首页 > 最新文献

EClinicalMedicine最新文献

英文 中文
Development and validation of a generalisable machine learning algorithm for identifying interstitial lung disease cohorts: a retrospective cohort study. 开发和验证用于识别间质性肺病队列的通用机器学习算法:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-21 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103790
Erica Farrand, Augustine Chung, Jisha Joshua, Huawei Dong, Hunter Mills, Albert Lee, Martin Ieong, Lakshmi Radhakrishnan, Oksana Gologorskaya, Atul Butte

Background: Large electronic databases are powerful tools for studying rare diseases, however accurate Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) classification remains challenging. Rule-based approaches rely heavily on diagnostic codes-unreliable markers of ILD. We aimed to develop and externally validate an ILD classification algorithm that robustly identifies prevalent cases using routinely captured electronic health record (EHR) data.

Methods: In this retrospective model development and validation study, we used EHR data from the UC Health Data Warehouse, a multi-institutional dataset from six academic centres in California, USA (2012-2024). Data from individuals ≥18 years with ≥ five encounters were included. We developed the Universal ILD Classifier, a machine learning model developed on standardised EHR data elements from UC San Francisco (January 1, 1981-January 6, 2025). The algorithm was converted to an EHR-agnostic common data model, to enable external validation across three independent sites (UC Irvine, Los Angeles, and San Diego; January 1, 2012-April 30, 2025). Features included diagnostic and procedure codes, laboratory results, medications, demographics, and utilisation metrics. The main outcome was algorithm performance assessed by positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, F1-score, and receiver operative characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC). Performance was compared with two widely used rule-based classification methods.

Findings: The Universal ILD Classifier, developed on data from 203,976 patients and validated on data at three independent sites (N = 250 per site), demonstrated robust generalisability, achieving average PPV = 0.67 (0.58-0.72), sensitivity = 0.97 (0.94-0.99), F1-score = 0.79 (0.72-0.84), and ROC-AUC = 0.96 (0.94-0.97). It consistently outperformed both rule-based methods, which had PPVs = 0.55 (0.50-0.59) and 0.67 (0.61-0.73), sensitivities = 0.98 (0.96-0.99) and 0.59 (0.53-0.64), F1-scores = 0.71 (0.66-0.74) and 0.63 (0.57-0.68), and ROC-AUCs = 0.80 (0.78-0.82) and 0.73 (0.70-0.76) respectively.

Interpretation: Accurate patient identification is essential for epidemiological studies and ILD clinical trials. The Universal ILD Classifier leverages commonly available EHR data and outperforms rule-based approaches, supporting more reliable large-scale ILD research and offering a foundation for further refinement with additional features. Limitations inherent to retrospective EHR analyses, including misclassification, residual confounding, and limited generalisability, may have influenced effect estimates and should be considered when interpreting these findings.

Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI).

背景:大型电子数据库是研究罕见疾病的有力工具,然而间质性肺疾病(ILD)的准确分类仍然具有挑战性。基于规则的方法严重依赖于诊断代码——不可靠的ILD标记。我们的目标是开发和外部验证ILD分类算法,该算法使用常规捕获的电子健康记录(EHR)数据可靠地识别流行病例。方法:在这项回顾性模型开发和验证研究中,我们使用了来自加州大学健康数据仓库的电子病历数据,这是一个来自美国加利福尼亚州六个学术中心的多机构数据集(2012-2024)。数据来自≥18岁且≥5次接触的个体。我们开发了通用ILD分类器,这是一种基于加州大学旧金山分校(1981年1月1日至2025年1月6日)标准化EHR数据元素开发的机器学习模型。该算法被转换为ehr不可知的公共数据模型,以便在三个独立的站点(加州大学欧文分校、洛杉矶分校和圣地亚哥分校;2012年1月1日- 2025年4月30日)进行外部验证。特征包括诊断和程序代码、实验室结果、药物、人口统计数据和利用指标。主要结果是通过阳性预测值(PPV)、敏感性、f1评分和患者手术特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)评估算法性能。比较了两种常用的基于规则的分类方法的性能。结果:通用ILD分类器基于203,976例患者的数据开发,并在三个独立站点(每个站点N = 250)的数据上进行验证,显示出强大的通用性,平均PPV = 0.67(0.58-0.72),灵敏度= 0.97 (0.94-0.99),f1评分= 0.79 (0.72-0.84),ROC-AUC = 0.96(0.94-0.97)。两种方法的ppv分别为0.55(0.50-0.59)和0.67(0.61-0.73),灵敏度分别为0.98(0.96-0.99)和0.59 (0.53-0.64),f1评分分别为0.71(0.66-0.74)和0.63 (0.57-0.68),roc - auc分别为0.80(0.78-0.82)和0.73(0.70-0.76)。解释:准确的患者识别对流行病学研究和ILD临床试验至关重要。通用ILD分类器利用常用的EHR数据,优于基于规则的方法,支持更可靠的大规模ILD研究,并为进一步改进附加功能提供基础。回顾性电子病历分析固有的局限性,包括错误分类、残留混淆和有限的通用性,可能会影响效果估计,在解释这些发现时应予以考虑。融资:勃林格殷格翰制药公司(BIPI)。
{"title":"Development and validation of a generalisable machine learning algorithm for identifying interstitial lung disease cohorts: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Erica Farrand, Augustine Chung, Jisha Joshua, Huawei Dong, Hunter Mills, Albert Lee, Martin Ieong, Lakshmi Radhakrishnan, Oksana Gologorskaya, Atul Butte","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large electronic databases are powerful tools for studying rare diseases, however accurate Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) classification remains challenging. Rule-based approaches rely heavily on diagnostic codes-unreliable markers of ILD. We aimed to develop and externally validate an ILD classification algorithm that robustly identifies prevalent cases using routinely captured electronic health record (EHR) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective model development and validation study, we used EHR data from the UC Health Data Warehouse, a multi-institutional dataset from six academic centres in California, USA (2012-2024). Data from individuals ≥18 years with ≥ five encounters were included. We developed the Universal ILD Classifier, a machine learning model developed on standardised EHR data elements from UC San Francisco (January 1, 1981-January 6, 2025). The algorithm was converted to an EHR-agnostic common data model, to enable external validation across three independent sites (UC Irvine, Los Angeles, and San Diego; January 1, 2012-April 30, 2025). Features included diagnostic and procedure codes, laboratory results, medications, demographics, and utilisation metrics. The main outcome was algorithm performance assessed by positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, F1-score, and receiver operative characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC). Performance was compared with two widely used rule-based classification methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The Universal ILD Classifier, developed on data from 203,976 patients and validated on data at three independent sites (N = 250 per site), demonstrated robust generalisability, achieving average PPV = 0.67 (0.58-0.72), sensitivity = 0.97 (0.94-0.99), F1-score = 0.79 (0.72-0.84), and ROC-AUC = 0.96 (0.94-0.97). It consistently outperformed both rule-based methods, which had PPVs = 0.55 (0.50-0.59) and 0.67 (0.61-0.73), sensitivities = 0.98 (0.96-0.99) and 0.59 (0.53-0.64), F1-scores = 0.71 (0.66-0.74) and 0.63 (0.57-0.68), and ROC-AUCs = 0.80 (0.78-0.82) and 0.73 (0.70-0.76) respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Accurate patient identification is essential for epidemiological studies and ILD clinical trials. The Universal ILD Classifier leverages commonly available EHR data and outperforms rule-based approaches, supporting more reliable large-scale ILD research and offering a foundation for further refinement with additional features. Limitations inherent to retrospective EHR analyses, including misclassification, residual confounding, and limited generalisability, may have influenced effect estimates and should be considered when interpreting these findings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103790"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12945527/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dapiglutide, a dual GLP-1 and GLP-2 receptor agonist, for obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group, proof-of-concept trial. 达格鲁肽,GLP-1和GLP-2受体双激动剂,用于肥胖:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照平行组,概念验证试验。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-21 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103801
Casper K Nielsen, Thorir G Pálsson, Julie L Forman, Michaela Lukacova, Benjamin A H Jensen, David S Mathiesen, Anders Englund, Ida M Gether, Nicklas J Johansen, Miriam G Pedersen, Bolette Hartmann, Jens J Holst, Filip K Knop, Asger B Lund

Background: Dapiglutide, a dual glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and GLP-2 receptor agonist, is under clinical development for bodyweight reduction in obesity, capitalising on GLP-1 receptor-mediated food intake-reducing effect leading to bodyweight loss and GLP-2 receptor-mediated improvement of gut barrier function and anti-inflammatory properties.

