首页 > 最新文献

Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management最新文献

英文 中文
Microbial inoculants affect the chemical composition and fermentation of whole-plant corn silage 微生物接种剂对玉米全株青贮的化学成分和发酵产生影响
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70078
Chen Zhang, Tuo Yao, Fengqin Sha, Changning Li, Yang Lei, Shuangxiong Li, Yi Chao

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains on the quality of whole-plant corn (Zea mays L.) silage. Three LAB strains were selected from previous studies: Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP), Levilactobacillus brevis (LB), and Lentilactobacillus buchneri ssp. silagei (LS), along with their mixture (MX). Whole-plant corn was harvested, cut into 1- to 2-cm pieces, and ensiled either directly (control [CTRL]) or after treatment with LAB inoculants. LAB were applied at a final dose of 1 × 10⁶ colony-forming units g−1. Vacuum pouches were fermented for 3, 7, and 90 days, and the quality, microbial populations, and aerobic stability of the silage were measured. The interaction between inoculation and storage time significantly affected dry matter (DM), ether extract (EE), pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), lactic acid (LA), acetic acid, and propionic acid concentrations. MX reduced the DM loss and lowered neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber at 90 days but had no effect on crude protein and EE content. At 90 days, inoculation with MX decreased pH (0.21) and NH3-N (1.27) of silage with respect to CTRL (P < .05). Both MX and LB increased the content of water-soluble carbohydrates and LA (P < .05). Inoculation improved aerobic stability and increased the count of LAB (P < .05) while reducing the count of yeast, aerobic bacteria, and mold. Comprehensive evaluation revealed that inoculation with MX had the most favorable effect on the nutritional and fermentation quality of corn silage, reducing the growth of harmful microorganisms and delaying aerobic spoilage.

本试验旨在研究乳酸菌(LAB)菌株对全株玉米青贮品质的影响。从前期研究中筛选出3株乳酸菌:植物乳杆菌(Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LP)、短乳酸杆菌(Levilactobacillus brevis, LB)和布氏慢乳杆菌(Lentilactobacillus buchneri)。青稞(LS)及其混合物(MX)。收获整株玉米,切成1- 2厘米的块,直接青贮(对照[CTRL])或用乳酸菌接种剂处理后青贮。最终剂量为1 × 10 26菌落形成单位g−1。真空袋发酵3、7、90 d,测定青贮品质、微生物数量、好氧稳定性。接种与贮藏时间的交互作用显著影响了干物质(DM)、粗脂肪(EE)、pH、氨氮(NH3-N)、乳酸(LA)、乙酸和丙酸浓度。90 d时,MX降低了DM损失量,降低了中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维,但对粗蛋白质和粗脂肪含量没有影响。在第90天,与对照组相比,接种MX降低了青贮料pH(0.21)和NH3-N (1.27) (P < 0.05)。MX和LB均提高了水溶性碳水化合物和LA含量(P < 0.05)。接种提高了好氧稳定性,增加了LAB的数量(P < 0.05),同时减少了酵母、好氧细菌和霉菌的数量。综合评价表明,接种MX对玉米青贮营养和发酵品质的影响最为有利,可减少有害微生物的生长,延缓好氧变质。
{"title":"Microbial inoculants affect the chemical composition and fermentation of whole-plant corn silage","authors":"Chen Zhang,&nbsp;Tuo Yao,&nbsp;Fengqin Sha,&nbsp;Changning Li,&nbsp;Yang Lei,&nbsp;Shuangxiong Li,&nbsp;Yi Chao","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70078","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains on the quality of whole-plant corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) silage. Three LAB strains were selected from previous studies: <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> (LP), <i>Levilactobacillus brevis</i> (LB), and <i>Lentilactobacillus buchneri</i> ssp. <i>silagei</i> (LS), along with their mixture (MX). Whole-plant corn was harvested, cut into 1- to 2-cm pieces, and ensiled either directly (control [CTRL]) or after treatment with LAB inoculants. LAB were applied at a final dose of 1 × 10⁶ colony-forming units g<sup>−1</sup>. Vacuum pouches were fermented for 3, 7, and 90 days, and the quality, microbial populations, and aerobic stability of the silage were measured. The interaction between inoculation and storage time significantly affected dry matter (DM), ether extract (EE), pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N), lactic acid (LA), acetic acid, and propionic acid concentrations. MX reduced the DM loss and lowered neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber at 90 days but had no effect on crude protein and EE content. At 90 days, inoculation with MX decreased pH (0.21) and NH<sub>3</sub>-N (1.27) of silage with respect to CTRL (<i>P</i> &lt; .05). Both MX and LB increased the content of water-soluble carbohydrates and LA (<i>P</i> &lt; .05). Inoculation improved aerobic stability and increased the count of LAB (<i>P</i> &lt; .05) while reducing the count of yeast, aerobic bacteria, and mold. Comprehensive evaluation revealed that inoculation with MX had the most favorable effect on the nutritional and fermentation quality of corn silage, reducing the growth of harmful microorganisms and delaying aerobic spoilage.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145316999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seed quality through seed storage technologies under different locations in central Ethiopia 通过种子储存技术优化埃塞俄比亚中部不同地点鹰嘴豆种子品质
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70081
Abebe Sori, Zewdie Bishaw, Mashilla Dejene, Karta Kaske

