Pub Date : 2026-03-10eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103820
Severine Vermeire, Jessica R Allegretti, Hyo Jong Kim, Millie D Long, Jaroslaw Leszczyszyn, Stefan Schreiber, Jaroslaw Kierkus, Paulette D Chandler, Jyoti Ramakrishna, Elena Peeva, Michael S Vincent, Negin Shojaee, Ping Mahling, Christopher Banfield, Anindita Banerjee, Jeremy D Gale, Kenneth E Hung
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crohn's disease (CD) has a high unmet need for treatment. Ritlecitinib (Janus Kinase [JAK]3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [TEC] family kinase inhibitor) or brepocitinib (tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)/JAK1 inhibitor) are promising therapeutic targets. We aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PIZZICATO was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, induction-maintenance, phase 2a study in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD. Eligible patients (18-75 years old) had an established diagnosis (endoscopic and histopathology) of ileal, ileocolonic, or colonic active CD at least 3 months before the study started and had documented treatment failure with at least one conventional CD therapy. This study was double-blind during the 12-week induction phase and was open label for the subsequent 52-week open-label extension (OLE) phase. Study participants were enrolled from 140 sites in 26 countries and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive once-daily oral ritlecitinib (200 mg [8 weeks] followed by 50 mg [4 weeks]) or brepocitinib (60 mg [12 weeks]) or placebo in the induction phase, followed by a reduced dose of 50 mg ritlecitinib or 30 mg brepocitinib during the 52-week OLE phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved Simple Endoscopic Score (SES) for CD (SES-CD 50; defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline) at Week 12 (ritlecitinib versus placebo; brepocitinib versus placebo), and was assessed in the full analysis set (FAS; all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug or placebo). The primary endpoint was changed from clinically-meaningful endoscopic improvement (CMEI) by protocol amendment during study execution. The safety profile of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib was assessed as a secondary endpoint during the induction phase and as a primary endpoint during the OLE phase. Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (SAS; same as FAS). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395184, and EudraCT, 2017-003359-43.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Feb 2, 2018, and Oct 19, 2023, 244 patients (median age: 33.0 [18, 71]) were randomly allocated into study groups (ritlecitinib n = 93; brepocitinib n = 72; placebo n = 79) and included in the FAS and SAS. Of 244 participants dosed in the induction phase, 217 (88.9%) completed the induction phase and entered the OLE phase; 216 were dosed in the OLE phase. Disease activity was generally similar across groups and the majority of participants were tumour necrotizing factor (TNF) inhibitor experienced. For the primary outcome at Week 12, a significantly higher proportion of participants achieved SES-CD 50 with ritlecitinib (difference versus placebo: 14.3% [90% CI 4.0-24.5]; p = 0.012) or brepoc
背景:克罗恩病(CD)有很高的未满足的治疗需求。Ritlecitinib (Janus Kinase [JAK]3/酪氨酸激酶表达于肝细胞癌[TEC]家族激酶抑制剂)或brepocitinib(酪氨酸激酶2 (TYK2)/JAK1抑制剂)是有希望的治疗靶点。我们的目的是评估利来替尼和布雷波西替尼与安慰剂在中重度活动性cd患者中的疗效、安全性、药代动力学和药效学。PIZZICATO是一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、平行组、诱导维持、2a期研究,研究对象为中度至重度活动性CD患者。符合条件的患者(18-75岁)在研究开始前至少3个月有明确的回肠、回肠结肠或结肠活动性CD诊断(内镜和组织病理学),并且至少有一种常规CD治疗失败的记录。该研究在12周诱导期为双盲,随后的52周开放标签延长期(OLE)为开放标签期。研究参与者来自26个国家的140个地点,随机分配(1:1:1),在诱导期接受每日一次口服利来替尼(200 mg[8周],随后50 mg[4周])或布雷波西替尼(60 mg[12周])或安慰剂,随后在52周OLE期减少剂量50 mg利来替尼或30 mg布雷波西替尼。主要疗效终点是在第12周(利来替尼vs安慰剂;布雷波西替尼vs安慰剂)达到CD简单内镜评分(SES)的患者比例(SES-CD 50;定义为比基线减少≥50%),并在完整分析集(FAS;所有接受至少一剂量研究药物或安慰剂的参与者)中进行评估。在研究执行期间,通过方案修改,主要终点从有临床意义的内窥镜改善(CMEI)改变。利来替尼和布雷波替尼的安全性在诱导期作为次要终点,在OLE期作为主要终点进行评估。安全性评价采用安全分析集(SAS,同FAS)。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03395184, EudraCT号为2017-003359-43。结果:在2018年2月2日至2023年10月19日期间,244例患者(中位年龄:33.0岁[18,71])被随机分配到研究组(ritlecitinib n = 93; brepocitinib n = 72;安慰剂n = 79),并纳入FAS和SAS。在诱导期给药的244名参与者中,217名(88.9%)完成了诱导期并进入OLE期;在OLE期给药216例。疾病活动在各组之间大致相似,大多数参与者都经历过肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂。在第12周的主要结局中,利来替尼(与安慰剂的差异:14.3% [90% CI 4.0-24.5]; p = 0.012)或布雷西替尼(21.4% [10.0-32.9];p = 0.0012)达到SES-CD 50的参与者比例显著高于接受安慰剂的参与者。在安全性方面,在诱导阶段,146例(59.8%)患者报告了334例治疗不良事件(teae);在OLE期,169例(78.2%)患者报告了521次teae。大多数teae是轻度或中度的。最常见的是严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)检测阳性(6例,6.5%)。在瑞来替尼200/50 mg组,布雷波替尼组在诱导期出现头痛(5例,6.9%),安慰剂组出现潜在CD恶化(8例,10.1%);在OLE期,利来替尼200/50 mg至50 mg组(12例,14.3%)和布雷波西替尼60 mg至30 mg组(11例,17.2%)和SARS-CoV-2感染组(6例,16.7%)的潜在CD恶化。没有死亡报告。解释:与安慰剂相比,瑞来替尼和布雷波西替尼治疗中重度活动性CD的主要结局有显著改善,具有可接受的安全性。这应被视为有效性的初步证据。目前尚不清楚这些治疗方法对病情较轻的患者可能有多有效。需要对这两种分子进行进一步的研究,并更好地了解应答者和非应答者群体。融资:辉瑞公司
{"title":"Once-daily oral ritlecitinib or brepocitinib versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severely active Crohn's disease (PIZZICATO): an international, randomised, phase 2a trial.","authors":"Severine Vermeire, Jessica R Allegretti, Hyo Jong Kim, Millie D Long, Jaroslaw Leszczyszyn, Stefan Schreiber, Jaroslaw Kierkus, Paulette D Chandler, Jyoti Ramakrishna, Elena Peeva, Michael S Vincent, Negin Shojaee, Ping Mahling, Christopher Banfield, Anindita Banerjee, Jeremy D Gale, Kenneth E Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crohn's disease (CD) has a high unmet need for treatment. Ritlecitinib (Janus Kinase [JAK]3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [TEC] family kinase inhibitor) or brepocitinib (tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)/JAK1 inhibitor) are promising therapeutic targets. We aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PIZZICATO was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, induction-maintenance, phase 2a study in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD. Eligible patients (18-75 years old) had an established diagnosis (endoscopic and histopathology) of ileal, ileocolonic, or colonic active CD at least 3 months before the study started and had documented treatment failure with at least one conventional CD therapy. This study was double-blind during the 12-week induction phase and was open label for the subsequent 52-week open-label extension (OLE) phase. Study participants were enrolled from 140 sites in 26 countries and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive once-daily oral ritlecitinib (200 mg [8 weeks] followed by 50 mg [4 weeks]) or brepocitinib (60 mg [12 weeks]) or placebo in the induction phase, followed by a reduced dose of 50 mg ritlecitinib or 30 mg brepocitinib during the 52-week OLE phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved Simple Endoscopic Score (SES) for CD (SES-CD 50; defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline) at Week 12 (ritlecitinib versus placebo; brepocitinib versus placebo), and was assessed in the full analysis set (FAS; all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug or placebo). The primary endpoint was changed from clinically-meaningful endoscopic improvement (CMEI) by protocol amendment during study execution. The safety profile of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib was assessed as a secondary endpoint during the induction phase and as a primary endpoint during the OLE phase. Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (SAS; same as FAS). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395184, and EudraCT, 2017-003359-43.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Feb 2, 2018, and Oct 19, 2023, 244 patients (median age: 33.0 [18, 71]) were randomly allocated into study groups (ritlecitinib n = 93; brepocitinib n = 72; placebo n = 79) and included in the FAS and SAS. Of 244 participants dosed in the induction phase, 217 (88.9%) completed the induction phase and entered the OLE phase; 216 were dosed in the OLE phase. Disease activity was generally similar across groups and the majority of participants were tumour necrotizing factor (TNF) inhibitor experienced. For the primary outcome at Week 12, a significantly higher proportion of participants achieved SES-CD 50 with ritlecitinib (difference versus placebo: 14.3% [90% CI 4.0-24.5]; p = 0.012) or brepoc","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103820"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995499/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147480136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-10eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103822
Julian Gutzeit, Martin Weiß, Thomas Bahmer, Wolfgang Lieb, Stefan Schreiber, J Janne Vehreschild, Carolin Nürnberger, Sina M Pütz, Ekaterina Heim, Anne-Kathrin Ruß, Astrid Dempfle, Michael Krawczak, Susanne Poick, Anna Schäfer, Caroline Morbach, Clara Lehmann, M Cristina Polidori, Jens-Peter Reese, Thomas Zoller, Lilian Krist, Jan Heyckendorf, Lennart Michel Reinke, Jürgen Deckert, Grit Hein
Background: Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) affects many survivors with varying symptom profiles driven by acute disease severity (PCS-S) or individual resilience (PCS-R). While cross-sectional studies have identified risk factors and gender differences, long-term trajectories remain unclear. This study investigates the stability and progression of PCS-S and PCS-R scores after 9, 24 and 36 months from initial diagnosis, identifying key predictive factors stratified by gender.
Methods: We analyzed data from 1526 participants of the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON), modeling symptom-based PCS-score trajectories over time with linear mixed-effects models. Data were split into training (n = 944), test (n = 233), and two-site external validation (n = 349) sets. Gender-stratified elastic-net regression used nine-month clinical and psychosocial measures to predict PCS scores at 24 and 36 months. All data were collected between November 2020 and February 2024. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04679584) and in the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00023742).
Findings: PCS-S and PCS-R scores showed small but significant declines between 9 and 36 months (β = -0.054 and -0.065, respectively; p < 0.001), indicating persistent symptom burden despite gradual improvement. Predictive models explained 16.7-52.6% of variance in later PCS severity. Fatigue after 9 months and age predicted later PCS-S; quality of life and depression added predictive value in females. Fatigue and sleep issues predicted PCS-R, with living/employment status relevant in females and cognitive deficits in males.
Interpretation: The severity of PCS subtype manifest after 9 months remains relatively stable over time, with distinct gender-specific predictors shaping symptom progression. Tailored interventions are essential for long-term management of PCS pathways.
Funding: The COVIDOM study is funded by the Network University Medicine as part of the NAPKON.
{"title":"Long-term trends in Post-COVID severity: a machine learning analysis from the POP/COVIDOM cohort of the German NAPKON Cohort Network.","authors":"Julian Gutzeit, Martin Weiß, Thomas Bahmer, Wolfgang Lieb, Stefan Schreiber, J Janne Vehreschild, Carolin Nürnberger, Sina M Pütz, Ekaterina Heim, Anne-Kathrin Ruß, Astrid Dempfle, Michael Krawczak, Susanne Poick, Anna Schäfer, Caroline Morbach, Clara Lehmann, M Cristina Polidori, Jens-Peter Reese, Thomas Zoller, Lilian Krist, Jan Heyckendorf, Lennart Michel Reinke, Jürgen Deckert, Grit Hein","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) affects many survivors with varying symptom profiles driven by acute disease severity (PCS-S) or individual resilience (PCS-R). While cross-sectional studies have identified risk factors and gender differences, long-term trajectories remain unclear. This study investigates the stability and progression of PCS-S and PCS-R scores after 9, 24 and 36 months from initial diagnosis, identifying key predictive factors stratified by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 1526 participants of the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON), modeling symptom-based PCS-score trajectories over time with linear mixed-effects models. Data were split into training (n = 944), test (n = 233), and two-site external validation (n = 349) sets. Gender-stratified elastic-net regression used nine-month clinical and psychosocial measures to predict PCS scores at 24 and 36 months. All data were collected between November 2020 and February 2024. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04679584) and in the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00023742).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>PCS-S and PCS-R scores showed small but significant declines between 9 and 36 months (β = -0.054 and -0.065, respectively; p < 0.001), indicating persistent symptom burden despite gradual improvement. Predictive models explained 16.7-52.6% of variance in later PCS severity. Fatigue after 9 months and age predicted later PCS-S; quality of life and depression added predictive value in females. Fatigue and sleep issues predicted PCS-R, with living/employment status relevant in females and cognitive deficits in males.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The severity of PCS subtype manifest after 9 months remains relatively stable over time, with distinct gender-specific predictors shaping symptom progression. Tailored interventions are essential for long-term management of PCS pathways.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The COVIDOM study is funded by the Network University Medicine as part of the NAPKON.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103822"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995463/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147480165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-10eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103825
Shotaro Isozaki, Tobias Skjelbred, Peder Emil Warming, Eleonora Casarini, Eva Irene Bossano Prescott, Reza Jabbari, Jasmin Mujkanovic, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major public health challenge, yet the long-term association of leisure-time physical activity with SCD risk is not well established. We examined whether self-reported leisure-time physical activity is associated with SCD incidence over 28 years, accounting for competing risks from non-SCD mortality and time-updated changes in leisure-time physical activity.
