<p>Neurons are thought to represent information by spikes, but which specific aspect of spiking activity represents information is debated. Place coding in the mammalian hippocampus provides a useful system for studying forms of neuronal coding. Individual pyramidal cells in the hippocampal CA1 region spike when an exploring rodent is at a particular part of the environment, the “place field” of the cell.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Place cell firing is a “rate code”, where the rate profile is independent of the millisecond timing of individual spikes.</p><p>During locomotion, local field potentials in the rodent hippocampus exhibit rhythmic theta (4–11 Hz) oscillations. In many place fields, the spikes follow a specific temporal pattern: when the animal enters the field, spikes occur at the peak of the theta wave, and subsequent spikes occur at progressively earlier phases.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Knowing the phase in which a spike occurs can indicate where the animal is within the place field. This “phase precession” is an example of a “phase code”, in which the phase of the individual spike with respect to the ongoing theta may carry information beyond the firing rate.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>The observation that both rate and phase codes may carry information about the same parameter in the same neuron provides an opportunity for understanding how these codes are generated. A priori, there are at least three options (Figure 1): a rate code might be somehow converted into a phase code<span><sup>4</sup></span>; a phase code may be converted into a rate code<span><sup>5</sup></span>; or a third, “progenitor” code could generate both.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Work in the past three decades provided evidence for all three possibilities and for various combinations thereof, and numerous models were proposed for generating phase precession.<span><sup>7</sup></span></p><p>We combined electrophysiological recordings with optogenetic manipulations in freely-moving mice to approach the problem of the generation of rate and phase codes in CA1 pyramidal cells. We reasoned that imposing one code on the system may determine whether the codes are interdependent, and possibly constrain the generative mechanisms. Because multiple prior studies suggested that the phase precession observed in CA1 is inherited from other regions,<span><sup>7</sup></span> we chose to impose a rate code on individual pyramidal cells in CA1.</p><p>The induction of an artificial rate code presents several technical challenges. First, we developed hardware to manipulate the activity of individual neurons deep in the brain of freely-moving subjects.<span><sup>8</sup></span> We invented multi-site/multi-colour optoelectronic devices called “diode-probes” in which light from multiple miniature sources is emitted near the recording electrodes. Second, we coupled the activation of CA1 pyramidal cell spiking with the actual kinematics of the mouse. We developed a system called “Spotter
{"title":"The generation of a neuronal phase code for space","authors":"Eran Stark, Hadas E. Sloin","doi":"10.1002/ctm2.70092","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ctm2.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neurons are thought to represent information by spikes, but which specific aspect of spiking activity represents information is debated. Place coding in the mammalian hippocampus provides a useful system for studying forms of neuronal coding. Individual pyramidal cells in the hippocampal CA1 region spike when an exploring rodent is at a particular part of the environment, the “place field” of the cell.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Place cell firing is a “rate code”, where the rate profile is independent of the millisecond timing of individual spikes.</p><p>During locomotion, local field potentials in the rodent hippocampus exhibit rhythmic theta (4–11 Hz) oscillations. In many place fields, the spikes follow a specific temporal pattern: when the animal enters the field, spikes occur at the peak of the theta wave, and subsequent spikes occur at progressively earlier phases.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Knowing the phase in which a spike occurs can indicate where the animal is within the place field. This “phase precession” is an example of a “phase code”, in which the phase of the individual spike with respect to the ongoing theta may carry information beyond the firing rate.