首页 > 最新文献

Critical Reviews in Toxicology最新文献

英文 中文
Subject: call for papers-critical reviews in toxicology. 主题:毒理学评论论文征集。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-10 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2270291
Roger O McClellan
{"title":"Subject: call for papers-critical reviews in toxicology.","authors":"Roger O McClellan","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2270291","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2270291","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"480"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49689179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International regulatory uses of acute systemic toxicity data and integration of new approach methodologies. 急性系统毒性数据的国际监管使用和新方法的整合。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852
Judy Strickland, Esther Haugabrooks, David G Allen, Luciene B Balottin, Yoko Hirabayashi, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hajime Kojima, Claudio Nishizawa, Pilar Prieto, Deborah E Ratzlaff, Jayoung Jeong, JinHee Lee, Ying Yang, Pinpin Lin, Kristie Sullivan, Warren Casey

Chemical regulatory authorities around the world require systemic toxicity data from acute exposures via the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes for human health risk assessment. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for these tests, we reviewed acute systemic toxicity testing requirements for jurisdictions that participate in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. The chemical sectors included in our review of each jurisdiction were cosmetics, consumer products, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and pesticides. We found acute systemic toxicity data were most often required for hazard assessment, classification, and labeling, and to a lesser extent quantitative risk assessment. Where animal methods were required, animal reduction methods were typically recommended. For many jurisdictions and chemical sectors, non-animal alternatives are not accepted, but several jurisdictions provide guidance to support the use of test waivers to reduce animal use for specific applications. An understanding of international regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity testing will inform ICATM's strategy for the development, acceptance, and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with acute toxicity.

世界各地的化学监管机构需要通过口服、皮肤和吸入途径急性暴露的系统毒性数据,以进行人类健康风险评估。为了确定非动物替代品用于这些试验的监管使用机会,我们审查了参与替代试验方法国际合作(ICATM)的司法管辖区的急性全身毒性试验要求:巴西、加拿大、中国、欧盟、日本、韩国、台湾和美国。我们对每个管辖区的审查中包括的化学行业包括化妆品、消费品、工业化学品、制药、医疗器械和农药。我们发现,急性全身毒性数据通常是危险评估、分类和标记所需的,在较小程度上是定量风险评估所需的。在需要动物方法的情况下,通常建议使用动物减少方法。对于许多司法管辖区和化学行业,不接受非动物替代品,但一些司法管辖区提供了指导,支持使用测试豁免来减少特定应用中的动物使用。了解急性全身毒性测试的国际监管要求将为ICATM开发、接受和实施非动物替代品的战略提供信息,以评估与急性毒性相关的健康危害和风险。
{"title":"International regulatory uses of acute systemic toxicity data and integration of new approach methodologies.","authors":"Judy Strickland, Esther Haugabrooks, David G Allen, Luciene B Balottin, Yoko Hirabayashi, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hajime Kojima, Claudio Nishizawa, Pilar Prieto, Deborah E Ratzlaff, Jayoung Jeong, JinHee Lee, Ying Yang, Pinpin Lin, Kristie Sullivan, Warren Casey","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemical regulatory authorities around the world require systemic toxicity data from acute exposures via the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes for human health risk assessment. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for these tests, we reviewed acute systemic toxicity testing requirements for jurisdictions that participate in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. The chemical sectors included in our review of each jurisdiction were cosmetics, consumer products, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and pesticides. We found acute systemic toxicity data were most often required for hazard assessment, classification, and labeling, and to a lesser extent quantitative risk assessment. Where animal methods were required, animal reduction methods were typically recommended. For many jurisdictions and chemical sectors, non-animal alternatives are not accepted, but several jurisdictions provide guidance to support the use of test waivers to reduce animal use for specific applications. An understanding of international regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity testing will inform ICATM's strategy for the development, acceptance, and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with acute toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"385-411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592330/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10549589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to the letter to the editor regarding the article "Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts" by Garvey et al. (2023). 对Garvey等人(2023)关于“全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷酸化学诱导免疫毒性的证据权重评估:独立专家小组的调查结果”一文致编辑的信的回应。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2240841
Gregory J Garvey, Janet K Anderson, Philip P Goodrum, Kirby H Tyndall, L Anthony Cox, Mahin Khatami, Jorge Morales-Montor, Rita S Schoeny, Jennifer G Seed, Rajeev K Tyagi, Christopher R Kirman, Sean M Hays
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to Dr. Post’s letter (Post 2023) regarding our recent publication. We are pleased that our paper and the work of the independent panel of experts is gaining such attention and we appreciate the opportunity to respond and correct the record. Dr. Post suggests there are “inaccuracies” in our statements regarding the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). We divided her comment letter into three sections and provide responses below.
