首页 > 最新文献

Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management最新文献

英文 中文
Influence of storage length on the nutritive value of baleage 贮藏时间对包谷营养价值的影响
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20280
Justin C. Burt, Lisa L. Baxter, Sydney L. Payne, Taylor J. Hendricks, R. Lawton Stewart Jr., Jennifer J. Tucker

High-quality forages can benefit from being harvested as baleage when the environmental conditions are not favorable for dry hay production. Currently, it is recommended that baleage should be fed within 9-months post-harvest; however, mild winters can reduce the demand for these stored forages. Data are limited on the changes in nutritive value of baleage stored beyond the recommended timepoint. Therefore, the objective was to determine the effect of storage length on nutritive value of forage harvested and stored as baleage. This study evaluated baleage harvested from 2016 to 2018 in Tifton, GA, consisting of either bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.), or a mixture of bermudagrass and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Baleage was sampled for nutritive value analysis at 6-weeks and 9- and 12-months post-harvest, with a subset of bales sampled at 24 months. Regardless of forage, crude protein, total digestible nutrients, and in-vitro dry matter digestibility at 48 h were not impacted in bales sampled up to 12-months post-harvest (p > 0.07). However, acid detergent fiber increased when baleage was stored beyond 6 weeks but did not change from 9 to 12 months (p < 0.01). In the subset of bales stored up to 24-months post-harvest, all nutritive value parameters evaluated were negatively impacted (p < 0.01). The prolonged storage period may negatively affect the baleage plastic integrity, resulting in a decline in nutritive value if anaerobic conditions are not maintained. Future research is warranted to evaluate the changes in the fermentation profile of baleage under extended storage conditions.

当环境条件不利于干草生产时,高质量的饲草可以通过捆包收获而获益。目前,建议在收获后 9 个月内饲喂包谷;但是,温和的冬季会减少对这些贮存饲草的需求。关于包谷在建议时间点之后的营养价值变化的数据很有限。因此,本研究的目的是确定贮藏时间对收获并贮藏成捆的饲草营养价值的影响。本研究评估了 2016 年至 2018 年在佐治亚州蒂夫顿收获的包谷,包括百慕大草(Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.)或百慕大草与紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的混合物。在收割后 6 周、9 个月和 12 个月时对草捆进行取样,进行营养价值分析,并在 24 个月时对部分草捆取样。不论是哪种饲草,收获后 12 个月内取样的草捆中的粗蛋白、可消化总养分和 48 小时体外干物质消化率都没有受到影响(p > 0.07)。然而,当草捆存放超过 6 周时,酸性洗涤纤维会增加,但在 9 至 12 个月期间没有变化(p < 0.01)。在收获后储存长达 24 个月的包谷子集中,所有营养价值评估参数都受到了负面影响(p < 0.01)。如果不保持厌氧条件,延长贮存期可能会对包材的塑性完整性产生负面影响,导致营养价值下降。今后有必要开展研究,以评估在延长储藏条件下包谷发酵情况的变化。
{"title":"Influence of storage length on the nutritive value of baleage","authors":"Justin C. Burt,&nbsp;Lisa L. Baxter,&nbsp;Sydney L. Payne,&nbsp;Taylor J. Hendricks,&nbsp;R. Lawton Stewart Jr.,&nbsp;Jennifer J. Tucker","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20280","url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-quality forages can benefit from being harvested as baleage when the environmental conditions are not favorable for dry hay production. Currently, it is recommended that baleage should be fed within 9-months post-harvest; however, mild winters can reduce the demand for these stored forages. Data are limited on the changes in nutritive value of baleage stored beyond the recommended timepoint. Therefore, the objective was to determine the effect of storage length on nutritive value of forage harvested and stored as baleage. This study evaluated baleage harvested from 2016 to 2018 in Tifton, GA, consisting of either bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> L. Pers.), or a mixture of bermudagrass and alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.). Baleage was sampled for nutritive value analysis at 6-weeks and 9- and 12-months post-harvest, with a subset of bales sampled at 24 months. Regardless of forage, crude protein, total digestible nutrients, and in-vitro dry matter digestibility at 48 h were not impacted in bales sampled up to 12-months post-harvest (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.07). However, acid detergent fiber increased when baleage was stored beyond 6 weeks but did not change from 9 to 12 months (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). In the subset of bales stored up to 24-months post-harvest, all nutritive value parameters evaluated were negatively impacted (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The prolonged storage period may negatively affect the baleage plastic integrity, resulting in a decline in nutritive value if anaerobic conditions are not maintained. Future research is warranted to evaluate the changes in the fermentation profile of baleage under extended storage conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20280","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141097912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can cotton seed size mitigate preemergence herbicides injury? 棉花种子大小能否减轻芽前除草剂的伤害?
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20286
Sarah K. Holladay, Michael W. Marshall, Michael T. Plumblee, Michael A. Jones, Sruthi Narayanan, Matthew D. Inman

