首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Infectious Diseases最新文献

英文 中文
2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on the Management of COVID-19: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Pemivibart for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis. 2024 美国传染病学会关于 COVID-19 管理的临床实践指南更新:用于暴露前预防的抗 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体 Pemivibart。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae435
Adarsh Bhimraj, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Arthur Y Kim, Jonathan Z Li, Lindsey R Baden, Steven Johnson, Robert W Shafer, Shmuel Shoham, Pablo Tebas, Roger Bedimo, Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng, Kara W Chew, Kathleen Chiotos, Eric S Daar, Amy L Dzierba, David V Glidden, Erica J Hardy, Greg S Martin, Christine MacBrayne, Nandita Nadig, Mari M Nakamura, Amy Hirsch Shumaker, Phyllis Tien, Jennifer Loveless, Rebecca L Morgan, Rajesh T Gandhi

This article provides a focused update to the clinical practice guideline on the treatment and management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The guideline panel presents a recommendation on the use of the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralizing antibody pemivibart as pre-exposure prophylaxis. The recommendation is based on evidence derived from a systematic review and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Information on pemivibart is included in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization for this agent.

本文重点更新了美国传染病学会制定的《2019 年冠状病毒疾病患者治疗和管理临床实践指南》。指南专家小组推荐使用抗严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 中和抗体培米巴特作为暴露前预防。该建议基于系统综述中获得的证据,并按照 GRADE(建议、评估、发展和评价分级)方法对证据的确定性和建议的力度进行了标准化评级。有关培米巴特的信息已收录在美国食品和药物管理局对该药物的紧急使用授权中。
{"title":"2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on the Management of COVID-19: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Pemivibart for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis.","authors":"Adarsh Bhimraj, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Arthur Y Kim, Jonathan Z Li, Lindsey R Baden, Steven Johnson, Robert W Shafer, Shmuel Shoham, Pablo Tebas, Roger Bedimo, Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng, Kara W Chew, Kathleen Chiotos, Eric S Daar, Amy L Dzierba, David V Glidden, Erica J Hardy, Greg S Martin, Christine MacBrayne, Nandita Nadig, Mari M Nakamura, Amy Hirsch Shumaker, Phyllis Tien, Jennifer Loveless, Rebecca L Morgan, Rajesh T Gandhi","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article provides a focused update to the clinical practice guideline on the treatment and management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The guideline panel presents a recommendation on the use of the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralizing antibody pemivibart as pre-exposure prophylaxis. The recommendation is based on evidence derived from a systematic review and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Information on pemivibart is included in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization for this agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspectives of people with HIV on implementing long acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine in clinics and community settings in the UK: results from the anti-sexist, anti-racist, anti-ageist ILANA study. 艾滋病毒感染者对在英国诊所和社区环境中实施长效卡博替拉韦加利匹韦林的看法:反性别歧视、反种族主义、反年龄歧视 ILANA 研究的结果。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae523
Chloe Orkin, Rosalie Hayes, Joanne Haviland, Yuk Lam Wong, Kyle Ring, Vanessa Apea, Bakita Kasadha, Emily Clarke, Ruth Byrne, Julie Fox, Tristan J Barber, Amanda Clarke, Sara Paparini

Introduction: The equity-focused ILANA study evaluated feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness of delivering on-label two-monthly cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) injections for HIV-1 therapy in clinics and community settings.

Methods: The study, which mandated inclusive recruitment, was conducted May-December 2022 at six UK sites. Injections were delivered in clinic (months 1-6), and in clinic or community setting according to patient choice (months 6-12). Surveys were completed at baseline, M4 and M12 using validated measures for feasibility (FIM), acceptability (AIM), and appropriateness (IAM). Primary endpoint: proportion of participants agreeing that the injection and community setting were feasible (FIM>4) at M12. Fourteen participants completed interviews at baseline and M12.

Results: Community settings offered by sites included: home visits (n=3), HIV support organisations (n=2), community clinic (n=1). Of 114 participants,54% were female, 70% racially minoritised and 40% aged >50. 27/114 chose to receive injections in community settings. FIM/AIM/IAM scores at M12 were high for the injection (79.0-87.4%) and lower for the community setting (44.2-47.4%) overall. Subgroup analyses indicated differences in scores by gender and ethnicity. Among those who attended the community, FIM/AIM/IAM scores for the community setting at M12 were high (73.1-80.8%). Concerns about stigma, inconvenience, and losing access to trusted clinicians negatively influenced perceptions of receiving injections at community settings, amongst other factors.

Conclusion: CAB+RPV injections were considered highly feasible, acceptable, and appropriate, however few chose community delivery. Those that chose community delivery found it highly acceptable and feasible. Further exploration of CAB+RPV delivery in alternative community sites not offered (e.g. primary care or pharmacies) is warranted.

