Pub Date : 2023-09-01Epub Date: 2023-11-10DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2270291
Roger O McClellan
{"title":"Subject: call for papers-critical reviews in toxicology.","authors":"Roger O McClellan","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2270291","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2270291","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"480"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49689179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-08-30DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852
Judy Strickland, Esther Haugabrooks, David G Allen, Luciene B Balottin, Yoko Hirabayashi, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hajime Kojima, Claudio Nishizawa, Pilar Prieto, Deborah E Ratzlaff, Jayoung Jeong, JinHee Lee, Ying Yang, Pinpin Lin, Kristie Sullivan, Warren Casey
Chemical regulatory authorities around the world require systemic toxicity data from acute exposures via the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes for human health risk assessment. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for these tests, we reviewed acute systemic toxicity testing requirements for jurisdictions that participate in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. The chemical sectors included in our review of each jurisdiction were cosmetics, consumer products, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and pesticides. We found acute systemic toxicity data were most often required for hazard assessment, classification, and labeling, and to a lesser extent quantitative risk assessment. Where animal methods were required, animal reduction methods were typically recommended. For many jurisdictions and chemical sectors, non-animal alternatives are not accepted, but several jurisdictions provide guidance to support the use of test waivers to reduce animal use for specific applications. An understanding of international regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity testing will inform ICATM's strategy for the development, acceptance, and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with acute toxicity.
{"title":"International regulatory uses of acute systemic toxicity data and integration of new approach methodologies.","authors":"Judy Strickland, Esther Haugabrooks, David G Allen, Luciene B Balottin, Yoko Hirabayashi, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hajime Kojima, Claudio Nishizawa, Pilar Prieto, Deborah E Ratzlaff, Jayoung Jeong, JinHee Lee, Ying Yang, Pinpin Lin, Kristie Sullivan, Warren Casey","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemical regulatory authorities around the world require systemic toxicity data from acute exposures via the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes for human health risk assessment. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for these tests, we reviewed acute systemic toxicity testing requirements for jurisdictions that participate in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. The chemical sectors included in our review of each jurisdiction were cosmetics, consumer products, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and pesticides. We found acute systemic toxicity data were most often required for hazard assessment, classification, and labeling, and to a lesser extent quantitative risk assessment. Where animal methods were required, animal reduction methods were typically recommended. For many jurisdictions and chemical sectors, non-animal alternatives are not accepted, but several jurisdictions provide guidance to support the use of test waivers to reduce animal use for specific applications. An understanding of international regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity testing will inform ICATM's strategy for the development, acceptance, and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with acute toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"385-411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592330/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10549589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-08-25DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2240841
Gregory J Garvey, Janet K Anderson, Philip P Goodrum, Kirby H Tyndall, L Anthony Cox, Mahin Khatami, Jorge Morales-Montor, Rita S Schoeny, Jennifer G Seed, Rajeev K Tyagi, Christopher R Kirman, Sean M Hays
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to Dr. Post’s letter (Post 2023) regarding our recent publication. We are pleased that our paper and the work of the independent panel of experts is gaining such attention and we appreciate the opportunity to respond and correct the record. Dr. Post suggests there are “inaccuracies” in our statements regarding the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). We divided her comment letter into three sections and provide responses below.
