakuba, Peter Pilewskie, Jason Cole, Kentaroh Suzuki, Thomas P. Ackerman, Richard P. Allan, Timothy Andrews, Frida A.-M. Bender, Jonah Bloch-Johnson, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Anca Brookshaw, Paulo Ceppi, Nicolas Clerbaux, Andrew E. Dessler, Aaron Donohoe, Jean-Louis Dufresne, Veronika Eyring, Kirsten L. Findell, Andrew Gettelman, Jake J. Gristey, Ed Hawkins, Patrick Heimbach, Helene T. Hewitt, Nadir Jeevanjee, Colin Jones, Sarah M. Kang, Seiji Kato, Jennifer E. Kay, Stephen A. Klein, Reto Knutti, Ryan Kramer, June-Yi Lee, Daniel T. McCoy, Brian Medeiros, Linda Megner, Angshuman Modak, Tomoo Ogura, Matthew D. Palmer, David Paynter, Johannes Quaas, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Mark Ringer, Karina von Schuckmann, Steven Sherwood, Bjorn Stevens, Ivy Tan, George Tselioudis, Rowan Sutton, Aiko Voigt, Masahiro Watanabe, Mark J. Webb, Martin Wild, Mark D. Zelinka
Global warming results from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which upset the delicate balance between the incoming sunlight, and the reflected and emitted radiation from Earth. The imbalance leads to energy accumulation in the atmosphere, oceans and land, and melting of the cryosphere, resulting in increasing temperatures, rising sea levels, and more extreme weather around the globe. Despite the fundamental role of the energy imbalance in regulating the climate system, as known to humanity for more than two centuries, our capacity to observe it is rapidly deteriorating as satellites are being decommissioned.
{"title":"Earth's Energy Imbalance More Than Doubled in Recent Decades","authors":"Thorsten Mauritsen, Yoko Tsushima, Benoit Meyssignac, Norman G. Loeb, Maria Hakuba, Peter Pilewskie, Jason Cole, Kentaroh Suzuki, Thomas P. Ackerman, Richard P. Allan, Timothy Andrews, Frida A.-M. Bender, Jonah Bloch-Johnson, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Anca Brookshaw, Paulo Ceppi, Nicolas Clerbaux, Andrew E. Dessler, Aaron Donohoe, Jean-Louis Dufresne, Veronika Eyring, Kirsten L. Findell, Andrew Gettelman, Jake J. Gristey, Ed Hawkins, Patrick Heimbach, Helene T. Hewitt, Nadir Jeevanjee, Colin Jones, Sarah M. Kang, Seiji Kato, Jennifer E. Kay, Stephen A. Klein, Reto Knutti, Ryan Kramer, June-Yi Lee, Daniel T. McCoy, Brian Medeiros, Linda Megner, Angshuman Modak, Tomoo Ogura, Matthew D. Palmer, David Paynter, Johannes Quaas, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Mark Ringer, Karina von Schuckmann, Steven Sherwood, Bjorn Stevens, Ivy Tan, George Tselioudis, Rowan Sutton, Aiko Voigt, Masahiro Watanabe, Mark J. Webb, Martin Wild, Mark D. Zelinka","doi":"10.1029/2024AV001636","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2024AV001636","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global warming results from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which upset the delicate balance between the incoming sunlight, and the reflected and emitted radiation from Earth. The imbalance leads to energy accumulation in the atmosphere, oceans and land, and melting of the cryosphere, resulting in increasing temperatures, rising sea levels, and more extreme weather around the globe. Despite the fundamental role of the energy imbalance in regulating the climate system, as known to humanity for more than two centuries, our capacity to observe it is rapidly deteriorating as satellites are being decommissioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024AV001636","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143930432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>In 2021, shortly after President Joe Biden and Vice-President Kamala Harris took office, I was invited to join the administration as the Director of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Science (SC)—to oversee the office responsible for advancing scientific research that shapes our understanding of nature and is pivotal for advancing the energy, economic, and national security of the United States. This executive position, known internally as SC-1, requires a Presidential nomination and US Senate confirmation.