Pub Date : 2026-01-05eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103711
Cole D Bendor, Aya Bardugo, Avishai M Tsur, Estela Derazne, Itay I Shemesh, Lotmit Bourvine, Dror Dicker, Ben Boursi, Amir Tirosh, Arnon Afek, Ran S Rotem, Gabriel Chodick, Gilad Twig
Background: High body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable cancer risk factor, projected to surpass smoking as the leading preventable risk factor. The impact of weight change from late adolescence to adulthood on cancer risk remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between adolescence-to-adulthood BMI trajectories and obesity-related cancer risk.
Methods: A population-based cohort study of 800,024 people (45.1% women) insured by a large state-mandated health provider. BMI was measured during military pre-recruitment evaluations during 1967-2018 in adolescence and in subsequent clinic visits in adulthood during 1998-2020. Follow-up began one year after an adult BMI measurement until cancer diagnosis, death, transfer to another health provider, or December 16, 2021. BMI trajectories from adolescence to adulthood were classified as lean-to-lean, lean-to-high, high-to-lean, and high-to-high (cutoff: sex-specific and age-specific 85th percentile in adolescence, defined according to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts, and 25 kg/m2 in adulthood). Weight change was also assessed per 5% increments. The primary outcome was obesity-related cancers including esophagus, postmenopausal breast, liver and gallbladder, stomach, pancreas, colon and rectum, kidney, multiple myeloma, thyroid, uterus and ovary. The secondary outcome was obesity-related cancers diagnosed before age 50 years (early-onset cancers). Cox proportional hazards models were applied.
Findings: During 7,610,263 person-years, 6,376 people were diagnosed with obesity-related cancers, at a mean age of 53.3 ± 9.8 years. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.39) for lean-to-high, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.78-1.31) for high-to-lean, and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.34-1.61) for high-to-high groups, compared to the lean-to-lean group. Respective HRs for early-onset obesity-related cancers were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.20-1.47), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.60-1.31), and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.20-1.61). Each 5% weight gain conferred a 3% increased hazard (95% CI, 1.02-1.03), with a similar 3% increase for early-onset cancers (95% CI, 1.02-1.04). Cancer-specific risks included 3% (95% CI, 1.02-1.04) for postmenopausal breast cancer, 3% (95% CI, 1.01-1.04) for colorectal cancer, 4% (95% CI, 1.02-1.05) for thyroid cancer, 5% (95% CI, 1.04-1.07) for kidney cancer, and 8% (95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for uterine cancer. Some cancers, including leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, were not associated with weight gain but were positively associated with high adolescent BMI.
Interpretation: Maintaining a healthy BMI from adolescence to adulthood may reduce obesity-related cancer risk, including early-onset, highlighting the importance of early weight management strategies.
{"title":"Adolescent to adulthood weight trajectories and the risk of obesity-related cancers, overall and early-onset: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Cole D Bendor, Aya Bardugo, Avishai M Tsur, Estela Derazne, Itay I Shemesh, Lotmit Bourvine, Dror Dicker, Ben Boursi, Amir Tirosh, Arnon Afek, Ran S Rotem, Gabriel Chodick, Gilad Twig","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103711","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103711","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable cancer risk factor, projected to surpass smoking as the leading preventable risk factor. The impact of weight change from late adolescence to adulthood on cancer risk remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between adolescence-to-adulthood BMI trajectories and obesity-related cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cohort study of 800,024 people (45.1% women) insured by a large state-mandated health provider. BMI was measured during military pre-recruitment evaluations during 1967-2018 in adolescence and in subsequent clinic visits in adulthood during 1998-2020. Follow-up began one year after an adult BMI measurement until cancer diagnosis, death, transfer to another health provider, or December 16, 2021. BMI trajectories from adolescence to adulthood were classified as lean-to-lean, lean-to-high, high-to-lean, and high-to-high (cutoff: sex-specific and age-specific 85th percentile in adolescence, defined according to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts, and 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in adulthood). Weight change was also assessed per 5% increments. The primary outcome was obesity-related cancers including esophagus, postmenopausal breast, liver and gallbladder, stomach, pancreas, colon and rectum, kidney, multiple myeloma, thyroid, uterus and ovary. The secondary outcome was obesity-related cancers diagnosed before age 50 years (early-onset cancers). Cox proportional hazards models were applied.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During 7,610,263 person-years, 6,376 people were diagnosed with obesity-related cancers, at a mean age of 53.3 ± 9.8 years. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.39) for lean-to-high, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.78-1.31) for high-to-lean, and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.34-1.61) for high-to-high groups, compared to the lean-to-lean group. Respective HRs for early-onset obesity-related cancers were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.20-1.47), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.60-1.31), and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.20-1.61). Each 5% weight gain conferred a 3% increased hazard (95% CI, 1.02-1.03), with a similar 3% increase for early-onset cancers (95% CI, 1.02-1.04). Cancer-specific risks included 3% (95% CI, 1.02-1.04) for postmenopausal breast cancer, 3% (95% CI, 1.01-1.04) for colorectal cancer, 4% (95% CI, 1.02-1.05) for thyroid cancer, 5% (95% CI, 1.04-1.07) for kidney cancer, and 8% (95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for uterine cancer. Some cancers, including leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, were not associated with weight gain but were positively associated with high adolescent BMI.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Maintaining a healthy BMI from adolescence to adulthood may reduce obesity-related cancer risk, including early-onset, highlighting the importance of early weight management strategies.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Novo Nordisk, Israel.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103711"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-03eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103723
Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Alisson M Paredes Naveda, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Marc N Potenza, Peter T Morgan, Gustavo A Angarita
Background: Sleep disturbances are common in individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs), often persisting beyond initial abstinence and hindering recovery. However, the underlying sleep abnormalities warrant further investigation, particularly given mixed findings regarding specific substances.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify sleep-related abnormalities associated with alcohol (AUD), benzodiazepine (BUD), cannabis (CaUD), cocaine (CoUD), methamphetamine (MUD), nicotine (NUD), and opioid (OUD) use disorders. We systematically searched Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until November 2025, following a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42024531160).