简介:以公平为重点的 ILANA 研究评估了在标签上提供两个月卡博特韦和利匹韦林(CAB+RPV)的可行性、可接受性和适当性:以公平为重点的ILANA研究评估了在诊所和社区环境中提供标签上的两个月一次的卡博替拉韦和利匹韦林(CAB+RPV)注射治疗HIV-1的可行性、可接受性和适宜性:这项研究要求进行全面招募,于 2022 年 5 月至 12 月在英国的六个地点进行。注射在诊所进行(第 1-6 个月),根据患者选择在诊所或社区进行(第 6-12 个月)。在基线期、M4 期和 M12 期,使用经过验证的可行性(FIM)、可接受性(AIM)和适当性(IAM)测量方法完成调查。主要终点:在 M12 时,同意注射和社区环境可行(FIM>4)的参与者比例。14 名参与者完成了基线和 M12 期的访谈:调查点提供的社区环境包括:家访(3 人)、艾滋病支持组织(2 人)、社区诊所(1 人)。在 114 名参与者中,54% 为女性,70% 为少数民族,40% 年龄在 50 岁以上。27/114 人选择在社区环境中接受注射。在 M12 期,注射的 FIM/AIM/IAM 得分较高(79.0-87.4%),而社区环境的总体得分较低(44.2-47.4%)。分组分析表明,不同性别和种族的得分存在差异。在参加社区活动的患者中,M12 时社区环境的 FIM/AIM/IAM 得分较高(73.1-80.8%)。除其他因素外,对耻辱感、不便和失去可信赖的临床医生的担忧对在社区接受注射的看法产生了负面影响:人们认为 CAB+RPV 注射非常可行、可接受且合适,但选择社区注射的人很少。选择社区注射的人则认为其可接受性和可行性很高。有必要进一步探讨在未提供的其他社区场所(如初级保健或药房)进行 CAB+RPV 注射的问题。
{"title":"Perspectives of people with HIV on implementing long acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine in clinics and community settings in the UK: results from the anti-sexist, anti-racist, anti-ageist ILANA study.","authors":"Chloe Orkin, Rosalie Hayes, Joanne Haviland, Yuk Lam Wong, Kyle Ring, Vanessa Apea, Bakita Kasadha, Emily Clarke, Ruth Byrne, Julie Fox, Tristan J Barber, Amanda Clarke, Sara Paparini","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The equity-focused ILANA study evaluated feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness of delivering on-label two-monthly cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) injections for HIV-1 therapy in clinics and community settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study, which mandated inclusive recruitment, was conducted May-December 2022 at six UK sites. Injections were delivered in clinic (months 1-6), and in clinic or community setting according to patient choice (months 6-12). Surveys were completed at baseline, M4 and M12 using validated measures for feasibility (FIM), acceptability (AIM), and appropriateness (IAM). Primary endpoint: proportion of participants agreeing that the injection and community setting were feasible (FIM>4) at M12. Fourteen participants completed interviews at baseline and M12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Community settings offered by sites included: home visits (n=3), HIV support organisations (n=2), community clinic (n=1). Of 114 participants,54% were female, 70% racially minoritised and 40% aged >50. 27/114 chose to receive injections in community settings. FIM/AIM/IAM scores at M12 were high for the injection (79.0-87.4%) and lower for the community setting (44.2-47.4%) overall. Subgroup analyses indicated differences in scores by gender and ethnicity. Among those who attended the community, FIM/AIM/IAM scores for the community setting at M12 were high (73.1-80.8%). Concerns about stigma, inconvenience, and losing access to trusted clinicians negatively influenced perceptions of receiving injections at community settings, amongst other factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAB+RPV injections were considered highly feasible, acceptable, and appropriate, however few chose community delivery. Those that chose community delivery found it highly acceptable and feasible. Further exploration of CAB+RPV delivery in alternative community sites not offered (e.g. primary care or pharmacies) is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142496384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public Health Benefits of Applying Evidence-Based Best Practices in Managing Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 应用循证最佳实践管理 COVID-19 住院患者的公共卫生效益
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae517
Andre C Kalil, Aastha Chandak, Luke S P Moore, Neera Ahuja, Martin Kolditz, Roman Casciano, Ananth Kadambi, Mohsen Yaghoubi, Sotirios Tsiodras, Jakob J Malin, Essy Mozaffari, Michele Bartoletti
Background As COVID-19-related mortality remains a concern, optimal management of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 continues to evolve. We developed a population model based on real-world evidence to quantify the clinical impact of increased utilization of remdesivir, the effectiveness of which has been well established in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods The PINC AI healthcare database records for patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from January to December 2023 were stratified by those treated with or without remdesivir (“RDV” and “No RDV”) and by supplemental oxygen requirements: no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc), low-flow oxygen (LFO), and high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation (HFO/NIV). Key vulnerable subgroups such as elderly and immunocompromised patients were also evaluated. The model applied previously published hazard ratios (HRs) to 28-day in-hospital mortality incidence to determine the number of potential lives saved if additional “No RDV” patients had been treated with remdesivir upon hospital admission. Results Of 84,810 hospitalizations for COVID-19 in 2023, 13,233 “No RDV” patients were similar in terms of characteristics and clinical presentation to the “RDV” patients. The model predicted that initiation of remdesivir in these patients could have saved 231 lives. Projected nationally, this translates to &gt;800 potential lives saved (95% CI: 469-1,126). Eighty-nine percent of potential lives saved were elderly and 19% were immunocompromised individuals. Seventy-one percent were among NSOc or LFO patients. Conclusions This public health model underscores the value of initiating remdesivir upon admission in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, in accordance with evidence-based best practices, to minimize lives lost due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