{"title":"Response to the letter to the editor regarding the article \"Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts\" by Garvey et al. (2023).","authors":"Gregory J Garvey,&nbsp;Janet K Anderson,&nbsp;Philip P Goodrum,&nbsp;Kirby H Tyndall,&nbsp;L Anthony Cox,&nbsp;Mahin Khatami,&nbsp;Jorge Morales-Montor,&nbsp;Rita S Schoeny,&nbsp;Jennifer G Seed,&nbsp;Rajeev K Tyagi,&nbsp;Christopher R Kirman,&nbsp;Sean M Hays","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240841","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240841","url":null,"abstract":"Thank you for the opportunity to respond to Dr. Post’s letter (Post 2023) regarding our recent publication. We are pleased that our paper and the work of the independent panel of experts is gaining such attention and we appreciate the opportunity to respond and correct the record. Dr. Post suggests there are “inaccuracies” in our statements regarding the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). We divided her comment letter into three sections and provide responses below.","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"438-439"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10069403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor about the article "Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts" by Garvey et al. (2023). 关于Garvey等人的文章“全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷酸化学诱导免疫毒性的证据权重评估:独立专家小组的发现”给编辑的信。(2023)。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2240903
Gloria B Post
This letter is written regarding the recently published paper, Garvey et al. (2023). “Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts,” doi:10.1080/10408444.2023.2194913. I am writing to correct inaccuracies in the information about the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors (Reference Doses [RfDs]; Minimal Risk Levels [MRLs]) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) that Garvey et al. attributed to my publication, Post (2021). Garvey et al. state:
{"title":"Letter to the editor about the article \"Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts\" by Garvey et al. (2023).","authors":"Gloria B Post","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240903","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240903","url":null,"abstract":"This letter is written regarding the recently published paper, Garvey et al. (2023). “Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts,” doi:10.1080/10408444.2023.2194913. I am writing to correct inaccuracies in the information about the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors (Reference Doses [RfDs]; Minimal Risk Levels [MRLs]) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) that Garvey et al. attributed to my publication, Post (2021). Garvey et al. state:","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"436-437"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10069406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The environment and male reproductive system: the potential role and underlying mechanisms of cadmium in testis cancer. 环境与男性生殖系统:镉在睾丸癌症中的潜在作用和潜在机制。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2250387
Cristina de Angelis, Giacomo Galdiero, Davide Menafra, Francesco Garifalos, Nunzia Verde, Mariangela Piscopo, Mariarosaria Negri, Renata Simona Auriemma, Chiara Simeoli, Claudia Pivonello, Annamaria Colao, Rosario Pivonello

Cadmium is a known human carcinogen, and has been shown to profoundly affect male reproductive function, at multiple levels, by exerting both endocrine and non-endocrine actions. Nevertheless, the potential role of cadmium in the etiology of testis cancer has been scantly investigated in humans, and, currently, available epidemiological observational studies are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions in this regard. On the contrary, experimental studies in laboratory animals demonstrated that cadmium is a strong inducer of testis tumors, mostly represented by benign Leydig cell adenoma; moreover, malignant transformation was also reported in few animals, following cadmium treatment. Early experimental studies in animals proposed an endocrine-dependent mechanism of cadmium-induced testis tumorigenesis; however, more recent findings from cell-free assays, in vitro studies, and short-term in vivo studies, highlighted that cadmium might also contribute to testis tumor development by early occurring endocrine-independent mechanisms, which include aberrant gene expression within the testis, and genotoxic effects, and take place well before the timing of testis tumorigenesis. These endocrine-independent mechanisms, however, have not been directly investigated on testis tumor samples retrieved from affected, cadmium-treated animals so far. The present review focuses on the relationship between cadmium exposure and testis cancer, by reporting the few epidemiological observational human studies available, and by providing animal-based experimental evidences of cadmium implication in the pathogenesis and progression of testis tumor. Moreover, the relevance of experimental animal studies to human cadmium exposure and the translational potential of experimental findings will be extensively discussed, by critically addressing strengths and weaknesses of available data.

