F. Read Kelly, Jason A. Bond, Corey J. Bryant, J. Trenton Irby, Don R. Cook, L. Jason Krutz
Planting date, row configuration, and seeding rate are three critical factors in obtaining maximum soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain yield and can vary based on soil texture. Therefore, two studies were conducted at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS. The first study was conducted from 2019 to 2021 and sought to determine the effects of planting date (optimal and delayed 21 days), and row configuration (single-, twin-, and triple-row) on soybean growth, development, and grain yield. The second study was conducted in 2021 with three site-years to determine the effects of seeding rate (130,000, 180,000, and 220,000 seeds acre−1) in a triple-row configuration on soybean grain yield compared to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre−1 on two soil textures (silt loam and clay). Both studies were repeated on silt loam and clay soil textures in every site-year. In the first study, the optimal planting date increased soybean grain yield regardless of soil texture. On both soil textures, twin- and single-row configuration yields were equivalent, but triple-row configuration reduced soybean grain yield up to 9%. Similarly, triple-row configuration reduced soybean density and height at R3 and R8 growth stages. In the second study, increasing triple-row configuration soybean seeding rate by at least 38% provided similar soybean grain yields to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre−1. These data indicate that triple-row soybean planting configurations do have some benefits, but that future research should focus on equipment limitations experienced in the current research.
{"title":"Agronomic performance of soybean with varied planting dates, row configurations, and seeding rates on two different soil textures","authors":"F. Read Kelly, Jason A. Bond, Corey J. Bryant, J. Trenton Irby, Don R. Cook, L. Jason Krutz","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Planting date, row configuration, and seeding rate are three critical factors in obtaining maximum soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] grain yield and can vary based on soil texture. Therefore, two studies were conducted at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS. The first study was conducted from 2019 to 2021 and sought to determine the effects of planting date (optimal and delayed 21 days), and row configuration (single-, twin-, and triple-row) on soybean growth, development, and grain yield. The second study was conducted in 2021 with three site-years to determine the effects of seeding rate (130,000, 180,000, and 220,000 seeds acre<sup>−1</sup>) in a triple-row configuration on soybean grain yield compared to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre<sup>−1</sup> on two soil textures (silt loam and clay). Both studies were repeated on silt loam and clay soil textures in every site-year. In the first study, the optimal planting date increased soybean grain yield regardless of soil texture. On both soil textures, twin- and single-row configuration yields were equivalent, but triple-row configuration reduced soybean grain yield up to 9%. Similarly, triple-row configuration reduced soybean density and height at R3 and R8 growth stages. In the second study, increasing triple-row configuration soybean seeding rate by at least 38% provided similar soybean grain yields to a single-row configuration at 130,000 seeds acre<sup>−1</sup>. These data indicate that triple-row soybean planting configurations do have some benefits, but that future research should focus on equipment limitations experienced in the current research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paige E. Boyle, Michael D. Richardson, Douglas E. Karcher, Kenneth W. Hignight, Debra Hignight, Margaret E. Secks
The response of tall fescue [Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.], infected with fungal endophytes, and subjected to drought stress has varied, presumably due to variability in host–endophyte associations. Much of this research has focused on forage ecotypes; less is known about the effects of endophytes on managed turfgrasses. The objective of these trials was to determine if the presence of fungal endophytes in turf-type tall fescue provides an advantage to the host grass when exposed to drought conditions. Five endophyte-free and endophyte-infected field populations were established in Fayetteville, AR, and Albany, OR. A greenhouse trial was also established in Albany. Turf was subjected to drought and lightbox photos were evaluated to determine days until 75%, 50%, and 25% green cover. Overall, endophyte infection had no consistent effect on the drought response of tall fescue. Although there was no effect on drought response, endophyte infection in turf may confer other benefits, and may still be a valuable tool for turfgrass management.