</p><p>After a 15-month-long process of interviews, vetting, and lots of paperwork, my nomination was approved by the US Senate in May 2022, and I embarked on a unique role in national science leadership. As the first earth scientist and person of color to hold this important scientific leadership position in the United States, I knew I would bring a unique perspective to the role. By embracing this opportunity, I not only made history but also contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge for the benefit of society.</p><p>My journey to scientific leadership started far from the corridors of the US federal government, halfway across the world in Eritrea. I entered and “grew up” in the world of DOE while pursuing graduate education in earth sciences, at the University of California, Berkeley, where I was fortunate to be co-advised by Dr. Margaret S. Torn, a renowned scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). At LBNL, I gained valuable insights into the national laboratories, user facilities, and the broader DOE scientific ecosystem. Since then, I have been a user of multiple user facilities, secured funding from the DOE, collaborated with scientists from several national laboratories, and mentored scientists who have since secured professional appointments in DOE national laboratories.</p><p>At the time of my appointment to the DOE role, I held the positions of Professor of Soil Biogeochemistry; Ted and Jan Falasco Chair in Earth Sciences and Geology; and Associate Dean for Graduate Education at the University of California, Merced. I am a trained biogeochemist and political ecologist. A central theme of my work has been understanding the critical role that soil plays in regulating the Earth's climate. Over the years, I worked on advancing our understanding of organic matter dynamics in the soil system, response of key soil processes to environmental change, and human-soil relationships. In addition, I actively participated in on numerous national and international scholarly activities and committees, including those convened by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, State of California, and the United Nations. Further, I championed efforts to broaden participation in STEM, recognizing its essential role in fostering a more innovative and just scientific enterprise. My experiences as a scientist, educator, academic leader, and science policy contributor were instrumental in prepari
该办公室的长期优先事项是通过与科学界协商确定的,科学界由联邦咨询委员会和每个主要项目公共论坛的与会者代表。但是,除了长期研究方向外,每个办事处通常还根据具体的国家优先事项采取其他主动行动。在我任职期间,我们推进了现有的项目和计划,并启动了新的项目和计划。举几个例子,来自《减少通货膨胀法》的支持允许SC推进正在进行的设施升级和重大项目,例如支持正在进行的从伊利诺伊州费米实验室延伸到南达科他州的长基线中微子设施(LBNF-DUNE)的深地下中微子实验的建设;布鲁克海文国家实验室电子离子对撞机的建造;在阿贡领导计算设施(位于阿贡国家实验室)、橡树岭领导计算设施(位于橡树岭国家实验室)和劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室的国家能源研究科学计算中心推进科学计算研究项目;继续支持美国参与ITER(国际核聚变研究和工程大型项目)等等。《芯片与科学法案》授权增加SC预算,并与能源部其他部门、联邦机构和私营部门建立伙伴关系,以提高美国半导体制造的科学和能力。此外,我在SC的时间包括主要项目的启动和完成,包括启动百亿亿次计算时代(橡树岭国家实验室的前沿超级计算机),世界上最强大的x射线激光器(直线加速器相干光源,斯坦福大学的LCLS-II, SLAC国家加速器实验室),以及启动综合研究基础设施(IRI),以及与托马斯杰斐逊国家加速器设施和LBNL合作的高性能数据设施(HPDF)项目。此外,在2022年实现聚变点火方面取得了长期寻求的突破,导致联邦政府对聚变能研究的支持增加。在与地球和环境科学相关的领域,应对气候危机的紧迫性日益增加,需要扩大气候和清洁能源方面的重要研究和应用工作,包括启动能源部范围内的“能源地球shotstm”,以及与受影响社区合作应对气候变化危机的其他新方法。我作为SC-1的角色是真正令人兴奋的,卓越的,令人难以置信的令人满意的服务,为我深深关心的科学和社区服务。这个职位需要科学专业知识、战略眼光和领导技能的结合。