首页 > 最新文献

Addiction最新文献

英文 中文
Clinical characteristics of heroin overdose deaths among older adults in Australia, 2000-2025. 2000-2025年澳大利亚老年人海洛因过量死亡的临床特征
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/add.70216
Shane Darke, Johan Duflou, Michael Farrell, Julia Lappin, Amy Peacock

Aims: To determine: (1) the circumstances of death and case characteristics of heroin-related toxicity deaths aged ≥ 65 years in Australia, 2000-2025 and (2) the toxicological profile and major autopsy findings.

Design: Retrospective study of fatal heroin overdose cases aged ≥65 years, 2000-2025.

Setting: Australia-wide.

Cases: 59 cases were identified (65-69 years: 37, ≥70 years: 22), 51 (86.4%) male.

Measurements: Circumstances of death, toxicology, major autopsy findings.

Findings: No case occurred in the period 2000-2010, two between 2011 and 2015 and 57 between 2016 and 2025. All had documented histories of both substance use problems and injecting drug use. Cause of death was drug toxicity (n = 36, 61.0%) or combined drug toxicity and disease (n = 23, 39.0%), the majority being unintentional (n = 49, 83.1%). The final route of administration was by injection in 58 cases. Amongst cases in which toxicology was available for inspection (n = 52), the median free morphine concentration was 0.2 mg/l (0.0-3.7 mg/l), and 6-acetylmorphine was present in 34 (65.4%). Psychoactive drugs other than heroin were present in 45 (86.5%) cases. Of autopsied cases, 18 (56.3%) had severe coronary artery disease, 14 (43.8%) cardiomegaly and 11 (34.4%) replacement fibrosis, indicating a past infarct. Five cases (15.6%) were diagnosed with acute bronchopneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was detected in 12 (37.5%).

Conclusions: A new senior demographic of people who use heroin has emerged in Australia and is being reflected in overdose deaths. Systemic disease contributed to a large proportion of deaths between 2000 and 2025, and the toxicology is consistent with shorter survival times compared with younger cases.

目的:确定:(1)2000-2025年澳大利亚年龄≥65岁的海洛因相关毒性死亡的死亡情况和病例特征;(2)毒理学特征和主要尸检结果。设计:回顾性研究2000-2025年年龄≥65岁致死性海洛因过量病例。设置:Australia-wide。病例:确诊59例(65 ~ 69岁37例,≥70岁22例),男性51例(86.4%)。测量:死亡情况,毒理学,主要尸检结果。研究结果:2000-2010年无病例发生,2011 - 2015年2例,2016 - 2025年57例。所有人都有药物使用问题和注射毒品使用的记录。死亡原因为药物毒性(n = 36, 61.0%)或药物毒性与疾病联合(n = 23, 39.0%),其中非故意死亡占多数(n = 49, 83.1%)。58例最终给药方式为注射。在毒理学可查病例中(n = 52),游离吗啡浓度中位数为0.2 mg/l (0.0 ~ 3.7 mg/l), 6-乙酰吗啡34例(65.4%)。45例(86.5%)存在非海洛因的精神活性药物。在尸检的病例中,18例(56.3%)有严重的冠状动脉疾病,14例(43.8%)有心脏肥大,11例(34.4%)有替代性纤维化,表明过去有梗死。诊断为急性支气管肺炎5例(15.6%),慢性阻塞性肺疾病12例(37.5%)。结论:澳大利亚出现了使用海洛因的新的老年人口统计,并反映在过量死亡中。在2000年至2025年期间,全身性疾病造成了很大比例的死亡,毒理学与较年轻病例的生存时间较短一致。
{"title":"Clinical characteristics of heroin overdose deaths among older adults in Australia, 2000-2025.","authors":"Shane Darke, Johan Duflou, Michael Farrell, Julia Lappin, Amy Peacock","doi":"10.1111/add.70216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine: (1) the circumstances of death and case characteristics of heroin-related toxicity deaths aged ≥ 65 years in Australia, 2000-2025 and (2) the toxicological profile and major autopsy findings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study of fatal heroin overdose cases aged ≥65 years, 2000-2025.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia-wide.</p><p><strong>Cases: </strong>59 cases were identified (65-69 years: 37, ≥70 years: 22), 51 (86.4%) male.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Circumstances of death, toxicology, major autopsy findings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>No case occurred in the period 2000-2010, two between 2011 and 2015 and 57 between 2016 and 2025. All had documented histories of both substance use problems and injecting drug use. Cause of death was drug toxicity (n = 36, 61.0%) or combined drug toxicity and disease (n = 23, 39.0%), the majority being unintentional (n = 49, 83.1%). The final route of administration was by injection in 58 cases. Amongst cases in which toxicology was available for inspection (n = 52), the median free morphine concentration was 0.2 mg/l (0.0-3.7 mg/l), and 6-acetylmorphine was present in 34 (65.4%). Psychoactive drugs other than heroin were present in 45 (86.5%) cases. Of autopsied cases, 18 (56.3%) had severe coronary artery disease, 14 (43.8%) cardiomegaly and 11 (34.4%) replacement fibrosis, indicating a past infarct. Five cases (15.6%) were diagnosed with acute bronchopneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was detected in 12 (37.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A new senior demographic of people who use heroin has emerged in Australia and is being reflected in overdose deaths. Systemic disease contributed to a large proportion of deaths between 2000 and 2025, and the toxicology is consistent with shorter survival times compared with younger cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145290371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
We need more rigorous research on social media and substance use to move from association to causation. 我们需要对社交媒体和物质使用进行更严格的研究,从关联转向因果关系。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/add.70217
Alex M Russell, Jon-Patrick Allem
{"title":"We need more rigorous research on social media and substance use to move from association to causation.","authors":"Alex M Russell, Jon-Patrick Allem","doi":"10.1111/add.70217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70217","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145290401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does alcohol use and related harm differ based on the age of initiation to alcohol? Results from a prospective cohort study. 酒精的使用和相关危害是否因开始饮酒的年龄而异?来自前瞻性队列研究的结果。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/add.70183
Philip J Clare, Wing See Yuen, Alexandra Henderson, Kypros Kypri, Raimondo Bruno, Tim Slade, Delyse Hutchinson, Nyanda McBride, Monika Wodalowski, Jim McCambridge, Louisa Degenhardt, Veronica C Boland, Richard P Mattick, Amy Peacock

Background and aims: There is evidence to suggest that earlier initiation to alcohol increases the rate and severity of alcohol consumption. However, this often overlooks the fact that earlier initiation also means a longer drinking history. This paper estimated differences in patterns of alcohol use and harm across adolescence and early adulthood, allowing for the fact that the patterns over time may differ depending on the age at which initiation occurred.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Australia.

Participants: The Australian Parental Supply of Alcohol Longitudinal Study (APSALS), a cohort of n = 1906 adolescents recruited in adolescence (mean age 12.9) from 107 Australian schools and followed up until adulthood (11 annual waves total, 2010-2021).

Measurements: We defined age of initiation as the age at which alcohol consumption was first reported in the study. Our outcomes were amount of alcohol consumed, monthly heavy episodic drinking, alcohol-related harm and self-reported symptoms of alcohol use disorder in the years following initiation.