镉是一种已知的人类致癌物,已被证明通过发挥内分泌和非内分泌作用,在多个层面上深刻影响男性生殖功能。尽管如此,对镉在人类睾丸癌症病因中的潜在作用的研究很少,目前可用的流行病学观察研究不足以得出这方面的明确结论。相反,在实验动物中的实验研究表明,镉是睾丸肿瘤的强诱导剂,主要以良性睾丸间质细胞腺瘤为代表;此外,在镉处理后,少数动物也发生了恶性转化。早期的动物实验研究提出了镉诱导睾丸肿瘤发生的内分泌依赖机制;然而,来自无细胞测定、体外研究和短期体内研究的最新发现强调,镉也可能通过早期发生的内分泌无关机制(包括睾丸内异常基因表达和遗传毒性效应)促进睾丸肿瘤的发展,并且发生在睾丸肿瘤发生之前。然而,到目前为止,这些与内分泌无关的机制还没有在从受影响的镉处理动物的睾丸肿瘤样本中直接研究。本综述通过报道少数可用的流行病学观察人类研究,并通过提供镉在睾丸肿瘤发病机制和进展中的作用的动物实验证据,重点关注镉暴露与睾丸癌症之间的关系。此外,将通过批判性地解决现有数据的优势和劣势,广泛讨论实验动物研究与人类镉暴露的相关性以及实验结果的转化潜力。
{"title":"The environment and male reproductive system: the potential role and underlying mechanisms of cadmium in testis cancer.","authors":"Cristina de Angelis,&nbsp;Giacomo Galdiero,&nbsp;Davide Menafra,&nbsp;Francesco Garifalos,&nbsp;Nunzia Verde,&nbsp;Mariangela Piscopo,&nbsp;Mariarosaria Negri,&nbsp;Renata Simona Auriemma,&nbsp;Chiara Simeoli,&nbsp;Claudia Pivonello,&nbsp;Annamaria Colao,&nbsp;Rosario Pivonello","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2250387","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2250387","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cadmium is a known human carcinogen, and has been shown to profoundly affect male reproductive function, at multiple levels, by exerting both endocrine and non-endocrine actions. Nevertheless, the potential role of cadmium in the etiology of testis cancer has been scantly investigated in humans, and, currently, available epidemiological observational studies are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions in this regard. On the contrary, experimental studies in laboratory animals demonstrated that cadmium is a strong inducer of testis tumors, mostly represented by benign Leydig cell adenoma; moreover, malignant transformation was also reported in few animals, following cadmium treatment. Early experimental studies in animals proposed an endocrine-dependent mechanism of cadmium-induced testis tumorigenesis; however, more recent findings from cell-free assays, <i>in vitro</i> studies, and short-term <i>in vivo</i> studies, highlighted that cadmium might also contribute to testis tumor development by early occurring endocrine-independent mechanisms, which include aberrant gene expression within the testis, and genotoxic effects, and take place well before the timing of testis tumorigenesis. These endocrine-independent mechanisms, however, have not been directly investigated on testis tumor samples retrieved from affected, cadmium-treated animals so far. The present review focuses on the relationship between cadmium exposure and testis cancer, by reporting the few epidemiological observational human studies available, and by providing animal-based experimental evidences of cadmium implication in the pathogenesis and progression of testis tumor. Moreover, the relevance of experimental animal studies to human cadmium exposure and the translational potential of experimental findings will be extensively discussed, by critically addressing strengths and weaknesses of available data.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"412-435"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41115950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigations on learning and memory function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies - when considered needed and based on what? 在延长的一代生殖毒性研究中对学习和记忆功能的调查——何时需要,基于什么?
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-04 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2236134
Josje H E Arts, Frank Faulhammer, Steffen Schneider, Joanne G W Salverda

To justify investigations on learning and memory (L&M) function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies (EOGRTS; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 443) for registration under Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemical (REACH), the European Chemicals Agency has referred to three publications based on which the Agency concluded that "perturbation of thyroid hormone signaling in offspring affects spatial cognitive abilities (learning and memory)" and "Therefore, it is necessary to conduct spatial learning and memory tests for F1 animals". In this paper, the inclusion of the requested L&M tests in an EOGRTS is challenged. In addition, next to the question on the validity of rodent models in general for testing thyroid hormone-dependent perturbations in brain development, the reliability of the publications specifically relied upon by the agency is questioned as these contain numerous fundamental errors in study methodology, design, and data reporting, provide contradicting results, lack crucial information to validate the results and exclude confounding factors, and finally show no causal relationship. Therefore, in our opinion, these publications cannot be used to substantiate, support, or conclude that decreases in blood thyroid (T4) hormone level on their own would result in impaired L&M in rats and are thus not adequate to use as fundament to ask for L&M testing as part of an EOGRTS.