{"title":"Endophyte effects on drought tolerance of turf-type tall fescue","authors":"Paige E. Boyle, Michael D. Richardson, Douglas E. Karcher, Kenneth W. Hignight, Debra Hignight, Margaret E. Secks","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20310","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The response of tall fescue [<i>Schedonorus arundinaceus</i> (Schreb.) Dumort.], infected with fungal endophytes, and subjected to drought stress has varied, presumably due to variability in host–endophyte associations. Much of this research has focused on forage ecotypes; less is known about the effects of endophytes on managed turfgrasses. The objective of these trials was to determine if the presence of fungal endophytes in turf-type tall fescue provides an advantage to the host grass when exposed to drought conditions. Five endophyte-free and endophyte-infected field populations were established in Fayetteville, AR, and Albany, OR. A greenhouse trial was also established in Albany. Turf was subjected to drought and lightbox photos were evaluated to determine days until 75%, 50%, and 25% green cover. Overall, endophyte infection had no consistent effect on the drought response of tall fescue. Although there was no effect on drought response, endophyte infection in turf may confer other benefits, and may still be a valuable tool for turfgrass management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142273092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Donnie K. Miller, Priscilla Campos, Josh T. Copes, Melanie Netterville, Sebe Brown, Paul P. Price, David O. Moseley, Thanos Genetimis, Peters Egbedi, Muhammad Rasel Parvej
Field studies in 2019–2020 evaluated the influence of fungicide application on seed quality from delayed harvest (approx. 20, 30, and 44 days after optimum harvest timing, i.e., 13% seed moisture). Treatments included nofungicide, pydiflumetofen plus difenoconazole (13.7 fl oz/acre Miravis Top, Syngenta), or mefentrifluconazole plus pyraclostrobin plus fluxapyroxad (8 fl oz/acre Revytek, BASF). Effect of environment was investigated in both field (natural rainfall events) and environmentally controlled growth chambers (79°F or 90°F with 30% or 100% relative humidity and exposed for 48 or 96 h) for potential impacts on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seed quality. Seed quality was based on a rating scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being seeds in good condition and 10 being seeds in poor condition, based on USDA reference images. Fungicide application had no effect on seed quality from delayed harvest or a saturated environment (100% relative humidity). Delaying harvest beyond approximately 20 days past optimum timing can result in reduced seed quality regardless of fungicide application (1.0 to 2.0 vs 4.0 to 8.1 rating). In addition, seedpod exposure averaged across temperature and relative humidity environments for as little as 96 h after optimum harvest timing can result in deteriorating seed quality issues (3.2 vs 1.4 rating) regardless of fungicide application. Results indicate that soybean harvest delayed 20 days after optimum timing and subjected to seasonal rainfall events or seedpods exposed to completely saturated conditions for 96 h associated with a tropical weather event will result in soybean seed quality deterioration regardless of fungicide application.
{"title":"Influence of fungicide on soybean seed quality from delayed harvest and environment","authors":"Donnie K. Miller, Priscilla Campos, Josh T. Copes, Melanie Netterville, Sebe Brown, Paul P. Price, David O. Moseley, Thanos Genetimis, Peters Egbedi, Muhammad Rasel Parvej","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field studies in 2019–2020 evaluated the influence of fungicide application on seed quality from delayed harvest (approx. 20, 30, and 44 days after optimum harvest timing, i.e., 13% seed moisture). Treatments included nofungicide, pydiflumetofen plus difenoconazole (13.7 fl oz/acre Miravis Top, Syngenta), or mefentrifluconazole plus pyraclostrobin plus fluxapyroxad (8 fl oz/acre Revytek, BASF). Effect of environment was investigated in both field (natural rainfall events) and environmentally controlled growth chambers (79°F or 90°F with 30% or 100% relative humidity and exposed for 48 or 96 h) for potential impacts on soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] seed quality. Seed quality was based on a rating scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being seeds in good condition and 10 being seeds in poor condition, based on USDA reference images. Fungicide application had no effect on seed quality from delayed harvest or a saturated environment (100% relative humidity). Delaying harvest beyond approximately 20 days past optimum timing can result in reduced seed quality regardless of fungicide application (1.0 to 2.0 vs 4.0 to 8.1 rating). In addition, seedpod exposure averaged across temperature and relative humidity environments for as little as 96 h after optimum harvest timing can result in deteriorating seed quality issues (3.2 vs 1.4 rating) regardless of fungicide application. Results indicate that soybean harvest delayed 20 days after optimum timing and subjected to seasonal rainfall events or seedpods exposed to completely saturated conditions for 96 h associated with a tropical weather event will result in soybean seed quality deterioration regardless of fungicide application.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142233213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brendan Zurweller, Yangyang Song, Andrew Dygert, Jac Varco, Bryan Whittenton, Justin May, Brad Burgess