Findings: We conducted a systematic review of 43 eligible publications involving approximately 7500 participants, using both objective (eg, polysomnography) and subjective (eg, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) measures. Results showed that total sleep time (TST) was reduced in AUD (-14.32, 95% CI = -16.69 to -11.96; I2 = 0%), NUD (-0.33, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.06; I2 = 37%), and OUD (-38.16, 95% CI = -63.04 to -13.28; I2 = 0%). Slow-wave sleep (SWS) was reduced in AUD (-3.68, 95% CI -4.99 to 2.38; I2 = 73%) and CoUD (-30.69, 95% CI = -47.27 to -14.10; I2 = 90%). Sleep quality, measured by the PSQI, was poorer in AUD (4.89, 95% CI = 3.01 to 6.77; I2 = 98%), CoUD (0.98, 95% CI = 0.04-1.93; I2 = 0%) and NUD (2.64, 95% CI = 0.41-4.88; I2 = 96%). Results for CaUD could not be meta-analyzed due to scarcity of data. No study met criteria to be included for BUD or MUD.
Interpretation: These findings suggest specific relationships between specific addictive substances and sleep, highlight areas of convergence in these relationships, and indicate instances in which the same drug is related with both objective and subjective alterations. Further research is needed to explore further, at a meta-analytical level, relationships between sleep and specific substances.
Funding: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
背景:睡眠障碍在物质使用障碍(sud)患者中很常见,通常持续超过最初的戒断并阻碍康复。然而,潜在的睡眠异常值得进一步调查,特别是考虑到特定物质的混合发现。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定与酒精(AUD)、苯二氮卓类药物(BUD)、大麻(CaUD)、可卡因(CoUD)、甲基苯丙胺(MUD)、尼古丁(NUD)和阿片类药物(OUD)使用障碍相关的睡眠相关异常。我们系统地检索了Embase、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,直到2025年11月,遵循预先注册的协议(PROSPERO: CRD42024531160)。研究结果:我们采用客观(如多导睡眠图)和主观(如匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI])测量方法,对43篇符合条件的出版物进行了系统评价,涉及约7500名参与者。结果显示,总睡眠时间(TST)在AUD (-14.32, 95% CI = -16.69至-11.96;I2 = 0%)、NUD (-0.33, 95% CI = -0.59至-0.06;I2 = 37%)和OUD (-38.16, 95% CI = -63.04至-13.28;I2 = 0%)组均有所减少。慢波睡眠(SWS)在AUD (-3.68, 95% CI = -4.99至2.38;I2 = 73%)和CoUD (-30.69, 95% CI = -47.27至-14.10;I2 = 90%)中减少。由PSQI测量的睡眠质量在AUD (4.89, 95% CI = 3.01 - 6.77; I2 = 98%)、CoUD (0.98, 95% CI = 0.04-1.93; I2 = 0%)和NUD (2.64, 95% CI = 0.41-4.88; I2 = 96%)组较差。由于缺乏数据,不能对冠心病的结果进行meta分析。没有研究符合budd或MUD的标准。解释:这些发现表明了特定成瘾物质与睡眠之间的特定关系,突出了这些关系中的趋同领域,并指出了同一种药物与客观和主观改变相关的实例。需要进一步的研究,在元分析水平上进一步探索睡眠和特定物质之间的关系。资助:国家药物滥用研究所。
{"title":"Sleep alterations in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Alisson M Paredes Naveda, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Marc N Potenza, Peter T Morgan, Gustavo A Angarita","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103723","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disturbances are common in individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs), often persisting beyond initial abstinence and hindering recovery. However, the underlying sleep abnormalities warrant further investigation, particularly given mixed findings regarding specific substances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify sleep-related abnormalities associated with alcohol (AUD), benzodiazepine (BUD), cannabis (CaUD), cocaine (CoUD), methamphetamine (MUD), nicotine (NUD), and opioid (OUD) use disorders. We systematically searched Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until November 2025, following a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42024531160).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of 43 eligible publications involving approximately 7500 participants, using both objective (eg, polysomnography) and subjective (eg, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) measures. Results showed that total sleep time (TST) was reduced in AUD (-14.32, 95% CI = -16.69 to -11.96; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), NUD (-0.33, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.06; I<sup>2</sup> = 37%), and OUD (-38.16, 95% CI = -63.04 to -13.28; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Slow-wave sleep (SWS) was reduced in AUD (-3.68, 95% CI -4.99 to 2.38; I<sup>2</sup> = 73%) and CoUD (-30.69, 95% CI = -47.27 to -14.10; I<sup>2</sup> = 90%). Sleep quality, measured by the PSQI, was poorer in AUD (4.89, 95% CI = 3.01 to 6.77; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%), CoUD (0.98, 95% CI = 0.04-1.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and NUD (2.64, 95% CI = 0.41-4.88; I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). Results for CaUD could not be meta-analyzed due to scarcity of data. No study met criteria to be included for BUD or MUD.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These findings suggest specific relationships between specific addictive substances and sleep, highlight areas of convergence in these relationships, and indicate instances in which the same drug is related with both objective and subjective alterations. Further research is needed to explore further, at a meta-analytical level, relationships between sleep and specific substances.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute on Drug Abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103723"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805338/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-03eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103735
Brian Tangara, Hellen C Barsosio, Tegwen Marlais, Jean Moise T Kabore, Alfred B Tiono, Kephas Otieno, Miriam Wanjiku, Morine Achieng, Eric D Onyango, Everlyne D Ondieki, Henry Aura, Telesphorus Odawo, David J Allen, Luke Hannan, Kevin Ka Tetteh, Issiaka Soulama, Alphonse Ouedraogo, Samuel S Serme, Ben I Soulama, Aissata Barry, Emilie S Badoum, Julian Matthewman, Helena Brazal-Monzó, Jennifer Canizales, Anna Drabko, William Wu, Simon Kariuki, Maia Lesosky, Sodiomon B Sirima, Chris Drakeley, Feiko O Ter Kuile
<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unknown whether the choice of malaria treatment for uncomplicated malaria affects coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load, or duration of viral shedding. Several antimalarials exhibit antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 <i>in vitro</i> and have been suggested as potential therapeutic candidates for COVID-19, particularly pyronaridine-artesunate (PA), despite disappointing clinical results with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an open-label randomised trial comparing standard 3-day treatment with PA and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in newly diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients aged ≥6 months with rapid diagnostic test or microscopy-confirmed non-severe malaria in Kenya and Burkina Faso. SARS-CoV-2 was assessed by RT-PCR on days 3, 7, 14, and 28, and symptom resolution was assessed daily for 14 days using FLU-PRO Plus. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7. Secondary endpoints included SARS-CoV-2 clearance by days 14, 21, and 28, time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days, median viral load on day 7, and time to symptom resolution. Complete case analysis was conducted using log-binomial regression for binary outcomes, Cox-regression for time-to-event outcomes, and negative binomial regression for count outcomes, all adjusted for disease severity and viral load at enrolment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695197.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From January 2021 to January 2022, 143 participants were randomised (PA = 69, AL = 74, intention-to-treat [ITT] population), including 117 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed (PA = 58, AL = 59, modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population) and 26 with rapid-antigen test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 19 years (interquartile range [IQR] 13-38), 66% were aged ≥15 years. Baseline characteristics were comparable. SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7 (primary endpoint) was 41% (22/54) with PA versus 58% (33/57) with AL (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.35, p = 0.37); by day-14: PA = 80% (44/55) versus AL = 96% (55/57) (aRR = 0.86, 0.58-1.29, p = 0.47). Median (IQR) viral load on day 7 was higher with PA (855 [30-2883] versus AL:81 [12-209] copies/mL, p = 0.023). Time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days was slower with PA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.55, 0.37-0.83, p = 0.004). Time to symptom clearance between treatments was similar (aHR = 1.01, 0.91-1.13, p = 0.79). Parasitological cure rates by day 42 were PA = 100% and AL = 99%. Five serious adverse events occurred (PA = 2, AL = 3) in three participants (PA = 1, AL = 2), including three hospitalisations (PA = 1, AL = 2), resulting in two deaths, both from respiratory failure (PA = 1, AL = 1). No serious adverse events (SAEs) were cons
背景:目前尚不清楚非复杂性疟疾的疟疾治疗选择是否会影响冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)的严重程度、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)的病毒载量或病毒脱落的持续时间。几种抗疟药在体外表现出对SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒活性,并被认为是COVID-19的潜在治疗候选药物,特别是吡咯嘧啶-青蒿琥酯(PA),尽管氯喹和羟氯喹的临床结果令人失望。方法:我们进行了一项开放标签随机试验,比较了在肯尼亚和布基纳法索新诊断的年龄≥6个月的SARS-CoV-2感染快速诊断试验或显微镜下确诊的非严重疟疾患者中,PA和蒿甲醚-氨苯三嗪(AL)的标准3天治疗。在第3、7、14和28天通过RT-PCR评估SARS-CoV-2,并在14天内每天使用FLU-PRO Plus评估症状消退情况。主要终点是受试者在第7天清除SARS-CoV-2的比例。次要终点包括第14、21和28天的SARS-CoV-2清除,到28天内SARS-CoV-2清除的时间,第7天的中位病毒载量,以及到症状缓解的时间。对二元结果采用对数二项回归,对事件发生时间结果采用cox回归,对计数结果采用负二项回归进行完整的病例分析,所有分析均根据入组时的疾病严重程度和病毒载量进行调整。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT04695197。研究结果:从2021年1月至2022年1月,143名受试者被随机分组(PA = 69, AL = 74,意向治疗[ITT]人群),其中117人经逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确诊(PA = 58, AL = 59,意向治疗[mITT]人群),26人经快速抗原检测确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染。中位年龄为19岁(四分位间距[IQR] 13-38), 66%年龄≥15岁。基线特征具有可比性。第7天(主要终点),PA组的SARS-CoV-2清除率为41% (22/54),AL组为58%(33/57)(校正风险比[aRR] = 0.78, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.45-1.35, p = 0.37);第14天:PA = 80% (44/55), AL = 96% (55/57) (aRR = 0.86, 0.58-1.29, p = 0.47)。第7天PA组的中位病毒载量(IQR)较高(855 [30-2883],AL组为81[12-209]拷贝/mL, p = 0.023)。PA患者在28天内清除SARS-CoV-2的时间较慢(校正风险比[aHR]: 0.55, 0.37-0.83, p = 0.004)。两组治疗至症状消除的时间相似(aHR = 1.01, 0.91-1.13, p = 0.79)。第42天的寄生虫治愈率PA = 100%, AL = 99%。3名参与者(PA = 1, AL = 2)发生了5次严重不良事件(PA = 2, AL = 3),包括3次住院(PA = 1, AL = 2),导致2例死亡,均因呼吸衰竭(PA = 1, AL = 1)。没有严重不良事件(SAEs)被认为与治疗相关。解释:吡啶-青蒿琥酯在COVID-19合并疟疾患者中的病毒清除速度比用蒿甲醚-氨苯曲明标准治疗慢,但症状缓解相似。这两种治疗方法都是非常有效的抗疟药物,应继续考虑将其作为轻中度COVID-19患者无并发症疟疾的一线或二线治疗选择。资助:盖茨基金会。
{"title":"Artemether-lumefantrine versus pyronaridine-artesunate for the treatment of malaria in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 in Kenya and Burkina Faso: a randomised open-label trial (MALCOV).","authors":"Brian Tangara, Hellen C Barsosio, Tegwen Marlais, Jean Moise T Kabore, Alfred B Tiono, Kephas Otieno, Miriam Wanjiku, Morine Achieng, Eric D Onyango, Everlyne D Ondieki, Henry Aura, Telesphorus Odawo, David J Allen, Luke Hannan, Kevin Ka Tetteh, Issiaka Soulama, Alphonse Ouedraogo, Samuel S Serme, Ben I Soulama, Aissata Barry, Emilie S Badoum, Julian Matthewman, Helena Brazal-Monzó, Jennifer Canizales, Anna Drabko, William Wu, Simon Kariuki, Maia Lesosky, Sodiomon B Sirima, Chris Drakeley, Feiko O Ter Kuile","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103735","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103735","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unknown whether the choice of malaria treatment for uncomplicated malaria affects coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load, or duration of viral shedding. Several antimalarials exhibit antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 <i>in vitro</i> and have been suggested as potential therapeutic candidates for COVID-19, particularly pyronaridine-artesunate (PA), despite disappointing clinical results with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an open-label randomised trial comparing standard 3-day treatment with PA and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in newly diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients aged ≥6 months with rapid diagnostic test or microscopy-confirmed non-severe malaria in Kenya and Burkina Faso. SARS-CoV-2 was assessed by RT-PCR on days 3, 7, 14, and 28, and symptom resolution was assessed daily for 14 days using FLU-PRO Plus. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7. Secondary endpoints included SARS-CoV-2 clearance by days 14, 21, and 28, time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days, median viral load on day 7, and time to symptom resolution. Complete case analysis was conducted using log-binomial regression for binary outcomes, Cox-regression for time-to-event outcomes, and negative binomial regression for count outcomes, all adjusted for disease severity and viral load at enrolment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695197.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From January 2021 to January 2022, 143 participants were randomised (PA = 69, AL = 74, intention-to-treat [ITT] population), including 117 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed (PA = 58, AL = 59, modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population) and 26 with rapid-antigen test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 19 years (interquartile range [IQR] 13-38), 66% were aged ≥15 years. Baseline characteristics were comparable. SARS-CoV-2 clearance by day 7 (primary endpoint) was 41% (22/54) with PA versus 58% (33/57) with AL (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.35, p = 0.37); by day-14: PA = 80% (44/55) versus AL = 96% (55/57) (aRR = 0.86, 0.58-1.29, p = 0.47). Median (IQR) viral load on day 7 was higher with PA (855 [30-2883] versus AL:81 [12-209] copies/mL, p = 0.023). Time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance over 28 days was slower with PA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.55, 0.37-0.83, p = 0.004). Time to symptom clearance between treatments was similar (aHR = 1.01, 0.91-1.13, p = 0.79). Parasitological cure rates by day 42 were PA = 100% and AL = 99%. Five serious adverse events occurred (PA = 2, AL = 3) in three participants (PA = 1, AL = 2), including three hospitalisations (PA = 1, AL = 2), resulting in two deaths, both from respiratory failure (PA = 1, AL = 1). No serious adverse events (SAEs) were cons","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103735"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-02eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103714