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>The observation that both rate and phase codes may carry information about the same parameter in the same neuron provides an opportunity for understanding how these codes are generated. A priori, there are at least three options (Figure 1): a rate code might be somehow converted into a phase code<span><sup>4</sup></span>; a phase code may be converted into a rate code<span><sup>5</sup></span>; or a third, “progenitor” code could generate both.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Work in the past three decades provided evidence for all three possibilities and for various combinations thereof, and numerous models were proposed for generating phase precession.<span><sup>7</sup></span></p><p>We combined electrophysiological recordings with optogenetic manipulations in freely-moving mice to approach the problem of the generation of rate and phase codes in CA1 pyramidal cells. We reasoned that imposing one code on the system may determine whether the codes are interdependent, and possibly constrain the generative mechanisms. Because multiple prior studies suggested that the phase precession observed in CA1 is inherited from other regions,<span><sup>7</sup></span> we chose to impose a rate code on individual pyramidal cells in CA1.</p><p>The induction of an artificial rate code presents several technical challenges. First, we developed hardware to manipulate the activity of individual neurons deep in the brain of freely-moving subjects.<span><sup>8</sup></span> We invented multi-site/multi-colour optoelectronic devices called “diode-probes” in which light from multiple miniature sources is emitted near the recording electrodes. Second, we coupled the activation of CA1 pyramidal cell spiking with the actual kinematics of the mouse. We developed a system called “Spotter","PeriodicalId":10189,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560855/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142615729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sabrina Setembre Batah, Andrea Jazel Rodriguez-Herrera, Maria Júlia Faci do Marco, Juliana Rocha Souza Chiappetto, Mariana Gatto, Simone Alves do Vale, Robson Aparecido Prudente, Amanda Piveta Schnepper, Robson Francisco Carvalho, João Paulo Facio Almeida, Tales Rubens de Nadai, Marcel Konigkam Santos, Li Siyuan Wada, José Baddini-Martinez, Danilo Tadao Wada, Andrea Antunes Cetlin, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Bruno Guedes Baldi, Suzana Tanni, Rosane Duarte Achcar, Alexandre Todorovic Fabro
<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>Our study has identified a gene expression profile associated with the progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to pulmonary fibrosis in a pro-fibrotic environment similar to that found in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (f-ILDs). Briefly, we noted the common expression of 86 genes in post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (post-CPF) and f-ILDs, indicating their likely involvement in perpetuating pulmonary fibrosis through shared fibrotic pathways—confirmed by the in-situ expression of MUC5ac and WNT10a. Furthermore, an additional set of 31 genes exhibited common expression patterns between subacute COVID-19, the so-called organizing diffuse alveolar damage (ODAD), and CPF, as well as f-ILDs. Among those genes, MUC4 and KRT5 were confirmed by immunohistochemistry, suggesting their role as potential predictors for the early outcome of possible pulmonary fibrosis.</p><p>Post-CPF is a long-term complication diagnosed by clinical setting, pulmonary function tests and/or image examinations.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Initially, some COVID-19-infected patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during the exudative phase of DAD, marked by cytokine storm and immune cell recruitment.