首页 > 最新文献

Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management最新文献

英文 中文
Vegetation and animal production in pastures sprayed for western ragweed control 喷洒西部豚草控制剂的牧场中的植被和动物产量
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20279
Keith Harmoney, John Jaeger, Jacob Hadle

Western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya DC) is one of the most common perennial, native forbs of western US rangelands. Cattle consume small quantities of western ragweed in their diets when present in the forage sward, and forage nutritive value tends to be greater than the associated grass component in those swards. Yet, many producers view western ragweed as an undesirable forb in rangelands. We conducted a study over two years to compare vegetative and stocker animal productivity in pastures that were either sprayed with dicamba at 6 oz/acre (0.19 lb a.i./acre) for western ragweed control or were left unsprayed. Pastures started the study with high western ragweed densities (>9 western ragweed plants/ft2) before pasture treatment, and spraying with dicamba significantly reduced western ragweed density and yield compared to unsprayed pastures (0.2 vs. 3.5 ragweed plants/ft2, and 0 vs. 206 lb/acre, respectively). Grass production and total vegetation production were similar between treatments. Crude protein and total digestible nutrients of western ragweed was greater than grass at all mid-season and end of season sampling dates both years. Stocker animal gain was not different between pastures sprayed for ragweed control and pastures left unsprayed in either year, nor when averaged over the two years (189 vs. 188 lb/head, sprayed vs. unsprayed, respectively). Beef production per acre was also similar. The spray treatment was an added expense that did not result in greater total forage, grass, or animal production. With natural fluctuations in western ragweed population densities due to weather patterns, producers will likely experience little benefit from spraying for western ragweed alone in pasture.

西部豚草(Ambrosia psilostachya DC)是美国西部牧场最常见的多年生原生草本植物之一。当西部豚草出现在牧草中时,牛会在其食物中摄入少量西部豚草,在这些牧草中,牧草的营养价值往往高于相关的禾本科成分。然而,许多生产者认为西部豚草是牧场中不受欢迎的禁草。我们进行了一项为期两年的研究,比较了喷洒 6 盎司/英亩(0.19 磅活性成分/英亩)麦草畏控制西部豚草或不喷洒麦草畏的牧场的植被和牲畜生产力。与未喷洒麦草畏的牧场相比,喷洒麦草畏能显著降低西部豚草的密度和产量(分别为 0.2 株/平方英尺和 3.5 株/平方英尺,以及 0 磅/英亩和 206 磅/英亩)。不同处理的牧草产量和植被总产量相似。在这两年的所有季中和季末取样日期,西部豚草的粗蛋白和可消化总养分都高于牧草。喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场和未喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场在任何一年的牲畜增重都没有差别,两年的平均值也没有差别(喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场和未喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场的牲畜增重分别为 189 磅/头和 188 磅/头)。每英亩的牛肉产量也相差无几。喷洒处理是一项额外开支,并没有提高饲料、草料或牲畜的总产量。由于天气模式导致西部豚草种群密度的自然波动,生产者可能不会从仅在牧场喷洒西部豚草中获益。
{"title":"Vegetation and animal production in pastures sprayed for western ragweed control","authors":"Keith Harmoney,&nbsp;John Jaeger,&nbsp;Jacob Hadle","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Western ragweed (<i>Ambrosia psilostachya</i> DC) is one of the most common perennial, native forbs of western US rangelands. Cattle consume small quantities of western ragweed in their diets when present in the forage sward, and forage nutritive value tends to be greater than the associated grass component in those swards. Yet, many producers view western ragweed as an undesirable forb in rangelands. We conducted a study over two years to compare vegetative and stocker animal productivity in pastures that were either sprayed with dicamba at 6 oz/acre (0.19 lb a.i./acre) for western ragweed control or were left unsprayed. Pastures started the study with high western ragweed densities (&gt;9 western ragweed plants/ft<sup>2</sup>) before pasture treatment, and spraying with dicamba significantly reduced western ragweed density and yield compared to unsprayed pastures (0.2 vs. 3.5 ragweed plants/ft<sup>2</sup>, and 0 vs. 206 lb/acre, respectively). Grass production and total vegetation production were similar between treatments. Crude protein and total digestible nutrients of western ragweed was greater than grass at all mid-season and end of season sampling dates both years. Stocker animal gain was not different between pastures sprayed for ragweed control and pastures left unsprayed in either year, nor when averaged over the two years (189 vs. 188 lb/head, sprayed vs. unsprayed, respectively). Beef production per acre was also similar. The spray treatment was an added expense that did not result in greater total forage, grass, or animal production. With natural fluctuations in western ragweed population densities due to weather patterns, producers will likely experience little benefit from spraying for western ragweed alone in pasture.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management Annual Report: 2023 作物、饲料和草坪管理年度报告:2023
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20275
{"title":"Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management Annual Report: 2023","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20275","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crop management recommendations: Agroptimizer decision support tool vs. local experts 作物管理建议:Agroptimizer 决策支持工具与当地专家的比较
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20277
Spyridon Mourtzinis, Shawn P. Conley

Farmers are making decisions every year under weather variability, input cost fluctuations, and commodity price uncertainty. Traditional replicated field trials cannot recommend actionable knowledge at the field level accounting for all sources of variability and uncertainty. Decision support tools aim to fill the gap that traditional agricultural research cannot. Agroptimizer (www.agroptimizer.com), a machine learning cloud-based decision support tool (DST) has a user-friendly interface that users can easily input field and management information and was designed to identify optimum corn and soybean cropping systems, for maximum yield and profit, across the United States. The recommended management practices of the DST were compared against cropping systems that were generated by University of Wisconsin researchers (called typical hereafter) across Wisconsin between 2021 and 2023. Agroptimizer recommendations for corn resulted in similar yield and profit compared to typical. For soybean, Agroptimizer recommendations resulted in increased yield and similar profit compared to typical. There was no downside yield and profit risk difference between Agroptimizer-based and typical cropping systems for both crops. Overall results showed that Agroptimizer successfully identified cropping systems that resulted in high yield and profit for both crops suggesting that in the absence of available expert recommendation, it can provide management practices with high yield and profit potential. Agroptimizer is being constantly updated and will be evaluated in additional locations across the United States in subsequent years.