Alessandro Prete, Verena Theiler-Schwetz, Wiebke Arlt, Jon Hazeldine, Irina-Oana Chifu, Birgit Harbeck, Catherine Napier, John D C Newell-Price, D Aled Rees, Nicole Reisch, Günter K Stalla, Helen Coope, Kerry Maltby, John Porter, Jo Quirke, Richard J Ross
Background: Cortisol has a circadian rhythm with an early morning rise, loss of this rhythm is associated with poor health. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that restoring the early morning cortisol rise will improve fatigue and quality of life (QoL) by comparing twice daily Chronocort with once daily Plenadren in patients with adrenal insufficiency.
Methods: A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study with no washout in 58 patients (29 in each arm) with primary adrenal insufficiency comparing four weeks' Chronocort, 15 mg at night and 10 mg in the morning, a formulation that restores early morning cortisol levels, with four weeks' once daily Plenadren 25 mg, which only restores daytime cortisol levels. The primary endpoint was the 07:00 h serum cortisol level and secondary endpoints measures of fatigue and QoL. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials Register (NCT NCT05222152; Eudract 2021-000144-21), initiated on 11th January 2022 and completed on 18th October 2023.
Findings: Patients met the primary endpoint and achieved a physiological early morning serum cortisol, median 417 nmol/L on Chronocort versus 6 nmol/L on Plenadren (P < 0.0001). For secondary outcomes the majority of QoL and fatigue measures showed significant benefits for Chronocort including the disease-specific questionnaire AddiQol (P = 0.02), the fatigue questionnaire PROMIS 7b (P = 0.02), SF-36 physical component score (P = 0.01), and EQ-5D-5L (P = 0.02). The Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) was not significantly different between treatments; however, a pre-specified sensitivity analysis showed that in the first treatment period, Chronocort reduced the MAF Score (P = 0.008), suggesting a carry-over effect from period 1 to 2. A post hoc analysis of immune profile in a subset of 19 patients showed that those on Chronocort had an increase in circulating number or frequency of neutrophils, natural killer and natural killer T cells compared to both baseline glucocorticoid treatment and Plenadren treatment.
Interpretation: Restoring the early morning cortisol levels with twice daily Chronocort 15 mg at night 10 mg in the morning improved health-related quality of life, fatigue and the immune profile compared with 25 mg daily Plenadren.
{"title":"Effects of modified release hydrocortisone on restoration of early morning cortisol, quality of life, and fatigue in adrenal insufficiency (The CHAMPAIN study): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study comparing Chronocort and Plenadren.","authors":"Alessandro Prete, Verena Theiler-Schwetz, Wiebke Arlt, Jon Hazeldine, Irina-Oana Chifu, Birgit Harbeck, Catherine Napier, John D C Newell-Price, D Aled Rees, Nicole Reisch, Günter K Stalla, Helen Coope, Kerry Maltby, John Porter, Jo Quirke, Richard J Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103714","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103714","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cortisol has a circadian rhythm with an early morning rise, loss of this rhythm is associated with poor health. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that restoring the early morning cortisol rise will improve fatigue and quality of life (QoL) by comparing twice daily Chronocort with once daily Plenadren in patients with adrenal insufficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study with no washout in 58 patients (29 in each arm) with primary adrenal insufficiency comparing four weeks' Chronocort, 15 mg at night and 10 mg in the morning, a formulation that restores early morning cortisol levels, with four weeks' once daily Plenadren 25 mg, which only restores daytime cortisol levels. The primary endpoint was the 07:00 h serum cortisol level and secondary endpoints measures of fatigue and QoL. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials Register (NCT NCT05222152; Eudract 2021-000144-21), initiated on 11th January 2022 and completed on 18th October 2023.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Patients met the primary endpoint and achieved a physiological early morning serum cortisol, median 417 nmol/L on Chronocort versus 6 nmol/L on Plenadren (P < 0.0001). For secondary outcomes the majority of QoL and fatigue measures showed significant benefits for Chronocort including the disease-specific questionnaire AddiQol (P = 0.02), the fatigue questionnaire PROMIS 7b (P = 0.02), SF-36 physical component score (P = 0.01), and EQ-5D-5L (P = 0.02). The Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) was not significantly different between treatments; however, a pre-specified sensitivity analysis showed that in the first treatment period, Chronocort reduced the MAF Score (P = 0.008), suggesting a carry-over effect from period 1 to 2. A post hoc analysis of immune profile in a subset of 19 patients showed that those on Chronocort had an increase in circulating number or frequency of neutrophils, natural killer and natural killer T cells compared to both baseline glucocorticoid treatment and Plenadren treatment.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Restoring the early morning cortisol levels with twice daily Chronocort 15 mg at night 10 mg in the morning improved health-related quality of life, fatigue and the immune profile compared with 25 mg daily Plenadren.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Neurocrine UK Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103714"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103720
Will Conabere, Francesca Lami, Hannah Andrews, Mary Skarlatos, Carmen C Pace, Pip Buckingham, Sam Hay, Tahlia De Ieso, Ken C Pang, Michelle A Tollit
Background: Social transition can be an important and accessible aspect of gender affirmation, allowing trans and gender diverse young people to authentically express their identities, including through adoption of chosen name, pronouns, and changes to appearance. These changes may take place in a single context, such as at home, or across multiple settings, including school, with friends, and online. Currently, it is unclear how this process is being captured in the literature, including whether it has been measured comprehensively and consistently.