我经常把它描述为要求一个人拥有或发展一种独特的管理、科学、会计、法律、消防队长、调解、道德指导和啦啦队技能的混合——所需的具体技能可能会根据当天和新出现的问题而变化,因此无法预测何时需要一种或多种技能。在做这份工作时,我坚持了自己的领导哲学,这种哲学植根于谦逊、正直、卓越和对不同观点的深刻尊重等基本原则。作为科学办公室主任,我有幸为科学家们的工作提供支持和欢呼,因为他们追求突破性的、基础的科学探索,不断推进知识的前沿——许多人认为这是不可能的,或者是具有挑战性的。虽然我的职责是领导一个负责管理基础研究的办公室,但SC支持的许多科学家、工具和发现已经继续为国家、地球和人类的变革性技术的发展做出贡献。考虑到现在太阳能电池板的广泛应用,电池技术的进步,人工智能和高性能计算的快速发展及其在广泛领域的应用,更准确地模拟气候系统的能力,以及我们所依赖的更多技术。所有这些都得益于科学办公室几十年来所倡导的对基础研究的支持。美国能源部和美国科技部生态系统其他部门的科学家迅速聚集在一起,利用科学用户办公室的设施(包括光源和高性能计算系统)推进了对COVID-19病毒性质和特性的重要了解,并加快了疫苗和治疗方法的开发,这一点比其他任何地方都更能体现基础研究长期投资的价值。支持发展蓬勃发展的STEM劳动力是SC和类似联邦资助机构为确保美国长期经济竞争力做出贡献的另一种重要方式。 几十年来的研究表明,在所有人群中,STEM方面的才能和能力是平等分布的,但获得对STEM成功至关重要的资源和机会却并非如此。SC-1等职位的重要职责之一是确保没有任何社区被排除在公共资助的科研企业之外。因此,我在这份工作上的重要任务之一就是为美国最聪明的人扩大接触STEM的机会,无论他们的背景或地理位置如何。这意味着要想办法挖掘全国尚未开发的人才库,以扩大科学成就。统计数据显示,在很大一部分美国人口中,有限的资源获取如何阻碍了STEM参与的机会,这令人沮丧,也很有启发性。根据美国物理学会(APS)的一份报告(Quider et al., 2023),在接受联邦研究经费的637所大学中,排名前22%的大学获得了90%的联邦研发资源。相比之下,新兴研究机构(ERIs)为57%的学生提供服务,其中包括68%的佩尔助学金获得者,它们只需要争夺10%的联邦研发资金。作为SC-1,我有责任解决结构性不平等问题,确保托付给SC的联邦资源(即资金和使用用户设施)对每个美国人都可用,无论他们在哪里工作或学习,并扩大STEM帐篷。在SC,这包括努力扩大SC资助服务的机构范围。我们增加了提交促进包容性和公平研究计划的要求(PIER计划,类似于美国国家科学基金会的更广泛的影响,其中包括鼓励大型大学和实验室的研究人员与ERIs合作);确保来自不同地区和不同类型机构的学者在联邦咨询委员会中有代表性,这些委员会有助于为STEM制定研究议程,并与历史上很少或根本没有获得联邦STEM资助的机构进行直接联系;并为项目经理建立办公时间,以便他们能够有效地回应新申请人(主要研究人员和机构代表)的询问,特别是那些来自对SC和/或DOE资助机制有限或不熟悉的机构的询问。这些努力增加了STEM的劳动力,带来了新的想法,并在战略上加速了科学创新和进步。这些努力对于挖掘国家的全方位人才至关重要,这些人才对于当今世界的全球STEM竞争力至关重要。不出所料,我担任的政府高层职位有时也会遇到一些挑战。我被委托管理大量预算,监督多个项目中复杂的研究计划,与许多不同的利益相关者打交道,他们通常有不同的利益。为了履行我作为SC-1的职责,我与一个拥有多种技能的优秀领导团队一起工作——战略领导、战术执行、有效的人员管理、沟通技巧等等——以驾驭复杂的科学、法律、监管和政治格局。只要有可能,我就会在我的决定中寻求平衡,以满足利益相关者的需求和相互竞争的需求,提供道德指导,解决冲突,同时保持对更广泛的科学企业目标的明确关注,并忠于我的核心原则。SC-1的角色也要求做出重大的个人牺牲。最重要的是,为了完成这份工作,我必须经常离开我的家人。此外,联邦指导方针严格限制担任高级行政职务的个人,特别是政治任命的个人的活动。对于在拜登-哈里斯政府中过渡到政府角色的科学家来说,这意味着与我们国内的学术机构、正在进行的研究、学员和合作项目完全分离。我不得不退出许多学术活动,甚至在我开始担任政府职务之前所做的科学工作也失去了信誉。对于活跃的科学家来说,这种转变尤其具有挑战性,他们希望在完成政府服务后重返学术岗位。此外,与大多数人相比,来自STEM历史上少数群体的科学领袖往往有不同的经历。在许多方面,进入政府服务可能类似于穿越有时孤独和危险的障碍(Berhe et al., 2022),而不是直接的职业发展——这与来自少数族裔社区的学者在学术界面临的情况没有什么不同。 这可能涉及有限的榜样和支持;定期的(有时是不公平的)公众监督;对自己的专业知识、潜力和工作不断提出质疑;我们的工作和成就得不到表扬。然而,尽管存在这些和其他挑战,但塑造国家科学优先事项和扩大不同背景的人参与STEM的机会使这项工作变得充实。在办公室的支持下,解决跨各个领域的复杂科学挑战需要合作、外交和宣传。我把我的精力投入到成为我所能成为的最好的科学领导者和倡导
{"title":"A Soil Scientist Goes to Washington: Navigating the Path to National Science Leadership","authors":"Asmeret Asefaw Berhe","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001757","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001757","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2021, shortly after President Joe Biden and Vice-President Kamala Harris took office, I was invited to join the administration as the Director of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Science (SC)—to oversee the office responsible for advancing scientific research that shapes our understanding of nature and is pivotal for advancing the energy, economic, and national security of the United States. This executive position, known internally as SC-1, requires a Presidential nomination and US Senate confirmation.</p><p>After a 15-month-long process of interviews, vetting, and lots of paperwork, my nomination was approved by the US Senate in May 2022, and I embarked on a unique role in national science leadership. As the first earth scientist and person of color to hold this important scientific leadership position in the United States, I knew I would bring a unique perspective to the role. By embracing this opportunity, I not only made history but also contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge for the benefit of society.