Background: Optimal dimensional stability is required for successful root canal treatment. A sealant called EndoSeal mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was recently introduced to the market due to its favorable physical and chemical properties. On the other hand, AH Plus (AHP) is considered the gold-standard seal.
Materials and methods: In this exvivo quasi-experimental study, 24 single-canal premolars extracted from humans were cleaned and shaped with a motorized and rotary file, then that is divided into two groups. The teeth of each group were filled with gutta F3 and each type of sealant. The teeth were scanned by a micro-computed tomography device after 24 h. After 7 days of storage in phosphate-buffered saline solution, the samples were re-scanned. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 21). Descriptive data were presented as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to investigate the normality of the data. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two groups, and the differences were ultimately not significant. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (P < 0.05).
Results: The mean differences between sealer volumes before and after the intervention were not significantly different between the two groups indicating that the EndoSeal MTA sealer is not inferior to the gold-standard root canal sealer, AHP.
Conclusion: EndoSeal MTA can be considered a reliable sealer in endodontic treatments and be subjected to further investigation.
{"title":"Evaluation of dimensional changes in EndoSeal mineral trioxide aggregate and AH Plus sealers using micro-computed tomography imaging.","authors":"Salma Omidi, Mostafa Dehghani, Mona Alimohamadi, Jamshid Yazdani Charati, Reihaneh Sadat Hashemi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal dimensional stability is required for successful root canal treatment. A sealant called EndoSeal mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was recently introduced to the market due to its favorable physical and chemical properties. On the other hand, AH Plus (AHP) is considered the gold-standard seal.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this <i>ex</i> <i>vivo</i> quasi-experimental study, 24 single-canal premolars extracted from humans were cleaned and shaped with a motorized and rotary file, then that is divided into two groups. The teeth of each group were filled with gutta F3 and each type of sealant. The teeth were scanned by a micro-computed tomography device after 24 h. After 7 days of storage in phosphate-buffered saline solution, the samples were re-scanned. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 21). Descriptive data were presented as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to investigate the normality of the data. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two groups, and the differences were ultimately not significant. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean differences between sealer volumes before and after the intervention were not significantly different between the two groups indicating that the EndoSeal MTA sealer is not inferior to the gold-standard root canal sealer, AHP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EndoSeal MTA can be considered a reliable sealer in endodontic treatments and be subjected to further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346603/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Various methods, including the use of probiotics, have been suggested to prevent caries. Caries, which is mainly caused by Streptococcus mutans, is one of the bacterial diseases that imposes a heavy cost on society. The present study was conducted to investigate the probiotic products available in Iranian pharmacies that are used for caries prevention.
Materials and methods: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 40 students of medicine and pharmacy were randomly allocated to two equal groups of intervention and control using random allocation software. The intervention group used a probiotic pill containing Streptococcussalivarius M18 and K12 bacteria every night before going to bed. The control group used a mouth freshener tablet with the same flavor as the probiotic tablet every night before going to bed. The data were analyzed by SPSS (version 24) software using descriptive statistics (central tendency and dispersion) and inferential statistics (paired t-test and independent t-test). Data were collected using Excel software, and statistical analyses were performed by SPSS software (version 24).
Results: The mean number of S.mutans in the intervention group was 754.5 cfu/mm before the intervention and 1701.5 cfu/mm after the intervention, which showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In the control group, the mean S. mutans was 683 cfu/mm at the beginning of the intervention and 659 cfu/mm at the end of the intervention, which did not indicate a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Moreover, the normality of data was checked by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Conclusion: The mean number of S. mutans bacteria in the group using probiotic tablets was significantly increased compared to those of the control group. However, further studies are suggested to evaluate these products.