Methods: This scoping review (PROSPERO: CRD42022333058) explored how social transition has been defined and operationalised in studies involving trans young people (under 18), detailing practices (i.e. specific changes) of social transition and contexts where these changes occurred. Systematic searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo databases to August 2025. Studies were eligible if they included a definition and/or measure of social transition.
Findings: Among 40 included studies, definitions (n = 37 studies) and measures (n = 29 studies) varied widely. Some studies did not distinguish between specific practices of social transition, such as changes to name, pronouns, or appearance, when defining (4/37) and measuring (6/29) the construct. However, many studies omitted reference to the contexts in which these practices occurred (19/37 definitions; 14/29 measures), assuming practices took place uniformly across all contexts. Many also relied on a binary measure of social transition (15/29 measures), failing to capture the diverse ways in which individuals enact their social transition. No measurement tools were used consistently.
Interpretation: Current definitions and measures of social transition in research with trans and gender diverse young people are inconsistent and incomplete. As a result, they fail to capture the complex nature of social transition, limiting comparability between studies and hindering understanding of its complexities and impacts. Comprehensive, standardised measures to capture this concept are urgently required.
Funding: There was no funding source for this study.
{"title":"Operationalising social transition in trans and gender diverse youth: a scoping review of definitions and measures.","authors":"Will Conabere, Francesca Lami, Hannah Andrews, Mary Skarlatos, Carmen C Pace, Pip Buckingham, Sam Hay, Tahlia De Ieso, Ken C Pang, Michelle A Tollit","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103720","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social transition can be an important and accessible aspect of gender affirmation, allowing trans and gender diverse young people to authentically express their identities, including through adoption of chosen name, pronouns, and changes to appearance. These changes may take place in a single context, such as at home, or across multiple settings, including school, with friends, and online. Currently, it is unclear how this process is being captured in the literature, including whether it has been measured comprehensively and consistently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review (PROSPERO: CRD42022333058) explored how social transition has been defined and operationalised in studies involving trans young people (under 18), detailing practices (i.e. specific changes) of social transition and contexts where these changes occurred. Systematic searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo databases to August 2025. Studies were eligible if they included a definition and/or measure of social transition.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 40 included studies, definitions (n = 37 studies) and measures (n = 29 studies) varied widely. Some studies did not distinguish between specific practices of social transition, such as changes to name, pronouns, or appearance, when defining (4/37) and measuring (6/29) the construct. However, many studies omitted reference to the contexts in which these practices occurred (19/37 definitions; 14/29 measures), assuming practices took place uniformly across all contexts. Many also relied on a binary measure of social transition (15/29 measures), failing to capture the diverse ways in which individuals enact their social transition. No measurement tools were used consistently.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Current definitions and measures of social transition in research with trans and gender diverse young people are inconsistent and incomplete. As a result, they fail to capture the complex nature of social transition, limiting comparability between studies and hindering understanding of its complexities and impacts. Comprehensive, standardised measures to capture this concept are urgently required.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>There was no funding source for this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103720"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-30eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103725
Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani, Hans M Westgeest, Timothée Olivier
Three different PARP (Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase)-inhibitors have been approved in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Regulatory authorities, however, have divergent opinions. Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has limited approval of two PARP-inhibitors to patients with BRCA mutations or other alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved the indication for the overall mCRPC population, irrespective of HRR status. Of all trials, only MAGNITUDE, evaluating niraparib and abiraterone, led to aligned conclusions from both the EMA and FDA, as its design effectively identified the subgroup most likely to benefit. The discrepancies observed in the assessment of the other two trials stem from limitations in their designs. A key issue with PROpel is the lack of patient stratification based on known biomarkers, and the subgroup analysis is underpowered. In TALAPRO-2, although an enriched cohort is included, combining these data with the all-comers cohort results in a potentially misleading conclusion. Currently, there is a need for harmonisation in biomarker-driven trial designs and the definition of homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD). Access to biomarker and clinical data from all PARP-inhibitor trials would allow researchers to clarify the impact of different HRR mutations on outcomes.
{"title":"Twelve mutations, three trials, and five different labels: PARP inhibitors regulatory inconsistencies in prostate cancers.","authors":"Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani, Hans M Westgeest, Timothée Olivier","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103725","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103725","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three different PARP (Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase)-inhibitors have been approved in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Regulatory authorities, however, have divergent opinions. Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has limited approval of two PARP-inhibitors to patients with <i>BRCA</i> mutations or other alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved the indication for the overall mCRPC population, irrespective of HRR status. Of all trials, only MAGNITUDE, evaluating niraparib and abiraterone, led to aligned conclusions from both the EMA and FDA, as its design effectively identified the subgroup most likely to benefit. The discrepancies observed in the assessment of the other two trials stem from limitations in their designs. A key issue with PROpel is the lack of patient stratification based on known biomarkers, and the subgroup analysis is underpowered. In TALAPRO-2, although an enriched cohort is included, combining these data with the all-comers cohort results in a potentially misleading conclusion. Currently, there is a need for harmonisation in biomarker-driven trial designs and the definition of homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD). Access to biomarker and clinical data from all PARP-inhibitor trials would allow researchers to clarify the impact of different HRR mutations on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103725"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804155/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-30eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103721
Anna Gage, Madeleine Conrad, Chiara Sumich, Wes Warriner, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Corinne Bintz, Kelly Bienhoff, Jessica Bishai, Rakhi Dandona, Mae Ashworth Dirac, Thomas Glucksman, Simon I Hay, Megan Knight, Rafael Lozano, Ali H Mokdad, Abdu Mohiddin, Bancy Ngatia, Marie-Jeanne Offosse, Jamilu Tukur, Marleen Temmerman, Bridget Stollfus, Asnake Worku, Enis Barış, Nicholas J Kassebaum, Annie Haakenstad
Background: With major increases in facility births in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) since 1995, a key question is what types of facilities met the increased demand. Understanding the evolving delivery landscape is crucial to informing debates about optimal models for balancing access, quality, and equity. We studied the distribution of delivery location by health facility level and sector (private versus public) in 130 LMICs from 1995 to 2023.