The average U.S. peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield has increased by approximately 25% with the adoption of peanut cultivar ‘Georgia-06G’. Since this adoption, many new high yielding runner cultivars with similar yield potential have been released. However, current nutrient recommendations are based on soil tests that were developed prior to the release of Georgia-06G. Particularly for potassium, current soil test potassium (STK) critical values were established on soil textures with relatively low cation exchange capacity (CEC) but were not validated on soil textures with high CEC. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and yield response of five recently released peanut cultivars to four STK levels ranging from very low to medium based on Mississippi State University Extension soil testing recommendations. The STK classification levels were also based on two soil series categorized with high CEC—Leeper (∼38.4 meq 100 g−1) and Marietta (∼15.9 meq 100 g−1) soil series. Cultivars Georgia-06G, ‘Georgia-16HO’, ‘Georgia-18RU’, FloRun ‘331’, and ‘AU-NPL-17’ were evaluated in this study. No STK × variety interaction occurred, indicating similar K requirements across all varieties evaluated. However, a positive pod yield response occurred in both soil types when the average STK increased from 128 to 167 lbs ac−1 for all cultivars and site years. Critical STK values on both soils were greater than many current Extension recommendations, and the critical STK value of Leeper is greater than the Marietta soil series, likely due to the higher CEC value. These results demonstrate the need to adjust peanut STK sufficiency levels based on soil CEC. Further evaluation of modern peanut cultivar productivity response to STK sufficiency levels is needed for soils with moderate CEC.
{"title":"Peanut cultivar response to residual soil test potassium in North Mississippi","authors":"Brendan Zurweller, Yangyang Song, Andrew Dygert, Jac Varco, Bryan Whittenton, Justin May, Brad Burgess","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20312","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The average U.S. peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) yield has increased by approximately 25% with the adoption of peanut cultivar ‘Georgia-06G’. Since this adoption, many new high yielding runner cultivars with similar yield potential have been released. However, current nutrient recommendations are based on soil tests that were developed prior to the release of Georgia-06G. Particularly for potassium, current soil test potassium (STK) critical values were established on soil textures with relatively low cation exchange capacity (CEC) but were not validated on soil textures with high CEC. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and yield response of five recently released peanut cultivars to four STK levels ranging from very low to medium based on Mississippi State University Extension soil testing recommendations. The STK classification levels were also based on two soil series categorized with high CEC—Leeper (∼38.4 meq 100 g<sup>−1</sup>) and Marietta (∼15.9 meq 100 g<sup>−1</sup>) soil series. Cultivars Georgia-06G, ‘Georgia-16HO’, ‘Georgia-18RU’, FloRun ‘331’, and ‘AU-NPL-17’ were evaluated in this study. No STK × variety interaction occurred, indicating similar K requirements across all varieties evaluated. However, a positive pod yield response occurred in both soil types when the average STK increased from 128 to 167 lbs ac<sup>−1</sup> for all cultivars and site years. Critical STK values on both soils were greater than many current Extension recommendations, and the critical STK value of Leeper is greater than the Marietta soil series, likely due to the higher CEC value. These results demonstrate the need to adjust peanut STK sufficiency levels based on soil CEC. Further evaluation of modern peanut cultivar productivity response to STK sufficiency levels is needed for soils with moderate CEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142233211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. J. Hurry, R. A. Vann, K. D Stowe, G. D. Collins, C. W. Cahoon, D. Anderson, B. Barrow, A. Baucom, T. Britton, J. Carleo, T. Coggins, P. Flowers, A. Gibbs, R. Gurganus, T. Hambrick, M. Huffman, D. King, M. Malloy, M. Place, H. Rhodes, M. Seitz, B. Szilvay, M. S. Tilley, J. Waters, L. Worden, L. Lux
North Carolina soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] producers have shifted to earlier planting dates as a mechanism to increase soybean yields. As growers have shifted to earlier planting dates, soybean fungicide seed treatment use has become more common. In 2020 and 2021, on-farm research investigated the value of a fungicide seed treatment across the state. Experiments were conducted across 18 diverse production environments in North Carolina during that time. Treatments included fungicide seed treatment (fludioxonil: 2.32%, mefenoxam: 13.9%, and sedaxane: 2.32%, i.e., Vibrance Trio, a commonly used multi-mode of action fungicide across the state and country) compared to untreated seed. Data collected included soybean stand and soybean yield. The use of a fungicide seed treatment variably affected stand, but when combined over environments, fungicide seed treated plots averaged 110,757 plants/acre as opposed to untreated plots averaging 101,570 plants/acre with significant stand protection in seven of 18 environments. When averaged across environments, fungicide seed treatment protected yield by 1.3 bu/acre which, depending on input practices and soybean selling price, would border providing a return on investment. As planting date was delayed past mid-April, yield decreased for both fungicide treated and untreated plots. Results from this trial indicate that fungicide seed treatments can provide protection of soybean yield and stand in North Carolina although protection provided may not provide a return on investment with current input prices.