{"title":"Response to the letter to the editor regarding the article \"Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts\" by Garvey et al. (2023).","authors":"Gregory J Garvey, Janet K Anderson, Philip P Goodrum, Kirby H Tyndall, L Anthony Cox, Mahin Khatami, Jorge Morales-Montor, Rita S Schoeny, Jennifer G Seed, Rajeev K Tyagi, Christopher R Kirman, Sean M Hays","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240841","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240841","url":null,"abstract":"Thank you for the opportunity to respond to Dr. Post’s letter (Post 2023) regarding our recent publication. We are pleased that our paper and the work of the independent panel of experts is gaining such attention and we appreciate the opportunity to respond and correct the record. Dr. Post suggests there are “inaccuracies” in our statements regarding the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). We divided her comment letter into three sections and provide responses below.","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"438-439"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10069403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-08-25DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2240903
Gloria B Post
This letter is written regarding the recently published paper, Garvey et al. (2023). “Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts,” doi:10.1080/10408444.2023.2194913. I am writing to correct inaccuracies in the information about the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors (Reference Doses [RfDs]; Minimal Risk Levels [MRLs]) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) that Garvey et al. attributed to my publication, Post (2021). Garvey et al. state:
{"title":"Letter to the editor about the article \"Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts\" by Garvey et al. (2023).","authors":"Gloria B Post","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240903","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240903","url":null,"abstract":"This letter is written regarding the recently published paper, Garvey et al. (2023). “Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts,” doi:10.1080/10408444.2023.2194913. I am writing to correct inaccuracies in the information about the use of immune system effects as the critical endpoints for toxicity factors (Reference Doses [RfDs]; Minimal Risk Levels [MRLs]) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) that Garvey et al. attributed to my publication, Post (2021). Garvey et al. state:","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"436-437"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10069406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cadmium is a known human carcinogen, and has been shown to profoundly affect male reproductive function, at multiple levels, by exerting both endocrine and non-endocrine actions. Nevertheless, the potential role of cadmium in the etiology of testis cancer has been scantly investigated in humans, and, currently, available epidemiological observational studies are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions in this regard. On the contrary, experimental studies in laboratory animals demonstrated that cadmium is a strong inducer of testis tumors, mostly represented by benign Leydig cell adenoma; moreover, malignant transformation was also reported in few animals, following cadmium treatment. Early experimental studies in animals proposed an endocrine-dependent mechanism of cadmium-induced testis tumorigenesis; however, more recent findings from cell-free assays, in vitro studies, and short-term in vivo studies, highlighted that cadmium might also contribute to testis tumor development by early occurring endocrine-independent mechanisms, which include aberrant gene expression within the testis, and genotoxic effects, and take place well before the timing of testis tumorigenesis. These endocrine-independent mechanisms, however, have not been directly investigated on testis tumor samples retrieved from affected, cadmium-treated animals so far. The present review focuses on the relationship between cadmium exposure and testis cancer, by reporting the few epidemiological observational human studies available, and by providing animal-based experimental evidences of cadmium implication in the pathogenesis and progression of testis tumor. Moreover, the relevance of experimental animal studies to human cadmium exposure and the translational potential of experimental findings will be extensively discussed, by critically addressing strengths and weaknesses of available data.
{"title":"The environment and male reproductive system: the potential role and underlying mechanisms of cadmium in testis cancer.","authors":"Cristina de Angelis, Giacomo Galdiero, Davide Menafra, Francesco Garifalos, Nunzia Verde, Mariangela Piscopo, Mariarosaria Negri, Renata Simona Auriemma, Chiara Simeoli, Claudia Pivonello, Annamaria Colao, Rosario Pivonello","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2250387","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2250387","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cadmium is a known human carcinogen, and has been shown to profoundly affect male reproductive function, at multiple levels, by exerting both endocrine and non-endocrine actions. Nevertheless, the potential role of cadmium in the etiology of testis cancer has been scantly investigated in humans, and, currently, available epidemiological observational studies are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions in this regard. On the contrary, experimental studies in laboratory animals demonstrated that cadmium is a strong inducer of testis tumors, mostly represented by benign Leydig cell adenoma; moreover, malignant transformation was also reported in few animals, following cadmium treatment. Early experimental studies in animals proposed an endocrine-dependent mechanism of cadmium-induced testis tumorigenesis; however, more recent findings from cell-free assays, <i>in vitro</i> studies, and short-term <i>in vivo</i> studies, highlighted that cadmium might also contribute to testis tumor development by early occurring endocrine-independent mechanisms, which include aberrant gene expression within the testis, and genotoxic effects, and take place well before the timing of testis tumorigenesis. These endocrine-independent mechanisms, however, have not been directly investigated on testis tumor samples retrieved from affected, cadmium-treated animals so far. The present review focuses on the relationship between cadmium exposure and testis cancer, by reporting the few epidemiological observational human studies available, and by providing animal-based experimental evidences of cadmium implication in the pathogenesis and progression of testis tumor. Moreover, the relevance of experimental animal studies to human cadmium exposure and the translational potential of experimental findings will be extensively discussed, by critically addressing strengths and weaknesses of available data.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"412-435"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41115950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01Epub Date: 2023-08-04DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2236134
