首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Microbiology Reviews最新文献

英文 中文
Lyme borreliosis in Brazil: a critical review on the Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome (Brazilian Lyme-like disease). 巴西的莱姆包虫病:巴吉奥-约希纳里综合征(巴西莱姆样病)点评。
IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00097-24
Marcelo B Labruna, Álvaro A Faccini-Martínez, Sebastián Muñoz-Leal, Matias P J Szabó, Rodrigo N Angerami

SUMMARYLyme borreliosis or Lyme disease is the most frequently reported tick-borne disease in the Northern Hemisphere. In countries of the Southern Hemisphere, such as Brazil, since the early 1990s, some researchers have argued for the existence of an autochthonous Lyme-like borreliosis, known locally as the Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome (BYS), an alleged "Brazilian borreliosis" supposedly caused by a different strain of Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted by hard ticks. Currently, the existence of BYS in Brazil is still accepted by a large part of the human health care workers, scientists, medical societies, and patients. In fact, this alleged "Brazilian borreliosis" has been the tick-borne zoonotic disease with the greatest number of reported cases and published studies in Brazil during this century, second only to Brazilian spotted fever. In this manuscript, we reviewed all manuscripts directly related to BYS that have been published in Brazil during the last 35 years. This analysis included 199 individual human cases that have been reported in Brazil since 1989, plus multiple studies on ticks, domestic, and wild animals. Our revision aimed to provide a critical opinion on whether the current published works allow healthcare workers, public health agencies, and patients to accept the existence of Lyme disease, BYS, or other Lyme borreliosis-related disease in Brazil. For this purpose, we evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each published study, considering the diagnostic methods used, such as serological, microbiological, and molecular analyses. Based on these evaluations, we conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the occurrence of Lyme borreliosis in Brazil or that BYS (Brazilian Lyme-like disease) is caused by a bacterium of the genus Borrelia. This assumption is based on the inaccuracy, unreliability, and misinterpretation of the different diagnostic methods that have been used in Brazil. Recognizing the lack of technical evidence for the occurrence of Lyme borreliosis in Brazil has highly relevant implications. For example, it becomes imperative to raise awareness among the country's medical profession, as they have adopted unnecessary and extreme therapies recommended for patients with a supposed borrelial infection, including BYS, in Brazil. Finally, the technical analyses carried out in this study could be applied to other countries in the Southern Hemisphere (e.g., Argentina, South Africa, Australia), where cases classified and alleged as Lyme disease have been reported.

摘要莱姆包虫病或莱姆病是北半球报告最频繁的蜱媒疾病。在南半球国家,如巴西,自 20 世纪 90 年代初以来,一些研究人员一直在争论是否存在一种类似莱姆病的本地包虫病,当地人称之为 Baggio-Yoshinari 综合征(BYS),一种所谓的 "巴西包虫病",据说是由不同的包柔氏菌株引起的,由硬蜱传播。目前,大部分人类卫生保健工作者、科学家、医学会和病人仍然认可巴西存在巴氏综合征。事实上,这种所谓的 "巴西包虫病 "是本世纪巴西报告病例和发表研究最多的蜱媒人畜共患病,仅次于巴西斑疹热。在本手稿中,我们回顾了过去 35 年中在巴西发表的所有与巴西包虫病直接相关的手稿。该分析包括自 1989 年以来在巴西报告的 199 例人类病例,以及关于蜱、家畜和野生动物的多项研究。我们的修订旨在就目前发表的作品是否允许医疗工作者、公共卫生机构和患者接受莱姆病、BYS 或其他莱姆包虫病相关疾病在巴西的存在提出批评意见。为此,我们考虑到所使用的诊断方法,如血清学、微生物学和分子分析,评估了每项已发表研究的优缺点。根据这些评估,我们得出结论:没有足够的证据证明巴西存在莱姆-博雷利病,也没有足够的证据证明 BYS(巴西莱姆样病)是由博雷利属细菌引起的。这一假设的依据是巴西使用的不同诊断方法的不准确性、不可靠性和误读。认识到缺乏技术证据证明巴西存在莱姆-博雷利病,具有非常重要的意义。例如,当务之急是提高巴西医学界的认识,因为他们对巴西的假定包虫病感染者(包括 BYS)采用了不必要的极端疗法。最后,本研究中进行的技术分析可应用于南半球的其他国家(如阿根廷、南非、澳大利亚),这些国家也有被归类为莱姆病的病例报告。
{"title":"Lyme borreliosis in Brazil: a critical review on the Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome (Brazilian Lyme-like disease).","authors":"Marcelo B Labruna, Álvaro A Faccini-Martínez, Sebastián Muñoz-Leal, Matias P J Szabó, Rodrigo N Angerami","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00097-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00097-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYLyme borreliosis or Lyme disease is the most frequently reported tick-borne disease in the Northern Hemisphere. In countries of the Southern Hemisphere, such as Brazil, since the early 1990s, some researchers have argued for the existence of an autochthonous Lyme-like