背景 由于 COVID-19 相关死亡率仍是一个令人担忧的问题,因此对 COVID-19 住院患者的最佳管理仍在不断发展。我们根据现实世界的证据建立了一个人群模型,以量化增加使用雷米替韦的临床影响,雷米替韦对 COVID-19 住院患者的有效性已得到充分证实。方法 将 2023 年 1 月至 12 月期间因 COVID-19 住院患者的 PINC AI 医疗数据库记录按使用或未使用雷米替韦治疗("RDV "和 "无 RDV")以及补充氧需求进行分层:无补充氧费用 (NSOc)、低流量吸氧 (LFO) 和高流量吸氧/无创通气 (HFO/NIV)。此外,还对老年人和免疫力低下患者等主要易感亚组进行了评估。该模型将之前公布的危险比(HRs)应用于 28 天院内死亡率,以确定如果更多 "无 RDV "患者在入院时接受雷米替韦治疗,可能挽救的生命数量。结果 在2023年因COVID-19住院的84810例患者中,有13233例 "无RDV "患者的特征和临床表现与 "RDV "患者相似。根据模型预测,对这些患者使用雷米替韦可挽救 231 条生命。在全国范围内推算,这相当于&gt;800个潜在挽救的生命(95% CI:469-1,126)。在可能挽救的生命中,89% 是老年人,19% 是免疫力低下者。71%为非传染性疾病或低氧血症患者。结论 这一公共卫生模式强调了根据循证最佳实践在 COVID-19 住院患者入院时开始使用雷米替韦的价值,以最大限度地减少因感染 SARS-CoV-2 而导致的生命损失。
{"title":"Public Health Benefits of Applying Evidence-Based Best Practices in Managing Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19","authors":"Andre C Kalil, Aastha Chandak, Luke S P Moore, Neera Ahuja, Martin Kolditz, Roman Casciano, Ananth Kadambi, Mohsen Yaghoubi, Sotirios Tsiodras, Jakob J Malin, Essy Mozaffari, Michele Bartoletti","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae517","url":null,"abstract":"Background As COVID-19-related mortality remains a concern, optimal management of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 continues to evolve. We developed a population model based on real-world evidence to quantify the clinical impact of increased utilization of remdesivir, the effectiveness of which has been well established in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods The PINC AI healthcare database records for patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from January to December 2023 were stratified by those treated with or without remdesivir (“RDV” and “No RDV”) and by supplemental oxygen requirements: no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc), low-flow oxygen (LFO), and high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation (HFO/NIV). Key vulnerable subgroups such as elderly and immunocompromised patients were also evaluated. The model applied previously published hazard ratios (HRs) to 28-day in-hospital mortality incidence to determine the number of potential lives saved if additional “No RDV” patients had been treated with remdesivir upon hospital admission. Results Of 84,810 hospitalizations for COVID-19 in 2023, 13,233 “No RDV” patients were similar in terms of characteristics and clinical presentation to the “RDV” patients. The model predicted that initiation of remdesivir in these patients could have saved 231 lives. Projected nationally, this translates to &amp;gt;800 potential lives saved (95% CI: 469-1,126). Eighty-nine percent of potential lives saved were elderly and 19% were immunocompromised individuals. Seventy-one percent were among NSOc or LFO patients. Conclusions This public health model underscores the value of initiating remdesivir upon admission in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, in accordance with evidence-based best practices, to minimize lives lost due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Illness and Asymptomatic Infection in 2022-2023: A Prospective Cohort Study. 2022-2023 年流感疫苗预防疾病和无症状感染的有效性:前瞻性队列研究
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae491
Elizabeth B White,Lauren Grant,Josephine Mak,Lauren Olsho,Laura J Edwards,Allison Naleway,Jefferey L Burgess,Katherine D Ellingson,Harmony Tyner,Manjusha Gaglani,Karen Lutrick,Alberto Caban-Martinez,Gabriella Newes-Adeyi,Jazmin Duque,Sarang K Yoon,Andrew L Phillips,Mark Thompson,Amadea Britton,Brendan Flannery,Ashley Fowlkes
BACKGROUNDPrevious estimates of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against asymptomatic influenza virus infection based on seroconversion have varied widely and may be biased. We estimated 2022-2023 influenza VE against illness and asymptomatic infection in a prospective cohort.METHODSIn the HEROES-RECOVER cohort, adults at increased occupational risk of influenza exposure across 7 US sites provided weekly symptom reports and nasal swabs for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) influenza testing. Laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections were classified as symptomatic (≥1 symptom) or asymptomatic during the week of testing. Participants reported demographic information and vaccination through surveys; most sites verified vaccination through medical record and immunization registry review. Person-time was calculated as days from the site-specific influenza season start (September-October 2022) through date of infection, study withdrawal, or season end (May 2023). We compared influenza incidence among vaccinated versus unvaccinated participants overall, by symptom status, and by influenza A subtype, using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for site and occupation. We estimated VE as (1 - adjusted hazard ratio) × 100%.RESULTSIn total, 269 of 3785 (7.1%) participants had laboratory-confirmed influenza, including 263 (98%) influenza A virus infections and 201 (75%) symptomatic illnesses. Incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza illness among vaccinated versus unvaccinated participants was 23.7 and 33.2 episodes per 100 000 person-days, respectively (VE: 38%; 95% CI: 15%-55%). Incidence of asymptomatic influenza virus infection was 8.0 versus 11.6 per 100 000 (VE: 13%; 95% CI: -47%, 49%).CONCLUSIONSVaccination reduced incidence of symptomatic but not asymptomatic influenza virus infection, suggesting that influenza vaccination attenuates progression from infection to illness.