农民每年都要在天气多变、投入成本波动和商品价格不确定的情况下做出决策。传统的重复田间试验无法在田间层面提供可操作的知识,无法考虑所有的变异性和不确定性来源。决策支持工具旨在弥补传统农业研究的不足。Agroptimizer(www.agroptimizer.com)是一款基于机器学习的云决策支持工具(DST),具有用户友好型界面,用户可以轻松输入田间和管理信息,其设计目的是在全美范围内确定最佳的玉米和大豆种植系统,以实现最高产量和利润。DST 推荐的管理方法与威斯康星大学研究人员在 2021 年至 2023 年期间在威斯康星州各地生成的种植系统(以下称为典型系统)进行了比较。Agroptimizer 推荐的玉米产量和利润与典型值相近。对于大豆,Agroptimizer 建议的产量和利润与典型值相近。基于 Agroptimizer 的种植系统与典型种植系统相比,两种作物的产量和利润风险都没有下降。总体结果表明,Agroptimizer 成功确定了两种作物的高产和高利润种植系统,这表明在没有专家建议的情况下,Agroptimizer 可以提供具有高产和高利润潜力的管理方法。Agroptimizer 正在不断更新,随后几年将在美国其他地方进行评估。
{"title":"Crop management recommendations: Agroptimizer decision support tool vs. local experts","authors":"Spyridon Mourtzinis,&nbsp;Shawn P. Conley","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20277","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farmers are making decisions every year under weather variability, input cost fluctuations, and commodity price uncertainty. Traditional replicated field trials cannot recommend actionable knowledge at the field level accounting for all sources of variability and uncertainty. Decision support tools aim to fill the gap that traditional agricultural research cannot. Agroptimizer (www.agroptimizer.com), a machine learning cloud-based decision support tool (DST) has a user-friendly interface that users can easily input field and management information and was designed to identify optimum corn and soybean cropping systems, for maximum yield and profit, across the United States. The recommended management practices of the DST were compared against cropping systems that were generated by University of Wisconsin researchers (called typical hereafter) across Wisconsin between 2021 and 2023. Agroptimizer recommendations for corn resulted in similar yield and profit compared to typical. For soybean, Agroptimizer recommendations resulted in increased yield and similar profit compared to typical. There was no downside yield and profit risk difference between Agroptimizer-based and typical cropping systems for both crops. Overall results showed that Agroptimizer successfully identified cropping systems that resulted in high yield and profit for both crops suggesting that in the absence of available expert recommendation, it can provide management practices with high yield and profit potential. Agroptimizer is being constantly updated and will be evaluated in additional locations across the United States in subsequent years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20277","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Weed control and rice response to microencapsulated acetochlor and a fenclorim seed treatment on a clay soil 粘土上的除草效果以及水稻对微胶囊乙草胺和芬克林种子处理剂的反应
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20274
Tristen H. Avent, Jason K. Norsworthy

Recent research has demonstrated the ability of a fenclorim seed treatment to reduce rice (Oryza sativa L.) injury to acetochlor. However, all studies were conducted on silt loam soils and have not evaluated rice tolerance or weed control on clay soils. Experiments were initiated in 2021 and 2022 at the Northeast Research and Extension Center near Keiser, AR, to determine rice response and the effectiveness of delayed-preemergence (DPRE)-applied microencapsulated (ME) acetochlor (1.1, 1.7, and 2.3 lb ai acre−1) when applied to a clay soil with and without a fenclorim seed treatment at 0 or 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb−1 of seed. Averaged over the fenclorim seed treatment, acetochlor at 1.1 and 1.7 lb ai acre−1 caused similar injury levels to rice; however, barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.] control increased at 1.7 lb ai acre−1, eliciting 19% injury to rice and 82% barnyardgrass control at 28 days after emergence (DAE). Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) control ranged from 82% to 93%. Additionally, fenclorim did not influence barnyardgrass or Palmer amaranth control, but it did reduce rice injury and increase shoot density, plant height, and rough rice grain yield. At 14 and 28 DAE, fenclorim at 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb−1 of seed (averaged over acetochlor rates) reduced visible rice injury from 61% to 13% and 40% to 8%, respectively. Results from this study indicate ME acetochlor could be successfully applied to rice grown on a clay soil when a fenclorim seed treatment is used, providing producers a new site of action for use in U.S. rice production.