Findings: Those who initiated at age 12 had a lower risk of consumption [risk ratio (RR) 0.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.02] in the year following initiation (age 13), compared with those who initiated at age 18. Similarly, those who initiated at age 15 had a lower risk of alcohol use disorder in the year after initiation (RR 0.66; 95% CI = 0.52-0.83), compared with those who initiated at age 18. However, at age 20, those who initiated at age 12 showed higher consumption (RR 1.57; 95% CI = 1.18-2.09), monthly heavy episodic drinking (RR 1.24; 95% CI = 1.02-1.51) and alcohol-related harms [incidence-rate ratio (IRR) 1.73; 95% CI = 1.21-2.46] than those who initiated at age 18. Similar results were seen for symptoms consistent with DSM-IV alcohol dependence (RR 1.20; 95% CI = 1.05-1.38), DSM-IV alcohol abuse (RR 1.54; 95% CI = 1.04-2.29) and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (RR 1.36; 95% CI = 1.12-1.65). However, there was evidence of ageing out, with risk of heavy episodic drinking and alcohol-related harm peaking around age 20 and then declining, regardless of when initiation occurred.

Conclusions: Later initiation to alcohol appears to be associated with more rapid escalation in drinking and related harm, but lower 'peak' harm than earlier initiation. The findings support the current guidelines recommending adolescents avoid alcohol until adulthood, and reinforce the need for public health intervention targeting both children and parents.

背景和目的:有证据表明,较早开始饮酒会增加饮酒的比率和严重程度。然而,这往往忽略了一个事实,即更早的开始也意味着更长的饮酒史。这篇论文估计了青春期和成年早期的酒精使用模式和危害的差异,考虑到随着时间的推移,模式可能会因开始饮酒的年龄而有所不同。设计:前瞻性队列研究。设置:澳大利亚。参与者:澳大利亚父母酒精供应纵向研究(APSALS),从107所澳大利亚学校招募了n = 1906名青少年(平均年龄12.9岁),并随访至成年(2010-2021年共11次年度随访)。测量方法:我们将起始年龄定义为研究中首次报告饮酒的年龄。我们的结果是饮酒量、每月重度间歇性饮酒、酒精相关伤害和开始后几年自我报告的酒精使用障碍症状。研究结果:12岁开始饮酒的人饮酒风险较低[风险比(RR) 0.01;95%可信区间(CI) = 0.01-0.02],与那些在18岁开始的人相比,在13岁开始。同样,与18岁开始饮酒的人相比,15岁开始饮酒的人在开始饮酒后一年出现酒精使用障碍的风险较低(RR 0.66; 95% CI = 0.52-0.83)。然而,在20岁时,那些从12岁开始饮酒的人显示出更高的饮酒量(RR 1.57; 95% CI = 1.18-2.09),每月重度间歇性饮酒(RR 1.24; 95% CI = 1.02-1.51)和酒精相关危害[发病率比(IRR) 1.73;(95% CI = 1.21-2.46)比18岁开始服用的患者要好。与DSM-IV酒精依赖(RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.05-1.38)、DSM-IV酒精滥用(RR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.04-2.29)和DSM-5酒精使用障碍(RR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.12-1.65)相符的症状也出现了类似的结果。然而,有证据表明,随着年龄的增长,大量间歇性饮酒和酒精相关伤害的风险在20岁左右达到顶峰,然后下降,无论何时开始。结论:较晚开始饮酒似乎与饮酒和相关危害的快速升级有关,但“峰值”危害低于较早开始饮酒。研究结果支持了目前建议青少年在成年前避免饮酒的指导方针,并强调了针对儿童和父母进行公共卫生干预的必要性。
{"title":"Does alcohol use and related harm differ based on the age of initiation to alcohol? Results from a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Philip J Clare, Wing See Yuen, Alexandra Henderson, Kypros Kypri, Raimondo Bruno, Tim Slade, Delyse Hutchinson, Nyanda McBride, Monika Wodalowski, Jim McCambridge, Louisa Degenhardt, Veronica C Boland, Richard P Mattick, Amy Peacock","doi":"10.1111/add.70183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is evidence to suggest that earlier initiation to alcohol increases the rate and severity of alcohol consumption. However, this often overlooks the fact that earlier initiation also means a longer drinking history. This paper estimated differences in patterns of alcohol use and harm across adolescence and early adulthood, allowing for the fact that the patterns over time may differ depending on the age at which initiation occurred.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The Australian Parental Supply of Alcohol Longitudinal Study (APSALS), a cohort of n = 1906 adolescents recruited in adolescence (mean age 12.9) from 107 Australian schools and followed up until adulthood (11 annual waves total, 2010-2021).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We defined age of initiation as the age at which alcohol consumption was first reported in the study. Our outcomes were amount of alcohol consumed, monthly heavy episodic drinking, alcohol-related harm and self-reported symptoms of alcohol use disorder in the years following initiation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Those who initiated at age 12 had a lower risk of consumption [risk ratio (RR) 0.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.02] in the year following initiation (age 13), compared with those who initiated at age 18. Similarly, those who initiated at age 15 had a lower risk of alcohol use disorder in the year after initiation (RR 0.66; 95% CI = 0.52-0.83), compared with those who initiated at age 18. However, at age 20, those who initiated at age 12 showed higher consumption (RR 1.57; 95% CI = 1.18-2.09), monthly heavy episodic drinking (RR 1.24; 95% CI = 1.02-1.51) and alcohol-related harms [incidence-rate ratio (IRR) 1.73; 95% CI = 1.21-2.46] than those who initiated at age 18. Similar results were seen for symptoms consistent with DSM-IV alcohol dependence (RR 1.20; 95% CI = 1.05-1.38), DSM-IV alcohol abuse (RR 1.54; 95% CI = 1.04-2.29) and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (RR 1.36; 95% CI = 1.12-1.65). However, there was evidence of ageing out, with risk of heavy episodic drinking and alcohol-related harm peaking around age 20 and then declining, regardless of when initiation occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Later initiation to alcohol appears to be associated with more rapid escalation in drinking and related harm, but lower 'peak' harm than earlier initiation. The findings support the current guidelines recommending adolescents avoid alcohol until adulthood, and reinforce the need for public health intervention targeting both children and parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cannabis use measurement: Identifying the optimal metric for broad research applications. 大麻使用测量:确定广泛研究应用的最佳度量。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/add.70205
Carillon J Skrzynski, Raeghan L Mueller, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison

Background and aims: Cannabis legalization has increased product availability and use, subsequently necessitating efficient measurements of cannabis use that accurately reflect biomarkers of cannabis exposure (e.g. blood cannabinoid levels). The present study thus sought to compare cannabis use metrics and their associations with biomarkers and examine whether these associations were moderated by sex or age.

Design: Observational study using data from five larger studies.

Setting: Data collection and recruitment occurred in the greater Boulder/Denver metropolitan area in Colorado, USA.

Participants: Individuals (n = 1090, Mage = 32.89, SD = 12.97; 78.35% White; 51.56% female) included regular cannabis users (Muse = 16 days/past month and 4 times/day).