</p><p>My journey to scientific leadership started far from the corridors of the US federal government, halfway across the world in Eritrea. I entered and “grew up” in the world of DOE while pursuing graduate education in earth sciences, at the University of California, Berkeley, where I was fortunate to be co-advised by Dr. Margaret S. Torn, a renowned scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). At LBNL, I gained valuable insights into the national laboratories, user facilities, and the broader DOE scientific ecosystem. Since then, I have been a user of multiple user facilities, secured funding from the DOE, collaborated with scientists from several national laboratories, and mentored scientists who have since secured professional appointments in DOE national laboratories.</p><p>At the time of my appointment to the DOE role, I held the positions of Professor of Soil Biogeochemistry; Ted and Jan Falasco Chair in Earth Sciences and Geology; and Associate Dean for Graduate Education at the University of California, Merced. I am a trained biogeochemist and political ecologist. A central theme of my work has been understanding the critical role that soil plays in regulating the Earth's climate. Over the years, I worked on advancing our understanding of organic matter dynamics in the soil system, response of key soil processes to environmental change, and human-soil relationships. In addition, I actively participated in on numerous national and international scholarly activities and committees, including those convened by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, State of California, and the United Nations. Further, I championed efforts to broaden participation in STEM, recognizing its essential role in fostering a more innovative and just scientific enterprise. My experiences as a scientist, educator, academic leader, and science policy contributor were instrumental in prepari","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001757","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143930434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julia A. Jones, Christopher Daly, Mark Schulze, Christopher J. Stlll
An issue of global concern is how climate change forcing is transmitted to ecosystems. Forest ecosystems in mountain landscapes may demonstrate buffering and perhaps decoupling of long-term rates of temperature change, because vegetation, topography, and local winds (e.g., cold air pooling) influence temperature and potentially create microclimate refugia (areas which are relatively protected from climate change). We tested these ideas by comparing 45-year regional rates of air temperature change to unique temporal and spatial air temperature records in the understory of regionally representative stable old forest at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA. The 45-year seasonal patterns and rates of warming were similar throughout the forested landscape and matched regional rates observed at 88 standard meteorological stations in Oregon and Washington, indicating buffering, but not decoupling of long-term climate change rates. Consideration of the energy balance explains these results: while shading and airflows produce spatial patterns of temperature, these processes do not counteract global increases in air temperature driven by increased downward, longwave radiation forced by increased anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. In some months, the 45-year warming in the forest understory equaled or exceeded spatial differences of air temperature between the understory and the canopy or canopy openings and was comparable to temperature change over 1,000 m elevation, while in other months there has been little change. These findings have global implications because they indicate that microclimate refugia are transient, even in this forested mountain landscape.