为了证明在一代生殖毒性研究(EOGRTS;经济合作与发展组织(OECD)测试指南(TG)443)中对学习记忆(L&M)功能的调查是合理的,以便在化学品注册、评估、授权和限制(REACH)下注册,欧洲化学品管理局参考了三份出版物,该机构根据这些出版物得出结论,“后代甲状腺激素信号的干扰会影响空间认知能力(学习和记忆)”和“因此,有必要对F1动物进行空间学习和记忆测试”。在本文中,将要求的L&M测试纳入EOGRTS是一个挑战。此外,除了啮齿动物模型在测试大脑发育中甲状腺激素依赖性扰动方面的有效性问题之外,该机构专门依赖的出版物的可靠性也受到质疑,因为这些出版物在研究方法、设计和数据报告方面存在许多根本错误,提供了相互矛盾的结果,缺乏关键信息来验证结果并排除混杂因素,最终没有显示出因果关系。因此,在我们看来,这些出版物不能用来证实、支持或得出结论,即血液甲状腺(T4)激素水平的降低本身会导致大鼠的L&M受损,因此不足以作为要求将L&M测试作为EOGRTS的一部分的基础。
{"title":"Investigations on learning and memory function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies - when considered needed and based on what?","authors":"Josje H E Arts,&nbsp;Frank Faulhammer,&nbsp;Steffen Schneider,&nbsp;Joanne G W Salverda","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2236134","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2236134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To justify investigations on learning and memory (L&M) function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies (EOGRTS; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 443) for registration under Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemical (REACH), the European Chemicals Agency has referred to three publications based on which the Agency concluded that \"perturbation of thyroid hormone signaling in offspring affects spatial cognitive abilities (learning and memory)\" and \"Therefore, it is necessary to conduct spatial learning and memory tests for F1 animals\". In this paper, the inclusion of the requested L&M tests in an EOGRTS is challenged. In addition, next to the question on the validity of rodent models in general for testing thyroid hormone-dependent perturbations in brain development, the reliability of the publications specifically relied upon by the agency is questioned as these contain numerous fundamental errors in study methodology, design, and data reporting, provide contradicting results, lack crucial information to validate the results and exclude confounding factors, and finally show no causal relationship. Therefore, in our opinion, these publications cannot be used to substantiate, support, or conclude that decreases in blood thyroid (T4) hormone level on their own would result in impaired L&M in rats and are thus not adequate to use as fundament to ask for L&M testing as part of an EOGRTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 6","pages":"372-384"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10115163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards a science-based testing strategy to identify maternal thyroid hormone imbalance and neurodevelopmental effects in the progeny - Part IV: the ECETOC and CLE Proposal for a Thyroid Function-Related Neurodevelopmental Toxicity Testing and Assessment Scheme (Thyroid-NDT-TAS). 建立一种基于科学的测试策略,以确定母体甲状腺激素失衡和后代神经发育影响——第四部分:甲状腺功能相关神经发育毒性测试和评估计划(甲状腺NDT TAS)的ECETOC和CLE提案。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-09 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2231033
Stephanie Melching-Kollmuss, Kathrin Bothe, Alex Charlton, Babunilayam Gangadharan, Rashin Ghaffari, Sylvia Jacobi, Sue Marty, Heike-Antje Marxfeld, Elizabeth F McInnes, Ursula G Sauer, Larry P Sheets, Christian Strupp, Helen Tinwell, Christiane Wiemann, Philip A Botham, Bennard van Ravenzwaay

Following the European Commission Endocrine Disruptor Criteria, substances shall be considered as having endocrine disrupting properties if they (a) elicit adverse effects, (b) have endocrine activity, and (c) the two are linked by an endocrine mode-of-action (MoA) unless the MoA is not relevant for humans. A comprehensive, structured approach to assess whether substances meet the Endocrine Disruptor Criteria for the thyroid modality (EDC-T) is currently unavailable. Here, the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals Thyroxine Task Force and CropLife Europe propose a Thyroid Function-Related Neurodevelopmental Toxicity Testing and Assessment Scheme (Thyroid-NDT-TAS). In Tier 0, before entering the Thyroid-NDT-TAS, all available in vivo, in vitro and in silico data are submitted to weight-of-evidence (WoE) evaluations to determine whether the substance of interest poses a concern for thyroid disruption. If so, Tier 1 of the Thyroid-NDT-TAS includes an initial MoA and human relevance assessment (structured by the key events of possibly relevant adverse outcome pathways) and the generation of supportive in vitro/in silico data, if relevant. Only if Tier 1 is inconclusive, Tier 2 involves higher-tier testing to generate further thyroid- and/or neurodevelopment-related data. Tier 3 includes the final MoA and human relevance assessment and an overarching WoE evaluation to draw a conclusion on whether, or not, the substance meets the EDC-T. The Thyroid-NDT-TAS is based on the state-of-the-science, and it has been developed to minimise animal testing. To make human safety assessments more accurate, it is recommended to apply the Thyroid-NDT-TAS during future regulatory assessments.