Measurements: Participants completed assessments of typical quantity and frequency of cannabis use via an in-house survey (Cannabis Quantity and Frequency Scale; CQFS) versus past month use via the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB). Cannabis biomarkers were also collected, including blood levels of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) after immediate use and baseline levels of the primary THC metabolite, 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) FINDINGS: Separate mixed effects models using TLFB versus CQFS cannabis metric predictors of the two biomarkers including moderators of sex and age resulted in higher adjusted R2 values for the CQFS versus TLFB model predicting THC-COOH (0.30 vs 0.27, respectively) and for the TLFB versus CQFS model predicting THC (0.24 vs 0.21, respectively). Additionally, greater CQFS total times of any cannabis/day (i.e. total times/day) was associated with increased THC-COOH [B = 5.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.66-11.03, P = 0.03] while it was associated with increased THC among males only (Binteraction = 7.80, 95% CI = 0.25-15.34, P = 0.04). TLFB days/month was statistically significantly, positively related with both THC-COOH and THC (B = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.00-3.79, P < 0.001 and B = 4.18, 95% CI = 0.98-7.38, P = 0.01, respectively) with no statistically significant interactions.

Conclusions: The Cannabis Quantity and Frequency Scale (CQFS) measurement of total times/day appears to be a better predictor of general cannabis use than the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) method. In contrast, TLFB appears to be better at predicting acute use of cannabis than the CQFS.

背景和目的:大麻合法化增加了产品的供应和使用,因此有必要对大麻使用情况进行有效测量,以准确反映大麻暴露的生物标志物(例如血液大麻素水平)。因此,本研究试图比较大麻使用指标及其与生物标志物的关联,并检查这些关联是否受性别或年龄的影响。设计:观察性研究,使用来自五个大型研究的数据。环境:数据收集和招聘发生在美国科罗拉多州的大博尔德/丹佛大都市区。参与者:个体(n = 1090, Mage = 32.89, SD = 12.97; 78.35%白人;51.56%女性)包括常规大麻使用者(Muse = 16天/过去一个月和4次/天)。测量:参与者通过内部调查(大麻数量和频率量表;CQFS)完成了对大麻使用的典型数量和频率的评估,通过时间轴跟踪(TLFB)对比过去一个月的使用情况。还收集了大麻生物标志物,包括立即使用后血液中δ -9四氢大麻酚(THC)的水平和THC主要代谢物- 11-不-9-羧基四氢大麻酚(THC- cooh)的基线水平。使用TLFB和CQFS两种生物标志物(包括性别和年龄调节因子)的大麻计量预测因子的单独混合效应模型导致CQFS和TLFB模型预测THC- cooh的调整R2值更高(分别为0.30和0.27),TLFB和CQFS模型预测THC的调整R2值更高(分别为0.24和0.21)。此外,任何大麻的CQFS总次数/天(即总次数/天)与THC- cooh的增加有关[B = 5.85, 95%可信区间(CI) = 0.66-11.03, P = 0.03],而仅与男性THC的增加有关(B交互作用= 7.80,95% CI = 0.25-15.34, P = 0.04)。TLFB天数/月与THC- cooh和THC呈正相关(B = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.00-3.79, P)结论:大麻数量和频率量表(CQFS)测量的总次数/天似乎比时间线追踪法(TLFB)更能预测一般大麻使用情况。相比之下,TLFB似乎比CQFS更能预测大麻的急性使用。
{"title":"Cannabis use measurement: Identifying the optimal metric for broad research applications.","authors":"Carillon J Skrzynski, Raeghan L Mueller, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison","doi":"10.1111/add.70205","DOIUrl":"10.1111/add.70205","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Cannabis legalization has increased product availability and use, subsequently necessitating efficient measurements of cannabis use that accurately reflect biomarkers of cannabis exposure (e.g. blood cannabinoid levels). The present study thus sought to compare cannabis use metrics and their associations with biomarkers and examine whether these associations were moderated by sex or age.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study using data from five larger studies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data collection and recruitment occurred in the greater Boulder/Denver metropolitan area in Colorado, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals (n = 1090, M<sub>age</sub> = 32.89, SD = 12.97; 78.35% White; 51.56% female) included regular cannabis users (M<sub>use</sub> = 16 days/past month and 4 times/day).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Participants completed assessments of typical quantity and frequency of cannabis use via an in-house survey (Cannabis Quantity and Frequency Scale; CQFS) versus past month use via the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB). Cannabis biomarkers were also collected, including blood levels of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) after immediate use and baseline levels of the primary THC metabolite, 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) FINDINGS: Separate mixed effects models using TLFB versus CQFS cannabis metric predictors of the two biomarkers including moderators of sex and age resulted in higher adjusted R<sup>2</sup> values for the CQFS versus TLFB model predicting THC-COOH (0.30 vs 0.27, respectively) and for the TLFB versus CQFS model predicting THC (0.24 vs 0.21, respectively). Additionally, greater CQFS total times of any cannabis/day (i.e. total times/day) was associated with increased THC-COOH [B = 5.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.66-11.03, P = 0.03] while it was associated with increased THC among males only (B<sub>interaction</sub> = 7.80, 95% CI = 0.25-15.34, P = 0.04). TLFB days/month was statistically significantly, positively related with both THC-COOH and THC (B = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.00-3.79, P < 0.001 and B = 4.18, 95% CI = 0.98-7.38, P = 0.01, respectively) with no statistically significant interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Cannabis Quantity and Frequency Scale (CQFS) measurement of total times/day appears to be a better predictor of general cannabis use than the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) method. In contrast, TLFB appears to be better at predicting acute use of cannabis than the CQFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12617289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145273273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring lifetime alcohol exposure: A scoping review and implications for translational research and alcohol-related harm. 测量终生酒精暴露:对转化研究和酒精相关危害的范围审查和影响。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/add.70208
Andrew J Palmer, Jason P Connor, Gerald Holtmann, John B Saunders, Katie Rice, Jeremy Yeo, Andrea Huang, Paul J Clark

Background and aims: Understanding lifetime alcohol exposure is fundamental to appreciating the risks of alcohol dependence and the multiplicity of alcohol-related harms, such as cirrhosis. However, most research relies on self-reported alcohol use measures that rarely extend beyond recent consumption. This represents a critical limitation in assessing the relationship between alcohol exposure and biological or psychological outcomes. Concerns about recall bias may be overstated and risk obstructing translational research into long-term effects of alcohol, including treatment engagement. This scoping review examined the evidence for the reliability and validity of self-reported measures of lifetime alcohol consumption.

Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases in June 2024 for English-language articles published since 1970. We included studies that performed at least one of the following psychometric assessments on a lifetime alcohol exposure measure: test-retest reliability, internal consistency, concurrent validity or construct validity.

Results: The search identified 1607 unique records. After title and abstract screening, 24 studies underwent full-text review, with nine meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in North America (78%). The most frequently used instrument was the Lifetime Drinking History (LDH) (67%). Across all studies, there were 6010 participants (3478 male, 2532 female), with sample sizes ranging from 49 to 3255. In 78% of studies, alcohol exposure data were collected via face-to-face interview. Eight studies assessed test-retest reliability, with retest intervals ranging from 14 days to 13 years; none assessed internal consistency. Three studies (33%) formally assessed validity. Where assessed, test-retest reliability and concurrent and construct validity were moderate to strong. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.92, and concurrent and construct validity with external reference measures ranged from 0.40 to 0.80, indicating generally acceptable performance.

Conclusions: Existing instruments for measuring lifetime alcohol exposure appear to be valid and reliable and can overcome concerns regarding biases; however, these instruments vary in structure, lack standardisation and may fail to capture binge or episodic drinking, highlighting important gaps for refinement.