{"title":"Soybean stand and yield impact from a fungicide seed treatment in North Carolina soybean production","authors":"J. J. Hurry, R. A. Vann, K. D Stowe, G. D. Collins, C. W. Cahoon, D. Anderson, B. Barrow, A. Baucom, T. Britton, J. Carleo, T. Coggins, P. Flowers, A. Gibbs, R. Gurganus, T. Hambrick, M. Huffman, D. King, M. Malloy, M. Place, H. Rhodes, M. Seitz, B. Szilvay, M. S. Tilley, J. Waters, L. Worden, L. Lux","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20311","url":null,"abstract":"<p>North Carolina soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] producers have shifted to earlier planting dates as a mechanism to increase soybean yields. As growers have shifted to earlier planting dates, soybean fungicide seed treatment use has become more common. In 2020 and 2021, on-farm research investigated the value of a fungicide seed treatment across the state. Experiments were conducted across 18 diverse production environments in North Carolina during that time. Treatments included fungicide seed treatment (fludioxonil: 2.32%, mefenoxam: 13.9%, and sedaxane: 2.32%, i.e., Vibrance Trio, a commonly used multi-mode of action fungicide across the state and country) compared to untreated seed. Data collected included soybean stand and soybean yield. The use of a fungicide seed treatment variably affected stand, but when combined over environments, fungicide seed treated plots averaged 110,757 plants/acre as opposed to untreated plots averaging 101,570 plants/acre with significant stand protection in seven of 18 environments. When averaged across environments, fungicide seed treatment protected yield by 1.3 bu/acre which, depending on input practices and soybean selling price, would border providing a return on investment. As planting date was delayed past mid-April, yield decreased for both fungicide treated and untreated plots. Results from this trial indicate that fungicide seed treatments can provide protection of soybean yield and stand in North Carolina although protection provided may not provide a return on investment with current input prices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20311","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142233212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David L. Jordan, P. Dewayne Johnson, Andrew Hare, Ethan Foote, Randy Wells, Maria Balota, Billy Barrow, Lance Grimes, Craig Ellison, Della King, Zachary Parker, Michael Brake, Stephen Deal, Brian Stevens, Tommy Corbett, Ivy Lanier, Lloyd Ransom
{"title":"Peanut response to single and sequential applications of prohexadione calcium","authors":"David L. Jordan, P. Dewayne Johnson, Andrew Hare, Ethan Foote, Randy Wells, Maria Balota, Billy Barrow, Lance Grimes, Craig Ellison, Della King, Zachary Parker, Michael Brake, Stephen Deal, Brian Stevens, Tommy Corbett, Ivy Lanier, Lloyd Ransom","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20309","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarala Giri, John D. Mueller, Saleh M. Ahmed, Justin B. Hiers, Benjamin B. Fogle, Kendall R. Kirk, Weimin Ye, Daniel J. Anco
<p>Peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) is a worldwide crop rich in protein (25.8%), fat (49.2%), and nutritional value (Kokalis-Bruelle et al., <span>1997</span>; USDA-ARS, <span>2019</span>). The United States is the fourth-largest peanut producing country after China, India, and Nigeria (USDA-FAS, <span>2024</span>) and has produced 143,000 tons in 2021 (USDA-NASS, <span>2022</span>). South Carolina is ranked sixth in peanut production across the United States. The top peanut-producing counties in South Carolina are Orangeburg, Calhoun, Hampton, Darlington, and Marlboro. Root-knot (<i>Meloidogyne arenaria</i>), lesion (<i>Pratylenchus brachyurus</i>), sting (<i>Belonolaimus longicaudatus</i>), and ring (<i>Mesocriconema ornatum</i>) nematodes are all important pathogens of peanut. All four taxa occur in many agricultural fields in South Carolina. Among these, ring nematode is commonly found in high numbers in peanut fields (Barker et al., <span>1982</span>; Dickson, <span>1985</span>). Ring nematodes are obligate ectoparasites abundant in South Carolina's coastal plain region where sandy soils are typical compared to the Piedmont and mountain regions where loamy soils are more predominant (Dickson & Waele, <span>2005</span>). There are >400 species in