Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Clément Benoist, Alexandre Destere, Marc Labriffe, Giulia Marchello, Julie Josse, Pierre Marquet
The use of synthetic data in pharmacology research has gained significant attention due to its potential to address privacy concerns and promote open science. In this study, we implemented and compared three synthetic data generation methods, CT-GAN, TVAE, and a simplified implementation of Avatar, for a previously published pharmacogenetic dataset of 253 patients with one measurement per patient (non-longitudinal). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these methods in terms of data utility and privacy trade off. Our results showed that CT-GAN and Avatar used with k = 10 (number of patients used to create the local model of generation) had the best overall performance in terms of data utility and privacy preservation. However, the TVAE method showed a relatively lower level of performance in these aspects. In terms of Hazard ratio estimation, Avatar with k = 10 produced HR estimates closest to the original data, whereas CT-GAN slightly underestimated the HR and TVAE showed the most significant deviation from the original HR. We also investigated the effect of applying the algorithms multiple times to improve results stability in terms of HR estimation. Our findings suggested that this approach could be beneficial, especially in the case of small datasets, to achieve more reliable and robust results. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the performance of CT-GAN, TVAE, and Avatar methods for synthetic data generation in pharmacogenetic research. The application to other type of data and analyses (data driven) used in pharmacology should be further investigated.
{"title":"To be or not to be, when synthetic data meet clinical pharmacology: A focused study on pharmacogenetics","authors":"Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Clément Benoist, Alexandre Destere, Marc Labriffe, Giulia Marchello, Julie Josse, Pierre Marquet","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13240","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13240","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of synthetic data in pharmacology research has gained significant attention due to its potential to address privacy concerns and promote open science. In this study, we implemented and compared three synthetic data generation methods, CT-GAN, TVAE, and a simplified implementation of Avatar, for a previously published pharmacogenetic dataset of 253 patients with one measurement per patient (non-longitudinal). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these methods in terms of data utility and privacy trade off. Our results showed that CT-GAN and Avatar used with <i>k</i> = 10 (number of patients used to create the local model of generation) had the best overall performance in terms of data utility and privacy preservation. However, the TVAE method showed a relatively lower level of performance in these aspects. In terms of Hazard ratio estimation, Avatar with <i>k</i> = 10 produced HR estimates closest to the original data, whereas CT-GAN slightly underestimated the HR and TVAE showed the most significant deviation from the original HR. We also investigated the effect of applying the algorithms multiple times to improve results stability in terms of HR estimation. Our findings suggested that this approach could be beneficial, especially in the case of small datasets, to achieve more reliable and robust results. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the performance of CT-GAN, TVAE, and Avatar methods for synthetic data generation in pharmacogenetic research. The application to other type of data and analyses (data driven) used in pharmacology should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 1","pages":"82-94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706419/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kylie A. Beattie, Meghna Verma, Richard J. Brennan, Diana Clausznitzer, Valeriu Damian, Derek Leishman, Mary E. Spilker, Britton Boras, Zhenhong Li, Elias Oziolor, Theodore R. Rieger, Anna Sher
Quantitative systems toxicology (QST) models are increasingly being applied for predicting and understanding toxicity liabilities in pharmaceutical research and development. A European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)-wide survey was completed by 15 companies. The results provide insights into the current use of QST models across the industry. 73% of responding companies with more than 10,000 employees utilize QST models. The most applied QST models are for liver, cardiac electrophysiology, and bone marrow/hematology. Responders indicated particular interest in QST models for the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, lung, and skin. QST models are used to support decisions in both preclinical and clinical stages of pharmaceutical development. The survey suggests high demand for QST models and resource limitations were indicated as a common obstacle to broader use and impact. Increased investment in QST resources and training may accelerate application and impact. Case studies of QST model use in decision-making within EFPIA companies are also discussed. This article aims to (i) share industry experience and learnings from applying QST models to inform decision-making in drug discovery and development programs, and (ii) share approaches taken during QST model development and validation and compare these with recommendations for modeling best practices and frameworks proposed in the literature. Discussion of QST-specific applications in relation to these modeling frameworks is relevant in the context of the recently proposed International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M15 guideline on general principles for Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD).