Methods: In this 12-week, investigator-initiated, phase IIa, proof-of-concept, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Denmark, adults (18-75 years) with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were randomised to once-weekly subcutaneous dapiglutide (4 or 6 mg) or placebo (1:1:1; stratified by sex) without concurrent lifestyle intervention. Exclusion criteria included HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol and recent ≥5% bodyweight change. The primary endpoint was percentage bodyweight change from baseline to week 12. The effects of 6 mg and 4 mg dapiglutide were tested hierarchically against first placebo, next each other in efficacy analyses with missing data replaced by standard multiple imputation. The study is registered with EU (trial no. 2022-501649-54-00) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05788601).

Findings: Between April 27, 2023, and April 24, 2024, 54 adults living with obesity (63% women; mean bodyweight 101·3 kg; mean BMI 35·2 kg/m2) were randomised. In the primary efficacy analysis, 6 mg dapiglutide led to a mean bodyweight change of -2·1% [95% CI -4·3 to 0·2; p = 0·076] compared to placebo. Dapiglutide appeared safe and well-tolerated, with common adverse events including reduced appetite and nausea. No participants discontinued due to drug-induced adverse events, and in general, dropout rates were low, i.e. 0% (placebo), 11% (4 mg), and 6% (6 mg).

Interpretation: Dapiglutide (4 mg or 6 mg) for 12 weeks did not result in a statistically significant difference in bodyweight change compared with placebo in persons with obesity. The safety profile was favourable, and the findings support further investigation of higher doses in larger and longer studies to evaluate the weight-lowering potential of dapiglutide.

Funding: Unrestricted grant from Zealand Pharma.