背景和目的:了解终生酒精暴露是认识酒精依赖风险和酒精相关危害(如肝硬化)的基础。然而,大多数研究依赖于自我报告的酒精使用测量,很少超出最近的消费。这是评估酒精暴露与生物或心理结果之间关系的一个关键限制。对回忆偏倚的担忧可能被夸大了,并有可能阻碍对酒精长期影响的转化研究,包括治疗参与。本综述检查了终生酒精消费量自我报告测量的可靠性和有效性的证据。方法:我们于2024年6月检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和PsycINFO数据库中1970年以来发表的英文文章。我们纳入了对终身酒精暴露测量进行以下至少一项心理测量评估的研究:重测信度、内部一致性、并发效度或结构效度。结果:搜索确定了1607条唯一记录。在标题和摘要筛选后,24项研究进行了全文审查,其中9项符合纳入标准。大多数研究在北美进行(78%)。使用最多的仪器是终生饮酒史(LDH)(67%)。在所有研究中,共有6010名参与者(3478名男性,2532名女性),样本量从49到3255不等。在78%的研究中,酒精暴露数据是通过面对面访谈收集的。8项研究评估了重测信度,重测间隔从14天到13年不等;没有评估内部一致性。三项研究(33%)正式评估了效度。在评估中,重测信度、并发效度和构念效度均为中至强。重测信度范围为0.67 ~ 0.92,与外部参考测量的并发效度和构念效度范围为0.40 ~ 0.80,总体上可以接受。结论:用于测量终生酒精暴露的现有仪器似乎是有效和可靠的,并且可以克服对偏差的担忧;然而,这些工具在结构上各不相同,缺乏标准化,可能无法捕获狂欢或间歇性饮酒,突出了改进的重要差距。
{"title":"Measuring lifetime alcohol exposure: A scoping review and implications for translational research and alcohol-related harm.","authors":"Andrew J Palmer, Jason P Connor, Gerald Holtmann, John B Saunders, Katie Rice, Jeremy Yeo, Andrea Huang, Paul J Clark","doi":"10.1111/add.70208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Understanding lifetime alcohol exposure is fundamental to appreciating the risks of alcohol dependence and the multiplicity of alcohol-related harms, such as cirrhosis. However, most research relies on self-reported alcohol use measures that rarely extend beyond recent consumption. This represents a critical limitation in assessing the relationship between alcohol exposure and biological or psychological outcomes. Concerns about recall bias may be overstated and risk obstructing translational research into long-term effects of alcohol, including treatment engagement. This scoping review examined the evidence for the reliability and validity of self-reported measures of lifetime alcohol consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases in June 2024 for English-language articles published since 1970. We included studies that performed at least one of the following psychometric assessments on a lifetime alcohol exposure measure: test-retest reliability, internal consistency, concurrent validity or construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1607 unique records. After title and abstract screening, 24 studies underwent full-text review, with nine meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in North America (78%). The most frequently used instrument was the Lifetime Drinking History (LDH) (67%). Across all studies, there were 6010 participants (3478 male, 2532 female), with sample sizes ranging from 49 to 3255. In 78% of studies, alcohol exposure data were collected via face-to-face interview. Eight studies assessed test-retest reliability, with retest intervals ranging from 14 days to 13 years; none assessed internal consistency. Three studies (33%) formally assessed validity. Where assessed, test-retest reliability and concurrent and construct validity were moderate to strong. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.92, and concurrent and construct validity with external reference measures ranged from 0.40 to 0.80, indicating generally acceptable performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing instruments for measuring lifetime alcohol exposure appear to be valid and reliable and can overcome concerns regarding biases; however, these instruments vary in structure, lack standardisation and may fail to capture binge or episodic drinking, highlighting important gaps for refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145273286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency department presentations, hospitalisations and police seizure data related to gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in New South Wales, Australia, from 2015 to 2024. 2015年至2024年澳大利亚新南威尔士州与γ -羟基丁酸盐(GHB)相关的急诊科报告、住院和警方缉获数据。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1111/add.70202
Krista J Siefried, Janette L Smith, Christine A Harvey, Anthony Nedanoski, Jared A Brown, Una Cullinan, Nadine Ezard, Thanjira Jiranantakan, Darren M Roberts, Jonathan Brett

Background and aims: Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is an endogenous neurochemical and illicit synthetic drug. Its precursors, gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD), are often used as substitutes. We aimed to describe GHB-related harms in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

Design, setting and cases: Descriptive epidemiological study of data from three administrative datasets: emergency department (ED) presentations from 88 hospitals (1 July 2015 to 31 January 2024 - the latest available), admitted patient data from all NSW hospitals (1 July 2015 to 30 June 2023) and a subset of NSW Police Force seizure data. Note: analysis was not undertaken, data are presented descriptively.

Measurements: ED presentations and hospitalisations were analysed for GHB-related presentations and admissions including severity of presentation, intubation and intensive care. NSW Police Force seizure data were examined for all analytically confirmed samples of GHB, GBL and 1,4-BD to assess trends over time.

Findings: Over the study period, there were 9612 GHB-related ED presentations. Between July 2023 and January 2024, this was 101 per 100 000 unplanned presentations, relative to the previous full-year peak of 73.7 per 100 000 in 2022-2023 and the 2015-2016 rate of 24.9 per 100 000. The majority (56.1%) were assessed as Australian Triage Category 1 or 2, indicating the highest level of need. ED presentations in regional or remote areas accounted for 13.8% of all presentations in the most recent data, relative to 3.4% at the start of the study period. Hospitalisations totalled 6420 episodes, peaking at 19.6 per 100 000 population in 2020-2021. Nearly one in five patients required intubation, and a similar proportion required admission to intensive care. There was a trend of women accounting for a larger proportion of ED presentations and hospitalisations over time. GHB accounted for 0.1% of all police seizures analysed, and showed a shift from GBL to 1,4-BD dominance from 2022 onwards.

Conclusions: Gamma-hydroxybutyrate-related emergency department presentations and hospitalisations in New South Wales, Australia, appear to have increased over the period from 2015 to 2024, which can support public health campaigns to reduce gamma-hydroxybutyrate-related harms.