最近的研究表明,芬克林种子处理剂能够减轻水稻(Oryza sativa L.)对乙草胺的伤害。不过,所有研究都是在淤泥质壤土上进行的,并未评估粘土上水稻的耐受性或杂草控制能力。2021 年和 2022 年,在美国阿肯色州凯泽附近的东北研究与推广中心启动了一项实验,以确定水稻对延迟萌发(DPRE)微胶囊化(ME)乙草胺(1.1、1.7 和 2.3 磅 ai acre-1)的反应,以及在粘土上施用或不施用芬克林种子处理(0 或 2.5 磅 ai 1000-lb-1 种子)时的效果。在芬克林种子处理的平均值上,1.1 和 1.7 lb ai acre-1 的乙草胺对水稻造成的伤害程度相似;然而,1.7 lb ai acre-1 的稗草[Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.]控制率增加,在出苗后 28 天(DAE),对水稻的伤害率为 19%,对稗草的控制率为 82%。帕尔默苋(Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson)的防治效果在 82% 到 93% 之间。此外,芬克林对稗草或帕尔默苋的控制没有影响,但它确实减少了水稻的伤害,增加了芽的密度、株高和糙米产量。在 14 和 28 DAE 期,使用 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb-1 种子的芬克林(乙草胺施用量的平均值)可分别将水稻可见伤害从 61% 降至 13%,从 40% 降至 8%。这项研究的结果表明,当使用芬克林种子处理剂时,炔草酯可以成功地应用于粘土上种植的水稻,为生产者提供了在美国水稻生产中使用的新作用点。
{"title":"Weed control and rice response to microencapsulated acetochlor and a fenclorim seed treatment on a clay soil","authors":"Tristen H. Avent,&nbsp;Jason K. Norsworthy","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20274","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent research has demonstrated the ability of a fenclorim seed treatment to reduce rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) injury to acetochlor. However, all studies were conducted on silt loam soils and have not evaluated rice tolerance or weed control on clay soils. Experiments were initiated in 2021 and 2022 at the Northeast Research and Extension Center near Keiser, AR, to determine rice response and the effectiveness of delayed-preemergence (DPRE)-applied microencapsulated (ME) acetochlor (1.1, 1.7, and 2.3 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) when applied to a clay soil with and without a fenclorim seed treatment at 0 or 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb<sup>−1</sup> of seed. Averaged over the fenclorim seed treatment, acetochlor at 1.1 and 1.7 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup> caused similar injury levels to rice; however, barnyardgrass [<i>Echinochloa crus-galli</i> (L.) P. Beauv.] control increased at 1.7 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>, eliciting 19% injury to rice and 82% barnyardgrass control at 28 days after emergence (DAE). Palmer amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Watson) control ranged from 82% to 93%. Additionally, fenclorim did not influence barnyardgrass or Palmer amaranth control, but it did reduce rice injury and increase shoot density, plant height, and rough rice grain yield. At 14 and 28 DAE, fenclorim at 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb<sup>−1</sup> of seed (averaged over acetochlor rates) reduced visible rice injury from 61% to 13% and 40% to 8%, respectively. Results from this study indicate ME acetochlor could be successfully applied to rice grown on a clay soil when a fenclorim seed treatment is used, providing producers a new site of action for use in U.S. rice production.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20274","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140342951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sports field users in Minnesota support herbicide use for weed-free recreation 明尼苏达州运动场使用者支持使用除草剂进行无杂草娱乐活动
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20276
Michael R. Barnes, Eric Watkins

Weeds are a consistent nuisance, and intrusion can impact turfgrass in multiple ways. On sports fields, weed pressure can disrupt surface consistency, which can impair playability, performance, and lead to injury risk (Aldahir & McElroy, 2014; Brosnan et al., 2014; Straw et al., 2018). Surface inconsistency then can diminish the benefits that sports participation can have on individuals' health and well-being (Eigenschenk et al., 2019).

Controlling weeds in turfgrass can involve cultural practices, mechanical removal, and application of herbicides. While cultural practices and mechanical removal can be effective for minimizing weeds, eliminating weeds in turf frequently requires the use of herbicides (Hahn et al., 2020; McElroy & Martins, 2013). The use of herbicides though has been challenged by urban residents and decision makers due to concerns around human and environmental impacts resulting in increased regulations or usage bans (Camargo et al., 2020; Larson et al., 2010; Riches et al., 2020). However, a gap exists in understanding user perceptions of weed control methods, including herbicides, on sports fields. The primary goal was to survey adult sports field users to evaluate their views on herbicide use and other weed control measures concerning health and safety, playing surface quality, and aesthetics.

An online survey conducted from August to October 2023 was distributed via municipal and private recreational sports programs to reach adult sports field users in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area of Minnesota. Participants were asked about the acceptability of weed presence in sports fields, and the amount of weeds that would impact their performance, safety, and enjoyment using a photo series (Figure 1). Additionally, participants were asked about weed control methods and their support for use, harmfulness to humans/environment, and effectiveness of the method; all questions were measured using a Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Demographic questions included age, gender, and recreational sports participation. Repeated measures analysis of variance, post-hoc Tukey's honest significant difference, and effect size analyses were conducted using Stata version 18 to assess differences between perceptions and weed control methods.

Two hundred forty-one completed survey responses were received. Participants had an average age of 30 years old (min = 18, max = 63), and the sample was 51% female and 49% male. Half of the participants played multiple sports (M = 2.5). The most common sports participated in were soccer (30%), baseball/softball (21%), kickball (18%), ultimate frisbee (14%), disc golf (11%), volleyball (9%), flag football (8%), tackle football (1%), and golf (1%).

Herbicide use on turfgrass is often needed for sports turf to maintain a safe, consi