{"title":"Quantitative systems toxicology modeling in pharmaceutical research and development: An industry-wide survey and selected case study examples","authors":"Kylie A. Beattie, Meghna Verma, Richard J. Brennan, Diana Clausznitzer, Valeriu Damian, Derek Leishman, Mary E. Spilker, Britton Boras, Zhenhong Li, Elias Oziolor, Theodore R. Rieger, Anna Sher","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13227","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13227","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantitative systems toxicology (QST) models are increasingly being applied for predicting and understanding toxicity liabilities in pharmaceutical research and development. A European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)-wide survey was completed by 15 companies. The results provide insights into the current use of QST models across the industry. 73% of responding companies with more than 10,000 employees utilize QST models. The most applied QST models are for liver, cardiac electrophysiology, and bone marrow/hematology. Responders indicated particular interest in QST models for the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, lung, and skin. QST models are used to support decisions in both preclinical and clinical stages of pharmaceutical development. The survey suggests high demand for QST models and resource limitations were indicated as a common obstacle to broader use and impact. Increased investment in QST resources and training may accelerate application and impact. Case studies of QST model use in decision-making within EFPIA companies are also discussed. This article aims to (i) share industry experience and learnings from applying QST models to inform decision-making in drug discovery and development programs, and (ii) share approaches taken during QST model development and validation and compare these with recommendations for modeling best practices and frameworks proposed in the literature. Discussion of QST-specific applications in relation to these modeling frameworks is relevant in the context of the recently proposed International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M15 guideline on general principles for Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD).</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"13 12","pages":"2036-2051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13227","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Empirical maturation models (e.g., Johnson and Rhodin models) for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are commonly used as scaling factors for predicting pediatric renal clearance, but their predictive performance for drugs featured with tubular reabsorption is poorly understood. This study investigated the adequacy of GFR-based scaling models for predicting pediatric renal clearance in drugs with passive tubular reabsorption by comparing with a mechanistic kidney model (Mech-KiM) that encompasses the physiological processes of glomerular filtration, tubular secretion, and reabsorption. The analysis utilized hypothetical drugs with varying fractions of tubular reabsorption (Freabs), alongside the model drug metronidazole, which has a Freabs of 96%. Our simulations showed that when Freabs is ≤70%, the discrepancies between the GFR-based scaling methods and the Mech-KiM model in predicting pediatric renal clearance were generally within a twofold range throughout childhood. However, for drugs with substantial tubular reabsorption (e.g., Freabs > 70%), discrepancies greater than twofold were observed between the GFR-based scaling methods and the Mech-KiM model in predicting renal clearance for young children. In neonates, the differences ranged from 5- to 10-fold when the adult Freabs was 95%. Pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of metronidazole revealed that using a GFR-based scaling method (Johnson model) significantly overestimated drug concentrations in children under 2 months, whereas utilizing the Mech-KiM model for renal clearance predictions yielded estimates closely aligned with observed concentrations. Our study demonstrates that using GFR-based scaling models to predict pediatric renal clearance might be inadequate for drugs with extensive passive tubular reabsorption (e.g., Freabs > 70%).
肾小球滤过率(GFR)的经验成熟模型(如约翰逊模型和罗丹模型)通常用作预测小儿肾脏清除率的比例因子,但它们对以肾小管重吸收为特征的药物的预测性能却知之甚少。本研究通过与包含肾小球滤过、肾小管分泌和重吸收生理过程的机理肾脏模型(Mech-KiM)进行比较,研究了基于 GFR 的比例模型是否足以预测具有被动肾小管重吸收功能的药物的小儿肾脏清除率。分析利用了肾小管重吸收比例(Freabs)不同的假定药物,以及 Freabs 为 96% 的模型药物甲硝唑。我们的模拟结果表明,当 Freabs≤70% 时,基于 GFR 的缩放方法和 Mech-KiM 模型在预测小儿肾脏清除率方面的差异在整个儿童期一般在 2 倍范围内。然而,对于具有大量肾小管重吸收功能的药物(如 Freabs > 70%),基于 GFR 的缩放方法和 Mech-KiM 模型在预测幼儿肾清除率方面的差异超过 2 倍。在新生儿中,当成人 Freabs 为 95% 时,差异从 5 倍到 10 倍不等。对甲硝唑的儿科生理药代动力学(PBPK)建模显示,使用基于 GFR 的缩放方法(Johnson 模型)会明显高估 2 个月以下儿童的药物浓度,而使用 Mech-KiM 模型预测肾清除率的结果与观察到的浓度非常接近。我们的研究表明,使用基于 GFR 的比例模型来预测儿科肾脏清除率,可能不足以预测具有广泛被动肾小管重吸收作用(如 Freabs > 70%)的药物。