背景以前根据血清转换估计的预防无症状流感病毒感染的疫苗有效性(VE)差异很大,而且可能存在偏差。方法在 HEROES-RECOVER 队列中,美国 7 个地方的流感职业暴露风险较高的成年人每周提供症状报告和鼻拭子,用于反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)流感检测。实验室确诊的流感病毒感染分为有症状(≥1 个症状)和无症状。参与者通过调查报告人口统计学信息和疫苗接种情况;大多数研究机构通过病历和免疫登记审查核实疫苗接种情况。接种时间是指从特定地点的流感季节开始(2022 年 9 月至 10 月)到感染、退出研究或季节结束(2023 年 5 月)的天数。我们使用经地点和职业调整的 Cox 比例危险度回归法,比较了接种疫苗与未接种疫苗参与者的总体流感发病率、症状状态和甲型流感亚型。结果 在 3785 名参与者中,共有 269 人(7.1%)经实验室确诊患有流感,其中 263 人(98%)感染了甲型流感病毒,201 人(75%)无症状。接种疫苗与未接种疫苗的参与者中,经实验室确诊的流感发病率分别为每 10 万人日 23.7 例和 33.2 例(VE:38%;95% CI:15%-55%)。结论接种疫苗可降低无症状流感病毒感染的发病率,但不能降低无症状流感病毒感染的发病率,这表明接种流感疫苗可减轻从感染到发病的过程。
{"title":"Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Illness and Asymptomatic Infection in 2022-2023: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Elizabeth B White,Lauren Grant,Josephine Mak,Lauren Olsho,Laura J Edwards,Allison Naleway,Jefferey L Burgess,Katherine D Ellingson,Harmony Tyner,Manjusha Gaglani,Karen Lutrick,Alberto Caban-Martinez,Gabriella Newes-Adeyi,Jazmin Duque,Sarang K Yoon,Andrew L Phillips,Mark Thompson,Amadea Britton,Brendan Flannery,Ashley Fowlkes","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae491","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDPrevious estimates of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against asymptomatic influenza virus infection based on seroconversion have varied widely and may be biased. We estimated 2022-2023 influenza VE against illness and asymptomatic infection in a prospective cohort.METHODSIn the HEROES-RECOVER cohort, adults at increased occupational risk of influenza exposure across 7 US sites provided weekly symptom reports and nasal swabs for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) influenza testing. Laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections were classified as symptomatic (≥1 symptom) or asymptomatic during the week of testing. Participants reported demographic information and vaccination through surveys; most sites verified vaccination through medical record and immunization registry review. Person-time was calculated as days from the site-specific influenza season start (September-October 2022) through date of infection, study withdrawal, or season end (May 2023). We compared influenza incidence among vaccinated versus unvaccinated participants overall, by symptom status, and by influenza A subtype, using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for site and occupation. We estimated VE as (1 - adjusted hazard ratio) × 100%.RESULTSIn total, 269 of 3785 (7.1%) participants had laboratory-confirmed influenza, including 263 (98%) influenza A virus infections and 201 (75%) symptomatic illnesses. Incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza illness among vaccinated versus unvaccinated participants was 23.7 and 33.2 episodes per 100 000 person-days, respectively (VE: 38%; 95% CI: 15%-55%). Incidence of asymptomatic influenza virus infection was 8.0 versus 11.6 per 100 000 (VE: 13%; 95% CI: -47%, 49%).CONCLUSIONSVaccination reduced incidence of symptomatic but not asymptomatic influenza virus infection, suggesting that influenza vaccination attenuates progression from infection to illness.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remdesivir for Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Evidence of Effectiveness from Cohort Studies in the Omicron Era 雷米替韦治疗 COVID-19 住院患者:欧米茄时代队列研究的有效性证据
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae515
Daniel R Kuritzkes
Remdesivir is the only antiviral approved for treatment of persons hospitalized for COVID-19. This supplement presents new information from real-world cohort studies reporting reduced mortality in at-risk populations and reductions in re-admission for COVID-19 in the Omicron era.
雷米替韦是唯一获准用于治疗 COVID-19 住院患者的抗病毒药物。本增刊介绍了来自真实世界队列研究的新信息,这些研究报告显示,在 Omicron 时代,高危人群的死亡率降低了,COVID-19 的再入院率也降低了。
{"title":"Remdesivir for Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Evidence of Effectiveness from Cohort Studies in the Omicron Era","authors":"Daniel R Kuritzkes","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae515","url":null,"abstract":"Remdesivir is the only antiviral approved for treatment of persons hospitalized for COVID-19. This supplement presents new information from real-world cohort studies reporting reduced mortality in at-risk populations and reductions in re-admission for COVID-19 in the Omicron era.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142488862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative safety of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of outpatient community-acquired pneumonia among otherwise healthy adults 不同抗生素方案治疗门诊社区获得性肺炎的安全性比较
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae519
Anne M Butler, Katelin B Nickel, Margaret A Olsen, John M Sahrmann, Ryan Colvin, Elizabeth Neuner, Caroline A O’Neil, Victoria J Fraser, Michael J Durkin
Background Evidence is limited about the comparative safety of antibiotic regimens for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We compared the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with antibiotic regimens for CAP treatment among otherwise healthy, non-elderly adults. Methods We conducted an active comparator new-user cohort study (2007-2019) of commercially-insured adults 18–64 years diagnosed with outpatient CAP, evaluated via chest x-ray, and dispensed a same-day CAP-related oral antibiotic regimen. ADE follow-up duration ranged from 2–90 days (e.g., renal failure [14 days]). We estimated risk differences [RD] per 100 treatment episodes and risk ratios using propensity score weighted Kaplan-Meier functions. Ankle/knee sprain and influenza vaccination were considered as negative control outcomes. Results Of 145,137 otherwise healthy CAP patients without comorbidities, 52% received narrow-spectrum regimens (44% macrolide, 8% doxycycline) and 48% received broad-spectrum regimens (39% fluoroquinolone, 7% β-lactam, 3% β-lactam + macrolide). Compared to macrolide monotherapy, each broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen was associated with increased risk of several ADEs (e.g., β-lactam: nausea/vomiting/abdominal pain [RD per 100, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10–0.57]; non-Clostridioides difficile diarrhea [RD per 100, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.68]; vulvovaginal candidiasis/vaginitis [RD per 100, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.09–0.69]). Narrow-spectrum antibiotic regimens largely conferred similar risk of ADEs. We generally observed similar risks of each negative control outcome, indicating minimal confounding. Conclusions Broad-spectrum antibiotics were associated with increased risk of ADEs among otherwise healthy adults treated for CAP in the outpatient setting. Antimicrobial stewardship is needed to promote judicious use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and ultimately decrease antibiotic-related ADEs.
