首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®最新文献

英文 中文
Art in Science: Focusing on Dystonia. 科学中的艺术聚焦肌张力障碍。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003188
Stuart A Green, Nina Scolnik
{"title":"Art in Science: Focusing on Dystonia.","authors":"Stuart A Green, Nina Scolnik","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003188","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003188","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419457/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Forgotten Joint Score Is a Valid Outcome Measure for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study. 被遗忘的关节评分是衡量全踝关节置换术效果的有效方法:前瞻性研究
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-26 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003083
Antonio Mazzotti, Simone Ottavio Zielli, Elena Artioli, Michele Astolfi, Laura Langone, Cesare Faldini

Background: The success of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) involves objective and subjective parameters such as joint motion and implant survival. Patient-reported outcome measures provide key context from the patient's perspective so that we can evaluate the results of these procedures. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has demonstrated validity and reliability in other arthroplasties, but the existing evidence on the FJS in TAA is very limited.

Question/purposes: We aimed to assess the reliability, validity, responsiveness to change, and floor and ceiling effects, as well as to perform a gender analysis, of the FJS in patients who had undergone TAA.

Methods: A prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent TAA at our institution between June 2021 and May 2023. The three-component TAA was performed through an anterior approach. A total of 120 patients (mean age 62 ± 10 years) participated, which was 83% (120 of 145) of those eligible, and 77% (92 of 120) of those patients underwent follow-up assessments at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. A cross-culturally adapted and validated version of the FJS in our language (Italian) was used. Additionally, three other commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for TAA were administered: the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and the VAS.

Results: Reliability was demonstrated by excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.95) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99; standard error of measurement = 2.7). Robust validity was observed, in that the FJS had a strong correlation with the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, the MOXFQ, and the VAS (Pearson and Spearman values consistently above 0.7 or below -0.7). Responsiveness to change was observed between 6 and 12 months (Cohen d = 0.37). Low ceiling and floor effects at both 6 months (4% and 3% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) and 12 months (10% and 0% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) were demonstrated, below the recommended 15% interpretability threshold. No association between outcomes and patient gender was observed.

Conclusion: Test properties and validity of the FJS were strong in patients who underwent TAA. It seems suitable for clinical use, although future studies should seek to replicate or refute our findings in other patient populations.

Level of evidence: Level II, therapeutic study.

背景:全踝关节置换术(TAA)的成功与否涉及关节活动度和植入物存活率等主客观参数。患者报告的结果指标从患者的角度提供了关键的背景信息,以便我们评估这些手术的结果。被遗忘关节评分(FJS)已在其他关节置换术中证明了有效性和可靠性,但在 TAA 中使用 FJS 的现有证据非常有限:我们的目的是评估 FJS 在 TAA 患者中的可靠性、有效性、对变化的反应性、下限和上限效应,并进行性别分析:一项前瞻性观察研究招募了2021年6月至2023年5月期间在我院接受TAA手术的患者。三部分 TAA 均通过前路进行。共有120名患者(平均年龄62±10岁)参与了研究,占符合条件者的83%(145人中的120人),其中77%的患者(120人中的92人)在术后12±1个月接受了随访评估。该研究使用了经过跨文化改编和验证的意大利语版本的 FJS。此外,还采用了其他三种常用的患者报告 TAA 结果的方法:美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分、曼彻斯特-牛津足部问卷(MOXFQ)和 VAS:结果:曼彻斯特-牛津足部问卷(MOXFQ)和VAS的可靠性表现为极好的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数=0.95)和极好的测试-再测试可靠性(类内相关系数=0.99;测量标准误差=2.7)。FJS 与 AOFAS 踝关节-后足评分、MOXFQ 和 VAS 有很强的相关性(皮尔逊值和斯皮尔曼值始终高于 0.7 或低于-0.7),因此具有很强的有效性。在 6 个月和 12 个月期间,观察到了对变化的反应性(Cohen d = 0.37)。6 个月(分别有 4% 和 3% 达到最高分和最低分)和 12 个月(分别有 10% 和 0% 达到最高分和最低分)的上限和下限效应较低,低于建议的 15% 可解释性阈值。结果与患者性别之间没有关联:结论:在接受 TAA 的患者中,FJS 具有很强的测试特性和有效性。尽管未来的研究应寻求在其他患者群体中复制或反驳我们的发现,但它似乎适合临床使用:二级,治疗性研究。
{"title":"The Forgotten Joint Score Is a Valid Outcome Measure for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Antonio Mazzotti, Simone Ottavio Zielli, Elena Artioli, Michele Astolfi, Laura Langone, Cesare Faldini","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003083","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The success of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) involves objective and subjective parameters such as joint motion and implant survival. Patient-reported outcome measures provide key context from the patient's perspective so that we can evaluate the results of these procedures. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has demonstrated validity and reliability in other arthroplasties, but the existing evidence on the FJS in TAA is very limited.