Preemergence herbicides (PRE) have become integral for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), especially with the prevalence of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.). However, PRE herbicides have the potential to injure cotton seedlings. Previous research has shown that a larger seed size can compensate for early season stresses which could mitigate potential PRE herbicide injury. In this study, we evaluated growth and yield of two cotton varieties with different seed sizes (large and small) in response to three PRE herbicides alone and in combination. Percent visual injury, biomass, plant heights, stand counts, lint yield, and fiber quality were obtained to make comparisons between seed sizes and PRE treatments. In both years, the large-seeded variety had a higher biomass at 3-leaf stage. However, both varieties had “grown out” of the herbicide injury at 42 days after planting and the early season vigor of the larger seed did not result in higher lint yield. The small-seeded variety had greater yield in both years of the study. This may be due to the genetics or yield potential of the small-seeded variety, or bolls containing smaller seeds typically have a greater number of seeds with more opportunity for lint production. Cotton treated with diuron had the most visual injury and decreased biomass. The results from this study will allow growers to make more informed decisions with regards to seed size, vigor, and PRE herbicide choices. If crop injury is likely, a larger seeded cotton variety may mitigate potential early season injury; however, seed size did not have an impact on final lint yield.

萌芽前除草剂(PRE)已成为棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)除草不可或缺的手段,尤其是在抗草甘膦的帕尔默苋(Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.)盛行的情况下。然而,PRE 除草剂有可能伤害棉花幼苗。以前的研究表明,较大的种子尺寸可以补偿早期季节的压力,从而减轻 PRE 除草剂可能造成的伤害。在这项研究中,我们评估了两个种子大小不同(大种子和小种子)的棉花品种的生长和产量对三种预除草剂单独使用和混合使用的反应。通过比较种子大小和预除草剂处理之间的视觉伤害百分比、生物量、株高、株数、皮棉产量和纤维质量,我们得出了结果。在这两年中,大粒种子品种在 3 叶期的生物量更高。然而,这两个品种在播种后 42 天就已 "长出 "除草剂伤害,大粒种子的早期活力并没有带来更高的皮棉产量。在两年的研究中,小粒种子品种的产量更高。这可能是由于小粒种子品种的遗传或产量潜力,也可能是含有较小种子的棉铃通常有更多的种子,有更多的机会生产皮棉。使用噻草隆处理的棉花受到的视觉伤害最大,生物量也有所减少。这项研究的结果将使种植者在种子大小、活力和 PRE 除草剂选择方面做出更明智的决定。如果作物可能受到伤害,种子较大的棉花品种可能会减轻早期可能出现的伤害;但是,种子大小对最终皮棉产量没有影响。
{"title":"Can cotton seed size mitigate preemergence herbicides injury?","authors":"Sarah K. Holladay,&nbsp;Michael W. Marshall,&nbsp;Michael T. Plumblee,&nbsp;Michael A. Jones,&nbsp;Sruthi Narayanan,&nbsp;Matthew D. Inman","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20286","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Preemergence herbicides (PRE) have become integral for weed control in cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.), especially with the prevalence of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Wats.). However, PRE herbicides have the potential to injure cotton seedlings. Previous research has shown that a larger seed size can compensate for early season stresses which could mitigate potential PRE herbicide injury. In this study, we evaluated growth and yield of two cotton varieties with different seed sizes (large and small) in response to three PRE herbicides alone and in combination. Percent visual injury, biomass, plant heights, stand counts, lint yield, and fiber quality were obtained to make comparisons between seed sizes and PRE treatments. In both years, the large-seeded variety had a higher biomass at 3-leaf stage. However, both varieties had “grown out” of the herbicide injury at 42 days after planting and the early season vigor of the larger seed did not result in higher lint yield. The small-seeded variety had greater yield in both years of the study. This may be due to the genetics or yield potential of the small-seeded variety, or bolls containing smaller seeds typically have a greater number of seeds with more opportunity for lint production. Cotton treated with diuron had the most visual injury and decreased biomass. The results from this study will allow growers to make more informed decisions with regards to seed size, vigor, and PRE herbicide choices. If crop injury is likely, a larger seeded cotton variety may mitigate potential early season injury; however, seed size did not have an impact on final lint yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20286","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141097941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Budget and breakeven prices of winter canola and pennycress production in Tennessee 田纳西州冬季油菜籽和菥蓂生产的预算和盈亏平衡价格
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20283
S. B. Keadle, V. R. Sykes, C. E. Sams, X. Yin, J. A. Larson, J. F. Grant

Canola (Brassica napus) and pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.) are winter oilseed crops that can be used to create sustainable aviation fuel. They have been grown successfully in the Upper Midwest and Great Plains and are garnering interest in the Mid-South. A field study was conducted in Tennessee to determine management practices and average yields expected for the region. From this study, a budget and breakeven analysis was conducted. Budgets were created for tilled and no-till canola and pennycress systems. Based on average yields obtained and projected oilseeds prices, canola systems are potentially profitable, while pennycress systems are not. However, breakeven prices were highly variable between years, locations, oilseed species, and tillage type. Canola has been relatively established in the region and can be promoted to growers as a profitable crop. Presently, the adoption of pennycress in the Mid-South is not recommended without further research on best management practices, breeding efforts for higher yielding varieties, and the creation of a viable market for sale.

