Objective: To examine the effects of the transitional tele-rehabilitation programme on quality of life of adult burn survivors.
Design: A prospective, single centre, randomised controlled trial and reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.
Participants: Adult burn survivors aged ≥18 years with burn size ≥10% total body surface area irrespective of the depth was considered eligible to participate.
Intervention: The intervention was in two phases: pre-discharge and active follow-up phase (which occurred via WeChat). In both phases, comprehensive assessment and intervention guided by the Omaha System and evidenced-based protocols guided the care delivery over an 8-week period.
Main measures: The outcome of interest was quality of life. Two outcome measures were used to assess the outcome of interest: Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) and the EQ-5D-5L tools. The outcome was assessed at three time points: T0 (baseline), T1 (immediate post-intervention) and T2 (4 weeks from T1).
Results: In total, 60 adult burn survivors were randomly allocated to undergo the new programme. The transitional tele-rehabilitation programme elicited statistically significant improvement in simple abilities, affect, interpersonal relationship (T2) and overall quality life (T1 and T2) measured on the BSHS-B.
Conclusion: Ongoing rehabilitative care is essential to support the recovery process of burn survivors considering that some quality-of-life subscales may improve faster than others. The study findings highlight the potential of employing a social media platform to improve post-burn quality of life outcomes.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04517721. Registered on 20 August 2020.
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of exercise in improving body composition in patients with breast cancer; the effects of exercise on weight and BMI were evaluated as secondary outcomes.
Data sources: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials published in English from database inception to 29 November 2023.
Methods: The effects of exercise on body composition in patients with breast cancer were explored. After separately extracting the data, two reviewers assessed the overall quality of the evidence as well as the methodological quality of the included studies.
Results: Fourteen studies with 1241 participants were included, of which 12 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Exercise significantly reduced body fat (mean difference [MD], -0.33; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.29; P < 0.00001) and increased lean mass (MD, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.49; P < 0.00001) in patients with breast cancer. Further, exercise intervention was associated with increased BMI of patients with breast cancer (MD, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06; P = 0.01), while no significant difference in weight was detected between the exercise and the non-exercise groups. Subgroup analysis results showed that only resistance exercise reduced fat mass (MD, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.27 to -0.16; P < 0.00001).
Conclusions: Exercise effectively improves body composition in patients with breast cancer. Clinicians should encourage patients to engage in exercise and develop optimized exercise prescriptions.
Objectives: To investigate the perceptions of primary care nurses and physicians of the potential contributions of physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) in the treatment of frail older persons, as well as the obstacles to, and opportunities for, collaboration.
Design: A qualitative study.
Participants and setting: Nurses (n = 9) and physicians (n = 8) in primary care in the county council [14 women (82%)] with experience working with older people.
Method: Interview study conducted with a semi-structured interview guide. Analyses were carried out with content analysis with an inductive approach.
Results: The analysis resulted in six categories: knowledge of physiotherapy and occupational therapy interventions; what triggers the need for physiotherapy and occupational therapy?; the availability of rehabilitation interventions; teamwork opportunities and difficulties; motivating the patient; the site of the rehabilitation.
Conclusions: Close and clear collaboration between nurses and physicians and PTs and OTs is an important factor in ensuring that rehabilitation interventions provide the greatest possible benefit to the patient. Improving communication between different healthcare providers and clarifying the contact routes is a prerequisite for patients to be able to get the rehabilitation they need. More research is needed to determine the best approach to achieving this goal.
Objective: To simultaneously explore the perspectives and opinions of different invested participant groups on the important considerations for development of upper limb behavioural interventions that drive optimal post-stroke upper limb motor recovery.
Design: A qualitative descriptive study in a constructivist epistemology.
Participants: Purposively selected participant groups (preclinical research n = 9, clinical research n = 9, clinical experience n = 9 and lived experience n = 10).
Setting: Research participants were selected from top internationally published authors. Experiential participants were recruited internationally, through networks.
Results: Four themes were identified with embedded subthemes. Theme 1: 'Clinical relevance should be the core of a "good" research question' with two subthemes: 'Breaking down silos: forging interdisciplinary research teams', and 'Beyond the pipeline: bench to bedside and back'; theme 2: 'Balance restitution and compensation to maximise outcomes' with three subthemes: 'Good outcome: going beyond an outcome measure', 'Recovery is a puzzle: measure all the pieces', and 'Optimising capacity: knowing when and how'; theme 3: 'Stroke demands personalised solutions' with two subthemes: 'Condition-specific considerations', and 'Person-specific considerations'; theme 4: 'Upper limb recovery requires complex interventions' with four subthemes: 'Fuelling engagement', 'Content is crucial', 'Multidimensional dose', and 'Therapist sway'.
Conclusions: This study suggests that post-stroke upper limb motor interventions are the interactions of multiple intervention elements (e.g. dose and content) shaped by different contextual considerations (e.g. stroke and personal factors). Development of such interventions may need to consider both content and context of the intervention to drive optimal recovery.