A significant loss of seed quality may occur for planting under traditional on-farm chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seed storage techniques. We evaluated six alternative seed storage techniques over a 6-month period: (a) polypropylene bags (PPBs; traditionally used for on-farm seed storage), as the control; (b) filter cake (FC)–blended seed stored in PPBs (PPB+FC); (c) plastic drums (PDs); (d) FC-blended seed stored in PDs (PD+FC); (e) Super Grain Pro bags; and (f) Purdue Improved Crop Storage bags. The evaluation was conducted under ambient laboratory conditions at the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute and the Bishoftu Agricultural Research Center. Storage conditions, seed moisture content (SMC), seed germination (SG), seedling length, seedling dry weight, and seed vigor index I were measured every 2 months for 6 months. The results showed that the SMC of seed stored using alternative methods varied from 9.3% to 11.3%, whereas those in PPB had SMC ranging from 12.3% to 12.7% after 6 months of storage at the two locations. High SG was maintained by alternative storage techniques, ranging from 90.0% to 92.7% over 6 months at both locations. However, seed stored in the PPB for 6 months at the BARC had the lowest SG (78.7%). Hermetic bags maintained chickpea seed vigor throughout the storage period at both locations. In contrast, the non-hermetic storage technique resulted in a significant decline in seedling vigor over 6 months at both locations. This study found that hermetic seed storage technologies can preserve seed quality for 6 months, regardless of the storage location. Therefore, this study affirmed the need to promote effective alternative seed storage technologies to enhance chickpea productivity and farmers’ livelihoods.

在传统的农场鹰嘴豆种子储存技术下种植可能会导致种子质量的严重损失。我们在6个月的时间内评估了6种替代种子储存技术:(a)聚丙烯袋(PPBs,传统上用于农场种子储存)作为对照;(b)滤饼(FC) -混合种子存放在PPB中(PPB+FC);(c)塑料桶;(d)储存在PD中的FC混合种子(PD+FC);(e)超级谷物袋;(f)普渡改良作物贮藏袋。评估是在埃塞俄比亚生物多样性研究所和Bishoftu农业研究中心的环境实验室条件下进行的。贮藏条件、种子含水量(SMC)、种子发芽率(SG)、幼苗长、幼苗干重和种子活力指数(I)每2个月测定一次,连续测定6个月。结果表明,不同贮藏方式的种子贮藏6个月后,SMC在9.3% ~ 11.3%之间,而PPB贮藏方式的种子SMC在12.3% ~ 12.7%之间。在6个月的时间里,两个地点的高SG保持在90.0%至92.7%之间。而在BARC的PPB中储存6个月的种子SG最低(78.7%)。密封袋在两个地点的整个贮存期间保持了鹰嘴豆种子的活力。与此相反,非密闭贮藏技术在6个月内导致两个地点幼苗活力显著下降。本研究发现,无论储存地点如何,密封种子储存技术都能使种子品质保持6个月。因此,本研究肯定了推广有效的替代种子储存技术以提高鹰嘴豆产量和农民生计的必要性。
{"title":"Optimizing chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seed quality through seed storage technologies under different locations in central Ethiopia","authors":"Abebe Sori,&nbsp;Zewdie Bishaw,&nbsp;Mashilla Dejene,&nbsp;Karta Kaske","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70081","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A significant loss of seed quality may occur for planting under traditional on-farm chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i> L.) seed storage techniques. We evaluated six alternative seed storage techniques over a 6-month period: (a) polypropylene bags (PPBs; traditionally used for on-farm seed storage), as the control; (b) filter cake (FC)–blended seed stored in PPBs (PPB+FC); (c) plastic drums (PDs); (d) FC-blended seed stored in PDs (PD+FC); (e) Super Grain Pro bags; and (f) Purdue Improved Crop Storage bags. The evaluation was conducted under ambient laboratory conditions at the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute and the Bishoftu Agricultural Research Center. Storage conditions, seed moisture content (SMC), seed germination (SG), seedling length, seedling dry weight, and seed vigor index I were measured every 2 months for 6 months. The results showed that the SMC of seed stored using alternative methods varied from 9.3% to 11.3%, whereas those in PPB had SMC ranging from 12.3% to 12.7% after 6 months of storage at the two locations. High SG was maintained by alternative storage techniques, ranging from 90.0% to 92.7% over 6 months at both locations. However, seed stored in the PPB for 6 months at the BARC had the lowest SG (78.7%). Hermetic bags maintained chickpea seed vigor throughout the storage period at both locations. In contrast, the non-hermetic storage technique resulted in a significant decline in seedling vigor over 6 months at both locations. This study found that hermetic seed storage technologies can preserve seed quality for 6 months, regardless of the storage location. Therefore, this study affirmed the need to promote effective alternative seed storage technologies to enhance chickpea productivity and farmers’ livelihoods.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145316771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using variety testing data to select soybean varieties: Guidelines for practitioners 使用品种测试数据选择大豆品种:从业者指南
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70077
David Moseley, Andre Reis, Md. Rasel Parvej, Tristan Watson, Trey Price, Boyd Padgett, Noah DeWitt, Tri Setiyono, Manoch Kongchum, Eros Francisco, Maninder P. Singh, Rachel Vann, Emma Matcham, Giovani Preza Fontes, Carrie Ortel, Sara Thomas-Sharma, Michael J. Mulvaney, Jenny S. Carleo, Ryan Heiniger, Katarzyna Fic, Caio Vieira