{"title":"Evaluation of the effects of <i>Streptococcus salivarius</i> M18 and K12 probiotic bacteria on the <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> in saliva: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Firoozeh Nilchian, Mohammadreza Esrafili, Nafiseh Hosseini","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various methods, including the use of probiotics, have been suggested to prevent caries. Caries, which is mainly caused by <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>, is one of the bacterial diseases that imposes a heavy cost on society. The present study was conducted to investigate the probiotic products available in Iranian pharmacies that are used for caries prevention.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 40 students of medicine and pharmacy were randomly allocated to two equal groups of intervention and control using random allocation software. The intervention group used a probiotic pill containing <i>Streptococcus</i> <i>salivarius</i> M18 and K12 bacteria every night before going to bed. The control group used a mouth freshener tablet with the same flavor as the probiotic tablet every night before going to bed. The data were analyzed by SPSS (version 24) software using descriptive statistics (central tendency and dispersion) and inferential statistics (paired <i>t</i>-test and independent <i>t</i>-test). Data were collected using Excel software, and statistical analyses were performed by SPSS software (version 24).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of <i>S.</i> <i>mutans</i> in the intervention group was 754.5 cfu/mm before the intervention and 1701.5 cfu/mm after the intervention, which showed a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In the control group, the mean <i>S. mutans</i> was 683 cfu/mm at the beginning of the intervention and 659 cfu/mm at the end of the intervention, which did not indicate a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Moreover, the normality of data was checked by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mean number of <i>S. mutans</i> bacteria in the group using probiotic tablets was significantly increased compared to those of the control group. However, further studies are suggested to evaluate these products.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346607/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical decision-making and biomedical research heavily rely on imaging techniques to visualize tissue morphology. To examine tissues in detail, it is necessary to use special histochemical stains to enhance contrast. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of these stains in diagnosing oral pathologic specimens. We conducted a search in 8 databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Ovid, Cinahl, and Cochrane, up to June 2022. Of 87,393 studies, 41 articles were selected for inclusion in our study. The results revealed that the specificity and sensitivity of the special histochemical stains were 86% with confidence interval (CI) 95%: 80%-90% and 83% with CI 95%: 75%-89%, respectively. Among the stains evaluated, toluidine blue, Papanicolaou, silver stain, Giemsa, Gram, feulgen, and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) were the most frequently used for the detection of malignancy, premalignant lesions, dysplasia, and candidiasis. The specificity and sensitivity of each stain were analyzed individually, considering the type of specimen. Toluidine blue was the most commonly utilized special histochemical stain, particularly effective, for detecting malignancy, with a specificity of 97% with CI 95%: 88%-99% and sensitivity of 76% with CI 95%: 56%-89%. In conclusion, special histochemical stains are effective in diagnosing oral lesions, exhibiting reasonable specificity and sensitivity, especially in cases of premalignant and malignant lesions. Based on the reviewed articles in our study, the silver stain was identified as highly sensitive, while Giemsa and Papanicolaou stain exhibited the highest specificity.
{"title":"Accuracy of special histochemical staining methods in diagnosis of oral pathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maryam Ghelichli, Abdolhalim Rajabi, Niyayesh Mirsaeedi, Masoud Mohammadi, Sina Sohrabi, Niloufar Darabi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical decision-making and biomedical research heavily rely on imaging techniques to visualize tissue morphology. To examine tissues in detail, it is necessary to use special histochemical stains to enhance contrast. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of these stains in diagnosing oral pathologic specimens. We conducted a search in 8 databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Ovid, Cinahl, and Cochrane, up to June 2022. Of 87,393 studies, 41 articles were selected for inclusion in our study. The results revealed that the specificity and sensitivity of the special histochemical stains were 86% with confidence interval (CI) 95%: 80%-90% and 83% with CI 95%: 75%-89%, respectively. Among the stains evaluated, toluidine blue, Papanicolaou, silver stain, Giemsa, Gram, feulgen, and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) were the most frequently used for the detection of malignancy, premalignant lesions, dysplasia, and candidiasis. The specificity and sensitivity of each stain were analyzed individually, considering the type of specimen. Toluidine blue was the most commonly utilized special histochemical stain, particularly effective, for detecting malignancy, with a specificity of 97% with CI 95%: 88%-99% and sensitivity of 76% with CI 95%: 56%-89%. In conclusion, special histochemical stains are effective in diagnosing oral lesions, exhibiting reasonable specificity and sensitivity, especially in cases of premalignant and malignant lesions. Based on the reviewed articles in our study, the silver stain was identified as highly sensitive, while Giemsa and Papanicolaou stain exhibited the highest specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346618/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In this study, the effects of pure AH Plus sealer and its combination with triple antibiotic paste at different concentrations on Enterococcus faecalis bacteria have been investigated.