Methods: We used 745 data sources with delivery location information in our analysis. We first categorised births as in-facility or not, then further classified facility births by level (hospital or lower-level) and sector (public or private). We used spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression to model the share of births by facility type from 1995 to 2023 and compared delivery patterns to development and health indicators.
Findings: In 2023, 47.5% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 46.4-48.6) of deliveries in LMICs were in public hospitals, 19.2% (18.3-20.2) were in private hospitals, 13.0% (12.3-13.8) were in lower-level public facilities, 2.0% (1.9-2.2) were in private lower-level facilities, and the remaining 18.2% (17.3-19.2) were outside health facilities. In 106 countries, more than half of deliveries were in public hospitals, while in 12 countries, public lower-level facilities provided care for more than half of births. In only two countries were private hospitals used for more than half of births, while in the remaining ten countries no facility type provided the majority of care. Between 1995 and 2023, nearly two-thirds (62.1%) of the 41.0 percentage-point increase in facility births was borne by public hospitals. Delivery in lower-level facilities was more common in countries with lower levels of development and higher neonatal mortality rates.
Interpretation: The mix of delivery locations represents the diversity of health systems worldwide. Our analysis highlights the pivotal and growing role of public hospitals in delivery care, though public lower-level delivery care is common in high-mortality contexts. Policy makers should account for the facility mix and the complex roles of public and private sectors when designing strategies to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.
{"title":"Location of births by health facility type: a time trend analysis from 1995 to 2023 in 130 low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Anna Gage, Madeleine Conrad, Chiara Sumich, Wes Warriner, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Corinne Bintz, Kelly Bienhoff, Jessica Bishai, Rakhi Dandona, Mae Ashworth Dirac, Thomas Glucksman, Simon I Hay, Megan Knight, Rafael Lozano, Ali H Mokdad, Abdu Mohiddin, Bancy Ngatia, Marie-Jeanne Offosse, Jamilu Tukur, Marleen Temmerman, Bridget Stollfus, Asnake Worku, Enis Barış, Nicholas J Kassebaum, Annie Haakenstad","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103721","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With major increases in facility births in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) since 1995, a key question is what types of facilities met the increased demand. Understanding the evolving delivery landscape is crucial to informing debates about optimal models for balancing access, quality, and equity. We studied the distribution of delivery location by health facility level and sector (private versus public) in 130 LMICs from 1995 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 745 data sources with delivery location information in our analysis. We first categorised births as in-facility or not, then further classified facility births by level (hospital or lower-level) and sector (public or private). We used spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression to model the share of births by facility type from 1995 to 2023 and compared delivery patterns to development and health indicators.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 2023, 47.5% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 46.4-48.6) of deliveries in LMICs were in public hospitals, 19.2% (18.3-20.2) were in private hospitals, 13.0% (12.3-13.8) were in lower-level public facilities, 2.0% (1.9-2.2) were in private lower-level facilities, and the remaining 18.2% (17.3-19.2) were outside health facilities. In 106 countries, more than half of deliveries were in public hospitals, while in 12 countries, public lower-level facilities provided care for more than half of births. In only two countries were private hospitals used for more than half of births, while in the remaining ten countries no facility type provided the majority of care. Between 1995 and 2023, nearly two-thirds (62.1%) of the 41.0 percentage-point increase in facility births was borne by public hospitals. Delivery in lower-level facilities was more common in countries with lower levels of development and higher neonatal mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The mix of delivery locations represents the diversity of health systems worldwide. Our analysis highlights the pivotal and growing role of public hospitals in delivery care, though public lower-level delivery care is common in high-mortality contexts. Policy makers should account for the facility mix and the complex roles of public and private sectors when designing strategies to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Gates Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103721"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804159/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103728
Tom Ockhuisen, Alexandra de Nooy, Sarah Girdwood, Megan A Hansen, Mikashmi Kohli, Morten Ruhwald, Nazir Ismail, Brooke E Nichols
Background: Despite progress in reducing global tuberculosis (TB) incidence, ongoing funding disruptions threaten to reverse gains. Timely, accurate diagnosis integrated with rapid treatment is critical to reducing morbidity, mortality, and transmission-but remains costly, particularly for decentralized approaches. As global health budgets tighten, identifying the optimal cost for molecular TB diagnostics instruments is critical to inform scale-up decisions.
Methods: We developed a probabilistic patient pathway model to assess the cost-effectiveness of decentralizing TB testing across primary healthcare facilities in high-burden settings. Scenarios varied by facility testing density (low, medium, high) and anticipated testing volume increases (none, partial, full). We included the effects of instrument downtime and calculated the maximum instrument + warranty prices at which fully decentralized testing would be considered cost-effective at a $500/disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted threshold.
Findings: Decentralization with increased testing averted up to 23% more DALYs than centralized testing but was not cost-effective at current instrument + warranty prices. Partial decentralization to the largest 20% of facilities approached cost-effectiveness (<$1000/DALY) with full testing increase. For full decentralization to meet the $500/DALY threshold, maximum viable instrument + warranty prices for low-throughput instruments ranged from $0 (no uptake increase) to $410-$6048 (increased testing uptake, low- to high-testing density settings).
Interpretation: At current prices, decentralized molecular TB testing is unlikely to be cost-effective, even with improved uptake, systemwide. However, meaningful reductions in instrument + warranty costs could make both full and partial decentralization viable. As countries face tighter budgets, clear price targets for cost-effectiveness can help guide procurement and investment decisions in TB diagnostics.