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Following the inflammatory peak and pneumocyte injury, myofibroblast activation triggers extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, leading to ODAD-phase which typically restores to typical lung architecture. However, some patients progress to pulmonary fibrosis<span><sup>3</sup></span> with morphological changes that are driven by a complex pathophysiological sequence and dynamic gene expression shifts. In the end, the fibrotic outcome can resemble other f-ILDs. Identifying gene expression levels linked to the progression from ODAD to CPF is crucial for finding biomarkers for early diagnosis. Our study aimed to identify potential biomarkers in gene expression associated with fibrotic progression to CPF by analyzing the transcriptome of patients with ODAD, CPF, f-ILDs and controls.</p><p>As previously described by Batah et al.,<span><sup>4</sup></span> autopsies from the ODAD group revealed ODAD-phase with bronchiolar metaplasia, myxoid fibrosis, myofibroblastic activation and extensive alveolar septal thickening with collagen types I and III deposition (Table S1; Figure 1A–C). Meanwhile, after an average of 324.6 days following the initial positive nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), patients from the CPF group developed pulmonary fibrosis with bronchiolar metaplasia and parenchymal remodelling with increased collagen deposition, especially type I (suppinfo1; Figure 1D–F). Although the common remodelling profile, the differential gene expression (DGE) analysis between ODAD and CPF revealed distinct gene signatures (Figure S1A,B), Some of the top 20 DGEs reflect the manifestation of ARDS in ODAD patients (Figure S1C,D and Table S2). For example, the upregulatio
亲爱的编辑,我们的研究发现了与2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)进展为肺纤维化相关的基因表达谱,这种肺纤维化的促纤维化环境类似于纤维化间质性肺病(f-ILDs)。简而言之,我们注意到在 COVID-19 后肺纤维化(post-CPF)和 f-ILDs 中有 86 个基因的共同表达,这表明它们可能通过共同的纤维化途径参与了肺纤维化的延续--MUC5ac 和 WNT10a 的原位表达证实了这一点。此外,还有一组 31 个基因在亚急性 COVID-19、所谓的组织弥漫性肺泡损伤(ODAD)和 CPF 以及 f-ILD 之间表现出共同的表达模式。在这些基因中,MUC4 和 KRT5 通过免疫组化得到了证实,表明它们可能是肺纤维化早期结果的潜在预测因子。最初,一些 COVID-19 感染者会在 DAD 的渗出期出现急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),细胞因子风暴和免疫细胞募集是其特征。2 炎症高峰和肺细胞损伤之后,肌成纤维细胞活化引发细胞外基质(ECM)沉积,导致 ODAD 阶段,该阶段通常会恢复典型的肺结构。然而,有些患者会发展为肺纤维化3,其形态学变化是由复杂的病理生理顺序和动态基因表达变化驱动的。最终,纤维化的结果可能与其他 f-ILD 相似。确定与 ODAD 向 CPF 进展相关的基因表达水平,对于找到早期诊断的生物标志物至关重要。我们的研究旨在通过分析 ODAD、CPF、f-ILDs 患者和对照组的转录组,找出与纤维化进展至 CPF 相关的潜在基因表达生物标志物。正如 Batah 等人先前所描述的那样,4 ODAD 组的尸检结果显示,ODAD 期患者出现支气管化生、肌样纤维化、肌成纤维细胞活化和广泛的肺泡间隔增厚,并伴有 I 型和 III 型胶原沉积(表 S1;图 1A-C)。同时,在鼻咽拭子检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)初次阳性后平均 324.6 天,CPF 组患者出现肺纤维化,支气管化生和实质重塑,胶原沉积增加,尤其是 I 型胶原(suppinfo1;图 1D-F)。虽然ODAD和CPF的重塑特征相同,但其差异基因表达(DGE)分析却显示出不同的基因特征(图S1A,B),前20个DGE中的一些反映了ODAD患者ARDS的表现(图S1C,D和表S2)。例如,ODAD 中纤维蛋白溶解抑制因子 SERPINE1 的上调表明,沉积的纤维蛋白的积累是对 SARS-CoV-2 的更好的病理生理反应。5 然而,如前所述,两组均显示出肺实质重塑,WP 肺纤维化基因组(GSEA 系统名称 M39477)仅强调了两组之间的一些 DGE:与 CPF 相比,ODAD 中 MMP9 和 TERT 上调,MUC5B 和 FGF1 下调(图 S1E 和表 S3)。事实上,我们的数据显示,与 f-ILD 相比,各组间的基因表达具有显著的相似性,均表现为致密纤维化、结构扭曲、支气管化生、成纤维细胞灶以及 I 型和 III 型胶原沉积(表 S1 和图 1G-I)。CPF 与 f-ILD 的配对 DGE 分析(图 S2A,B)和 ODAD 与 f-ILD 的配对 DGE 分析(图 S3A,B)中的病例重叠可以看出这种相似性。在这两项主成分分析中,f-ILD 患者被分为两个不同的群组:在图 S2A 中,簇 A 与其他病例截然不同,而簇 B 则出现在 CPF 患者中。簇 A 显示出以支气管为中心的重塑模式,而簇 B 则显示出以肺间质均匀增厚为特征的非特异性病变模式,与 CPF 患者中观察到的病变模式相似。同样,在图 S3A 中,群组 D 的患者与群组 A 相同,也表现出以支气管为中心的 ECM 沉积;而群组 E 的病变模式更类似于 ODAD,也是非特异性的。这可能表明,每个群组的转录组特征会对 ECM 沉积的模式和强度产生不同的影响,从而导致不同形式的纤维化,具体取决于所表达的基因。 然而,我们研究的局限性在于它捕捉的是单个时间点的基因表达,因此需要进行纵向研究来追踪从急性感染阶段到纤维化发展阶段的基因表达变化。此外,鉴于这些生物标志物作为早期干预纤维化疾病的免疫组化标志物在临床实践中的巨大潜力,有必要在更大的群体中进一步验证这些生物标志物,并研究其潜在机制:Sabrina Setembre Batah 和 Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;形式分析:Sabrina Setembre Batah、Amanda Piveta Schnepper、Robson Francisco Carvalho 和 João Paulo Facio Almeida;资金获取:Sabrina Setembre Batah 和 Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;调查:Sabrina Setembre Batah、Juliana Rocha Souza Chiappetto、Tales Rubens de Nadai、Marcel Konigkam Santos、Li Siyuan Wada、Danilo Tadao Wada、Andrea Antunes Cetlin、Bruno Guedes Baldi 和 Suzana Tanni;方法:Sabrina Setembre Batah、Andrea Jazel Rodriguez-Herrera、Maria Júlia Faci do Marco、Juliana Rocha Souza Chiappetto、Mariana Gatto、Simone Alves do Vale、Robson Aparecido Prudente、Amanda Piveta Schnepper 和 João Paulo Facio Almeida;项目管理:Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;资源:Robson Francisco Carvalho、José Baddini-Martinez、Bruno Guedes Baldi、Suzana Tanni 和 Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;软件:Sabrina Setembre Batah、Amanda Piveta Schnepper、Robson Francisco Carvalho 和 João Paulo Facio Almeida;监督:Vera Luiza Capelozzi、Rosane Duarte Achcar 和 Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;验证:Sabrina Setembre Batah、Robson Francisco Carvalho 和 Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;可视化:José Baddini-Martinez, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Rosane Duarte Achcar 和 Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;写作-原稿:Sabrina Setembre Batah 和 Alexandre Todorovic Fabro;撰写-审阅;编辑:Sabrina Setembre Batah、Robson Francisco Carvalho、