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] variety selection is a crucial decision that impacts farm profitability. Effective variety selection requires performance evaluation across diverse environments to determine whether differences are due to genetic or nongenetic factors. Producers should use different types of multiple-location variety trials to select high-yielding varieties with resistance or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stressors prevalent in their region. In addition, information on other traits (e.g., plant height, lodging, green stem) that can be obtained should be considered when selecting a variety. Two different types of variety trials that are normally conducted by university extension programs and seed companies consist of replicated small-plot trials and on-farm large strip-plot demonstrations. The data from these trials are normally published in printed publications, downloadable online data sheets (e.g., PDFs, spreadsheets), and user-friendly online selection tools. The objectives of this management guide are to (a) describe replicated small-plot trials and unreplicated on-farm large strip-plot demonstrations, including attributes of each type; (b) demonstrate a data-driven approach to selecting high-yielding varieties with resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors; and (c) discuss additional agronomic and seed quality traits that aid in understanding the differences in varieties. Data and interpretation from multiple-location official variety trials and on-farm strip-plot demonstrations from the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center were used to demonstrate results commonly available from university extension programs. Evaluating yield and stress resistance data across multiple locations and years, including both replicated small-plot trials and on-farm strip-plot demonstrations, provides the most reliable basis for selecting varieties adapted to diverse and unpredictable environmental conditions.

大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。品种选择是影响农场盈利能力的关键决定。有效的品种选择需要在不同的环境中进行性能评估,以确定差异是由于遗传因素还是非遗传因素。生产者应采用不同类型的多地点品种试验,选择对其所在地区普遍存在的生物和非生物胁迫具有抗性或耐受性的高产品种。此外,在选择品种时应考虑可获得的其他性状信息(如株高、倒伏、茎绿)。两种不同类型的品种试验通常由大学推广项目和种子公司进行,包括重复的小块试验和农场上的大块示范。这些试验的数据通常发表在印刷出版物、可下载的在线数据表(例如,pdf、电子表格)和用户友好的在线选择工具中。本管理指南的目标是(a)描述重复的小地块试验和未重复的农场大型带状地块示范,包括每种类型的属性;(b)展示一种数据驱动的方法,以选择对生物和非生物压力源具有抗性的高产品种;(c)讨论有助于理解品种差异的其他农艺性状和种子质量性状。来自路易斯安那州立大学农业中心的多地点官方品种试验和农场带状地块示范的数据和解释用于展示大学推广项目中常见的结果。评估多个地点和年份的产量和抗逆性数据,包括重复的小块试验和农田带状示范,为选择适应多样化和不可预测环境条件的品种提供了最可靠的依据。
{"title":"Using variety testing data to select soybean varieties: Guidelines for practitioners","authors":"David Moseley,&nbsp;Andre Reis,&nbsp;Md. Rasel Parvej,&nbsp;Tristan Watson,&nbsp;Trey Price,&nbsp;Boyd Padgett,&nbsp;Noah DeWitt,&nbsp;Tri Setiyono,&nbsp;Manoch Kongchum,&nbsp;Eros Francisco,&nbsp;Maninder P. Singh,&nbsp;Rachel Vann,&nbsp;Emma Matcham,&nbsp;Giovani Preza Fontes,&nbsp;Carrie Ortel,&nbsp;Sara Thomas-Sharma,&nbsp;Michael J. Mulvaney,&nbsp;Jenny S. Carleo,&nbsp;Ryan Heiniger,&nbsp;Katarzyna Fic,&nbsp;Caio Vieira","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] variety selection is a crucial decision that impacts farm profitability. Effective variety selection requires performance evaluation across diverse environments to determine whether differences are due to genetic or nongenetic factors. Producers should use different types of multiple-location variety trials to select high-yielding varieties with resistance or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stressors prevalent in their region. In addition, information on other traits (e.g., plant height, lodging, green stem) that can be obtained should be considered when selecting a variety. Two different types of variety trials that are normally conducted by university extension programs and seed companies consist of replicated small-plot trials and on-farm large strip-plot demonstrations. The data from these trials are normally published in printed publications, downloadable online data sheets (e.g., PDFs, spreadsheets), and user-friendly online selection tools. The objectives of this management guide are to (a) describe replicated small-plot trials and unreplicated on-farm large strip-plot demonstrations, including attributes of each type; (b) demonstrate a data-driven approach to selecting high-yielding varieties with resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors; and (c) discuss additional agronomic and seed quality traits that aid in understanding the differences in varieties. Data and interpretation from multiple-location official variety trials and on-farm strip-plot demonstrations from the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center were used to demonstrate results commonly available from university extension programs. Evaluating yield and stress resistance data across multiple locations and years, including both replicated small-plot trials and on-farm strip-plot demonstrations, provides the most reliable basis for selecting varieties adapted to diverse and unpredictable environmental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70077","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145272649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishment strategies for native warm-season grasses: Organic and conventional approaches 本地暖季草的建立策略:有机和传统方法
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70075
Chelsie Y. Rodriguez-Hernandéz, Emanoella K. S. Otaviano, Daniel Borrenpohl, Ricardo H. Ribeiro, Alexandre F. Mammana, Christine Gelley, Chad Bitler, Marília B. Chiavegato