杂草是一种常见的滋扰,其入侵会对草坪造成多方面的影响。在运动场上,杂草的压力会破坏草坪表面的一致性,从而影响草坪的可运动性和表现,并导致受伤风险(Aldahir &amp; McElroy, 2014; Brosnan 等人,2014; Straw 等人,2018)。因此,表面不一致会减少参与体育运动对个人健康和福祉的益处(Eigenschenk 等人,2019 年)。虽然文化习俗和机械清除可以有效地减少杂草,但消灭草皮中的杂草往往需要使用除草剂(Hahn 等人,2020 年;McElroy &amp; Martins,2013 年)。由于对人类和环境影响的担忧,除草剂的使用受到了城市居民和决策者的质疑,导致法规和使用禁令的增加(Camargo 等人,2020 年;Larson 等人,2010 年;Riches 等人,2020 年)。然而,在了解用户对运动场杂草控制方法(包括除草剂)的看法方面还存在差距。2023 年 8 月至 10 月,我们通过市政和私人休闲体育项目对明尼苏达州双子城都市区的成人运动场使用者进行了在线调查,以评估他们对除草剂使用和其他杂草控制措施的看法。调查通过一系列照片(图 1)询问参与者对运动场中杂草存在的可接受性,以及杂草的数量会对他们的运动表现、安全性和运动乐趣造成的影响。此外,参与者还被问及杂草控制方法及其使用支持度、对人类/环境的危害性以及方法的有效性;所有问题均采用李克特量表进行测量(1 = 非常不同意,7 = 非常同意)。人口统计学问题包括年龄、性别和休闲运动参与情况。使用 Stata version 18 进行了重复测量方差分析、事后 Tukey's 诚实显著差异分析和效应大小分析,以评估看法和杂草控制方法之间的差异。参与者的平均年龄为 30 岁(最小 = 18 岁,最大 = 63 岁),其中女性占 51%,男性占 49%。半数参与者从事多种体育运动(M = 2.5)。最常见的运动项目是足球(30%)、棒球/垒球(21%)、踢球(18%)、极限飞盘(14%)、飞盘高尔夫(11%)、排球(9%)、旗橄榄球(8%)、擒拿橄榄球(1%)和高尔夫(1%)。本研究旨在了解明尼苏达州成年休闲运动员对运动场地杂草和杂草控制方法的看法。参与者倾向于无杂草运动场地,支持他们认为有效的杂草控制方法,如 IPM 和传统除草剂。虽然参与者表达了对无杂草家庭草坪的渴望,但对为此目的使用化学品的认可和使用却不那么直接(Blaine 等人,2012 年;Varlamoff 等人,2001 年)。与其他草坪区域相比,运动场具有特定的使用性质,这可能是造成这种区别的原因。运动场有用户特定的要求和偏好,用户关注表面质量和特性(Barnes &amp; Watkins, 2022; Roberts 等人, 2019; Straw 等人, 2018)。参与者表示支持使用 IPM 和传统除草剂控制,强调杂草在中压或高压水平下对享受、性能或安全的影响。虽然有些杂草不会影响运动方面,但人们明显更喜欢没有杂草或杂草较少的草坪,这反映了人们对无杂草草坪的广泛渴望(Barnes 等人,2020 年;Blaine 等人,2012 年)。此外,尽管承认对环境和人类健康有潜在危害,但参与者还是赞同这种方法,这与之前在住宅庭院中的研究结果一致,在住宅庭院中,人们选择有选择性地使用除草剂来达到无杂草的美观效果,在承认潜在危害的同时,强调使用的简便性和有效性(Blaine 等人,2012 年;Larson 等人,2010 年;Varlamoff 等人,2001 年)。加强对天然草坪草运动场地的维护可遏制人工草坪的安装,人工草坪虽然不受欢迎,但因其一致性和性能而被接受(Barnes &amp; Watkins, 2022, 2023)。在天然草皮上改进 IPM 和有针对性地使用除草剂可以解决气候变化问题和除草剂抗药性问题(Brosnan 等人,2020 年;Mallen &amp; Dingle,2017 年)。
{"title":"Sports field users in Minnesota support herbicide use for weed-free recreation","authors":"Michael R. Barnes,&nbsp;Eric Watkins","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20276","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Weeds are a consistent nuisance, and intrusion can impact turfgrass in multiple ways. On sports fields, weed pressure can disrupt surface consistency, which can impair playability, performance, and lead to injury risk (Aldahir &amp; McElroy, <span>2014</span>; Brosnan et al., <span>2014</span>; Straw et al., <span>2018</span>). Surface inconsistency then can diminish the benefits that sports participation can have on individuals' health and well-being (Eigenschenk et al., <span>2019</span>).</p><p>Controlling weeds in turfgrass can involve cultural practices, mechanical removal, and application of herbicides. While cultural practices and mechanical removal can be effective for minimizing weeds, eliminating weeds in turf frequently requires the use of herbicides (Hahn et al., <span>2020</span>; McElroy &amp; Martins, <span>2013</span>). The use of herbicides though has been challenged by urban residents and decision makers due to concerns around human and environmental impacts resulting in increased regulations or usage bans (Camargo et al., <span>2020</span>; Larson et al., <span>2010</span>; Riches et al., <span>2020</span>). However, a gap exists in understanding user perceptions of weed control methods, including herbicides, on sports fields. The primary goal was to survey adult sports field users to evaluate their views on herbicide use and other weed control measures concerning health and safety, playing surface quality, and aesthetics.</p><p>An online survey conducted from August to October 2023 was distributed via municipal and private recreational sports programs to reach adult sports field users in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area of Minnesota. Participants were asked about the acceptability of weed presence in sports fields, and the amount of weeds that would impact their performance, safety, and enjoyment using a photo series (Figure 1). Additionally, participants were asked about weed control methods and their support for use, harmfulness to humans/environment, and effectiveness of the method; all questions were measured using a Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Demographic questions included age, gender, and recreational sports participation. Repeated measures analysis of variance, post-hoc Tukey's honest significant difference, and effect size analyses were conducted using Stata version 18 to assess differences between perceptions and weed control methods.</p><p>Two hundred forty-one completed survey responses were received. Participants had an average age of 30 years old (min = 18, max = 63), and the sample was 51% female and 49% male. Half of the participants played multiple sports (<i>M</i> = 2.5). The most common sports participated in were soccer (30%), baseball/softball (21%), kickball (18%), ultimate frisbee (14%), disc golf (11%), volleyball (9%), flag football (8%), tackle football (1%), and golf (1%).</p><p>Herbicide use on turfgrass is often needed for sports turf to maintain a safe, consi","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20276","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140333356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response of chickpea's yield and yield components to double inoculation with mycorrhiza and rhizobium under split application of nitrogen 鹰嘴豆的产量和产量成分对分次施氮下菌根和根瘤菌双重接种的反应
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20273
Babak Malekian, Mehdi Parsa, Mohammad Hassan Fallah, Saeedreza Vessal