根据欧盟委员会内分泌干扰物标准,如果物质(a)引起不良反应,(b)具有内分泌活性,以及(c)两者通过内分泌作用模式(MoA)联系在一起,则应视为具有内分泌干扰性,除非MoA与人类无关。目前还没有一种全面、结构化的方法来评估物质是否符合甲状腺内分泌紊乱标准(EDC-T)。在此,欧洲化学品生态毒理学和毒理学中心甲状腺素特别工作组和欧洲作物生命组织提出了甲状腺功能相关神经发育毒性测试和评估计划(甲状腺无损检测TAS)。在Tier 0中,在进入甲状腺无损检测TAS之前,将所有可用的体内、体外和计算机数据提交给证据权重(WoE)评估,以确定感兴趣的物质是否会引起甲状腺破坏。如果是,甲状腺无损检测TAS的第1级包括初始MoA和人类相关性评估(由可能相关的不良结果途径的关键事件构成),以及生成支持性的体外/计算机数据(如果相关)。只有在第1级没有结论的情况下,第2级才涉及更高级别的测试,以生成进一步的甲状腺和/或神经发育相关数据。第3层包括最终的MoA和人类相关性评估,以及总体的WoE评估,以得出该物质是否符合EDC-T的结论。甲状腺无损检测TAS以科学现状为基础,旨在最大限度地减少动物试验。为了使人类安全评估更加准确,建议在未来的监管评估中应用甲状腺无损检测TAS。
{"title":"Towards a science-based testing strategy to identify maternal thyroid hormone imbalance and neurodevelopmental effects in the progeny - Part IV: the ECETOC and CLE Proposal for a Thyroid Function-Related Neurodevelopmental Toxicity Testing and Assessment Scheme (Thyroid-NDT-TAS).","authors":"Stephanie Melching-Kollmuss,&nbsp;Kathrin Bothe,&nbsp;Alex Charlton,&nbsp;Babunilayam Gangadharan,&nbsp;Rashin Ghaffari,&nbsp;Sylvia Jacobi,&nbsp;Sue Marty,&nbsp;Heike-Antje Marxfeld,&nbsp;Elizabeth F McInnes,&nbsp;Ursula G Sauer,&nbsp;Larry P Sheets,&nbsp;Christian Strupp,&nbsp;Helen Tinwell,&nbsp;Christiane Wiemann,&nbsp;Philip A Botham,&nbsp;Bennard van Ravenzwaay","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2231033","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2231033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the European Commission Endocrine Disruptor Criteria, substances shall be considered as having endocrine disrupting properties if they (a) elicit adverse effects, (b) have endocrine activity, and (c) the two are linked by an endocrine mode-of-action (MoA) unless the MoA is not relevant for humans. A comprehensive, structured approach to assess whether substances meet the Endocrine Disruptor Criteria for the thyroid modality (EDC-T) is currently unavailable. Here, the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals Thyroxine Task Force and CropLife Europe propose a <u>Thyroid</u> Function-Related <u>N</u>euro<u>d</u>evelopmental <u>T</u>oxicity <u>T</u>esting and <u>A</u>ssessment <u>S</u>cheme (Thyroid-NDT-TAS). In Tier 0, before entering the Thyroid-NDT-TAS, all available <i>in vivo</i>, <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> data are submitted to weight-of-evidence (WoE) evaluations to determine whether the substance of interest poses a concern for thyroid disruption. If so, Tier 1 of the Thyroid-NDT-TAS includes an initial MoA and human relevance assessment (structured by the key events of possibly relevant adverse outcome pathways) and the generation of supportive <i>in vitro</i>/<i>in silico</i> data, if relevant. Only if Tier 1 is inconclusive, Tier 2 involves higher-tier testing to generate further thyroid- and/or neurodevelopment-related data. Tier 3 includes the final MoA and human relevance assessment and an overarching WoE evaluation to draw a conclusion on whether, or not, the substance meets the EDC-T. The Thyroid-NDT-TAS is based on the state-of-the-science, and it has been developed to minimise animal testing. To make human safety assessments more accurate, it is recommended to apply the Thyroid-NDT-TAS during future regulatory assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 6","pages":"339-371"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10490993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving interventional causal predictions in regulatory risk assessment. 改进监管风险评估中的干预因果预测。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2229923
Louis Anthony Cox
Abstract In 2022, the US EPA published an important risk assessment concluding that “Compared to the current annual standard, meeting a revised annual standard with a lower level is estimated to reduce PM2.5-associated health risks in the 30 annually-controlled study areas by about 7–9% for a level of 11.0 µg/m3… and 30–37% for a level of 8.0 µg/m3.” These are interventional causal predictions: they predict percentage reductions in mortality risks caused by different counterfactual reductions in fine particulate (PM2.5) levels. Valid causal predictions are possible if: (1) Study designs are used that can support valid causal inferences about the effects of interventions (e.g., quasi-experiments with appropriate control groups); (2) Appropriate causal models and methods are used to analyze the data; (3) Model assumptions are satisfied (at least approximately); and (4) Non-causal sources of exposure-response associations such as confounding, measurement error, and model misspecification are appropriately modeled and adjusted for. This paper examines two long-term mortality studies selected by the EPA to predict reductions in PM2.5-associated risk. Both papers use Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. For these models, none of these four conditions is satisfied, making it difficult to interpret or validate their causal predictions. Scientists, reviewers, regulators, and members of the public can benefit from more trustworthy and credible risk assessments and causal predictions by insisting that risk assessments supporting interventional causal conclusions be based on study designs, methods, and models that are appropriate for predicting effects caused by interventions.