Materials and methods: This in vitro study was accomplished by the means of a triple antibiotic paste combination (minocycline, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin) at different concentrations (0%, 1%, 5%, 10%, and 25%) with AH Plus sealer on E.faecalis bacteria. Sealers were set in an incubator for 1 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days, and then 10 µL of bacteria solution was placed on all samples except the negative control group. After drying for 1 h, 250 µL brain-heart infusion broth culture medium was added, and it was cultured in solid media. Direct contact test technique was performed, and the obtained data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA, 2-way ANOVA, 3-way ANOVA, and posthoc test least significant difference. It should be noted that the data were evaluated at the significance level of P < 0.05.
Results: The average of colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL illustrated that there were no significant differences between fresh antibiotic-sealer combination, 1-day set, and 3-day set (P = 0.525), while in sealer with 7-day set, the average of CFU/mL was notably lower than other sets (P < 0.001). The outcomes revealed a considerable variation by passing time and the number of CFU/mL was remarkably reduced (P < 0.05). The data suggested that, by increasing the concentration, the average of CFU/mL was decreased, whereas the average of CFU/mL did not have significant differences in all concentrations of the antibiotic-sealer combination compared to pure sealer (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The concentration of 1% triple antibiotic in combination with root canal sealer may become a crucial factor for inhibiting the growth of remaining bacteria.
{"title":"Comparative study of the pure AH Plus sealer and its combination with triple antibiotic paste at different concentrations on <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> bacteria.","authors":"Amirreza Mokabberi, Sohyla Aminoroaya Yamini, Arezoo Tahmourespour, Maryam Zare Jahromi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, the effects of pure AH Plus sealer and its combination with triple antibiotic paste at different concentrations on <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> bacteria have been investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study was accomplished by the means of a triple antibiotic paste combination (minocycline, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin) at different concentrations (0%, 1%, 5%, 10%, and 25%) with AH Plus sealer on <i>E.</i> <i>faecalis</i> bacteria. Sealers were set in an incubator for 1 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days, and then 10 µL of bacteria solution was placed on all samples except the negative control group. After drying for 1 h, 250 µL brain-heart infusion broth culture medium was added, and it was cultured in solid media. Direct contact test technique was performed, and the obtained data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA, 2-way ANOVA, 3-way ANOVA, and <i>post</i> <i>hoc</i> test least significant difference. It should be noted that the data were evaluated at the significance level of <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average of colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL illustrated that there were no significant differences between fresh antibiotic-sealer combination, 1-day set, and 3-day set (<i>P</i> = 0.525), while in sealer with 7-day set, the average of CFU/mL was notably lower than other sets (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The outcomes revealed a considerable variation by passing time and the number of CFU/mL was remarkably reduced (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The data suggested that, by increasing the concentration, the average of CFU/mL was decreased, whereas the average of CFU/mL did not have significant differences in all concentrations of the antibiotic-sealer combination compared to pure sealer (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concentration of 1% triple antibiotic in combination with root canal sealer may become a crucial factor for inhibiting the growth of remaining bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346604/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft (PPG) as a barrier membrane in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for gingival recession, intrabony, and furcation defects.
Materials and methods: Electronic and hand searches were performed to identify randomized controlled/clinical trials investigating GTR using PPG, with 6-month follow-up. Primary outcomes recorded: probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bone fill, recession depth (RD) reduction, percentage of mean root coverage, keratinized tissue width (KTW), and bone defect area (BDA).
Results: Thirteen articles were selected; 6 for recession, 2 for furcation, and 5 for intrabony. Meta-analysis was performed whenever possible, results expressed as pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs). In recession defects, the RD pooled SMD is 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) = [-0.50-1.44]), KTW pooled SMD is 1.30 (95% CI = [-0.30-2.91]), favoring PPG over the comparator. In furcation defects, PD pooled SMD is 1.12 (95% CI = [-2.77-0.52]), CAL pooled SMD is 0.71 (95% CI = [-1.09-2.50]), and bone fill pooled SMD is 0.67 (95% CI = [-3.34-4.69]) favoring PPG. In intrabony defects, PD pooled SMD is 0.54 (95% CI = [-2.12-1.04]), CAL pooled SMD is 0.23 (95% CI = [-1.13-0.68]), and BDA pooled SMD is 0.37 (95% CI = [-1.58-2.31]) favoring PPG. The results were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The current evidence indicates that PPG constitutes a valid and reliable alternative to collagen barrier membranes for successful GTR.
