Pub Date : 2026-01-08eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103750
Heinz Ludwig, Efstathios Kastritis, Sarah Bernhard, Niels W C J van de Donk, Mario Boccadoro, Evangelos Terpos, Pellegrino Musto, Pieter Sonneveld, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin
Background: Diagnostic advancements and classification updates appear to have reshaped the natural history of smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), though this evolution has not been empirically quantified. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate temporal changes in SMM prognosis.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library databases were searched from January 1990 to November 2025, yielding 1415 reports, of which 14 studies met inclusion criteria. To reconstruct individual-level data, published time to progression (TTP) curves were digitized using a Shiny web application. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and meta-analyses were generated in RStudio. PROSPERO ID 1068697.
Findings: Progression risk at two and ten years for all-risk patients was 22.8% and 60.1%, respectively; these increased to 44.7% and 85.6% in high-risk patients. Landmark analysis from year five revealed attenuated progression rates: 14.2% and 30.8% for all-risk, and 22.5% and 50.6% for high-risk patients at two and five years post-landmark, respectively. Studies enrolling most patients before 2014 showed higher progression rates than in more recent cohorts (Spearman's rho = 0.645, p = 0.034), but this trend did not reach statistical significance in high-risk groups (rho = 0.360, p = 0.272). Meta-analytic data further supported elevated progression in older cohorts.
Interpretation: SMM appears to follow a more indolent trajectory in recent years, likely due to improved diagnostic precision and exclusion of biomarker-defined or subclinical MM. Enhanced predictive models may better guide therapeutic decision-making, targeting treatment to those most likely to benefit and avoiding the burden of unnecessary intervention in low-risk individuals.
Funding: Supported by the Austrian Forum Against Cancer.
背景:诊断的进步和分类的更新似乎已经重塑了阴燃多发性骨髓瘤(SMM)的自然历史,尽管这种演变尚未被经验量化。我们进行了一项系统综述来评估颞叶变化对SMM预后的影响。方法:检索1990年1月至2025年11月PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,共获得1415篇报道,其中14篇研究符合纳入标准。为了重建个人层面的数据,使用Shiny的web应用程序将发布的进度时间(TTP)曲线数字化。在RStudio中生成Kaplan-Meier (KM)生存曲线和meta分析。普洛斯彼罗id 1068697。结果:全危患者2年和10年的进展风险分别为22.8%和60.1%;在高危患者中,这一比例分别增加到44.7%和85.6%。从第5年开始的里程碑分析显示,在里程碑后2年和5年,全风险患者的进展率分别为14.2%和30.8%,高风险患者的进展率分别为22.5%和50.6%。在2014年之前纳入大多数患者的研究中,进展率高于最近的队列(Spearman’s rho = 0.645, p = 0.034),但这一趋势在高危组中没有统计学意义(rho = 0.360, p = 0.272)。荟萃分析数据进一步支持老年队列的进展加快。解释:近年来,SMM似乎遵循更惰性的轨迹,可能是由于提高了诊断精度和排除生物标志物定义或亚临床MM。增强的预测模型可以更好地指导治疗决策,针对那些最有可能受益的治疗,避免对低风险个体进行不必要干预的负担。资助:由奥地利抗癌论坛支持。
{"title":"Temporal trends in progression risk in smoldering myeloma: a systematic review.","authors":"Heinz Ludwig, Efstathios Kastritis, Sarah Bernhard, Niels W C J van de Donk, Mario Boccadoro, Evangelos Terpos, Pellegrino Musto, Pieter Sonneveld, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103750","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103750","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic advancements and classification updates appear to have reshaped the natural history of smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), though this evolution has not been empirically quantified. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate temporal changes in SMM prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library databases were searched from January 1990 to November 2025, yielding 1415 reports, of which 14 studies met inclusion criteria. To reconstruct individual-level data, published time to progression (TTP) curves were digitized using a Shiny web application. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and meta-analyses were generated in RStudio. PROSPERO ID 1068697.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Progression risk at two and ten years for all-risk patients was 22.8% and 60.1%, respectively; these increased to 44.7% and 85.6% in high-risk patients. Landmark analysis from year five revealed attenuated progression rates: 14.2% and 30.8% for all-risk, and 22.5% and 50.6% for high-risk patients at two and five years post-landmark, respectively. Studies enrolling most patients before 2014 showed higher progression rates than in more recent cohorts (Spearman's rho = 0.645, p = 0.034), but this trend did not reach statistical significance in high-risk groups (rho = 0.360, p = 0.272). Meta-analytic data further supported elevated progression in older cohorts.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>SMM appears to follow a more indolent trajectory in recent years, likely due to improved diagnostic precision and exclusion of biomarker-defined or subclinical MM. Enhanced predictive models may better guide therapeutic decision-making, targeting treatment to those most likely to benefit and avoiding the burden of unnecessary intervention in low-risk individuals.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Supported by the Austrian Forum Against Cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103750"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818083/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103751
Victoria Bradley, Livia Samara, Miriam Toolan, Amelia Atkinson, Deborah M Caldwell, Abigail Fraser, Shakila Thangaratinam, Gemma Clayton, Abi Merriel
Background: Globally, around 2 million pregnancies each year end in stillbirth, with the majority occurring in low and middle-income countries. The association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and stillbirth has been widely researched but the evidence is increasingly controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of stillbirth associated with GDM, and examine whether this risk differs according to country income status and GDM screening method.
Methods: We searched Scopus, Cinahl, Cochrane Central, ISRCTN, Medline, Embase and Epistemonikos on the 9th May 2025 from inception to May 2025 with no restrictions based on language, study location or time. We included cohort studies that estimated the association of interest. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis by study design and sub-group analyses by country income level and GDM screening method. (PROSPERO CRD4201800057).
Findings: 101 included studies (92,915,856 women) presented unadjusted results, 19 reported adjusted results (63,629,536 women). Meta-analysis of adjusted cohort data did not show evidence of an association between a diagnosis of GDM and the risk of stillbirth worldwide (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.97; I2 = 87.7%; n = 19 studies). However, when stratified by country income level a diagnosis of GDM was associated with a reduction in the odds of stillbirth in high income countries (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.82; I2 = 31.9%; n = 13 studies), but this was not observed in upper and lower middle income countries, (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.71-1.93; I2 = 59.7%; n = 6 studies). There were no adjusted estimates from low-income countries. There was no evidence of a difference by GDM screening method.
Interpretation: Increased screening, timely diagnosis and effective management strategies for GDM in high-income countries, such as induction of labour and increased antenatal care, may be responsible for the reduced risk of stillbirth in women with GDM. Further research is needed to identify the optimum strategy for screening and management in low and middle-income settings to reduce preventable stillbirths worldwide.