背景与目的:γ -羟基丁酸酯(GHB)是一种内源性神经化学药物,是一种非法合成药物。其前体γ -丁内酯(GBL)和1,4-丁二醇(1,4- bd)常被用作替代品。我们旨在描述澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)与ghb相关的危害。设计、环境和病例:对来自三个行政数据集的数据进行描述性流行病学研究:来自88家医院的急诊科(ED)报告(2015年7月1日至2024年1月31日——最新可用数据)、来自所有新南威尔士州医院的住院患者数据(2015年7月1日至2023年6月30日)和新南威尔士州警察部队扣押数据的子集。注:未进行分析,数据是描述性的。测量方法:分析与ghb相关的ED表现和住院情况,包括表现的严重程度、插管和重症监护。对所有经分析确认的GHB、GBL和1,4- bd样本的新南威尔士州警察部队缉获数据进行了检查,以评估随时间推移的趋势。结果:在研究期间,有9612例与ghb相关的ED表现。在2023年7月至2024年1月期间,这一比例为101 / 10万,而此前2022-2023年全年峰值为73.7 / 10万,2015-2016年为24.9 / 10万。大多数(56.1%)被评估为澳大利亚分诊分类1类或2类,表明需求最高。在最新数据中,区域或偏远地区的ED报告占所有报告的13.8%,而在研究开始时为3.4%。住院总次数为6420次,在2020-2021年达到每10万人19.6次的峰值。近五分之一的患者需要插管,相似比例的患者需要住院重症监护。随着时间的推移,女性在急诊科和住院治疗中所占的比例越来越大。GHB占所有警方缉获量的0.1%,并显示从2022年起,GBL的主导地位从GBL转变为1,4- bd。结论:2015年至2024年期间,澳大利亚新南威尔士州与γ -羟基丁酸酯相关的急诊科就诊和住院人数似乎有所增加,这可以支持公共卫生运动,以减少γ -羟基丁酸酯相关的危害。
{"title":"Emergency department presentations, hospitalisations and police seizure data related to gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in New South Wales, Australia, from 2015 to 2024.","authors":"Krista J Siefried, Janette L Smith, Christine A Harvey, Anthony Nedanoski, Jared A Brown, Una Cullinan, Nadine Ezard, Thanjira Jiranantakan, Darren M Roberts, Jonathan Brett","doi":"10.1111/add.70202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is an endogenous neurochemical and illicit synthetic drug. Its precursors, gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD), are often used as substitutes. We aimed to describe GHB-related harms in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and cases: </strong>Descriptive epidemiological study of data from three administrative datasets: emergency department (ED) presentations from 88 hospitals (1 July 2015 to 31 January 2024 - the latest available), admitted patient data from all NSW hospitals (1 July 2015 to 30 June 2023) and a subset of NSW Police Force seizure data. Note: analysis was not undertaken, data are presented descriptively.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>ED presentations and hospitalisations were analysed for GHB-related presentations and admissions including severity of presentation, intubation and intensive care. NSW Police Force seizure data were examined for all analytically confirmed samples of GHB, GBL and 1,4-BD to assess trends over time.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Over the study period, there were 9612 GHB-related ED presentations. Between July 2023 and January 2024, this was 101 per 100 000 unplanned presentations, relative to the previous full-year peak of 73.7 per 100 000 in 2022-2023 and the 2015-2016 rate of 24.9 per 100 000. The majority (56.1%) were assessed as Australian Triage Category 1 or 2, indicating the highest level of need. ED presentations in regional or remote areas accounted for 13.8% of all presentations in the most recent data, relative to 3.4% at the start of the study period. Hospitalisations totalled 6420 episodes, peaking at 19.6 per 100 000 population in 2020-2021. Nearly one in five patients required intubation, and a similar proportion required admission to intensive care. There was a trend of women accounting for a larger proportion of ED presentations and hospitalisations over time. GHB accounted for 0.1% of all police seizures analysed, and showed a shift from GBL to 1,4-BD dominance from 2022 onwards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gamma-hydroxybutyrate-related emergency department presentations and hospitalisations in New South Wales, Australia, appear to have increased over the period from 2015 to 2024, which can support public health campaigns to reduce gamma-hydroxybutyrate-related harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145249063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heat exposure and drug overdose mortality in the USA. 热暴露和药物过量死亡率在美国。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/add.70191
Julia M Dennett, Daniel Carrión, David A Fiellin, Gregg S Gonsalves

Background and aims: Understanding the relationship between heat and drug overdose mortality is critical given the ongoing overdose crisis and rising global temperatures driven by climate change. Evidence from local jurisdictions in the United States (US) and Canada indicates that exposure to heat is associated with increased drug overdose fatalities, but the widespread impact of heat on national drug overdose deaths is undetermined. We aimed to determine the effect of heat exposure on drug overdose mortality in the US.

Design: An observational study using monthly, county-level data from 1999 to 2020 and a fixed effect model estimated with linear regression. The model accounts for time-invariant county-month factors and state-level time-specific shocks.

Setting: All counties in the continental US during the months of June to September from 1999 to 2020.

Participants: Decedents in the National Center for Health Statistics restricted Vital Statistics mortality data with a cause of death of a drug overdose, aggregated to county-level mortality rates.

Measurements: All drug overdose mortality rate per 100 000 population. The monthly average maximum heat index (measured in degrees Celsius) was collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network.

Findings: A one-degree Celsius increase in the heat index was associated with an increase in all drug overdose mortality by 0.0098 deaths per 100 000 population [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.0057-0.014, P < 0.001], with significant effects for deaths related to opioids (0.0060 deaths, 95% CI = 0.0026-0.0095, P < 0.001), cocaine (0.0028 deaths, 95% CI = 0.0012-0.0045, P < 0.001) and psychostimulants (0.0028 deaths, 95% CI = 0.0015-0.0041, P < 0.001). In further analyses, larger impacts were observed after 2013, in counties with greater levels of social vulnerability and in suburban and urban counties. Estimates suggest that approximately 150 excess drug overdose deaths occurred per year during the hottest periods due to heat exposure.

Conclusions: Exposure to heat appears to be associated with increases in drug overdose deaths in the United States in recent decades.

背景和目的:考虑到持续的药物过量危机和气候变化导致的全球气温上升,了解热量与药物过量死亡率之间的关系至关重要。来自美国和加拿大地方司法管辖区的证据表明,暴露于高温与药物过量死亡人数增加有关,但高温对国家药物过量死亡人数的广泛影响尚不确定。我们的目的是确定热暴露对美国药物过量死亡率的影响。设计:一项观察性研究,使用1999年至2020年每月县级数据和线性回归估计的固定效应模型。该模型考虑了时间不变的县月因素和州级特定时间的冲击。背景:1999年至2020年6月至9月期间美国大陆的所有县。参与者:国家卫生统计中心的死者限制了生命统计死亡率数据,死因是药物过量,汇总到县级死亡率。测量:每10万人中所有药物过量死亡率。月平均最高热指数(以摄氏度计)是从疾病控制和预防中心国家环境公共卫生跟踪网络收集的。研究结果:高温指数每升高1摄氏度,所有药物过量死亡率就会增加0.0098 / 10万人[95%置信区间(CI) = 0.0057-0.014, P]。结论:近几十年来,暴露在高温下似乎与美国药物过量死亡率的增加有关。
{"title":"Heat exposure and drug overdose mortality in the USA.","authors":"Julia M Dennett, Daniel Carrión, David A Fiellin, Gregg S Gonsalves","doi":"10.1111/add.70191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Understanding the relationship between heat and drug overdose mortality is critical given the ongoing overdose crisis and rising global temperatures driven by climate change. Evidence from local jurisdictions in the United States (US) and Canada indicates that exposure to heat is associated with increased drug overdose fatalities, but the widespread impact of heat on national drug overdose deaths is undetermined. We aimed to determine the effect of heat exposure on drug overdose mortality in the US.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study using monthly, county-level data from 1999 to 2020 and a fixed effect model estimated with linear regression. The model accounts for time-invariant county-month factors and state-level time-specific shocks.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All counties in the continental US during the months of June to September from 1999 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Decedents in the National Center for Health Statistics restricted Vital Statistics mortality data with a cause of death of a drug overdose, aggregated to county-level mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>All drug overdose mortality rate per 100 000 population. The monthly average maximum heat index (measured in degrees Celsius) was collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A one-degree Celsius increase in the heat index was associated with an increase in all drug overdose mortality by 0.0098 deaths per 100 000 population [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.0057-0.014, P < 0.001], with significant effects for deaths related to opioids (0.0060 deaths, 95% CI = 0.0026-0.0095, P < 0.001), cocaine (0.0028 deaths, 95% CI = 0.0012-0.0045, P < 0.001) and psychostimulants (0.0028 deaths, 95% CI = 0.0015-0.0041, P < 0.001). In further analyses, larger impacts were observed after 2013, in counties with greater levels of social vulnerability and in suburban and urban counties. Estimates suggest that approximately 150 excess drug overdose deaths occurred per year during the hottest periods due to heat exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exposure to heat appears to be associated with increases in drug overdose deaths in the United States in recent decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
OK Boomer: A longitudinal analysis unravelling generational cohort differences in alcohol consumption among Australians. OK Boomer:一项纵向分析,揭示了澳大利亚人饮酒量的代际差异。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI: 10.1111/add.70201
Gianluca Di Censo, Kirrilly Thompson, Murthy Mittinty, Jacqueline Bowden

