首页 > 最新文献

Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management最新文献

英文 中文
Effect of biochar application on corn and soybean yield in Michigan and Ohio 密歇根州和俄亥俄州施用生物炭对玉米和大豆产量的影响
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20245
Gabriela Silva-Pumarada, Raj K. Shrestha, Marília Chiavegato, Kristin Mercer, Benjamin K. Agyei, Maninder P. Singh, Laura E. Lindsey
<p>Biochar soil amendment, a product of anoxic thermochemical conversion of biomass through a pyrolysis process, may help mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural soils (Huang et al., <span>2023</span>; Verheijen et al., <span>2010</span>). Biochar application to field soils include improvements in pH of acidic soils, cation exchange capacity, and water holding capacity (Agegnehu et al., <span>2017</span>; Alkharabsheh et al., <span>2021</span>; Tokas et al., <span>2021</span>; Ye et al., <span>2020</span>).</p><p>Crop yield response to biochar application is variable but has been generally found as neutral or positive, with largest yield responses in acidic soils likely due to a liming effect of the biochar (Huang et al., <span>2023</span>). Although crop yield response to biochar application has been globally studied, there have been limited field studies conducted</p><p>under field conditions in the Midwestern United States. In growing environments similar to Ohio and Michigan, a meta-analysis and modeling approaches found crop yield response to biochar to be small (< 10% across crops and −2.6 to 0.6% for corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) (Aller et al., <span>2018</span>; Huang et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Although there have been previous studies on biochar's effect on corn and soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] yield, farmers in Ohio and Michigan need to understand the potential yield outcomes of biochar application using production practices and crop rotations representative of the region. The objective of this research was to evaluate biochar application on corn and soybean yield.</p><p>A field experiment was established at three locations in Fall 2020 with biochar application and continued in 2021 with corn planting and 2022 with soybean planting. Locations included The Ohio State University (OSU) Western Agricultural Research Station (WARS) near South Charleston, OH (39°51′41.40″ N, 83°40′30.36″ W), OSU Northwest Agricultural Research Station (NWARS) near Custar, OH (41°13′6.6″ N, 83°45′48.24″ W), and Michigan State University (MSU) Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI (42°42′52.41″ N, 84°27′42.40″ W). The soil series are Kokomo (fine, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Argiaquolls), Hoytville (fine, illitic, mesic Mollic Epiaqualfs), and Riddles (fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludalfs)–Hillsdale (coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) complex at WARS, NWARS, and MSU, respectively. Prior to experiment initiation, 20 soil samples were collected from the entire field area, homogenized, and tested for soil properties (Table 1). Based on state guidelines, P, K, Ca, and Mg levels were sufficient (Culman et al., <span>2020</span>).</p><p>The experiment was a randomized complete block design with two treatments (biochar and non-treated control) and four replications. At MSU, plots were 40 ft long by 20 ft wide, and the field was fallow in 2020 due to COVID-19 restrictions. At NWARS and WARS, each plot wa
生物炭土壤改良剂是生物质通过热解过程缺氧热化学转化的产物,可能有助于减少农业土壤的温室气体排放(Huang等人,2023;Verheijen等人,2010年)。田间土壤施用生物炭包括提高酸性土壤的pH值、阳离子交换能力和持水能力(Agegnehu等人,2017;Alkharabsheh等人,2021;Tokas等人,2021年;Ye等人,2020)。作物对施用生物炭的产量反应是可变的,但通常被发现是中性或正的,在酸性土壤中产量响应最大的可能是由于生物炭的石灰效应(Huang et al.,2023)。尽管作物产量对施用生物炭的反应已经在全球范围内进行了研究,但在美国中西部的田间条件下进行的田间研究有限。在类似于俄亥俄州和密歇根州的生长环境中,一项荟萃分析和建模方法发现,作物对生物炭的产量反应很小(作物产量响应<10%,玉米产量响应为-2.6%至0.6%)(Aller et al.,2018;Huang et al.,2023)。尽管之前有关于生物炭对玉米和大豆产量影响的研究,俄亥俄州和密歇根州的农民需要利用该地区的生产实践和作物轮作来了解生物炭应用的潜在产量结果。本研究的目的是评估生物炭在玉米和大豆产量上的应用。2020年秋季,在三个地点进行了生物炭施用的田间试验,并于2021年继续种植玉米,2022年继续种植大豆。地点包括俄亥俄州南查尔斯顿附近的俄亥俄州立大学(OSU)西部农业研究站(WARS)(39°51′41.40〃N,83°40′30.36〃W)、俄亥俄州卡斯特附近的俄亥俄州西北农业研究站和密歇根州东兰辛的密歇根州立大学(MSU)农学农场(42°42′52.41〃N,84°27′42.40〃W)。土壤系列为Kokomo(细粒、混合、超活性、中位典型Argiaquolls)、Hoytville(细粒、illitic、中位Mollic Epiaqualfs)和Riddles(细粒壤土、混合、活跃、中位类型Hapludalfs)-Hillsdale(粗壤土、混合的、活跃的、中位模式Hapludals)复合体,分别位于WARS、NWARS和MSU。在实验开始之前,从整个田地区域收集了20个土壤样本,进行均质化,并测试土壤性质(表1)。根据国家指导方针,P、K、Ca和Mg水平是足够的(Culman等人,2020)。该实验是一个随机完全块设计,有两种处理(生物炭和未处理的对照)和四次重复。在密歇根州立大学,地块长40英尺,宽20英尺,2020年由于新冠肺炎限制,田地休耕。在NWARS和WARS,每个地块长30英尺,宽10英尺,之前的作物是大豆。软木松木衍生的生物炭(Wakefield biochar™; 表2)于2020年秋季在每个位置手工施用,并使用田地耕耘机将整个田地区域耕作至4英寸深。生物炭的施用量为4.5吨英亩-1。作物对施用生物炭的产量反应发生在≥4.5吨英亩-1的速率下(Huang等人,2023)。生产实践如表3所示。在俄亥俄州,月平均温度和累积降水量是从位于NWARS和WARS的气象站获得的(食品、农业和环境科学学院,2022)(图1)。对于密歇根州立大学,获得了东兰辛气象站的天气信息(WeatherWX,2022)。在生长季节,大约每两周收集一次6英寸深的土壤水分,每个地块三次(HydroSense II,Campbell Scientific)。玉米和大豆产量分别调整为15.5%和13.0%的水分含量。由于通过位置相互作用进行处理,因此按位置分析产量。采用Proc-Mixed程序(SAS9.4)评价生物炭对产量的影响。固定效应为生物炭处理,随机效应为复制。方差假设的正态性和同质性没有被违反。玉米产量不受生物炭施用的影响(表4)。同样,在MSU和NWARS,大豆产量不受生物炭施用的影响。然而,在WARS条件下,与对照相比,施用生物炭时大豆产量增加了7.4 bu acre−1。对于大豆来说,在R3至R5生长阶段提供充足的水对于最大限度地提高产量至关重要(Rattalino Edreira等人,2017),这通常发生在7月下旬至8月。2022年8月,WARS的降水量低于平均水平(图1),但生物炭处理的7月28日、8月18日和9月1日的平均土壤湿度(23.4%)高于对照(21.0%)(α=.09)。因此,2022年WARS的产量响应可能是由于生物炭处理中的植物可用水量高于对照。 在一项对不同种植系统使用生物炭的荟萃分析中,研究人员发现,与对照相比,使用生物炭处理的田地的作物产量平均增加15.7%(Huang et al.,2023)。然而,研究人员指出,对生物炭的产量反应是可变的,这取决于环境和土壤特性,作物产量反应是中性的或正的。对于玉米,施用生物炭并没有产生产量反应。在大豆中,三分之一的地方出现了产量反应。虽然使用生物炭可能会带来环境和土壤质量方面的好处,但重要的是要了解生物炭改良和应用成本高对玉米和大豆产量的影响(Sorensen&amp;Lamb,2018)。由于玉米和大豆在田间试验中缺乏产量反应,生物炭在短期内对农民来说可能在经济上不可行。需要进一步研究生物炭对温室气体排放、土壤特性和作物产量的长期影响。Gabriela Silva Pumarada:形式分析;调查书写——原始草稿。Raj K.Shrestha:概念化;融资收购;方法论写作——复习和编辑。玛丽亚·奇亚维加托:方法论;监督;写作——复习和编辑。Kristin Mercer:监督;写作——复习和编辑。Benjamin K.Agyei:调查;写作——原稿。Maninder P.Singh:概念化;融资收购;调查监督;写作——复习和编辑。Laura E.Lindsey:概念化;融资收购;监督;写作——复习和编辑。提交人声明没有利益冲突。