Native warm-season grasses (NWSG) adoption is limited partly due to establishment challenges, especially weed competition. The objective was to develop establishment protocols for switchgrass [Panicum virgatum (L.) ‘Vitman’; SG], eastern gamagrass [Tripsacum dactyloides (L.); EG] and a mix of Indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutans (L.) ‘Nash’; IG] and big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii ‘Vitman’; BB) under organic and conventional herbicide management across three sites in Ohio from 2021 to 2024. Three strategies were evaluated: (a) Conventional, no-till with herbicide; (b) Conventional + cereal rye cover crop (CC); and (c) Organic, with tillage and summer (sorghum –sudangrass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. drummondii (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet & Harlan} + cowpea [Vigna Savi]) and fall (oats [Avena L.]) cover crops. Organic treatments used no herbicide and Conventional treatments used glyphosate (SG, EG) or imazapic (IG/BB), with some sites receiving 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid). Results demonstrate that in Conventional treatments, with and without cover crops, NWSG growth suppressed weeds and forage mass was stabilized by Years 2 and 3. The Organic system consistently had the lowest forage and the greatest weed mass. For most locations/years, the greater NWSG mass and cover and lowest weed mass and cover occurred in the IG/BG mix compared with SG and EG, probably due to the selective herbicide use reducing weed pressure and promoting faster forage growth. Forage nutritive value was greater in the IG/BG mix. However, all NWSG species had moderate to good nutritive value, according to USDA hay standards, which do not specify animal category. In conclusion, successful NWSG establishment required chemical weed control, and adding cover crops with herbicide was less effective than herbicide alone.

本地暖季草(NWSG)的采用有限,部分原因是由于建立的挑战,特别是杂草的竞争。目的是制定柳枝稷[Panicum virgatum (L.)]的建立方案。“Vitman”;[SG],东部革草[三叶草(Tripsacum dactyloides)];和印度草[高粱]的混合物[L.]“纳什”;从2021年到2024年,在俄亥俄州的三个地点进行有机和传统除草剂管理的大蓝茎(Andropogon gerardii ' Vitman; BB)。评价了三种策略:(a)常规免耕除草剂;(b)常规+谷物黑麦覆盖作物;(c)有机,与耕作和夏季(高粱-苏丹草[高粱双色(L.)])Moench ssp。drummondii (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet &; Harlan} +豇豆[Vigna Savi])和燕麦[Avena L.])覆盖作物。有机处理不使用除草剂,常规处理使用草甘膦(SG, EG)或异氮吡嗪(IG/BB),一些位点使用2,4- d(2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸)。结果表明:在常规处理下,无论有无覆盖作物,NWSG生长抑制杂草和牧草量在第2年和第3年趋于稳定。有机系统牧草质量最低,杂草质量最大。在大多数地点/年份,与SG和EG相比,IG/BG组合的NWSG质量和覆盖度更高,杂草质量和覆盖度最低,这可能是由于选择性使用除草剂减少了杂草压力,促进了牧草生长。饲料营养价值在IG/BG组合中较高。然而,根据美国农业部的干草标准,所有NWSG品种都具有中等到良好的营养价值,该标准没有指定动物类别。综上所述,NWSG的成功建立需要化学杂草控制,覆盖作物添加除草剂的效果不如单独使用除草剂。
{"title":"Establishment strategies for native warm-season grasses: Organic and conventional approaches","authors":"Chelsie Y. Rodriguez-Hernandéz,&nbsp;Emanoella K. S. Otaviano,&nbsp;Daniel Borrenpohl,&nbsp;Ricardo H. Ribeiro,&nbsp;Alexandre F. Mammana,&nbsp;Christine Gelley,&nbsp;Chad Bitler,&nbsp;Marília B. Chiavegato","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Native warm-season grasses (NWSG) adoption is limited partly due to establishment challenges, especially weed competition. The objective was to develop establishment protocols for switchgrass [<i>Panicum virgatum</i> (L.) ‘Vitman’; SG], eastern gamagrass [<i>Tripsacum dactyloides</i> (L.); EG] and a mix of Indiangrass [<i>Sorghastrum nutans</i> (L.) ‘Nash’; IG] and big bluestem (<i>Andropogon gerardii</i> ‘Vitman’; BB) under organic and conventional herbicide management across three sites in Ohio from 2021 to 2024. Three strategies were evaluated: (a) Conventional, no-till with herbicide; (b) Conventional + cereal rye cover crop (CC); and (c) Organic, with tillage and summer (sorghum –sudangrass [<i>Sorghum bicolor</i> (L.) Moench ssp. <i>drummondii</i> (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet &amp; Harlan} + cowpea [<i>Vigna</i> Savi]) and fall (oats [<i>Avena</i> L.]) cover crops. Organic treatments used no herbicide and Conventional treatments used glyphosate (SG, EG) or imazapic (IG/BB), with some sites receiving 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid). Results demonstrate that in Conventional treatments, with and without cover crops, NWSG growth suppressed weeds and forage mass was stabilized by Years 2 and 3. The Organic system consistently had the lowest forage and the greatest weed mass. For most locations/years, the greater NWSG mass and cover and lowest weed mass and cover occurred in the IG/BG mix compared with SG and EG, probably due to the selective herbicide use reducing weed pressure and promoting faster forage growth. Forage nutritive value was greater in the IG/BG mix. However, all NWSG species had moderate to good nutritive value, according to USDA hay standards, which do not specify animal category. In conclusion, successful NWSG establishment required chemical weed control, and adding cover crops with herbicide was less effective than herbicide alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70075","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145272875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using ethephon for suppressing spring seedheads in interspecific zoysiagrass hybrid (‘DALZ 1701’) 乙烯利抑制结缕草种间杂交品种‘dalz1701’春穗
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70080
Jack D. Fry, Ross C. Braun
{"title":"Using ethephon for suppressing spring seedheads in interspecific zoysiagrass hybrid (‘DALZ 1701’)","authors":"Jack D. Fry,&nbsp;Ross C. Braun","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70080","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70080","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145135523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seasonal and diurnal variation in forage nutritive value of cool-season grasses as predicted by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) 近红外光谱(NIRS)预测冷季牧草营养价值的季节和日变化
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70079
AnnMarie C. Riley, Isabelle A. Kagan, Brittany E. Davis, Laurie M. Lawrence, Chris D. Teutsch, S. Ray Smith