背景:达格鲁肽(Dapiglutide)是一种双胰高血糖素样肽(GLP)-1和GLP-2受体激动剂,正在临床开发中,用于肥胖患者的体重减轻,利用GLP-1受体介导的食物摄入减少作用,导致体重减轻,GLP-2受体介导的肠道屏障功能和抗炎特性的改善。方法:在丹麦进行的这项为期12周、由研究者发起、概念验证、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,肥胖(BMI≥30 kg/m2)的成年人(18-75岁)被随机分配到每周一次皮下注射达格鲁肽(4或6 mg)或安慰剂(1:1:1;按性别分层),没有同时进行生活方式干预。排除标准包括HbA1c≥48 mmol/mol和近期体重变化≥5%。主要终点是从基线到第12周的体重变化百分比。6mg和4mg达格鲁肽与第一种安慰剂的疗效进行分级测试,然后在疗效分析中相互测试,缺失的数据用标准的多重输入替代。本研究已在EU注册(试验号:2022-501649-54-00)和ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05788601)。研究结果:在2023年4月27日至2024年4月24日期间,54名肥胖成年人(63%为女性,平均体重101·3 kg,平均BMI 35·2 kg/m2)被随机分组。在初步疗效分析中,6 mg达格鲁肽导致平均体重变化-2·1% [95% CI -4·3至0·2;P = 0·076]。达格鲁肽安全且耐受性良好,常见的不良事件包括食欲下降和恶心。没有参与者因药物引起的不良事件而停药,总体而言,停药率很低,分别为0%(安慰剂组)、11% (4mg组)和6% (6mg组)。解释:与安慰剂相比,达格鲁肽(4mg或6mg)治疗12周对肥胖患者的体重变化没有统计学上的显著差异。安全性是有利的,研究结果支持在更大、更长的研究中进行更高剂量的研究,以评估达格鲁肽的减肥潜力。资助:来自Zealand Pharma的无限制资助。
{"title":"Dapiglutide, a dual GLP-1 and GLP-2 receptor agonist, for obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group, proof-of-concept trial.","authors":"Casper K Nielsen, Thorir G Pálsson, Julie L Forman, Michaela Lukacova, Benjamin A H Jensen, David S Mathiesen, Anders Englund, Ida M Gether, Nicklas J Johansen, Miriam G Pedersen, Bolette Hartmann, Jens J Holst, Filip K Knop, Asger B Lund","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103801","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dapiglutide, a dual glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and GLP-2 receptor agonist, is under clinical development for bodyweight reduction in obesity, capitalising on GLP-1 receptor-mediated food intake-reducing effect leading to bodyweight loss and GLP-2 receptor-mediated improvement of gut barrier function and anti-inflammatory properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 12-week, investigator-initiated, phase IIa, proof-of-concept, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Denmark, adults (18-75 years) with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomised to once-weekly subcutaneous dapiglutide (4 or 6 mg) or placebo (1:1:1; stratified by sex) without concurrent lifestyle intervention. Exclusion criteria included HbA<sub>1c</sub> ≥48 mmol/mol and recent ≥5% bodyweight change. The primary endpoint was percentage bodyweight change from baseline to week 12. The effects of 6 mg and 4 mg dapiglutide were tested hierarchically against first placebo, next each other in efficacy analyses with missing data replaced by standard multiple imputation. The study is registered with EU (trial no. 2022-501649-54-00) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05788601).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between April 27, 2023, and April 24, 2024, 54 adults living with obesity (63% women; mean bodyweight 101·3 kg; mean BMI 35·2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomised. In the primary efficacy analysis, 6 mg dapiglutide led to a mean bodyweight change of -2·1% [95% CI -4·3 to 0·2; p = 0·076] compared to placebo. Dapiglutide appeared safe and well-tolerated, with common adverse events including reduced appetite and nausea. No participants discontinued due to drug-induced adverse events, and in general, dropout rates were low, i.e. 0% (placebo), 11% (4 mg), and 6% (6 mg).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Dapiglutide (4 mg or 6 mg) for 12 weeks did not result in a statistically significant difference in bodyweight change compared with placebo in persons with obesity. The safety profile was favourable, and the findings support further investigation of higher doses in larger and longer studies to evaluate the weight-lowering potential of dapiglutide.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Unrestricted grant from Zealand Pharma.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103801"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12945526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exempting axillary staging surgery in breast cancer using multimodal ultrasound imaging and radiomics of sentinel lymph nodes. 使用多模态超声成像和前哨淋巴结放射组学免除乳腺癌腋窝分期手术。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-16 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103782
Dayan Huang, Yilei Shi, Wenbin Cao, Liting Feng, Yunhao Luo, Xing Zhao, Jingliang Hu, Xu Cao, Lichao Mou, Xiaoxiang Zhu, Jie Chen, Cheng Guan, Hongye Gu, Jiaqian He, Li Chen, Yijie Chen, Ruoxia Shen, Jing Luo, Jun Luo
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure for axillary staging in early-stage breast cancer patients, however, it remains an invasive procedure. The aim of this study is to construct a multicenter, multimodal predictive model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and grayscale ultrasound (GSUS) imaging of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients. The model seeks to preoperatively assess the risk of SLN metastasis in a non-invasive manner, thereby enabling the exemption of unnecessary SLNB for eligible patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, multimodal ultrasound radiomics study, eligible breast cancer patients from three medical centers, respectively, the Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Yunnan Provincial Cancer Hospital, and Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital in China, were consecutively enrolled between January 2019 to February 2024, and between February 2024 to July 2024. The enrolled patients had pathologically confirmed breast cancer and underwent CEUS and GSUS imaging of their SLNs. The patients were divided into the following groups: training cohort (n = 763), validation cohort (n = 132), internal independent test cohort (n = 298), prospective internal test cohort 1 (n = 75), prospective external test cohort 2 (n = 51), and prospective external test cohort 3 (n = 55). A deep dual-modal fusion network (DDFN) model was developed to preoperatively predict lymph node metastasis by integrating features from both CEUS and GSUS images of the SLNs. The predictive performance of different models across the test cohorts was evaluated by negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The DDFN demonstrated superior performance for SLN metastasis prediction compared to single-modality models. In the internal test cohort (n = 298), the DDFN model achieved a NPV of 0.973 (95% CI: 0.956-0.987), which was significantly higher than those of the GSUS model (NPV = 0.941, P = 0.032) and the CEUS model (NPV = 0.958, P = 0.041). The DDFN model also attained the highest AUC of 0.912, significantly outperforming the GSUS model (AUC = 0.782, P = 0.0046) and the CEUS model (AUC = 0.890, P = 0.039). Furthermore, the DDFN model exhibited excellent specificity (0.987), indicating its robustness in accurately distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic SLNs. This strong performance was consistently maintained across three prospective multicenter test cohorts. The DDFN model yielded NPVs exceeding 0.9 in all cohorts (cohort 1: 0.933; cohort 2: 0.917; cohort 3: 0.909), which were statistically superior to the single-modality models in most comparisons. The AUC values of the DDFN model in the prospective cohorts (0.893, 0.866, and 0.862, respectively) remained high and generally surpassed those of the single-modality approaches.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The DDFN model, integrating C
背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是早期乳腺癌患者腋窝分期的标准程序,然而,它仍然是一种侵入性程序。本研究旨在建立基于超声造影(CEUS)和灰度超声(GSUS)对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(sln)成像的多中心、多模式预测模型。该模型旨在术前以非侵入性方式评估SLN转移的风险,从而使符合条件的患者免除不必要的SLNB。方法:在这项多中心、多模式超声放射组学研究中,在2019年1月至2024年2月和2024年2月至2024年7月期间,分别从中国四川省人民医院、云南省肿瘤医院和福建省肿瘤医院三个医疗中心连续入组符合条件的乳腺癌患者。入选的患者病理证实为乳腺癌,并对其sln进行了超声造影和GSUS成像。患者分为以下组:训练组(n = 763)、验证组(n = 132)、内部独立测试组(n = 298)、前瞻性内部测试组1 (n = 75)、前瞻性外部测试组2 (n = 51)和前瞻性外部测试组3 (n = 55)。建立了一个深度双峰融合网络(DDFN)模型,通过整合sln的CEUS和GSUS图像特征来预测术前淋巴结转移。通过阴性预测值(NPV)、特异性、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和准确性来评估不同模型在测试队列中的预测性能。结果:与单模态模型相比,dddn在预测SLN转移方面表现出优越的性能。在内测队列(n = 298)中,DDFN模型的NPV为0.973 (95% CI: 0.956 ~ 0.987),显著高于GSUS模型(NPV = 0.941, P = 0.032)和CEUS模型(NPV = 0.958, P = 0.041)。DDFN模型的AUC最高,为0.912,显著优于GSUS模型(AUC = 0.782, P = 0.0046)和CEUS模型(AUC = 0.890, P = 0.039)。此外,DDFN模型具有优异的特异性(0.987),表明其在准确区分转移性和非转移性sln方面的稳健性。在三个前瞻性多中心试验队列中,这种强劲的表现始终保持不变。DDFN模型在所有队列(队列1:0.933;队列2:0.917;队列3:0.909)的npv均超过0.9,在大多数比较中均优于单模态模型。在前瞻性队列中,dddn模型的AUC值(分别为0.893、0.866和0.862)仍然很高,普遍超过了单模态方法。解释:DDFN模型整合了CEUS和GSUS图像,可以用于sln的术前评估。该方法有望在术前评估腋窝淋巴结(aln),识别无SLN转移的患者,并免除不必要的腋窝分期手术。基金资助:本研究受四川省科技厅重点研发项目[2023YFS0263]资助。
{"title":"Exempting axillary staging surgery in breast cancer using multimodal ultrasound imaging and radiomics of sentinel lymph nodes.","authors":"Dayan Huang, Yilei Shi, Wenbin Cao, Liting Feng, Yunhao Luo, Xing Zhao, Jingliang Hu, Xu Cao, Lichao Mou, Xiaoxiang Zhu, Jie Chen, Cheng Guan, Hongye Gu, Jiaqian He, Li Chen, Yijie Chen, Ruoxia Shen, Jing Luo, Jun Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103782","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103782","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure for axillary staging in early-stage breast cancer patients, however, it remains an invasive procedure. The aim of this study is to construct a multicenter, multimodal predictive model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and grayscale ultrasound (GSUS) imaging of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients. The model seeks to preoperatively assess the risk of SLN metastasis in a non-invasive manner, thereby enabling the exemption of unnecessary SLNB for eligible patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In this multicenter, multimodal ultrasound radiomics study, eligible breast cancer patients from three medical centers, respectively, the Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Yunnan Provincial Cancer Hospital, and Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital in China, were consecutively enrolled between January 2019 to February 2024, and between February 2024 to July 2024. The enrolled patients had pathologically confirmed breast cancer and underwent CEUS and GSUS imaging of their SLNs. The patients were divided into the following groups: training cohort (n = 763), validation cohort (n = 132), internal independent test cohort (n = 298), prospective internal test cohort 1 (n = 75), prospective external test cohort 2 (n = 51), and prospective external test cohort 3 (n = 55). A deep dual-modal fusion network (DDFN) model was developed to preoperatively predict lymph node metastasis by integrating features from both CEUS and GSUS images of the SLNs. The predictive performance of different models across the test cohorts was evaluated by negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and accuracy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The DDFN demonstrated superior performance for SLN metastasis prediction compared to single-modality models. In the internal test cohort (n = 298), the DDFN model achieved a NPV of 0.973 (95% CI: 0.956-0.987), which was significantly higher than those of the GSUS model (NPV = 0.941, P = 0.032) and the CEUS model (NPV = 0.958, P = 0.041). The DDFN model also attained the highest AUC of 0.912, significantly outperforming the GSUS model (AUC = 0.782, P = 0.0046) and the CEUS model (AUC = 0.890, P = 0.039). Furthermore, the DDFN model exhibited excellent specificity (0.987), indicating its robustness in accurately distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic SLNs. This strong performance was consistently maintained across three prospective multicenter test cohorts. The DDFN model yielded NPVs exceeding 0.9 in all cohorts (cohort 1: 0.933; cohort 2: 0.917; cohort 3: 0.909), which were statistically superior to the single-modality models in most comparisons. The AUC values of the DDFN model in the prospective cohorts (0.893, 0.866, and 0.862, respectively) remained high and generally surpassed those of the single-modality approaches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/strong&gt;The DDFN model, integrating C","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103782"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12930030/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147303534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global inequities in organ transplantation, 2008-2023: trends, unmet need, and policy implications. 2008-2023年全球器官移植不公平:趋势、未满足需求和政策影响。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103788
Peng Hao, Qing He, Haifeng Li, Xiaohong Qiu, Zhonghua Klaus Chen

Background: Solid organ transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage organ failure, yet access is highly inequitable worldwide. Comparable long-term evidence across organs, regions, and development settings remains limited.