油菜籽(Brassica napus)和菥蓂(Thlaspi arvense L.)是冬季油籽作物,可用于生产可持续航空燃料。它们已在上中西部和大平原成功种植,并在中南部引起了兴趣。田纳西州开展了一项实地研究,以确定该地区的管理方法和预期平均产量。根据这项研究,进行了预算和盈亏平衡分析。为翻耕和免耕油菜籽和菥蓂系统制定了预算。根据获得的平均产量和预计的油菜籽价格,油菜籽系统有可能盈利,而菥蓂系统则无利可图。然而,不同年份、不同地点、不同油籽品种和不同耕作类型之间的盈亏平衡价格差异很大。油菜籽在该地区已经相对成熟,可以作为一种有利可图的作物向种植者推广。目前,如果不进一步研究最佳管理方法、培育高产品种并建立可行的销售市场,不建议在中南部地区采用菥蓂。
{"title":"Budget and breakeven prices of winter canola and pennycress production in Tennessee","authors":"S. B. Keadle,&nbsp;V. R. Sykes,&nbsp;C. E. Sams,&nbsp;X. Yin,&nbsp;J. A. Larson,&nbsp;J. F. Grant","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20283","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Canola (<i>Brassica napus</i>) and pennycress (<i>Thlaspi arvense</i> L.) are winter oilseed crops that can be used to create sustainable aviation fuel. They have been grown successfully in the Upper Midwest and Great Plains and are garnering interest in the Mid-South. A field study was conducted in Tennessee to determine management practices and average yields expected for the region. From this study, a budget and breakeven analysis was conducted. Budgets were created for tilled and no-till canola and pennycress systems. Based on average yields obtained and projected oilseeds prices, canola systems are potentially profitable, while pennycress systems are not. However, breakeven prices were highly variable between years, locations, oilseed species, and tillage type. Canola has been relatively established in the region and can be promoted to growers as a profitable crop. Presently, the adoption of pennycress in the Mid-South is not recommended without further research on best management practices, breeding efforts for higher yielding varieties, and the creation of a viable market for sale.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20283","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140949195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agronomic and economic productivity of summer annual forage systems under different poultry litter application methods 不同家禽粪便施用方法下夏季一年生牧草系统的农艺和经济生产力
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20281
IvaNelle Meyer, Michael P. Popp, Christin C. Nieman, Amanda J. Ashworth, Phillip R. Owens

Poultry litter (litter) is a nutrient dense fertilizer that increases nutritive value and yield in pastures in the mid-southern US. Nutrient losses due to runoff and nitrogen volatilization are common when broadcasting litter. As such, incorporating litter below the soil surface (subsurface) was evaluated in comparison to broadcasting in 2021 and 2022 by quantifying yield and nutritive value of annual forages. The study was a randomized complete block design with three forage treatments—sorghum-sudangrass only (Sorghum bicolor L.), cowpea only (Vigna unguiculata L.), and their mixture, and three litter application methods (broadcast, subsurface, and a no litter control). Litter was applied in 2021 only as biennial application is common to save on application cost. Nutritive analyses included neutral detergent fiber and crude protein (CP). Partial budgeting led to relative profitability estimates by accounting for yield and cost differences across treatments. In comparison to the second-highest yielding forage mixture, sorghum-sudangrass yielded 4.5%–18.4% more regardless of litter application method. The forage mixture did not improve forage nutritive value, as cowpea were vastly outcompeted and did not average more than 5% of the total forage harvested in mixtures. Cowpea yields did not benefit from litter application. Subsurface application resulted in 8%–10% greater CP content compared to no litter and broadcast litter, respectively, across all forage species. Sorghum-sudangrass with subsurface applied litter earned nearly $70/acre more than sorghum-sudangrass with broadcast litter, the next highest treatment combination, and, with lesser nutrient loss.