{"title":"Effect of biochar application on corn and soybean yield in Michigan and Ohio","authors":"Gabriela Silva-Pumarada,&nbsp;Raj K. Shrestha,&nbsp;Marília Chiavegato,&nbsp;Kristin Mercer,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Agyei,&nbsp;Maninder P. Singh,&nbsp;Laura E. Lindsey","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20245","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Biochar soil amendment, a product of anoxic thermochemical conversion of biomass through a pyrolysis process, may help mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural soils (Huang et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Verheijen et al., &lt;span&gt;2010&lt;/span&gt;). Biochar application to field soils include improvements in pH of acidic soils, cation exchange capacity, and water holding capacity (Agegnehu et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;; Alkharabsheh et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Tokas et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Ye et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Crop yield response to biochar application is variable but has been generally found as neutral or positive, with largest yield responses in acidic soils likely due to a liming effect of the biochar (Huang et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). Although crop yield response to biochar application has been globally studied, there have been limited field studies conducted&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;under field conditions in the Midwestern United States. In growing environments similar to Ohio and Michigan, a meta-analysis and modeling approaches found crop yield response to biochar to be small (&lt; 10% across crops and −2.6 to 0.6% for corn (&lt;i&gt;Zea mays&lt;/i&gt; L.) (Aller et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;; Huang et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although there have been previous studies on biochar's effect on corn and soybean [&lt;i&gt;Glycine max&lt;/i&gt; (L.) Merr.] yield, farmers in Ohio and Michigan need to understand the potential yield outcomes of biochar application using production practices and crop rotations representative of the region. The objective of this research was to evaluate biochar application on corn and soybean yield.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A field experiment was established at three locations in Fall 2020 with biochar application and continued in 2021 with corn planting and 2022 with soybean planting. Locations included The Ohio State University (OSU) Western Agricultural Research Station (WARS) near South Charleston, OH (39°51′41.40″ N, 83°40′30.36″ W), OSU Northwest Agricultural Research Station (NWARS) near Custar, OH (41°13′6.6″ N, 83°45′48.24″ W), and Michigan State University (MSU) Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI (42°42′52.41″ N, 84°27′42.40″ W). The soil series are Kokomo (fine, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Argiaquolls), Hoytville (fine, illitic, mesic Mollic Epiaqualfs), and Riddles (fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludalfs)–Hillsdale (coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) complex at WARS, NWARS, and MSU, respectively. Prior to experiment initiation, 20 soil samples were collected from the entire field area, homogenized, and tested for soil properties (Table 1). Based on state guidelines, P, K, Ca, and Mg levels were sufficient (Culman et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The experiment was a randomized complete block design with two treatments (biochar and non-treated control) and four replications. At MSU, plots were 40 ft long by 20 ft wide, and the field was fallow in 2020 due to COVID-19 restrictions. At NWARS and WARS, each plot wa","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20245","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50117097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conventional corn tolerance to drift-simulating rates of glyphosate at two growth stages 传统玉米对草甘膦漂移的耐受性模拟了两个生长阶段的草甘膦速率
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20244
Amar S. Godar, Jason K. Norsworthy, L. Tom Barber
{"title":"Conventional corn tolerance to drift-simulating rates of glyphosate at two growth stages","authors":"Amar S. Godar,&nbsp;Jason K. Norsworthy,&nbsp;L. Tom Barber","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20244","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50138945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of nitrogen rate on yield and profitability of rye grain production 施氮量对黑麦产量和效益的影响
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20243
Elżbieta Szuleta, Jordan M. Shockley, Carrie Knott, Timothy Phillips, David A. Van Sanford

Rye (Secale cereale L.) grain production in Kentucky is insufficient to meet the needs of distillers and bakers, in part because there is a knowledge gap about rye management that discourages farmers from choosing this crop. We conducted an economic study to develop recommendations for profitable rye grain production. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of two different nitrogen (N) rates (35 lb N acre−1 and 70 lb N acre−1) on yield and profitability of winter rye grain production. Experiments were conducted in 2020–2021 season at three Kentucky locations: Lexington, Princeton, and Adairville. Twenty-four rye entries were planted in a split plot design experiment and the two N rates (35 lb N acre−1 and 70 lb N acre−1) were assigned to main plots. There was no significant difference in mean yield between 35 and 70 lb N acre−1. This indicates that less investment in N fertilizer will not adversely affect grain yield level, will enhance profitability of production, and will benefit distillers due to the higher alcohol yield associated with higher starch and lower protein levels.