{"title":"Microclimate Refugia Are Transient in Stable Old Forests, Pacific Northwest, USA","authors":"Julia A. Jones, Christopher Daly, Mark Schulze, Christopher J. Stlll","doi":"10.1029/2024AV001492","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2024AV001492","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An issue of global concern is how climate change forcing is transmitted to ecosystems. Forest ecosystems in mountain landscapes may demonstrate buffering and perhaps decoupling of long-term rates of temperature change, because vegetation, topography, and local winds (e.g., cold air pooling) influence temperature and potentially create microclimate refugia (areas which are relatively protected from climate change). We tested these ideas by comparing 45-year regional rates of air temperature change to unique temporal and spatial air temperature records in the understory of regionally representative stable old forest at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA. The 45-year seasonal patterns and rates of warming were similar throughout the forested landscape and matched regional rates observed at 88 standard meteorological stations in Oregon and Washington, indicating buffering, but not decoupling of long-term climate change rates. Consideration of the energy balance explains these results: while shading and airflows produce spatial patterns of temperature, these processes do not counteract global increases in air temperature driven by increased downward, longwave radiation forced by increased anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. In some months, the 45-year warming in the forest understory equaled or exceeded spatial differences of air temperature between the understory and the canopy or canopy openings and was comparable to temperature change over 1,000 m elevation, while in other months there has been little change. These findings have global implications because they indicate that microclimate refugia are transient, even in this forested mountain landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024AV001492","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143892855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Extratropical storms dominate midlatitude climate and weather and are known to grow baroclinically and decay barotropically. Traditionally, quantitative climatic measures of storm activity have been mostly based on Eulerian measures, taking into account the mean state of the atmosphere and how those affect Eulerian eddy activity, but they do not consider the Lagrangian growth of the storms themselves. Here, using ERA-5 reanalysis data and tracking all extratropical storms (cyclones and anticyclones) from 83 years of data, we examine the actual growth of the storms and compare it to the Eulerian characteristics of the background state as the storms develop. In the limit of weak baroclinicity, we find that baroclinicity provides a good measure for storm maximum intensity. However, this monotonic relationship breaks for high baroclinicity levels. We show that although the actual growth rate of individual storms monotonically increases with baroclinicity, the reduction in maximum intensity at high baroclinicity is caused by a decrease in storm growth time. Based on the Lagrangian analysis, we suggest a nonlinear correction to the traditional linear connection between baroclinicity and storms' activity. Then, we show that a simplified model of storm growth, incorporating the baroclinicity effect on the vertical tilt of anomalies, reproduces the observed nonlinear relationship. Expanding the analysis to include the mean flow's barotropic properties highlights their marginal effect on storm growth rate, but the crucial impact on growth time. Our results emphasize the potential of Lagrangianly studying storm dynamics to advance understanding of the midlatitude climate.