家禽粪便(粪便)是一种营养丰富的肥料,可提高美国中南部牧场的营养价值和产量。播撒禽粪时,由于径流和氮挥发造成的养分损失很常见。因此,在 2021 年和 2022 年,通过量化一年生牧草的产量和营养价值,评估了在土壤表层下(地下)施用垃圾与播撒垃圾的比较。该研究采用随机完全区组设计,有三种牧草处理--仅高粱-苏丹草(Sorghum bicolor L.)、仅豇豆(Vigna unguiculata L.)和它们的混合物,以及三种垃圾施用方法(播撒、地下和无垃圾对照)。为节省施肥成本,通常每两年施肥一次,因此仅在 2021 年施肥一次。营养分析包括中性洗涤纤维和粗蛋白(CP)。通过计算不同处理的产量和成本差异,部分预算得出了相对收益率估算。与产量第二高的牧草混合物相比,高粱-苏丹草的产量高出 4.5%-18.4%,而不管采用哪种施肥方法。混合牧草并没有提高牧草的营养价值,因为豇豆的产量远远低于混合牧草,平均占总收获量的比例不超过 5%。豇豆的产量并没有从施用垃圾中受益。在所有牧草品种中,地表下施用与不施用秸秆垃圾和播撒秸秆垃圾相比,CP 含量分别高出 8%-10%。高粱-苏丹草每英亩的收益比高粱-苏丹草每英亩的收益高出近 70 美元,而高粱-苏丹草每英亩的收益仅次于高粱-苏丹草每英亩的收益。
{"title":"Agronomic and economic productivity of summer annual forage systems under different poultry litter application methods","authors":"IvaNelle Meyer,&nbsp;Michael P. Popp,&nbsp;Christin C. Nieman,&nbsp;Amanda J. Ashworth,&nbsp;Phillip R. Owens","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20281","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Poultry litter (litter) is a nutrient dense fertilizer that increases nutritive value and yield in pastures in the mid-southern US. Nutrient losses due to runoff and nitrogen volatilization are common when broadcasting litter. As such, incorporating litter below the soil surface (subsurface) was evaluated in comparison to broadcasting in 2021 and 2022 by quantifying yield and nutritive value of annual forages. The study was a randomized complete block design with three forage treatments—sorghum-sudangrass only (<i>Sorghum bicolor</i> L.), cowpea only (<i>Vigna unguiculata</i> L.), and their mixture, and three litter application methods (broadcast, subsurface, and a no litter control). Litter was applied in 2021 only as biennial application is common to save on application cost. Nutritive analyses included neutral detergent fiber and crude protein (CP). Partial budgeting led to relative profitability estimates by accounting for yield and cost differences across treatments. In comparison to the second-highest yielding forage mixture, sorghum-sudangrass yielded 4.5%–18.4% more regardless of litter application method. The forage mixture did not improve forage nutritive value, as cowpea were vastly outcompeted and did not average more than 5% of the total forage harvested in mixtures. Cowpea yields did not benefit from litter application. Subsurface application resulted in 8%–10% greater CP content compared to no litter and broadcast litter, respectively, across all forage species. Sorghum-sudangrass with subsurface applied litter earned nearly $70/acre more than sorghum-sudangrass with broadcast litter, the next highest treatment combination, and, with lesser nutrient loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20281","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140924813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A survey of ethofumesate resistant annual bluegrass (Poa annua) on US golf courses 美国高尔夫球场抗乙草胺年度蓝草(Poa annua)调查
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20282
Vera Vukovic, Clint M. Mattox, Alec R. Kowalewski, Brandon C. McNally, J. Scott McElroy, Aaron J. Patton

Annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) is the most troublesome weed on golf courses in the US. Many agronomic practices intended to promote high-quality playing surfaces favor the growth and development of annual bluegrass, resulting in high weed pressure. One commonly used herbicide for annual bluegrass control on golf courses is ethofumesate, which is a very long chain fatty acid inhibitor. Annual bluegrass resistance to this herbicide is documented and confirmed in grass seed production systems, but potential resistance on golf courses was previously unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and magnitude of potential ethofumesate resistance from a sample of US golf courses. A dose-response experiment was initiated at Purdue University using 30 annual bluegrass populations collected from Alabama, California, Indiana, and Oregon golf courses. Ten ethofumesate doses included 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, and 40.0 lb a.i. acre−1, with 1.0 to 2.0 a.i. acre−1 as the standard label application rate for perennial ryegrass turf. A low level of resistance (R/S < 3) was found in several populations collected in each state. The mean effective dose necessary to kill 50% of the populations (ED50) was 5.1, 9.2, 3.5, and 3.4 lb a.i. acre−1 for populations from Alabama, California, Indiana, and Oregon, respectively. The most resistant population originated from California, with an ED50 of 13.2 lb a.i. acre−1. To reduce selection pressure from ethofumesate populations, golf course superintendents are encouraged to develop site-specific weed control programs that rotate herbicide sites of action, as well as utilize diverse control tactics.

