Background: Procalcitonin is known to have moderate diagnostic accuracy for bacteremia. A 2014 meta-analysis showed a 76% sensitivity for a 0.50 ng/mL threshold. Lower thresholds might improve sensitivity.
Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for community-acquired bacteremia by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis, focusing on the ability to exclude bacteremia.
Methods data sources: We searched PUBMED, EMBASE and Web of Science from the 1st of January 2014 up to the 20th of May 2025.
Study eligibility criteria and participants: Articles studying diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for community-acquired bacteremia in adults.
Test and reference standard: Procalcitonin was compared to blood culture results.
Assessment of risk of bias: Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Methods of data synthesis: We pooled sensitivity/specificity with a bivariate random-effects model and created a summary receiver-operating (sROC) curve. The main analysis focused on studies reporting on a procalcitonin threshold of 0.10 ng/mL. In addition, we analysed results for all studies, studies with a 0.25 ng/mL and studies with a 0.50 ng/mL threshold.
Results: We included 40 out of 5450 identified articles, reflecting 192.529 patients of whom 31.480 (16%) had bacteremia. 32 out of 40 studies had high risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity for a 0.10 ng/mL threshold was 93% (95% CI: 85% - 97%) with a specificity of 36% (95% CI: 26% to 47%). The area under the sROC curve for all studies was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.83), prediction interval (PI) 0.57 - 0.91.
Discussion: A low cut-off value of PCT can be useful to exclude community-acquired bacteremia, depending on what the treating clinician considers to be an acceptable trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. Procalcitonin may require combination with clinical characteristics for accurate assessment of the risk of bacteremia and safely reducing unnecessary blood cultures.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