Methods: Data from the WHO Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (GODT) for six solid organs (2008-2023) were analyzed. Per-million population (PMP) rates and the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) were calculated; disparities by Human Development Index (HDI), WHO regions, and Global Burden of Disease 2021 (GBD 2021) regions were quantified using the slope index of inequality (SII) and concentration index (CI); and transplant capacity gap was estimated by comparing observed volumes with PMP benchmarks from very-high-HDI countries.

Findings: Global transplants rose 76% (101,990-179,091); PMP increased 15.1 → 23.1 (EAPC 2.5%). Kidney transplantation accounted for 65% of all solid organ transplants in 2023, representing the largest share of global activity; lung transplantation showed the fastest relative growth. Two procedures declined globally-pancreas-only transplantation and small-bowel transplantation. Absolute volumes were highest in the USA, China, and India, but PMP ranged from >120 (Spain, USA) to <5 in most low-HDI countries. Growth accrued mainly in very-high-HDI settings, with minimal contribution from low-HDI regions. Japan showed persistently low rates despite very-high-HDI status, whereas Mongolia achieved the world's highest EAPC despite low HDI. Inequality widened by SII (55.9 → 73.9), while CI fell modestly (0.61 → 0.53). Benchmarking indicated the largest transplant capacity gap for kidney (>200,000 procedures), then liver (>80,000) and heart (>30,000); coverage remained <10% in most low-HDI countries.

Interpretation: Global activity increased substantially but gains concentrated in very-high-HDI countries, and inequities persist. Outlier trajectories highlight sociocultural and policy factors beyond economic development. Large benchmark-based gaps-especially for kidney, liver, and heart-remain across low- and middle-HDI settings. Strategic investment in policy, infrastructure, and integration of transplantation within universal health coverage is essential to advance equitable access.

Funding: The Integrated Fund4150102990-58803-0/Prof. Dr. Z.K. Chen; The Fund of Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation2025A03J4036.

背景:实体器官移植是终末期器官衰竭的最终治疗方法,但在世界范围内,获得器官移植的机会是高度不公平的。跨器官、区域和发展环境的可比长期证据仍然有限。方法:分析世界卫生组织全球捐赠和移植观察站(GODT) 2008-2023年6个实体器官的数据。计算了每百万人口(PMP)率和估计的年百分比变化(EAPC);采用不平等斜率指数(SII)和浓度指数(CI)量化人类发展指数(HDI)、世卫组织区域和全球疾病负担2021 (GBD 2021)区域之间的差异;通过将观察到的数量与hdi非常高的国家的PMP基准进行比较,估计了移植能力差距。研究结果:全球移植增加了76% (101990 - 179091);PMP升高15.1→23.1 (EAPC升高2.5%)。2023年,肾移植占所有实体器官移植的65%,占全球活动的最大份额;肺移植相对增长最快。两种手术在全球范围内均有所下降——仅胰腺移植和小肠移植。绝对容量在美国、中国和印度最高,但PMP从>20(西班牙、美国)到200,000例不等,其次是肝脏(>80000)和心脏(>30000);解释:全球活动大幅增加,但收益集中在人类发展指数非常高的国家,不平等现象仍然存在。异常轨迹突出了经济发展之外的社会文化和政策因素。在中低hdi环境中,基于基准的巨大差距——尤其是肾脏、肝脏和心脏——仍然存在。在政策、基础设施和将移植纳入全民健康覆盖方面进行战略投资,对于促进公平获取至关重要。基金资助:综合基金4150102990-58803-0/教授。陈志刚博士;广州市器官移植重点实验室基金20125a03j4036;
{"title":"Global inequities in organ transplantation, 2008-2023: trends, unmet need, and policy implications.","authors":"Peng Hao, Qing He, Haifeng Li, Xiaohong Qiu, Zhonghua Klaus Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103788","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103788","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Solid organ transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage organ failure, yet access is highly inequitable worldwide. Comparable long-term evidence across organs, regions, and development settings remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the WHO Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (GODT) for six solid organs (2008-2023) were analyzed. Per-million population (PMP) rates and the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) were calculated; disparities by Human Development Index (HDI), WHO regions, and Global Burden of Disease 2021 (GBD 2021) regions were quantified using the slope index of inequality (SII) and concentration index (CI); and transplant capacity gap was estimated by comparing observed volumes with PMP benchmarks from very-high-HDI countries.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Global transplants rose 76% (101,990-179,091); PMP increased 15.1 → 23.1 (EAPC 2.5%). Kidney transplantation accounted for 65% of all solid organ transplants in 2023, representing the largest share of global activity; lung transplantation showed the fastest relative growth. Two procedures declined globally-pancreas-only transplantation and small-bowel transplantation. Absolute volumes were highest in the USA, China, and India, but PMP ranged from >120 (Spain, USA) to <5 in most low-HDI countries. Growth accrued mainly in very-high-HDI settings, with minimal contribution from low-HDI regions. Japan showed persistently low rates despite very-high-HDI status, whereas Mongolia achieved the world's highest EAPC despite low HDI. Inequality widened by SII (55.9 → 73.9), while CI fell modestly (0.61 → 0.53). Benchmarking indicated the largest transplant capacity gap for kidney (>200,000 procedures), then liver (>80,000) and heart (>30,000); coverage remained <10% in most low-HDI countries.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Global activity increased substantially but gains concentrated in very-high-HDI countries, and inequities persist. Outlier trajectories highlight sociocultural and policy factors beyond economic development. Large benchmark-based gaps-especially for kidney, liver, and heart-remain across low- and middle-HDI settings. Strategic investment in policy, infrastructure, and integration of transplantation within universal health coverage is essential to advance equitable access.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Integrated Fund4150102990-58803-0/Prof. Dr. Z.K. Chen; The Fund of Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation2025A03J4036.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103788"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12925128/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147276237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reno-protective effects of statins among patients with chronic kidney disease in Hong Kong: a target trial emulation. 他汀类药物在香港慢性肾脏疾病患者中的雷诺保护作用:一项目标试验模拟。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103798
Zoey Cho Ting Wong, Franco Wing Tak Cheng, Ivy Lynn Mak, Emily Tsui Yee Tse, Sydney Chi Wai Tang, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Eric Yuk Fai Wan

Background: Many existing randomised controlled trials lack sufficient power to assess primary kidney outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether statin therapy offers a clinically meaningful reno-protective effect in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records in Hong Kong were extracted to perform sequential target trial emulation. Eligible adults (aged 18+ years) with CKD who met the indication for statin initiation between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 31, 2017 were included; those with history of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 were excluded. Participants were categorised as statin initiators or non-initiators at each calendar month during inclusion period, where statin initiators were propensity score-matched with non-initiators. Follow-up data were collected for all participants until the occurrence of outcomes, death, loss to follow-up (2 years after last records), or the end of data availability (Dec 31, 2022), whichever occurred first. The hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality, eGFR deterioration (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, ≥30% eGFR decline, and ≥50% eGFR decline) and composite outcomes (all-cause mortality, eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ≥50% eGFR decline) was estimated by pooled logistic regression using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) approach.