{"title":"Gestational diabetes and stillbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Victoria Bradley, Livia Samara, Miriam Toolan, Amelia Atkinson, Deborah M Caldwell, Abigail Fraser, Shakila Thangaratinam, Gemma Clayton, Abi Merriel","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103751","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103751","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, around 2 million pregnancies each year end in stillbirth, with the majority occurring in low and middle-income countries. The association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and stillbirth has been widely researched but the evidence is increasingly controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of stillbirth associated with GDM, and examine whether this risk differs according to country income status and GDM screening method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Scopus, Cinahl, Cochrane Central, ISRCTN, Medline, Embase and Epistemonikos on the 9th May 2025 from inception to May 2025 with no restrictions based on language, study location or time. We included cohort studies that estimated the association of interest. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis by study design and sub-group analyses by country income level and GDM screening method. (PROSPERO CRD4201800057).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>101 included studies (92,915,856 women) presented unadjusted results, 19 reported adjusted results (63,629,536 women). Meta-analysis of adjusted cohort data did not show evidence of an association between a diagnosis of GDM and the risk of stillbirth worldwide (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.97; I<sup>2</sup> = 87.7%; n = 19 studies). However, when stratified by country income level a diagnosis of GDM was associated with a reduction in the odds of stillbirth in high income countries (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.82; I<sup>2</sup> = 31.9%; n = 13 studies), but this was not observed in upper and lower middle income countries, (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.71-1.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 59.7%; n = 6 studies). There were no adjusted estimates from low-income countries. There was no evidence of a difference by GDM screening method.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Increased screening, timely diagnosis and effective management strategies for GDM in high-income countries, such as induction of labour and increased antenatal care, may be responsible for the reduced risk of stillbirth in women with GDM. Further research is needed to identify the optimum strategy for screening and management in low and middle-income settings to reduce preventable stillbirths worldwide.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103751"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103742
Zeynep Elmas, Christine Herrmann, Kathrin Kramer, Oender Soylu, Vanessa Roemer, Luisa Jagodzinski, Lars Richter, Maximilian Wiesenfarth, Tanja Fangerau, Stefanie Jung, Regina Gastl, Angela Rosenbohm, Jochen H Weishaupt, Makbule Senel, Benjamin Mayer, Hayrettin Tumani, Johannes Dorst
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune-inflammatory disease of the peripheral nervous system. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), and plasma exchange (PLEX) constitute the main therapeutic options, but immunoadsorption (IA) represents a noteworthy alternative to PLEX due to its excellent tolerability and its capability to remove higher rates of autoimmune antibodies. However, evidence of its therapeutic value in CIDP is low, while the effect of repeated IA as long-term therapy is largely unknown. Therefore, in this study, we sought to evaluate the short- and long-term therapeutic effects of IA in CIDP compared to PLEX and preceding therapies (IVIGs and corticosteroids).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 02/12/2013 and 03/03/2025, we prospectively evaluated the course of disease of patients with CIDP who received at least one cycle of IA or PLEX via Shaldon catheter or arteriovenous shunt. All patients were treated in the Department of Neurology of Ulm University, Germany. All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of typical CIDP according to the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) guideline on diagnosis and treatment of CIDP, had a continuously progressive course of disease, and had previously received treatment with steroids, IVIGs, or both, with insufficient response. All eligible patients who gave their informed consent were selected for the study. Participant data were collected and retrieved using individual case report forms and medical records. One cycle of IA or PLEX consisted of 5 treatments on 5 consecutive days. As the primary outcome parameter, we used a combined CIDP score of 3 validated scales comprising disability (Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score), motor score (Medical Research Council, MRC), and vibration sensitivity (tuning fork test). For short-term effects, we compared absolute CIDP scores 3 days before and directly after the last treatment of each cycle; for long-term effects, we compared changes of CIDP score per month during IA or PLEX compared to preceding treatments in patients with an observation period of at least 6 continuous months under IA or PLEX. We systematically evaluated adverse events (AEs), and collected safety laboratory data as well as immunoglobulin (Ig) reduction levels.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 80 patients were included, of which 74 received at least one cycle of IA, 25 received at least one cycle of PLEX, and 19 received at least one cycle of both IA and PLEX and were considered for both treatment groups for respective analyses. 41 IA patients and 16 PLEX patients received 2 or more cycles (median 4 (IQR 2-7.5), maximum 43 cycles) over a median time period of 12.0 (6.0-34.0) months in median time intervals of 2.5 (1.9-4.3) months. We observed improvements of CIDP scores post-treatment in the IA group (median improvement from 310 (224-374)
背景:慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多神经病变(CIDP)是一种周围神经系统的自身免疫性炎症性疾病。皮质类固醇、静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIGs)和血浆置换(PLEX)是主要的治疗选择,但免疫吸附(IA)由于其优异的耐受性和去除更高自身免疫抗体率的能力,是值得注意的PLEX替代方案。然而,它在CIDP中的治疗价值的证据很少,而重复IA作为长期治疗的效果在很大程度上是未知的。因此,在本研究中,我们试图评估IA在CIDP中的短期和长期治疗效果,与PLEX和之前的治疗方法(ivig和皮质类固醇)相比。方法:2013年12月2日至2025年3月3日期间,通过Shaldon导管或动静脉分流术接受至少一个周期IA或PLEX治疗的CIDP患者的病程进行前瞻性评估。所有患者均在德国乌尔姆大学神经内科接受治疗。所有患者均符合欧洲神经病学学会/周围神经学会(EAN/PNS) CIDP诊断和治疗指南的典型CIDP诊断标准,病程持续进展,既往曾接受类固醇、ivig或两者治疗,但反应不足。所有给予知情同意的符合条件的患者都被选中参加这项研究。使用个案报告表格和医疗记录收集和检索参与者数据。一个周期为连续5天5次治疗。作为主要结局参数,我们使用了由3个有效量表组成的综合CIDP评分,包括残疾(炎症性神经病变病因和治疗(INCAT)评分)、运动评分(医学研究委员会,MRC)和振动敏感性(音叉测试)。对于短期疗效,我们比较每个周期末次治疗前后3天的绝对CIDP评分;对于长期效果,我们比较了在IA或PLEX下观察期至少连续6个月的患者在IA或PLEX下每月CIDP评分与治疗前的变化。我们系统地评估了不良事件(ae),并收集了安全实验室数据以及免疫球蛋白(Ig)降低水平。结果:共纳入80例患者,其中74例接受了至少一个周期的IA, 25例接受了至少一个周期的PLEX, 19例同时接受了至少一个周期的IA和PLEX,并被考虑为两个治疗组进行各自的分析。41例IA患者和16例PLEX患者接受了2个或2个以上周期(中位4 (IQR 2-7.5),最大43个周期),中位时间间隔为2.5(1.9-4.3)个月,中位时间为12.0(6.0-34.0)个月。我们观察到IA组治疗后CIDP评分的改善(中位改善从310(224-374)到321(234-373)分;中位差为5.0 (95% CI 2.0-6.0), p < 0.0001),但PLEX组中位差为254(214-358)比254 (209-351);中位差为0.0 (95% CI为0.0-5.0,p = 0.12)。与之前的皮质类固醇和IVIG治疗相比,IA组的长期进展率从3.8(2.2-9.1)降至0.2(-0.5-2.2)点/月(中位数差值-4.0 (95% CI -6.9至-1.9),p < 0.0001), PLEX组从4.2(2.6-17.2)降至-1.1(-1.6-0.5)点/月(中位数差值-6.3 (95% CI -19.9至-1.9),p = 0.0010),对应于疾病进展的临床稳定。我们在240个IA周期中检测到12例(5.0%)无症状和3例(1.3%)有症状的颈静脉血栓形成,在PLEX组的79个周期中检测到6例(7.5%)颈静脉血栓形成(均无症状),这代表了两种手术的主要并发症。在两组中,低蛋白血症(IA 100%, PLEX 93.5%)、血小板减少症(IA 33.6%, PLEX 4.9%)和贫血(IA 21.6%, PLEX 61.8%)是治疗期间最常见的实验室发现。解释:我们的研究结果表明,对于对皮质类固醇和ivig没有充分反应的CIDP患者,重复IA和PLEX可能是有希望的治疗选择,可以稳定大多数患者的疾病。然而,它的侵入性和颈静脉血栓形成的重大风险必须考虑。研究的局限性包括非随机分组、既往治疗相关数据的回顾性收集、基线前治疗次优的可能性、有限的患者数量以及由于观察时间长导致的潜在干扰因素(如IA和PLEX之间的交叉)。由于这些局限性,研究结果不允许直接比较IA和PLEX之间的有效性,在这方面需要进一步的随机对照试验。资助:这是一项由研究者发起的研究,没有机构或行业资助。