Funding: BMGF, Willem Bakhuys Roozenboomstichting.
背景:尽管在减少全球结核病发病率方面取得了进展,但持续的资金中断有可能使成果逆转。及时、准确的诊断与快速治疗相结合对于降低发病率、死亡率和传播至关重要,但成本仍然很高,特别是对于分散的方法。随着全球卫生预算收紧,确定结核分子诊断仪器的最佳成本对于为扩大规模的决策提供信息至关重要。方法:我们开发了一个概率患者路径模型,以评估在高负担环境中分散在初级卫生保健机构进行结核病检测的成本效益。场景因设施测试密度(低、中、高)和预期测试量增加(无、部分、全部)而异。我们考虑了仪器停机的影响,并计算了仪器+保修的最高价格,在500美元/残疾调整生命年(DALY)避免阈值下,完全分散测试将被认为具有成本效益。研究结果:与集中检测相比,增加检测的分散化可避免高达23%的DALYs,但在当前仪器+保修价格下并不具有成本效益。部分分散到最大的20%的设施接近成本效益(解释:以目前的价格,分散的结核病分子检测不太可能具有成本效益,即使在全系统范围内的吸收得到改善。然而,有意义地减少工具和保修成本可以使完全和部分权力下放变得可行。由于各国面临预算紧缩,明确的成本效益价格目标有助于指导结核病诊断的采购和投资决策。资助:BMGF, Willem Bakhuys Roozenboomstichting。
{"title":"Cost and impact of decentralized tuberculosis testing: a modeling analysis of price thresholds for molecular instruments in high-burden settings.","authors":"Tom Ockhuisen, Alexandra de Nooy, Sarah Girdwood, Megan A Hansen, Mikashmi Kohli, Morten Ruhwald, Nazir Ismail, Brooke E Nichols","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103728","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103728","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite progress in reducing global tuberculosis (TB) incidence, ongoing funding disruptions threaten to reverse gains. Timely, accurate diagnosis integrated with rapid treatment is critical to reducing morbidity, mortality, and transmission-but remains costly, particularly for decentralized approaches. As global health budgets tighten, identifying the optimal cost for molecular TB diagnostics instruments is critical to inform scale-up decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a probabilistic patient pathway model to assess the cost-effectiveness of decentralizing TB testing across primary healthcare facilities in high-burden settings. Scenarios varied by facility testing density (low, medium, high) and anticipated testing volume increases (none, partial, full). We included the effects of instrument downtime and calculated the maximum instrument + warranty prices at which fully decentralized testing would be considered cost-effective at a $500/disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted threshold.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Decentralization with increased testing averted up to 23% more DALYs than centralized testing but was not cost-effective at current instrument + warranty prices. Partial decentralization to the largest 20% of facilities approached cost-effectiveness (<$1000/DALY) with full testing increase. For full decentralization to meet the $500/DALY threshold, maximum viable instrument + warranty prices for low-throughput instruments ranged from $0 (no uptake increase) to $410-$6048 (increased testing uptake, low- to high-testing density settings).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>At current prices, decentralized molecular TB testing is unlikely to be cost-effective, even with improved uptake, systemwide. However, meaningful reductions in instrument + warranty costs could make both full and partial decentralization viable. As countries face tighter budgets, clear price targets for cost-effectiveness can help guide procurement and investment decisions in TB diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>BMGF, Willem Bakhuys Roozenboomstichting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103728"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103724
Silvia Ciancia, Jeroen Vervalcke, Daniel Klink, Guy T'Sjoen, Martine Cools
Background: The number of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) minors seeking medical care continues to increase, however data on long-term effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) started in adolescence remain limited.
Methods: This single center study (Ghent University Hospital, Belgium) included a cohort of TGD individuals registered female at birth (RFAB, n = 91) and registered male at birth (RMAB, n = 26) who commenced GAHT during adolescence and were followed into adulthood for up to 10 years. Participants were enrolled retrospectively between September 2023 and December 2024. Outcomes assessed cross-sectionally included areal bone mineral density (aBMD), body composition, handgrip strength, and overall life satisfaction. Lifestyle factors such as alcohol and tobacco use, illicit drug use, and physical inactivity were also examined. Retrospective longitudinal data on aBMD and body composition from the start of medical gender-affirming treatment to the moment of study participation were also analyzed.
Findings: Median age at start of GAHT 17.2 (1.7) years for RFAB, 17.0 (2.2) years for RMAB; median GAHT duration at the enrollment 6.0 (2.4) years and 6.6 (3.4) years, respectively. aBMD z-scores remained within the normal range for both RFAB and RMAB participants, with scores aligning more closely to sex registered at birth (SRAB) in RFAB, and to affirmed gender (AG) in RMAB participants. Bone density was influenced by BMI, vitamin D levels, and smoking status, with those who had received GnRH agonists showing lower aBMD at specific sites. No pathological fractures were reported. Body composition shifted toward AG-typical fat and lean mass distribution, with some RFAB individuals exhibiting elevated visceral fat area. Handgrip strength in RFAB participants approached cisgender male reference values, while RMAB individuals showed intermediate values. Psychosocial outcomes indicated generally good self-rated health and life satisfaction, although a subset of participants, particularly among RMAB, reported lower life satisfaction.
Interpretation: Long-term GAHT initiated during adolescence promotes alignment of bone density, body composition, and muscle strength consistent with gender identity, without evidence of clinically significant adverse effects. Modifiable lifestyle factors remain important determinants of skeletal health. Overall, participants reported good general health and life satisfaction.
Funding: This work was supported by a project grant from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; GE065819N).