肯塔基州的黑麦(Secale cereale L.)粮食生产不足以满足酿酒师和面包师的需求,部分原因是在黑麦管理方面存在知识差距,阻碍了农民选择这种作物。我们进行了一项经济研究,以制定有利可图的黑麦粮食生产建议。本研究的目的是确定两种不同的施氮量(35 lb N acre−1和70 lb N acres−1)对冬黑麦产量和盈利能力的影响。实验于2020-2021赛季在肯塔基州的三个地点进行:列克星敦、普林斯顿和阿达尔维尔。在一个分块设计实验中种植了24个黑麦条目,并将两个N率(35磅N英亩-1和70磅N英亩−1)分配到主地块。平均产量在35和70磅N英亩-1之间没有显著差异。这表明,减少氮肥投资不会对粮食产量水平产生不利影响,将提高生产的盈利能力,并将使酿酒商受益,因为较高的淀粉和较低的蛋白质水平会带来较高的酒精产量。
{"title":"Influence of nitrogen rate on yield and profitability of rye grain production","authors":"Elżbieta Szuleta,&nbsp;Jordan M. Shockley,&nbsp;Carrie Knott,&nbsp;Timothy Phillips,&nbsp;David A. Van Sanford","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20243","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rye (<i>Secale cereale</i> L.) grain production in Kentucky is insufficient to meet the needs of distillers and bakers, in part because there is a knowledge gap about rye management that discourages farmers from choosing this crop. We conducted an economic study to develop recommendations for profitable rye grain production. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of two different nitrogen (N) rates (35 lb N acre<sup>−1</sup> and 70 lb N acre<sup>−1</sup>) on yield and profitability of winter rye grain production. Experiments were conducted in 2020–2021 season at three Kentucky locations: Lexington, Princeton, and Adairville. Twenty-four rye entries were planted in a split plot design experiment and the two N rates (35 lb N acre<sup>−1</sup> and 70 lb N acre<sup>−1</sup>) were assigned to main plots. There was no significant difference in mean yield between 35 and 70 lb N acre<sup>−1</sup>. This indicates that less investment in N fertilizer will not adversely affect grain yield level, will enhance profitability of production, and will benefit distillers due to the higher alcohol yield associated with higher starch and lower protein levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50152067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corn and soybean planting order decisions impact farm gross revenue 玉米和大豆种植订单决策影响农场总收入
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20242
Spyridon Mourtzinis, Shawn P. Conley

The inter-annual corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation field is a well-known management practice that increases the yield of both crops across the midwestern United States. Each spring, farmers must decide which crop will be planted first. Prioritizing the planting of one crop can delay planting of the other, which can result in substantial yield loss and reduced associated revenue. The objective of this work was to assess how gross farm revenue (corn + soybean acres) can be affected by crop planting order (corn first, soybean second, and vice versa). The impact of variable planting dates on the yield of each crop was simulated for 310 fields across the United States. Gross farm revenue was estimated as a function of crop planting date, order, input costs and crop prices. In a randomly chosen field in south central Wisconsin, 1 out of the 310, delaying planting after May 1 reduced yield of each crop and subsequently suppressed gross farm revenue. Crop planting order determined farm revenue due to a variable loss in per day yield rate within the nominal planting timeframe associated with the two crops. In addition, the degree to which management intensified for each crop relative to crop yield potential accruing with earlier planting varied by state and further impacted farm revenue. Overall results suggest that to determine planting order, US farmers need to be aware of the comparative yield trends associated with delayed planting of corn vs. soybean for their specific farms and cropping systems and should also account for projected crop selling prices.