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft as a barrier membrane in guided tissue regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shraddha Iyer, Sangamithra Sidharthan, Dharmarajan Gopalakrishnan, Vini Mehta, Chetana Chetana, Meghana Guruprasad, Sharvari Killedar","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft (PPG) as a barrier membrane in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for gingival recession, intrabony, and furcation defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Electronic and hand searches were performed to identify randomized controlled/clinical trials investigating GTR using PPG, with 6-month follow-up. Primary outcomes recorded: probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bone fill, recession depth (RD) reduction, percentage of mean root coverage, keratinized tissue width (KTW), and bone defect area (BDA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen articles were selected; 6 for recession, 2 for furcation, and 5 for intrabony. Meta-analysis was performed whenever possible, results expressed as pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs). In recession defects, the RD pooled SMD is 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) = [-0.50-1.44]), KTW pooled SMD is 1.30 (95% CI = [-0.30-2.91]), favoring PPG over the comparator. In furcation defects, PD pooled SMD is 1.12 (95% CI = [-2.77-0.52]), CAL pooled SMD is 0.71 (95% CI = [-1.09-2.50]), and bone fill pooled SMD is 0.67 (95% CI = [-3.34-4.69]) favoring PPG. In intrabony defects, PD pooled SMD is 0.54 (95% CI = [-2.12-1.04]), CAL pooled SMD is 0.23 (95% CI = [-1.13-0.68]), and BDA pooled SMD is 0.37 (95% CI = [-1.58-2.31]) favoring PPG. The results were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current evidence indicates that PPG constitutes a valid and reliable alternative to collagen barrier membranes for successful GTR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of oral health prevention materials have conventionally used indices to evaluate the amount of plaque on tooth surfaces. Various methods, including the use of probiotics, have been suggested to prevent oral disease. The present study was conducted to investigate the probiotic products available in Iranian pharmacies that are used for the prevention of dental disease.
Materials and methods: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 40 students of medicine and pharmacy were randomly allocated into two equal groups of intervention and control using random allocation software. The intervention group used a probiotic pill containing Streptococcus salivarius M18 and K12 bacteria every night before going to bed. The control group used a mouth freshener tablet with the same flavor as the probiotic tablet every night before going to bed. The mean number of Streptococcus mutans bacteria in both the groups was calculated before and after using probiotic pills. The data were staticali analyzed by descriptive statistics (central tendency and dispersion) and inferential statistics (paired t-test and independent t-test) and Kolmogorov-Smironove tests (P<0.05).
Results: The plaque index values at the beginning of the study showed no statistical differences between the intervention and control groups (P = 0.85). The plaque index values in the intervention group before and after the intervention were 0.41 and 0.75, respectively, which showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The plaque index values in the control group before and after the intervention were 0.42 and 0.42, respectively, which indicated no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The mean plaque index in the group using probiotic tablets was significantly increased compared to those of the control group. However, further studies are suggested to evaluate these products.
{"title":"Evaluation of the effects of probiotic pills on the oral plaque indices: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Firoozeh Nilchian, Mohammadreza Esrafili, Nafiseh Hosseini","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of oral health prevention materials have conventionally used indices to evaluate the amount of plaque on tooth surfaces. Various methods, including the use of probiotics, have been suggested to prevent oral disease. The present study was conducted to investigate the probiotic products available in Iranian pharmacies that are used for the prevention of dental disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 40 students of medicine and pharmacy were randomly allocated into two equal groups of intervention and control using random allocation software. The intervention group used a probiotic pill containing <i>Streptococcus salivarius</i> M18 and K12 bacteria every night before going to bed. The control group used a mouth freshener tablet with the same flavor as the probiotic tablet every night before going to bed. The mean number of <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> bacteria in both the groups was calculated before and after using probiotic pills. The data were staticali analyzed by descriptive statistics (central tendency and dispersion) and inferential statistics (paired <i>t</i>-test and independent <i>t</i>-test) and Kolmogorov-Smironove tests (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The plaque index values at the beginning of the study showed no statistical differences between the intervention and control groups (<i>P</i> = 0.85). The plaque index values in the intervention group before and after the intervention were 0.41 and 0.75, respectively, which showed a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The plaque index values in the control group before and after the intervention were 0.42 and 0.42, respectively, which indicated no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mean plaque index in the group using probiotic tablets was significantly increased compared to those of the control group. However, further studies are suggested to evaluate these products.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346608/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: To provide a continuous seal of the root canal, root-filling material should bond to the root canal dentin, ensuring the integrity of both the root-filling material and dentin remains in a static and functional state. The present study assessed the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and cold ceramic (CC).