the Criconemoides family, and there have been longstanding controversies whether to put Criconemoides and Mesocriconema in the same group as they have many similar characteristics. However, they also have important differences (Brzeski et al., <span>2002a, 2002b</span>; Hunt et al., <span>2005</span>). Geraert (<span>2010</span>) reported 400 distinct species in the family Criconematidae (including all ring nematode spp.). At least 90 species of Mesocriconema have been reported worldwide, and at least 12 species have been identified in the United States (Cordero et al., <span>2012</span>; Powers et al., <span>2016</span>) with a wide range of morphometric differences. Most of these species are not considered important plant pathogens. Two species of <i>Mesocriconema</i>, <i>M. xenoplax</i> and <i>M. ornatum</i>, are considered important pathogens of peach [<i>Prunus persica</i> (L.) Batsch] and peanut, respectively. They have very similar appearances and overlapping morphometrics, leading to difficulty in identification (Talton & Crow, <span>2022</span>). Other species of ring nematode, like <i>Criconemella curvata</i> and <i>C. pelerentsi</i>, have been found in peanut fields (Sakwe & Geraert, <span>1991</span>).</p><p>Ring nematode (<i>Criconemoides</i> spp.) was first reported in Georgia peanut fields causing chlorotic symptoms described as groundnut yellows, which were suspected to be caused by <i>Mesocriconema ornatum</i> (Dickson & Waele, <span>2005</span>; Machmer, <span>1953</span>). <i>Mesocriconema ornatum</i> is considered a minor pathogen for many crops, including peanut (Kokalis-Bruelle et al., <span>1997</span>). Occasionally, this nematode has been reported to cau
{"title":"Survey of ring nematode in South Carolina peanut fields","authors":"Sarala Giri, John D. Mueller, Saleh M. Ahmed, Justin B. Hiers, Benjamin B. Fogle, Kendall R. Kirk, Weimin Ye, Daniel J. Anco","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) is a worldwide crop rich in protein (25.8%), fat (49.2%), and nutritional value (Kokalis-Bruelle et al., <span>1997</span>; USDA-ARS, <span>2019</span>). The United States is the fourth-largest peanut producing country after China, India, and Nigeria (USDA-FAS, <span>2024</span>) and has produced 143,000 tons in 2021 (USDA-NASS, <span>2022</span>). South Carolina is ranked sixth in peanut production across the United States. The top peanut-producing counties in South Carolina are Orangeburg, Calhoun, Hampton, Darlington, and Marlboro. Root-knot (<i>Meloidogyne arenaria</i>), lesion (<i>Pratylenchus brachyurus</i>), sting (<i>Belonolaimus longicaudatus</i>), and ring (<i>Mesocriconema ornatum</i>) nematodes are all important pathogens of peanut. All four taxa occur in many agricultural fields in South Carolina. Among these, ring nematode is commonly found in high numbers in peanut fields (Barker et al., <span>1982</span>; Dickson, <span>1985</span>). Ring nematodes are obligate ectoparasites abundant in South Carolina's coastal plain region where sandy soils are typical compared to the Piedmont and mountain regions where loamy soils are more predominant (Dickson & Waele, <span>2005</span>). There are >400 species in the Criconemoides family, and there have been longstanding controversies whether to put Criconemoides and Mesocriconema in the same group as they have many similar characteristics. However, they also have important differences (Brzeski et al., <span>2002a, 2002b</span>; Hunt et al., <span>2005</span>). Geraert (<span>2010</span>) reported 400 distinct species in the family Criconematidae (including all ring nematode spp.). At least 90 species of Mesocriconema have been reported worldwide, and at least 12 species have been identified in the United States (Cordero et al., <span>2012</span>; Powers et al., <span>2016</span>) with a wide range of morphometric differences. Most of these species are not considered important plant pathogens. Two species of <i>Mesocriconema</i>, <i>M. xenoplax</i> and <i>M. ornatum</i>, are considered important pathogens of peach [<i>Prunus persica</i> (L.) Batsch] and peanut, respectively. They have very similar appearances and overlapping morphometrics, leading to difficulty in identification (Talton & Crow, <span>2022</span>). Other species of ring nematode, like <i>Criconemella curvata</i> and <i>C. pelerentsi</i>, have been found in peanut fields (Sakwe & Geraert, <span>1991</span>).