{"title":"Is the GFR-based scaling approach adequate for predicting pediatric renal clearance of drugs with passive tubular reabsorption? Insights from PBPK modeling","authors":"Sanwang Li, Xuexin Ye, Qiushi Wang, Zeneng Cheng, Feiyan Liu, Feifan Xie","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13254","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13254","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Empirical maturation models (e.g., Johnson and Rhodin models) for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are commonly used as scaling factors for predicting pediatric renal clearance, but their predictive performance for drugs featured with tubular reabsorption is poorly understood. This study investigated the adequacy of GFR-based scaling models for predicting pediatric renal clearance in drugs with passive tubular reabsorption by comparing with a mechanistic kidney model (Mech-KiM) that encompasses the physiological processes of glomerular filtration, tubular secretion, and reabsorption. The analysis utilized hypothetical drugs with varying fractions of tubular reabsorption (<i>F</i><sub>reabs</sub>), alongside the model drug metronidazole, which has a <i>F</i><sub>reabs</sub> of 96%. Our simulations showed that when <i>F</i><sub>reabs</sub> is ≤70%, the discrepancies between the GFR-based scaling methods and the Mech-KiM model in predicting pediatric renal clearance were generally within a twofold range throughout childhood. However, for drugs with substantial tubular reabsorption (e.g., <i>F</i><sub>reabs</sub> > 70%), discrepancies greater than twofold were observed between the GFR-based scaling methods and the Mech-KiM model in predicting renal clearance for young children. In neonates, the differences ranged from 5- to 10-fold when the adult <i>F</i><sub>reabs</sub> was 95%. Pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of metronidazole revealed that using a GFR-based scaling method (Johnson model) significantly overestimated drug concentrations in children under 2 months, whereas utilizing the Mech-KiM model for renal clearance predictions yielded estimates closely aligned with observed concentrations. Our study demonstrates that using GFR-based scaling models to predict pediatric renal clearance might be inadequate for drugs with extensive passive tubular reabsorption (e.g., <i>F</i><sub>reabs</sub> > 70%).</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 1","pages":"152-163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706418/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paola Coppola, Eva Gil Berglund, Karen Rowland Yeo
<p>Drug treatment may be required during pregnancy, both for pregnant women and their unborn children. About 6 million pregnancies in the United States (US) occur each year, with most women taking at least one prescription medication during pregnancy and more than half of the mothers taking medicines after delivery (Pregnant?_Breastfeeding?_FDA_Aims_to_Improve_Drug_Information_[fda.gov]). However, in our attempts to protect the unborn children or breastfeeding infants, information to support such treatment is rarely generated and drugs are often used off-label.</p><p>Systematic exclusion of pregnant women from clinical trials at all stages does not allow the collection of data to support the safe use of medicines during pregnancy. Dosing strategies to treat health conditions developed either before or during pregnancy often rely on data from healthy and/or nonpregnant subjects, instead of being driven by complex pregnancy-related physiological changes on drug exposure. Despite the recognized medical need, a recent review captured labels with clinically meaningful interventions in pregnancy for only 139 medications in the US and 20 in the European Union (EU); in both cases, 30%–40% had established doses for pregnant populations.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Information on dosing during pregnancy is often unavailable in original regulatory submissions limiting label recommendation. Pre-authorization data in pregnant population is generally not requested and post-authorization registry studies are mainly required for drugs where substantial use during pregnancy is foreseen, for example, in malaria or for HIV treatment, monitoring pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to drugs during gestation (Postmarket_Requirements_and_Commitments_[fda.gov]). In addition to data collection in registries, when pregnancy is expected to impact systemic drug levels, clinical PK data are generated post-authorization to inform dosing recommendations (e.g., rilpivirine, darunavir, cobicistat).</p><p>For years, the clinical need for drug treatment during pregnancy has been left largely unresolved by regulators and sponsors, leaving the risk–benefit assessment to prescribers and patients. However, health care and community attention to this unmet medical need has resulted in increased regulatory action. In 2018, the FDA published a draft guidance on Scientific and Ethical Considerations for the Inclusion of pregnant women in Clinical Trials. In 2022, current thinking and regulatory efforts were communicated by Sewell et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> and the FDA diversity plan framework (Diversity_Plans_to_Improve_Enrollment_of_Participants_from_Underrepresented_Racial_and_Ethnic_Populations_in_Clinical_Trials_Guidance_for_Industry_(fda.gov)). Furthermore, regulators from the FDA, EMA, and MHRA acknowledged the urgent need to shift from systematic exclusion to the inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in clinical trials at the International Coalition of Medicines Regulator