{"title":"Transcriptomic profiling reveals the dynamics of fibrotic progression-related gene expression into post-coronavirus disease 2019 pulmonary fibrosis","authors":"Sabrina Setembre Batah, Andrea Jazel Rodriguez-Herrera, Maria Júlia Faci do Marco, Juliana Rocha Souza Chiappetto, Mariana Gatto, Simone Alves do Vale, Robson Aparecido Prudente, Amanda Piveta Schnepper, Robson Francisco Carvalho, João Paulo Facio Almeida, Tales Rubens de Nadai, Marcel Konigkam Santos, Li Siyuan Wada, José Baddini-Martinez, Danilo Tadao Wada, Andrea Antunes Cetlin, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Bruno Guedes Baldi, Suzana Tanni, Rosane Duarte Achcar, Alexandre Todorovic Fabro","doi":"10.1002/ctm2.70088","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ctm2.70088","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>Our study has identified a gene expression profile associated with the progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to pulmonary fibrosis in a pro-fibrotic environment similar to that found in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (f-ILDs). Briefly, we noted the common expression of 86 genes in post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (post-CPF) and f-ILDs, indicating their likely involvement in perpetuating pulmonary fibrosis through shared fibrotic pathways—confirmed by the in-situ expression of MUC5ac and WNT10a. Furthermore, an additional set of 31 genes exhibited common expression patterns between subacute COVID-19, the so-called organizing diffuse alveolar damage (ODAD), and CPF, as well as f-ILDs. Among those genes, MUC4 and KRT5 were confirmed by immunohistochemistry, suggesting their role as potential predictors for the early outcome of possible pulmonary fibrosis.</p><p>Post-CPF is a long-term complication diagnosed by clinical setting, pulmonary function tests and/or image examinations.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Initially, some COVID-19-infected patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during the exudative phase of DAD, marked by cytokine storm and immune cell recruitment.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Following the inflammatory peak and pneumocyte injury, myofibroblast activation triggers extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, leading to ODAD-phase which typically restores to typical lung architecture. However, some patients progress to pulmonary fibrosis<span><sup>3</sup></span> with morphological changes that are driven by a complex pathophysiological sequence and dynamic gene expression shifts. In the end, the fibrotic outcome can resemble other f-ILDs. Identifying gene expression levels linked to the progression from ODAD to CPF is crucial for finding biomarkers for early diagnosis. Our study aimed to identify potential biomarkers in gene expression associated with fibrotic progression to CPF by analyzing the transcriptome of patients with ODAD, CPF, f-ILDs and controls.</p><p>As previously described by Batah et al.,<span><sup>4</sup></span> autopsies from the ODAD group revealed ODAD-phase with bronchiolar metaplasia, myxoid fibrosis, myofibroblastic activation and extensive alveolar septal thickening with collagen types I and III deposition (Table S1; Figure 1A–C). Meanwhile, after an average of 324.6 days following the initial positive nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), patients from the CPF group developed pulmonary fibrosis with bronchiolar metaplasia and parenchymal remodelling with increased collagen deposition, especially type I (suppinfo1; Figure 1D–F). Although the common remodelling profile, the differential gene expression (DGE) analysis between ODAD and CPF revealed distinct gene signatures (Figure S1A,B), Some of the top 20 DGEs reflect the manifestation of ARDS in ODAD patients (Figure S1C,D and Table S2). For example, the upregulatio","PeriodicalId":10189,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560857/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142615734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}