玉米(Zea mays L.)-大豆(Glycine max(L.)Merr.]轮作是一种众所周知的管理做法,可以提高美国中西部两种作物的产量。每年春天,农民必须决定首先种植哪种作物。优先种植一种作物可能会推迟另一种作物的种植,这可能会导致大量产量损失和相关收入减少。这项工作的目的是评估农业总收入(玉米+大豆英亩)如何受到作物种植顺序的影响(玉米优先,大豆其次,反之亦然)。对美国310块田地模拟了不同种植日期对每种作物产量的影响。农场总收入是根据作物种植日期、订单、投入成本和作物价格估算的。在威斯康星州中南部的一块随机选择的田地里,310块田地中有1块在5月1日之后推迟种植,降低了每种作物的产量,随后抑制了农场总收入。作物种植顺序决定了农场收入,因为在与这两种作物相关的名义种植时间内,每天的产量发生了可变损失。此外,相对于早期种植带来的作物产量潜力,每种作物的管理强化程度因州而异,并进一步影响了农场收入。总体结果表明,为了确定种植顺序,美国农民需要了解其特定农场和种植系统中玉米与大豆延迟种植的相对产量趋势,还应考虑预计的作物销售价格。
{"title":"Corn and soybean planting order decisions impact farm gross revenue","authors":"Spyridon Mourtzinis,&nbsp;Shawn P. Conley","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20242","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The inter-annual corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)–soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation field is a well-known management practice that increases the yield of both crops across the midwestern United States. Each spring, farmers must decide which crop will be planted first. Prioritizing the planting of one crop can delay planting of the other, which can result in substantial yield loss and reduced associated revenue. The objective of this work was to assess how gross farm revenue (corn + soybean acres) can be affected by crop planting order (corn first, soybean second, and vice versa). The impact of variable planting dates on the yield of each crop was simulated for 310 fields across the United States. Gross farm revenue was estimated as a function of crop planting date, order, input costs and crop prices. In a randomly chosen field in south central Wisconsin, 1 out of the 310, delaying planting after May 1 reduced yield of each crop and subsequently suppressed gross farm revenue. Crop planting order determined farm revenue due to a variable loss in per day yield rate within the nominal planting timeframe associated with the two crops. In addition, the degree to which management intensified for each crop relative to crop yield potential accruing with earlier planting varied by state and further impacted farm revenue. Overall results suggest that to determine planting order, US farmers need to be aware of the comparative yield trends associated with delayed planting of corn vs. soybean for their specific farms and cropping systems and should also account for projected crop selling prices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20242","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50132668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantification of root lodging damage in corn using uncrewed aerial vehicle imagery 利用无折叠飞行器图像量化玉米根系倒伏损伤
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-07-02 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20241
A. J. Lindsey, B. Allred, L. R. Martinez, Greg Rouse, P. R. Thomison

Accurate quantification of damage associated with root lodging events can help producers assess damage, predict potential yield losses, and help understand potential issues with grain quality that may arise post-harvest (i.e., kernel weight reductions, premature germination on the ear, or vivipary). The objective of this research was to utilize imagery from an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) to accurately quantify crop canopy height, grain yield, and identify trends in imagery data associated with grain quality after root lodging was imposed at multiple growth stages. Simulated corn (Zea mays L.) root lodging experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 with lodging treatments applied at two vegetative or two reproductive growth stages (V10, V14, VT/R1, and R3). At dough stage (R4), visible-color and multispectral images were collected from each trial. Bare fields were also flown in February to obtain baseline elevation data. Imagery data were used to develop digital surface model (DSM) images and used to calculate indices of normalized difference red edge (NDRE) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Individual datapoints within each experimental plot were extracted from the imagery files and were compared to ground-truth measurements. The DSM height values were similar to actual measured heights for most lodging treatments (Adj. R2 = .957). Both NDRE and NDVI exhibited linear trends with height and quality parameters (Adj. R2 = .25–.54), though yield patterns were best described using a quadratic model (Adj. R2 = .42–.60). These procedures hold utility in accurately quantifying canopy height following a root lodging event and hold promise in helping consultants identify yield and grain quality reductions associated with root lodging.

准确量化与根倒伏事件相关的损害可以帮助生产者评估损害,预测潜在的产量损失,并帮助了解收获后可能出现的粮食质量潜在问题(即谷粒重量减轻、穗部过早发芽或胎生)。本研究的目的是利用无人机的图像来准确量化作物冠层高度、粮食产量,并确定在多个生长阶段发生根倒伏后与粮食质量相关的图像数据趋势。2018年和2019年进行了模拟玉米(Zea mays L.)根系倒伏实验,在两个营养生长或两个生殖生长阶段(V10、V14、VT/R1和R3)进行倒伏处理。在面团阶段(R4),从每个试验中收集可见颜色和多光谱图像。2月份还对裸田进行了飞行,以获取基线高程数据。图像数据用于开发数字地表模型(DSM)图像,并用于计算归一化差异红边(NDRE)和归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)。从图像文件中提取每个实验地块内的各个数据点,并将其与地面实况测量值进行比较。DSM高度值与大多数倒伏处理的实际测量高度相似(Adj.R2=.957)。NDRE和NDVI都表现出与高度和质量参数呈线性趋势(Adj.R2=.25-.54),尽管产量模式最好使用二次模型来描述(Adj.R2=0.42-.60)。这些程序在根倒伏事件后准确量化冠层高度方面很有用,并有望帮助顾问确定与根倒伏相关的产量和谷物质量下降。
{"title":"Quantification of root lodging damage in corn using uncrewed aerial vehicle imagery","authors":"A. J. Lindsey,&nbsp;B. Allred,&nbsp;L. R. Martinez,&nbsp;Greg Rouse,&nbsp;P. R. Thomison","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20241","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate quantification of damage associated with root lodging events can help producers assess damage, predict potential yield losses, and help understand potential issues with grain quality that may arise post-harvest (i.e., kernel weight reductions, premature germination on the ear, or vivipary). The objective of this research was to utilize imagery from an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) to accurately quantify crop canopy height, grain yield, and identify trends in imagery data associated with grain quality after root lodging was imposed at multiple growth stages. Simulated corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) root lodging experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 with lodging treatments applied at two vegetative or two reproductive growth stages (V10, V14, VT/R1, and R3). At dough stage (R4), visible-color and multispectral images were collected from each trial. Bare fields were also flown in February to obtain baseline elevation data. Imagery data were used to develop digital surface model (DSM) images and used to calculate indices of normalized difference red edge (NDRE) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Individual datapoints within each experimental plot were extracted from the imagery files and were compared to ground-truth measurements. The DSM height values were similar to actual measured heights for most lodging treatments (Adj. <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .957). Both NDRE and NDVI exhibited linear trends with height and quality parameters (Adj. <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .25–.54), though yield patterns were best described using a quadratic model (Adj. <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .42–.60). These procedures hold utility in accurately quantifying canopy height following a root lodging event and hold promise in helping consultants identify yield and grain quality reductions associated with root lodging.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20241","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50121354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maximizing winter wheat yield through planting date and seeding rate management 通过种植日期和播种率管理最大限度地提高冬小麦产量
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20240
J. Patrick Copeland, Dennis Pennington, Maninder P. Singh

Planting date and seeding rate are two of the most basic and important factors in determining yield potential in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) due to their impact on stand establishment. Timely planting of winter wheat (within a few days after the Hessian fly free date) ensures sufficient time for fall growth and tillering, which are critical for maximizing yield, while adequate seeding rate is necessary to optimize the number of heads per unit area. Field experiments were conducted in Mason, MI during three growing seasons (2020–2022) utilizing five planting dates, ranging from mid-September to mid-November, and five seeding rates ranging from 0.8 to 2.4 million seeds acre−1. There was no interaction between planting date and seeding rate in determining yield. Yields declined by 22–48% from the earliest to the latest planting dates in response to a 33–47% reduction in the number of heads acre−1. Seeding rate did not significantly impact yield except at low seeding rates under delayed planting. Maximum yield was achieved with a seeding rate of 0.93, 1.37, 1.47, 1.54, and 1.85 million seeds acre−1 during the mid-September, late September, mid-October, late October, and mid-November plantings, respectively. Overall, results demonstrated that timely planting of wheat is critical for maximizing yield, with significant yield reductions occurring when planting is delayed, regardless of the seeding rate used. Furthermore, while low seeding rates may be used within the optimal planting window without yield penalty, seeding rates should be progressively increased as planting is delayed to diminish yield loss.