{"title":"Medicines in pregnancy: A clinical pharmacology extrapolation framework to address knowledge gaps","authors":"Paola Coppola, Eva Gil Berglund, Karen Rowland Yeo","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13242","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13242","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drug treatment may be required during pregnancy, both for pregnant women and their unborn children. About 6 million pregnancies in the United States (US) occur each year, with most women taking at least one prescription medication during pregnancy and more than half of the mothers taking medicines after delivery (Pregnant?_Breastfeeding?_FDA_Aims_to_Improve_Drug_Information_[fda.gov]). However, in our attempts to protect the unborn children or breastfeeding infants, information to support such treatment is rarely generated and drugs are often used off-label.</p><p>Systematic exclusion of pregnant women from clinical trials at all stages does not allow the collection of data to support the safe use of medicines during pregnancy. Dosing strategies to treat health conditions developed either before or during pregnancy often rely on data from healthy and/or nonpregnant subjects, instead of being driven by complex pregnancy-related physiological changes on drug exposure. Despite the recognized medical need, a recent review captured labels with clinically meaningful interventions in pregnancy for only 139 medications in the US and 20 in the European Union (EU); in both cases, 30%–40% had established doses for pregnant populations.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Information on dosing during pregnancy is often unavailable in original regulatory submissions limiting label recommendation. Pre-authorization data in pregnant population is generally not requested and post-authorization registry studies are mainly required for drugs where substantial use during pregnancy is foreseen, for example, in malaria or for HIV treatment, monitoring pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to drugs during gestation (Postmarket_Requirements_and_Commitments_[fda.gov]). In addition to data collection in registries, when pregnancy is expected to impact systemic drug levels, clinical PK data are generated post-authorization to inform dosing recommendations (e.g., rilpivirine, darunavir, cobicistat).</p><p>For years, the clinical need for drug treatment during pregnancy has been left largely unresolved by regulators and sponsors, leaving the risk–benefit assessment to prescribers and patients. However, health care and community attention to this unmet medical need has resulted in increased regulatory action. In 2018, the FDA published a draft guidance on Scientific and Ethical Considerations for the Inclusion of pregnant women in Clinical Trials. In 2022, current thinking and regulatory efforts were communicated by Sewell et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> and the FDA diversity plan framework (Diversity_Plans_to_Improve_Enrollment_of_Participants_from_Underrepresented_Racial_and_Ethnic_Populations_in_Clinical_Trials_Guidance_for_Industry_(fda.gov)). Furthermore, regulators from the FDA, EMA, and MHRA acknowledged the urgent need to shift from systematic exclusion to the inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in clinical trials at the International Coalition of Medicines Regulator","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"13 11","pages":"1830-1834"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13242","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Babajide Shenkoya, Mathangi Gopalakrishnan, Ahizechukwu C. Eke
Opioid use disorders (OUD) are a major issue in the U.S. Current treatments for pregnant women, like methadone and buprenorphine require daily dosing and have adverse effects. Monthly injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) mitigates these adverse effects but is not recommended during pregnancy due to limited pharmacokinetic and safety data. This study developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to describe XR-NTX pharmacokinetics during pregnancy, and to predict dosing recommendations. Model predictions were successfully validated with observed data. Maternal plasma XR-NTX profiles were simulated for 400 non-pregnant virtual females at the approved dose of 380 mg, then randomized to continue with either 380, 285, 190, or 95 mg during pregnancy. The non-pregnant virtual females had a mean predicted Cmax, AUC0-7days, and AUC0-28days of 23.3 ng/mL, 142 ng·d/mL, and 148 ng·d/mL, respectively. Maternal XR-NTX exposure (AUC0-28days) were predicted to increase by 1.37, 1.43, and 1.72 times during the first, second, and third trimester of pregnancy. However, the fetal-to-maternal exposure (AUC0-28days) was lower in the first (15%), second (7%), and third (9%) trimesters. A dose of 285 mg of XR-NTX in pregnancy during the first/second trimester and dose of 190 mg in the third trimester were predicted to provide maternal exposures that were comparable to non-pregnant levels at the standard dose. This study provides crucial insights into XR-NTX pharmacokinetics and proposes a dosing strategy during pregnancy, potentially aiding further clinical investigations and decision making regarding XR-NTX use during pregnancy.
{"title":"Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of long-acting extended-release naltrexone in pregnant women with opioid use disorder","authors":"Babajide Shenkoya, Mathangi Gopalakrishnan, Ahizechukwu C. Eke","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13252","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13252","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Opioid use disorders (OUD) are a major issue in the U.S. Current treatments for pregnant women, like methadone and buprenorphine require daily dosing and have adverse effects. Monthly injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) mitigates these adverse effects but is not recommended during pregnancy due to limited pharmacokinetic and safety data. This study developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to describe XR-NTX pharmacokinetics during pregnancy, and to predict dosing recommendations. Model predictions were successfully validated