{"title":"Evaluating the short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of immunoadsorption compared with plasma exchange in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a long-term, prospective, observational study.","authors":"Zeynep Elmas, Christine Herrmann, Kathrin Kramer, Oender Soylu, Vanessa Roemer, Luisa Jagodzinski, Lars Richter, Maximilian Wiesenfarth, Tanja Fangerau, Stefanie Jung, Regina Gastl, Angela Rosenbohm, Jochen H Weishaupt, Makbule Senel, Benjamin Mayer, Hayrettin Tumani, Johannes Dorst","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103742","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune-inflammatory disease of the peripheral nervous system. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), and plasma exchange (PLEX) constitute the main therapeutic options, but immunoadsorption (IA) represents a noteworthy alternative to PLEX due to its excellent tolerability and its capability to remove higher rates of autoimmune antibodies. However, evidence of its therapeutic value in CIDP is low, while the effect of repeated IA as long-term therapy is largely unknown. Therefore, in this study, we sought to evaluate the short- and long-term therapeutic effects of IA in CIDP compared to PLEX and preceding therapies (IVIGs and corticosteroids).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 02/12/2013 and 03/03/2025, we prospectively evaluated the course of disease of patients with CIDP who received at least one cycle of IA or PLEX via Shaldon catheter or arteriovenous shunt. All patients were treated in the Department of Neurology of Ulm University, Germany. All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of typical CIDP according to the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) guideline on diagnosis and treatment of CIDP, had a continuously progressive course of disease, and had previously received treatment with steroids, IVIGs, or both, with insufficient response. All eligible patients who gave their informed consent were selected for the study. Participant data were collected and retrieved using individual case report forms and medical records. One cycle of IA or PLEX consisted of 5 treatments on 5 consecutive days. As the primary outcome parameter, we used a combined CIDP score of 3 validated scales comprising disability (Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score), motor score (Medical Research Council, MRC), and vibration sensitivity (tuning fork test). For short-term effects, we compared absolute CIDP scores 3 days before and directly after the last treatment of each cycle; for long-term effects, we compared changes of CIDP score per month during IA or PLEX compared to preceding treatments in patients with an observation period of at least 6 continuous months under IA or PLEX. We systematically evaluated adverse events (AEs), and collected safety laboratory data as well as immunoglobulin (Ig) reduction levels.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 80 patients were included, of which 74 received at least one cycle of IA, 25 received at least one cycle of PLEX, and 19 received at least one cycle of both IA and PLEX and were considered for both treatment groups for respective analyses. 41 IA patients and 16 PLEX patients received 2 or more cycles (median 4 (IQR 2-7.5), maximum 43 cycles) over a median time period of 12.0 (6.0-34.0) months in median time intervals of 2.5 (1.9-4.3) months. We observed improvements of CIDP scores post-treatment in the IA group (median improvement from 310 (224-374) ","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103742"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818062/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103748
Andrea Amerio, Enrico Venturini, Mirko Capanna, Luca Ploner, Irene Schiavetti, Alessandra Costanza, Massimiliano Clausi, Paola Bertuccio, Anna Odone, Helen Minnis, Ruchika Gajwani, Renato de Filippis, Pasquale De Fazio, Mario Amore, Andrea Aguglia, Gianluca Serafini
Background: Suicide rates have risen among young people, making it a leading cause of adolescent death worldwide. Although several pharmacological treatments have been approved in the context of definite underlying conditions, their broader efficacy in reducing suicidality remains unclear.
Methods: A structured review was conducted on pharmacological treatments for suicidality in under 18s. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. Eligible studies included patients <18 years with suicidality treated with antidepressants, mood stabilisers, or antipsychotics. Exclusion criteria were non-pharmacological interventions, non-suicidal self-injury-only studies, reviews, and grey literature. Both interventional and observational designs were considered. Four authors independently screened, extracted, and appraised data using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The primary outcome was suicidality reduction, synthesised narratively. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024548628.
Findings: Twenty-three articles out of 1747 met inclusion criteria, totalling 2235 participants. Risk of bias across studies was low-to-moderate for nearly all studies (22/23). However, the majority employed weaker study designs and targeted underlying diagnoses, with suicidality rarely assessed as a primary outcome. Esketamine (four studies, n = 211) and ketamine (four, n = 6) use in major depressive disorder induced rapid reduction of acute suicidality within 24 h. In the longer term, lithium (three, n = 923) was beneficial in reducing suicidality in youths with bipolar disorder. Sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine and duloxetine (six, n = 906) yielded inconsistent results. Other agents, including valproate, lamotrigine and antipsychotics such as clozapine and quetiapine exhibited some benefit in reducing suicidality, but findings were limited to small-scale studies.
Interpretation: Evidence remains scarce and heterogeneous. Esketamine and lithium appear promising for acute and chronic suicidality, respectively. Further high-quality studies investigating suicidal thoughts and behaviours as independent treatment targets are needed to guide clinical decision-making.
{"title":"Exploring the effects of pharmacological treatments on suicidality in children and adolescents: a structured review of the literature and narrative synthesis.","authors":"Andrea Amerio, Enrico Venturini, Mirko Capanna, Luca Ploner, Irene Schiavetti, Alessandra Costanza, Massimiliano Clausi, Paola Bertuccio, Anna Odone, Helen Minnis, Ruchika Gajwani, Renato de Filippis, Pasquale De Fazio, Mario Amore, Andrea Aguglia, Gianluca Serafini","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103748","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103748","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide rates have risen among young people, making it a leading cause of adolescent death worldwide. Although several pharmacological treatments have been approved in the context of definite underlying conditions, their broader efficacy in reducing suicidality remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured review was conducted on pharmacological treatments for suicidality in under 18s. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. Eligible studies included patients <18 years with suicidality treated with antidepressants, mood stabilisers, or antipsychotics. Exclusion criteria were non-pharmacological interventions, non-suicidal self-injury-only studies, reviews, and grey literature. Both interventional and observational designs were considered. Four authors independently screened, extracted, and appraised data using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The primary outcome was suicidality reduction, synthesised narratively. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024548628.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Twenty-three articles out of 1747 met inclusion criteria, totalling 2235 participants. Risk of bias across studies was low-to-moderate for nearly all studies (22/23). However, the majority employed weaker study designs and targeted underlying diagnoses, with suicidality rarely assessed as a primary outcome. Esketamine (four studies, <i>n</i> = 211) and ketamine (four, <i>n</i> = 6) use in major depressive disorder induced rapid reduction of acute suicidality within 24 h. In the longer term, lithium (three, <i>n</i> = 923) was beneficial in reducing suicidality in youths with bipolar disorder. Sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine and duloxetine (six, <i>n</i> = 906) yielded inconsistent results. Other agents, including valproate, lamotrigine and antipsychotics such as clozapine and quetiapine exhibited some benefit in reducing suicidality, but findings were limited to small-scale studies.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Evidence remains scarce and heterogeneous. Esketamine and lithium appear promising for acute and chronic suicidality, respectively. Further high-quality studies investigating suicidal thoughts and behaviours as independent treatment targets are needed to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103748"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12814428/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103734
Felicity Evison, Suzy Gallier, Fatima Malik, Charlotte Stephens, Charles J Ferro, Jonathan Townend, William Moody, Matthew J Armstrong, Adnan Sharif
Background: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are common early after liver transplantation (LT) as reported in the United States, but incidence is not well described in a European cohort. With lower MACE rates reported after kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom versus the United States, it is important to determine if a similar incongruity exists after LT.