Josje H E Arts, Frank Faulhammer, Steffen Schneider, Joanne G W Salverda
To justify investigations on learning and memory (L&M) function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies (EOGRTS; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 443) for registration under Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemical (REACH), the European Chemicals Agency has referred to three publications based on which the Agency concluded that "perturbation of thyroid hormone signaling in offspring affects spatial cognitive abilities (learning and memory)" and "Therefore, it is necessary to conduct spatial learning and memory tests for F1 animals". In this paper, the inclusion of the requested L&M tests in an EOGRTS is challenged. In addition, next to the question on the validity of rodent models in general for testing thyroid hormone-dependent perturbations in brain development, the reliability of the publications specifically relied upon by the agency is questioned as these contain numerous fundamental errors in study methodology, design, and data reporting, provide contradicting results, lack crucial information to validate the results and exclude confounding factors, and finally show no causal relationship. Therefore, in our opinion, these publications cannot be used to substantiate, support, or conclude that decreases in blood thyroid (T4) hormone level on their own would result in impaired L&M in rats and are thus not adequate to use as fundament to ask for L&M testing as part of an EOGRTS.
{"title":"Investigations on learning and memory function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies - when considered needed and based on what?","authors":"Josje H E Arts, Frank Faulhammer, Steffen Schneider, Joanne G W Salverda","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2236134","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2236134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To justify investigations on learning and memory (L&M) function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies (EOGRTS; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 443) for registration under Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemical (REACH), the European Chemicals Agency has referred to three publications based on which the Agency concluded that \"perturbation of thyroid hormone signaling in offspring affects spatial cognitive abilities (learning and memory)\" and \"Therefore, it is necessary to conduct spatial learning and memory tests for F1 animals\". In this paper, the inclusion of the requested L&M tests in an EOGRTS is challenged. In addition, next to the question on the validity of rodent models in general for testing thyroid hormone-dependent perturbations in brain development, the reliability of the publications specifically relied upon by the agency is questioned as these contain numerous fundamental errors in study methodology, design, and data reporting, provide contradicting results, lack crucial information to validate the results and exclude confounding factors, and finally show no causal relationship. Therefore, in our opinion, these publications cannot be used to substantiate, support, or conclude that decreases in blood thyroid (T4) hormone level on their own would result in impaired L&M in rats and are thus not adequate to use as fundament to ask for L&M testing as part of an EOGRTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 6","pages":"372-384"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10115163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01Epub Date: 2023-08-09DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2231033
Stephanie Melching-Kollmuss, Kathrin Bothe, Alex Charlton, Babunilayam Gangadharan, Rashin Ghaffari, Sylvia Jacobi, Sue Marty, Heike-Antje Marxfeld, Elizabeth F McInnes, Ursula G Sauer, Larry P Sheets, Christian Strupp, Helen Tinwell, Christiane Wiemann, Philip A Botham, Bennard van Ravenzwaay
Following the European Commission Endocrine Disruptor Criteria, substances shall be considered as having endocrine disrupting properties if they (a) elicit adverse effects, (b) have endocrine activity, and (c) the two are linked by an endocrine mode-of-action (MoA) unless the MoA is not relevant for humans. A comprehensive, structured approach to assess whether substances meet the Endocrine Disruptor Criteria for the thyroid modality (EDC-T) is currently unavailable. Here, the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals Thyroxine Task Force and CropLife Europe propose a Thyroid Function-Related Neurodevelopmental Toxicity Testing and Assessment Scheme (Thyroid-NDT-TAS). In Tier 0, before entering the Thyroid-NDT-TAS, all available in vivo, in vitro and in silico data are submitted to weight-of-evidence (WoE) evaluations to determine whether the substance of interest poses a concern for thyroid disruption. If so, Tier 1 of the Thyroid-NDT-TAS includes an initial MoA and human relevance assessment (structured by the key events of possibly relevant adverse outcome pathways) and the generation of supportive in vitro/in silico data, if relevant. Only if Tier 1 is inconclusive, Tier 2 involves higher-tier testing to generate further thyroid- and/or neurodevelopment-related data. Tier 3 includes the final MoA and human relevance assessment and an overarching WoE evaluation to draw a conclusion on whether, or not, the substance meets the EDC-T. The Thyroid-NDT-TAS is based on the state-of-the-science, and it has been developed to minimise animal testing. To make human safety assessments more accurate, it is recommended to apply the Thyroid-NDT-TAS during future regulatory assessments.