with observed data. Maternal plasma XR-NTX profiles were simulated for 400 non-pregnant virtual females at the approved dose of 380 mg, then randomized to continue with either 380, 285, 190, or 95 mg during pregnancy. The non-pregnant virtual females had a mean predicted <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-7days</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-28days</sub> of 23.3 ng/mL, 142 ng·d/mL, and 148 ng·d/mL, respectively. Maternal XR-NTX exposure (AUC<sub>0-28days</sub>) were predicted to increase by 1.37, 1.43, and 1.72 times during the first, second, and third trimester of pregnancy. However, the fetal-to-maternal exposure (AUC<sub>0-28days</sub>) was lower in the first (15%), second (7%), and third (9%) trimesters. A dose of 285 mg of XR-NTX in pregnancy during the first/second trimester and dose of 190 mg in the third trimester were predicted to provide maternal exposures that were comparable to non-pregnant levels at the standard dose. This study provides crucial insights into XR-NTX pharmacokinetics and proposes a dosing strategy during pregnancy, potentially aiding further clinical investigations and decision making regarding XR-NTX use during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"13 11","pages":"1939-1952"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13252","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rory Leisegang, Hanna E. Silber Baumann, Siân Lennon-Chrimes, Hajime Ito, Kazuhiro Miya, Jean-Christophe Genin, Elodie L. Plan
Immunogenicity is the propensity of a therapeutic protein to generate an immune response to itself. While reporting of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is increasing, model-based analysis of such data is seldom performed. Model-based characterization of factors affecting the emergence and dissipation of ADAs may inform drug development and/or improve understanding in clinical practice. This analysis aimed to predict ADA dynamics, including the potential influence of individual covariates, following subcutaneous satralizumab administration. Satralizumab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal recycling IL-6 receptor antagonist antibody approved for treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Longitudinal pharmacokinetic (PK) and ADA data from 154 NMOSD patients in two pivotal Phase 3 studies (NCT02028884, NCT02073279) and PK data from one Phase 1 study (SA-001JP) in 72 healthy volunteers were available for this analysis. An existing population PK model was adapted to derive steady-state concentration without ADA for each patient. A mixed hidden Markov model (mHMM) was developed whereby three different states were identified: one absorbing Markov state for non-ADA developer, and two dynamic and inter-connected Markov states—transient ADA negative and positive. Satralizumab exposure and body mass index impacted transition probabilities and, therefore, the likelihood of developing ADAs. In conclusion, the mHMM model was able to describe the time course of ADA development and identify patterns of ADA development in NMOSD patients following treatment with satralizumab, which may allow for the formulation of strategies to reduce the emergence or limit the impact of ADA in the clinical setting.
免疫原性是指治疗性蛋白质对自身产生免疫反应的倾向。虽然有关抗药抗体(ADA)的报告越来越多,但很少对这些数据进行基于模型的分析。对影响 ADA 出现和消散的因素进行基于模型的特征描述可为药物开发提供信息和/或改善临床实践中的理解。本分析旨在预测皮下注射萨妥珠单抗后的 ADA 动态,包括单个协变量的潜在影响。Satralizumab是一种人源化IgG2单克隆回收IL-6受体拮抗剂抗体,已被批准用于治疗神经脊髓炎视频谱障碍(NMOSD)。本次分析获得了两项关键性 3 期研究(NCT02028884、NCT02073279)中 154 名 NMOSD 患者的纵向药代动力学(PK)和 ADA 数据,以及一项 1 期研究(SA-001JP)中 72 名健康志愿者的 PK 数据。对现有的群体 PK 模型进行了调整,以得出每位患者不含 ADA 的稳态浓度。我们建立了一个混合隐马尔可夫模型(mHMM),并据此确定了三种不同的状态:一种是非 ADA 显影剂的吸收马尔可夫状态,另一种是两个动态且相互关联的马尔可夫状态--瞬时 ADA 阴性和阳性。萨妥珠单抗暴露和体重指数会影响过渡概率,从而影响出现 ADA 的可能性。总之,mHMM 模型能够描述 NMOSD 患者在使用沙妥珠单抗治疗后出现 ADA 的时间过程,并确定 ADA 的发展模式,这有助于制定策略以减少 ADA 的出现或限制 ADA 在临床环境中的影响。
{"title":"Immunogenicity dynamics and covariate effects after satralizumab administration predicted with a hidden Markov model","authors":"Rory Leisegang, Hanna E. Silber Baumann, Siân Lennon-Chrimes, Hajime Ito, Kazuhiro Miya, Jean-Christophe Genin, Elodie L. Plan","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13230","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13230","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Immunogenicity is the propensity of a therapeutic protein to generate an immune response to itself. While reporting of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is increasing, model-based analysis of such data is seldom performed. Model-based characterization of factors affecting the emergence and dissipation of ADAs may inform drug development and/or improve understanding in clinical practice. This analysis aimed to predict ADA dynamics, including the potential influence of individual covariates, following subcutaneous satralizumab administration. Satralizumab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal recycling IL-6 receptor antagonist antibody approved for treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Longitudinal pharmacokinetic (PK) and ADA data from 154 NMOSD patients in two pivotal Phase 3 studies (NCT02028884, NCT02073279) and PK data from one Phase 1 study (SA-001JP) in 72 healthy volunteers were available for this analysis. An existing population PK model was adapted to derive steady-state concentration without ADA for each patient. A mixed hidden Markov model (mHMM) was developed whereby three different states were identified: one absorbing Markov state for non-ADA developer, and two dynamic and inter-connected Markov states—transient ADA negative and positive. Satralizumab exposure and body mass index impacted transition probabilities and, therefore, the likelihood of developing ADAs. In conclusion, the mHMM model was able to describe the time course of ADA development and identify patterns of ADA development in NMOSD patients following treatment with satralizumab, which may allow for the formulation of strategies to reduce the emergence or limit the impact of ADA in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"13 12","pages":"2171-2184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13230","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jongjin Kim, Juan Francisco Morales, Sanghoon Kang, Marian Klose, Rebecca J Willcocks, Michael J Daniels, Ramona Belfiore-Oshan, Glenn A Walter, William D Rooney, Krista Vandenborne, Sarah Kim