一年生蓝草(Poa annua L.)是美国高尔夫球场上最棘手的杂草。许多旨在提高比赛场地质量的农艺措施都有利于一年生蓝草的生长和发展,导致杂草压力很大。一种常用于控制高尔夫球场一年生蓝草的除草剂是乙草胺,它是一种超长链脂肪酸抑制剂。一年生蓝草对这种除草剂的抗药性已在草种生产系统中得到记录和证实,但在高尔夫球场上的潜在抗药性以前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是从美国高尔夫球场的样本中确定乙草胺潜在抗性的频率和程度。普渡大学利用从阿拉巴马州、加利福尼亚州、印第安纳州和俄勒冈州高尔夫球场采集的 30 个一年生蓝草种群,启动了一项剂量反应实验。十种乙草胺剂量包括 0、0.5、1.0、2.5、5.0、7.5、10.0、15.0、20.0 和 40.0 磅活性成分/英亩-1,其中 1.0 至 2.0 磅活性成分/英亩-1 是多年生黑麦草草坪的标准标签施用量。在各州采集的几个种群中发现了低水平的抗药性(R/S < 3)。亚拉巴马州、加利福尼亚州、印第安纳州和俄勒冈州的种群杀死 50% 种群所需的平均有效剂量(ED50)分别为 5.1、9.2、3.5 和 3.4 磅活性成分/英亩-1。抗性最强的种群来自加利福尼亚,ED50 为 13.2 磅活性成分-英亩-1。为减少乙草胺种群的选择压力,鼓励高尔夫球场管理者制定针对具体地点的杂草控制方案,轮换除草剂的作用点,并采用多种控制策略。
{"title":"A survey of ethofumesate resistant annual bluegrass (Poa annua) on US golf courses","authors":"Vera Vukovic,&nbsp;Clint M. Mattox,&nbsp;Alec R. Kowalewski,&nbsp;Brandon C. McNally,&nbsp;J. Scott McElroy,&nbsp;Aaron J. Patton","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20282","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Annual bluegrass (<i>Poa annua</i> L.) is the most troublesome weed on golf courses in the US. Many agronomic practices intended to promote high-quality playing surfaces favor the growth and development of annual bluegrass, resulting in high weed pressure. One commonly used herbicide for annual bluegrass control on golf courses is ethofumesate, which is a very long chain fatty acid inhibitor. Annual bluegrass resistance to this herbicide is documented and confirmed in grass seed production systems, but potential resistance on golf courses was previously unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and magnitude of potential ethofumesate resistance from a sample of US golf courses. A dose-response experiment was initiated at Purdue University using 30 annual bluegrass populations collected from Alabama, California, Indiana, and Oregon golf courses. Ten ethofumesate doses included 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, and 40.0 lb a.i. acre<sup>−1</sup>, with 1.0 to 2.0 a.i. acre<sup>−1</sup> as the standard label application rate for perennial ryegrass turf. A low level of resistance (R/S &lt; 3) was found in several populations collected in each state. The mean effective dose necessary to kill 50% of the populations (ED<sub>50</sub>) was 5.1, 9.2, 3.5, and 3.4 lb a.i. acre<sup>−1</sup> for populations from Alabama, California, Indiana, and Oregon, respectively. The most resistant population originated from California, with an ED<sub>50</sub> of 13.2<sub> </sub>lb a.i. acre<sup>−1</sup>. To reduce selection pressure from ethofumesate populations, golf course superintendents are encouraged to develop site-specific weed control programs that rotate herbicide sites of action, as well as utilize diverse control tactics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20282","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140924816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do roll timing and seeding rate affect lentil yields? 滚动时间和播种率如何影响扁豆产量?
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20278
Maryse Bourgault, Perry R. Miller, Simon Fordyce, Peggy F. Lamb, Jeff Holmes, Samuel T. Koeshall, Patrick M. Carr

Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) production has increased exponentially in Montana in the last two decades. However, there are important gaps in knowledge on best management practices for lentil. Agronomic recommendations are based on performance of old cultivars outside of the area for seeding rate, and on anecdotal evidence for proper roll timing, particularly since the widespread adoption of no-till farming. Replicated field experiments were conducted at three sites during the 2019, 2020, and 2021 growing seasons in Montana to determine the impacts of roll timing and seeding rate on lentil yield and identify best practices. Overall, rolling at emergence and at the 10-leaf stage decreased yields by 5% and 8%, respectively, but rolling just after planting or at the early vegetative stage (two- to four-leaf stage) did not decrease yields. Higher yields were achieved at higher seeding rates, with yields increasing between 6 and 52 lb ac−1 for each additional plant established per square foot, but emergence rates were variable and relatively low, so a higher seeding rate may be necessary to achieve plant densities above 12 plants ft−2 in this region. In five out of nine site years, the largest partial economic returns were achieved with 22.5 or 30 live seeds ft−2 seeding rate, corresponding to achieved plant densities of 12 to 16 plants ft−2. It was generally economical to increase seeding rate from 15 to 22.5 live seeds ft−2, thus increasing average achieved plant density from 8 to 13 plants ft−2, except when seed costs were high (>$0.45 lb−1) combined with low market prices (< $0.20 lb−1).