{"title":"Towards a science-based testing strategy to identify maternal thyroid hormone imbalance and neurodevelopmental effects in the progeny - Part IV: the ECETOC and CLE Proposal for a Thyroid Function-Related Neurodevelopmental Toxicity Testing and Assessment Scheme (Thyroid-NDT-TAS).","authors":"Stephanie Melching-Kollmuss, Kathrin Bothe, Alex Charlton, Babunilayam Gangadharan, Rashin Ghaffari, Sylvia Jacobi, Sue Marty, Heike-Antje Marxfeld, Elizabeth F McInnes, Ursula G Sauer, Larry P Sheets, Christian Strupp, Helen Tinwell, Christiane Wiemann, Philip A Botham, Bennard van Ravenzwaay","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2231033","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2231033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the European Commission Endocrine Disruptor Criteria, substances shall be considered as having endocrine disrupting properties if they (a) elicit adverse effects, (b) have endocrine activity, and (c) the two are linked by an endocrine mode-of-action (MoA) unless the MoA is not relevant for humans. A comprehensive, structured approach to assess whether substances meet the Endocrine Disruptor Criteria for the thyroid modality (EDC-T) is currently unavailable. Here, the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals Thyroxine Task Force and CropLife Europe propose a <u>Thyroid</u> Function-Related <u>N</u>euro<u>d</u>evelopmental <u>T</u>oxicity <u>T</u>esting and <u>A</u>ssessment <u>S</u>cheme (Thyroid-NDT-TAS). In Tier 0, before entering the Thyroid-NDT-TAS, all available <i>in vivo</i>, <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> data are submitted to weight-of-evidence (WoE) evaluations to determine whether the substance of interest poses a concern for thyroid disruption. If so, Tier 1 of the Thyroid-NDT-TAS includes an initial MoA and human relevance assessment (structured by the key events of possibly relevant adverse outcome pathways) and the generation of supportive <i>in vitro</i>/<i>in silico</i> data, if relevant. Only if Tier 1 is inconclusive, Tier 2 involves higher-tier testing to generate further thyroid- and/or neurodevelopment-related data. Tier 3 includes the final MoA and human relevance assessment and an overarching WoE evaluation to draw a conclusion on whether, or not, the substance meets the EDC-T. The Thyroid-NDT-TAS is based on the state-of-the-science, and it has been developed to minimise animal testing. To make human safety assessments more accurate, it is recommended to apply the Thyroid-NDT-TAS during future regulatory assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 6","pages":"339-371"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10490993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2229923
Louis Anthony Cox
Abstract In 2022, the US EPA published an important risk assessment concluding that “Compared to the current annual standard, meeting a revised annual standard with a lower level is estimated to reduce PM2.5-associated health risks in the 30 annually-controlled study areas by about 7–9% for a level of 11.0 µg/m3… and 30–37% for a level of 8.0 µg/m3.” These are interventional causal predictions: they predict percentage reductions in mortality risks caused by different counterfactual reductions in fine particulate (PM2.5) levels. Valid causal predictions are possible if: (1) Study designs are used that can support valid causal inferences about the effects of interventions (e.g., quasi-experiments with appropriate control groups); (2) Appropriate causal models and methods are used to analyze the data; (3) Model assumptions are satisfied (at least approximately); and (4) Non-causal sources of exposure-response associations such as confounding, measurement error, and model misspecification are appropriately modeled and adjusted for. This paper examines two long-term mortality studies selected by the EPA to predict reductions in PM2.5-associated risk. Both papers use Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. For these models, none of these four conditions is satisfied, making it difficult to interpret or validate their causal predictions. Scientists, reviewers, regulators, and members of the public can benefit from more trustworthy and credible risk assessments and causal predictions by insisting that risk assessments supporting interventional causal conclusions be based on study designs, methods, and models that are appropriate for predicting effects caused by interventions.