The utilization of advantageous microorganisms as a biofertilizer has gained significant importance in the agricultural industry due to their potential contribution to food safety and the sustainable cultivation of crops. To evaluate the effect of nitrogen (N) fertilizer and co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhiza and rhizobium on the yield and yield component of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), a 2-year field experiment was conducted in 2020–2021 at the Agricultural Research Station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. The experiment was designed as a randomized block trial in factorial design with three replicates. The treatments included two levels of inoculation (noninoculated and inoculated with rhizobium and mycorrhiza) and application of different levels of N fertilizer (0, 25, or 50 kg ha−1) at three growth stages (sowing, flowering, pod filling) as follows; F0 (0,0,0), F1 (25,0,0), F2 (25,25,0), F3 (25,25,25), F4 (50,0,0), F5 (50,50,0) and F6 (50,50,50), respectively. The results showed that seed inoculation and split N fertilization significantly increased yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Seed inoculation showed the highest values for all traits studied compared to the noninoculated treatments. Moreover, among the fertilizer treatments, the highest values for plant height (41.8 cm), number of branches (9.1), number of grains per plant (17.8) and 100-grain weight (30.4 g) from F6 through the F3 treatment, were statistically similar. The results show that the effect of inoculation is more significant when a lower amount of N fertilizer is applied. Due to the health and environmental problems associated with chemical fertilizers, double inoculation and split application of N fertilizers at lower doses can be recommended.

由于优势微生物对食品安全和作物可持续栽培的潜在贡献,利用优势微生物作为生物肥料已在农业产业中占据重要地位。为了评估氮肥以及与丛枝菌根和根瘤菌共同接种对鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)产量和产量成分的影响,2020-2021 年在伊朗马什哈德 Ferdowsi 大学农业研究站进行了为期两年的田间试验。试验设计为随机区组试验,采用因子设计,设三个重复。处理包括两种水平的接种(未接种和接种根瘤菌和菌根),以及在三个生长阶段(播种、开花、结荚)施用不同水平的氮肥(0、25 或 50 千克/公顷),具体如下;分别为 F0(0,0,0)、F1(25,0,0)、F2(25,25,0)、F3(25,25,25)、F4(50,0,0)、F5(50,50,0)和 F6(50,50,50)。结果表明,接种种子和分次施氮能显著提高鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)的产量和产量成分。与未接种处理相比,种子接种在所有性状上都显示出最高值。此外,在肥料处理中,从 F6 到 F3 处理的株高(41.8 厘米)、分枝数(9.1)、单株粒数(17.8)和百粒重(30.4 克)的最高值在统计学上相似。结果表明,当氮肥施用量较低时,接种效果更为显著。由于化肥带来的健康和环境问题,建议使用双重接种和分次施用较低剂量的氮肥。
{"title":"Response of chickpea's yield and yield components to double inoculation with mycorrhiza and rhizobium under split application of nitrogen","authors":"Babak Malekian,&nbsp;Mehdi Parsa,&nbsp;Mohammad Hassan Fallah,&nbsp;Saeedreza Vessal","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20273","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The utilization of advantageous microorganisms as a biofertilizer has gained significant importance in the agricultural industry due to their potential contribution to food safety and the sustainable cultivation of crops. To evaluate the effect of nitrogen (N) fertilizer and co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhiza and rhizobium on the yield and yield component of chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i> L.), a 2-year field experiment was conducted in 2020–2021 at the Agricultural Research Station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. The experiment was designed as a randomized block trial in factorial design with three replicates. The treatments included two levels of inoculation (noninoculated and inoculated with rhizobium and mycorrhiza) and application of different levels of N fertilizer (0, 25, or 50 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) at three growth stages (sowing, flowering, pod filling) as follows; F0 (0,0,0), F1 (25,0,0), F2 (25,25,0), F3 (25,25,25), F4 (50,0,0), F5 (50,50,0) and F6 (50,50,50), respectively. The results showed that seed inoculation and split N fertilization significantly increased yield and yield components in chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i> L.). Seed inoculation showed the highest values for all traits studied compared to the noninoculated treatments. Moreover, among the fertilizer treatments, the highest values for plant height (41.8 cm), number of branches (9.1), number of grains per plant (17.8) and 100-grain weight (30.4 g) from F6 through the F3 treatment, were statistically similar. The results show that the effect of inoculation is more significant when a lower amount of N fertilizer is applied. Due to the health and environmental problems associated with chemical fertilizers, double inoculation and split application of N fertilizers at lower doses can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140310326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of gender and glyphosate resistance on Palmer amaranth growth and interference with cotton 性别和对草甘膦的抗性对帕尔默苋的生长和干扰棉花的影响
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-24 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20272
Charles W. Cahoon, David L. Jordan, Patrick J. Tranel, Alan C. York, Chance Riggins, Richard Seagroves, Matthew Inman, Wesley Everman, Ramon Leon

Management of herbicide-resistant weeds can be improved by understanding the biology of resistant biotypes. While the majority of research has focused on female plants and seed production of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) that are resistant to glyphosate, growth of male plants that are resistant to this herbicide has not been studied in detail. Additionally, interference of male versus female Palmer amaranth plants on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) yield has not been reported. Plant height and biomass of male and female plants from a mixed population of glyphosate-resistant (GR) and glyphosate-susceptible (GS) plants was studied in North Carolina when grown season-long with cotton. Palmer amaranth height was less for GR male plants compared with GS males and both GR and GS females. Biomass of Palmer amaranth female plants was twice that of male plants irrespective of glyphosate resistance. Cotton yield was affected similarly by Palmer amaranth regardless of either gender or glyphosate resistance status. The implications of shorter GR male plants on pollen dispersal and ramifications on management of glyphosate resistance are not known. Results from these trials did not address implications of the height of male plants on fitness of GR resistance. Nonetheless, the finding that GR male plants were shorter in the field than GS male plants warrants a new look at this topic. Similar reductions for cotton yield in presence of both GR and GS biotypes and genders suggest that current yield loss assessments and management decisions do not need to consider these variables in Palmer amaranth populations.