Methods: We included 10,100 participants from the Copenhagen City Heart Study, examined in 1991-1994 and followed until 31 December 2021. SCD events were identified from Danish death certificates using a standardized protocol. Leisure-time physical activity was self-reported at baseline and at 10-year follow-up and incorporated as a time-updated exposure, categorized as low, moderate, or high. Cause-specific Cox models estimated associations with SCD, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, and socioeconomic factors. Cumulative incidence was standardized to the Danish population, and population attributable risk for low activity was calculated. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02993172).
Findings: During a median follow-up of 28.6 years, 897 SCD events occurred among 10,100 participants (mean age 60.8 years; 56% women). Twenty-year standardized cumulative incidence rose with lower activity. In time-updated analyses, moderate and high leisure-time physical activity were associated with lower SCD risk compared with low activity (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.72; and HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62, respectively). After 25 years, 33% (95% CI 21-46%) of SCD could be attributed to low activity.
Interpretation: Higher leisure-time physical activity is associated with lower long-term risk of SCD in this observational cohort. These findings support the potential public health relevance of promoting leisure-time physical activity, although causality cannot be established.
Funding: Research Fund of Tokai University Educational System, Asahikawa Medical University Alumni Fund, Danish Heart Foundation, Birthe and John Meyer Family Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation.
背景:心源性猝死(SCD)仍然是一个主要的公共卫生挑战,但休闲时间体育活动与SCD风险的长期关联尚未得到很好的证实。我们研究了自我报告的休闲时间体力活动是否与28年来的SCD发病率相关,考虑了非SCD死亡率和休闲时间体力活动随时间变化的竞争风险。方法:我们纳入了来自哥本哈根城市心脏研究的10,100名参与者,于1991-1994年接受检查,并随访至2021年12月31日。SCD事件采用标准化方案从丹麦死亡证明中确定。他们在基线和10年随访时自我报告业余时间的身体活动,并将其纳入时间更新暴露,分为低、中、高。病因特异性Cox模型估计了SCD与年龄、性别、吸烟、酒精和社会经济因素的相关性。对丹麦人群的累积发病率进行标准化,并计算低活动的人群归因风险。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT02993172)。结果:在28.6年的中位随访期间,10100名参与者(平均年龄60.8岁,56%为女性)发生了897例SCD事件。20年标准化累积发病率随着活动度的降低而升高。在时间更新分析中,与低运动相比,中等和高休闲时间体育活动与较低的SCD风险相关(风险比(HR)为0.60,95%可信区间(CI) 0.50-0.72;HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62)。25年后,33% (95% CI 21-46%)的SCD可归因于低活动性。解释:在这个观察性队列中,较高的休闲时间体力活动与较低的SCD长期风险相关。这些发现支持促进休闲时间体育活动的潜在公共卫生相关性,尽管因果关系无法确定。资助:东海大学教育系统研究基金、旭川医科大学校友基金、丹麦心脏基金会、Birthe和John Meyer家族基金会、诺和诺德基金会。
{"title":"Leisure-time physical activity and risk of sudden cardiac death: a 28-year follow-up from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.","authors":"Shotaro Isozaki, Tobias Skjelbred, Peder Emil Warming, Eleonora Casarini, Eva Irene Bossano Prescott, Reza Jabbari, Jasmin Mujkanovic, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103825","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major public health challenge, yet the long-term association of leisure-time physical activity with SCD risk is not well established. We examined whether self-reported leisure-time physical activity is associated with SCD incidence over 28 years, accounting for competing risks from non-SCD mortality and time-updated changes in leisure-time physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 10,100 participants from the Copenhagen City Heart Study, examined in 1991-1994 and followed until 31 December 2021. SCD events were identified from Danish death certificates using a standardized protocol. Leisure-time physical activity was self-reported at baseline and at 10-year follow-up and incorporated as a time-updated exposure, categorized as low, moderate, or high. Cause-specific Cox models estimated associations with SCD, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, and socioeconomic factors. Cumulative incidence was standardized to the Danish population, and population attributable risk for low activity was calculated. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02993172).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During a median follow-up of 28.6 years, 897 SCD events occurred among 10,100 participants (mean age 60.8 years; 56% women). Twenty-year standardized cumulative incidence rose with lower activity. In time-updated analyses, moderate and high leisure-time physical activity were associated with lower SCD risk compared with low activity (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.72; and HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62, respectively). After 25 years, 33% (95% CI 21-46%) of SCD could be attributed to low activity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Higher leisure-time physical activity is associated with lower long-term risk of SCD in this observational cohort. These findings support the potential public health relevance of promoting leisure-time physical activity, although causality cannot be established.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Research Fund of Tokai University Educational System, Asahikawa Medical University Alumni Fund, Danish Heart Foundation, Birthe and John Meyer Family Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103825"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12994074/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147480127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103819
Yunyang Deng, Joakim Dillner, Nicholas Baltzer, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Roxana Merino Martinez, Alexander Ploner, Jiayao Lei, Mark Clements
Background: This study aimed to improve cervical screening efficiency by developing and validating machine-learning models for predicting high-grade cervical lesions or worse (HCL) risk.
Methods: From Swedish nationwide registers, we included 474,072 women invited to cervical screening in 2016 (split into 80% training and 20% test sets) and 370,105 women invited in 2017 for validation. All women underwent index cytology and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) testing within the recommended interval after age 29. Predictors included screening results (cytology and/or HPV testing), other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors (including age). Four random forest models were trained via 5-fold cross-validation with different predictors: Model 1 (M1) (all predictors), M2 (cytology, HPV testing, age), M3 (HPV testing, other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors), and M4 (HPV testing and age). We computed area under the curves (AUCs) and created plots to depict positive predictive value (PPV) by the number of women intervened.
Findings: In training and test sets, 1-, 3-, and 5-year HCL incidence proportions were 0.25%, 0.68%, and 1.05%, respectively. Cross-validated AUCs were 0.83-0.96 (M1), 0.83-0.96 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.91-0.93 (M4), depending on the prediction intervals. Similar AUCs were found in the test set. Additionally, the AUCs in the validation set were 0.85-0.95 (M1), 0.85-0.95 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.92-0.93 (M4). Across all intervals, M1 consistently demonstrated the highest PPV, followed by M2, M3, and M4. For each model, PPVs were lowest for 1-year predictions but comparable at 3 and 5 years.
Interpretation: The models demonstrated strong predictive performance. Evaluating PPVs over the number of invited women provides the potential for risk-stratified screening and clinical utility.
Funding: Vetenskapsrådet, FORTE, Karolinska Institutet, Horizon 2020, and Cancerfonden.