背景:寻求医疗保健的跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)未成年人的数量继续增加,然而,关于从青春期开始的性别确认激素治疗(GAHT)的长期效果的数据仍然有限。方法:这项单中心研究(比利时根特大学医院)纳入了一组TGD患者,其中出生时登记为女性(RFAB, n = 91)和出生时登记为男性(RMAB, n = 26),他们在青春期开始接受GAHT治疗,随访至成年期长达10年。参与者在2023年9月至2024年12月期间进行了回顾性登记。横断面评估的结果包括面骨矿物质密度(aBMD)、身体组成、握力和总体生活满意度。生活方式因素,如酒精和烟草使用、非法药物使用和缺乏身体活动也进行了检查。还分析了从医学性别肯定治疗开始到参与研究一刻的aBMD和身体成分的回顾性纵向数据。研究结果:治疗开始时,RFAB组的中位年龄为17.2(1.7)岁,RMAB组为17.0(2.2)岁;入组时的中位gaat持续时间分别为6.0(2.4)年和6.6(3.4)年。RFAB和RMAB参与者的aBMD z分数保持在正常范围内,RFAB参与者的分数与出生时登记的性别(SRAB)和RMAB参与者的确认性别(AG)更接近。骨密度受BMI、维生素D水平和吸烟状况的影响,接受GnRH激动剂的患者在特定部位表现出较低的aBMD。无病理性骨折报告。身体组成转向ag典型的脂肪和瘦肉质量分布,一些RFAB个体表现出内脏脂肪面积升高。RFAB参与者的握力接近顺性别男性参考值,而RMAB个体的握力为中间值。社会心理结果表明,总体上自我评价的健康和生活满意度良好,尽管一部分参与者,特别是RMAB参与者报告的生活满意度较低。解释:在青春期开始的长期GAHT促进骨密度、身体组成和肌肉力量与性别认同一致,没有临床显著不良反应的证据。可改变的生活方式因素仍然是骨骼健康的重要决定因素。总体而言,参与者报告了良好的总体健康状况和生活满意度。本研究由佛兰德斯研究基金会(FWO; GE065819N)项目资助。
{"title":"Effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy from adolescence to adulthood on bone mineral density, body composition and muscle strength.","authors":"Silvia Ciancia, Jeroen Vervalcke, Daniel Klink, Guy T'Sjoen, Martine Cools","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103724","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) minors seeking medical care continues to increase, however data on long-term effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) started in adolescence remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single center study (Ghent University Hospital, Belgium) included a cohort of TGD individuals registered female at birth (RFAB, n = 91) and registered male at birth (RMAB, n = 26) who commenced GAHT during adolescence and were followed into adulthood for up to 10 years. Participants were enrolled retrospectively between September 2023 and December 2024. Outcomes assessed cross-sectionally included areal bone mineral density (aBMD), body composition, handgrip strength, and overall life satisfaction. Lifestyle factors such as alcohol and tobacco use, illicit drug use, and physical inactivity were also examined. Retrospective longitudinal data on aBMD and body composition from the start of medical gender-affirming treatment to the moment of study participation were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Median age at start of GAHT 17.2 (1.7) years for RFAB, 17.0 (2.2) years for RMAB; median GAHT duration at the enrollment 6.0 (2.4) years and 6.6 (3.4) years, respectively. aBMD z-scores remained within the normal range for both RFAB and RMAB participants, with scores aligning more closely to sex registered at birth (SRAB) in RFAB, and to affirmed gender (AG) in RMAB participants. Bone density was influenced by BMI, vitamin D levels, and smoking status, with those who had received GnRH agonists showing lower aBMD at specific sites. No pathological fractures were reported. Body composition shifted toward AG-typical fat and lean mass distribution, with some RFAB individuals exhibiting elevated visceral fat area. Handgrip strength in RFAB participants approached cisgender male reference values, while RMAB individuals showed intermediate values. Psychosocial outcomes indicated generally good self-rated health and life satisfaction, although a subset of participants, particularly among RMAB, reported lower life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Long-term GAHT initiated during adolescence promotes alignment of bone density, body composition, and muscle strength consistent with gender identity, without evidence of clinically significant adverse effects. Modifiable lifestyle factors remain important determinants of skeletal health. Overall, participants reported good general health and life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by a project grant from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; GE065819N).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103724"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803899/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103729
Shahin Hallaj, Anna Heinke, Fritz Gerald P Kalaw, Nayoon Gim, Marian Blazes, Julia Owen, Eamon Dysinger, Erik S Benton, Benjamin A Cordier, Nicholas G Evans, Jennifer Li-Pook-Than, Michael P Snyder, Camille Nebeker, Linda M Zangwill, Sally L Baxter, Shannon McWeeney, Cecilia S Lee, Aaron Y Lee, Bhavesh Patel
Sharing clinical research data is key for increasing the pace of medical discoveries that improve human health. However, concern about study participants' privacy, confidentiality, and safety is a major factor that deters researchers from openly sharing clinical data even after deidentification. This concern is further enhanced by the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that pose an ever-increasing threat to the reidentification of study participants. Here, we discuss the challenges AI approaches create that are blurring the lines between identifiable, and non-identifiable data. We present a concept of pseudo-reidentification, and discuss how these challenges provide opportunities for rethinking open data sharing practices in clinical research. We highlight the novel open data sharing approach we have established as part of the AI-READI (Artificial Intelligence Ready, and Exploratory Atlas for Diabetes Insights) project, one of the four Data Generation Projects funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund's Bridge2AI Program.
{"title":"Navigating open data sharing and privacy in the age of clinical AI research: from reidentification to pseudo-reidentification.","authors":"Shahin Hallaj, Anna Heinke, Fritz Gerald P Kalaw, Nayoon Gim, Marian Blazes, Julia Owen, Eamon Dysinger, Erik S Benton, Benjamin A Cordier, Nicholas G Evans, Jennifer Li-Pook-Than, Michael P Snyder, Camille Nebeker, Linda M Zangwill, Sally L Baxter, Shannon McWeeney, Cecilia S Lee, Aaron Y Lee, Bhavesh Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103729","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103729","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sharing clinical research data is key for increasing the pace of medical discoveries that improve human health. However, concern about study participants' privacy, confidentiality, and safety is a major factor that deters researchers from openly sharing clinical data even after deidentification. This concern is further enhanced by the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that pose an ever-increasing threat to the reidentification of study participants. Here, we discuss the challenges AI approaches create that are blurring the lines between identifiable, and non-identifiable data. We present a concept of pseudo-reidentification, and discuss how these challenges provide opportunities for rethinking open data sharing practices in clinical research. We highlight the novel open data sharing approach we have established as part of the AI-READI (Artificial Intelligence Ready, and Exploratory Atlas for Diabetes Insights) project, one of the four Data Generation Projects funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund's Bridge2AI Program.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103729"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803850/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}