Materials and methods: In this laboratory trial study, 20 single-rooted, extracted human teeth without caries and cracks were selected. Each tooth was mounted in cold-curing resin. Then, 3 mm slices of mid-root dentin were obtained from each tooth. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10) and filled with MTA ProRoot and CC. All specimens were stored for 30 days in an incubator at 37°C and 100% humidity. The push-out bond strength of the test materials was measured using a cylindrical punch with a 1-mm diameter. The punch was pushed against the test specimen at a speed of 1.0 mm/min using a universal material testing machine, extruding the filling test material. The push-out force during the test was recorded, and then, the internal surface of the teeth was examined to evaluate the mode of failure. Independent t-test and Chi-square were used to analyze the data. P < 0.05 was considered a significance threshold.
Results: The mean push-out bond strength in the CC group was 24.58 (MPa), and in MTA ProRoot, it was 23.77. No significant difference was observed between the two groups. The most frequent mode of failure in both groups was adhesive failure.
Conclusion: The two materials have adequate push-out bond strength to root dentin, and there is no difference between the bond strength and mode of failure of the two materials.
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> assessment of push-out bond strength of cold ceramic and mineral trioxide aggregate to root dentin.","authors":"Fatemeh Mokhtari, Laleh Akhondzadeh-Kashani, Jalil Modaresi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To provide a continuous seal of the root canal, root-filling material should bond to the root canal dentin, ensuring the integrity of both the root-filling material and dentin remains in a static and functional state. The present study assessed the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and cold ceramic (CC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this laboratory trial study, 20 single-rooted, extracted human teeth without caries and cracks were selected. Each tooth was mounted in cold-curing resin. Then, 3 mm slices of mid-root dentin were obtained from each tooth. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 10) and filled with MTA ProRoot and CC. All specimens were stored for 30 days in an incubator at 37°C and 100% humidity. The push-out bond strength of the test materials was measured using a cylindrical punch with a 1-mm diameter. The punch was pushed against the test specimen at a speed of 1.0 mm/min using a universal material testing machine, extruding the filling test material. The push-out force during the test was recorded, and then, the internal surface of the teeth was examined to evaluate the mode of failure. Independent <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square were used to analyze the data. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered a significance threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean push-out bond strength in the CC group was 24.58 (MPa), and in MTA ProRoot, it was 23.77. No significant difference was observed between the two groups. The most frequent mode of failure in both groups was adhesive failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two materials have adequate push-out bond strength to root dentin, and there is no difference between the bond strength and mode of failure of the two materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346617/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: There is limited literature available comparing the accuracy of intraradicular impressions made with a novel hybrid impression material using the indirect and direct technique at three different locations.
Materials and methods: For this comparative in vitro analysis, postspace was prepared in 15 recently extracted teeth and impressions made with vinyl polysiloxane, polyether (PE), vinyl polyether silicone (VPES), and pattern resin. Postpatterns obtained were re-seated on the teeth and longitudinally sectioned. A binocular microscope was used to measure apical and lateral discrepancies at three locations (L1, L2, and L3). L1 at the postcore junction, L2 at the middle of the post space, and L3, 2 mm short of the apical end. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (intergroup) followed by Tukey's posthoc test with P ≤ 0.05 was used.
Results: The one-way ANOVA noted a highly significant difference at the apical location. Pattern resin had the highest apical discrepancy (151.93 ± 8.59 µm), whereas the lowest was with vinyl PE silicone (140.31 ± 11.46 µm). At L1, the highest discrepancy was seen with pattern resin (32.09 ± 2.31 µm), whereas the lowest was with the addition silicone (31.94 ± 2.54 µm). At L2, addition silicone (32.88 ± 2.81 µm) showed the highest discrepancy, whereas the lowest was with vinyl PE silicone (30.5 ± 8.79 µm). The PE group had the highest mean at the L3 location (31.38 ± 3.46 µm) and the lowest was with vinyl PE silicone (30.93 ± 2.25 µm). At all lateral locations, no significant difference was noted. Tukey's posthoc comparison showed a significant difference between pattern resin and VPES (11.62 µm) followed by pattern resin and addition silicone (11.47 µm) apically.