</p><p><strong>Question/purposes: </strong>We aimed to assess the reliability, validity, responsiveness to change, and floor and ceiling effects, as well as to perform a gender analysis, of the FJS in patients who had undergone TAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent TAA at our institution between June 2021 and May 2023. The three-component TAA was performed through an anterior approach. A total of 120 patients (mean age 62 ± 10 years) participated, which was 83% (120 of 145) of those eligible, and 77% (92 of 120) of those patients underwent follow-up assessments at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. A cross-culturally adapted and validated version of the FJS in our language (Italian) was used. Additionally, three other commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for TAA were administered: the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and the VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability was demonstrated by excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.95) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99; standard error of measurement = 2.7). Robust validity was observed, in that the FJS had a strong correlation with the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, the MOXFQ, and the VAS (Pearson and Spearman values consistently above 0.7 or below -0.7). Responsiveness to change was observed between 6 and 12 months (Cohen d = 0.37). Low ceiling and floor effects at both 6 months (4% and 3% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) and 12 months (10% and 0% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) were demonstrated, below the recommended 15% interpretability threshold. No association between outcomes and patient gender was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Test properties and validity of the FJS were strong in patients who underwent TAA. It seems suitable for clinical use, although future studies should seek to replicate or refute our findings in other patient populations.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419501/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140851605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases? 致编辑的信:在治疗骨转移灶引起的后续骨骼相关事件时,当前的生存预测工具是否有用?
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003174
Junqing Miao, Haorui Li, Jingzhi Wang
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?","authors":"Junqing Miao, Haorui Li, Jingzhi Wang","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003174","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003174","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CORR Insights®: What Is the Long-term Wear of a 5-Mrad Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liner? A 14-year RSA Study. CORR Insights®:5-Mrad 高交联聚乙烯衬里的长期磨损情况如何?一项为期 14 年的 RSA 研究。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-23 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003086
Matthew G Teeter
{"title":"CORR Insights®: What Is the Long-term Wear of a 5-Mrad Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liner? A 14-year RSA Study.","authors":"Matthew G Teeter","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003086","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003086","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419494/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140851734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases? 回复致编辑的信:在治疗骨转移灶引起的后续骨骼相关事件时,当前的生存预测工具是否有用?
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003191
Yu-Ting Pan, Yen-Po Lin, Hung-Kuan Yen, Hung-Ho Yen, Chi-Ching Huang, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Wei-Hsin Lin, Hsiang-Chieh Hsieh
{"title":"Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?","authors":"Yu-Ting Pan, Yen-Po Lin, Hung-Kuan Yen, Hung-Ho Yen, Chi-Ching Huang, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Wei-Hsin Lin, Hsiang-Chieh Hsieh","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003191","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003191","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: How to Make the Most of Open Notes. 社论:如何充分利用开放式笔记。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003197
Seth S Leopold, Clare M Rimnac, David Ring
{"title":"Editorial: How to Make the Most of Open Notes.","authors":"Seth S Leopold, Clare M Rimnac, David Ring","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003197","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003197","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419434/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Is the Association Between Agency and Levels of Capability and Comfort in Musculoskeletal Care? A Systematic Review. 在肌肉骨骼护理中,代理与能力和舒适度之间有何关联?系统综述。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003027
Rebecca Ludden, David Ring, Prakash Jayakumar