</p><p>Ring nematode (<i>Criconemoides</i> spp.) was first reported in Georgia peanut fields causing chlorotic symptoms described as groundnut yellows, which were suspected to be caused by <i>Mesocriconema ornatum</i> (Dickson & Waele, <span>2005</span>; Machmer, <span>1953</span>). <i>Mesocriconema ornatum</i> is considered a minor pathogen for many crops, including peanut (Kokalis-Bruelle et al., <span>1997</span>). Occasionally, this nematode has been reported to cau","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vitor Simionato Bidóia, Yanna Karoline Santos da Costa, Priscila Lupino Gratão, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Stephen Oscar Duke, Leonardo Bianco de Carvalho
The potential adverse effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops are still a matter of controversy. The effects of glyphosate at recommended application rates (either a single application of 580 g ae ha−1 of glyphosate at stage V5 or a sequential application of 580 + 980 g ae ha−1 at stage V3 and V7, respectively) on growth, mineral content, and metabolic parameters of GR maize (Zea mays) were determined in greenhouse and field studies, each replicated in different years. No effects on any growth parameter (including grain yield), mineral content (leaf and grain), grain starch, crude protein, or total lipids were found. The only significant negative effect was a slight reduction in tyrosine content of leaf tissue with the sequential treatment, however, there was no increase in shikimic or quinic acids in leaf tissue with any treatment. In a separate greenhouse experiment, there was no sign of oxidative stress, as determined by levels of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content as well as superoxide dismutase and guaiacol peroxidase activities 4 and 8 days after treatment with 1080 g ha−1 glyphosate. In fact, there was a reduction of MDA in roots of glyphosate-treated plants 4 DAT, indicating reduced oxidative stress. No aminomethylphosphonic acid, the primary degradation product of glyphosate, was found in either leaves or grain of treated plants, and no glyphosate was found in grain of treated plants from the field studies. All the results are consistent with there being no adverse effects of glyphosate on GR maize at recommended application rates.
草甘膦对抗草甘膦(GR)作物的潜在不利影响仍存在争议。我们在温室和田间研究中测定了草甘膦的推荐施用量(在 V5 阶段一次施用 580 g ae ha-1 草甘膦,或在 V3 和 V7 阶段分别连续施用 580 + 980 g ae ha-1 草甘膦)对 GR 玉米(Zea mays)的生长、矿物质含量和代谢参数的影响,每项研究在不同年份重复进行。没有发现任何生长参数(包括谷物产量)、矿物质含量(叶片和谷物)、谷物淀粉、粗蛋白或总脂类受到影响。唯一明显的负面影响是叶片组织中的酪氨酸含量在连续处理中略有减少,但叶片组织中的莽草酸和喹酸含量在任何处理中都没有增加。在另一项温室实验中,根据叶绿素、类胡萝卜素、丙二醛(MDA)含量以及超氧化物歧化酶和愈创木酚过氧化物酶活性测定,草甘膦 1080 克/公顷处理 4 天和 8 天后没有出现氧化应激迹象。事实上,草甘膦处理植物根部的 MDA 在 4 天后有所减少,表明氧化应激有所降低。草甘膦的主要降解产物氨甲基膦酸在处理过的植物的叶片或谷物中均未发现,在田间研究中,处理过的植物的谷物中也未发现草甘膦。所有这些结果都表明,按照建议的施用量,草甘膦不会对 GR 玉米产生不利影响。
{"title":"Effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant maize growth and metabolic parameters in the greenhouse and field","authors":"Vitor Simionato Bidóia, Yanna Karoline Santos da Costa, Priscila Lupino Gratão, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Stephen Oscar Duke, Leonardo Bianco de Carvalho","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20308","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The potential adverse effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops are still a matter of controversy. The effects of glyphosate at recommended application rates (either a single application of 580 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup> of glyphosate at stage V5 or a sequential application of 580 + 980 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup> at stage V3 and V7, respectively) on growth, mineral content, and metabolic parameters of GR maize (<i>Zea mays</i>) were determined in greenhouse and field studies, each replicated in different years. No effects on any growth parameter (including grain yield), mineral content (leaf and grain), grain starch, crude protein, or total lipids were found. The only significant negative effect was a slight reduction in tyrosine content of leaf tissue with the sequential treatment, however, there was no increase in shikimic or quinic acids in leaf tissue with any treatment. In a separate greenhouse experiment, there was no sign of oxidative stress, as determined by levels