A better understanding of seasonal and diurnal variation in forage nutritive value may help to maximize protein intake and digestibility for grazing livestock. Forage nutritive value was evaluated in four cool-season grasses common to Kentucky pastures: orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.; OG), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. ssp. perenne; PRG), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.; KBG), and tall fescue [Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.; TF]. In 2015 and 2017, 10 cool-season grass cultivars representing four species, planted in quadruplicate (40 plots) in central Kentucky, were maintained vegetatively with 2–4 week mowing and sampled in the morning and the afternoon at the same times every 2–4 weeks, from May to November. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) was used to predict dry matter (DM) and in vitro true dry matter digestibility (IVTDMD), as well as concentrations of acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and crude protein (CP). On most harvest dates, ADF and NDF were higher in the morning than in the afternoon, and highest in KBG and TF species. Concentrations of CP did not have a consistent diurnal pattern across harvest dates. On most harvest dates, IVTDMD increased in the afternoon and was highest in PRG. The results could inform grazing management for weight gain in beef cattle or weight loss in overweight horses.

更好地了解饲料营养价值的季节和日变化,有助于提高放牧牲畜的蛋白质摄入量和消化率。以肯塔基州牧草中常见的4种冷季牧草:果园草(Dactylis glomerata L.; OG)、多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne L. ssp)为研究材料,对其营养价值进行了评价。为;PRG),肯塔基蓝草(Poa pratensis L.; KBG)和高羊茅[scheonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.)]。Dumort。TF)。2015年和2017年,在肯塔基州中部种植了4个不同品种的10个寒季草品种,分4个重复(40个样地),每隔2-4周进行刈割,并于5 - 11月每隔2-4周的上午和下午同一时间取样。采用近红外反射光谱(NIRS)预测干物质(DM)和体外真干物质消化率(IVTDMD),以及酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和粗蛋白质(CP)的浓度。在大多数收获日期,ADF和NDF在上午高于下午,以KBG和TF种最高。CP的浓度在收获日期没有一致的日模式。在大多数收获日期,IVTDMD在下午增加,在PRG最高。研究结果可以为肉牛增重或超重马减重的放牧管理提供信息。
{"title":"Seasonal and diurnal variation in forage nutritive value of cool-season grasses as predicted by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)","authors":"AnnMarie C. Riley,&nbsp;Isabelle A. Kagan,&nbsp;Brittany E. Davis,&nbsp;Laurie M. Lawrence,&nbsp;Chris D. Teutsch,&nbsp;S. Ray Smith","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70079","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70079","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A better understanding of seasonal and diurnal variation in forage nutritive value may help to maximize protein intake and digestibility for grazing livestock. Forage nutritive value was evaluated in four cool-season grasses common to Kentucky pastures: orchardgrass (<i>Dactylis glomerata</i> L.; OG), perennial ryegrass (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L. ssp. <i>perenne</i>; PRG), Kentucky bluegrass (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L.; KBG), and tall fescue [<i>Schedonorus arundinaceus</i> (Schreb.) Dumort.; TF]. In 2015 and 2017, 10 cool-season grass cultivars representing four species, planted in quadruplicate (40 plots) in central Kentucky, were maintained vegetatively with 2–4 week mowing and sampled in the morning and the afternoon at the same times every 2–4 weeks, from May to November. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) was used to predict dry matter (DM) and in vitro true dry matter digestibility (IVTDMD), as well as concentrations of acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and crude protein (CP). On most harvest dates, ADF and NDF were higher in the morning than in the afternoon, and highest in KBG and TF species. Concentrations of CP did not have a consistent diurnal pattern across harvest dates. On most harvest dates, IVTDMD increased in the afternoon and was highest in PRG. The results could inform grazing management for weight gain in beef cattle or weight loss in overweight horses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70079","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145135524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forage, carbon accumulation, and soil physical characteristics in a crop–livestock production system 作物-牲畜生产系统中的饲料、碳积累和土壤物理特性
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-08-24 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70073
Mariana N. de Souza, Renata da Rosa Dornelles, Álvaro L. Mafra, Henrique M. N. Ribeiro-Filho