Background and aims: Alcohol consumption is a key preventable cause of disease and injury worldwide. Recent evidence suggests that younger generations may be consuming less alcohol. However, it is still uncertain whether this trend is temporary or indicative of an enduring generational shift. This study sought to determine whether there are generational differences in alcohol consumption in Australia, while accounting for age and other sociodemographic factors.

Design and setting: The analysis used data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey.

Participants: The analysis included 23 368 participants (51.9% female) across 23 waves of data. Participants were classified into different generational cohorts according to Pew Research Centre definitions: Silent Generation (1928-1945), Baby Boomers (1946-1964), Generation X (1965-1980), Millennials (1981-1996) and Generation Z (1997-2012).

Measurements: The study included three outcome measures: 1) abstention; 2) typical alcohol consumption per drinking occasion; and 3) typical weekly alcohol consumption.

Findings: Although the likelihood of abstaining from alcohol consumption increased with age, Generation Z [odds ratio (OR) = 17.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 13.22-23.80, P < 0.001], Millennials (OR = 9.67, 95% CI = 7.98-11.71, P < 0.001) and Generation X (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 2.75-3.92, P < 0.001) exhibited increased odds of abstention when compared with Baby Boomers, while the Silent Generation demonstrated decreased odds (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.41, P < 0.001). Among drinkers, the quantity of per-occasion alcohol consumption reached its peak in early adulthood. Millennials (β = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.44-0.60, P < 0.001) and Generation X (β = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.32-0.47, P < 0.001) self-reported a significantly higher quantity of per-occasion alcohol consumption compared with Baby Boomers, while Generation Z did not significantly differ (β = 0.10, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.23, P = 0.106) and the Silent Generation consumed significantly less (β = -0.21, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.11, P < 0.001). Weekly quantity of alcohol consumption among drinkers peaked in early adulthood and midlife, with the Silent Generation [exp(β) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.09-1.23, P < 0.001] exhibiting the highest levels of consumption, while Generation Z [exp(β) = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.53-0.62, P < 0.001] and Millennials [exp(β) = 0.77, 95% CI = [0.73-0.81, P < 0.001] demonstrated the lowest (compared to Baby Boomers).

Conclusions: In Australia, there appear to be generational differences in alcohol consumption, including an increase in abstention and an overall reduction in alcohol consumption among Generation Z compared with previous generations.

背景和目的:在世界范围内,酒精消费是导致疾病和伤害的一个可预防的主要原因。最近的证据表明,年轻一代可能正在减少饮酒量。然而,目前还不确定这种趋势是暂时的,还是表明了持续的代际变化。这项研究试图确定在澳大利亚饮酒是否存在代际差异,同时考虑到年龄和其他社会人口因素。设计和环境:分析使用了澳大利亚家庭收入和劳动力动态(HILDA)调查的数据。参与者:分析包括23波数据中的23368名参与者(51.9%为女性)。根据皮尤研究中心的定义,参与者被划分为不同的世代:沉默的一代(1928-1945)、婴儿潮一代(1946-1964)、X一代(1965-1980)、千禧一代(1981-1996)和Z一代(1997-2012)。测量方法:本研究包括三个结果测量方法:1)戒酒;2)每次饮酒场合的典型饮酒量;3)典型的每周饮酒量。研究结果:尽管Z世代戒酒的可能性随着年龄的增长而增加,但比值比(OR) = 17.74, 95%可信区间(CI) = 13.22-23.80, P结论:在澳大利亚,与前几代人相比,Z世代的酒精消费似乎存在代际差异,包括戒酒的增加和酒精消费的总体减少。
{"title":"OK Boomer: A longitudinal analysis unravelling generational cohort differences in alcohol consumption among Australians.","authors":"Gianluca Di Censo, Kirrilly Thompson, Murthy Mittinty, Jacqueline Bowden","doi":"10.1111/add.70201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Alcohol consumption is a key preventable cause of disease and injury worldwide. Recent evidence suggests that younger generations may be consuming less alcohol. However, it is still uncertain whether this trend is temporary or indicative of an enduring generational shift. This study sought to determine whether there are generational differences in alcohol consumption in Australia, while accounting for age and other sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The analysis used data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The analysis included 23 368 participants (51.9% female) across 23 waves of data. Participants were classified into different generational cohorts according to Pew Research Centre definitions: Silent Generation (1928-1945), Baby Boomers (1946-1964), Generation X (1965-1980), Millennials (1981-1996) and Generation Z (1997-2012).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The study included three outcome measures: 1) abstention; 2) typical alcohol consumption per drinking occasion; and 3) typical weekly alcohol consumption.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Although the likelihood of abstaining from alcohol consumption increased with age, Generation Z [odds ratio (OR) = 17.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 13.22-23.80, P < 0.001], Millennials (OR = 9.67, 95% CI = 7.98-11.71, P < 0.001) and Generation X (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 2.75-3.92, P < 0.001) exhibited increased odds of abstention when compared with Baby Boomers, while the Silent Generation demonstrated decreased odds (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.41, P < 0.001). Among drinkers, the quantity of per-occasion alcohol consumption reached its peak in early adulthood. Millennials (β = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.44-0.60, P < 0.001) and Generation X (β = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.32-0.47, P < 0.001) self-reported a significantly higher quantity of per-occasion alcohol consumption compared with Baby Boomers, while Generation Z did not significantly differ (β = 0.10, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.23, P = 0.106) and the Silent Generation consumed significantly less (β = -0.21, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.11, P < 0.001). Weekly quantity of alcohol consumption among drinkers peaked in early adulthood and midlife, with the Silent Generation [exp(β) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.09-1.23, P < 0.001] exhibiting the highest levels of consumption, while Generation Z [exp(β) = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.53-0.62, P < 0.001] and Millennials [exp(β) = 0.77, 95% CI = [0.73-0.81, P < 0.001] demonstrated the lowest (compared to Baby Boomers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Australia, there appear to be generational differences in alcohol consumption, including an increase in abstention and an overall reduction in alcohol consumption among Generation Z compared with previous generations.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145211097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cigarette smoking across life from 1946 to 2018: Harmonisation of four British birth cohort studies. 从1946年到2018年的一生中吸烟:四项英国出生队列研究的协调。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI: 10.1111/add.70204
Liam Wright, Loren Kock, Harry Tattan-Birch, David Bann

Background and aims: Tobacco smoking has declined dramatically in many high-income countries over the past seventy years. Studies that have mapped this trend have relied on repeat cross-sectional or retrospectively measured smoking data, which have limitations regarding accurate measurement, inclusion of early smokers, and capturing of within-person change over time. Here, we introduce a new resource detailing harmonisable smoking data in four British birth cohort studies spanning 1946-2018 and use these data to document age and cohort changes in smoking.