2022年,美国环保署发布了一项重要的风险评估,结论是“与目前的年度标准相比,达到较低水平的修订年度标准,估计可将30个年度控制研究区域的pm2.5相关健康风险降低约7-9%,水平为11.0 μ g/m3……水平为8.0 μ g/m3时,风险降低30-37%。”这些都是干预性因果预测:它们预测了细颗粒物(PM2.5)水平不同的反事实降低所导致的死亡风险百分比降低。有效的因果预测是可能的,如果:(1)使用的研究设计可以支持有关干预措施效果的有效因果推断(例如,与适当对照组的准实验);(2)采用合适的因果模型和方法对数据进行分析;(3)模型假设满足(至少近似满足);(4)对暴露-反应关联的非因果来源,如混淆、测量误差和模型错误进行适当的建模和调整。本文考察了两项长期死亡率研究,这些研究是由美国环保署选择的,以预测pm2.5相关风险的降低。两篇论文都使用了Cox比例风险(PH)模型。对于这些模型来说,这四个条件都不满足,这使得解释或验证它们的因果预测变得困难。科学家、审稿人、监管机构和公众可以从更值得信赖和可信的风险评估和因果预测中受益,坚持支持干预性因果结论的风险评估应基于适合预测干预造成的影响的研究设计、方法和模型。
{"title":"Improving interventional causal predictions in regulatory risk assessment.","authors":"Louis Anthony Cox","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2229923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2229923","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2022, the US EPA published an important risk assessment concluding that “Compared to the current annual standard, meeting a revised annual standard with a lower level is estimated to reduce PM2.5-associated health risks in the 30 annually-controlled study areas by about 7–9% for a level of 11.0 µg/m3… and 30–37% for a level of 8.0 µg/m3.” These are interventional causal predictions: they predict percentage reductions in mortality risks caused by different counterfactual reductions in fine particulate (PM2.5) levels. Valid causal predictions are possible if: (1) Study designs are used that can support valid causal inferences about the effects of interventions (e.g., quasi-experiments with appropriate control groups); (2) Appropriate causal models and methods are used to analyze the data; (3) Model assumptions are satisfied (at least approximately); and (4) Non-causal sources of exposure-response associations such as confounding, measurement error, and model misspecification are appropriately modeled and adjusted for. This paper examines two long-term mortality studies selected by the EPA to predict reductions in PM2.5-associated risk. Both papers use Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. For these models, none of these four conditions is satisfied, making it difficult to interpret or validate their causal predictions. Scientists, reviewers, regulators, and members of the public can benefit from more trustworthy and credible risk assessments and causal predictions by insisting that risk assessments supporting interventional causal conclusions be based on study designs, methods, and models that are appropriate for predicting effects caused by interventions.","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 5","pages":"311-325"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9974560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Hazards of current concentration-setting practices in environmental toxicology studies. 环境毒理学研究中当前浓度设定做法的危害。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2229372
Jeffrey C Wolf, Helmut E Segner

The setting of concentrations for testing substances in ecotoxicological studies is often based on fractions of the concentrations that cause 50% mortality (LC50 or LD50) rather than environmentally relevant levels. This practice can result in exposures to animals at test concentrations that are magnitudes of order greater than those experienced in the environment. Often, such unrealistically high concentrations may cause non-specific biochemical or morphologic changes that primarily reflect the near-lethal health condition of the animal subjects, as opposed to effects characteristic of the particular test compound. Meanwhile, it is recognized that for many chemicals, the toxicologic mode of action (MOA) responsible for lethality may differ entirely from the MOAs that cause various sublethal effects. One argument for employing excessively high exposure concentrations in sublethal studies is to ensure the generation of positive toxicological effects, which can then be used to establish safety thresholds; however, it is possible that the pressure to produce exposure-related effects may also contribute to false positive outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to explore issues involving some current usages of acute LC50 data in ecotoxicology testing, and to propose an alternative strategy for performing this type of research moving forward. Toward those ends, a brief literature survey was conducted to gain an appreciation of methods that are currently being used to set test concentrations for sublethal definitive studies.