Methods: In this large retrospective, population cohort study, we studied all LT procedures performed in England between 1st April 2002 and 31st March 2023 (n = 10,213). MACE data was obtained from Hospital Episode Statistics, an administration data warehouse for any hospitalization to English NHS hospital, and defined as any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, heart failure, any coronary revascularization procedure and any cardiovascular-defined death.
Findings: MACE-related 1-year mortality was low at 0.1% (n = 11). Overall, MACE occurred in 268 (2.6%) LT recipients within the first year after LT, of which 125 (1.2%) occurred within the first month. The commonest observed MACE was stroke (n = 129, 1.3%), followed by myocardial infarction (n = 89, 0.9%). After adjustment, MACE within the first year was associated with increased risk for long-term all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.79, p = 0.021). In a competing risk regression model, with non-cardiac death a competing risk, the following were independently associated with increased risk of MACE after LT: increasing age, male sex, diabetes, and higher Charlson co-morbidity score.
Interpretation: MACE and cardiovascular death are uncommon within the first-year post LT in England. However, liver transplant recipients with non-fatal MACE have inferior long-term survival. Further work is warranted to determine the best strategy to mitigate cardiac risk stratification for LT candidates and evidence-based strategies to mitigate cardiovascular risk after LT must be encouraged.
Funding: Nothing to disclose.
背景:据美国报道,主要不良心血管事件(MACE)在肝移植(LT)后早期很常见,但在欧洲队列中发病率并未得到很好的描述。与美国相比,英国肾移植术后MACE发生率较低,因此确定肝移植后是否存在类似的不一致性是很重要的。方法:在这项大型回顾性人群队列研究中,我们研究了2002年4月1日至2023年3月31日在英国进行的所有肝移植手术(n = 10,213)。MACE数据来自医院事件统计(Hospital Episode Statistics),这是英国NHS医院住院的管理数据仓库,定义为以下任何一种:心肌梗死、中风、不稳定型心绞痛、心力衰竭、任何冠状动脉血运重建术和任何心血管疾病定义的死亡。结果:mace相关的1年死亡率较低,为0.1% (n = 11)。总体而言,268例(2.6%)肝移植受者在肝移植后的第一年内发生MACE,其中125例(1.2%)发生在第一个月内。最常见的MACE是脑卒中(n = 129, 1.3%),其次是心肌梗死(n = 89, 0.9%)。调整后,第一年的MACE与长期全因死亡风险增加相关(风险比1.37,95% CI 1.05-1.79, p = 0.021)。在竞争风险回归模型中,非心源性死亡是竞争风险,以下因素与肝移植后MACE风险增加独立相关:年龄增加、男性、糖尿病和较高的Charlson合并症评分。解释:在英格兰,MACE和心血管死亡在肝移植后一年内并不常见。然而,非致死性MACE肝移植受者的长期生存率较低。需要进一步的工作来确定减轻肝移植候选人心脏风险分层的最佳策略,并且必须鼓励采取循证策略来减轻肝移植后心血管风险。资金来源:无需透露。
{"title":"Major adverse cardiovascular events after liver transplantation: a population cohort analysis of English transplant centres.","authors":"Felicity Evison, Suzy Gallier, Fatima Malik, Charlotte Stephens, Charles J Ferro, Jonathan Townend, William Moody, Matthew J Armstrong, Adnan Sharif","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103734","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103734","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are common early after liver transplantation (LT) as reported in the United States, but incidence is not well described in a European cohort. With lower MACE rates reported after kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom versus the United States, it is important to determine if a similar incongruity exists after LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this large retrospective, population cohort study, we studied all LT procedures performed in England between 1st April 2002 and 31st March 2023 (n = 10,213). MACE data was obtained from Hospital Episode Statistics, an administration data warehouse for any hospitalization to English NHS hospital, and defined as any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, heart failure, any coronary revascularization procedure and any cardiovascular-defined death.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>MACE-related 1-year mortality was low at 0.1% (n = 11). Overall, MACE occurred in 268 (2.6%) LT recipients within the first year after LT, of which 125 (1.2%) occurred within the first month. The commonest observed MACE was stroke (n = 129, 1.3%), followed by myocardial infarction (n = 89, 0.9%). After adjustment, MACE within the first year was associated with increased risk for long-term all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.79, p = 0.021). In a competing risk regression model, with non-cardiac death a competing risk, the following were independently associated with increased risk of MACE after LT: increasing age, male sex, diabetes, and higher Charlson co-morbidity score.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>MACE and cardiovascular death are uncommon within the first-year post LT in England. However, liver transplant recipients with non-fatal MACE have inferior long-term survival. Further work is warranted to determine the best strategy to mitigate cardiac risk stratification for LT candidates and evidence-based strategies to mitigate cardiovascular risk after LT must be encouraged.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Nothing to disclose.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103734"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809095/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103708
Feifei Li, Yusha Tao, Chengxin Fan, Yifan Dai, Jamie L Conklin, Joseph D Tucker, Roger Chou, Philippa Easterbrook, Weiming Tang
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) coinfection leads to accelerated progression to liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and increased mortality. Currently, only a small proportion of individuals who are HBsAg positive are tested for anti-HDV antibodies, and among those who test positive, few receive confirmatory HDV RNA testing. Reflex testing, whereby laboratory-based anti-HDV testing is automatically triggered with a positive HBsAg test result in the lab, and also HDV RNA testing in those with a positive anti-HDV result, is one approach to promote the uptake and earlier diagnosis of HDV coinfection. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of a laboratory-based reflex testing strategy for both anti-HDV and HDV RNA on uptake of testing and linkage to care and turnaround times across the care cascade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Global Health (EBSCOhost)) and conference abstracts for relevant studies from database inception through June 2025, with or without a non-reflex comparator arm, and that had data on at least one step in the care cascade (uptake of HDV antibody and HDV RNA testing, linkage to care, and treatment initiation). Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The strength of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023397577).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 3160 studies identified in the search, 28 were eligible for inclusion, of which 9 also had a non-reflex comparison arm. The majority (82.1%) were conducted in high-income countries. Among the 28 studies that used a reflex testing, 97.1% (95% CI: 93.9-98.7) of HBsAg-positive individuals had anti-HDV testing, and 7.2% (95% CI: 5.8-8.9) were anti-HDV positive. Of these, 95.3% (95% CI: 90.1-97.8) had HDV RNA testing, and 43.2% (95% CI: 33.2-53.8) were RNA positive. In the nine studies with a non-reflex comparison arm, reflex testing significantly increased anti-HDV testing uptake (98.0% versus 39.7%; RR 2.55, 95% CI: 1.62-4.05). And in the six studies with a comparator arm that also examined HDV RNA testing, uptake was higher with reflex testing but this was not statistically significant (94.7% versus 79.9%; RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86-1.20). Nine studies reported turnaround times for reflex testing from HBsAg testing to anti-HDV reflex testing, and all were completed within the same day. Four studies also reported a same-day turnaround for HDV RNA testing. Linkage to care was reported in only three of the reflex testing studies, and all 6 HDV RNA-positive individuals were referred for care.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Laboratory-based reflex testing significantly increased the uptake of anti-HDV antibody and HDV RNA testing across diverse populations and settings, with same day turnaround times. The 2024 World Health O