Crop-livestock systems may improve land use and food security; however, heavy grazing can impair the soil physical properties and reduce the forage accumulation of subsequent crops. The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of mechanically harvest or low-intensity grazing on the physical properties of soil and the productivity of an annual pasture, ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.), and its successive crop, maize (Zea mays L.). Pasture and maize were evaluated from 2017 to 2021 and 2021 to 2022, respectively. The ryegrass was either mechanically harvested for silage production or grazed when the pre-defoliation sward height was between 20 and 25 cm. The total forage accumulation increased (P < 0.08) by approximately 500 kg ha−1 and forage accumulation rate were 25% greater (P < 0.01) in grazed pastures than in non-grazed pastures. Different pasture defoliation methods did not affect the physical properties of the soil. The total organic carbon concentration tended to be greater (P = 0.058) in the grazed area than in the non-grazed area, and the maize forage accumulation (average = 14,611 kg ha−1) and chemical composition were similar for plants from the previously grazed and non-grazed areas. Four consecutive years of grazing did not impair the physical quality of the soil and DM production in either the pasture or maize silage. Thus, moderate grazing can be sustainably implemented over multiple years without degrading soil structure or reducing the productivity of forage and subsequent crops.

作物-牲畜系统可以改善土地利用和粮食安全;然而,重度放牧会损害土壤的物理性质,减少后续作物的饲料积累。本研究旨在评价机械收割或低强度放牧对一年生牧草黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum L.)及其连作作物玉米(Zea mays L.)土壤物理性质和生产力的影响。分别在2017 - 2021年和2021 - 2022年对牧草和玉米进行评价。机械采收黑麦草用于青贮,或在落叶前草高为20 ~ 25 cm时进行放牧。放牧比非放牧增加了约500 kg ha - 1 (P < 0.08),牧草积累率提高了25% (P < 0.01)。不同的草地落叶方式对土壤的物理性质没有影响。放牧区总有机碳浓度高于非放牧区(P = 0.058),前放牧区和非放牧区玉米饲料积累量(平均14611 kg ha−1)和化学成分相似。连续放牧4年对草地和青贮玉米土壤物理质量和干物质产量均无影响。因此,适度放牧可以持续实施多年,而不会使土壤结构退化或降低饲料和后续作物的生产力。
{"title":"Forage, carbon accumulation, and soil physical characteristics in a crop–livestock production system","authors":"Mariana N. de Souza,&nbsp;Renata da Rosa Dornelles,&nbsp;Álvaro L. Mafra,&nbsp;Henrique M. N. Ribeiro-Filho","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70073","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70073","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crop-livestock systems may improve land use and food security; however, heavy grazing can impair the soil physical properties and reduce the forage accumulation of subsequent crops. The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of mechanically harvest or low-intensity grazing on the physical properties of soil and the productivity of an annual pasture, ryegrass (<i>Lolium multiflorum</i> L.), and its successive crop, maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.). Pasture and maize were evaluated from 2017 to 2021 and 2021 to 2022, respectively. The ryegrass was either mechanically harvested for silage production or grazed when the pre-defoliation sward height was between 20 and 25 cm. The total forage accumulation increased (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.08) by approximately 500 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> and forage accumulation rate were 25% greater (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01) in grazed pastures than in non-grazed pastures. Different pasture defoliation methods did not affect the physical properties of the soil. The total organic carbon concentration tended to be greater (<i>P</i> = 0.058) in the grazed area than in the non-grazed area, and the maize forage accumulation (average = 14,611 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and chemical composition were similar for plants from the previously grazed and non-grazed areas. Four consecutive years of grazing did not impair the physical quality of the soil and DM production in either the pasture or maize silage. Thus, moderate grazing can be sustainably implemented over multiple years without degrading soil structure or reducing the productivity of forage and subsequent crops.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70073","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144894131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zoysiagrass sod production: A review 结缕草草皮生产综述
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70074
Ross C. Braun, Olayemi C. Ojeokun, Aaron J. Patton, Jack D. Fry, Ambika Chandra, Chase Martin

Zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp. Willd.) produces a high-quality warm-season turfgrass sward and requires fewer management inputs compared with many other warm-season turfgrass species. Three primary species, all known by the common name “zoysiagrass,” are used in the United States, and these include Z. japonica, Z. matrella, and Z. pacifica. These three zoysiagrasses are distinguished from one another based on stress tolerance differences, visual characteristics, and their geographic distribution. Together, all of these factors influence the breeding, production, and distribution of zoysiagrass sod in the US production, and distribution of each species is typically transitional, warm-humid, and warm-arid climatic zones (Z. japonica); warm-humid, and warm-arid climatic zones (Z. matrella); and warm-tropical climate zones (Z. pacifica). This review summarizes the knowledge of the current zoysiagrass sod market and research related to the establishment, management, weed control, and harvest and transplanting of zoysiagrass sod and identifies the knowledge gaps and future research needs. Compared with bermudagrass (Cynodon spp. Rich.), zoysiagrass research is lacking, especially related to sod production. Future research on zoysiagrass should focus on establishment, post-planting management, quantifying management inputs, and practices to hasten sod production times, and improve transplant success. Additionally, more research is needed on weed control during establishment and production. Because of its wide adaptation and genetic diversity, research should be conducted in multiple climates across a diversity of cultivars to aid sod producers and end-users.