{"title":"A Lagrangian Perspective on the Growth of Midlatitude Storms","authors":"Or Hadas, Yohai Kaspi","doi":"10.1029/2024AV001555","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2024AV001555","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extratropical storms dominate midlatitude climate and weather and are known to grow baroclinically and decay barotropically. Traditionally, quantitative climatic measures of storm activity have been mostly based on Eulerian measures, taking into account the mean state of the atmosphere and how those affect Eulerian eddy activity, but they do not consider the Lagrangian growth of the storms themselves. Here, using ERA-5 reanalysis data and tracking all extratropical storms (cyclones and anticyclones) from 83 years of data, we examine the actual growth of the storms and compare it to the Eulerian characteristics of the background state as the storms develop. In the limit of weak baroclinicity, we find that baroclinicity provides a good measure for storm maximum intensity. However, this monotonic relationship breaks for high baroclinicity levels. We show that although the actual growth rate of individual storms monotonically increases with baroclinicity, the reduction in maximum intensity at high baroclinicity is caused by a decrease in storm growth time. Based on the Lagrangian analysis, we suggest a nonlinear correction to the traditional linear connection between baroclinicity and storms' activity. Then, we show that a simplified model of storm growth, incorporating the baroclinicity effect on the vertical tilt of anomalies, reproduces the observed nonlinear relationship. Expanding the analysis to include the mean flow's barotropic properties highlights their marginal effect on storm growth rate, but the crucial impact on growth time. Our results emphasize the potential of Lagrangianly studying storm dynamics to advance understanding of the midlatitude climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024AV001555","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143889027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yu Liu, Dominick V. Spracklen, Douglas J. Parker, Joseph Holden, Jun Ge, Weidong Guo
The Amazon has experienced extensive deforestation in recent decades, causing substantial impacts on local and regional climate. However, the precipitation response to this recent forest cover change remains unclear. Here, we examined biophysical effects of forest cover change in the Brazilian Amazon on dry season precipitation using a regional coupled climate model with embedded water vapor tracers. We find that the 3.2% mean reduction in forest cover that occurred in Rondônia and Mato Grosso during 2002–2015 caused a 3.5 ± 0.8% reduction in evapotranspiration and a 5.4 ± 4.4% reduction in precipitation. The reduction in evapotranspiration warmed and dried the lower atmosphere reducing convection and precipitation. Reductions in incoming moisture, dominated by reduced moisture inflow in the mid-troposphere, accounted for 25% of the total reduction in moisture and amplified the precipitation response to forest loss. The reduction in precipitation efficiency explains 84.5% of the reduction in precipitation with the remainder due to reductions in precipitable water. The reduced precipitation sourced from water vapor inflow accounts for 76.9% of the simulated precipitation reduction, with the remaining 23.1% due to reduced local evapotranspiration. Our study demonstrates substantial reductions in dry season precipitation due to recent forest cover change in the Amazon, highlighting the importance of atmospheric responses to land cover change in this region.
{"title":"Recent Forest Loss in the Brazilian Amazon Causes Substantial Reductions in Dry Season Precipitation","authors":"Yu Liu, Dominick V. Spracklen, Douglas J. Parker, Joseph Holden, Jun Ge, Weidong Guo","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001670","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2025AV001670","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Amazon has experienced extensive deforestation in recent decades, causing substantial impacts on local and regional climate. However, the precipitation response to this recent forest cover change remains unclear. Here, we examined biophysical effects of forest cover change in the Brazilian Amazon on dry season precipitation using a regional coupled climate model with embedded water vapor tracers. We find that the 3.2% mean reduction in forest cover that occurred in Rondônia and Mato Grosso during 2002–2015 caused a 3.5 ± 0.8% reduction in evapotranspiration and a 5.4 ± 4.4% reduction in precipitation. The reduction in evapotranspiration warmed and dried the lower atmosphere reducing convection and precipitation. Reductions in incoming moisture, dominated by reduced moisture inflow in the mid-troposphere, accounted for 25% of the total reduction in moisture and amplified the precipitation response to forest loss. The reduction in precipitation efficiency explains 84.5% of the reduction in precipitation with the remainder due to reductions in precipitable water. The reduced precipitation sourced from water vapor inflow accounts for 76.9% of the simulated precipitation reduction, with the remaining 23.1% due to reduced local evapotranspiration. Our study demonstrates substantial reductions in dry season precipitation due to recent forest cover change in the Amazon, highlighting the importance of atmospheric responses to land cover change in this region.