<p><strong>Background: </strong>People who take active responsibility for their health demonstrate agency. Agency in the context of chronic illness management with disease-modifying treatments is commonly linked to adherence and confidence in care seeking. In musculoskeletal health, agency is commonly observed in the accommodation of conditions related to aging and reflected in studies of people not seeking care. The development of agency measures originates from the realm of medical management of chronic illness rather than that of musculoskeletal disease, which is often optional or discretionary. With growing interest in the universal adoption of agency as a performance measure for quality payment programs, there is a need to better understand how agency is measured across musculoskeletal conditions, and how agency may be a modifiable correlate of capability, comfort, mindset, and circumstances.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>We systematically reviewed the evidence regarding agency among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care and asked: (1) Are greater levels of agency associated with greater levels of comfort and capability? (2) Are greater levels of agency associated with better mental and social health?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed searches on May 22, 2023, with searches spanning September 1988 (in PubMed and Web of Science) and September 1946 (in Ovid Medline) to May 2023. We included original clinical studies addressing the relationship between agency and levels of comfort, capability, mindset, and circumstances (by utilizing patient-reported agency measures [PRAMs], patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs], and mental and social health measures) involving adult patients 18 years or older receiving specialist care for musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 11 studies involving 3537 patients that addressed the primary research question and three studies involving 822 patients that addressed the secondary question. We conducted an evidence quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and found the overall evidence quality to be relatively high, with loss to follow-up and lack of reporting of sample size calculation the most consistent study shortcomings. The measures of capability varied by anatomical region. The Patient Activation Measure (a validated 10- or 13-item survey originally designed to assess a patient's level of understanding and confidence in managing their health and ability to engage in healthcare related to chronic medical illness) was used as a measure of agency in 10 studies (one of which also used the Effective Consumer Scale) and attitudes regarding one's management of musculoskeletal disorders in one study. We registered this systematic review on PROSPERO (Reg CRD42023426893).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, the relationships between PRAMs and PROMs are weak to moderate in strength using the Cohen
背景:对自己的健康积极负责的人具有能动性。在使用改变疾病疗法进行慢性病管理的情况下,"能动性 "通常与坚持治疗和对寻求护理的信心有关。在肌肉骨骼健康方面,代理通常体现在与老龄化相关的条件适应方面,并反映在对不寻求护理者的研究中。机构衡量标准的制定源于慢性疾病的医疗管理领域,而非肌肉骨骼疾病的医疗管理领域,后者通常是可选的或可自行决定的。随着人们对普遍采用 "代理 "作为质量支付计划的绩效衡量标准的兴趣日益浓厚,我们有必要更好地了解如何在各种肌肉骨骼疾病中衡量 "代理",以及 "代理 "如何成为能力、舒适度、心态和环境的可修改相关因素:我们系统地回顾了有关寻求肌肉骨骼专科治疗者的代理权的证据,并提出以下问题:(1)更高水平的代理权是否与更高水平的舒适度和能力相关?(2)更高的代理水平是否与更好的心理和社会健康相关?根据 PRISMA 指南,我们于 2023 年 5 月 22 日进行了检索,检索时间跨度为 1988 年 9 月(PubMed 和 Web of Science)和 1946 年 9 月(Ovid Medline)至 2023 年 5 月。我们纳入了涉及接受肌肉骨骼疾病专科治疗的 18 岁或以上成年患者的原始临床研究,这些研究探讨了代理与舒适度、能力、心态和环境水平之间的关系(采用患者报告的代理测量指标 [PRAMs]、患者报告的结果测量指标 [PROMs] 以及心理和社会健康测量指标)。我们确定了 11 项针对主要研究问题的研究和 3 项针对次要研究问题的研究,前者涉及 3537 名患者,后者涉及 822 名患者。我们使用非随机研究方法指数(MINORS)进行了证据质量评估,发现总体证据质量相对较高,随访损失和缺乏样本大小计算报告是研究中最常见的缺陷。不同解剖区域的能力衡量标准各不相同。有 10 项研究(其中一项研究还使用了有效消费者量表)使用了 "患者激活度量表"(一种经过验证的 10 或 13 个项目的调查表,最初设计用于评估患者对自身健康管理的理解程度和信心,以及参与与慢性疾病相关的医疗保健的能力)来衡量患者的代理能力,有一项研究使用了 "患者激活度量表 "来衡量患者对肌肉骨骼疾病管理的态度。我们在 PROSPERO(Reg CRD42023426893)上注册了这篇系统综述:总体而言,根据 Cohen 标准,PRAMs 与 PROMs 之间的关系强度为弱至中等,11 项研究中有 10 项研究表明代理水平与舒适度和能力水平之间存在关联。涉及心理健康的三项研究发现,代理水平与抑郁和焦虑症状水平之间的相关性较弱(如有报告):结论:研究发现,肌肉骨骼疾病患者的代理能力与舒适度、能力和心理健康水平相关,这支持在肌肉骨骼专科护理过程中优先考虑代理能力的改变。这可能包括行为健康和认知去势策略,以及促进自我管理的策略和服务。我们的工作还表明,有机会制定更适合酌情护理的机构测量方法,以更直接地评估健康心态、行为和对衰老过程中经历的不适和无能的包容态度的培养情况:二级,预后研究。
{"title":"What Is the Association Between Agency and Levels of Capability and Comfort in Musculoskeletal Care? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Rebecca Ludden, David Ring, Prakash Jayakumar","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003027","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003027","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;People who take active responsibility for their health demonstrate agency. Agency in the context of chronic illness management with disease-modifying treatments is commonly linked to adherence and confidence in care seeking. In musculoskeletal health, agency is commonly observed in the accommodation of conditions related to aging and reflected in studies of people not seeking care. The development of agency measures originates from the realm of medical management of chronic illness rather than that of musculoskeletal disease, which is often optional or discretionary. With growing interest in the universal adoption of agency as a performance measure for quality payment programs, there is a need to better understand how agency is measured across musculoskeletal conditions, and how agency may be a modifiable correlate of capability, comfort, mindset, and circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Questions/purposes: &lt;/strong&gt;We systematically reviewed the evidence regarding agency among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care and asked: (1) Are greater levels of agency associated with greater levels of comfort and capability? (2) Are greater levels of agency associated with better mental and social health?