{"title":"Double reflex testing for anti-HDV antibody following an HBsAg-positive test result and HDV RNA in those anti-HDV positive: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Feifei Li, Yusha Tao, Chengxin Fan, Yifan Dai, Jamie L Conklin, Joseph D Tucker, Roger Chou, Philippa Easterbrook, Weiming Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103708","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103708","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) coinfection leads to accelerated progression to liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and increased mortality. Currently, only a small proportion of individuals who are HBsAg positive are tested for anti-HDV antibodies, and among those who test positive, few receive confirmatory HDV RNA testing. Reflex testing, whereby laboratory-based anti-HDV testing is automatically triggered with a positive HBsAg test result in the lab, and also HDV RNA testing in those with a positive anti-HDV result, is one approach to promote the uptake and earlier diagnosis of HDV coinfection. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of a laboratory-based reflex testing strategy for both anti-HDV and HDV RNA on uptake of testing and linkage to care and turnaround times across the care cascade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Global Health (EBSCOhost)) and conference abstracts for relevant studies from database inception through June 2025, with or without a non-reflex comparator arm, and that had data on at least one step in the care cascade (uptake of HDV antibody and HDV RNA testing, linkage to care, and treatment initiation). Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The strength of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023397577).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 3160 studies identified in the search, 28 were eligible for inclusion, of which 9 also had a non-reflex comparison arm. The majority (82.1%) were conducted in high-income countries. Among the 28 studies that used a reflex testing, 97.1% (95% CI: 93.9-98.7) of HBsAg-positive individuals had anti-HDV testing, and 7.2% (95% CI: 5.8-8.9) were anti-HDV positive. Of these, 95.3% (95% CI: 90.1-97.8) had HDV RNA testing, and 43.2% (95% CI: 33.2-53.8) were RNA positive. In the nine studies with a non-reflex comparison arm, reflex testing significantly increased anti-HDV testing uptake (98.0% versus 39.7%; RR 2.55, 95% CI: 1.62-4.05). And in the six studies with a comparator arm that also examined HDV RNA testing, uptake was higher with reflex testing but this was not statistically significant (94.7% versus 79.9%; RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86-1.20). Nine studies reported turnaround times for reflex testing from HBsAg testing to anti-HDV reflex testing, and all were completed within the same day. Four studies also reported a same-day turnaround for HDV RNA testing. Linkage to care was reported in only three of the reflex testing studies, and all 6 HDV RNA-positive individuals were referred for care.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Laboratory-based reflex testing significantly increased the uptake of anti-HDV antibody and HDV RNA testing across diverse populations and settings, with same day turnaround times. The 2024 World Health O","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103708"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103740
Barbara Illowsky Karp, Hannah K Tandon, Ninet Sinaii, Jacqueline V Aredo, Vy T Phan, Noemi Salmeri, Jay P Shah, Melissa A Merideth, Pamela Stratton
Background: Chronic pelvic pain affects one in four women. Botulinum toxin, approved for chronic migraine and cervical dystonia pain, is an emerging treatment for other pain conditions. We evaluated intramuscular pelvic floor botulinum toxin injection in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor muscle spasm, hypothesising that botulinum toxin might reduce both spasm and pain.
Methods: In this a randomised, double-masked, parallel, phase 2 trial, women with pelvic floor spasm and pain despite standard endometriosis-specific and pain treatment were randomily assigned 1:1 to injection of 100 Units onabotulinumtoxinA (15 participants) or saline placebo (14 participants) into pelvic floor muscles. The primary outcome was patient report of benefit or no benefit assessed 1 month after masked injection. Patients could choose an open injection from 1 to 12 months after masked injection. Secondary outcomes (pain rating, pain medication usage, effect duration, and other participant-reported measures) were compared to baseline ratings. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01553201.
Findings: 29 participants were recruited between July 24, 2014 and May 8, 2018. All enrolled women completed the study. At 1 month, significantly more women in the toxin group reported benefit (11 (73%) of 15 vs 4 (29%) of 14; p = 0.027). Women receiving toxin attained a greater percent benefit (p = 0.034) and longer duration (p = 0.023) of pain relief. Those with at least moderate baseline pain had lower pain scores after toxin (p = 0.028). Benefit was present at 1 year in 16 of those requesting open injection (7 of 14 receiving placebo; 9 of 13 receiving toxin). 20 (77%) of 26 patients used less pain medication at 1-year (p < 0.0001), with 12 (92%) of 13 in the BoNT group and eight (62%) of 13 in the placebo group using less medication (p = 0.061). Adverse events were non-serious with no grade 3 or 4 adverse events or deaths, and were similar in both cohorts following masked and open injections.
Interpretation: This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of pelvic floor botulinum toxin injection for women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor spasm.
Funding: The study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Allergan, Inc. provided study drug and independent monitoring funds under a Clinical Trial Agreement with NIH and had no other role in the study.