{"title":"Improving interventional causal predictions in regulatory risk assessment.","authors":"Louis Anthony Cox","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2229923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2229923","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2022, the US EPA published an important risk assessment concluding that “Compared to the current annual standard, meeting a revised annual standard with a lower level is estimated to reduce PM2.5-associated health risks in the 30 annually-controlled study areas by about 7–9% for a level of 11.0 µg/m3… and 30–37% for a level of 8.0 µg/m3.” These are interventional causal predictions: they predict percentage reductions in mortality risks caused by different counterfactual reductions in fine particulate (PM2.5) levels. Valid causal predictions are possible if: (1) Study designs are used that can support valid causal inferences about the effects of interventions (e.g., quasi-experiments with appropriate control groups); (2) Appropriate causal models and methods are used to analyze the data; (3) Model assumptions are satisfied (at least approximately); and (4) Non-causal sources of exposure-response associations such as confounding, measurement error, and model misspecification are appropriately modeled and adjusted for. This paper examines two long-term mortality studies selected by the EPA to predict reductions in PM2.5-associated risk. Both papers use Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. For these models, none of these four conditions is satisfied, making it difficult to interpret or validate their causal predictions. Scientists, reviewers, regulators, and members of the public can benefit from more trustworthy and credible risk assessments and causal predictions by insisting that risk assessments supporting interventional causal conclusions be based on study designs, methods, and models that are appropriate for predicting effects caused by interventions.","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 5","pages":"311-325"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9974560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2229372
Jeffrey C Wolf, Helmut E Segner
The setting of concentrations for testing substances in ecotoxicological studies is often based on fractions of the concentrations that cause 50% mortality (LC50 or LD50) rather than environmentally relevant levels. This practice can result in exposures to animals at test concentrations that are magnitudes of order greater than those experienced in the environment. Often, such unrealistically high concentrations may cause non-specific biochemical or morphologic changes that primarily reflect the near-lethal health condition of the animal subjects, as opposed to effects characteristic of the particular test compound. Meanwhile, it is recognized that for many chemicals, the toxicologic mode of action (MOA) responsible for lethality may differ entirely from the MOAs that cause various sublethal effects. One argument for employing excessively high exposure concentrations in sublethal studies is to ensure the generation of positive toxicological effects, which can then be used to establish safety thresholds; however, it is possible that the pressure to produce exposure-related effects may also contribute to false positive outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to explore issues involving some current usages of acute LC50 data in ecotoxicology testing, and to propose an alternative strategy for performing this type of research moving forward. Toward those ends, a brief literature survey was conducted to gain an appreciation of methods that are currently being used to set test concentrations for sublethal definitive studies.