Conclusion: The indirect technique using VPES or addition silicone is more accurate than the direct technique at the apical location.
{"title":"Apical and lateral accuracy of intraradicular impressions made using the indirect and direct technique at three different locations: A comparative <i>in vitro</i> analysis.","authors":"Godwin Clovis Da Costa, Praveen Rajagopal, Meena Ajay Aras, Amanda Nadia Ferreira","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited literature available comparing the accuracy of intraradicular impressions made with a novel hybrid impression material using the indirect and direct technique at three different locations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For this comparative <i>in vitro</i> analysis, postspace was prepared in 15 recently extracted teeth and impressions made with vinyl polysiloxane, polyether (PE), vinyl polyether silicone (VPES), and pattern resin. Postpatterns obtained were re-seated on the teeth and longitudinally sectioned. A binocular microscope was used to measure apical and lateral discrepancies at three locations (L1, L2, and L3). L1 at the postcore junction, L2 at the middle of the post space, and L3, 2 mm short of the apical end. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (intergroup) followed by Tukey's <i>post</i> <i>hoc</i> test with <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05 was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-way ANOVA noted a highly significant difference at the apical location. Pattern resin had the highest apical discrepancy (151.93 ± 8.59 µm), whereas the lowest was with vinyl PE silicone (140.31 ± 11.46 µm). At L1, the highest discrepancy was seen with pattern resin (32.09 ± 2.31 µm), whereas the lowest was with the addition silicone (31.94 ± 2.54 µm). At L2, addition silicone (32.88 ± 2.81 µm) showed the highest discrepancy, whereas the lowest was with vinyl PE silicone (30.5 ± 8.79 µm). The PE group had the highest mean at the L3 location (31.38 ± 3.46 µm) and the lowest was with vinyl PE silicone (30.93 ± 2.25 µm). At all lateral locations, no significant difference was noted. Tukey's <i>post</i> <i>hoc</i> comparison showed a significant difference between pattern resin and VPES (11.62 µm) followed by pattern resin and addition silicone (11.47 µm) apically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The indirect technique using VPES or addition silicone is more accurate than the direct technique at the apical location.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Dental pulp regeneration aims to restore the function and vitality of the dental pulp, which is the soft tissue inside the tooth. Research in this field is effective in trying to improve clinical practices and procedures. This study aimed to analyze the literature related to dental pulp regeneration and to create a documented research perspective for this field.
Materials and methods: This bibliometric study analyzes the research outputs of the subject area of dental pulp regeneration indexed in the Web of Science database between 2013 and 2023. SciMAT software was used to visualize and predict the trends in research on the topic.
Results: In general, it has been observed that the stem cell cluster consistently had the highest number of articles across all periods. As we progressed through time, the significance of this cluster continued to grow, eventually becoming a crucial component in the motor theme during the last period. In addition, a significant portion of the studies conducted during different periods focused on identifying suitable materials for scaffold formation. Various materials, including polymers and bioactive glasses, were proposed as viable options for scaffold formation in different periods.
Conclusion: Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), scaffold networks, growth factors, and regulatory factors are the three main factors that influence dental pulp regeneration. By analyzing maps and thematic clusters in dental pulp regeneration research, as well as considering indicators such as repetition frequency, centrality, and citation of these clusters, researchers can identify the strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in current research.