通过了解抗性生物型的生物学特性,可以改善对抗性杂草的管理。虽然大多数研究都集中在对草甘膦有抗性的帕尔默苋(Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson)雌株和种子生产上,但对这种除草剂有抗性的雄株的生长情况还没有详细研究。此外,雌雄帕尔默苋对棉花(Gossypium hirsutum)产量的影响也未见报道。在北卡罗来纳州,研究了抗草甘膦(GR)和易受草甘膦(GS)植物混合群体中的雌雄植株与棉花同季生长时的株高和生物量。与 GS 雄性植株相比,GR 雄性植株以及 GR 和 GS 雌性植株的帕尔默苋高度较低。无论是否具有草甘膦抗性,帕尔默苋雌株的生物量都是雄株的两倍。棉花产量也同样受到帕尔默苋的影响,与性别和草甘膦抗性无关。较短的 GR 雄性植株对花粉传播的影响以及对草甘膦抗性管理的影响尚不清楚。这些试验结果并未涉及雄株高度对 GR 抗性适应性的影响。尽管如此,GR 雄株在田间比 GS 雄性植株矮小的发现仍值得我们重新审视这一问题。在存在 GR 和 GS 两种生物型和性别的情况下,棉花产量的减少情况相似,这表明目前的产量损失评估和管理决策无需考虑帕尔默苋种群中的这些变量。
{"title":"Influence of gender and glyphosate resistance on Palmer amaranth growth and interference with cotton","authors":"Charles W. Cahoon,&nbsp;David L. Jordan,&nbsp;Patrick J. Tranel,&nbsp;Alan C. York,&nbsp;Chance Riggins,&nbsp;Richard Seagroves,&nbsp;Matthew Inman,&nbsp;Wesley Everman,&nbsp;Ramon Leon","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20272","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Management of herbicide-resistant weeds can be improved by understanding the biology of resistant biotypes. While the majority of research has focused on female plants and seed production of Palmer amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Watson) that are resistant to glyphosate, growth of male plants that are resistant to this herbicide has not been studied in detail. Additionally, interference of male versus female Palmer amaranth plants on cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i>) yield has not been reported. Plant height and biomass of male and female plants from a mixed population of glyphosate-resistant (GR) and glyphosate-susceptible (GS) plants was studied in North Carolina when grown season-long with cotton. Palmer amaranth height was less for GR male plants compared with GS males and both GR and GS females. Biomass of Palmer amaranth female plants was twice that of male plants irrespective of glyphosate resistance. Cotton yield was affected similarly by Palmer amaranth regardless of either gender or glyphosate resistance status. The implications of shorter GR male plants on pollen dispersal and ramifications on management of glyphosate resistance are not known. Results from these trials did not address implications of the height of male plants on fitness of GR resistance. Nonetheless, the finding that GR male plants were shorter in the field than GS male plants warrants a new look at this topic. Similar reductions for cotton yield in presence of both GR and GS biotypes and genders suggest that current yield loss assessments and management decisions do not need to consider these variables in Palmer amaranth populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140209659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moisture relationships among conventional and brown-midrib corn hybrids for silage 用于青贮的常规玉米杂交种和棕色中肋玉米杂交种之间的水分关系
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20271
J. H. Cherney, D. J. R. Cherney, M. F. Digman

Much of the corn acreage in New York state is harvested as corn silage and moisture assessment in the field is necessary for predicting harvest timing, but moisture estimation visually is very problematic, particularly for brown-midrib (BMR) hybrids. Our goal was to assess plant moisture relationships between BMR and conventional (CONV) corn hybrids, and to identify metadata that may assist in the prediction of whole plant moisture based on ear moisture estimations. In 2023, 202 corn fields were sampled in central New York from August 18 to September 27. A total of 41 different corn hybrids were sampled, with relative maturity (RM) ranging from 84 to 112 days, and 29% of the fields sampled were planted to BMR hybrids. Five representative plants per field were evaluated for plant height, ear length and width, and ear, stover, and whole plant moisture. Estimation of dry ear:stover ratio would be helpful in estimating whole plant moisture based on ear moisture. Ear length was not related to ear:stover ratio, while plant height and ear width were weakly but significantly correlated with ear:stover ratio. Ear moisture was highly correlated with ear:stover ratio (BMR, r = −0.95; CONV, r = −0.90), and highly correlated with whole plant moisture (BMR, r = 0.97; CONV, r = 0.98). Ear moisture averaged 1 to 2% units lower throughout the sampling season for BMR compared to CONV hybrids, while stover moisture averaged 1 to 2% units higher for BMR compared to CONV hybrids prior to optimum harvest moisture. Whole plant moisture declined about 0.6%units/day and was relatively similar across RM groups.