of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content as well as superoxide dismutase and guaiacol peroxidase activities 4 and 8 days after treatment with 1080 g ha<sup>−1</sup> glyphosate. In fact, there was a reduction of MDA in roots of glyphosate-treated plants 4 DAT, indicating reduced oxidative stress. No aminomethylphosphonic acid, the primary degradation product of glyphosate, was found in either leaves or grain of treated plants, and no glyphosate was found in grain of treated plants from the field studies. All the results are consistent with there being no adverse effects of glyphosate on GR maize at recommended application rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142117936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) is sensitive to high-temperature stress, and approaches that can improve plant growth during summer months are important for golf courses managing P. annua putting greens. The objective of this 2-year field trial was to determine plant health benefits for selected fungicides and the combination with a plant growth regulator (PGR), trinexapac-ethyl (TE) on P. annua growth under putting green conditions during summer months. The following treatments were foliar sprayed at 14-day intervals from June to September in 2020 and 2021: (1) untreated control with water, (2) Daconil Action, (3) Appear II, (4) Daconil Action and Appear II, and (5) Daconil Action, Appear II, and Primo Maxx (TE). Applying individual and combination treatments resulted in significant improvements on P. annua summer performance, as manifested by increased visual turf quality and other vegetation indices evaluated using multispectral radiometer (normalized difference vegetation index, leaf area index, and stress index or digital camera [percent canopy cover and dark green color index]) in both years. The combined treatment programs, Daconil Action and Appear II or Daconil Action, Appear II, and Primo Maxx were more effective than the untreated control and each individual treatment. The results suggest that there existed synergistic effects of multiple fungicides and PGR, which could be particularly useful in promoting plant health of P. annua under heat stress conditions.
一年生蓝草(Poa annua L.)对高温胁迫非常敏感,因此能够改善植物在夏季生长的方法对于管理一年生蓝草果岭的高尔夫球场非常重要。这项为期两年的田间试验旨在确定所选杀菌剂的植物健康效益,以及与植物生长调节剂(PGR)--乙基三乙膦酸(TE)--的组合在夏季推杆果岭条件下对鹅掌楸生长的影响。2020 年和 2021 年 6 月至 9 月期间,每隔 14 天叶面喷洒以下处理:(1)未经处理的清水对照;(2)Daconil Action;(3)Appear II;(4)Daconil Action 和 Appear II;以及(5)Daconil Action、Appear II 和 Primo Maxx(TE)。在这两年中,单独和组合处理可显著改善鹅掌楸的夏季表现,具体表现为草皮视觉质量的提高,以及使用多光谱辐射计(归一化差异植被指数、叶面积指数和压力指数或数码相机[树冠覆盖率和深绿色指数])评估的其他植被指数的提高。Daconil Action 和 Appear II 或 Daconil Action、Appear II 和 Primo Maxx 混合处理方案比未处理对照和每种单独处理方案更有效。结果表明,多种杀菌剂和 PGR 具有协同增效作用,尤其有助于在热胁迫条件下促进菠萝属植物的健康。
{"title":"Plant health effects of fungicides alone and in combination with plant growth regulator on improving summer turf performance in annual bluegrass","authors":"Sean McBride, James A. Murphy, Bingru Huang","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20307","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Annual bluegrass (<i>Poa annua</i> L.) is sensitive to high-temperature stress, and approaches that can improve plant growth during summer months are important for golf courses managing <i>P. annua</i> putting greens. The objective of this 2-year field trial was to determine plant health benefits for selected fungicides and the combination with a plant growth regulator (PGR), trinexapac-ethyl (TE) on <i>P. annua</i> growth under putting green conditions during summer months. The following treatments were foliar sprayed at 14-day intervals from June to September in 2020 and 2021: (1) untreated control with water, (2) Daconil Action, (3) Appear II, (4) Daconil Action and Appear II, and (5) Daconil Action, Appear II, and Primo Maxx (TE). Applying individual and combination treatments resulted in significant improvements on <i>P. annua</i> summer performance, as manifested by increased visual turf quality and other vegetation indices evaluated using multispectral radiometer (normalized difference vegetation index, leaf area index, and stress index or digital camera [percent canopy cover and dark green color index]) in both years. The combined treatment programs, Daconil Action and Appear II or Daconil Action, Appear II, and Primo Maxx were more effective than the untreated control and each individual treatment. The results suggest that there existed synergistic effects of multiple fungicides and PGR, which could be particularly useful in promoting plant health of <i>P. annua</i> under heat stress conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20307","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142100028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Trey Freeland, Drew M. Gholson, Tsz Him Lo, Gurbir Singh, Gurpreet Kaur, Erick J. Larson, Joby M. Prince Czarnecki