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed searches on May 22, 2023, with searches spanning September 1988 (in PubMed and Web of Science) and September 1946 (in Ovid Medline) to May 2023. We included original clinical studies addressing the relationship between agency and levels of comfort, capability, mindset, and circumstances (by utilizing patient-reported agency measures [PRAMs], patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs], and mental and social health measures) involving adult patients 18 years or older receiving specialist care for musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 11 studies involving 3537 patients that addressed the primary research question and three studies involving 822 patients that addressed the secondary question. We conducted an evidence quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and found the overall evidence quality to be relatively high, with loss to follow-up and lack of reporting of sample size calculation the most consistent study shortcomings. The measures of capability varied by anatomical region. The Patient Activation Measure (a validated 10- or 13-item survey originally designed to assess a patient's level of understanding and confidence in managing their health and ability to engage in healthcare related to chronic medical illness) was used as a measure of agency in 10 studies (one of which also used the Effective Consumer Scale) and attitudes regarding one's management of musculoskeletal disorders in one study. We registered this systematic review on PROSPERO (Reg CRD42023426893).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In general, the relationships between PRAMs and PROMs are weak to moderate in strength using the Cohen ","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140038888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Is the Patient-reported Outcome and Complication Incidence After Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Minimally Displaced Tibial Plateau Fractures? 胫骨平台微脱位骨折手术治疗与非手术治疗后的患者报告结果和并发症发生率如何?
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003057
Nick Assink, Thijs P Vaartjes, Christiaan J S A Kramer, Eelke Bosma, Robert J Nijveldt, Joost G Ten Brinke, Reinier de Groot, Harm Hoekstra, Frank F A IJpma
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Much controversy remains about whether minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures should be treated operatively or nonoperatively. It is generally accepted that gaps and stepoffs up to 2 mm can be tolerated, but this assumption is based on older studies using plain radiographs instead of CT to assess the degree of initial fracture displacement. Knowledge regarding the relationship between the degree of fracture displacement and expected functional outcome is crucial for patient counseling and shared decision-making, specifically in terms of whether to perform surgery.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Is operative treatment associated with improved patient-reported outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures (fractures with up to 4 mm of displacement)? (2) What is the difference in the risk of complications after operative versus nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, cross-sectional study was performed in patients treated for tibial plateau fractures between 2003 and 2019 at six hospitals. Between January 2003 and December 2019, a total of 2241 patients were treated for tibial plateau fractures at six different trauma centers. During that time, the general indication for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was intra-articular displacement of > 2 mm. Patients treated with ORIF and those treated nonoperatively were potentially eligible; 0.2% (4) were excluded because they were treated with amputation because of severe soft tissue damage, whereas 4% (89) were excluded because of coexisting conditions that complicated outcome measurement including Parkinson disease, cerebrovascular accident, or paralysis (conditions causing an inability to walk). A further 2.7% (60) were excluded because their address was unknown, and 1.4% (31) were excluded because they spoke a language other than Dutch. Based on that, 1328 patients were potentially eligible for analysis in the operative group and 729 were potentially eligible in the nonoperative group. At least 1 year after injury, all patients were approached and asked to complete the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS) questionnaire. A total of 813 operatively treated patients (response percentage: 61%) and 345 nonoperatively treated patients (response percentage: 47%) responded to the questionnaire. Patient characteristics including age, gender, BMI, smoking, and diabetes were retrieved from electronic patient records, and imaging data were shared with the initiating center. Displacement (gap and stepoff) was measured for all participating patients, and all patients with minimally displaced fractures (gap or stepoff ≤ 4 mm) were included, leaving 195 and 300 in the operative and nonoperative groups, respectively, for analysis here. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the association of treatment