{"title":"Botulinum toxin for endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain: a randomised, double-masked, parallel, phase 2 trial.","authors":"Barbara Illowsky Karp, Hannah K Tandon, Ninet Sinaii, Jacqueline V Aredo, Vy T Phan, Noemi Salmeri, Jay P Shah, Melissa A Merideth, Pamela Stratton","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103740","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103740","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pelvic pain affects one in four women. Botulinum toxin, approved for chronic migraine and cervical dystonia pain, is an emerging treatment for other pain conditions. We evaluated intramuscular pelvic floor botulinum toxin injection in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor muscle spasm, hypothesising that botulinum toxin might reduce both spasm and pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this a randomised, double-masked, parallel, phase 2 trial, women with pelvic floor spasm and pain despite standard endometriosis-specific and pain treatment were randomily assigned 1:1 to injection of 100 Units onabotulinumtoxinA (15 participants) or saline placebo (14 participants) into pelvic floor muscles. The primary outcome was patient report of benefit or no benefit assessed 1 month after masked injection. Patients could choose an open injection from 1 to 12 months after masked injection. Secondary outcomes (pain rating, pain medication usage, effect duration, and other participant-reported measures) were compared to baseline ratings. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01553201.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>29 participants were recruited between July 24, 2014 and May 8, 2018. All enrolled women completed the study. At 1 month, significantly more women in the toxin group reported benefit (11 (73%) of 15 vs 4 (29%) of 14; p = 0.027). Women receiving toxin attained a greater percent benefit (p = 0.034) and longer duration (p = 0.023) of pain relief. Those with at least moderate baseline pain had lower pain scores after toxin (p = 0.028). Benefit was present at 1 year in 16 of those requesting open injection (7 of 14 receiving placebo; 9 of 13 receiving toxin). 20 (77%) of 26 patients used less pain medication at 1-year (p < 0.0001), with 12 (92%) of 13 in the BoNT group and eight (62%) of 13 in the placebo group using less medication (p = 0.061). Adverse events were non-serious with no grade 3 or 4 adverse events or deaths, and were similar in both cohorts following masked and open injections.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of pelvic floor botulinum toxin injection for women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor spasm.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Allergan, Inc. provided study drug and independent monitoring funds under a Clinical Trial Agreement with NIH and had no other role in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103740"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103711
Cole D Bendor, Aya Bardugo, Avishai M Tsur, Estela Derazne, Itay I Shemesh, Lotmit Bourvine, Dror Dicker, Ben Boursi, Amir Tirosh, Arnon Afek, Ran S Rotem, Gabriel Chodick, Gilad Twig
Background: High body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable cancer risk factor, projected to surpass smoking as the leading preventable risk factor. The impact of weight change from late adolescence to adulthood on cancer risk remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between adolescence-to-adulthood BMI trajectories and obesity-related cancer risk.
Methods: A population-based cohort study of 800,024 people (45.1% women) insured by a large state-mandated health provider. BMI was measured during military pre-recruitment evaluations during 1967-2018 in adolescence and in subsequent clinic visits in adulthood during 1998-2020. Follow-up began one year after an adult BMI measurement until cancer diagnosis, death, transfer to another health provider, or December 16, 2021. BMI trajectories from adolescence to adulthood were classified as lean-to-lean, lean-to-high, high-to-lean, and high-to-high (cutoff: sex-specific and age-specific 85th percentile in adolescence, defined according to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts, and 25 kg/m2 in adulthood). Weight change was also assessed per 5% increments. The primary outcome was obesity-related cancers including esophagus, postmenopausal breast, liver and gallbladder, stomach, pancreas, colon and rectum, kidney, multiple myeloma, thyroid, uterus and ovary. The secondary outcome was obesity-related cancers diagnosed before age 50 years (early-onset cancers). Cox proportional hazards models were applied.
Findings: During 7,610,263 person-years, 6,376 people were diagnosed with obesity-related cancers, at a mean age of 53.3 ± 9.8 years. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.39) for lean-to-high, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.78-1.31) for high-to-lean, and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.34-1.61) for high-to-high groups, compared to the lean-to-lean group. Respective HRs for early-onset obesity-related cancers were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.20-1.47), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.60-1.31), and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.20-1.61). Each 5% weight gain conferred a 3% increased hazard (95% CI, 1.02-1.03), with a similar 3% increase for early-onset cancers (95% CI, 1.02-1.04). Cancer-specific risks included 3% (95% CI, 1.02-1.04) for postmenopausal breast cancer, 3% (95% CI, 1.01-1.04) for colorectal cancer, 4% (95% CI, 1.02-1.05) for thyroid cancer, 5% (95% CI, 1.04-1.07) for kidney cancer, and 8% (95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for uterine cancer. Some cancers, including leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, were not associated with weight gain but were positively associated with high adolescent BMI.
Interpretation: Maintaining a healthy BMI from adolescence to adulthood may reduce obesity-related cancer risk, including early-onset, highlighting the importance of early weight management strategies.
{"title":"Adolescent to adulthood weight trajectories and the risk of obesity-related cancers, overall and early-onset: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Cole D Bendor, Aya Bardugo, Avishai M Tsur, Estela Derazne, Itay I Shemesh, Lotmit Bourvine, Dror Dicker, Ben Boursi, Amir Tirosh, Arnon Afek, Ran S Rotem, Gabriel Chodick, Gilad Twig","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103711","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103711","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable cancer risk factor, projected to surpass smoking as the leading preventable risk factor. The impact of weight change from late adolescence to adulthood on cancer risk remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between adolescence-to-adulthood BMI trajectories and obesity-related cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cohort study of 800,024 people (45.1% women) insured by a large state-mandated health provider. BMI was measured during military pre-recruitment evaluations during 1967-2018 in adolescence and in subsequent clinic visits in adulthood during 1998-2020. Follow-up began one year after an adult BMI measurement until cancer diagnosis, death, transfer to another health provider, or December 16, 2021. BMI trajectories from adolescence to adulthood were classified as lean-to-lean, lean-to-high, high-to-lean, and high-to-high (cutoff: sex-specific and age-specific 85th percentile in adolescence, defined according to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts, and 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in adulthood). Weight change was also assessed per 5% increments. The primary outcome was obesity-related cancers including esophagus, postmenopausal breast, liver and gallbladder, stomach, pancreas, colon and rectum, kidney, multiple myeloma, thyroid, uterus and ovary. The secondary outcome was obesity-related cancers diagnosed before age 50 years (early-onset cancers). Cox proportional hazards models were applied.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During 7,610,263 person-years, 6,376 people were diagnosed with obesity-related cancers, at a mean age of 53.3 ± 9.8 years. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.39) for lean-to-high, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.78-1.31) for high-to-lean, and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.34-1.61) for high-to-high groups, compared to the lean-to-lean group. Respective HRs for early-onset obesity-related cancers were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.20-1.47), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.60-1.31), and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.20-1.61). Each 5% weight gain conferred a 3% increased hazard (95% CI, 1.02-1.03), with a similar 3% increase for early-onset cancers (95% CI, 1.02-1.04). Cancer-specific risks included 3% (95% CI, 1.02-1.04) for postmenopausal breast cancer, 3% (95% CI, 1.01-1.04) for colorectal cancer, 4% (95% CI, 1.02-1.05) for thyroid cancer, 5% (95% CI, 1.04-1.07) for kidney cancer, and 8% (95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for uterine cancer. Some cancers, including leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, were not associated with weight gain but were positively associated with high adolescent BMI.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Maintaining a healthy BMI from adolescence to adulthood may reduce obesity-related cancer risk, including early-onset, highlighting the importance of early weight management strategies.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Novo Nordisk, Israel.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103711"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-03eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103723
Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Alisson M Paredes Naveda, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Marc N Potenza, Peter T Morgan, Gustavo A Angarita
Background: Sleep disturbances are common in individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs), often persisting beyond initial abstinence and hindering recovery. However, the underlying sleep abnormalities warrant further investigation, particularly given mixed findings regarding specific substances.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify sleep-related abnormalities associated with alcohol (AUD), benzodiazepine (BUD), cannabis (CaUD), cocaine (CoUD), methamphetamine (MUD), nicotine (NUD), and opioid (OUD) use disorders. We systematically searched Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until November 2025, following a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42024531160).