borreliosis, known locally as the Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome (BYS), an alleged \"Brazilian borreliosis\" supposedly caused by a different strain of <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> and transmitted by hard ticks. Currently, the existence of BYS in Brazil is still accepted by a large part of the human health care workers, scientists, medical societies, and patients. In fact, this alleged \"Brazilian borreliosis\" has been the tick-borne zoonotic disease with the greatest number of reported cases and published studies in Brazil during this century, second only to Brazilian spotted fever. In this manuscript, we reviewed all manuscripts directly related to BYS that have been published in Brazil during the last 35 years. This analysis included 199 individual human cases that have been reported in Brazil since 1989, plus multiple studies on ticks, domestic, and wild animals. Our revision aimed to provide a critical opinion on whether the current published works allow healthcare workers, public health agencies, and patients to accept the existence of Lyme disease, BYS, or other Lyme borreliosis-related disease in Brazil. For this purpose, we evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each published study, considering the diagnostic methods used, such as serological, microbiological, and molecular analyses. Based on these evaluations, we conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the occurrence of Lyme borreliosis in Brazil or that BYS (Brazilian Lyme-like disease) is caused by a bacterium of the genus <i>Borrelia</i>. This assumption is based on the inaccuracy, unreliability, and misinterpretation of the different diagnostic methods that have been used in Brazil. Recognizing the lack of technical evidence for the occurrence of Lyme borreliosis in Brazil has highly relevant implications. For example, it becomes imperative to raise awareness among the country's medical profession, as they have adopted unnecessary and extreme therapies recommended for patients with a supposed borrelial infection, including BYS, in Brazil. Finally, the technical analyses carried out in this study could be applied to other countries in the Southern Hemisphere (<i>e.g.</i>, Argentina, South Africa, Australia), where cases classified and alleged as Lyme disease have been reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0009724"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629638/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antibiotic tolerance among clinical isolates: mechanisms, detection, prevalence, and significance. 临床分离株的抗生素耐受性:机制、检测、流行率和意义。
IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00106-24
Ashley T Deventer, Claire E Stevens, Amy Stewart, Joanne K Hobbs

SUMMARYAntibiotic treatment failures in the absence of resistance are not uncommon. Recently, attention has grown around the phenomenon of antibiotic tolerance, an underappreciated contributor to recalcitrant infections first detected in the 1970s. Tolerance describes the ability of a bacterial population to survive transient exposure to an otherwise lethal concentration of antibiotic without exhibiting resistance. With advances in genomics, we are gaining a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind tolerance, and several studies have sought to examine the clinical prevalence of tolerance. Attempts have also been made to assess the clinical significance of tolerance through in vivo infection models and prospective/retrospective clinical studies. Here, we review the data available on the molecular mechanisms, detection, prevalence, and clinical significance of genotypic tolerance that span ~50 years. We discuss the need for standardized methodology and interpretation criteria for tolerance detection and the impact that methodological inconsistencies have on our ability to accurately assess the scale of the problem. In terms of the clinical significance of tolerance, studies suggest that tolerance contributes to worse outcomes for patients (e.g., higher mortality, prolonged hospitalization), but historical data from animal models are varied. Furthermore, we lack the necessary information to effectively treat tolerant infections. Overall, while the tolerance field is gaining much-needed traction, the underlying clinical significance of tolerance that underpins all tolerance research is still far from clear and requires attention.