{"title":"Prediction models for high-grade cervical lesions or worse using machine learning.","authors":"Yunyang Deng, Joakim Dillner, Nicholas Baltzer, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Roxana Merino Martinez, Alexander Ploner, Jiayao Lei, Mark Clements","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103819","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to improve cervical screening efficiency by developing and validating machine-learning models for predicting high-grade cervical lesions or worse (HCL) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From Swedish nationwide registers, we included 474,072 women invited to cervical screening in 2016 (split into 80% training and 20% test sets) and 370,105 women invited in 2017 for validation. All women underwent index cytology and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) testing within the recommended interval after age 29. Predictors included screening results (cytology and/or HPV testing), other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors (including age). Four random forest models were trained via 5-fold cross-validation with different predictors: Model 1 (M1) (all predictors), M2 (cytology, HPV testing, age), M3 (HPV testing, other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors), and M4 (HPV testing and age). We computed area under the curves (AUCs) and created plots to depict positive predictive value (PPV) by the number of women intervened.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In training and test sets, 1-, 3-, and 5-year HCL incidence proportions were 0.25%, 0.68%, and 1.05%, respectively. Cross-validated AUCs were 0.83-0.96 (M1), 0.83-0.96 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.91-0.93 (M4), depending on the prediction intervals. Similar AUCs were found in the test set. Additionally, the AUCs in the validation set were 0.85-0.95 (M1), 0.85-0.95 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.92-0.93 (M4). Across all intervals, M1 consistently demonstrated the highest PPV, followed by M2, M3, and M4. For each model, PPVs were lowest for 1-year predictions but comparable at 3 and 5 years.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The models demonstrated strong predictive performance. Evaluating PPVs over the number of invited women provides the potential for risk-stratified screening and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Vetenskapsrådet, FORTE, Karolinska Institutet, Horizon 2020, and Cancerfonden.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103819"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972733/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103815
Liqun Jiang, Huimin Ding, Hyun Seo, Buongo Chun
<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different exercise interventions in improving motor function recovery after stroke and to identify optimal rehabilitation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of five databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to March 13, 2025. Primary outcomes included the 6-min walk test (6MWT), 10-m walk test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and FMA (total, UE, LE). Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the relative effects of different exercise modalities. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and evidence certainty was rated using CINeMA. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251091242).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 317 RCTs involving 14,464 stroke patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that, compared with routine care, electrical stimulation plus exercise (ESX) was associated with the largest improvement in walking endurance (MD = 53.4 m, 95% CI 14.27-92.58, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), while aerobic exercise (AE), functional training (FT), gait training (GT), and mind-body exercise (MBE) showed smaller effects. Lower limb training (LLT) demonstrated the greatest improvement in gait speed (MD = 0.18 m/s, 95% CI 0.14-0.23, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), with TCMEX, task-oriented training (TOT), and MBE also showing benefits. For balance (BBS), core stability training (CST) ranked highest (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.30-1.24, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.24%), followed by MBE and FT. FT showed the largest pooled effect for total FMA (SMD = 2.15, 95% CI 0.48-3.81, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.86%), whereas MBE showed larger pooled effects for FMA-LE (SMD = 1.94, 95% CI 0.04-3.85, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.54%) and FMA-UE (SMD = 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-2.63, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.57%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in several pooled comparisons. Meta-regression analyses identified multiple outcome-specific clinical and contextual factors (e.g., intervention duration, stroke phase, stroke severity, routine rehabilitation, age, sex distribution, and socioeconomic setting) that partially explained between-study variability, although no single factor accounted for heterogeneity across all outcomes. Importantly, global network diagnostics indicated acceptable overall model fit and consistency, supporting cautious interpretation of the comparative estimates at the network level.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Several structured exercise interventions were associated with improved motor outcomes after stroke. High heterogeneity was observed in some comparisons; however, meta-regression analyses suggested several potential sources of variability, and global network assessments indicated generally acceptable heterogeneity. These findings should therefore be interpreted cautiously, particularly for outcomes with subst
背景:本研究旨在比较不同运动干预在改善脑卒中后运动功能恢复方面的有效性,并确定最佳康复策略。方法:综合检索截至2025年3月13日的5个随机对照试验(RCTs)数据库。主要结果包括6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、10米步行测试(10MWT)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)和FMA (total, UE, LE)。两两和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较不同运动方式的相对效果。使用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,使用CINeMA评估证据确定性。该系统评价在PROSPERO前瞻性注册(CRD420251091242)。结果:共纳入317项随机对照试验,涉及14464例脑卒中患者。网络荟萃分析显示,与常规护理相比,电刺激加运动(ESX)对步行耐力的改善最大(MD = 53.4 m, 95% CI 14.27-92.58, p < 0.05, I2 = 0%),而有氧运动(AE)、功能训练(FT)、步态训练(GT)和身心运动(MBE)的影响较小。下肢训练(LLT)对步态速度的改善最大(MD = 0.18 m/s, 95% CI 0.14-0.23, p < 0.05, I2 = 0%), TCMEX、任务导向训练(TOT)和MBE也有改善。平衡(BBS),核心稳定性训练(CST)排名最高(SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.30 - -1.24, p < 0.05, I2 = 93.24%),其次是MBE和英国《金融时报》,英国《金融时报》显示最大的混合效应的总菲利普-马萨(SMD = 2.15, 95% CI 0.48 - -3.81, p < 0.05, I2 = 93.86%),而显示MBE FMA-LE大池效应(SMD = 1.94, 95% CI 0.04 - -3.85, p < 0.05, I2 = 97.54%)和FMA-UE (SMD = 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 - -2.63, p < 0.05, I2 = 95.57%)。在几个合并比较中观察到实质性的异质性。meta回归分析确定了多个结果特异性的临床和背景因素(例如,干预时间、卒中阶段、卒中严重程度、常规康复、年龄、性别分布和社会经济环境),这些因素部分解释了研究间的变异性,尽管没有单一因素可以解释所有结果的异质性。重要的是,全球网络诊断显示了可接受的整体模型拟合和一致性,支持在网络层面对比较估计的谨慎解释。解释:几种有组织的运动干预与卒中后运动预后的改善有关。在一些比较中观察到高度异质性;然而,元回归分析显示了几个潜在的变异来源,全球网络评估显示了普遍可接受的异质性。因此,这些发现应谨慎解释,特别是对于研究间存在显著差异的结果。资助:本研究未获得专项资助。
{"title":"Optimal exercise modalities for enhancing motor function recovery after stroke: a Bayesian systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses.","authors":"Liqun Jiang, Huimin Ding, Hyun Seo, Buongo Chun","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103815","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different exercise interventions in improving motor function recovery after stroke and to identify optimal rehabilitation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of five databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to March 13, 2025. Primary outcomes included the 6-min walk test (6MWT), 10-m walk test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and FMA (total, UE, LE). Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the relative effects of different exercise modalities. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and evidence certainty was rated using CINeMA. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251091242).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 317 RCTs involving 14,464 stroke patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that, compared with routine care, electrical stimulation plus exercise (ESX) was associated with the largest improvement in walking endurance (MD = 53.4 m, 95% CI 14.27-92.58, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), while aerobic exercise (AE), functional training (FT), gait training (GT), and mind-body exercise (MBE) showed smaller effects. Lower limb training (LLT) demonstrated the greatest improvement in gait speed (MD = 0.18 m/s, 95% CI 0.14-0.23, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), with TCMEX, task-oriented training (TOT), and MBE also showing benefits. For balance (BBS), core stability training (CST) ranked highest (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.30-1.24, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.24%), followed by MBE and FT. FT showed the largest pooled effect for total FMA (SMD = 2.15, 95% CI 0.48-3.81, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.86%), whereas MBE showed larger pooled effects for FMA-LE (SMD = 1.94, 95% CI 0.04-3.85, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.54%) and FMA-UE (SMD = 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-2.63, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.57%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in several pooled comparisons. Meta-regression analyses identified multiple outcome-specific clinical and contextual factors (e.g., intervention duration, stroke phase, stroke severity, routine rehabilitation, age, sex distribution, and socioeconomic setting) that partially explained between-study variability, although no single factor accounted for heterogeneity across all outcomes. Importantly, global network diagnostics indicated acceptable overall model fit and consistency, supporting cautious interpretation of the comparative estimates at the network level.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Several structured exercise interventions were associated with improved motor outcomes after stroke. High heterogeneity was observed in some comparisons; however, meta-regression analyses suggested several potential sources of variability, and global network assessments indicated generally acceptable heterogeneity. These findings should therefore be interpreted cautiously, particularly for outcomes with subst","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103815"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103795
Ruben Valle, Nora Morrison, Vijaya Raghavan, Srividya N Iyer
Background: Most individuals with psychosis live in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where treatment delays and gaps are common. Little is known about the types of interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) and clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis in LMICs and their effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to identify treatment components delivered for FEP or CHR in LMICs and evaluate their effectiveness.