Findings: We conducted a systematic review of 43 eligible publications involving approximately 7500 participants, using both objective (eg, polysomnography) and subjective (eg, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) measures. Results showed that total sleep time (TST) was reduced in AUD (-14.32, 95% CI = -16.69 to -11.96; I2 = 0%), NUD (-0.33, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.06; I2 = 37%), and OUD (-38.16, 95% CI = -63.04 to -13.28; I2 = 0%). Slow-wave sleep (SWS) was reduced in AUD (-3.68, 95% CI -4.99 to 2.38; I2 = 73%) and CoUD (-30.69, 95% CI = -47.27 to -14.10; I2 = 90%). Sleep quality, measured by the PSQI, was poorer in AUD (4.89, 95% CI = 3.01 to 6.77; I2 = 98%), CoUD (0.98, 95% CI = 0.04-1.93; I2 = 0%) and NUD (2.64, 95% CI = 0.41-4.88; I2 = 96%). Results for CaUD could not be meta-analyzed due to scarcity of data. No study met criteria to be included for BUD or MUD.
Interpretation: These findings suggest specific relationships between specific addictive substances and sleep, highlight areas of convergence in these relationships, and indicate instances in which the same drug is related with both objective and subjective alterations. Further research is needed to explore further, at a meta-analytical level, relationships between sleep and specific substances.
Funding: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
背景:睡眠障碍在物质使用障碍(sud)患者中很常见,通常持续超过最初的戒断并阻碍康复。然而,潜在的睡眠异常值得进一步调查,特别是考虑到特定物质的混合发现。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定与酒精(AUD)、苯二氮卓类药物(BUD)、大麻(CaUD)、可卡因(CoUD)、甲基苯丙胺(MUD)、尼古丁(NUD)和阿片类药物(OUD)使用障碍相关的睡眠相关异常。我们系统地检索了Embase、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,直到2025年11月,遵循预先注册的协议(PROSPERO: CRD42024531160)。研究结果:我们采用客观(如多导睡眠图)和主观(如匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI])测量方法,对43篇符合条件的出版物进行了系统评价,涉及约7500名参与者。结果显示,总睡眠时间(TST)在AUD (-14.32, 95% CI = -16.69至-11.96;I2 = 0%)、NUD (-0.33, 95% CI = -0.59至-0.06;I2 = 37%)和OUD (-38.16, 95% CI = -63.04至-13.28;I2 = 0%)组均有所减少。慢波睡眠(SWS)在AUD (-3.68, 95% CI = -4.99至2.38;I2 = 73%)和CoUD (-30.69, 95% CI = -47.27至-14.10;I2 = 90%)中减少。由PSQI测量的睡眠质量在AUD (4.89, 95% CI = 3.01 - 6.77; I2 = 98%)、CoUD (0.98, 95% CI = 0.04-1.93; I2 = 0%)和NUD (2.64, 95% CI = 0.41-4.88; I2 = 96%)组较差。由于缺乏数据,不能对冠心病的结果进行meta分析。没有研究符合budd或MUD的标准。解释:这些发现表明了特定成瘾物质与睡眠之间的特定关系,突出了这些关系中的趋同领域,并指出了同一种药物与客观和主观改变相关的实例。需要进一步的研究,在元分析水平上进一步探索睡眠和特定物质之间的关系。资助:国家药物滥用研究所。
{"title":"Sleep alterations in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Alisson M Paredes Naveda, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Marc N Potenza, Peter T Morgan, Gustavo A Angarita","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103723","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disturbances are common in individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs), often persisting beyond initial abstinence and hindering recovery. However, the underlying sleep abnormalities warrant further investigation, particularly given mixed findings regarding specific substances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify sleep-related abnormalities associated with alcohol (AUD), benzodiazepine (BUD), cannabis (CaUD), cocaine (CoUD), methamphetamine (MUD), nicotine (NUD), and opioid (OUD) use disorders. We systematically searched Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until November 2025, following a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42024531160).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of 43 eligible publications involving approximately 7500 participants, using both objective (eg, polysomnography) and subjective (eg, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) measures. Results showed that total sleep time (TST) was reduced in AUD (-14.32, 95% CI = -16.69 to -11.96; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), NUD (-0.33, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.06; I<sup>2</sup> = 37%), and OUD (-38.16, 95% CI = -63.04 to -13.28; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Slow-wave sleep (SWS) was reduced in AUD (-3.68, 95% CI -4.99 to 2.38; I<sup>2</sup> = 73%) and CoUD (-30.69, 95% CI = -47.27 to -14.10; I<sup>2</sup> = 90%). Sleep quality, measured by the PSQI, was poorer in AUD (4.89, 95% CI = 3.01 to 6.77; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%), CoUD (0.98, 95% CI = 0.04-1.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and NUD (2.64, 95% CI = 0.41-4.88; I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). Results for CaUD could not be meta-analyzed due to scarcity of data. No study met criteria to be included for BUD or MUD.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These findings suggest specific relationships between specific addictive substances and sleep, highlight areas of convergence in these relationships, and indicate instances in which the same drug is related with both objective and subjective alterations. Further research is needed to explore further, at a meta-analytical level, relationships between sleep and specific substances.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute on Drug Abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103723"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805338/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-03eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103735
Brian Tangara, Hellen C Barsosio, Tegwen Marlais, Jean Moise T Kabore, Alfred B Tiono, Kephas Otieno, Miriam Wanjiku, Morine Achieng, Eric D Onyango, Everlyne D Ondieki, Henry Aura, Telesphorus Odawo, David J Allen, Luke Hannan, Kevin Ka Tetteh, Issiaka Soulama, Alphonse Ouedraogo, Samuel S Serme, Ben I Soulama, Aissata Barry, Emilie S Badoum, Julian Matthewman, Helena Brazal-Monzó, Jennifer Canizales, Anna Drabko, William Wu, Simon Kariuki, Maia Lesosky, Sodiomon B Sirima, Chris Drakeley, Feiko O Ter Kuile
<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unknown whether the choice of malaria treatment for uncomplicated malaria affects coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load, or duration of viral shedding. Several antimalarials exhibit antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 <i>in vitro</i> and have been suggested as potential therapeutic candidates for COVID-19, particularly pyronaridine-artesunate (PA), despite disappointing clinical results with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an open-label randomised trial comparing standard 3-day treatment with PA and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in newly diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients aged ≥6 months with rapid diagnostic test or microscopy-confirmed non-severe malaria in Kenya and Burkina Faso. SARS-CoV-2 was assessed by RT-PCR on days 3, 7, 14, and 28, and symptom resolution was assessed daily for 14 days using FLU-PRO Plus. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7. Secondary endpoints included SARS-CoV-2 clearance by days 14, 21, and 28, time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days, median viral load on day 7, and time to symptom resolution. Complete case analysis was conducted using log-binomial regression for binary outcomes, Cox-regression for time-to-event outcomes, and negative binomial regression for count outcomes, all adjusted for disease severity and viral load at enrolment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695197.