摘要 在没有抗药性的情况下,抗生素治疗失败的情况并不少见。最近,人们开始关注抗生素耐受性现象,这是 20 世纪 70 年代首次发现的导致顽固性感染的一个未被重视的因素。耐受性是指细菌种群在短暂接触致命浓度的抗生素后能够存活下来而不表现出抗药性的能力。随着基因组学的进步,我们对耐药性背后的分子机制有了更深入的了解,有几项研究试图检查耐药性的临床流行情况。此外,还尝试通过体内感染模型和前瞻性/回顾性临床研究来评估耐药性的临床意义。在此,我们回顾了有关基因型耐受性的分子机制、检测、流行率和临床意义的现有数据,这些数据的时间跨度约为 50 年。我们讨论了耐受性检测标准化方法和解释标准的必要性,以及方法不一致对我们准确评估问题规模的影响。就耐受性的临床意义而言,研究表明耐受性会导致患者病情恶化(如死亡率升高、住院时间延长),但来自动物模型的历史数据却不尽相同。此外,我们还缺乏有效治疗耐受性感染的必要信息。总之,虽然耐受性领域正在获得亟需的牵引力,但作为所有耐受性研究基础的耐受性的基本临床意义仍远未明确,需要引起重视。
{"title":"Antibiotic tolerance among clinical isolates: mechanisms, detection, prevalence, and significance.","authors":"Ashley T Deventer, Claire E Stevens, Amy Stewart, Joanne K Hobbs","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00106-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00106-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYAntibiotic treatment failures in the absence of resistance are not uncommon. Recently, attention has grown around the phenomenon of antibiotic tolerance, an underappreciated contributor to recalcitrant infections first detected in the 1970s. Tolerance describes the ability of a bacterial population to survive transient exposure to an otherwise lethal concentration of antibiotic without exhibiting resistance. With advances in genomics, we are gaining a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind tolerance, and several studies have sought to examine the clinical prevalence of tolerance. Attempts have also been made to assess the clinical significance of tolerance through <i>in vivo</i> infection models and prospective/retrospective clinical studies. Here, we review the data available on the molecular mechanisms, detection, prevalence, and clinical significance of genotypic tolerance that span ~50 years. We discuss the need for standardized methodology and interpretation criteria for tolerance detection and the impact that methodological inconsistencies have on our ability to accurately assess the scale of the problem. In terms of the clinical significance of tolerance, studies suggest that tolerance contributes to worse outcomes for patients (e.g., higher mortality, prolonged hospitalization), but historical data from animal models are varied. Furthermore, we lack the necessary information to effectively treat tolerant infections. Overall, while the tolerance field is gaining much-needed traction, the underlying clinical significance of tolerance that underpins all tolerance research is still far from clear and requires attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0010624"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629620/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recent advances in the influenza virus vaccine landscape: a comprehensive overview of technologies and trials. 流感病毒疫苗领域的最新进展:技术与试验综述。
IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00025-24
Tristan W Clark, John S Tregoning, Helen Lister, Tiziano Poletti, Femy Amin, Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam

SUMMARYIn the United Kingdom (UK) in 2022/23, influenza virus infections returned to the levels recorded before the COVID-19 pandemic, exerting a substantial burden on an already stretched National Health Service (NHS) through increased primary and emergency care visits and subsequent hospitalizations. Population groups ≤4 years and ≥65 years of age, and those with underlying health conditions, are at the greatest risk of influenza-related hospitalization. Recent advances in influenza virus vaccine technologies may help to mitigate this burden. This review aims to summarize advances in the influenza virus vaccine landscape by describing the different technologies that are currently in use in the UK and more widely. The review also describes vaccine technologies that are under development, including mRNA, and universal influenza virus vaccines which aim to provide broader or increased protection. This is an exciting and important era for influenza virus vaccinations, and advances are critical to protect against a disease that still exerts a substantial burden across all populations and disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable, despite it being over 80 years since the first influenza virus vaccines were deployed.