背景 关于治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的抗生素方案的安全性比较证据有限。我们比较了与抗生素治疗方案相关的药物不良事件 (ADE) 风险,这些抗生素用于治疗其他健康的非老年成年人的 CAP。方法 我们对 18-64 岁的商业保险成年人进行了一项新用户队列研究(2007-2019 年),这些成年人在门诊被诊断为 CAP,通过胸部 X 光片进行了评估,并在当天获得了与 CAP 相关的口服抗生素治疗方案。ADE 随访时间为 2-90 天(如肾衰竭 [14 天])。我们使用倾向得分加权卡普兰-梅耶函数估算了每 100 次治疗的风险差异 [RD] 和风险比。踝关节/膝关节扭伤和流感疫苗接种被视为阴性对照结果。结果 在145137名无合并症的健康CAP患者中,52%接受了窄谱疗法(44%大环内酯类,8%强力霉素),48%接受了广谱疗法(39%氟喹诺酮类,7%β-内酰胺类,3%β-内酰胺类+大环内酯类)。与单用大环内酯类药物相比,每种广谱抗生素方案都会增加几种 ADE 的风险(如β-内酰胺类:恶心/呕吐/腹痛[RD/100,0.32;95% CI,0.10-0.57];非梭菌性艰难梭菌腹泻[RD/100,0.46;95% CI,0.25-0.68];外阴阴道念珠菌病/阴道炎[RD/100,0.36;95% CI,0.09-0.69])。窄谱抗生素治疗方案的ADEs风险基本相似。我们普遍观察到每种阴性对照结果的风险相似,这表明混杂因素极少。结论 在门诊环境中接受 CAP 治疗的健康成人中,广谱抗生素与 ADE 风险增加有关。需要加强抗菌药物管理以促进广谱抗生素的合理使用,并最终减少与抗生素相关的 ADE。
{"title":"Comparative safety of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of outpatient community-acquired pneumonia among otherwise healthy adults","authors":"Anne M Butler, Katelin B Nickel, Margaret A Olsen, John M Sahrmann, Ryan Colvin, Elizabeth Neuner, Caroline A O’Neil, Victoria J Fraser, Michael J Durkin","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae519","url":null,"abstract":"Background Evidence is limited about the comparative safety of antibiotic regimens for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We compared the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with antibiotic regimens for CAP treatment among otherwise healthy, non-elderly adults. Methods We conducted an active comparator new-user cohort study (2007-2019) of commercially-insured adults 18–64 years diagnosed with outpatient CAP, evaluated via chest x-ray, and dispensed a same-day CAP-related oral antibiotic regimen. ADE follow-up duration ranged from 2–90 days (e.g., renal failure [14 days]). We estimated risk differences [RD] per 100 treatment episodes and risk ratios using propensity score weighted Kaplan-Meier functions. Ankle/knee sprain and influenza vaccination were considered as negative control outcomes. Results Of 145,137 otherwise healthy CAP patients without comorbidities, 52% received narrow-spectrum regimens (44% macrolide, 8% doxycycline) and 48% received broad-spectrum regimens (39% fluoroquinolone, 7% β-lactam, 3% β-lactam + macrolide). Compared to macrolide monotherapy, each broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen was associated with increased risk of several ADEs (e.g., β-lactam: nausea/vomiting/abdominal pain [RD per 100, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10–0.57]; non-Clostridioides difficile diarrhea [RD per 100, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.68]; vulvovaginal candidiasis/vaginitis [RD per 100, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.09–0.69]). Narrow-spectrum antibiotic regimens largely conferred similar risk of ADEs. We generally observed similar risks of each negative control outcome, indicating minimal confounding. Conclusions Broad-spectrum antibiotics were associated with increased risk of ADEs among otherwise healthy adults treated for CAP in the outpatient setting. Antimicrobial stewardship is needed to promote judicious use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and ultimately decrease antibiotic-related ADEs.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142488863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiological and clinical features of a large blastomycosis outbreak at a paper mill in Michigan. 密歇根州一家造纸厂爆发的大规模囊霉菌病的流行病学和临床特征。
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae513
Ian Hennessee,Sara Palmer,Rebecca Reik,Arianna Miles-Jay,Muhammad Yasir Nawaz,Heather M Blankenship,Rebecca Kramer,Adam Hughes,Michael Snyder,Robert L Yin,Anastasia P Litvintseva,Lindsay A Parnell,Lalitha Gade,Tom Chiller,Marie A de Perio,Mary Grace Stobierski,Jevon McFadden,Mitsuru Toda,
BACKGROUNDBlastomycosis is an environmentally acquired fungal infection that can result in severe pulmonary illness and high hospitalization rates. In 2023, a blastomycosis outbreak was detected among workers at a paper mill in Delta County, Michigan.METHODSWe included patients with clinical and laboratory evidence of blastomycosis who had spent ≥40 hours in Delta County since September 1, 2022 and had illness onset December 1, 2022-July 1, 2023. We assessed epidemiological and clinical features of patients and evaluated factors associated with hospitalization. We performed whole-genome sequencing to characterize genetic relatedness of clinical isolates from eight patients.RESULTSIn total, 131 patients were identified; all had worked at or visited the mill. Sixteen patients (12%) were hospitalized; one died. Compared with non-hospitalized patients, more hospitalized patients had diabetes (p=0.03) and urine antigen titers above the lower limit of quantification (p<0.001). Hospitalized patients were also more likely to have had ≥1 healthcare visits before receiving a blastomycosis diagnostic test (p=0.02) and to have been treated with antibiotics prior to antifungal prescription (p=0.001). All sequenced isolates were identified as Blastomyces gilchristii and clustered into a distinct outbreak cluster.CONCLUSIONSThis was the largest documented blastomycosis outbreak in the United States. Epidemiologic evidence indicated exposures occurred at or near the mill, and genomic findings suggested a common exposure source. Patients with diabetes may have increased risk for hospitalization, and elevated urine antigen titers could indicate greater disease severity. Early suspicion of blastomycosis may prompt earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and improving patient outcomes.