过去二十年间,蒙大拿州的扁豆(Lens culinaris Medik.)产量成倍增长。然而,有关扁豆最佳管理方法的知识还存在很大差距。农艺建议的依据是该地区以外的老栽培品种在播种率方面的表现,以及关于适当播种时间的传闻,特别是在广泛采用免耕耕作之后。2019、2020 和 2021 年生长季期间,在蒙大拿州的三个地点进行了重复田间试验,以确定滚种时间和播种率对扁豆产量的影响,并确定最佳做法。总体而言,在出苗期和 10 叶期翻压小扁豆,产量分别减少了 5%和 8%,但在播种后或早期植株期(2 至 4 叶期)翻压小扁豆并未减少产量。播种率越高,产量越高,每平方英尺每多种植一株,产量就会增加 6 到 52 磅英亩-1,但出苗率不稳定,而且相对较低,因此在该地区要使植物密度超过 12 株英尺-2,可能需要更高的播种率。在九个种植年中,有五个年份的部分经济收益最大,播种率为 22.5 或 30 活种子英尺-2,植物密度为 12 至 16 株英尺-2。一般来说,将播种率从 15 活种子英尺-2 提高到 22.5 活种子英尺-2,从而将平均植株密度从 8 株英尺-2 提高到 13 株英尺-2 是经济的,除非种子成本高(>0.45 美元磅-1)而市场价格低(< 0.20 美元磅-1)。
{"title":"How do roll timing and seeding rate affect lentil yields?","authors":"Maryse Bourgault,&nbsp;Perry R. Miller,&nbsp;Simon Fordyce,&nbsp;Peggy F. Lamb,&nbsp;Jeff Holmes,&nbsp;Samuel T. Koeshall,&nbsp;Patrick M. Carr","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20278","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lentil (<i>Lens culinaris</i> Medik.) production has increased exponentially in Montana in the last two decades. However, there are important gaps in knowledge on best management practices for lentil. Agronomic recommendations are based on performance of old cultivars outside of the area for seeding rate, and on anecdotal evidence for proper roll timing, particularly since the widespread adoption of no-till farming. Replicated field experiments were conducted at three sites during the 2019, 2020, and 2021 growing seasons in Montana to determine the impacts of roll timing and seeding rate on lentil yield and identify best practices. Overall, rolling at emergence and at the 10-leaf stage decreased yields by 5% and 8%, respectively, but rolling just after planting or at the early vegetative stage (two- to four-leaf stage) did not decrease yields. Higher yields were achieved at higher seeding rates, with yields increasing between 6 and 52 lb ac<sup>−1</sup> for each additional plant established per square foot, but emergence rates were variable and relatively low, so a higher seeding rate may be necessary to achieve plant densities above 12 plants ft<sup>−2</sup> in this region. In five out of nine site years, the largest partial economic returns were achieved with 22.5 or 30 live seeds ft<sup>−2</sup> seeding rate, corresponding to achieved plant densities of 12 to 16 plants ft<sup>−2</sup>. It was generally economical to increase seeding rate from 15 to 22.5 live seeds ft<sup>−2</sup>, thus increasing average achieved plant density from 8 to 13 plants ft<sup>−2</sup>, except when seed costs were high (&gt;$0.45 lb<sup>−1</sup>) combined with low market prices (&lt; $0.20 lb<sup>−1</sup>).</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20278","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140345569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vegetation and animal production in pastures sprayed for western ragweed control 喷洒西部豚草控制剂的牧场中的植被和动物产量
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20279
Keith Harmoney, John Jaeger, Jacob Hadle

Western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya DC) is one of the most common perennial, native forbs of western US rangelands. Cattle consume small quantities of western ragweed in their diets when present in the forage sward, and forage nutritive value tends to be greater than the associated grass component in those swards. Yet, many producers view western ragweed as an undesirable forb in rangelands. We conducted a study over two years to compare vegetative and stocker animal productivity in pastures that were either sprayed with dicamba at 6 oz/acre (0.19 lb a.i./acre) for western ragweed control or were left unsprayed. Pastures started the study with high western ragweed densities (>9 western ragweed plants/ft2) before pasture treatment, and spraying with dicamba significantly reduced western ragweed density and yield compared to unsprayed pastures (0.2 vs. 3.5 ragweed plants/ft2, and 0 vs. 206 lb/acre, respectively). Grass production and total vegetation production were similar between treatments. Crude protein and total digestible nutrients of western ragweed was greater than grass at all mid-season and end of season sampling dates both years. Stocker animal gain was not different between pastures sprayed for ragweed control and pastures left unsprayed in either year, nor when averaged over the two years (189 vs. 188 lb/head, sprayed vs. unsprayed, respectively). Beef production per acre was also similar. The spray treatment was an added expense that did not result in greater total forage, grass, or animal production. With natural fluctuations in western ragweed population densities due to weather patterns, producers will likely experience little benefit from spraying for western ragweed alone in pasture.

西部豚草(Ambrosia psilostachya DC)是美国西部牧场最常见的多年生原生草本植物之一。当西部豚草出现在牧草中时,牛会在其食物中摄入少量西部豚草,在这些牧草中,牧草的营养价值往往高于相关的禾本科成分。然而,许多生产者认为西部豚草是牧场中不受欢迎的禁草。我们进行了一项为期两年的研究,比较了喷洒 6 盎司/英亩(0.19 磅活性成分/英亩)麦草畏控制西部豚草或不喷洒麦草畏的牧场的植被和牲畜生产力。与未喷洒麦草畏的牧场相比,喷洒麦草畏能显著降低西部豚草的密度和产量(分别为 0.2 株/平方英尺和 3.5 株/平方英尺,以及 0 磅/英亩和 206 磅/英亩)。不同处理的牧草产量和植被总产量相似。在这两年的所有季中和季末取样日期,西部豚草的粗蛋白和可消化总养分都高于牧草。喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场和未喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场在任何一年的牲畜增重都没有差别,两年的平均值也没有差别(喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场和未喷洒豚草控制剂的牧场的牲畜增重分别为 189 磅/头和 188 磅/头)。每英亩的牛肉产量也相差无几。喷洒处理是一项额外开支,并没有提高饲料、草料或牲畜的总产量。由于天气模式导致西部豚草种群密度的自然波动,生产者可能不会从仅在牧场喷洒西部豚草中获益。
{"title":"Vegetation and animal production in pastures sprayed for western ragweed control","authors":"Keith Harmoney,&nbsp;John Jaeger,&nbsp;Jacob Hadle","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Western ragweed (<i>Ambrosia psilostachya</i> DC) is one of the most common perennial, native forbs of western US rangelands. Cattle consume small quantities of western ragweed in their diets when present in the forage sward, and forage nutritive value tends to be greater than the associated grass component in those swards. Yet, many producers view western ragweed as an undesirable forb in rangelands. We conducted a study over two years to compare vegetative and stocker animal productivity in pastures that were either sprayed with dicamba at 6 oz/acre (0.19 lb a.i./acre) for western ragweed control or were left unsprayed. Pastures started the study with high western ragweed densities (&gt;9 western ragweed plants/ft<sup>2</sup>) before pasture treatment, and spraying with dicamba significantly reduced western ragweed density and yield compared to unsprayed pastures (0.2 vs. 3.5 ragweed plants/ft<sup>2</sup>, and 0 vs. 206 lb/acre, respectively). Grass production and total vegetation production were similar between treatments. Crude protein and total digestible nutrients of western ragweed was greater than grass at all mid-season and end of season sampling dates both years. Stocker animal gain was not different between pastures sprayed for ragweed control and pastures left unsprayed in either year, nor when averaged over the two years (189 vs. 188 lb/head, sprayed vs. unsprayed, respectively). Beef production per acre was also similar. The spray treatment was an added expense that did not result in greater total forage, grass, or animal production. With natural fluctuations in western ragweed population densities due to weather patterns, producers will likely experience little benefit from spraying for western ragweed alone in pasture.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management Annual Report: 2023 作物、饲料和草坪管理年度报告:2023
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20275
{"title":"Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management Annual Report: 2023","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20275","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crop management recommendations: Agroptimizer decision support tool vs. local experts 作物管理建议:Agroptimizer 决策支持工具与当地专家的比较
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20277
Spyridon Mourtzinis, Shawn P. Conley