种植日期和播种率是决定冬小麦产量潜力的两个最基本和最重要的因素,因为它们会影响林分的建立。及时种植冬小麦(在黑森州无蝇日后的几天内)可确保有足够的时间进行秋季生长和分蘖,这对最大限度地提高产量至关重要,而适当的播种率对于优化单位面积的穗数是必要的。在密歇根州梅森市的三个生长季节(2020-2022年)进行了田间试验,使用了从9月中旬到11月中旬的五个种植日期,以及从80万到240万种子英亩-1的五种播种率。播种期和播种率在决定产量方面没有相互作用。从最早的种植日期到最晚的种植日期,产量下降了22-48%,因为每英亩1英亩的人头数量减少了33-47%。播种率对产量没有显著影响,但在延迟种植的情况下,播种率较低。在9月中旬、9月下旬、10月中旬、10月下旬和11月中旬的种植中,播种率分别为0.93、1.37、1.47、1.54和185万英亩-1,产量最高。总的来说,研究结果表明,及时种植小麦对最大限度地提高产量至关重要,无论播种率如何,当种植延迟时,产量都会显著下降。此外,虽然可以在最佳种植窗口内使用较低的播种率而不会造成产量损失,但随着种植的延迟,播种率应逐渐增加,以减少产量损失。
{"title":"Maximizing winter wheat yield through planting date and seeding rate management","authors":"J. Patrick Copeland,&nbsp;Dennis Pennington,&nbsp;Maninder P. Singh","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20240","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Planting date and seeding rate are two of the most basic and important factors in determining yield potential in winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) due to their impact on stand establishment. Timely planting of winter wheat (within a few days after the Hessian fly free date) ensures sufficient time for fall growth and tillering, which are critical for maximizing yield, while adequate seeding rate is necessary to optimize the number of heads per unit area. Field experiments were conducted in Mason, MI during three growing seasons (2020–2022) utilizing five planting dates, ranging from mid-September to mid-November, and five seeding rates ranging from 0.8 to 2.4 million seeds acre<sup>−1</sup>. There was no interaction between planting date and seeding rate in determining yield. Yields declined by 22–48% from the earliest to the latest planting dates in response to a 33–47% reduction in the number of heads acre<sup>−1</sup>. Seeding rate did not significantly impact yield except at low seeding rates under delayed planting. Maximum yield was achieved with a seeding rate of 0.93, 1.37, 1.47, 1.54, and 1.85 million seeds acre<sup>−1</sup> during the mid-September, late September, mid-October, late October, and mid-November plantings, respectively. Overall, results demonstrated that timely planting of wheat is critical for maximizing yield, with significant yield reductions occurring when planting is delayed, regardless of the seeding rate used. Furthermore, while low seeding rates may be used within the optimal planting window without yield penalty, seeding rates should be progressively increased as planting is delayed to diminish yield loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20240","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50146726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of a handheld NIRS instrument for determining haylage dry matter 手持式近红外干物质测定仪的评价
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20239
J. H. Cherney, D. J. R. Cherney, M. F. Digman

Accurate forage dry matter (DM) concentration estimation is essential for maximizing animal performance and minimizing feed costs. One possible method of estimating DM for rebalancing rations daily involves the use of hand-held near infrared reflectance spectrometer instruments. The SCiO Cup is one of the hand-held instruments that could be used to estimate forage DM, but a thorough evaluation of its effectiveness has not been conducted. Haylage samples (n = 600) from 143 bunker silos were collected across New York State over three years, and vacuum packed for eventual analysis using a SCiO Cup. Samples ranged from pure alfalfa (Medicago L.) to pure grass but were mostly from mixed species. All but one sample received a DM value estimated from several available calibrations pre-loaded in the device. Sixty samples (representing 10% of the sample population) were too wet or dry to generate a result using the mixed silage calibration. For the remaining 90% of samples, SCiO Cup DM estimates were within 3.22%units of oven DM 80% of the time. Precision of the instrument evaluated with multiple scanning of samples using the mixed silage calibration was very good, with the average standard deviation of three values of 0.40 (n = 200). The mixed silage calibration was more effective for predicting DM of this set of haylages than either legume or grass silage calibrations.