背景 浆霉菌病是一种环境获得性真菌感染,可导致严重的肺部疾病和较高的住院率。方法我们纳入了自 2022 年 9 月 1 日以来在德尔塔县逗留时间≥40 小时且于 2022 年 12 月 1 日至 2023 年 7 月 1 日发病的临床和实验室证据显示患有布氏杆菌病的患者。我们评估了患者的流行病学和临床特征,并评估了与住院治疗相关的因素。我们对 8 名患者的临床分离株进行了全基因组测序,以确定其遗传相关性。16名患者(12%)住院治疗,其中一人死亡。与非住院患者相比,更多住院患者患有糖尿病(p=0.03),尿液抗原滴度超过定量下限(p<0.001)。住院患者也更有可能在接受囊霉菌病诊断检测前就诊≥1次(P=0.02),并在开具抗真菌处方前接受过抗生素治疗(P=0.001)。所有测序分离物均被鉴定为吉尔吉斯布氏杆菌,并聚集成一个独特的疫情群。流行病学证据表明,暴露发生在工厂或工厂附近,基因组研究结果表明存在共同的暴露源。糖尿病患者住院的风险可能会增加,尿液抗原滴度升高可能预示着病情更加严重。对囊霉菌病的早期怀疑可促使早期诊断和治疗,从而减少不必要的抗生素处方并改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Epidemiological and clinical features of a large blastomycosis outbreak at a paper mill in Michigan.","authors":"Ian Hennessee,Sara Palmer,Rebecca Reik,Arianna Miles-Jay,Muhammad Yasir Nawaz,Heather M Blankenship,Rebecca Kramer,Adam Hughes,Michael Snyder,Robert L Yin,Anastasia P Litvintseva,Lindsay A Parnell,Lalitha Gade,Tom Chiller,Marie A de Perio,Mary Grace Stobierski,Jevon McFadden,Mitsuru Toda,","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae513","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDBlastomycosis is an environmentally acquired fungal infection that can result in severe pulmonary illness and high hospitalization rates. In 2023, a blastomycosis outbreak was detected among workers at a paper mill in Delta County, Michigan.METHODSWe included patients with clinical and laboratory evidence of blastomycosis who had spent ≥40 hours in Delta County since September 1, 2022 and had illness onset December 1, 2022-July 1, 2023. We assessed epidemiological and clinical features of patients and evaluated factors associated with hospitalization. We performed whole-genome sequencing to characterize genetic relatedness of clinical isolates from eight patients.RESULTSIn total, 131 patients were identified; all had worked at or visited the mill. Sixteen patients (12%) were hospitalized; one died. Compared with non-hospitalized patients, more hospitalized patients had diabetes (p=0.03) and urine antigen titers above the lower limit of quantification (p<0.001). Hospitalized patients were also more likely to have had ≥1 healthcare visits before receiving a blastomycosis diagnostic test (p=0.02) and to have been treated with antibiotics prior to antifungal prescription (p=0.001). All sequenced isolates were identified as Blastomyces gilchristii and clustered into a distinct outbreak cluster.CONCLUSIONSThis was the largest documented blastomycosis outbreak in the United States. Epidemiologic evidence indicated exposures occurred at or near the mill, and genomic findings suggested a common exposure source. Patients with diabetes may have increased risk for hospitalization, and elevated urine antigen titers could indicate greater disease severity. Early suspicion of blastomycosis may prompt earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and improving patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142449268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of vulnerable patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir: a retrospective comparative effectiveness study of mortality in US hospitals 使用雷米地韦对因 COVID-19 住院的易感患者进行管理:美国医院死亡率回顾性比较效果研究
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae512
Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Mark Berry, Paul E Sax, Paul Loubet, Yohei Doi, Alpesh N Amin, Neera Ahuja, Veronika Müller, Roman Casciano, Martin Kolditz
Background COVID-19 remains a major public health concern, with continued resurgences of cases and substantial risk of mortality for hospitalized patients. Remdesivir has become standard-of-care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Given the continued evolution of the disease, clinical management relies on evidence from the current endemic period. Methods Using the PINC AI Healthcare database, effectiveness of remdesivir was evaluated among adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Three cohorts were analysed: adults, elderly (≥65 years), and those with documented COVID-19 pneumonia. Analyses were stratified by oxygen requirements. Patients receiving remdesivir were matched to those not receiving remdesivir using propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine in-hospital mortality. Results 169,965 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 were included, of which 94,129 (55.4%) initiated remdesivir in the first two days of hospitalization. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate as compared to no remdesivir among patients with no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc) (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.75 [0.69-0.82]; 28-day, 0.77 [0.72-0.83]) and among those with supplemental oxygen charges (SOc): 14-day, 0.76 [0.72-0.81]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.74-0.83]) (p&lt;0.0001, for all). Similar findings were observed for elderly patients and those hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusions This evidence builds on learnings from randomized controlled trials from the pandemic era to inform clinical practices. Remdesivir was associated with significant reduction in mortality for hospitalized patients including the elderly and those with COVID-19 pneumonia.