纽约州的大部分玉米耕地都是作为玉米青贮收获的,田间水分评估对于预测收获时机非常必要,但水分目测估算很成问题,尤其是对于褐中肋杂交种(BMR)。我们的目标是评估 BMR 和常规(CONV)玉米杂交种之间的植株水分关系,并确定有助于根据果穗水分估计预测整株水分的元数据。2023 年 8 月 18 日至 9 月 27 日,在纽约中部对 202 块玉米田进行了采样。共采样了 41 种不同的玉米杂交种,相对成熟度 (RM) 从 84 天到 112 天不等,其中 29% 的采样田种植的是 BMR 杂交种。对每块田的五株代表性植株的株高、穗长和穗宽以及穗、秸秆和全株水分进行了评估。根据果穗水分估算干果穗与秸秆的比率有助于估算全株水分。穗长与穗秸比无关,而株高和穗宽与穗秸比有微弱但显著的相关性。果穗水分与果穗秸秆比高度相关(BMR,r = -0.95;CONV,r = -0.90),与全株水分高度相关(BMR,r = 0.97;CONV,r = 0.98)。与 CONV 杂交品种相比,BMR 品种在整个采样季节的穗部水分平均低 1-2% 个单位,而在最佳收割水分之前,BMR 品种的秸秆水分平均比 CONV 杂交品种高 1-2% 个单位。全株水分每天下降约 0.6%单位,各 RM 组之间相对相似。
{"title":"Moisture relationships among conventional and brown-midrib corn hybrids for silage","authors":"J. H. Cherney,&nbsp;D. J. R. Cherney,&nbsp;M. F. Digman","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20271","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much of the corn acreage in New York state is harvested as corn silage and moisture assessment in the field is necessary for predicting harvest timing, but moisture estimation visually is very problematic, particularly for brown-midrib (BMR) hybrids. Our goal was to assess plant moisture relationships between BMR and conventional (CONV) corn hybrids, and to identify metadata that may assist in the prediction of whole plant moisture based on ear moisture estimations. In 2023, 202 corn fields were sampled in central New York from August 18 to September 27. A total of 41 different corn hybrids were sampled, with relative maturity (RM) ranging from 84 to 112 days, and 29% of the fields sampled were planted to BMR hybrids. Five representative plants per field were evaluated for plant height, ear length and width, and ear, stover, and whole plant moisture. Estimation of dry ear:stover ratio would be helpful in estimating whole plant moisture based on ear moisture. Ear length was not related to ear:stover ratio, while plant height and ear width were weakly but significantly correlated with ear:stover ratio. Ear moisture was highly correlated with ear:stover ratio (BMR, <i>r</i> = −0.95; CONV, <i>r</i> = −0.90), and highly correlated with whole plant moisture (BMR, <i>r</i> = 0.97; CONV, <i>r</i> = 0.98). Ear moisture averaged 1 to 2% units lower throughout the sampling season for BMR compared to CONV hybrids, while stover moisture averaged 1 to 2% units higher for BMR compared to CONV hybrids prior to optimum harvest moisture. Whole plant moisture declined about 0.6%units/day and was relatively similar across RM groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20271","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140164234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improved management of the bermudagrass stem maggot 改进对百慕大草茎蛆的管理
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20269
Lisa L. Baxter, William F. Anderson, William G. Hudson, Esteban F. Rios, Cody H. Bowling, Dennis W. Hancock, Roger N. Gates, Justin C. Burt

The bermudagrass stem maggot (BSM; Atherigona reversura Villeneuve) continues to damage bermudagrass [Cynodon dactlyon (L.) Pers.] pastures and hayfields throughout the southeastern United States each season. This management guide describes how to identify the damage to the forage and the bermudagrass stem maggot as a larva, pupa, and fly. Strategically timed pyrethroid applications reduce adult BSM populations and yield loss, but ongoing efforts are focused on developing integrated pest management plans that include cultural, physical, and biological suppression efforts. Research is ongoing to improve the effectiveness of insecticide applications and screen new modes of action to prevent resistance to the pyrethroids. However, long-term solutions will require development and release of tolerant bermudagrass cultivars to reduce the reliance on pesticides. Fine-stem bermudagrass lines are more susceptible to bermudagrass stem maggot damage than lines with thicker stem diameters. While ‘Tifton 85’ is still considered the standard to which we compare all other bermudagrass lines for BSM tolerance, there is still room for improvement. Genotypes currently under evaluation maintain the positive attributes of Tifton 85 while overcoming these challenges.

百慕大草茎蛆(BSM;Atherigona reversura Villeneuve)每个季节都会继续危害美国东南部的百慕大草[Cynodon dactlyon (L.) Pers.]牧场和干草场。本管理指南介绍了如何识别牧草和百慕大草茎蛆幼虫、蛹和蝇的危害。有策略地适时施用除虫菊酯可减少 BSM 成虫数量和产量损失,但目前的工作重点是制定虫害综合防治计划,其中包括文化、物理和生物抑制措施。目前正在开展研究,以提高杀虫剂的使用效果,并筛选新的作用模式,防止除虫菊酯产生抗药性。不过,长期解决方案需要开发和推出耐受性强的百慕大草品种,以减少对杀虫剂的依赖。茎细的百慕大草品系比茎直径粗的品系更容易受到百慕大草茎蛆的危害。虽然'Tifton 85'仍被认为是我们比较所有其他百慕大草品系耐受 BSM 能力的标准,但仍有改进的余地。目前正在评估的基因型在克服这些挑战的同时,还保持了 "Tifton 85 "的积极特性。
{"title":"Improved management of the bermudagrass stem maggot","authors":"Lisa L. Baxter,&nbsp;William F. Anderson,&nbsp;William G. Hudson,&nbsp;Esteban F. Rios,&nbsp;Cody H. Bowling,&nbsp;Dennis W. Hancock,&nbsp;Roger N. Gates,&nbsp;Justin C. Burt","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20269","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The bermudagrass stem maggot (BSM; <i>Atherigona reversura</i> Villeneuve) continues to damage bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactlyon</i> (L.) Pers.] pastures and hayfields throughout the southeastern United States each season. This management guide describes how to identify the damage to the forage and the bermudagrass stem maggot as a larva, pupa, and fly. Strategically timed pyrethroid applications reduce adult BSM populations and yield loss, but ongoing efforts are focused on developing integrated pest management plans that include cultural, physical, and biological suppression efforts. Research is ongoing to improve the effectiveness of insecticide applications and screen new modes of action to prevent resistance to the pyrethroids. However, long-term solutions will require development and release of tolerant bermudagrass cultivars to reduce the reliance on pesticides. Fine-stem bermudagrass lines are more susceptible to bermudagrass stem maggot damage than lines with thicker stem diameters. While ‘Tifton 85’ is still considered the standard to which we compare all other bermudagrass lines for BSM tolerance, there is still room for improvement. Genotypes currently under evaluation maintain the positive attributes of Tifton 85 while overcoming these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20269","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140114229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determining the optimum planting date × maturity group combination for soybean produced in South Carolina 确定南卡罗来纳州生产的大豆的最佳种植日期×成熟度组别组合
IF 0.6 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20270
Sarah K. Holladay, Michael T. Plumblee, Michael W. Marshall, Michael A. Jones, Sruthi Narayanan