准确的饲料干物质(DM)浓度估计对于最大限度地提高动物性能和最小化饲料成本至关重要。估计每日口粮再平衡DM的一种可能方法是使用手持近红外反射光谱仪。SCiO杯是可用于估计饲料DM的手持式仪器之一,但尚未对其有效性进行彻底评估。在三年的时间里,从纽约州各地的143个料仓中收集了干草样本(n=600),并用SCiO Cup真空包装以进行最终分析。样本范围从纯苜蓿(Medicago L.)到纯草,但大多来自混合物种。除一个样本外,所有样本都收到了根据设备中预加载的几个可用校准估计的DM值。60个样本(占样本总数的10%)太湿或太干,无法使用混合青贮饲料校准产生结果。对于其余90%的样品,SCiO Cup DM估计值在3.22%的烘箱DM单位内,80%的时间。使用混合青贮饲料校准对样品进行多次扫描评估的仪器精度非常好,三个值的平均标准偏差为0.40(n=200)。混合青贮饲料校准在预测这组干草的DM方面比豆类或草青贮饲料校准更有效。
{"title":"Evaluation of a handheld NIRS instrument for determining haylage dry matter","authors":"J. H. Cherney,&nbsp;D. J. R. Cherney,&nbsp;M. F. Digman","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20239","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate forage dry matter (DM) concentration estimation is essential for maximizing animal performance and minimizing feed costs. One possible method of estimating DM for rebalancing rations daily involves the use of hand-held near infrared reflectance spectrometer instruments. The SCiO Cup is one of the hand-held instruments that could be used to estimate forage DM, but a thorough evaluation of its effectiveness has not been conducted. Haylage samples (<i>n</i> = 600) from 143 bunker silos were collected across New York State over three years, and vacuum packed for eventual analysis using a SCiO Cup. Samples ranged from pure alfalfa (<i>Medicago</i> L.) to pure grass but were mostly from mixed species. All but one sample received a DM value estimated from several available calibrations pre-loaded in the device. Sixty samples (representing 10% of the sample population) were too wet or dry to generate a result using the mixed silage calibration. For the remaining 90% of samples, SCiO Cup DM estimates were within 3.22%units of oven DM 80% of the time. Precision of the instrument evaluated with multiple scanning of samples using the mixed silage calibration was very good, with the average standard deviation of three values of 0.40 (<i>n</i> = 200). The mixed silage calibration was more effective for predicting DM of this set of haylages than either legume or grass silage calibrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20239","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50141108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tolerance of little bluestem to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Pennsylvania 宾夕法尼亚州小蓝茎对ACC酶抑制剂的耐受性
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-06-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20236
Peter Landschoot
<p>Little bluestem [<i>Schizachyrium scoparium</i> (Michx.) Nash.] is a warm-season perennial grass that is sometimes planted with fine fescues (<i>Festuca</i> spp.) in infrequently mowed rough areas on golf courses, commonly referred to as naturalized or native grass areas and minimal-mow rough. This native species is often used for its aesthetically pleasing reddish-gold culms and inflorescences during late summer and fall.</p><p>In Pennsylvania, perennial and annual grass weeds invade fine fescue/little bluestem rough, and golf course managers occasionally use postemergence herbicides as control options (Landschoot, <span>2018</span>). ACCase-inhibiting herbicides control a variety of grass weeds, but relatively few studies have examined the effects of these herbicides on little bluestem (Patton et al., <span>2021</span>).</p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of little bluestem to four ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: fenoxaprop, fluazifop, quizalofop, and sethoxydim. Experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 in adjacent areas at the Landscape Management Research Center in University Park, PA. Both experiments were performed in an eight-year-old non-irrigated and non-fertilized stand of strong creeping red fescue (<i>Festuca rubra</i> ssp. <i>rubra</i> Gaudin) ‘Garnet’ and little bluestem ‘Ft. Indiantown Gap-PA Ecotype’ (Ernst Conservation Seed). Little bluestem visual cover in the experiment areas at the time of treatment applications was approximately 50-60%. The stand was mowed once per year in October at 5 inches. Soil at the experiment site is a Hagerstown silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic, Typic Hapludalf), with a pH of 6.4, 38 mg/kg Mehlich-3 P, and 186 mg/kg Mehlich-3 K.</p><p>Herbicide treatments included fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra, 0.57 lb fenoxaprop/gal; Bayer Environmental Science) at 28 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant (Lesco 90/10 Nonionic Surfactant; Lesco Inc.); sethoxydim (Segment II, 1.5 lb sethoxydim/gal; BASF) at 16 fl oz product/acre with methylated seed oil at 1.5 pints/acre (Lesco Methylated Seed Oil; Lesco Inc.); fluazifop (Fusilade II T/O, 2 lb fluazifop/gal; Syngenta Crop Protection LLC) at 16 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant; and quizalofop (Assure II, 0.88 lb quizalofop/gal; Amvac Chemical Corp.) at 12 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant. A non-treated control was included in each experiment. Herbicide treatment rates were based on maximum product label rates for control of grass weeds in fine fescue. All treatments were applied once on June 17, 2021, and June 8, 2022. Application dates coincide with preferred timing for control of grass weeds in central Pennsylvania. Total precipitation during the 2021 and 2022 evaluation periods was 19.7 and 9.7 inches, respectively.</p><p>All herbicide treatments were applied using a backpack sprayer equipped with a boom fitted with a 9504E flat fan nozzle (TeeJet Technologies) at 40 psi with a wa