Methods: In this systematic review, we searched PsycINFO, Embase, and Medline for relevant studies published, without any language restrictions, between database inception and Jan 23, 2022. This search was updated on May 15, 2024 and on January 2, 2026. Records were included if they evaluated at least one more intervention beyond medication and assessment for FEP and beyond assessment for CHR, in LMICs with at least one follow-up. Included papers were classified as programmes (offering FEP/CHR services) or research studies of intervention(s)/outcomes in FEP/CHR. Treatment components were categorised as guideline-based or additional. Effectiveness was assessed across 15 outcomes defined a priori. Study quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and findings were synthesised narratively. This study was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022308467.
Findings: Of 6046 screened records, 125 were included (average: 152 participants; range: 10-1268) across 20 countries and five languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, and Persian). These comprised 10 programmes and 30 studies for FEP in 16 countries (11.7% of LMICs), and eight programmes and eight studies for CHR across eight countries (5.8%). They delivered guideline-based and additional components; however, psychological and psychosocial components were scarce. For FEP, the addition of any psychological or psychosocial component was associated with improved outcomes relative to medication alone. Patient psychoeducation and family interventions were the most frequently implemented components. For CHR, limited data prevented conclusions about the effectiveness of treatment components in LMICs.
Interpretation: Despite limited and moderate-quality evidence, our findings suggest that early intervention can improve outcomes in FEP. However, coverage remains limited to few LMICs and even they struggle to provide comprehensive care. Further research is needed to strengthen, scale, and culturally adapt such services.
Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chairs program.
{"title":"Availability and effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for early psychosis in 20 low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"Ruben Valle, Nora Morrison, Vijaya Raghavan, Srividya N Iyer","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103795","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most individuals with psychosis live in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where treatment delays and gaps are common. Little is known about the types of interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) and clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis in LMICs and their effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to identify treatment components delivered for FEP or CHR in LMICs and evaluate their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, we searched PsycINFO, Embase, and Medline for relevant studies published, without any language restrictions, between database inception and Jan 23, 2022. This search was updated on May 15, 2024 and on January 2, 2026. Records were included if they evaluated at least one more intervention beyond medication and assessment for FEP and beyond assessment for CHR, in LMICs with at least one follow-up. Included papers were classified as programmes (offering FEP/CHR services) or research studies of intervention(s)/outcomes in FEP/CHR. Treatment components were categorised as guideline-based or additional. Effectiveness was assessed across 15 outcomes defined <i>a priori</i>. Study quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and findings were synthesised narratively. This study was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022308467.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 6046 screened records, 125 were included (average: 152 participants; range: 10-1268) across 20 countries and five languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, and Persian). These comprised 10 programmes and 30 studies for FEP in 16 countries (11.7% of LMICs), and eight programmes and eight studies for CHR across eight countries (5.8%). They delivered guideline-based and additional components; however, psychological and psychosocial components were scarce. For FEP, the addition of any psychological or psychosocial component was associated with improved outcomes relative to medication alone. Patient psychoeducation and family interventions were the most frequently implemented components. For CHR, limited data prevented conclusions about the effectiveness of treatment components in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite limited and moderate-quality evidence, our findings suggest that early intervention can improve outcomes in FEP. However, coverage remains limited to few LMICs and even they struggle to provide comprehensive care. Further research is needed to strengthen, scale, and culturally adapt such services.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chairs program.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103795"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103812
Cora L Keeney, Nichole Fairbrother, Vanessa Kitchin, Bryn Stagg, Emily J Fawcett, Azadeh Vaziri, Catherine Xu, Chelsea A Lahey, Jonathan M Fawcett
Background: Although the prevalence of physical abuse in childhood is well studied, the extent among infants-a period of high vulnerability-remains poorly characterized. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical abuse of infants (<24 months) by caregivers, using data from anonymous self-report studies.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Handbook. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science (inception to Sep 3rd, 2025) for studies anonymously reporting the prevalence of physical abuse toward infants (0-24 months) by primary caregivers. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal tool for prevalence studies. Prevalence estimates were aggregated using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression and heterogeneity quantified with 95% prediction intervals. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023459469).
Findings: We identified 20 relevant studies (>220,000 caregivers) with prevalence estimates spread across 16 types of abuse, spanning North America, Europe, and East Asia. The pooled prevalence of reporting at least one form of abuse in a typical sample was 4·8%, 95% CI [2·6%, 7·5%] or 3·9%, 95% CI [1·9%, 6·4%] excluding "lesser" forms of abuse (e.g., spanking)-but with notable heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval [0·6%, 11·9%]. Aggregate estimates ranged from <3% for severe forms of abuse (e.g., shaking, hitting) to 9·5% for spanking or 20·5%-21·0% for slapping on the wrist (which might be culturally sanctioned in some areas).
Interpretation: Approximately one in twenty infants in a typical sample worldwide experience physical abuse by caregivers, though estimates vary and are likely underreported. Even in the first two years of life, many children face violent caregiving practices, pointing to an urgent need for prevention. The large gap between self-reports and official statistics highlights that most infant abuse remains hidden.
Funding: No funding was received for this research.