Farmers are making decisions every year under weather variability, input cost fluctuations, and commodity price uncertainty. Traditional replicated field trials cannot recommend actionable knowledge at the field level accounting for all sources of variability and uncertainty. Decision support tools aim to fill the gap that traditional agricultural research cannot. Agroptimizer (www.agroptimizer.com), a machine learning cloud-based decision support tool (DST) has a user-friendly interface that users can easily input field and management information and was designed to identify optimum corn and soybean cropping systems, for maximum yield and profit, across the United States. The recommended management practices of the DST were compared against cropping systems that were generated by University of Wisconsin researchers (called typical hereafter) across Wisconsin between 2021 and 2023. Agroptimizer recommendations for corn resulted in similar yield and profit compared to typical. For soybean, Agroptimizer recommendations resulted in increased yield and similar profit compared to typical. There was no downside yield and profit risk difference between Agroptimizer-based and typical cropping systems for both crops. Overall results showed that Agroptimizer successfully identified cropping systems that resulted in high yield and profit for both crops suggesting that in the absence of available expert recommendation, it can provide management practices with high yield and profit potential. Agroptimizer is being constantly updated and will be evaluated in additional locations across the United States in subsequent years.

农民每年都要在天气多变、投入成本波动和商品价格不确定的情况下做出决策。传统的重复田间试验无法在田间层面提供可操作的知识,无法考虑所有的变异性和不确定性来源。决策支持工具旨在弥补传统农业研究的不足。Agroptimizer(www.agroptimizer.com)是一款基于机器学习的云决策支持工具(DST),具有用户友好型界面,用户可以轻松输入田间和管理信息,其设计目的是在全美范围内确定最佳的玉米和大豆种植系统,以实现最高产量和利润。DST 推荐的管理方法与威斯康星大学研究人员在 2021 年至 2023 年期间在威斯康星州各地生成的种植系统(以下称为典型系统)进行了比较。Agroptimizer 推荐的玉米产量和利润与典型值相近。对于大豆,Agroptimizer 建议的产量和利润与典型值相近。基于 Agroptimizer 的种植系统与典型种植系统相比,两种作物的产量和利润风险都没有下降。总体结果表明,Agroptimizer 成功确定了两种作物的高产和高利润种植系统,这表明在没有专家建议的情况下,Agroptimizer 可以提供具有高产和高利润潜力的管理方法。Agroptimizer 正在不断更新,随后几年将在美国其他地方进行评估。
{"title":"Crop management recommendations: Agroptimizer decision support tool vs. local experts","authors":"Spyridon Mourtzinis,&nbsp;Shawn P. Conley","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20277","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farmers are making decisions every year under weather variability, input cost fluctuations, and commodity price uncertainty. Traditional replicated field trials cannot recommend actionable knowledge at the field level accounting for all sources of variability and uncertainty. Decision support tools aim to fill the gap that traditional agricultural research cannot. Agroptimizer (www.agroptimizer.com), a machine learning cloud-based decision support tool (DST) has a user-friendly interface that users can easily input field and management information and was designed to identify optimum corn and soybean cropping systems, for maximum yield and profit, across the United States. The recommended management practices of the DST were compared against cropping systems that were generated by University of Wisconsin researchers (called typical hereafter) across Wisconsin between 2021 and 2023. Agroptimizer recommendations for corn resulted in similar yield and profit compared to typical. For soybean, Agroptimizer recommendations resulted in increased yield and similar profit compared to typical. There was no downside yield and profit risk difference between Agroptimizer-based and typical cropping systems for both crops. Overall results showed that Agroptimizer successfully identified cropping systems that resulted in high yield and profit for both crops suggesting that in the absence of available expert recommendation, it can provide management practices with high yield and profit potential. Agroptimizer is being constantly updated and will be evaluated in additional locations across the United States in subsequent years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20277","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Weed control and rice response to microencapsulated acetochlor and a fenclorim seed treatment on a clay soil 粘土上的除草效果以及水稻对微胶囊乙草胺和芬克林种子处理剂的反应
IF 0.6 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.20274
Tristen H. Avent, Jason K. Norsworthy