背景 COVID-19 仍是一个重大的公共卫生问题,病例持续复发,住院患者有很大的死亡风险。雷米地韦已成为 COVID-19 住院患者的标准治疗方案。鉴于该疾病的持续发展,临床管理需要依靠当前流行期的证据。方法 利用 PINC AI Healthcare 数据库,评估了 2021 年 12 月至 2024 年 2 月期间初诊为 COVID-19 的住院成人使用雷米替韦的效果。分析了三个组群:成人、老年人(≥65 岁)和有记录的 COVID-19 肺炎患者。分析按氧气需求进行分层。使用倾向得分匹配法将接受雷米替韦治疗的患者与未接受雷米替韦治疗的患者进行配对。采用 Cox 比例危险度模型检测院内死亡率。结果 纳入了 169,965 名因 COVID-19 住院的成人,其中 94,129 人(55.4%)在住院头两天开始使用雷米替韦。与未使用雷米替韦相比,未使用补充氧气(NSOc)的患者死亡率明显降低(aHR [95% CI]:14 天,0.75 [0.69-0.82];28 天,0.77 [0.72-0.83]),使用补充氧气(SOc)的患者死亡率也明显降低(aHR [95% CI]:14 天,0.76 [0.72-0.83];28 天,0.77 [0.72-0.83]):14天,0.76 [0.72-0.81];28天,0.79 [0.74-0.83])(均为 p&lt;0.0001)。老年患者和因 COVID-19 肺炎住院的患者也观察到了类似的结果。结论 这些证据借鉴了大流行时期随机对照试验的经验,为临床实践提供了参考。雷米地韦能显著降低住院患者(包括老年人和 COVID-19 肺炎患者)的死亡率。
{"title":"Management of vulnerable patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir: a retrospective comparative effectiveness study of mortality in US hospitals","authors":"Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Mark Berry, Paul E Sax, Paul Loubet, Yohei Doi, Alpesh N Amin, Neera Ahuja, Veronika Müller, Roman Casciano, Martin Kolditz","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae512","url":null,"abstract":"Background COVID-19 remains a major public health concern, with continued resurgences of cases and substantial risk of mortality for hospitalized patients. Remdesivir has become standard-of-care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Given the continued evolution of the disease, clinical management relies on evidence from the current endemic period. Methods Using the PINC AI Healthcare database, effectiveness of remdesivir was evaluated among adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Three cohorts were analysed: adults, elderly (≥65 years), and those with documented COVID-19 pneumonia. Analyses were stratified by oxygen requirements. Patients receiving remdesivir were matched to those not receiving remdesivir using propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine in-hospital mortality. Results 169,965 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 were included, of which 94,129 (55.4%) initiated remdesivir in the first two days of hospitalization. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate as compared to no remdesivir among patients with no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc) (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.75 [0.69-0.82]; 28-day, 0.77 [0.72-0.83]) and among those with supplemental oxygen charges (SOc): 14-day, 0.76 [0.72-0.81]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.74-0.83]) (p&amp;lt;0.0001, for all). Similar findings were observed for elderly patients and those hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusions This evidence builds on learnings from randomized controlled trials from the pandemic era to inform clinical practices. Remdesivir was associated with significant reduction in mortality for hospitalized patients including the elderly and those with COVID-19 pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142449571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Propensity score methods for confounding control in observational studies of therapeutics for COVID-19 infection 用于控制 COVID-19 感染疗法观察研究中混杂因素的倾向得分法
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae516
Kathleen E Hurwitz, Nuvan Rathnayaka, Kayla Hendrickson, M Alan Brookhart
Summary The authors provide a brief overview of different propensity score methods that can be used in observational research studies that lack randomization. Under specific assumptions, these methods result in unbiased estimates of causal effects, but the different ways propensity score are used may require different assumptions and result in estimated treatment effects that can have meaningfully different interpretations. The authors review these issues and consider their implications for studies of therapeutics for COVID-19.