Design: Longitudinal data from four nationally representative British Birth Cohort Studies, born 1946, 1958, 1970 and 2000/02, respectively.

Setting: Great Britain.

Participants: 50 942 participants were eligible for inclusion in this study (5362 in the 1946c, 16 178 in the 1958c, 16 036 in the 1970c, and 13 366 in the 2001c). Data collection spanned the years 1946-2018.

Measurements: Prevalence of daily smoking and cigarettes smoked per day were measured prospectively at various points across the life course via self-report.

Findings: The prevalence of smoking and the average number of cigarettes smoked by daily smokers declined between each successive cohort. At age 42/43y, prevalence of daily smoking was 33.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.8%, 35.5%) in the 1946c, 27.3% (95% CI = 26.5%, 28.2%) in the 1958c, and 22.1% (95% CI = 21.3%, 22.8%) in the 1970c. Males smoked more and with greater intensity than females, on average, though sex differences were smaller in latter cohorts. Within a cohort, the prevalence and intensity of smoking peaked in early adulthood (< age 30y) and declined thereafter; participants who continued to smoke daily smoked fewer cigarettes as they grew older.

Conclusions: In Great Britain, smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption appear to have declined substantially between cohorts born across the latter half of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The British Birth Cohorts represent a unique and largely underutilized resource for investigating trends in smoking across life (prenatal to old age) and by year of birth (1946-2001), including changes in the determinants, correlates, and consequences of smoking. We provide syntax and information on items on smoking in these cohorts to catalyse future research, also available at: https://cls-data.github.io/smoking-in-the-cohorts/.

背景和目的:过去七十年来,许多高收入国家的吸烟率急剧下降。绘制这一趋势的研究依赖于重复的横断面或回顾性测量的吸烟数据,这些数据在准确测量、纳入早期吸烟者和捕捉人体内随时间变化方面存在局限性。在这里,我们引入了一个新的资源,详细介绍了1946年至2018年期间英国四项出生队列研究中的协调吸烟数据,并使用这些数据来记录吸烟的年龄和队列变化。设计:纵向数据来自四个具有全国代表性的英国出生队列研究,分别出生于1946年、1958年、1970年和2000/02年。背景:英国。参与者:50942名参与者符合纳入本研究的条件(1946年5362人,1958年16178人,1970年16036人,2001年13366人)。数据收集时间跨度为1946年至2018年。测量方法:通过自我报告,在生命历程的不同阶段前瞻性地测量每日吸烟和每日吸烟的流行程度。研究结果:在每个连续的队列中,吸烟的流行程度和每日吸烟者的平均吸烟数量都有所下降。在42/43岁年龄段,每日吸烟率在1946年为33.6%(95%可信区间[CI] = 31.8%, 35.5%),在1958年为27.3% (95% CI = 26.5%, 28.2%),在1970年为22.1% (95% CI = 21.3%, 22.8%)。平均而言,男性比女性吸烟更多,吸烟强度也更大,尽管在后一组中,性别差异较小。在一个队列中,吸烟的患病率和强度在成年早期(< 30岁)达到顶峰,此后下降;随着年龄的增长,每天继续吸烟的参与者抽的烟也越来越少。结论:在英国,20世纪下半叶和21世纪初出生的人群中,吸烟率和香烟消费量似乎大幅下降。英国出生队列是一种独特的,但在很大程度上未被充分利用的资源,用于调查整个生命周期(产前至老年)和出生年份(1946-2001)的吸烟趋势,包括吸烟的决定因素、相关因素和后果的变化。我们在这些队列中提供有关吸烟项目的语法和信息,以促进未来的研究,也可在https://cls-data.github.io/smoking-in-the-cohorts/上获得。
{"title":"Cigarette smoking across life from 1946 to 2018: Harmonisation of four British birth cohort studies.","authors":"Liam Wright, Loren Kock, Harry Tattan-Birch, David Bann","doi":"10.1111/add.70204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Tobacco smoking has declined dramatically in many high-income countries over the past seventy years. Studies that have mapped this trend have relied on repeat cross-sectional or retrospectively measured smoking data, which have limitations regarding accurate measurement, inclusion of early smokers, and capturing of within-person change over time. Here, we introduce a new resource detailing harmonisable smoking data in four British birth cohort studies spanning 1946-2018 and use these data to document age and cohort changes in smoking.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal data from four nationally representative British Birth Cohort Studies, born 1946, 1958, 1970 and 2000/02, respectively.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Great Britain.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>50 942 participants were eligible for inclusion in this study (5362 in the 1946c, 16 178 in the 1958c, 16 036 in the 1970c, and 13 366 in the 2001c). Data collection spanned the years 1946-2018.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Prevalence of daily smoking and cigarettes smoked per day were measured prospectively at various points across the life course via self-report.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The prevalence of smoking and the average number of cigarettes smoked by daily smokers declined between each successive cohort. At age 42/43y, prevalence of daily smoking was 33.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.8%, 35.5%) in the 1946c, 27.3% (95% CI = 26.5%, 28.2%) in the 1958c, and 22.1% (95% CI = 21.3%, 22.8%) in the 1970c. Males smoked more and with greater intensity than females, on average, though sex differences were smaller in latter cohorts. Within a cohort, the prevalence and intensity of smoking peaked in early adulthood (< age 30y) and declined thereafter; participants who continued to smoke daily smoked fewer cigarettes as they grew older.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Great Britain, smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption appear to have declined substantially between cohorts born across the latter half of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The British Birth Cohorts represent a unique and largely underutilized resource for investigating trends in smoking across life (prenatal to old age) and by year of birth (1946-2001), including changes in the determinants, correlates, and consequences of smoking. We provide syntax and information on items on smoking in these cohorts to catalyse future research, also available at: https://cls-data.github.io/smoking-in-the-cohorts/.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145205114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deaths of despair: A reply to Darke et al. 绝望的死亡:对Darke等人的回应。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/add.70203
James P. Higham

At a time when extensive societal and public health reform is needed to address the factors driving ‘deaths of despair’ in the United Kingdom, the term seems more relevant than ever [1].

Deaths of despair in England, particularly drug- and alcohol-related deaths in males [2], have continued to increase in incidence since the turn of the century (with similar patterns evident in other parts of the United Kingdom). The age-standardised mortality rates attributed to drugs, alcohol and suicide robustly covary across the regions of England (Figure 1). This suggests that the social context in which these deaths occur is important and, as with other health outcomes, indicates that they might have some shared risk factors. It is also apparent that the risk of suicide is greater in those with substance use disorder [3]. Although there are several distinct individual risk factors for drug-, alcohol- and suicide-related deaths, shared risk factors do indeed play a key role [4]. Shared risk factors include unemployment or employment in elementary occupations, living alone, living in the North of England and being middle-aged and of white British ethnicity [4]. In line with this, Figure 1 shows that, across the regions of England, deaths of despair covary with income, economic inactivity and household deprivation. This is not to say that any one of these factors directly causes deaths of despair, rather, this serves to highlight that social context—made up of multiple, intertwined factors—should not be ignored when considering deaths of despair. These causes of death, therefore, appear not to be entirely disparate phenomena because they have shared social determinants [5, 6]. This is in broad alignment with data from the United States, where social isolation and unemployment, which vary by region, are associated with deaths of despair [7].