在生态毒理学研究中,测试物质的浓度设置通常基于造成50%死亡率的浓度(LC50或LD50),而不是环境相关水平。这种做法可能导致动物暴露在测试浓度下,其数量级大于环境中所经历的浓度。通常,这种不现实的高浓度可能导致非特异性生化或形态变化,这些变化主要反映了动物受试者的近乎致命的健康状况,而不是特定测试化合物的特征效应。与此同时,人们认识到,对许多化学品来说,致死性的毒理学作用方式(MOA)可能与引起各种亚致死效应的毒理学作用方式(MOA)完全不同。在亚致死研究中采用过高暴露浓度的一个论点是,确保产生积极的毒理学效应,然后可用于确定安全阈值;然而,产生暴露相关影响的压力也可能导致假阳性结果。本文的目的是探讨急性LC50数据在生态毒理学测试中的一些当前使用问题,并提出一种替代策略来进行这类研究。为此,进行了一项简短的文献调查,以了解目前用于确定亚致死决定性研究的测试浓度的方法。
{"title":"Hazards of current concentration-setting practices in environmental toxicology studies.","authors":"Jeffrey C Wolf,&nbsp;Helmut E Segner","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2229372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2229372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The setting of concentrations for testing substances in ecotoxicological studies is often based on fractions of the concentrations that cause 50% mortality (LC<sub>50</sub> or LD<sub>50</sub>) rather than environmentally relevant levels. This practice can result in exposures to animals at test concentrations that are magnitudes of order greater than those experienced in the environment. Often, such unrealistically high concentrations may cause non-specific biochemical or morphologic changes that primarily reflect the near-lethal health condition of the animal subjects, as opposed to effects characteristic of the particular test compound. Meanwhile, it is recognized that for many chemicals, the toxicologic mode of action (MOA) responsible for lethality may differ entirely from the MOAs that cause various sublethal effects. One argument for employing excessively high exposure concentrations in sublethal studies is to ensure the generation of positive toxicological effects, which can then be used to establish safety thresholds; however, it is possible that the pressure to produce exposure-related effects may also contribute to false positive outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to explore issues involving some current usages of acute LC<sub>50</sub> data in ecotoxicology testing, and to propose an alternative strategy for performing this type of research moving forward. Toward those ends, a brief literature survey was conducted to gain an appreciation of methods that are currently being used to set test concentrations for sublethal definitive studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 5","pages":"297-310"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10025267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection of anti-androgenic activity of chemicals in fish studies: a data review. 鱼类研究中化学物质抗雄激素活性的检测:数据综述。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398
Grace H Panter, Rebecca J Brown, Alan Jones, Oliver Körner, Laurent Lagadic, Lennart Weltje

A systematic review was conducted on the sensitivity of fish testing guidelines to detect the anti-androgenic activity of substances. Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) was used to investigate the conservation of the androgen receptor (AR) between humans and fish, and among fish species recommended in test guidelines. The AR is conserved between fish species and humans (i.e. ligand binding domain [LBD] homology ≥70%) and among the recommended fish species (LBD homology >85%). For model anti-androgens, we evaluated literature data on in vitro anti-androgenic activity in fish-specific receptor-based assays and changes in endpoints indicative of endocrine modulation from in vivo studies. Anti-androgenic activity was most consistently and reliably detected in in vitro and in vivo mechanistic studies with co-exposure to an androgen (spiggin in vitro assay, Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter [RADAR] Assay, and Androgenised Female Stickleback Screen). Regardless of study design (Fish Short-Term Reproduction Assay [FSTRA], Fish Sexual Development Test [FSDT], partial or full life-cycle tests), or endpoint (vitellogenin, secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal histopathology, sex ratio), there was no consistent evidence for detecting anti-androgenic activity in studies without androgen co-exposure, even for the most potent substances (while less potent substances may induce no (clear) response). Therefore, based on studies without androgen co-exposure (35 FSTRAs and 22 other studies), the other studies (including the FSDT) do not outperform the FSTRA for detecting potent anti-androgenic activity, which if suspected, would be best addressed with a RADAR assay. Overall, fish do not appear particularly sensitive to mammalian anti-androgens.