Findings: 1,437,014 eligible person-trials were identified (statin initiators n = 30,907; non-initiators n = 1,406,107), from which 30,892 statin initiators and 108,380 non-initiators were included after propensity-score matching. Relative to non-initiators, significant risk reduction was found among statin initiators in all-cause mortality (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)], ITT: 0.97 [0.95-0.98]; PP: 0.91 [0.88-0.93]), progression to eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (ITT: 0.91 [0.89-0.93]; PP: 0.77 [0.74-0.80]), ≥50% eGFR decline (ITT: 0.95 [0.93-0.98]; PP: 0.89 [0.84-0.93]), and composite outcomes (ITT: 0.96 [0.94-0.97]; PP: 0.90 [0.88-0.92]). Statin therapy initiation was also associated significantly with reduced risk of ≥30% eGFR decline using PP approach (0.94 [0.92-0.96]).

Interpretation: Over a 10-year follow-up period, initiating statin therapy in patients with CKD was associated with a small yet significant decrease in all-cause mortality and a modest reno-protective effect. Future research should aim to clarify the effects of statin intensity, duration, and adherence.

Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China.

背景:许多现有的随机对照试验缺乏足够的能力来评估原发性肾脏预后。本研究旨在评估他汀类药物治疗对慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者是否具有临床意义的肾保护作用。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,提取香港的电子健康记录,进行顺序目标试验模拟。纳入2008年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间符合他汀类药物起始适应症的CKD患者(18岁以上);排除肾小球滤过率(eGFR) < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者。在纳入期间的每个日历月,参与者被分类为他汀类药物启动者或非他汀类药物启动者,其中他汀类药物启动者与非他汀类药物启动者倾向评分匹配。收集所有参与者的随访数据,直到发生结局、死亡、随访中断(最后一次记录后2年)或数据可用性终止(2022年12月31日),以先发生者为准。采用意向性治疗(ITT)和按方案(PP)方法,通过合并逻辑回归估计全因死亡率、eGFR恶化(eGFR 2、eGFR下降≥30%和eGFR下降≥50%)和综合结果(全因死亡率、eGFR 2和eGFR下降≥50%)的危险比(HR)。结果:1437,014名符合条件的受试者被确定(他汀类药物启动者n = 30,907;非他汀类药物启动者n = 1,406,107),在倾向评分匹配后,其中30,892名他汀类药物启动者和108,380名非他汀类药物启动者被纳入。与非他汀类药物启动者相比,他汀类药物启动者的全因死亡率显著降低(HR[95%可信区间(CI)], ITT: 0.97 [0.95-0.98];PP: 0.91[0.88-0.93])、进展到eGFR 2 (ITT: 0.91 [0.89-0.93]; PP: 0.77[0.74-0.80])、eGFR下降≥50% (ITT: 0.95 [0.93-0.98]; PP: 0.89[0.84-0.93])和综合结果(ITT: 0.96 [0.94-0.97]; PP: 0.90[0.88-0.92])。开始他汀类药物治疗也与使用PP方法降低eGFR下降≥30%的风险显著相关(0.94[0.92-0.96])。解释:在10年的随访期内,CKD患者开始他汀类药物治疗与全因死亡率的小幅但显著下降和适度的肾保护作用相关。未来的研究应旨在阐明他汀类药物强度、持续时间和依从性的影响。资助项目:国家自然科学基金。
{"title":"Reno-protective effects of statins among patients with chronic kidney disease in Hong Kong: a target trial emulation.","authors":"Zoey Cho Ting Wong, Franco Wing Tak Cheng, Ivy Lynn Mak, Emily Tsui Yee Tse, Sydney Chi Wai Tang, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Eric Yuk Fai Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many existing randomised controlled trials lack sufficient power to assess primary kidney outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether statin therapy offers a clinically meaningful reno-protective effect in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records in Hong Kong were extracted to perform sequential target trial emulation. Eligible adults (aged 18+ years) with CKD who met the indication for statin initiation between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 31, 2017 were included; those with history of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> were excluded. Participants were categorised as statin initiators or non-initiators at each calendar month during inclusion period, where statin initiators were propensity score-matched with non-initiators. Follow-up data were collected for all participants until the occurrence of outcomes, death, loss to follow-up (2 years after last records), or the end of data availability (Dec 31, 2022), whichever occurred first. The hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality, eGFR deterioration (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, ≥30% eGFR decline, and ≥50% eGFR decline) and composite outcomes (all-cause mortality, eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and ≥50% eGFR decline) was estimated by pooled logistic regression using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) approach.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>1,437,014 eligible person-trials were identified (statin initiators n = 30,907; non-initiators n = 1,406,107), from which 30,892 statin initiators and 108,380 non-initiators were included after propensity-score matching. Relative to non-initiators, significant risk reduction was found among statin initiators in all-cause mortality (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)], ITT: 0.97 [0.95-0.98]; PP: 0.91 [0.88-0.93]), progression to eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (ITT: 0.91 [0.89-0.93]; PP: 0.77 [0.74-0.80]), ≥50% eGFR decline (ITT: 0.95 [0.93-0.98]; PP: 0.89 [0.84-0.93]), and composite outcomes (ITT: 0.96 [0.94-0.97]; PP: 0.90 [0.88-0.92]). Statin therapy initiation was also associated significantly with reduced risk of ≥30% eGFR decline using PP approach (0.94 [0.92-0.96]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Over a 10-year follow-up period, initiating statin therapy in patients with CKD was associated with a small yet significant decrease in all-cause mortality and a modest reno-protective effect. Future research should aim to clarify the effects of statin intensity, duration, and adherence.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103798"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12925127/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to "Effects of modified release hydrocortisone on restoration of early morning cortisol, quality of life, and fatigue in adrenal insufficiency (The CHAMPAIN study): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study comparing Chronocort and Plenadren"[eClinical Medicine 91(2026); 103714]. “改良释放氢化可的松对肾上腺功能不全患者恢复清晨皮质醇、生活质量和疲劳的影响(The CHAMPAIN研究):一项随机、双盲、双假、比较Chronocort和Plenadren的交叉研究”的更正[临床医学91(2026);103714]。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103787
Alessandro Prete, Verena Theiler-Schwetz, Wiebke Arlt, Jon Hazeldine, Irina-Oana Chifu, Birgit Harbeck, Catherine Napier, John D C Newell-Price, D Aled Rees, Nicole Reisch, Günter K Stalla, Helen Coope, Kerry Maltby, John Porter, Jo Quirke, Richard J Ross

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103714.].