Withdrawal from the labour force, deprivation and social isolation can, directly or indirectly, lead to increased risk of mental ill health, such as depression and anxiety, as well as substance misuse [8-10]. This, in turn, can lead to diseases of despair, such as suicidal ideation or addiction to, or dependence on, alcohol or illicit drugs, and, eventually, death of despair. In this regard, diseases of despair follow a similar chronic time course, with death often occurring after prolonged mental illness or misuse of drugs or alcohol (or a combination of these). An individual's response to the societal factors which drive despair is likely to determine their risk of disease and death of despair. Similarly, it is clear that the social environment in which an individual experiences personal risk factors plays a role in determining their risk of death of despair [6]. This indicates a complex interaction between personal and societal factors, which are difficult to disentwine. A greater und

在需要进行广泛的社会和公共卫生改革以解决导致英国“绝望死亡”的因素的时候,这个词似乎比以往任何时候都更有意义。自世纪之交以来,英格兰绝望死亡,特别是与毒品和酒精有关的男性死亡的发生率继续增加(在联合王国的其他地区也有明显的类似模式)。毒品、酒精和自杀导致的年龄标准化死亡率在英格兰各地区之间存在显著的共同变化(图1)。这表明,这些死亡发生的社会背景很重要,并且与其他健康结果一样,表明它们可能有一些共同的风险因素。同样明显的是,那些有物质使用障碍的人自杀的风险更大。虽然与毒品、酒精和自杀相关的死亡有几个不同的个体风险因素,但共同的风险因素确实起着关键作用。共同的风险因素包括失业或从事初级职业、独居、居住在英格兰北部、中年和英国白人。与此相一致的是,图1显示,在英格兰各地区,绝望死亡与收入、不从事经济活动和家庭贫困相关。这并不是说这些因素中的任何一个直接导致绝望死亡,相反,这是为了强调,在考虑绝望死亡时,不应忽视由多个相互交织的因素组成的社会背景。因此,这些死亡原因似乎不是完全不同的现象,因为它们具有共同的社会决定因素[5,6]。这与美国的数据大体一致,在美国,社会孤立和失业(因地区而异)与绝望死亡有关。退出劳动力市场、贫困和社会孤立可直接或间接导致精神疾病风险增加,如抑郁和焦虑,以及药物滥用[8-10]。这反过来又可能导致绝望疾病,例如自杀意念或对酒精或非法药物成瘾或依赖,并最终导致绝望死亡。在这方面,绝望疾病遵循类似的慢性时间过程,死亡往往发生在长期精神疾病或滥用药物或酒精(或两者兼而有之)之后。个人对导致绝望的社会因素的反应可能决定他们患病和因绝望而死亡的风险。同样,很明显,个人经历个人风险因素的社会环境在决定其绝望死亡风险方面发挥着作用。这表明个人因素和社会因素之间存在复杂的相互作用,很难加以区分。需要更好地了解这些风险因素及其相互作用,才能充分认识绝望的后果,更好地确定处于危险中的人,并确定减少风险的方法。正如Darke等人正确地指出的那样,认为与毒品、酒精和自杀相关的死亡是由单一的、共同的风险因素造成的,这是错误的,人们不应该低估每种死亡原因的独特复杂性。“绝望死亡”一词旨在强调这些死亡的重叠性和多面性,这些死亡是由于个人和社会因素造成的,以及应对其发病率上升所需的综合政策。它强调了减少这些死亡原因所必需的整体办法。毫无疑问,减少与毒品、酒精和自杀有关的死亡无疑需要具体的政策,例如阿片类药物替代疗法和为阿片类药物依赖者分发纳洛酮。也就是说,正如麦格雷戈等人所指出的那样,更广泛的社会变革,也许是根据地区量身定制的,对于防止绝望及其深远的后果至关重要,从而减少高危人口,帮助那些受影响的人恢复。这种改变可以侧重于通过社区、工作或教育来增加风险群体的社会资本[14,15];健全的社会安全网;以及获得可靠的医疗服务,如咨询、支持团体或药物干预,这可能会阻止绝望驱动的行为。詹姆斯·p·海厄姆:概念化;原创作品草案;写作-审查和编辑。作者声明,他们没有利益冲突,经济或其他方面。这封信中使用的数据是公开的,可以通过下图中的链接找到。
{"title":"Deaths of despair: A reply to Darke et al.","authors":"James P. Higham","doi":"10.1111/add.70203","DOIUrl":"10.1111/add.70203","url":null,"abstract":"<p>At a time when extensive societal and public health reform is needed to address the factors driving ‘deaths of despair’ in the United Kingdom, the term seems more relevant than ever [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Deaths of despair in England, particularly drug- and alcohol-related deaths in males [<span>2</span>], have continued to increase in incidence since the turn of the century (with similar patterns evident in other parts of the United Kingdom). The age-standardised mortality rates attributed to drugs, alcohol and suicide robustly covary across the regions of England (Figure 1). This suggests that the social context in which these deaths occur is important and, as with other health outcomes, indicates that they might have some shared risk factors. It is also apparent that the risk of suicide is greater in those with substance use disorder [<span>3</span>]. Although there are several distinct individual risk factors for drug-, alcohol- and suicide-related deaths, shared risk factors do indeed play a key role [<span>4</span>]. Shared risk factors include unemployment or employment in elementary occupations, living alone, living in the North of England and being middle-aged and of white British ethnicity [<span>4</span>]. In line with this, Figure 1 shows that, across the regions of England, deaths of despair covary with income, economic inactivity and household deprivation. This is not to say that any one of these factors directly <i>causes</i> deaths of despair, rather, this serves to highlight that social context—made up of multiple, intertwined factors—should not be ignored when considering deaths of despair. These causes of death, therefore, appear not to be entirely disparate phenomena because they have shared social determinants [<span>5, 6</span>]. This is in broad alignment with data from the United States, where social isolation and unemployment, which vary by region, are associated with deaths of despair [<span>7</span>].</p><p>Withdrawal from the labour force, deprivation and social isolation can, directly or indirectly, lead to increased risk of mental ill health, such as depression and anxiety, as well as substance misuse [<span>8-10</span>]. This, in turn, can lead to diseases of despair, such as suicidal ideation or addiction to, or dependence on, alcohol or illicit drugs, and, eventually, death of despair. In this regard, diseases of despair follow a similar chronic time course, with death often occurring after prolonged mental illness or misuse of drugs or alcohol (or a combination of these). An individual's response to the societal factors which drive despair is likely to determine their risk of disease and death of despair. Similarly, it is clear that the social environment in which an individual experiences personal risk factors plays a role in determining their risk of death of despair [<span>6</span>]. This indicates a complex interaction between personal and societal factors, which are difficult to disentwine. A greater und","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"120 12","pages":"2599-2600"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.70203","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145197664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Addiction
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1