小蓝茎[Schizachyrium scopearium(Michx.)Nash]是一种温暖季节的多年生草本植物,有时在高尔夫球场上不常修剪的粗糙区域种植细羊茅(Festuca spp.),通常被称为归化或原生草地和最小修剪粗糙区域。这种本地物种在夏末和秋季经常因其美观的红金色茎和花序而被使用。在宾夕法尼亚州,多年生和一年生杂草入侵细羊茅/小蓝茎粗茅,高尔夫球场管理人员偶尔会使用出苗后除草剂作为控制选择(Landschoot,2018)。ACC酶抑制剂可控制多种杂草,但相对较少的研究检测这些除草剂对小蓝茎的影响(Patton et al.,2021)。本研究的目的是评估小蓝茎对四种ACC酶抑制剂的耐受性:芬诺沙普、氟嗪福普、喹唑洛普和sethoxydim。实验于2021年和2022年在宾夕法尼亚州大学公园的景观管理研究中心的邻近地区进行。这两项实验都是在一个八年生的未灌溉和未施肥的强匍匐红羊茅(Festuca rubra ssp.rubra Gaudin)“石榴石”和小蓝茎“Ft。Indiantown Gap PA Ecotype’(Ernst Conservation Seed)。在应用治疗时,实验区域的小蓝茎视觉覆盖率约为50-60%。该林分每年10月修剪一次,修剪高度为5英寸。实验场地的土壤为Hagerstown粉质亚粘土(细、混合、中、典型Hapludalf),pH为6.4,38 mg/kg Mehlich-3 P和186 mg/kg Mehlch-3 K。除草剂处理包括含0.25%v/v非离子表面活性剂(Lesco 90/10 Nonionic表面活性剂;Lesco股份有限公司)的28 fl oz产品/英亩的芬诺沙普(Acclaim Extra,0.57 lb芬诺沙普/加仑;Bayer Environmental Science);sethoxydim(Segment II,1.5磅sethoxydim/gal;BASF),16液盎司产品/英亩,甲基化籽油1.5品脱/英亩(Lesco甲基化籽油;Lesco股份有限公司);fluazifop(Fusilade II T/O,2 lb fluazifop/gal;Syngenta Crop Protection LLC),16 fl oz产品/英亩,含0.25%v/v非离子表面活性剂;和具有0.25%v/v非离子表面活性剂的12 fl oz产品/英亩的喹唑洛福(Assure II,0.88磅喹唑洛佛/加仑;Amvac Chemical Corp.)。在每个实验中包括一个未处理的对照。除草剂处理率基于控制细羊茅杂草的最大产品标签率。所有治疗分别于2021年6月17日和2022年6月8日进行一次。应用日期与宾夕法尼亚州中部控制杂草的首选时间一致。2021年和2022年评估期间的总降水量分别为19.7英寸和9.7英寸。所有除草剂处理都是使用背包式喷雾器进行的,该喷雾器配备有装有9504E平风扇喷嘴(TeeJet Technologies)的吊杆,压力为40磅/平方英寸,水量为87加仑/英亩。实验设计是一个随机的完全组,每次治疗重复三次。地块面积为30平方英尺。评估除草剂对小蓝茎的影响的标准包括叶片损伤的视觉评级,以及具有支撑茎高和产量测量的花序。2021年6月30日和7月27日以及2022年6月21日和7日22日进行了叶片损伤评级,0表示没有损伤,10表示叶片完全干燥。2021年9月15日和2022年9月1日,通过测量每个地块10株植物中心最高的花序和支撑茎来评估茎/花序高度。产量是通过在2021年9月25日和2022年9月15日收获每个地块叶冠上方的所有秆/花序并在收获后立即称重来确定的。在SAS 9.3版中,使用PROC-MIXED对所有数据进行方差分析,并在α=0.05时使用Fisher保护的最小显著差异检验对平均值进行分离。在2021年和2022年的所有评级日期,乙氧基丁、氟嗪福普和喹唑洛普处理对小蓝茎叶造成了明显伤害(表1和表2)。仅在2021年6月30日,芬太尼产生的叶片损伤等级高于对照,损伤症状轻微(叶尖变红)。2021年6月30日和2022年6月21日,司他西丁治疗的损伤评级高于所有其他治疗。然而,到2021年7月27日,在sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理之间,没有观察到叶片损伤的差异,并且损伤表现为中度至重度叶片干燥。2022年7月22日,sethoxydim治疗产生的损伤评级高于氟嗪福普,喹唑洛普的损伤评级与sethoxydim和氟嗪福普治疗没有差异。与对照组相比,2021年和2022年,所有除草剂处理都降低了秆/花序高度(表1和表2)。 2021年,Sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理对秆/花序具有相似的效果,使高度降低&gt;相对于对照为50%。2021年,非诺沙普处理的高度降低介于对照和其他除草剂处理之间。2022年,sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理的茎/花序高度降低了&gt;与对照组相比50%;然而,氟嗪福普治疗对身高的降低作用比喹唑洛普更强。与2021年一样,2022年的芬诺沙普处理导致了介于对照和其他除草剂处理之间的高度降低。与2021年和2022年的对照相比,所有除草剂处理的茎秆/花序产量都较低(表1和表2)。2021年,收益率下降了&gt;相对于对照,所有除草剂处理的降幅为50%,其中sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理的降幅最大。芬诺沙普处理产生的产量介于对照和sethoxydim和fluazifop处理之间,而喹唑洛普处理的产量与sethoxydim、fluazifo普和芬诺沙普无差异。2022年,sethoxydim和fluazifop处理的减产幅度最大,其次是quizalofop。芬诺沙普的产量高于所有其他除草剂处理。本研究结果表明,抑制ACC酶的除草剂sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop,以及较小程度的fenoxprop,会引起小叶损伤,并抑制小蓝茎的茎/花序发育。与2022年相比,2021年的降雨量更高,以及试验地点之间土壤条件和其他因素的细微变化,可能是各年份叶片损伤、茎秆/花序高度和产量平均值的差异。在大多数情况下,sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop对小蓝茎植物的伤害和发育迟缓程度高于非诺沙普。这些发现与Patton等人。(2021)其中sethoxydim导致&gt;对小蓝茎植物造成30%的伤害。从业者应该意识到,当用于控制小蓝茎/细羊茅混合区的杂草时,应用抑制ACC酶的除草剂sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop可能对小蓝茎有害。Peter Landschool:概念化、数据管理、形式分析、资金获取、调查、方法论、项目管理、写作——初稿。提交人声明没有利益冲突。
{"title":"Tolerance of little bluestem to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Pennsylvania","authors":"Peter Landschoot","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20236","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Little bluestem [&lt;i&gt;Schizachyrium scoparium&lt;/i&gt; (Michx.) Nash.] is a warm-season perennial grass that is sometimes planted with fine fescues (&lt;i&gt;Festuca&lt;/i&gt; spp.) in infrequently mowed rough areas on golf courses, commonly referred to as naturalized or native grass areas and minimal-mow rough. This native species is often used for its aesthetically pleasing reddish-gold culms and inflorescences during late summer and fall.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Pennsylvania, perennial and annual grass weeds invade fine fescue/little bluestem rough, and golf course managers occasionally use postemergence herbicides as control options (Landschoot, &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;). ACCase-inhibiting herbicides control a variety of grass weeds, but relatively few studies have examined the effects of these herbicides on little bluestem (Patton et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of little bluestem to four ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: fenoxaprop, fluazifop, quizalofop, and sethoxydim. Experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 in adjacent areas at the Landscape Management Research Center in University Park, PA. Both experiments were performed in an eight-year-old non-irrigated and non-fertilized stand of strong creeping red fescue (&lt;i&gt;Festuca rubra&lt;/i&gt; ssp. &lt;i&gt;rubra&lt;/i&gt; Gaudin) ‘Garnet’ and little bluestem ‘Ft. Indiantown Gap-PA Ecotype’ (Ernst Conservation Seed). Little bluestem visual cover in the experiment areas at the time of treatment applications was approximately 50-60%. The stand was mowed once per year in October at 5 inches. Soil at the experiment site is a Hagerstown silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic, Typic Hapludalf), with a pH of 6.4, 38 mg/kg Mehlich-3 P, and 186 mg/kg Mehlich-3 K.