摘要在 2022/23 年度,英国的流感病毒感染率恢复到了 COVID-19 大流行之前的水平,这给本已捉襟见肘的国民医疗服务系统(NHS)带来了沉重负担,因为初诊和急诊就诊人数以及随后的住院人数都有所增加。年龄≤4岁和≥65岁的人群以及有潜在健康问题的人群因流感住院的风险最大。流感病毒疫苗技术的最新进展可能有助于减轻这一负担。本综述旨在通过描述目前在英国和更广泛地区使用的不同技术,总结流感病毒疫苗领域的进展。综述还介绍了正在开发的疫苗技术,包括旨在提供更广泛或更强保护的 mRNA 和通用流感病毒疫苗。对于流感病毒疫苗接种来说,这是一个令人兴奋的重要时代,尽管自首次使用流感病毒疫苗以来已经过去了 80 多年,但这种疾病仍然给所有人群带来沉重负担,对最脆弱人群的影响尤为严重。
{"title":"Recent advances in the influenza virus vaccine landscape: a comprehensive overview of technologies and trials.","authors":"Tristan W Clark, John S Tregoning, Helen Lister, Tiziano Poletti, Femy Amin, Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00025-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00025-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYIn the United Kingdom (UK) in 2022/23, influenza virus infections returned to the levels recorded before the COVID-19 pandemic, exerting a substantial burden on an already stretched National Health Service (NHS) through increased primary and emergency care visits and subsequent hospitalizations. Population groups ≤4 years and ≥65 years of age, and those with underlying health conditions, are at the greatest risk of influenza-related hospitalization. Recent advances in influenza virus vaccine technologies may help to mitigate this burden. This review aims to summarize advances in the influenza virus vaccine landscape by describing the different technologies that are currently in use in the UK and more widely. The review also describes vaccine technologies that are under development, including mRNA, and universal influenza virus vaccines which aim to provide broader or increased protection. This is an exciting and important era for influenza virus vaccinations, and advances are critical to protect against a disease that still exerts a substantial burden across all populations and disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable, despite it being over 80 years since the first influenza virus vaccines were deployed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0002524"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2024 Acknowledgment of CMR Reviewers. 2024 CMR审稿人致谢。
IF 19 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00207-24
Graeme Forrest
{"title":"2024 Acknowledgment of CMR Reviewers.","authors":"Graeme Forrest","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00207-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00207-24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":"37 4","pages":"e0020724"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629611/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The emerging challenge of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: time for innovative treatment approaches. 经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新出现的粪肠球菌心内膜炎挑战:创新治疗方法的时机已到。
IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00168-23
Jaclyn A Cusumano, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos, Mathieu Le Provost, Nicolas R Gallo, Steven M Levine, Thomas Inzana, Aikaterini Papamanoli

SUMMARYInfective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection that has nearly doubled in prevalence over the last two decades due to the increase in implantable cardiac devices. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently one of the most common cardiac procedures. TAVI usage continues to exponentially rise, inevitability increasing TAVI-IE. Patients with TAVI are frequently nonsurgical candidates, and TAVI-IE 1-year mortality rates can be as high as 74% without valve or bacterial biofilm removal. Enterococcus faecalis, a historically less common IE pathogen, is the primary cause of TAVI-IE. Treatment options are limited due to enterococcal intrinsic resistance and biofilm formation. Novel approaches are warranted to tackle current therapeutic gaps. We describe the existing challenges in treating TAVI-IE and how available treatment discovery approaches can be combined with an in silico "Living Heart" model to create solutions for the future.