应告知选择胫骨平台微移位骨折手术的患者,多达4%的患者可能会出现并发症,39%的患者可能会接受二次干预(其中大部分是选择性移除植入物):证据等级:三级,治疗性研究。
{"title":"What Is the Patient-reported Outcome and Complication Incidence After Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Minimally Displaced Tibial Plateau Fractures?","authors":"Nick Assink, Thijs P Vaartjes, Christiaan J S A Kramer, Eelke Bosma, Robert J Nijveldt, Joost G Ten Brinke, Reinier de Groot, Harm Hoekstra, Frank F A IJpma","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003057","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003057","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Much controversy remains about whether minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures should be treated operatively or nonoperatively. It is generally accepted that gaps and stepoffs up to 2 mm can be tolerated, but this assumption is based on older studies using plain radiographs instead of CT to assess the degree of initial fracture displacement. Knowledge regarding the relationship between the degree of fracture displacement and expected functional outcome is crucial for patient counseling and shared decision-making, specifically in terms of whether to perform surgery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Questions/purposes: &lt;/strong&gt;(1) Is operative treatment associated with improved patient-reported outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures (fractures with up to 4 mm of displacement)? (2) What is the difference in the risk of complications after operative versus nonoperative treatment in minimally displaced tibial plateau fractures?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A multicenter, cross-sectional study was performed in patients treated for tibial plateau fractures between 2003 and 2019 at six hospitals. Between January 2003 and December 2019, a total of 2241 patients were treated for tibial plateau fractures at six different trauma centers. During that time, the general indication for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was intra-articular displacement of &gt; 2 mm. Patients treated with ORIF and those treated nonoperatively were potentially eligible; 0.2% (4) were excluded because they were treated with amputation because of severe soft tissue damage, whereas 4% (89) were excluded because of coexisting conditions that complicated outcome measurement including Parkinson disease, cerebrovascular accident, or paralysis (conditions causing an inability to walk). A further 2.7% (60) were excluded because their address was unknown, and 1.4% (31) were excluded because they spoke a language other than Dutch. Based on that, 1328 patients were potentially eligible for analysis in the operative group and 729 were potentially eligible in the nonoperative group. At least 1 year after injury, all patients were approached and asked to complete the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS) questionnaire. A total of 813 operatively treated patients (response percentage: 61%) and 345 nonoperatively treated patients (response percentage: 47%) responded to the questionnaire. Patient characteristics including age, gender, BMI, smoking, and diabetes were retrieved from electronic patient records, and imaging data were shared with the initiating center. Displacement (gap and stepoff) was measured for all participating patients, and all patients with minimally displaced fractures (gap or stepoff ≤ 4 mm) were included, leaving 195 and 300 in the operative and nonoperative groups, respectively, for analysis here. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the association of treatment","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419509/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CORR Insights®: Very Few ACGME-accredited Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs Have Web-accessible Leave Policies Dedicated to Parental Leave for Residents, Despite ACGME Requirements. CORR Insights®:尽管 ACGME 有要求,但只有极少数 ACGME 认可的矫形外科住院医师项目有专门针对住院医师育儿假的网络可访问休假政策。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003147
Christina K Hardesty
{"title":"CORR Insights®: Very Few ACGME-accredited Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs Have Web-accessible Leave Policies Dedicated to Parental Leave for Residents, Despite ACGME Requirements.","authors":"Christina K Hardesty","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003147","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003147","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141426488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CORR Insights®: The Forgotten Joint Score Is a Valid Outcome Measure for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study. CORR Insights®:被遗忘的关节评分是衡量全踝关节置换术效果的有效指标:前瞻性研究。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003137
Gregory P Guyton
{"title":"CORR Insights®: The Forgotten Joint Score Is a Valid Outcome Measure for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Gregory P Guyton","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003137","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003137","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419416/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141283116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1