{"title":"Prevalence of physical abuse by caregivers toward infants aged 0-24 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Cora L Keeney, Nichole Fairbrother, Vanessa Kitchin, Bryn Stagg, Emily J Fawcett, Azadeh Vaziri, Catherine Xu, Chelsea A Lahey, Jonathan M Fawcett","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the prevalence of physical abuse in childhood is well studied, the extent among infants-a period of high vulnerability-remains poorly characterized. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical abuse of infants (<24 months) by caregivers, using data from anonymous self-report studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Handbook. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science (inception to Sep 3rd, 2025) for studies anonymously reporting the prevalence of physical abuse toward infants (0-24 months) by primary caregivers. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal tool for prevalence studies. Prevalence estimates were aggregated using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression and heterogeneity quantified with 95% prediction intervals. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023459469).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 20 relevant studies (>220,000 caregivers) with prevalence estimates spread across 16 types of abuse, spanning North America, Europe, and East Asia. The pooled prevalence of reporting at least one form of abuse in a typical sample was 4·8%, 95% CI [2·6%, 7·5%] or 3·9%, 95% CI [1·9%, 6·4%] excluding \"lesser\" forms of abuse (e.g., spanking)-but with notable heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval [0·6%, 11·9%]. Aggregate estimates ranged from <3% for severe forms of abuse (e.g., shaking, hitting) to 9·5% for spanking or 20·5%-21·0% for slapping on the wrist (which might be culturally sanctioned in some areas).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Approximately one in twenty infants in a typical sample worldwide experience physical abuse by caregivers, though estimates vary and are likely underreported. Even in the first two years of life, many children face violent caregiving practices, pointing to an urgent need for prevention. The large gap between self-reports and official statistics highlights that most infant abuse remains hidden.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>No funding was received for this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103812"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103803
Unjali P Gujral, Peijue Huangfu, Amanuel A Kisho, Elizabeth S Limb, Dzigbordi Kamasa-Quashie, Franck Houndjahoue, Kehinde Ogunyemi, Nanki Singh, Kenneth G Castro, Mia S White, Annabel Baddeley, Bianca Hemmingsen, Farai Mavhunga, Slim Slama, Kerri Viney, Jennifer Manne-Goehler, Matthew J Magee, Julia A Critchley
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health challenge, with 10.8 million people developing TB in 2023. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of TB and adverse TB outcomes. The prevalence of DM is rising, especially in regions of the world where TB is endemic. Early detection and proper management of DM in those with TB may improve outcomes.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the yield of screening and the prevalence of DM among people with TB. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, LILACS, and Web of Science between January 2000 and September 2025. We included studies on the yield and prevalence of DM determined through DM screening among people with TB, where TB was identified microbiologically. All records were independently screened by two reviewers and discrepancies resolved by discussion. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Hoy tool for prevalence studies. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting and stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) region and age (over and under 40 years). This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered online on PROSPERO CRD42023425596.
Findings: Our search retrieved 7530 studies. After full-text screening we included 33 studies involving 19,581 individuals with TB from 21 countries. The overall pooled yield of DM screening in people with TB was 7.8% (95% CI: 5.1-11.1), ranging from 2.6% (95% CI: 1.5-4.0) in the Western Pacific region (3 studies from 1 country) to 31.6% (95% CI: 12.4-54.3) in the Eastern Mediterranean region (3 studies from 2 countries).
Interpretation: DM is common among people with TB. The yield of DM screening was greater in the Eastern Mediterranean and South-East Asia regions which had a higher prevalence of DM. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity across studies and lack of comparison groups without TB in included studies. Future studies are needed to optimize approaches to detect DM among people with TB.
Funding: The World Health Organization Department for HIV, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections and the Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, and the Preventive Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in People with Diabetes Mellitus study.
{"title":"Diabetes screening among people with tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta analysis.","authors":"Unjali P Gujral, Peijue Huangfu, Amanuel A Kisho, Elizabeth S Limb, Dzigbordi Kamasa-Quashie, Franck Houndjahoue, Kehinde Ogunyemi, Nanki Singh, Kenneth G Castro, Mia S White, Annabel Baddeley, Bianca Hemmingsen, Farai Mavhunga, Slim Slama, Kerri Viney, Jennifer Manne-Goehler, Matthew J Magee, Julia A Critchley","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103803","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health challenge, with 10.8 million people developing TB in 2023. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of TB and adverse TB outcomes. The prevalence of DM is rising, especially in regions of the world where TB is endemic. Early detection and proper management of DM in those with TB may improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the yield of screening and the prevalence of DM among people with TB. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, LILACS, and Web of Science between January 2000 and September 2025. We included studies on the yield and prevalence of DM determined through DM screening among people with TB, where TB was identified microbiologically. All records were independently screened by two reviewers and discrepancies resolved by discussion. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Hoy tool for prevalence studies. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting and stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) region and age (over and under 40 years). This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered online on PROSPERO CRD42023425596.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our search retrieved 7530 studies. After full-text screening we included 33 studies involving 19,581 individuals with TB from 21 countries. The overall pooled yield of DM screening in people with TB was 7.8% (95% CI: 5.1-11.1), ranging from 2.6% (95% CI: 1.5-4.0) in the Western Pacific region (3 studies from 1 country) to 31.6% (95% CI: 12.4-54.3) in the Eastern Mediterranean region (3 studies from 2 countries).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>DM is common among people with TB. The yield of DM screening was greater in the Eastern Mediterranean and South-East Asia regions which had a higher prevalence of DM. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity across studies and lack of comparison groups without TB in included studies. Future studies are needed to optimize approaches to detect DM among people with TB.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The World Health Organization Department for HIV, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections and the Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, and the Preventive Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in People with Diabetes Mellitus study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103803"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972728/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103813
Maria Vincenza Mastrolia, Vignesh Pandiarajan, Marco Cattalini, Andrea Taddio, Stefania Vergnano, Jordi Anton, Watchareewan Sontichai, Betul Sozeri, Seza Ozen, Silvia Rosina, Judith Sánchez-Manubens, Ruby Haviv, Priyankar Pal, Adriana Rodrigues Fonseca, Alenka Gagro, Narendra Kumar Bagri, Lucio Verdoni, Davide Montin, Maria Cristina Maggio, Abarna Thangaraj, Rakesh Pilania, Manuel Mosquera, Joan Calzada, Rekwan Sittiwangkul, Kadir Ulu, Zeynep Balik, Yelda Bilginer, Marco Garrone, Elisa Patrone, Elisa Barbi, Giulia Ciacci, Andrea Barucci, Nicolino Ruperto, Gabriele Simonini