Previous research has shown that delayed planting of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) can reduce yield by as much as 30 lb ac−1 day−1 when planted after mid-June. In South Carolina, soybean is often planted in rotation with other crops or double-cropped behind cereal grains, which can lead to delayed planting and potential yield-loss. In this study, our objective was to determine the optimum planting date (PD) × maturity group (MG) combination on non-irrigated soybean yield in South Carolina, and to determine yield results for the entire planting window ranging from March through August. Four MGs (IV, V, VI, and VII) were planted on six PDs (March–August) in 2021 and 2022 in Florence and Blackville, SC. Data collection consisted of stand counts to determine final plant populations, end-of-season plant height and node counts, and yield/moisture content at harvest. The April, May, and June PDs resulted in the highest grain yield in Blackville in 2021 (averaging 76 bu ac−1) and 2022 (averaging 42 bu ac−1). The April and May PDs had the highest grain yield in Florence when averaged over both years (53 bu ac−1). MG alone did not influence yield in Florence. However, MGs V, VI, and VII produced the highest yields in Blackville. The optimum PD × MG combination for yield was the May planted MG V in Blackville (88 bu ac−1 in 2021 and 49 bu ac−1 in 2022) and the April planted MG VII in Florence (65 bu ac−1). Plant heights and node counts were highest when soybean was planted in April and May, and MG IV had the tallest plants overall due to its indeterminate growth habit. Results from this study suggest that planting soybean as early as late-March and as late as late-June may not reduce soybean yield in South Carolina as some late-March and late-June MG combinations met or exceeded the state yield average of 37 bu ac−1 and did not differ statistically from April and May yields. This research has already impacted soybean growers in South Carolina as the crop insurance window for full coverage has been extended to include earlier and later PDs as of 2023.

以前的研究表明,大豆(Glycine max L. Merr.)如果在 6 月中旬以后播种,延迟播种会使产量减少多达 30 磅 ac-1 day-1。在南卡罗来纳州,大豆通常与其他作物轮作或在谷物后面双季种植,这可能会导致延迟种植和潜在的产量损失。在这项研究中,我们的目标是确定南卡罗来纳州非灌溉大豆产量的最佳播种日期 (PD) × 成熟度组 (MG) 组合,并确定从 3 月到 8 月整个播种期的产量结果。2021 年和 2022 年,在南卡罗来纳州的佛罗伦萨和布莱克维尔,四个成熟度组(IV、V、VI 和 VII)被种植在六个种植期(3 月至 8 月)。数据收集包括植株计数以确定最终植株数量、季末株高和节数以及收获时的产量/水分含量。布莱克维尔 2021 年(平均 76 蒲式耳-英亩-1)和 2022 年(平均 42 蒲式耳-英亩-1)4 月、5 月和 6 月的旱季谷物产量最高。佛罗伦萨在这两年中,4 月和 5 月的预测日平均谷物产量最高(53 bu ac-1)。在佛罗伦萨,单是中期干旱并不影响产量。然而,在布莱克维尔(Blackville),混合基因 V、VI 和 VII 产量最高。布莱克维尔五月种植的 MG V(2021 年为 88 bu ac-1,2022 年为 49 bu ac-1)和佛罗伦萨四月种植的 MG VII(65 bu ac-1)是产量最佳的 PD × MG 组合。4 月和 5 月种植的大豆株高和节数最高,而 MG IV 由于生长习性不定,植株总体最高。这项研究的结果表明,南卡罗来纳州在 3 月下旬和 6 月下旬种植大豆可能不会降低大豆产量,因为一些 3 月下旬和 6 月下旬种植的 MG 组合达到或超过了该州 37 bu ac-1 的平均产量,并且与 4 月和 5 月的产量没有统计学差异。这项研究已经对南卡罗来纳州的大豆种植者产生了影响,因为自 2023 年起,农作物保险的全额承保窗口已被延长,包括较早和较晚的 PDs。
{"title":"Determining the optimum planting date × maturity group combination for soybean produced in South Carolina","authors":"Sarah K. Holladay,&nbsp;Michael T. Plumblee,&nbsp;Michael W. Marshall,&nbsp;Michael A. Jones,&nbsp;Sruthi Narayanan","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20270","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research has shown that delayed planting of soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L. Merr.) can reduce yield by as much as 30 lb ac<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> when planted after mid-June. In South Carolina, soybean is often planted in rotation with other crops or double-cropped behind cereal grains, which can lead to delayed planting and potential yield-loss. In this study, our objective was to determine the optimum planting date (PD) × maturity group (MG) combination on non-irrigated soybean yield in South Carolina, and to determine yield results for the entire planting window ranging from March through August. Four MGs (IV, V, VI, and VII) were planted on six PDs (March–August) in 2021 and 2022 in Florence and Blackville, SC. Data collection consisted of stand counts to determine final plant populations, end-of-season plant height and node counts, and yield/moisture content at harvest. The April, May, and June PDs resulted in the highest grain yield in Blackville in 2021 (averaging 76 bu ac<sup>−1</sup>) and 2022 (averaging 42 bu ac<sup>−1</sup>). The April and May PDs had the highest grain yield in Florence when averaged over both years (53 bu ac<sup>−1</sup>). MG alone did not influence yield in Florence. However, MGs V, VI, and VII produced the highest yields in Blackville. The optimum PD × MG combination for yield was the May planted MG V in Blackville (88 bu ac<sup>−1</sup> in 2021 and 49 bu ac<sup>−1</sup> in 2022) and the April planted MG VII in Florence (65 bu ac<sup>−1</sup>). Plant heights and node counts were highest when soybean was planted in April and May, and MG IV had the tallest plants overall due to its indeterminate growth habit. Results from this study suggest that planting soybean as early as late-March and as late as late-June may not reduce soybean yield in South Carolina as some late-March and late-June MG combinations met or exceeded the state yield average of 37 bu ac<sup>−1</sup> and did not differ statistically from April and May yields. This research has already impacted soybean growers in South Carolina as the crop insurance window for full coverage has been extended to include earlier and later PDs as of 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20270","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140031864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1