Misleading data visualizations are increasingly prevalent in digital learning environments, posing significant challenges to learners' ability to accurately interpret quantitative information. While prior research has examined individual types of misleading visual features, few studies have systematically compared their relative impacts on learner comprehension or explored how data literacy moderates these effects. This study addresses these gaps by empirically evaluating the deceptive potential of 14 types of misleading data visualizations and examining how learners’ data literacy influences interpretation accuracy. Using a within-subjects experimental design, 68 undergraduate students interpreted both misleading and non-misleading versions of various charts. Results revealed that certain misleading features, particularly axis-related distortions such as inverted y-axes, irregular x-axis intervals, and dual axes, significantly reduced interpretation accuracy. Although higher data literacy improved performance, some misleading features continued to impair comprehension even among visually literate learners. These findings highlight the need for instructional interventions and learning technologies that explicitly address visual misinformation. We discuss implications for data literacy education, learning design, and the development of educational tools that support critical interpretation of data visualizations.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