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) resistance affects 15-25% of children with Kawasaki disease (KD) and increases the risk of coronary artery abnormalities (CAA). The Kobayashi score has shown good predictive value in Japanese cohorts but limited accuracy in non-Asian populations. The Kawanet model was proposed as an alternative with improved applicability in non-Asian settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective-prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study including children fulfilling the American Heart Association criteria for KD was conducted. The availability of all clinical and laboratory variables required to calculate both the Kobayashi and Kawanet IVIg-resistance scores was mandatory for inclusion (sodium, neutrophil percentage, AST, platelet count, CRP, age, illness days at first IVIg administration, ALT, hepatomegaly, lymphocyte count, time to treatment). All included patients were aged <18 years at the time of KD diagnosis. Prospectively enrolled patients (April 2022-January 2024) were combined with retrospective cases after Jan 1, 2015, from 19 paediatric rheumatology units in Europe (Italy, United Kingdom, Türkiye, Spain Croatia), South America (Brazil), and Asia (India, Thailand, Israel). The primary outcome was to assess the performance of Kobayashi and Kawanet scores and to identify predictors of IVIg resistance during the acute phase of KD in this multiethnic population. IVIg resistance was defined as persistent or recrudescent fever ≥48 h after infusion. This work is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06305611.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 722 patients (median age 2.4 years; 38.1% female), ethnicity was 59.4% Caucasian, 20.5% Indian, 14.3% other Asian, and 5.8% mixed. IVIg resistance occurred in 19.7% (n = 142), highest in mixed-ethnicity patients (33.3%), followed by Caucasian (21.2%), Indian (18.9%), and other Asian (9.7%). Independent predictors of IVIg resistance were prolonged fever (per day increase) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13), cardiac involvement (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.51-3.34), musculoskeletal involvement (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10-3.25), and macrophage activation syndrome (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.13-15.13) while a complete KD phenotype resulted as a protective factor (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67). The Kobayashi score showed 71% sensitivity and 39% specificity (balanced accuracy 55%), whereas the Kawanet score showed 16% sensitivity and 90% specificity (balanced accuracy 53%), with no major ethnic differences.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>IVIg resistance was linked to ethnicity and phenotype. Both scores performed poorly, highlighting the need for inclusive, biomarker-based, adaptive models to guide early treatment intensification. Future research in larger, more ethnically balanced cohorts, with dedicated assessment of structural and sociodemographic determinants are required.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The 2020 Pediatric Rheumatology European Society/Pae
背景:静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)抵抗影响15-25%的川崎病(KD)患儿,并增加冠状动脉异常(CAA)的风险。Kobayashi评分在日本人群中显示出良好的预测价值,但在非亚洲人群中准确性有限。Kawanet模型被提出作为一种替代方案,在非亚洲环境中具有更好的适用性。方法:回顾性、前瞻性、观察性、多中心队列研究,纳入符合美国心脏协会KD标准的儿童。计算Kobayashi和Kawanet IVIg耐药评分所需的所有临床和实验室变量(钠、中性粒细胞百分比、AST、血小板计数、CRP、年龄、首次使用IVIg时的患病天数、ALT、肝面积、淋巴细胞计数、治疗时间)的可用性是纳入的强制性条件。结果:在722例患者中(中位年龄2.4岁,38.1%为女性),种族为白种人59.4%,印度人20.5%,其他亚洲人14.3%,混合人种5.8%。IVIg耐药发生率为19.7% (n = 142),混血患者最高(33.3%),其次是白种人(21.2%)、印度人(18.9%)和其他亚洲人(9.7%)。IVIg耐药的独立预测因子为持续发热(每天升高)(OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13)、心脏受累(OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.51-3.34)、肌肉骨骼受累(OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10-3.25)和巨噬细胞激活综合征(OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.13-15.13),而完整的KD表型是一个保护因子(OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67)。Kobayashi评分的敏感性为71%,特异性为39%(平衡准确度为55%),而Kawanet评分的敏感性为16%,特异性为90%(平衡准确度为53%),没有明显的种族差异。解释:IVIg耐药性与种族和表型有关。这两项评分都表现不佳,这突出了需要包容性的、基于生物标志物的适应性模型来指导早期治疗强化。未来的研究需要在更大的、更种族平衡的队列中进行,并对结构和社会人口决定因素进行专门的评估。资助:2020年欧洲儿科风湿病学会/儿科风湿病国际试验组织资助。
{"title":"Predictive value for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance of Kobayashi and Kawanet scores in 722 children with Kawasaki disease across diverse ethnic backgrounds (KIWI study): an international cohort study.","authors":"Maria Vincenza Mastrolia, Vignesh Pandiarajan, Marco Cattalini, Andrea Taddio, Stefania Vergnano, Jordi Anton, Watchareewan Sontichai, Betul Sozeri, Seza Ozen, Silvia Rosina, Judith Sánchez-Manubens, Ruby Haviv, Priyankar Pal, Adriana Rodrigues Fonseca, Alenka Gagro, Narendra Kumar Bagri, Lucio Verdoni, Davide Montin, Maria Cristina Maggio, Abarna Thangaraj, Rakesh Pilania, Manuel Mosquera, Joan Calzada, Rekwan Sittiwangkul, Kadir Ulu, Zeynep Balik, Yelda Bilginer, Marco Garrone, Elisa Patrone, Elisa Barbi, Giulia Ciacci, Andrea Barucci, Nicolino Ruperto, Gabriele Simonini","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) resistance affects 15-25% of children with Kawasaki disease (KD) and increases the risk of coronary artery abnormalities (CAA). The Kobayashi score has shown good predictive value in Japanese cohorts but limited accuracy in non-Asian populations. The Kawanet model was proposed as an alternative with improved applicability in non-Asian settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective-prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study including children fulfilling the American Heart Association criteria for KD was conducted. The availability of all clinical and laboratory variables required to calculate both the Kobayashi and Kawanet IVIg-resistance scores was mandatory for inclusion (sodium, neutrophil percentage, AST, platelet count, CRP, age, illness days at first IVIg administration, ALT, hepatomegaly, lymphocyte count, time to treatment). All included patients were aged <18 years at the time of KD diagnosis. Prospectively enrolled patients (April 2022-January 2024) were combined with retrospective cases after Jan 1, 2015, from 19 paediatric rheumatology units in Europe (Italy, United Kingdom, Türkiye, Spain Croatia), South America (Brazil), and Asia (India, Thailand, Israel). The primary outcome was to assess the performance of Kobayashi and Kawanet scores and to identify predictors of IVIg resistance during the acute phase of KD in this multiethnic population. IVIg resistance was defined as persistent or recrudescent fever ≥48 h after infusion. This work is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06305611.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 722 patients (median age 2.4 years; 38.1% female), ethnicity was 59.4% Caucasian, 20.5% Indian, 14.3% other Asian, and 5.8% mixed. IVIg resistance occurred in 19.7% (n = 142), highest in mixed-ethnicity patients (33.3%), followed by Caucasian (21.2%), Indian (18.9%), and other Asian (9.7%). Independent predictors of IVIg resistance were prolonged fever (per day increase) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13), cardiac involvement (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.51-3.34), musculoskeletal involvement (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10-3.25), and macrophage activation syndrome (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.13-15.13) while a complete KD phenotype resulted as a protective factor (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67). The Kobayashi score showed 71% sensitivity and 39% specificity (balanced accuracy 55%), whereas the Kawanet score showed 16% sensitivity and 90% specificity (balanced accuracy 53%), with no major ethnic differences.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>IVIg resistance was linked to ethnicity and phenotype. Both scores performed poorly, highlighting the need for inclusive, biomarker-based, adaptive models to guide early treatment intensification. Future research in larger, more ethnically balanced cohorts, with dedicated assessment of structural and sociodemographic determinants are required.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The 2020 Pediatric Rheumatology European Society/Pae","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103813"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12969337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-26eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103792
Martin Schmidt-Hieber, Per Ljungman, Patrick Gilbert, Nina Knelange, Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska, Grzegorz Basak, Hermann Einsele, Gloria Tridello, Nour B Abdeljelil, Alexander Kulagin, Aitana Balaguer-Rosello, Elisabetta Metafuni, Maura Faraci, Jolanta Gozdzik, Rodrigo Martino, Anna M Raiola, Alienor Xhaard, Baris Kuskonmaz, Alessandra Biffi, Krzysztof Czyzewski, Melissa A Gabriel, Joaquin Martínez-Lopez, Irina Zaidman, Paul G Schlegel, Bernd Gruhn, Gergely Krivan, Marta Gonzalez Vicent, Malgorzata Mikulska, Zinaida Peric, Dina Averbuch, Jan Styczynski, Olaf Penack, Rafael de la Camara
Background: CNS disorders (CNSD) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are a significant complication, although there are few specific studies on it. The major objective of this prospective case-control observational study was to characterise infectious and non-infectious CNSD (iCNSD and niCNSD, respectively) after HSCT.