[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1016/ j.c eclinm.2025.103714.]。
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Effects of modified release hydrocortisone on restoration of early morning cortisol, quality of life, and fatigue in adrenal insufficiency (The CHAMPAIN study): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study comparing Chronocort and Plenadren\"[eClinical Medicine 91(2026); 103714].","authors":"Alessandro Prete, Verena Theiler-Schwetz, Wiebke Arlt, Jon Hazeldine, Irina-Oana Chifu, Birgit Harbeck, Catherine Napier, John D C Newell-Price, D Aled Rees, Nicole Reisch, Günter K Stalla, Helen Coope, Kerry Maltby, John Porter, Jo Quirke, Richard J Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103787","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103714.].</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103787"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146225970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of molecular point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in acute respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 呼吸道病原体分子点护理检测对急性呼吸道感染抗生素使用和临床结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103799
Qinyuan Li, Qi Zhou, Jiangbo Fan, Xifeng Feng, Honghao Lai, Yaolong Chen, Zhikang Ye, Fujian Song, Jiao Liu, Dechang Chen, Rui Kang, Daolin Tang, Jean-Louis Teboul, Jean-Francois Timsit, Antoni Torres, Jan J De Waele, Jordi Carratalà, Jianxin Jiang, Zhengxiu Luo, Ling Zeng

Background: Molecular point-of-care testing (mPOCT) offers rapid identification of respiratory pathogens, but its impact on antibiotic use and patient outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effects of mPOCT on antibiotic use and major clinical outcomes in patients presenting with acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs).

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CNKI, and Wanfang Data from inception to July 1, 2025, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating mPOCT for patients presenting with ARTIs (PROSPERO CRD420251069333). The primary outcome was antibiotic use, assessed using pooled risk ratio (RR) with random-effects models. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials (ROBUST-RCT) and core Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), respectively.

Findings: We included 25 RCTs involving 12,638 patients, of whom 61.0% were adults. Overall, mPOCT probably had little to no important effect on antibiotic use (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00; moderate certainty) or treatment duration (mean difference -0.44 days, 95% CI -0.98 to 0.09; moderate certainty). In adults, high-certainty evidence showed no effect on antibiotic use (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02), whereas in children, low-certainty evidence suggested a potential reduction (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97). Although mPOCT increased appropriate antibiotic prescribing (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.55-2.77; moderate certainty), it did not affect 30-day mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15; high certainty) and intensive care unit admission (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.65-1.25; high certainty).

Interpretation: Moderate to high certainty evidence suggests that mPOCT does not meaningfully reduce overall antibiotic use or improve patient outcomes, particularly in adults, despite enhancing prescribing appropriateness. Routine use of mPOCT for adults with ARTIs is therefore not supported.

Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Postdoctoral Science Foundation, the Chongqing Municipality Joint Science and Health Major Medical Research Project, Outstanding Youth in Science and Technology, the Chongqing Youth Talent Fund, and the Research Foundation Flanders.

背景:分子点护理检测(mPOCT)提供了呼吸道病原体的快速鉴定,但其对抗生素使用和患者预后的影响仍不确定。我们的目的是全面评估mPOCT对急性呼吸道感染(ARTIs)患者抗生素使用和主要临床结局的影响。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、CENTRAL、CNKI和万方数据,检索自成立至2025年7月1日的评估ARTIs患者mPOCT的随机对照试验(rct) (PROSPERO CRD420251069333)。主要终点是抗生素使用,使用随机效应模型的综合风险比(RR)进行评估。分别使用用于随机对照试验系统评价(ROBUST-RCT)的偏倚风险工具和推荐、评估、发展和评价的核心分级(GRADE)来评估偏倚风险和证据确定性。结果:我们纳入了25项随机对照试验,涉及12,638例患者,其中61.0%为成人。总体而言,mPOCT可能对抗生素使用(RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00;中等确定性)或治疗时间(平均差值-0.44天,95% CI -0.98 - 0.09;中等确定性)几乎没有重要影响。在成人中,高确定性证据显示抗生素使用没有影响(RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02),而在儿童中,低确定性证据显示抗生素使用可能减少(RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97)。虽然mPOCT增加了适当的抗生素处方(RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.55-2.77,中等确定性),但它没有影响30天死亡率(RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15,高确定性)和重症监护病房入院率(RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.65-1.25,高确定性)。解释:中度到高确定性的证据表明,尽管提高了处方的适当性,但mPOCT并没有显著减少抗生素的总体使用或改善患者的预后,特别是在成人中。因此,不支持成人art患者常规使用mPOCT。资助项目:国家自然科学基金、博士后科学基金、重庆市科学与卫生联合重大医学研究项目、杰出青年科技、重庆市青年人才基金、佛兰德斯研究基金。
{"title":"Impact of molecular point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in acute respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qinyuan Li, Qi Zhou, Jiangbo Fan, Xifeng Feng, Honghao Lai, Yaolong Chen, Zhikang Ye, Fujian Song, Jiao Liu, Dechang Chen, Rui Kang, Daolin Tang, Jean-Louis Teboul, Jean-Francois Timsit, Antoni Torres, Jan J De Waele, Jordi Carratalà, Jianxin Jiang, Zhengxiu Luo, Ling Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103799","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molecular point-of-care testing (mPOCT) offers rapid identification of respiratory pathogens, but its impact on antibiotic use and patient outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effects of mPOCT on antibiotic use and major clinical outcomes in patients presenting with acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CNKI, and Wanfang Data from inception to July 1, 2025, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating mPOCT for patients presenting with ARTIs (PROSPERO CRD420251069333). The primary outcome was antibiotic use, assessed using pooled risk ratio (RR) with random-effects models. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials (ROBUST-RCT) and core Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), respectively.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 25 RCTs involving 12,638 patients, of whom 61.0% were adults. Overall, mPOCT probably had little to no important effect on antibiotic use (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00; moderate certainty) or treatment duration (mean difference -0.44 days, 95% CI -0.98 to 0.09; moderate certainty). In adults, high-certainty evidence showed no effect on antibiotic use (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02), whereas in children, low-certainty evidence suggested a potential reduction (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97). Although mPOCT increased appropriate antibiotic prescribing (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.55-2.77; moderate certainty), it did not affect 30-day mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15; high certainty) and intensive care unit admission (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.65-1.25; high certainty).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Moderate to high certainty evidence suggests that mPOCT does not meaningfully reduce overall antibiotic use or improve patient outcomes, particularly in adults, despite enhancing prescribing appropriateness. Routine use of mPOCT for adults with ARTIs is therefore not supported.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Postdoctoral Science Foundation, the Chongqing Municipality Joint Science and Health Major Medical Research Project, Outstanding Youth in Science and Technology, the Chongqing Youth Talent Fund, and the Research Foundation Flanders.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103799"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12925124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Progestogen use and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 孕激素的使用和颅内脑膜瘤的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103791
Benoit Hudelist, Alexandre Roux, Emmanuelle Huet-Mignaton, Isabelle Dufaure-Gare, Alessandro Moiraghi, Angela Elia, Maimiti Seneca, Corentin Provost, Joseph Benzakoun, Alexandre Gehanno, Catherine Oppenheim, Marc Zanello, Johan Pallud

Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumours in adults. Concerns have emerged about a possible link between progestogen use and intracranial meningioma; we assessed this association.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, EPI-PHARE database (from inception up to November 01, 2025), pharmacovigilance reports, and backward snowballing. Eligible publications were English or French epidemiological studies, reporting associations between progestogens and intracranial meningiomas. We excluded non-original reports, abstracts-only, and studies without eligible progestogen exposure or meningioma outcomes. We extracted summary data from published reports. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence with GRADE. The primary outcome was intracranial meningioma. Secondary outcomes were malignancy, location, and regression. Random-effects models were used, and heterogeneity was assessed with I2; a narrative synthesis was also performed.