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001670","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143871859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel L. Evans, Sebastian Doetterl, Nora Gallarotti, Eleanor Georgiadis, Sami Nabhan, Stephan H. Wartenweiler, Timo M. Y. Rhyner, Benedict V. A. Mittelbach, Timothy I. Eglinton, Jordon D. Hemingway, Thomas M. Blattmann
Intensifying effects of global climate change have spurred efforts to enhance carbon sequestration and the long-term storage of soil organic carbon (OC). Current soil carbon models predominantly assume that inputs of OC are biospheric, that is, primarily derived from plant decomposition. However, these overlook the contribution of OC from soil parent material, including petrogenic organic carbon (OCpetro) from OC-bearing (meta-)sedimentary bedrock. To our knowledge, no soil carbon model accounts for the inputs of OCpetro to soils, resulting in significant gaps in our understanding about the roles OCpetro plays in soils. Here, we call for cross-disciplinary research to investigate the transport and stability of OCpetro across the bedrock–soil continuum. We pose four key questions as motivation for this effort. Ignoring the inputs of OCpetro to soils has significant implications, including overestimating biospheric carbon stocks and turnover times. Furthermore, we lack information on the role that OCpetro may play in priming microbial communities, as well as the impacts of land management on OCpetro stocks.
{"title":"The Known Unknowns of Petrogenic Organic Carbon in Soils","authors":"Daniel L. Evans, Sebastian Doetterl, Nora Gallarotti, Eleanor Georgiadis, Sami Nabhan, Stephan H. Wartenweiler, Timo M. Y. Rhyner, Benedict V. A. Mittelbach, Timothy I. Eglinton, Jordon D. Hemingway, Thomas M. Blattmann","doi":"10.1029/2024AV001625","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2024AV001625","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intensifying effects of global climate change have spurred efforts to enhance carbon sequestration and the long-term storage of soil organic carbon (OC). Current soil carbon models predominantly assume that inputs of OC are biospheric, that is, primarily derived from plant decomposition. However, these overlook the contribution of OC from soil parent material, including petrogenic organic carbon (OC<sub>petro</sub>) from OC-bearing (meta-)sedimentary bedrock. To our knowledge, no soil carbon model accounts for the inputs of OC<sub>petro</sub> to soils, resulting in significant gaps in our understanding about the roles OC<sub>petro</sub> plays in soils. Here, we call for cross-disciplinary research to investigate the transport and stability of OC<sub>petro</sub> across the bedrock–soil continuum. We pose four key questions as motivation for this effort. Ignoring the inputs of OC<sub>petro</sub> to soils has significant implications, including overestimating biospheric carbon stocks and turnover times. Furthermore, we lack information on the role that OC<sub>petro</sub> may play in priming microbial communities, as well as the impacts of land management on OC<sub>petro</sub> stocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024AV001625","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143871860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The co-occurrence of multiple hazards is of growing concern globally as the frequency and magnitude of extreme climate events increases. Despite studies examining the spatial distribution of such events, there has been little work in examining if all relevant life threatening and damaging hazards are captured in existing hazard databases and by common hazard metrics. For example, local/regional flash flooding events are seldom captured by optical satellite instruments and are subsequently excluded from global hazard databases. Similarly, the heat hazard definitions most frequently used in multi-hazard studies inherently fail to capture events that are life-threatening but climatologically within an expected range. Our goal is to determine the potential for increasing multi-hazard event detection capabilities by inferring additional hazard footprints from widely accessible satellite data. We use daily precipitation and temperature satellite data to develop an open-source framework that infers additional hazard footprints that are not included in traditional methods. With the state of Texas as our study area, we detected 2.5 times as many flood hazards, equivalent to $320 million in property and crop damages. Furthermore, our expanded heat hazard definition increases the impacted area by 56.6%, equivalent to 91.5 million