Quantitative model-based clinical trial simulation tools play a critical role in informing study designs through simulation before actual execution. These tools help drug developers explore various trial scenarios in silico to select a clinical trial design to detect therapeutic effects more efficiently, therefore reducing time, expense, and participants' burden. To increase the usability of the tools, user-friendly and interactive platforms should be developed to navigate various simulation scenarios. However, developing such tools challenges researchers, requiring expertise in modeling and interface development. This tutorial aims to address this gap by guiding developers in creating tailored R Shiny apps, using an example of a model-based clinical trial simulation tool that we developed for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). In this tutorial, the structural framework, essential controllers, and visualization techniques for analysis are described, along with key code examples such as criteria selection and power calculation. A virtual population was created using a machine learning algorithm to enlarge the available sample size to simulate clinical trial scenarios in the presented tool. In addition, external validation of the simulated outputs was conducted using a placebo arm of a recently published DMD trial. This tutorial will be particularly useful for developing clinical trial simulation tools based on DMD progression models for other end points and biomarkers. The presented strategies can also be applied to other diseases.
基于定量模型的临床试验模拟工具在实际执行前通过模拟为研究设计提供信息方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这些工具可以帮助药物开发人员在硅学中探索各种试验方案,从而选择临床试验设计,更有效地检测治疗效果,从而减少时间、费用和参与者的负担。为提高工具的可用性,应开发用户友好的交互式平台,以浏览各种模拟场景。然而,开发此类工具对研究人员提出了挑战,需要建模和界面开发方面的专业知识。本教程以我们为杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)开发的基于模型的临床试验模拟工具为例,旨在指导开发人员创建量身定制的 R Shiny 应用程序,从而弥补这一不足。本教程介绍了结构框架、基本控制器和可视化分析技术,以及标准选择和功率计算等关键代码示例。使用机器学习算法创建了一个虚拟人群,以扩大可用样本量,从而在介绍的工具中模拟临床试验场景。此外,还使用最近发表的一项 DMD 试验的安慰剂臂对模拟输出进行了外部验证。本教程对于开发基于 DMD 进展模型、适用于其他终点和生物标记物的临床试验模拟工具特别有用。所介绍的策略也可应用于其他疾病。
{"title":"A model-informed clinical trial simulation tool with a graphical user interface for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.","authors":"Jongjin Kim, Juan Francisco Morales, Sanghoon Kang, Marian Klose, Rebecca J Willcocks, Michael J Daniels, Ramona Belfiore-Oshan, Glenn A Walter, William D Rooney, Krista Vandenborne, Sarah Kim","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13246","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative model-based clinical trial simulation tools play a critical role in informing study designs through simulation before actual execution. These tools help drug developers explore various trial scenarios in silico to select a clinical trial design to detect therapeutic effects more efficiently, therefore reducing time, expense, and participants' burden. To increase the usability of the tools, user-friendly and interactive platforms should be developed to navigate various simulation scenarios. However, developing such tools challenges researchers, requiring expertise in modeling and interface development. This tutorial aims to address this gap by guiding developers in creating tailored R Shiny apps, using an example of a model-based clinical trial simulation tool that we developed for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). In this tutorial, the structural framework, essential controllers, and visualization techniques for analysis are described, along with key code examples such as criteria selection and power calculation. A virtual population was created using a machine learning algorithm to enlarge the available sample size to simulate clinical trial scenarios in the presented tool. In addition, external validation of the simulated outputs was conducted using a placebo arm of a recently published DMD trial. This tutorial will be particularly useful for developing clinical trial simulation tools based on DMD progression models for other end points and biomarkers. The presented strategies can also be applied to other diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pradeep Sharma, David W. Boulton, Lynn N. Bertagnolli, Weifeng Tang