Findings: Of 542 records screened, 78 studies were included in the review, and 14 high-quality observational studies in meta-analysis; all 14 were NOS high quality, although residual confounding and potential outcome misclassification cannot be excluded. Cyproterone acetate (CPA) was associated with increased meningioma risk (5 studies; 1047 exposed; pooled-OR 12.36 (95% CI: 7.47-20.45); I2: 73.8%; GRADE: moderate). Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate was also associated (6 studies; 842 exposed; pooled-OR 2.68 (95% CI: 1.72-4.19); I2: 92.7%; GRADE: low). Chlormadinone acetate (CMA), nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC), promegestone, medrogestone, and desogestrel showed signals of increased risk (CMA 3 studies, 164-683 exposed; NOMAC 3, 171-969; promegestone 1, 83; medrogestone 1, 42; desogestrel 2, 115-287). We did not pool these estimates due to sparse, heterogeneous evidence. No signal was found for norgestrel, levonorgestrel, progesterone, dydrogesterone, or spironolactone; evidence for dienogest and hydroxyprogesterone was insufficient. Regression after withdrawal was reported for CPA and NOMAC. Tumours were predominantly anterior/middle skull base, and malignant meningiomas were more frequent with CPA, CMA, and NOMAC.

Interpretation: The certainty of evidence was limited by the observational design, residual confounding, heterogeneity, and imprecision for some exposures. Use of specific progestogens, particularly high dose macroprogestogens may be associated with an increased risk of intracranial meningioma. Transparent patient information and careful clinical and, where appropriate, imaging follow-up are essential.

Funding: None.

背景:脑膜瘤是成人最常见的原发性脑肿瘤。人们担心孕激素的使用与颅内脑膜瘤之间可能存在联系;我们评估了这种关联。方法:在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、EPI-PHARE数据库(从成立到2025年11月1日)、药物警戒报告和回溯滚雪球。符合条件的出版物是英语或法语流行病学研究,报告了孕激素和颅内脑膜瘤之间的关系。我们排除了非原始报告、纯摘要和没有符合条件的孕激素暴露或脑膜瘤结果的研究。我们从已发表的报告中提取汇总数据。偏倚风险用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估,证据确定性用GRADE评估。主要结局为颅内脑膜瘤。次要结局为恶性、部位和消退。采用随机效应模型,用I2评估异质性;还进行了叙事综合。结果:在筛选的542项记录中,78项研究纳入综述,14项高质量观察性研究纳入meta分析;所有14例均为NOS高质量,但不能排除残留混淆和潜在的结局错误分类。醋酸环丙孕酮(CPA)与脑膜瘤风险增加相关(5项研究;1047项暴露;合并or为12.36 (95% CI: 7.47-20.45);I2: 73.8%;成绩:中等)。醋酸甲孕酮也有相关性(6项研究;842项暴露;合并or为2.68 (95% CI: 1.72-4.19);I2: 92.7%;等级:低)。醋酸氯马地酮(CMA)、醋酸甲孕酮(NOMAC)、孕酮、地孕酮和地孕酮显示出风险增加的信号(CMA 3项研究,164-683;NOMAC 3项研究,171-969;孕酮1项研究,83;地孕酮1项研究,42;地孕酮2项研究,115-287)。由于证据稀少,我们没有汇总这些估计。未发现诺孕酮、左炔诺孕酮、孕酮、地孕酮或螺内酯的信号;双孕酮和羟孕酮的证据不足。停药后CPA和NOMAC均有回归。肿瘤主要发生在颅底前部/中部,恶性脑膜瘤在CPA、CMA和NOMAC中更为常见。解释:证据的确定性受到观察设计、残留混杂、异质性和某些暴露的不精确性的限制。使用特定的孕激素,特别是大剂量孕激素可能与颅内脑膜瘤的风险增加有关。透明的患者信息和仔细的临床随访以及在适当情况下的影像学随访是必不可少的。资金:没有。
{"title":"Progestogen use and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Benoit Hudelist, Alexandre Roux, Emmanuelle Huet-Mignaton, Isabelle Dufaure-Gare, Alessandro Moiraghi, Angela Elia, Maimiti Seneca, Corentin Provost, Joseph Benzakoun, Alexandre Gehanno, Catherine Oppenheim, Marc Zanello, Johan Pallud","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumours in adults. Concerns have emerged about a possible link between progestogen use and intracranial meningioma; we assessed this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, EPI-PHARE database (from inception up to November 01, 2025), pharmacovigilance reports, and backward snowballing. Eligible publications were English or French epidemiological studies, reporting associations between progestogens and intracranial meningiomas. We excluded non-original reports, abstracts-only, and studies without eligible progestogen exposure or meningioma outcomes. We extracted summary data from published reports. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence with GRADE. The primary outcome was intracranial meningioma. Secondary outcomes were malignancy, location, and regression. Random-effects models were used, and heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup>; a narrative synthesis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 542 records screened, 78 studies were included in the review, and 14 high-quality observational studies in meta-analysis; all 14 were NOS high quality, although residual confounding and potential outcome misclassification cannot be excluded. Cyproterone acetate (CPA) was associated with increased meningioma risk (5 studies; 1047 exposed; pooled-OR 12.36 (95% CI: 7.47-20.45); I<sup>2</sup>: 73.8%; GRADE: moderate). Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate was also associated (6 studies; 842 exposed; pooled-OR 2.68 (95% CI: 1.72-4.19); I<sup>2</sup>: 92.7%; GRADE: low). Chlormadinone acetate (CMA), nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC), promegestone, medrogestone, and desogestrel showed signals of increased risk (CMA 3 studies, 164-683 exposed; NOMAC 3, 171-969; promegestone 1, 83; medrogestone 1, 42; desogestrel 2, 115-287). We did not pool these estimates due to sparse, heterogeneous evidence. No signal was found for norgestrel, levonorgestrel, progesterone, dydrogesterone, or spironolactone; evidence for dienogest and hydroxyprogesterone was insufficient. Regression after withdrawal was reported for CPA and NOMAC. Tumours were predominantly anterior/middle skull base, and malignant meningiomas were more frequent with CPA, CMA, and NOMAC.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The certainty of evidence was limited by the observational design, residual confounding, heterogeneity, and imprecision for some exposures. Use of specific progestogens, particularly high dose macroprogestogens may be associated with an increased risk of intracranial meningioma. Transparent patient information and careful clinical and, where appropriate, imaging follow-up are essential.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103791"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12925135/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do world-wide policy initiatives for regulating health care related artificial intelligence safeguard the declaration of Helsinki? 监管与卫生保健有关的人工智能的全球政策举措是否能保障《赫尔辛基宣言》?
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-11 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103784
Antonis A Armoundas, Joseph Loscalzo

Digital health technologies and artificial intelligence (AI), are transforming medical research, health care, and public health. The ever-increasing usage of algorithms in health care has challenged governments, regulatory agencies, health organizations, developers, and providers, and AI raises novel ethical challenges that extend beyond the jurisdiction of traditional borders and regulatory health-care processes and structures. While there is growing consensus in recognizing these ethical challenges, there is less agreement over the necessary AI guardrails. This Viewpoint offers a synthesis of representative AI-enabled health policy approaches across jurisdictions and advances practical recommendations for an adaptive, international AI policy and governance framework that will be responsible for monitoring and advancing its regulations in pace with the rapid growth of AI technologies. We use the Declaration of Helsinki as a normative reference point, to derive risk-proportionate safeguards for AI-enabled health across research and non-research settings.