对检测物质抗雄激素活性的鱼类检测指南的敏感性进行了系统评价。利用序列比对预测跨物种敏感性(SeqAPASS)研究了人类和鱼类之间以及测试指南中推荐的鱼类之间雄激素受体(AR)的保守性。该AR在鱼类和人类之间(即配体结合域[LBD]同源性≥70%)和推荐鱼类之间(LBD同源性>85%)具有保守性。对于模型抗雄激素,我们评估了基于鱼类特异性受体的体外抗雄激素活性的文献数据,以及体内研究中指示内分泌调节的终点变化。抗雄激素活性在体外和体内机制研究中最一致和可靠地检测到,同时暴露于雄激素(spiggin体外试验、快速雄激素干扰活性报告[RADAR]试验和雄激素化雌性棘鱼筛查)。无论研究设计(鱼类短期繁殖试验[FSTRA]、鱼类性发育试验[FSDT]、部分或全部生命周期试验)或终点(卵黄原蛋白、第二性征、性腺组织病理学、性别比例)如何,在没有雄激素共同暴露的研究中,没有一致的证据可以检测到抗雄激素活性,即使是最有效的物质(而效力较弱的物质可能不会引起(明确的)反应)。因此,基于没有雄激素共暴露的研究(35个FSTRA和22个其他研究),其他研究(包括FSDT)在检测有效的抗雄激素活性方面并不优于FSTRA,如果怀疑,最好通过RADAR检测来解决。总的来说,鱼类似乎对哺乳动物的抗雄激素并不特别敏感。
{"title":"Detection of anti-androgenic activity of chemicals in fish studies: a data review.","authors":"Grace H Panter,&nbsp;Rebecca J Brown,&nbsp;Alan Jones,&nbsp;Oliver Körner,&nbsp;Laurent Lagadic,&nbsp;Lennart Weltje","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review was conducted on the sensitivity of fish testing guidelines to detect the anti-androgenic activity of substances. Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) was used to investigate the conservation of the androgen receptor (AR) between humans and fish, and among fish species recommended in test guidelines. The AR is conserved between fish species and humans (i.e. ligand binding domain [LBD] homology ≥70%) and among the recommended fish species (LBD homology >85%). For model anti-androgens, we evaluated literature data on <i>in vitro</i> anti-androgenic activity in fish-specific receptor-based assays and changes in endpoints indicative of endocrine modulation from <i>in vivo</i> studies. Anti-androgenic activity was most consistently and reliably detected in <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> mechanistic studies with co-exposure to an androgen (spiggin <i>in vitro</i> assay, Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter [RADAR] Assay, and Androgenised Female Stickleback Screen). Regardless of study design (Fish Short-Term Reproduction Assay [FSTRA], Fish Sexual Development Test [FSDT], partial or full life-cycle tests), or endpoint (vitellogenin, secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal histopathology, sex ratio), there was no consistent evidence for detecting anti-androgenic activity in studies without androgen co-exposure, even for the most potent substances (while less potent substances may induce no (clear) response). Therefore, based on studies without androgen co-exposure (35 FSTRAs and 22 other studies), the other studies (including the FSDT) do not outperform the FSTRA for detecting potent anti-androgenic activity, which if suspected, would be best addressed with a RADAR assay. Overall, fish do not appear particularly sensitive to mammalian anti-androgens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 5","pages":"326-338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10324863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1