Type I interferons contribute to the pathogenesis of several autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and myositis. Anifrolumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to subunit 1 of the type I interferon receptor (IFNAR1). Results of phase IIb and phase III trials led to the approval of intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) alongside standard therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE. Here, we built a population physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of anifrolumab by utilizing the physiochemical properties of anifrolumab, binding kinetics to the Fc gamma neonatal receptor, and target-mediated drug disposition properties. A novel relative transcriptomics approach was employed to determine IFNAR1 expression in tissues (blood, skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and muscle) using mRNA abundances from bioinformatic databases. The IFNAR1 expression and PBPK model were validated by testing their ability to predict clinical pharmacokinetics over a large dose range from different clinical scenarios after subcutaneous and intravenous anifrolumab dosing. The validated PBPK model predicted high unbound local concentrations of anifrolumab in blood, skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and muscle, which exceeded its IFNAR1 dissociation equilibrium constant values. The model also predicted high IFNAR1 occupancy with subcutaneous and intravenous anifrolumab dosing. The model predicted more sustained IFNAR1 occupancy ≥90% with subcutaneous anifrolumab 120 mg once-weekly dosing vs. intravenous 300 mg Q4W dosing. The results informed the dosing of phase III studies of anifrolumab in new indications and present a novel approach to PBPK modeling coupled with relative transcriptomics in simulating pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
{"title":"Physiology-based pharmacokinetic model with relative transcriptomics to evaluate tissue distribution and receptor occupancy of anifrolumab","authors":"Pradeep Sharma, David W. Boulton, Lynn N. Bertagnolli, Weifeng Tang","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13245","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13245","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Type I interferons contribute to the pathogenesis of several autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and myositis. Anifrolumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to subunit 1 of the type I interferon receptor (IFNAR1). Results of phase IIb and phase III trials led to the approval of intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) alongside standard therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE. Here, we built a population physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of anifrolumab by utilizing the physiochemical properties of anifrolumab, binding kinetics to the Fc gamma neonatal receptor, and target-mediated drug disposition properties. A novel relative transcriptomics approach was employed to determine IFNAR1 expression in tissues (blood, skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and muscle) using mRNA abundances from bioinformatic databases. The IFNAR1 expression and PBPK model were validated by testing their ability to predict clinical pharmacokinetics over a large dose range from different clinical scenarios after subcutaneous and intravenous anifrolumab dosing. The validated PBPK model predicted high unbound local concentrations of anifrolumab in blood, skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and muscle, which exceeded its IFNAR1 dissociation equilibrium constant values. The model also predicted high IFNAR1 occupancy with subcutaneous and intravenous anifrolumab dosing. The model predicted more sustained IFNAR1 occupancy ≥90% with subcutaneous anifrolumab 120 mg once-weekly dosing vs. intravenous 300 mg Q4W dosing. The results informed the dosing of phase III studies of anifrolumab in new indications and present a novel approach to PBPK modeling coupled with relative transcriptomics in simulating pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 1","pages":"105-117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706429/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aida N. Kawuma, Francis Williams Ojara, Allan Buzibye, Barbara Castelnuovo, Jovia C. Tabwenda, Jacqueline Kyeyune, Christine Turyahabwe, Simon Peter Asiimwe, Johnson Magoola, Lubbe Wiesner, Ritah Nakijoba, Catriona Waitt
Pharmacokinetic studies are important for understanding drug disposition in the human body. However, pregnant and lactating women are often excluded from primary pharmacokinetic studies and as such there is often limited dosing information regarding drug use in pregnant and/or lactating women. The objectives of this interim analysis were to define the transfer of rifampicin to a breastfed infant and to determine the area under the concentration–time curve of rifampicin in maternal plasma, breastmilk and infant plasma. Performing this interim analysis enabled us to substantiate whether prior assumptions we made on several study design issues including patient sample size and pharmacokinetic sampling times held and whether we needed to amend our protocol or not. We enrolled lactating mothers on treatment for tuberculosis with their breastfeeding infants (below 12 months of age), performed intensive pharmacokinetic sampling (0–24 h post-dose) on plasma samples from both the mother, infant(s) and breastmilk samples from the mother on two separate occasions (once during the initiation phase and another during the continuation phase of tuberculosis treatment). The initial study design, including sampling times, was informed by a stochastic simulation and estimation exercise, with very limited prior breastmilk data. An interim analysis after recruiting 6 mother–infant pairs ascertained that our initial assumptions were ideal for achieving our study objectives and no amendments to the sampling times were necessary. Initial data from 6 mother–infant pairs show that rifampicin penetrates breastmilk with an approximate milk-to-plasma ratio of 0.169 and 0.189 on two separate visits. However, it was undetectable in most infants.