背景:牙髓再生旨在恢复牙髓(牙齿内部的软组织)的功能和活力。该领域的研究能有效改善临床实践和程序。本研究旨在分析与牙髓再生相关的文献,并为这一领域创建一个有据可查的研究视角:这项文献计量学研究分析了2013年至2023年期间被Web of Science数据库收录的牙髓再生主题领域的研究成果。结果:总体而言,牙髓再生领域的研究成果呈上升趋势:总的来说,干细胞群组在各个时期的文章数量都是最多的。随着时间的推移,该专题组的重要性不断增加,最终在最后一个时期成为运动主题的重要组成部分。此外,在不同时期进行的研究中,有很大一部分都集中在确定支架形成的合适材料上。在不同时期,包括聚合物和生物活性玻璃在内的各种材料被提出作为支架形成的可行方案:牙髓干细胞(DPSC)、支架网络、生长因子和调节因子是影响牙髓再生的三个主要因素。通过分析牙髓再生研究中的地图和主题集群,以及考虑这些集群的重复频率、中心性和引用等指标,研究人员可以找出当前研究的优势、劣势和差距。
{"title":"Mapping global research in dental pulp regeneration: A 10-year bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Yeganeh-Sadat Mostafavi, Pedram Iranmanesh, Abbasali Khademi, Raheleh Mehrabi, Fatemeh Sheikhshoaei, Masoud Mohammadi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental pulp regeneration aims to restore the function and vitality of the dental pulp, which is the soft tissue inside the tooth. Research in this field is effective in trying to improve clinical practices and procedures. This study aimed to analyze the literature related to dental pulp regeneration and to create a documented research perspective for this field.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This bibliometric study analyzes the research outputs of the subject area of dental pulp regeneration indexed in the Web of Science database between 2013 and 2023. SciMAT software was used to visualize and predict the trends in research on the topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, it has been observed that the stem cell cluster consistently had the highest number of articles across all periods. As we progressed through time, the significance of this cluster continued to grow, eventually becoming a crucial component in the motor theme during the last period. In addition, a significant portion of the studies conducted during different periods focused on identifying suitable materials for scaffold formation. Various materials, including polymers and bioactive glasses, were proposed as viable options for scaffold formation in different periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), scaffold networks, growth factors, and regulatory factors are the three main factors that influence dental pulp regeneration. By analyzing maps and thematic clusters in dental pulp regeneration research, as well as considering indicators such as repetition frequency, centrality, and citation of these clusters, researchers can identify the strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in current research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346601/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R Jayabalan, Ambika Murugesan, Sekar Balakrishnan, Maya Ramesh
Background: This study aims to compare the efficacy between conventional exfoliative cytology (EC) and centrifuged liquid-based cytology (CLBC) in control, leukoplakia, and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients. Oral leukoplakia and oral cancer require an early definitive diagnosis for better prognostic outcome. Oral EC, a minimally invasive technique that involves the examination of desquamated cells from the tissue surfaces used as a method of early diagnosis. CLBC is a modified technique that is used to achieve improved quality of the cytology findings.
Materials and methods: A comparative study was done in 30 subjects, of which, 10 cases from control group, 10 oral leukoplakia, and 10 OSCC cases. These subjects were selected according to the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cases in each group underwent conventional as well as CLBC. The comparison was carried out between these groups with respect to the cellular and background stromal factors. Appropriate qualitative evaluation of the samples was collected and statistical analysis was done using the Chi-squared test. The significance level of value was P < 0.05.
Results: Significant results were obtained for certain parameters such as cellular overlap clear background, uniform distribution in control, leukoplakia, and OSCC with a P = 0.004**, P = 0.001**, P = 0.006** using CLBC.
Conclusion: CLBC is better and give clearer vision as compared to conventional cytology and can be used in the early diagnosis.
{"title":"Comparative study of conventional exfoliative cytology and centrifuged liquid-based cytology in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.","authors":"R Jayabalan, Ambika Murugesan, Sekar Balakrishnan, Maya Ramesh","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy between conventional exfoliative cytology (EC) and centrifuged liquid-based cytology (CLBC) in control, leukoplakia, and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients. Oral leukoplakia and oral cancer require an early definitive diagnosis for better prognostic outcome. Oral EC, a minimally invasive technique that involves the examination of desquamated cells from the tissue surfaces used as a method of early diagnosis. CLBC is a modified technique that is used to achieve improved quality of the cytology findings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comparative study was done in 30 subjects, of which, 10 cases from control group, 10 oral leukoplakia, and 10 OSCC cases. These subjects were selected according to the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cases in each group underwent conventional as well as CLBC. The comparison was carried out between these groups with respect to the cellular and background stromal factors. Appropriate qualitative evaluation of the samples was collected and statistical analysis was done using the Chi-squared test. The significance level of value was <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant results were obtained for certain parameters such as cellular overlap clear background, uniform distribution in control, leukoplakia, and OSCC with a <i>P</i> = 0.004**, <i>P</i> = 0.001**, <i>P</i> = 0.006** using CLBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CLBC is better and give clearer vision as compared to conventional cytology and can be used in the early diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346596/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}