摘要 作者简要概述了可用于缺乏随机化的观察性研究的不同倾向得分方法。在特定的假设条件下,这些方法可以得出无偏的因果效应估计值,但倾向得分的不同使用方法可能需要不同的假设条件,并导致估计的治疗效应可能会产生有意义的不同解释。作者回顾了这些问题,并考虑了它们对 COVID-19 疗法研究的影响。
{"title":"Propensity score methods for confounding control in observational studies of therapeutics for COVID-19 infection","authors":"Kathleen E Hurwitz, Nuvan Rathnayaka, Kayla Hendrickson, M Alan Brookhart","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae516","url":null,"abstract":"Summary The authors provide a brief overview of different propensity score methods that can be used in observational research studies that lack randomization. Under specific assumptions, these methods result in unbiased estimates of causal effects, but the different ways propensity score are used may require different assumptions and result in estimated treatment effects that can have meaningfully different interpretations. The authors review these issues and consider their implications for studies of therapeutics for COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142444285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of VIR-2482 in Healthy Adults for Prevention of Influenza A Illness (PENINSULA). 评估 VIR-2482 在健康成人中预防甲型流感的安全性和有效性的随机安慰剂对照试验 (PENINSULA)。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae368
Susanna K Tan, Deborah Cebrik, David Plotnik, Maria L Agostini, Keith Boundy, Christy M Hebner, Wendy W Yeh, Phillip S Pang, Jaynier Moya, Charles Fogarty, Manuchehr Darani, Frederick G Hayden

Background: Influenza A results in significant morbidity and mortality. VIR-2482, an engineered human monoclonal antibody with extended half-life, targets a highly conserved epitope on the stem region of influenza A hemagglutinin and may protect against seasonal and pandemic influenza.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study examined the safety and efficacy of VIR-2482 for seasonal influenza A illness prevention in unvaccinated healthy adults. Participants (N = 2977) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive VIR-2482 450 mg, VIR-2482 1200 mg, or placebo via intramuscular injection. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of participants with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza A infection and either protocol-defined influenza-like illness (ILI) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined ILI or World Health Organization-defined ILI, respectively.

Results: VIR-2482 450 mg and 1200 mg prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of protocol-defined ILI with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza A versus placebo (relative risk reduction, 3.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), -67.3 to 44.6] and 15.9% [95% CI, -49.3 to 52.3], respectively). At the 1200-mg dose, the relative risk reductions in influenza A illness were 57.2% (95% CI: -2.5 to 82.2) using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ILI and 44.1% (95% CI: -50.5 to 79.3) using World Health Organization ILI definitions, respectively. Serum VIR-2482 levels were similar regardless of influenza status; variants with reduced VIR-2482 susceptibility were not detected. Local injection site reactions were mild and similar across groups.

Conclusions: VIR-2482 1200 mg intramuscular was well tolerated but did not significantly prevent protocol-defined ILI. Secondary endpoint analyses suggest this dose may have reduced influenza A illness. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05567783.

背景:甲型流感导致严重的发病率和死亡率。VIR-2482是一种具有延长半衰期的工程化人类单克隆抗体,以甲型流感血凝素茎区的高度保守表位为靶点,可预防季节性流感和大流行性流感:这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的 2 期研究考察了 VIR-2482 对未接种疫苗的健康成年人预防季节性甲型流感的安全性和有效性。参与者(N = 2977)按 1:1:1 的比例随机接受 VIR-2482 450 毫克、VIR-2482 1200 毫克或安慰剂肌肉注射。主要和次要疗效终点分别为经逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)证实的甲型流感感染者比例,以及方案定义的流感样病症(ILI)和美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)定义的ILI或世界卫生组织(WHO)定义的ILI:与安慰剂相比,450毫克和1200毫克VIR-2482预防剂并未降低RT-PCR确诊甲型流感协议定义的ILI风险(相对风险降低率[RRR]分别为3.8%[95% CI:-67.3,44.6]和15.9%[95% CI:-49.3,52.3])。根据 CDC-ILI 和 WHO-ILI 的定义,1200 毫克剂量的甲型流感发病率分别为 57.2% [95% CI:-2.5, 82.2]和 44.1% [95% CI:-50.5, 79.3]。无论流感状况如何,血清 VIR-2482 水平相似;未检测到对 VIR-2482 敏感性降低的变种。各组的局部注射部位反应轻微且相似:结论:VIR-2482 1200 毫克 IM 的耐受性良好,但不能显著预防方案定义的 ILI。次要终点分析表明,该剂量可能会减少甲型流感的发病率。
{"title":"A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of VIR-2482 in Healthy Adults for Prevention of Influenza A Illness (PENINSULA).","authors":"Susanna K Tan, Deborah Cebrik, David Plotnik, Maria L Agostini, Keith Boundy, Christy M Hebner, Wendy W Yeh, Phillip S Pang, Jaynier Moya, Charles Fogarty, Manuchehr Darani, Frederick G Hayden","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae368","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza A results in significant morbidity and mortality. VIR-2482, an engineered human monoclonal antibody with extended half-life, targets a highly conserved epitope on the stem region of influenza A hemagglutinin and may protect against seasonal and pandemic influenza.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study examined the safety and efficacy of VIR-2482 for seasonal influenza A illness prevention in unvaccinated healthy adults. Participants (N = 2977) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive VIR-2482 450 mg, VIR-2482 1200 mg, or placebo via intramuscular injection. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of participants with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza A infection and either protocol-defined influenza-like illness (ILI) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined ILI or World Health Organization-defined ILI, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VIR-2482 450 mg and 1200 mg prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of protocol-defined ILI with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza A versus placebo (relative risk reduction, 3.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), -67.3 to 44.6] and 15.9% [95% CI, -49.3 to 52.3], respectively). At the 1200-mg dose, the relative risk reductions in influenza A illness were 57.2% (95% CI: -2.5 to 82.2) using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ILI and 44.1% (95% CI: -50.5 to 79.3) using World Health Organization ILI definitions, respectively. Serum VIR-2482 levels were similar regardless of influenza status; variants with reduced VIR-2482 susceptibility were not detected. Local injection site reactions were mild and similar across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VIR-2482 1200 mg intramuscular was well tolerated but did not significantly prevent protocol-defined ILI. Secondary endpoint analyses suggest this dose may have reduced influenza A illness. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05567783.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1054-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478579/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141733655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1