数字卫生技术和人工智能(AI)正在改变医学研究、卫生保健和公共卫生。算法在医疗保健领域的不断增加使用给政府、监管机构、卫生组织、开发人员和提供者带来了挑战,人工智能提出了新的道德挑战,超出了传统边界和监管医疗保健流程和结构的管辖范围。尽管人们在认识到这些道德挑战方面达成了越来越多的共识,但在必要的人工智能护栏问题上却没有达成一致。本观点综合了各司法管辖区具有代表性的人工智能卫生政策方法,并就适应性的国际人工智能政策和治理框架提出了切实可行的建议,该框架将负责监测和推进其法规,以跟上人工智能技术的快速发展。我们将《赫尔辛基宣言》作为规范性参考点,为研究和非研究环境中的人工智能健康制定与风险成比例的保障措施。
{"title":"Do world-wide policy initiatives for regulating health care related artificial intelligence safeguard the declaration of Helsinki?","authors":"Antonis A Armoundas, Joseph Loscalzo","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103784","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103784","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital health technologies and artificial intelligence (AI), are transforming medical research, health care, and public health. The ever-increasing usage of algorithms in health care has challenged governments, regulatory agencies, health organizations, developers, and providers, and AI raises novel ethical challenges that extend beyond the jurisdiction of traditional borders and regulatory health-care processes and structures. While there is growing consensus in recognizing these ethical challenges, there is less agreement over the necessary AI guardrails. This Viewpoint offers a synthesis of representative AI-enabled health policy approaches across jurisdictions and advances practical recommendations for an adaptive, international AI policy and governance framework that will be responsible for monitoring and advancing its regulations in pace with the rapid growth of AI technologies. We use the Declaration of Helsinki as a normative reference point, to derive risk-proportionate safeguards for AI-enabled health across research and non-research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103784"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914512/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forecasting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in heart failure with artificial intelligence. 人工智能预测心力衰竭左室收缩功能障碍。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-09 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103783
Teya Bergamaschi, Tiffany Yau, Payal Chandak, Abena Kyereme-Tuah, Judy Hung, Hanna Gaggin, Isaac S Kohane, Collin M Stultz

Background: Objective assessment of left ventricular function remains a key prognosticator that is used to guide therapeutic decisions for patients with heart failure (HF). However, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is dynamic, with worsening LVEF linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients at risk of LVEF decline would improve prognostication and enable timely therapeutic intervention.

Methods: We developed a deep learning model to Predict changes in left ventricULar Systolic function from Electrocardiograms (ECG) of patients who have Heart Failure (PULSE-HF). The model integrates 12-lead ECG waveforms with a patient's history of prior LVEF measurements to calculate the likelihood that the LVEF will be less than 40% during the year after the ECG is obtained. The model is retrospectively developed and tested using data from one hospital and externally validated on retrospective cohorts from two different hospitals. The internal development data was collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. The external validation datasets were collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021 at one hospital and between 2008 and 2019 at the other hospital.

Findings: PULSE-HF demonstrates strong discriminatory ability with respect to forecasting whether the LVEF would be below 40% within the next year, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 87.5-91.4% across all three HF cohorts. Among patients with HF who have a baseline LVEF above 40%, PULSE-HF effectively identified those at risk of worsening LVEF with AUROCs of 81.6-86.3% across all three datasets. PULSE-HF's discriminatory ability remained consistently high across a range of subgroups with different comorbidities and regardless of medical therapy. Assuming an underlying prevalence of LVEF worsening of 10% per year, PULSE-HF's negative predictive values are over 97%, assuming an underlying sensitivity of 80%. Lastly, we demonstrate that a lead I version of PULSE-HF has a performance similar to the performance of the model that uses all 12 ECG leads.

Interpretation: PULSE-HF robustly predicts worsening LVEF in patients who have a prior diagnosis of HF. The method provides a platform for identifying patients who are at an increased risk of worsening systolic dysfunction.

Funding: This work was supported, in part, by a grant from Quanta Computers.

背景:客观评估左心室功能仍然是指导心力衰竭(HF)患者治疗决策的关键预后指标。然而,左心室射血分数(LVEF)是动态的,LVEF的恶化与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。识别有LVEF下降风险的患者将改善预后并使及时的治疗干预成为可能。方法:我们开发了一个深度学习模型来预测心力衰竭(PULSE-HF)患者的心电图(ECG)左心室收缩功能的变化。该模型将12导联心电图波形与患者先前LVEF测量的历史结合起来,计算出在获得心电图后的一年内LVEF低于40%的可能性。该模型采用一家医院的数据进行回顾性开发和测试,并通过来自两家不同医院的回顾性队列进行外部验证。内部发展数据是在2000年1月1日至2021年6月30日期间收集的。外部验证数据集收集于一家医院2000年1月1日至2021年6月30日期间和另一家医院2008年至2019年期间。研究结果:PULSE-HF在预测下一年内LVEF是否会低于40%方面表现出很强的区分能力,在所有三个HF队列中,受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)为87.5-91.4%。在基线LVEF高于40%的HF患者中,PULSE-HF有效地识别出LVEF恶化的风险,所有三个数据集的auroc为81.6-86.3%。PULSE-HF的区分能力在具有不同合并症的一系列亚组中始终保持高水平,无论药物治疗如何。假设LVEF的潜在患病率每年恶化10%,PULSE-HF的负预测值超过97%,假设潜在敏感性为80%。最后,我们证明了PULSE-HF导联I版本的性能与使用所有12个ECG导联的模型的性能相似。解释:PULSE-HF可以可靠地预测先前诊断为HF的患者LVEF恶化。该方法为识别收缩功能障碍恶化风险增加的患者提供了一个平台。经费:这项工作得到了广达计算机公司的部分资助。
{"title":"Forecasting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in heart failure with artificial intelligence.","authors":"Teya Bergamaschi, Tiffany Yau, Payal Chandak, Abena Kyereme-Tuah, Judy Hung, Hanna Gaggin, Isaac S Kohane, Collin M Stultz","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103783","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103783","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective assessment of left ventricular function remains a key prognosticator that is used to guide therapeutic decisions for patients with heart failure (HF). However, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is dynamic, with worsening LVEF linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients at risk of LVEF decline would improve prognostication and enable timely therapeutic intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a deep learning model to Predict changes in left ventricULar Systolic function from Electrocardiograms (ECG) of patients who have Heart Failure (PULSE-HF). The model integrates 12-lead ECG waveforms with a patient's history of prior LVEF measurements to calculate the likelihood that the LVEF will be less than 40% during the year after the ECG is obtained. The model is retrospectively developed and tested using data from one hospital and externally validated on retrospective cohorts from two different hospitals. The internal development data was collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. The external validation datasets were collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021 at one hospital and between 2008 and 2019 at the other hospital.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>PULSE-HF demonstrates strong discriminatory ability with respect to forecasting whether the LVEF would be below 40% within the next year, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 87.5-91.4% across all three HF cohorts. Among patients with HF who have a baseline LVEF above 40%, PULSE-HF effectively identified those at risk of worsening LVEF with AUROCs of 81.6-86.3% across all three datasets. PULSE-HF's discriminatory ability remained consistently high across a range of subgroups with different comorbidities and regardless of medical therapy. Assuming an underlying prevalence of LVEF worsening of 10% per year, PULSE-HF's negative predictive values are over 97%, assuming an underlying sensitivity of 80%. Lastly, we demonstrate that a lead I version of PULSE-HF has a performance similar to the performance of the model that uses all 12 ECG leads.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>PULSE-HF robustly predicts worsening LVEF in patients who have a prior diagnosis of HF. The method provides a platform for identifying patients who are at an increased risk of worsening systolic dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported, in part, by a grant from Quanta Computers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103783"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914115/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
EClinicalMedicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1