{"title":"Interim analysis, a tool to enhance efficiency of pharmacokinetic studies: Pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in lactating mother–infant pairs","authors":"Aida N. Kawuma, Francis Williams Ojara, Allan Buzibye, Barbara Castelnuovo, Jovia C. Tabwenda, Jacqueline Kyeyune, Christine Turyahabwe, Simon Peter Asiimwe, Johnson Magoola, Lubbe Wiesner, Ritah Nakijoba, Catriona Waitt","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13247","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13247","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacokinetic studies are important for understanding drug disposition in the human body. However, pregnant and lactating women are often excluded from primary pharmacokinetic studies and as such there is often limited dosing information regarding drug use in pregnant and/or lactating women. The objectives of this interim analysis were to define the transfer of rifampicin to a breastfed infant and to determine the area under the concentration–time curve of rifampicin in maternal plasma, breastmilk and infant plasma. Performing this interim analysis enabled us to substantiate whether prior assumptions we made on several study design issues including patient sample size and pharmacokinetic sampling times held and whether we needed to amend our protocol or not. We enrolled lactating mothers on treatment for tuberculosis with their breastfeeding infants (below 12 months of age), performed intensive pharmacokinetic sampling (0–24 h post-dose) on plasma samples from both the mother, infant(s) and breastmilk samples from the mother on two separate occasions (once during the initiation phase and another during the continuation phase of tuberculosis treatment). The initial study design, including sampling times, was informed by a stochastic simulation and estimation exercise, with very limited prior breastmilk data. An interim analysis after recruiting 6 mother–infant pairs ascertained that our initial assumptions were ideal for achieving our study objectives and no amendments to the sampling times were necessary. Initial data from 6 mother–infant pairs show that rifampicin penetrates breastmilk with an approximate milk-to-plasma ratio of 0.169 and 0.189 on two separate visits. However, it was undetectable in most infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"13 11","pages":"1915-1923"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13247","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Justine Henriot, André Dallmann, François Dupuis, Jérémy Perrier, Sebastian Frechen
Gastrointestinal first-pass metabolism plays an important role in bioavailability and in drug–drug interactions. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a powerful tool to integrate these processes mechanistically. However, a correct bottom-up prediction of GI first-pass metabolism is challenging and depends on various model parameters like the level of enzyme expression and the basolateral intestinal mucosa permeability (Pmucosa). This work aimed to investigate if cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 expression could help predict the first-pass effect using PBPK modeling or whether additional factors like Pmucosa do play additional roles using PBPK modeling. To this end, a systematic review of the absolute CYP3A expression in the human gastrointestinal tract and liver was conducted. The resulting CYP3A4 expression profile and two previously published profiles were applied to PBPK models of seven CYP3A4 substrates (alfentanil, alprazolam, felodipine, midazolam, sildenafil, triazolam, and verapamil) built-in PK-Sim®. For each compound, it was assessed whether first-pass metabolism could be adequately predicted based on the integrated CYP3A4 expression profile alone or whether an optimization of Pmucosa was required. Evaluation criteria were the precision of the predicted interstudy bioavailabilities and area under the concentration–time curves. It was found that none of the expression profiles provided upfront an adequate description of the extent of GI metabolism and that optimization of Pmucosa as a compound-specific parameter improved the prediction of most models. Our findings indicate that a pure bottom-up prediction of gastrointestinal first-pass metabolism is currently not possible and that compound-specific features like Pmucosa must be considered as well.
{"title":"PBPK modeling: What is the role of CYP3A4 expression in the gastrointestinal tract to accurately predict first-pass metabolism?","authors":"Justine Henriot, André Dallmann, François Dupuis, Jérémy Perrier, Sebastian Frechen","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13249","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.13249","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gastrointestinal first-pass metabolism plays an important role in bioavailability and in drug–drug interactions. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a powerful tool to integrate these processes mechanistically. However, a correct bottom-up prediction of GI first-pass metabolism is challenging and depends on various model parameters like the level of enzyme expression and the basolateral intestinal mucosa permeability (<i>P</i><sub>mucosa</sub>). This work aimed to investigate if cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 expression could help predict the first-pass effect using PBPK modeling or whether additional factors like <i>P</i><sub>mucosa</sub> do play additional roles using PBPK modeling. To this end, a systematic review of the absolute CYP3A expression in the human gastrointestinal tract and liver was conducted. The resulting CYP3A4 expression profile and two previously published profiles were applied to PBPK models of seven CYP3A4 substrates (alfentanil, alprazolam, felodipine, midazolam, sildenafil, triazolam, and verapamil) built-in PK-Sim®. For each compound, it was assessed whether first-pass metabolism could be adequately predicted based on the integrated CYP3A4 expression profile alone or whether an optimization of <i>P</i><sub>mucosa</sub> was required. Evaluation criteria were the precision of the predicted interstudy bioavailabilities and area under the concentration–time curves. It was found that none of the expression profiles provided upfront an adequate description of the extent of GI metabolism and that optimization of <i>P</i><sub>mucosa</sub> as a compound-specific parameter improved the prediction of most models. Our findings indicate that a pure bottom-up prediction of gastrointestinal first-pass metabolism is currently not possible and that compound-specific features like <i>P</i><sub>mucosa</sub> must be considered as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 1","pages":"130-141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706425/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}