结缕草(Zoysia spp. wild .)是一种高质量的暖季草坪草,与许多其他暖季草坪草品种相比,需要更少的管理投入。三种主要的物种,都以共同的名字“结缕草”而闻名,在美国被使用,其中包括Z. japonica, Z. matrella和Z. pacifica。这三种结缕草是根据它们的抗逆性差异、视觉特征和地理分布来区分的。综上所述,所有这些因素都影响着结丝草草皮在美国的繁殖、生产和分布,并且每个物种的分布都是典型的过渡、暖湿和暖干旱气候带(Z. japonica);暖湿和暖干气候带(Z. matrella);暖热带气候带(Z. pacifica)。本文综述了目前结缕草草皮市场的相关知识,以及结缕草草皮的建立、管理、杂草控制、收获和移栽等相关研究,并指出了知识空白和未来的研究需求。与百慕大草(Cynodon spp. Rich.)相比,结缕草的研究较少,特别是与草皮生产有关的研究较少。今后对结结草的研究应集中在建立、种后管理、量化管理投入和加快草皮生产时间、提高移栽成功率等方面。此外,还需要对建设和生产过程中的杂草控制进行更多的研究。由于其广泛的适应性和遗传多样性,应在多种气候条件下对多种品种进行研究,以帮助sod生产者和最终用户。
{"title":"Zoysiagrass sod production: A review","authors":"Ross C. Braun,&nbsp;Olayemi C. Ojeokun,&nbsp;Aaron J. Patton,&nbsp;Jack D. Fry,&nbsp;Ambika Chandra,&nbsp;Chase Martin","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70074","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70074","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zoysiagrass (<i>Zoysia</i> spp. Willd.) produces a high-quality warm-season turfgrass sward and requires fewer management inputs compared with many other warm-season turfgrass species. Three primary species, all known by the common name “zoysiagrass,” are used in the United States, and these include <i>Z</i>. <i>japonica</i>, <i>Z</i>. <i>matrella</i>, and <i>Z</i>. <i>pacifica</i>. These three zoysiagrasses are distinguished from one another based on stress tolerance differences, visual characteristics, and their geographic distribution. Together, all of these factors influence the breeding, production, and distribution of zoysiagrass sod in the US production, and distribution of each species is typically transitional, warm-humid, and warm-arid climatic zones (<i>Z</i>. <i>japonica</i>); warm-humid, and warm-arid climatic zones (<i>Z</i>. <i>matrella</i>); and warm-tropical climate zones (<i>Z</i>. <i>pacifica</i>). This review summarizes the knowledge of the current zoysiagrass sod market and research related to the establishment, management, weed control, and harvest and transplanting of zoysiagrass sod and identifies the knowledge gaps and future research needs. Compared with bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon</i> spp. Rich.), zoysiagrass research is lacking, especially related to sod production. Future research on zoysiagrass should focus on establishment, post-planting management, quantifying management inputs, and practices to hasten sod production times, and improve transplant success. Additionally, more research is needed on weed control during establishment and production. Because of its wide adaptation and genetic diversity, research should be conducted in multiple climates across a diversity of cultivars to aid sod producers and end-users.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144888220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nickel application influences nitrogen concentration, yield, and grain quality of soybean 施用镍影响大豆氮素浓度、产量和籽粒品质
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-08-15 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70068
Jorge Delfim, Adônis Moreira, Larissa A. C. Moraes

Nickel (Ni) is an essential element in nitrogen (N) metabolism. This study evaluated the effects of foliar fertilization with Ni on the grain yield (GY), yield components, N content, grain protein, and oil content of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. Two field experiments, each testing a different soybean cultivar, ‘BRS 284’ and ‘BRS 399RR’, were performed during the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 growing seasons, in Londrina, Brazil. The experimental design was randomized blocks with three treatments (0, 60, and 120 g Ni ha−1, using nickel chloride) and eight replications. Foliar application of Ni was performed by applying half of the rate at flowering and half during grain filling. The results showed that application of 60 and 120 g Ni increased the GY by 4.0% and 6.4% compared to the control in BRS 399RR in the first season. For BRS 284, no significant differences were observed in either season. N concentration in leaves improved by 7.1% and 7.8%, in the first and 18.5% and 14.0% in the second season under 60 and 120 g Ni rates, respectively, compared to control in BRS 284. For BRS 399RR, the leaf content of N increased 16.5% and 14.5% for both Ni rates compared to the control only in the first season. However, only in the second season, spraying 60 and 120 g Ni increased the N concentration in the grains by 7.9% and 22.4% for BRS 284 compared to the control. The effects of foliar Ni spray vary among soybean cultivars and dry periods, which influence N supply, use efficiency, and GY.