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From January 2021 to January 2022, 143 participants were randomised (PA = 69, AL = 74, intention-to-treat [ITT] population), including 117 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed (PA = 58, AL = 59, modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population) and 26 with rapid-antigen test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 19 years (interquartile range [IQR] 13-38), 66% were aged ≥15 years. Baseline characteristics were comparable. SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7 (primary endpoint) was 41% (22/54) with PA versus 58% (33/57) with AL (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.35, p = 0.37); by day-14: PA = 80% (44/55) versus AL = 96% (55/57) (aRR = 0.86, 0.58-1.29, p = 0.47). Median (IQR) viral load on day 7 was higher with PA (855 [30-2883] versus AL:81 [12-209] copies/mL, p = 0.023). Time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days was slower with PA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.55, 0.37-0.83, p = 0.004). Time to symptom clearance between treatments was similar (aHR = 1.01, 0.91-1.13, p = 0.79). Parasitological cure rates by day 42 were PA = 100% and AL = 99%. Five serious adverse events occurred (PA = 2, AL = 3) in three participants (PA = 1, AL = 2), including three hospitalisations (PA = 1, AL = 2), resulting in two deaths, both from respiratory failure (PA = 1, AL = 1). No serious adverse events (SAEs) were cons
背景:目前尚不清楚非复杂性疟疾的疟疾治疗选择是否会影响冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)的严重程度、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)的病毒载量或病毒脱落的持续时间。几种抗疟药在体外表现出对SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒活性,并被认为是COVID-19的潜在治疗候选药物,特别是吡咯嘧啶-青蒿琥酯(PA),尽管氯喹和羟氯喹的临床结果令人失望。方法:我们进行了一项开放标签随机试验,比较了在肯尼亚和布基纳法索新诊断的年龄≥6个月的SARS-CoV-2感染快速诊断试验或显微镜下确诊的非严重疟疾患者中,PA和蒿甲醚-氨苯三嗪(AL)的标准3天治疗。在第3、7、14和28天通过RT-PCR评估SARS-CoV-2,并在14天内每天使用FLU-PRO Plus评估症状消退情况。主要终点是受试者在第7天清除SARS-CoV-2的比例。次要终点包括第14、21和28天的SARS-CoV-2清除,到28天内SARS-CoV-2清除的时间,第7天的中位病毒载量,以及到症状缓解的时间。对二元结果采用对数二项回归,对事件发生时间结果采用cox回归,对计数结果采用负二项回归进行完整的病例分析,所有分析均根据入组时的疾病严重程度和病毒载量进行调整。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT04695197。研究结果:从2021年1月至2022年1月,143名受试者被随机分组(PA = 69, AL = 74,意向治疗[ITT]人群),其中117人经逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确诊(PA = 58, AL = 59,意向治疗[mITT]人群),26人经快速抗原检测确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染。中位年龄为19岁(四分位间距[IQR] 13-38), 66%年龄≥15岁。基线特征具有可比性。第7天(主要终点),PA组的SARS-CoV-2清除率为41% (22/54),AL组为58%(33/57)(校正风险比[aRR] = 0.78, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.45-1.35, p = 0.37);第14天:PA = 80% (44/55), AL = 96% (55/57) (aRR = 0.86, 0.58-1.29, p = 0.47)。第7天PA组的中位病毒载量(IQR)较高(855 [30-2883],AL组为81[12-209]拷贝/mL, p = 0.023)。PA患者在28天内清除SARS-CoV-2的时间较慢(校正风险比[aHR]: 0.55, 0.37-0.83, p = 0.004)。两组治疗至症状消除的时间相似(aHR = 1.01, 0.91-1.13, p = 0.79)。第42天的寄生虫治愈率PA = 100%, AL = 99%。3名参与者(PA = 1, AL = 2)发生了5次严重不良事件(PA = 2, AL = 3),包括3次住院(PA = 1, AL = 2),导致2例死亡,均因呼吸衰竭(PA = 1, AL = 1)。没有严重不良事件(SAEs)被认为与治疗相关。解释:吡啶-青蒿琥酯在COVID-19合并疟疾患者中的病毒清除速度比用蒿甲醚-氨苯曲明标准治疗慢,但症状缓解相似。这两种治疗方法都是非常有效的抗疟药物,应继续考虑将其作为轻中度COVID-19患者无并发症疟疾的一线或二线治疗选择。资助:盖茨基金会。
{"title":"Artemether-lumefantrine versus pyronaridine-artesunate for the treatment of malaria in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 in Kenya and Burkina Faso: a randomised open-label trial (MALCOV).","authors":"Brian Tangara, Hellen C Barsosio, Tegwen Marlais, Jean Moise T Kabore, Alfred B Tiono, Kephas Otieno, Miriam Wanjiku, Morine Achieng, Eric D Onyango, Everlyne D Ondieki, Henry Aura, Telesphorus Odawo, David J Allen, Luke Hannan, Kevin Ka Tetteh, Issiaka Soulama, Alphonse Ouedraogo, Samuel S Serme, Ben I Soulama, Aissata Barry, Emilie S Badoum, Julian Matthewman, Helena Brazal-Monzó, Jennifer Canizales, Anna Drabko, William Wu, Simon Kariuki, Maia Lesosky, Sodiomon B Sirima, Chris Drakeley, Feiko O Ter Kuile","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103735","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103735","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unknown whether the choice of malaria treatment for uncomplicated malaria affects coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load, or duration of viral shedding. Several antimalarials exhibit antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 <i>in vitro</i> and have been suggested as potential therapeutic candidates for COVID-19, particularly pyronaridine-artesunate (PA), despite disappointing clinical results with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an open-label randomised trial comparing standard 3-day treatment with PA and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in newly diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients aged ≥6 months with rapid diagnostic test or microscopy-confirmed non-severe malaria in Kenya and Burkina Faso. SARS-CoV-2 was assessed by RT-PCR on days 3, 7, 14, and 28, and symptom resolution was assessed daily for 14 days using FLU-PRO Plus. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7. Secondary endpoints included SARS-CoV-2 clearance by days 14, 21, and 28, time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days, median viral load on day 7, and time to symptom resolution. Complete case analysis was conducted using log-binomial regression for binary outcomes, Cox-regression for time-to-event outcomes, and negative binomial regression for count outcomes, all adjusted for disease severity and viral load at enrolment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695197.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From January 2021 to January 2022, 143 participants were randomised (PA = 69, AL = 74, intention-to-treat [ITT] population), including 117 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed (PA = 58, AL = 59, modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population) and 26 with rapid-antigen test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 19 years (interquartile range [IQR] 13-38), 66% were aged ≥15 years. Baseline characteristics were comparable. SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7 (primary endpoint) was 41% (22/54) with PA versus 58% (33/57) with AL (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.35, p = 0.37); by day-14: PA = 80% (44/55) versus AL = 96% (55/57) (aRR = 0.86, 0.58-1.29, p = 0.47). Median (IQR) viral load on day 7 was higher with PA (855 [30-2883] versus AL:81 [12-209] copies/mL, p = 0.023). Time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days was slower with PA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.55, 0.37-0.83, p = 0.004). Time to symptom clearance between treatments was similar (aHR = 1.01, 0.91-1.13, p = 0.79). Parasitological cure rates by day 42 were PA = 100% and AL = 99%. Five serious adverse events occurred (PA = 2, AL = 3) in three participants (PA = 1, AL = 2), including three hospitalisations (PA = 1, AL = 2), resulting in two deaths, both from respiratory failure (PA = 1, AL = 1). No serious adverse events (SAEs) were cons","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103735"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}