Methods: Patients were eligible for the CNSD group if they underwent HSCT between January 2021 and December 2022 at 20 centres in 11 countries and developed either an iCNSD or a niCNSD at any time after the start of conditioning prior to HSCT, up to the study termination (June 2023). Data were collected by local investigators and sent to the EBMT Leiden Study Unit, Leiden, Netherlands. For each case, two controls surviving the same period after HSCT without CNSD as the respective case were selected. Primary endpoints of this study were (1) percentage of iCNSD and niCNSD, including different causes, (2) characteristics of CNSD (e.g., percentage of patients with an abnormal brain imaging pattern), and (3) the course (e.g., mortality and overall survival [OS] = at different time points). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737785).
Findings: 237 patients (84 cases and 153 controls) were included, of whom 98 (41%) were female and 139 (59%) were male. The frequency of CNSD after HSCT was estimated at 2.9% (84 of 2910 transplanted patients, 95% CI 2.3-3.6%). Among cases, 21 (25%) had a proven/probable iCNSD, 47 (56%) had a proven/probable niCNSD, and 16 (19%) had a possible or unclassified CNSD. Human herpes virus-6 (meningo-)encephalitis was the most frequent proven/probable iCNSD (n = 9, 43%). In patients with proven/probable niCNSD, vascular pathologies were dominant (n = 15, 32%). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, CNSD at the inclusion time point (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.13-7.74, p = 0.027) remained the only significant predictor of inferior OS. Causes of death in the CNSD group were the CNSD (n = 15/36, 42%, eight with proven/probable iCNSD, five with proven/probable niCNSD and two with possible/unspecified CNSD), other HSCT-related causes (n = 7, 19%), relapse/progression (n = 5, 14%), or other (including multifactorial reasons, n = 9, 25%). Relapse/progression was the most frequent cause of death among controls (n = 17/25, 68%).
Interpretation: CNSD represent a serious complication after HSCT with an estimated 2.9% frequency and non-infectious causes prevailing over CNS infections. Patients with a CNSD after HSCT have a reduced OS, with the CNSD itself being the main cause of death.
{"title":"Central nervous system disorders following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective case-control observational study from the Infectious Diseases Working Party and the Transplant Complications Working Party of EBMT.","authors":"Martin Schmidt-Hieber, Per Ljungman, Patrick Gilbert, Nina Knelange, Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska, Grzegorz Basak, Hermann Einsele, Gloria Tridello, Nour B Abdeljelil, Alexander Kulagin, Aitana Balaguer-Rosello, Elisabetta Metafuni, Maura Faraci, Jolanta Gozdzik, Rodrigo Martino, Anna M Raiola, Alienor Xhaard, Baris Kuskonmaz, Alessandra Biffi, Krzysztof Czyzewski, Melissa A Gabriel, Joaquin Martínez-Lopez, Irina Zaidman, Paul G Schlegel, Bernd Gruhn, Gergely Krivan, Marta Gonzalez Vicent, Malgorzata Mikulska, Zinaida Peric, Dina Averbuch, Jan Styczynski, Olaf Penack, Rafael de la Camara","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103792","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CNS disorders (CNSD) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are a significant complication, although there are few specific studies on it. The major objective of this prospective case-control observational study was to characterise infectious and non-infectious CNSD (iCNSD and niCNSD, respectively) after HSCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were eligible for the CNSD group if they underwent HSCT between January 2021 and December 2022 at 20 centres in 11 countries and developed either an iCNSD or a niCNSD at any time after the start of conditioning prior to HSCT, up to the study termination (June 2023). Data were collected by local investigators and sent to the EBMT Leiden Study Unit, Leiden, Netherlands. For each case, two controls surviving the same period after HSCT without CNSD as the respective case were selected. Primary endpoints of this study were (1) percentage of iCNSD and niCNSD, including different causes, (2) characteristics of CNSD (e.g., percentage of patients with an abnormal brain imaging pattern), and (3) the course (e.g., mortality and overall survival [OS] = at different time points). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737785).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>237 patients (84 cases and 153 controls) were included, of whom 98 (41%) were female and 139 (59%) were male. The frequency of CNSD after HSCT was estimated at 2.9% (84 of 2910 transplanted patients, 95% CI 2.3-3.6%). Among cases, 21 (25%) had a proven/probable iCNSD, 47 (56%) had a proven/probable niCNSD, and 16 (19%) had a possible or unclassified CNSD. Human herpes virus-6 (meningo-)encephalitis was the most frequent proven/probable iCNSD (n = 9, 43%). In patients with proven/probable niCNSD, vascular pathologies were dominant (n = 15, 32%). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, CNSD at the inclusion time point (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.13-7.74, p = 0.027) remained the only significant predictor of inferior OS. Causes of death in the CNSD group were the CNSD (n = 15/36, 42%, eight with proven/probable iCNSD, five with proven/probable niCNSD and two with possible/unspecified CNSD), other HSCT-related causes (n = 7, 19%), relapse/progression (n = 5, 14%), or other (including multifactorial reasons, n = 9, 25%). Relapse/progression was the most frequent cause of death among controls (n = 17/25, 68%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>CNSD represent a serious complication after HSCT with an estimated 2.9% frequency and non-infectious causes prevailing over CNS infections. Patients with a CNSD after HSCT have a reduced OS, with the CNSD itself being the main cause of death.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103792"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12955586/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147354252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}