{"title":"Hazards of current concentration-setting practices in environmental toxicology studies.","authors":"Jeffrey C Wolf, Helmut E Segner","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2229372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2229372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The setting of concentrations for testing substances in ecotoxicological studies is often based on fractions of the concentrations that cause 50% mortality (LC<sub>50</sub> or LD<sub>50</sub>) rather than environmentally relevant levels. This practice can result in exposures to animals at test concentrations that are magnitudes of order greater than those experienced in the environment. Often, such unrealistically high concentrations may cause non-specific biochemical or morphologic changes that primarily reflect the near-lethal health condition of the animal subjects, as opposed to effects characteristic of the particular test compound. Meanwhile, it is recognized that for many chemicals, the toxicologic mode of action (MOA) responsible for lethality may differ entirely from the MOAs that cause various sublethal effects. One argument for employing excessively high exposure concentrations in sublethal studies is to ensure the generation of positive toxicological effects, which can then be used to establish safety thresholds; however, it is possible that the pressure to produce exposure-related effects may also contribute to false positive outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to explore issues involving some current usages of acute LC<sub>50</sub> data in ecotoxicology testing, and to propose an alternative strategy for performing this type of research moving forward. Toward those ends, a brief literature survey was conducted to gain an appreciation of methods that are currently being used to set test concentrations for sublethal definitive studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 5","pages":"297-310"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10025267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398
Grace H Panter, Rebecca J Brown, Alan Jones, Oliver Körner, Laurent Lagadic, Lennart Weltje
A systematic review was conducted on the sensitivity of fish testing guidelines to detect the anti-androgenic activity of substances. Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) was used to investigate the conservation of the androgen receptor (AR) between humans and fish, and among fish species recommended in test guidelines. The AR is conserved between fish species and humans (i.e. ligand binding domain [LBD] homology ≥70%) and among the recommended fish species (LBD homology >85%). For model anti-androgens, we evaluated literature data on in vitro anti-androgenic activity in fish-specific receptor-based assays and changes in endpoints indicative of endocrine modulation from in vivo studies. Anti-androgenic activity was most consistently and reliably detected in in vitro and in vivo mechanistic studies with co-exposure to an androgen (spiggin in vitro assay, Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter [RADAR] Assay, and Androgenised Female Stickleback Screen). Regardless of study design (Fish Short-Term Reproduction Assay [FSTRA], Fish Sexual Development Test [FSDT], partial or full life-cycle tests), or endpoint (vitellogenin, secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal histopathology, sex ratio), there was no consistent evidence for detecting anti-androgenic activity in studies without androgen co-exposure, even for the most potent substances (while less potent substances may induce no (clear) response). Therefore, based on studies without androgen co-exposure (35 FSTRAs and 22 other studies), the other studies (including the FSDT) do not outperform the FSTRA for detecting potent anti-androgenic activity, which if suspected, would be best addressed with a RADAR assay. Overall, fish do not appear particularly sensitive to mammalian anti-androgens.
{"title":"Detection of anti-androgenic activity of chemicals in fish studies: a data review.","authors":"Grace H Panter, Rebecca J Brown, Alan Jones, Oliver Körner, Laurent Lagadic, Lennart Weltje","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review was conducted on the sensitivity of fish testing guidelines to detect the anti-androgenic activity of substances. Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) was used to investigate the conservation of the androgen receptor (AR) between humans and fish, and among fish species recommended in test guidelines. The AR is conserved between fish species and humans (i.e. ligand binding domain [LBD] homology ≥70%) and among the recommended fish species (LBD homology >85%). For model anti-androgens, we evaluated literature data on <i>in vitro</i> anti-androgenic activity in fish-specific receptor-based assays and changes in endpoints indicative of endocrine modulation from <i>in vivo</i> studies. Anti-androgenic activity was most consistently and reliably detected in <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> mechanistic studies with co-exposure to an androgen (spiggin <i>in vitro</i> assay, Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter [RADAR] Assay, and Androgenised Female Stickleback Screen). Regardless of study design (Fish Short-Term Reproduction Assay [FSTRA], Fish Sexual Development Test [FSDT], partial or full life-cycle tests), or endpoint (vitellogenin, secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal histopathology, sex ratio), there was no consistent evidence for detecting anti-androgenic activity in studies without androgen co-exposure, even for the most potent substances (while less potent substances may induce no (clear) response). Therefore, based on studies without androgen co-exposure (35 FSTRAs and 22 other studies), the other studies (including the FSDT) do not outperform the FSTRA for detecting potent anti-androgenic activity, which if suspected, would be best addressed with a RADAR assay. Overall, fish do not appear particularly sensitive to mammalian anti-androgens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 5","pages":"326-338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10324863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}