Recent research has demonstrated the ability of a fenclorim seed treatment to reduce rice (Oryza sativa L.) injury to acetochlor. However, all studies were conducted on silt loam soils and have not evaluated rice tolerance or weed control on clay soils. Experiments were initiated in 2021 and 2022 at the Northeast Research and Extension Center near Keiser, AR, to determine rice response and the effectiveness of delayed-preemergence (DPRE)-applied microencapsulated (ME) acetochlor (1.1, 1.7, and 2.3 lb ai acre−1) when applied to a clay soil with and without a fenclorim seed treatment at 0 or 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb−1 of seed. Averaged over the fenclorim seed treatment, acetochlor at 1.1 and 1.7 lb ai acre−1 caused similar injury levels to rice; however, barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.] control increased at 1.7 lb ai acre−1, eliciting 19% injury to rice and 82% barnyardgrass control at 28 days after emergence (DAE). Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) control ranged from 82% to 93%. Additionally, fenclorim did not influence barnyardgrass or Palmer amaranth control, but it did reduce rice injury and increase shoot density, plant height, and rough rice grain yield. At 14 and 28 DAE, fenclorim at 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb−1 of seed (averaged over acetochlor rates) reduced visible rice injury from 61% to 13% and 40% to 8%, respectively. Results from this study indicate ME acetochlor could be successfully applied to rice grown on a clay soil when a fenclorim seed treatment is used, providing producers a new site of action for use in U.S. rice production.

最近的研究表明,芬克林种子处理剂能够减轻水稻(Oryza sativa L.)对乙草胺的伤害。不过,所有研究都是在淤泥质壤土上进行的,并未评估粘土上水稻的耐受性或杂草控制能力。2021 年和 2022 年,在美国阿肯色州凯泽附近的东北研究与推广中心启动了一项实验,以确定水稻对延迟萌发(DPRE)微胶囊化(ME)乙草胺(1.1、1.7 和 2.3 磅 ai acre-1)的反应,以及在粘土上施用或不施用芬克林种子处理(0 或 2.5 磅 ai 1000-lb-1 种子)时的效果。在芬克林种子处理的平均值上,1.1 和 1.7 lb ai acre-1 的乙草胺对水稻造成的伤害程度相似;然而,1.7 lb ai acre-1 的稗草[Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.]控制率增加,在出苗后 28 天(DAE),对水稻的伤害率为 19%,对稗草的控制率为 82%。帕尔默苋(Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson)的防治效果在 82% 到 93% 之间。此外,芬克林对稗草或帕尔默苋的控制没有影响,但它确实减少了水稻的伤害,增加了芽的密度、株高和糙米产量。在 14 和 28 DAE 期,使用 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb-1 种子的芬克林(乙草胺施用量的平均值)可分别将水稻可见伤害从 61% 降至 13%,从 40% 降至 8%。这项研究的结果表明,当使用芬克林种子处理剂时,炔草酯可以成功地应用于粘土上种植的水稻,为生产者提供了在美国水稻生产中使用的新作用点。
{"title":"Weed control and rice response to microencapsulated acetochlor and a fenclorim seed treatment on a clay soil","authors":"Tristen H. Avent,&nbsp;Jason K. Norsworthy","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20274","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent research has demonstrated the ability of a fenclorim seed treatment to reduce rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) injury to acetochlor. However, all studies were conducted on silt loam soils and have not evaluated rice tolerance or weed control on clay soils. Experiments were initiated in 2021 and 2022 at the Northeast Research and Extension Center near Keiser, AR, to determine rice response and the effectiveness of delayed-preemergence (DPRE)-applied microencapsulated (ME) acetochlor (1.1, 1.7, and 2.3 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) when applied to a clay soil with and without a fenclorim seed treatment at 0 or 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb<sup>−1</sup> of seed. Averaged over the fenclorim seed treatment, acetochlor at 1.1 and 1.7 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup> caused similar injury levels to rice; however, barnyardgrass [<i>Echinochloa crus-galli</i> (L.) P. Beauv.] control increased at 1.7 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>, eliciting 19% injury to rice and 82% barnyardgrass control at 28 days after emergence (DAE). Palmer amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Watson) control ranged from 82% to 93%. Additionally, fenclorim did not influence barnyardgrass or Palmer amaranth control, but it did reduce rice injury and increase shoot density, plant height, and rough rice grain yield. At 14 and 28 DAE, fenclorim at 2.5 lb ai 1000-lb<sup>−1</sup> of seed (averaged over acetochlor rates) reduced visible rice injury from 61% to 13% and 40% to 8%, respectively. Results from this study indicate ME acetochlor could be successfully applied to rice grown on a clay soil when a fenclorim seed treatment is used, providing producers a new site of action for use in U.S. rice production.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20274","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140342951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1