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Herbicide treatments included fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra, 0.57 lb fenoxaprop/gal; Bayer Environmental Science) at 28 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant (Lesco 90/10 Nonionic Surfactant; Lesco Inc.); sethoxydim (Segment II, 1.5 lb sethoxydim/gal; BASF) at 16 fl oz product/acre with methylated seed oil at 1.5 pints/acre (Lesco Methylated Seed Oil; Lesco Inc.); fluazifop (Fusilade II T/O, 2 lb fluazifop/gal; Syngenta Crop Protection LLC) at 16 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant; and quizalofop (Assure II, 0.88 lb quizalofop/gal; Amvac Chemical Corp.) at 12 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant. A non-treated control was included in each experiment. Herbicide treatment rates were based on maximum product label rates for control of grass weeds in fine fescue. All treatments were applied once on June 17, 2021, and June 8, 2022. Application dates coincide with preferred timing for control of grass weeds in central Pennsylvania. Total precipitation during the 2021 and 2022 evaluation periods was 19.7 and 9.7 inches, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All herbicide treatments were applied using a backpack sprayer equipped with a boom fitted with a 9504E flat fan nozzle (TeeJet Technologies) at 40 psi with a wa","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20236","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50119643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ancient spring wheat production in Wyoming 怀俄明州古代春小麦生产
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20237
Raksha K. Thapa, Carrie Eberle, Caitlin Youngquist

The ancient wheats einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.), emmer (Triticum turgidum L.), and spelt (Triticum spelta L.) are currently attracting renewed consumer interest due to their unique flavor profiles and high nutritional quality compared with modern bread (Triticum aestivum L.) and durum (Triticum durum L.) wheat. Ancient wheats are well suited for production in marginal lands and may be well adapted to Wyoming growing conditions. A 2-year study was conducted in three locations in Wyoming (Powell, Sheridan, and Lingle, WY) under irrigated and rainfed conditions to identify the agronomic potential of spring planted spelt, emmer, and einkorn in Wyoming. Across locations, grain yields averaged 832 lbs acre−1 for einkorn, 1,492 lbs acre−1 for emmer, and 1064 lbs acre−1 for spelt with 14.7–15.9% protein. In 2017, irrigated spring wheat yield in Wyoming averaged 3642 lbs acre−1 and dryland yield averaged 1020 lbs acre−1. The Powell irrigated location was the highest yielding and perhaps the best suited for ancient wheat production. Continued research on variety selection and management is needed to further improve the yield and profitability of ancient wheats in Wyoming.

与现代面包(小麦)和硬粒小麦(硬粒小麦)相比,古老的小麦因其独特的风味和高营养质量而重新吸引了消费者的兴趣。古老的小麦非常适合在边缘地区生产,可能很适合怀俄明州的生长条件。在怀俄明州的三个地点(Powell、Sheridan和WY的Lingle),在灌溉和降雨条件下进行了一项为期2年的研究,以确定怀俄明州春季种植的spelt、emmer和einkorn的农艺潜力。在不同地区,蛋白质含量为14.7–15.9%的小麦平均产量分别为832磅英亩-1、1492磅英亩-1和1064磅英亩-1。2017年,怀俄明州灌溉春小麦产量平均为3642磅英亩-1,旱地产量平均为1020磅英亩-1。鲍威尔灌溉地是产量最高的地方,也许也是最适合古代小麦生产的地方。需要继续研究品种选择和管理,以进一步提高怀俄明州古代小麦的产量和盈利能力。
{"title":"Ancient spring wheat production in Wyoming","authors":"Raksha K. Thapa,&nbsp;Carrie Eberle,&nbsp;Caitlin Youngquist","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20237","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ancient wheats einkorn (<i>Triticum monococcum</i> L.), emmer (<i>Triticum turgidum</i> L.), and spelt (<i>Triticum spelta</i> L.) are currently attracting renewed consumer interest due to their unique flavor profiles and high nutritional quality compared with modern bread (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) and durum (<i>Triticum durum</i> L.) wheat. Ancient wheats are well suited for production in marginal lands and may be well adapted to Wyoming growing conditions. A 2-year study was conducted in three locations in Wyoming (Powell, Sheridan, and Lingle, WY) under irrigated and rainfed conditions to identify the agronomic potential of spring planted spelt, emmer, and einkorn in Wyoming. Across locations, grain yields averaged 832 lbs acre<sup>−1</sup> for einkorn, 1,492 lbs acre<sup>−1</sup> for emmer, and 1064 lbs acre<sup>−1</sup> for spelt with 14.7–15.9% protein. In 2017, irrigated spring wheat yield in Wyoming averaged 3642 lbs acre<sup>−1</sup> and dryland yield averaged 1020 lbs acre<sup>−1</sup>. The Powell irrigated location was the highest yielding and perhaps the best suited for ancient wheat production. Continued research on variety selection and management is needed to further improve the yield and profitability of ancient wheats in Wyoming.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50118260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thanks to reviewers, Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 2022 感谢审稿人,作物、牧草和草坪管理,2022
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20226
{"title":"Thanks to reviewers, Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 2022","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20226","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50155612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1