摘要感染性心内膜炎(IE)是一种威胁生命的感染,由于植入式心脏设备的增加,其发病率在过去二十年中几乎翻了一番。经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是目前最常见的心脏手术之一。经导管主动脉瓣植入术的使用率继续呈指数增长,不可避免地增加了经导管主动脉瓣植入术的创伤。TAVI 患者通常都是非手术候选者,如果不清除瓣膜或细菌生物膜,TAVI-IE 1 年死亡率可高达 74%。粪肠球菌是一种历史上较少见的 IE 病原,是导致 TAVI-IE 的主要原因。由于肠球菌的内在耐药性和生物膜的形成,治疗方案十分有限。需要采用新方法来解决目前的治疗空白。我们介绍了治疗 TAVI-IE 的现有挑战,以及如何将现有的治疗发现方法与硅学 "活体心脏 "模型相结合,为未来创造解决方案。
{"title":"The emerging challenge of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: time for innovative treatment approaches.","authors":"Jaclyn A Cusumano, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos, Mathieu Le Provost, Nicolas R Gallo, Steven M Levine, Thomas Inzana, Aikaterini Papamanoli","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00168-23","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00168-23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYInfective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection that has nearly doubled in prevalence over the last two decades due to the increase in implantable cardiac devices. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently one of the most common cardiac procedures. TAVI usage continues to exponentially rise, inevitability increasing TAVI-IE. Patients with TAVI are frequently nonsurgical candidates, and TAVI-IE 1-year mortality rates can be as high as 74% without valve or bacterial biofilm removal. <i>Enterococcus faecalis,</i> a historically less common IE pathogen, is the primary cause of TAVI-IE. Treatment options are limited due to enterococcal intrinsic resistance and biofilm formation. Novel approaches are warranted to tackle current therapeutic gaps. We describe the existing challenges in treating TAVI-IE and how available treatment discovery approaches can be combined with an <i>in silico</i> \"Living Heart\" model to create solutions for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0016823"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629618/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The challenges of difficult-to-treat Acinetobacter infections. 难治性醋酸杆菌感染的挑战。
IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00093-24
Guy A Richards, Olga Perovic, Adrian J Brink

SUMMARYInfections due to Acinetobacter spp. are among the most difficult to treat. Most are resistant to standard antibiotics, and there is difficulty in distinguishing colonizers from pathogens. This mini-review examines the available antibiotics that exhibit activity against these organisms and provides guidance as to which cultures are relevant and how to treat active infections. Antibiograms describing resistance mechanisms and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) are essential to determine which agent or combination of agents should be used after confirmation of infection, utilizing clinical parameters and biomarkers such as procalcitonin. Directed therapy should be prompt as despite its reputation as a colonizer, the attributable mortality is high. However, although combination therapy is advised, no specific combination has definite evidence of superiority.

摘要由不动杆菌属引起的感染是最难治疗的疾病之一。它们大多对标准抗生素具有耐药性,而且很难区分定植菌和病原体。这篇小型综述探讨了对这些病菌具有活性的现有抗生素,并就哪些培养物具有相关性以及如何治疗活动性感染提供了指导。描述耐药机制和最低抑菌浓度 (MIC) 的抗生素图谱对于在确认感染后利用临床参数和降钙素原等生物标志物确定应使用哪种药物或药物组合至关重要。应及时进行指导性治疗,因为尽管它被称为 "定植剂",但其致死率却很高。不过,虽然建议采用联合疗法,但没有任何特定的联合疗法有明确的优越性证据。
{"title":"The challenges of difficult-to-treat <i>Acinetobacter</i> infections.","authors":"Guy A Richards, Olga Perovic, Adrian J Brink","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00093-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00093-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYInfections due to <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. are among the most difficult to treat. Most are resistant to standard antibiotics, and there is difficulty in distinguishing colonizers from pathogens. This mini-review examines the available antibiotics that exhibit activity against these organisms and provides guidance as to which cultures are relevant and how to treat active infections. Antibiograms describing resistance mechanisms and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) are essential to determine which agent or combination of agents should be used after confirmation of infection, utilizing clinical parameters and biomarkers such as procalcitonin. Directed therapy should be prompt as despite its reputation as a colonizer, the attributable mortality is high. However, although combination therapy is advised, no specific combination has definite evidence of superiority.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0009324"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629631/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142646599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toward better cures for Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease. 为更好地治愈脓肿分枝杆菌肺病而努力。
IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00080-23
Véronique Dartois, Thomas Dick

SUMMARYThe opportunistic pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) causes fatal lung infections that bear similarities-and notable differences-with tuberculosis (TB) pulmonary disease. In contrast to TB, no antibiotic is formally approved to treat Mab disease, there is no reliable cure, and the discovery and development pipeline is incredibly thin. Here, we discuss the factors behind the unsatisfactory cure rates of Mab disease, namely intrinsic resistance and persistence of the pathogen, and the use of underperforming, often parenteral and toxic, repurposed drugs. We propose preclinical strategies to build injectable-free sterilizing and safe regimens: (i) prioritize oral bactericidal antibiotic classes, with an initial focus on approved agents or advanced clinical candidates to provide immediate options for desperate patients, (ii) test drug combinations early, (iii) optimize novel leads specifically for M. abscessus, and (iv) consider pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets at the site of disease, the lung lesions in which drug tolerant bacterial populations reside. Knowledge and tool gaps in the preclinical drug discovery process are identified, including validated mouse models and computational platforms to enable in vitro mouse-human translation. We briefly discuss recent advances in clinical development, the need for readouts and biomarkers that correlate with cure, and clinical trial concepts adapted to the uniqueness of Mab patient populations for new regimen development. In an era when most pharmaceutical firms have withdrawn from antimicrobial drug discovery, the breakthroughs needed to fill the regimen development pipeline will likely come from partnerships between academia, biotech, pharma, non-profit organizations, and governments, with incentives that reward cooperation.