The majority of soils in the Mississippi Delta are vertisols, whose shrink–swell behavior makes them prone to waterlogging when subjected to excessive infiltration amounts from conventional management of furrow irrigation. The goal of this investigation was to examine if corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield and quality (test weight, kernel composition, and kernel weight) can be improved in vertisols of this region by widening furrow irrigation spacing while increasing furrow inflow rate proportionally to reduce waterlogging. A research station study at the National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research and an on-farm study near Glen Allan, Mississippi, were conducted from 2021 to 2023. Furrow irrigation spacing treatments in the research station study included 3.3 ft, 6.7 ft, 13.3 ft, and 26.7 ft. The on-farm study included 10 ft, 20 ft, and “tractor track” (alternating between 10 and 30 ft furrow irrigation spacing) treatments. The three years of the research station study showed that the 26.7-ft treatment yielded 8.5% higher than the narrower treatments at the top position of the field (50–100 ft from the topographically higher end of 500 ft furrows). Higher grain protein and kernel weight were observed halfway between two irrigated furrows of the 13.3-ft and 26.7-ft treatments than adjacent to irrigated furrows of any treatment. Corn grain yield in the on-farm study was not significantly different among furrow irrigation spacing treatments. This research demonstrates that furrow irrigation spacing can be widened to at least 26.7 ft in vertisols of the Mississippi Delta without decreasing corn grain yield and quality.
{"title":"Furrow irrigation spacing effects on corn production in vertisols of the Mississippi Delta","authors":"Trey Freeland, Drew M. Gholson, Tsz Him Lo, Gurbir Singh, Gurpreet Kaur, Erick J. Larson, Joby M. Prince Czarnecki","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20306","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The majority of soils in the Mississippi Delta are vertisols, whose shrink–swell behavior makes them prone to waterlogging when subjected to excessive infiltration amounts from conventional management of furrow irrigation. The goal of this investigation was to examine if corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) grain yield and quality (test weight, kernel composition, and kernel weight) can be improved in vertisols of this region by widening furrow irrigation spacing while increasing furrow inflow rate proportionally to reduce waterlogging. A research station study at the National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research and an on-farm study near Glen Allan, Mississippi, were conducted from 2021 to 2023. Furrow irrigation spacing treatments in the research station study included 3.3 ft, 6.7 ft, 13.3 ft, and 26.7 ft. The on-farm study included 10 ft, 20 ft, and “tractor track” (alternating between 10 and 30 ft furrow irrigation spacing) treatments. The three years of the research station study showed that the 26.7-ft treatment yielded 8.5% higher than the narrower treatments at the top position of the field (50–100 ft from the topographically higher end of 500 ft furrows). Higher grain protein and kernel weight were observed halfway between two irrigated furrows of the 13.3-ft and 26.7-ft treatments than adjacent to irrigated furrows of any treatment. Corn grain yield in the on-farm study was not significantly different among furrow irrigation spacing treatments. This research demonstrates that furrow irrigation spacing can be widened to at least 26.7 ft in vertisols of the Mississippi Delta without decreasing corn grain yield and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20306","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142100027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}