镍(Ni)是氮(N)代谢的必需元素。研究了叶片施镍对大豆籽粒产量、产量组成、氮素含量、籽粒蛋白质和油脂含量的影响。稳定)。在2019-2020年和2020-2021年两个生长季节,在巴西Londrina进行了两个大田试验,每个试验对不同的大豆品种BRS 284和BRS 399RR进行了测试。试验设计为随机分组,分为3个处理(0、60和120 g Ni ha - 1,使用氯化镍)和8个重复。叶面施用镍的方法为花期施用一半,灌浆期施用一半。结果表明:与对照相比,施用60和120 g Ni可使BRS 399RR第一季产量分别提高4.0%和6.4%;brs284在两个季节均无显著差异。在60 g和120 g Ni浓度处理下,brs284第1季和第2季叶片氮浓度分别比对照提高了7.1%和7.8%,第2季分别提高了18.5%和14.0%。BRS 399RR在两种Ni浓度下,仅第一季叶片氮含量较对照分别提高了16.5%和14.5%。然而,仅在第二季,喷施60和120 g Ni, BRS 284的籽粒氮浓度较对照分别提高了7.9%和22.4%。叶面喷施镍的效果因大豆品种和干旱期而异,影响氮素供应、利用效率和土壤肥力。
{"title":"Nickel application influences nitrogen concentration, yield, and grain quality of soybean","authors":"Jorge Delfim,&nbsp;Adônis Moreira,&nbsp;Larissa A. C. Moraes","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70068","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nickel (Ni) is an essential element in nitrogen (N) metabolism. This study evaluated the effects of foliar fertilization with Ni on the grain yield (GY), yield components, N content, grain protein, and oil content of soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr]. Two field experiments, each testing a different soybean cultivar, ‘BRS 284’ and ‘BRS 399RR’, were performed during the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 growing seasons, in Londrina, Brazil. The experimental design was randomized blocks with three treatments (0, 60, and 120 g Ni ha<sup>−1</sup>, using nickel chloride) and eight replications. Foliar application of Ni was performed by applying half of the rate at flowering and half during grain filling. The results showed that application of 60 and 120 g Ni increased the GY by 4.0% and 6.4% compared to the control in BRS 399RR in the first season. For BRS 284, no significant differences were observed in either season. N concentration in leaves improved by 7.1% and 7.8%, in the first and 18.5% and 14.0% in the second season under 60 and 120 g Ni rates, respectively, compared to control in BRS 284. For BRS 399RR, the leaf content of N increased 16.5% and 14.5% for both Ni rates compared to the control only in the first season. However, only in the second season, spraying 60 and 120 g Ni increased the N concentration in the grains by 7.9% and 22.4% for BRS 284 compared to the control. The effects of foliar Ni spray vary among soybean cultivars and dry periods, which influence N supply, use efficiency, and GY.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144853678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improved the yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) yield: A review article” 对“农家肥和氮磷硫肥提高洋葱产量——综述文章”的修正
IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1002/cft2.70076

Gelaye, Y., & Mengistu, A. (2025). Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improved the yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) yield: A review article. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 11(2), e70064. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70064

Due to a miscommunication during production, the title, “Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improved the yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) yield: A review article” was incorrect. The correct title, “Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improve the yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) crop: A review article” has been updated in the published version.

Additionally, the following reference:

Abebe, A., & Tana, P. (2021). Effect of combined application of vermicompost and inorganic NPS fertilizers on yield related traits, yield and shelf life of shallot [Allium cepa var. Ascalonicum Backer] at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia. Haramaya University.

Has been revised as follows:

Abebe, A., & Tana, P. (2021). Effect of combined application of vermicompost and inorganic NPS fertilizers on yield related traits, yield and shelf life of shallot [Allium cepa var. Ascalonicum Backer] at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia [Master's thesis, Haramaya University]. http://ir.haramaya.edu.et/hru/handle/123456789/4019?show=full

We apologize for these errors.

格莱耶,Y.;Mengistu, A.(2025)。农家肥和氮磷硫肥提高洋葱产量的研究进展。作物、饲料及;草坪管理,11(2),e700 - 64。https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70064Due由于生产过程中的误解,标题“农家肥和氮磷硫肥提高洋葱产量:一篇综述文章”是不正确的。正确的标题“农家肥和氮磷硫肥提高洋葱(Allium cepa L.)作物产量:综述文章”已在已发表的版本中更新。此外,以下参考文献:Abebe, A., &;Tana, P.(2021)。蚯蚓堆肥与无机氮磷肥配施对埃塞俄比亚东部哈拉玛亚大葱产量相关性状、产量和保质期的影响Haramaya大学。已修改如下:Abebe, A., &;Tana, P.(2021)。蚯蚓堆肥与无机氮磷肥配施对埃塞俄比亚东部哈拉马亚大葱产量相关性状、产量及保质期的影响[硕士论文,哈拉马亚大学]。http://ir.haramaya.edu.et/hru/handle/123456789/4019?show=fullWe为这些错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improved the yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) yield: A review article”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70076","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cft2.70076","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gelaye, Y., &amp; Mengistu, A. (2025). Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improved the yield of onion (<i>Allium cepa</i> L.) yield: A review article. <i>Crop, Forage &amp; Turfgrass Management</i>, <i>11</i>(2), e70064. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70064</p><p>Due to a miscommunication during production, the title, “Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improved the yield of onion (<i>Allium cepa</i> L.) yield: A review article” was incorrect. The correct title, “Farmyard manure and nitrogen‒phosphorus‒sulfur fertilizers improve the yield of onion (<i>Allium cepa</i> L.) crop: A review article” has been updated in the published version.</p><p>Additionally, the following reference:</p><p>Abebe, A., &amp; Tana, P. (2021). <i>Effect of combined application of vermicompost and inorganic NPS fertilizers on yield related traits, yield and shelf life of shallot [Allium cepa</i> var. <i>Ascalonicum Backer] at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia</i>. Haramaya University.</p><p>Has been revised as follows:</p><p>Abebe, A., &amp; Tana, P. (2021). <i>Effect of combined application of vermicompost and inorganic NPS fertilizers on yield related traits, yield and shelf life of shallot [Allium cepa</i> var. <i>Ascalonicum Backer] at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia</i> [Master's thesis, Haramaya University]. http://ir.haramaya.edu.et/hru/handle/123456789/4019?show=full</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70076","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144843547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1