摘要机会性病原体脓肿分枝杆菌(Mab)会导致致命的肺部感染,与肺结核(TB)有相似之处,也有明显的不同之处。与肺结核不同的是,没有一种抗生素被正式批准用于治疗脓肿分枝杆菌病,也没有可靠的治愈方法,而且发现和开发的渠道非常稀少。在此,我们讨论了马布病治愈率不尽人意背后的因素,即病原体的内在抗药性和持久性,以及使用性能不佳、通常是肠外和有毒的再用途药物。我们提出了建立免注射灭菌安全方案的临床前策略:(i) 优先考虑口服杀菌抗生素类别,最初重点关注已获批准的药物或先进的临床候选药物,以便为绝望的患者提供直接选择;(ii) 尽早测试药物组合;(iii) 优化专门针对脓毒症马勃菌的新型先导药物;(iv) 考虑发病部位的药代动力学-药效学目标,即耐药细菌群栖息的肺部病变部位。我们确定了临床前药物发现过程中的知识和工具缺口,包括验证小鼠模型和计算平台,以实现体外小鼠-人体转化。我们简要讨论了临床开发的最新进展、对与治愈相关的读数和生物标志物的需求,以及适应马布病患者群体独特性的临床试验概念,以开发新的治疗方案。在大多数制药公司已退出抗菌药物研发的时代,填补新药研发管道所需的突破很可能来自学术界、生物技术公司、制药公司、非营利组织和政府之间的合作,以及奖励合作的激励机制。
{"title":"Toward better cures for <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> lung disease.","authors":"Véronique Dartois, Thomas Dick","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00080-23","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00080-23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYThe opportunistic pathogen <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (Mab) causes fatal lung infections that bear similarities-and notable differences-with tuberculosis (TB) pulmonary disease. In contrast to TB, no antibiotic is formally approved to treat Mab disease, there is no reliable cure, and the discovery and development pipeline is incredibly thin. Here, we discuss the factors behind the unsatisfactory cure rates of Mab disease, namely intrinsic resistance and persistence of the pathogen, and the use of underperforming, often parenteral and toxic, repurposed drugs. We propose preclinical strategies to build injectable-free sterilizing and safe regimens: (i) prioritize oral bactericidal antibiotic classes, with an initial focus on approved agents or advanced clinical candidates to provide immediate options for desperate patients, (ii) test drug combinations early, (iii) optimize novel leads specifically for <i>M. abscessus</i>, and (iv) consider pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets at the site of disease, the lung lesions in which drug tolerant bacterial populations reside. Knowledge and tool gaps in the preclinical drug discovery process are identified, including validated mouse models and computational platforms to enable <i>in vitro</i> mouse-human translation. We briefly discuss recent advances in clinical development, the need for readouts and biomarkers that correlate with cure, and clinical trial concepts adapted to the uniqueness of Mab patient populations for new regimen development. In an era when most pharmaceutical firms have withdrawn from antimicrobial drug discovery, the breakthroughs needed to fill the regimen development pipeline will likely come from partnerships between academia, biotech, pharma, non-profit organizations, and governments, with incentives that reward cooperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0008023"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629636/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
American Society for Microbiology evidence-based laboratory medicine practice guidelines to reduce blood culture contamination rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 美国微生物学会降低血液培养污染率的循证实验室医学实践指南:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 19 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00087-24
Robert L Sautter, James Scott Parrott, Irving Nachamkin, Christen Diel, Ryan J Tom, April M Bobenchik, Judith Young Bradford, Peter Gilligan, Diane C Halstead, P Rocco LaSala, A Brian Mochon, Joel E Mortensen, Lindsay Boyce, Vickie Baselski
<p><p>SUMMARYBlood cultures (BCs) are one of the critical tests used to detect bloodstream infections. BC results are not 100% specific. Interpretation of BC results is often complicated by detecting microbial contamination rather than true infection. False positives due to blood culture contamination (BCC) vary from 1% to as high as >10% of all BC results. False-positive BC results may result in patients undergoing unnecessary antimicrobial treatments, increased healthcare costs, and delay in detecting the true cause of infection or other non-infectious illness. Previous guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, College of American Pathologists, and others, based on expert opinion and surveys, promoted a limit of ≤3% as acceptable for BCC rates. However, the data supporting such recommendations are controversial. A previous systematic review of BCC examined three practices for reducing BCC rates (venipuncture, phlebotomy teams, and pre-packaged kits). Subsequently, numerous studies on different practices including using diversion devices, disinfectants, and education/training to lower BCC have been published. The goal of the current guideline is to identify beneficial intervention strategies to reduce BCC rates, including devices, practices, and education/training by providers in collaboration with the laboratory. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2017 and 2022 using numerous databases. Of the 11,319 unique records identified, 311 articles were sought for full-text review, of which 177 were reviewed; 126 of the full-text articles were excluded based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from a total of 49 articles included in the final analysis. An evidenced-based committee's expert panel reviewed all the references as mentioned in Data Collection and determined if the articles met the inclusion criteria. Data from extractions were captured within an extraction template in the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Systematic Review Data Repository (https://srdr.ahrq.gov/). BCC rates were captured as the number of events (contaminated samples) per arm (standard practice versus improvement practice). Modified versions of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools were used for risk of bias assessment (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools). We used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations to assess strength of evidence. There are several interventions that resulted in significant reduction in BCC rates: chlorhexidine as a disinfectant for skin preparation, using a diversion device prior to drawing BCs, using sterile technique practices, using a phlebotomy team to obtain BCs, and education/training programs. While there were no substantial differences between methods of decreasing BCC, our results indicate that the method of implementation can determine the success or
摘要血液培养(BC)是用于检测血流感染的关键检测方法之一。血液培养结果并非 100%特异。由于检测到的是微生物污染而非真正的感染,BC 结果的解释往往会变得复杂。在所有 BC 结果中,因血液培养污染 (BCC) 而导致的假阳性率从 1% 到 >10% 不等。假阳性 BC 结果可能导致患者接受不必要的抗菌治疗,增加医疗成本,并延误感染或其他非感染性疾病真正病因的检测。临床与实验室标准研究所、美国病理学家学会等机构以前根据专家意见和调查制定的指南提倡将 BCC 率限制在≤3%,认为这是可以接受的。然而,支持这些建议的数据却存在争议。先前的 BCC 系统性回顾研究了降低 BCC 发生率的三种方法(静脉穿刺、抽血小组和预包装试剂盒)。随后,又发表了大量关于不同实践的研究,包括使用分流装置、消毒剂和教育/培训来降低 BCC。本指南的目标是确定有益的干预策略以降低 BCC 发生率,包括设备、实践以及由医疗服务提供者与实验室合作开展的教育/培训。我们利用众多数据库对 2017 年至 2022 年间的文献进行了系统性回顾。在确定的 11,319 条唯一记录中,我们对 311 篇文章进行了全文审阅,并审阅了其中的 177 篇;根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准,我们排除了其中的 126 篇全文文章。共从 49 篇文章中提取了数据,纳入最终分析。循证委员会的专家小组审查了数据收集中提到的所有参考文献,并确定文章是否符合纳入标准。提取的数据被纳入美国医疗保健研究与质量局系统综述数据存储库(https://srdr.ahrq.gov/)的提取模板中。BCC率以每组(标准实践与改进实践)的事件数(污染样本)来表示。国家心肺血液研究所研究质量评估工具的修订版用于偏倚风险评估(https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools)。我们使用 "建议、评估、发展和评价分级 "来评估证据的强度。有几种干预措施可显著降低 BCC 发生率:将洗必泰作为备皮消毒剂、在抽取 BCs 前使用分流装置、使用无菌技术操作、使用抽血小组获取 BCs 以及教育/培训计划。虽然减少 BCC 的方法之间没有实质性差异,但我们的结果表明,实施方法可以决定干预的成败。我们的循证系统综述和荟萃分析支持几种有效减少 BCC 约 40%-60% 的干预措施。但是,如果没有教育/培训部分和主要利益相关者的支持来实施各种干预措施,仅靠设备是无法有效降低 BCC 发生率的。
{"title":"American Society for Microbiology evidence-based laboratory medicine practice guidelines to reduce blood culture contamination rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Robert L Sautter, James Scott Parrott, Irving Nachamkin, Christen Diel, Ryan J Tom, April M Bobenchik, Judith Young Bradford, Peter Gilligan, Diane C Halstead, P Rocco LaSala, A Brian Mochon, Joel E Mortensen, Lindsay Boyce, Vickie Baselski","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00087-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/cmr.00087-24","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SUMMARYBlood cultures (BCs) are one of the critical tests used to detect bloodstream infections. BC results are not 100% specific. Interpretation of BC results is often complicated by detecting microbial contamination rather than true infection. False positives due to blood culture contamination (BCC) vary from 1% to as high as &gt;10% of all BC results. False-positive BC results may result in patients undergoing unnecessary antimicrobial treatments, increased healthcare costs, and delay in detecting the true cause of infection or other non-infectious illness. Previous guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, College of American Pathologists, and others, based on expert opinion and surveys, promoted a limit of ≤3% as acceptable for BCC rates. However, the data supporting such recommendations are controversial. A previous systematic review of BCC examined three practices for reducing BCC rates (venipuncture, phlebotomy teams, and pre-packaged kits). Subsequently, numerous studies on different practices including using diversion devices, disinfectants, and education/training to lower BCC have been published. The goal of the current guideline is to identify beneficial intervention strategies to reduce BCC rates, including devices, practices, and education/training by providers in collaboration with the laboratory. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2017 and 2022 using numerous databases. Of the 11,319 unique records identified, 311 articles were sought for full-text review, of which 177 were reviewed; 126 of the full-text articles were excluded based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from a total of 49 articles included in the final analysis. An evidenced-based committee's expert panel reviewed all the references as mentioned in Data Collection and determined if the articles met the inclusion criteria. Data from extractions were captured within an extraction template in the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Systematic Review Data Repository (https://srdr.ahrq.gov/). BCC rates were captured as the number of events (contaminated samples) per arm (standard practice versus improvement practice). Modified versions of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools were used for risk of bias assessment (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools). We used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations to assess strength of evidence. There are several interventions that resulted in significant reduction in BCC rates: chlorhexidine as a disinfectant for skin preparation, using a diversion device prior to drawing BCs, using sterile technique practices, using a phlebotomy team to obtain BCs, and education/training programs. While there were no substantial differences between methods of decreasing BCC, our results indicate that the method of implementation can determine the success or ","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0008724"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rapid and accurate testing for urinary tract infection: new clothes for the emperor 快速准确的尿路感染检测:皇帝的新衣
IF 36.8 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00129-24
Robert B. MorelandLinda BrubakerLana TinawiAlan J. Wolfe1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA2Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USAGraeme N. ForrestRajvinder KhasriyaNazema Siddiqui
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Ahead of Print.
临床微生物学评论,提前印刷。
{"title":"Rapid and accurate testing for urinary tract infection: new clothes for the emperor","authors":"Robert B. MorelandLinda BrubakerLana TinawiAlan J. Wolfe1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA2Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USAGraeme N. ForrestRajvinder KhasriyaNazema Siddiqui","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00129-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00129-24","url":null,"abstract":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142782729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enriching the future of public health microbiology with hybridization bait capture 利用杂交诱饵捕获技术丰富公共卫生微生物学的未来
IF 36.8 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00068-22
Megan S. BeaudryMohammad Imtiaj Uddin BhuiyanTravis C. Glenn1Department of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA2Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA3Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USAGraeme N. Forrest
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Ahead of Print.
临床微生物学评论》,提前出版。
{"title":"Enriching the future of public health microbiology with hybridization bait capture","authors":"Megan S. BeaudryMohammad Imtiaj Uddin BhuiyanTravis C. Glenn1Department of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA2Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA3Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USAGraeme N. Forrest","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00068-22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00068-22","url":null,"abstract":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142637589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1