首页 > 最新文献

EClinicalMedicine最新文献

英文 中文
Once-daily oral ritlecitinib or brepocitinib versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severely active Crohn's disease (PIZZICATO): an international, randomised, phase 2a trial. 每日一次口服利来替尼或布雷波西替尼与安慰剂治疗中度至重度活动性克罗恩病(PIZZICATO):一项国际随机2a期试验
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-10 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103820
Severine Vermeire, Jessica R Allegretti, Hyo Jong Kim, Millie D Long, Jaroslaw Leszczyszyn, Stefan Schreiber, Jaroslaw Kierkus, Paulette D Chandler, Jyoti Ramakrishna, Elena Peeva, Michael S Vincent, Negin Shojaee, Ping Mahling, Christopher Banfield, Anindita Banerjee, Jeremy D Gale, Kenneth E Hung
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crohn's disease (CD) has a high unmet need for treatment. Ritlecitinib (Janus Kinase [JAK]3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [TEC] family kinase inhibitor) or brepocitinib (tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)/JAK1 inhibitor) are promising therapeutic targets. We aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PIZZICATO was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, induction-maintenance, phase 2a study in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD. Eligible patients (18-75 years old) had an established diagnosis (endoscopic and histopathology) of ileal, ileocolonic, or colonic active CD at least 3 months before the study started and had documented treatment failure with at least one conventional CD therapy. This study was double-blind during the 12-week induction phase and was open label for the subsequent 52-week open-label extension (OLE) phase. Study participants were enrolled from 140 sites in 26 countries and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive once-daily oral ritlecitinib (200 mg [8 weeks] followed by 50 mg [4 weeks]) or brepocitinib (60 mg [12 weeks]) or placebo in the induction phase, followed by a reduced dose of 50 mg ritlecitinib or 30 mg brepocitinib during the 52-week OLE phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved Simple Endoscopic Score (SES) for CD (SES-CD 50; defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline) at Week 12 (ritlecitinib versus placebo; brepocitinib versus placebo), and was assessed in the full analysis set (FAS; all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug or placebo). The primary endpoint was changed from clinically-meaningful endoscopic improvement (CMEI) by protocol amendment during study execution. The safety profile of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib was assessed as a secondary endpoint during the induction phase and as a primary endpoint during the OLE phase. Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (SAS; same as FAS). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395184, and EudraCT, 2017-003359-43.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Feb 2, 2018, and Oct 19, 2023, 244 patients (median age: 33.0 [18, 71]) were randomly allocated into study groups (ritlecitinib n = 93; brepocitinib n = 72; placebo n = 79) and included in the FAS and SAS. Of 244 participants dosed in the induction phase, 217 (88.9%) completed the induction phase and entered the OLE phase; 216 were dosed in the OLE phase. Disease activity was generally similar across groups and the majority of participants were tumour necrotizing factor (TNF) inhibitor experienced. For the primary outcome at Week 12, a significantly higher proportion of participants achieved SES-CD 50 with ritlecitinib (difference versus placebo: 14.3% [90% CI 4.0-24.5]; p = 0.012) or brepoc
背景:克罗恩病(CD)有很高的未满足的治疗需求。Ritlecitinib (Janus Kinase [JAK]3/酪氨酸激酶表达于肝细胞癌[TEC]家族激酶抑制剂)或brepocitinib(酪氨酸激酶2 (TYK2)/JAK1抑制剂)是有希望的治疗靶点。我们的目的是评估利来替尼和布雷波西替尼与安慰剂在中重度活动性cd患者中的疗效、安全性、药代动力学和药效学。PIZZICATO是一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、平行组、诱导维持、2a期研究,研究对象为中度至重度活动性CD患者。符合条件的患者(18-75岁)在研究开始前至少3个月有明确的回肠、回肠结肠或结肠活动性CD诊断(内镜和组织病理学),并且至少有一种常规CD治疗失败的记录。该研究在12周诱导期为双盲,随后的52周开放标签延长期(OLE)为开放标签期。研究参与者来自26个国家的140个地点,随机分配(1:1:1),在诱导期接受每日一次口服利来替尼(200 mg[8周],随后50 mg[4周])或布雷波西替尼(60 mg[12周])或安慰剂,随后在52周OLE期减少剂量50 mg利来替尼或30 mg布雷波西替尼。主要疗效终点是在第12周(利来替尼vs安慰剂;布雷波西替尼vs安慰剂)达到CD简单内镜评分(SES)的患者比例(SES-CD 50;定义为比基线减少≥50%),并在完整分析集(FAS;所有接受至少一剂量研究药物或安慰剂的参与者)中进行评估。在研究执行期间,通过方案修改,主要终点从有临床意义的内窥镜改善(CMEI)改变。利来替尼和布雷波替尼的安全性在诱导期作为次要终点,在OLE期作为主要终点进行评估。安全性评价采用安全分析集(SAS,同FAS)。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03395184, EudraCT号为2017-003359-43。结果:在2018年2月2日至2023年10月19日期间,244例患者(中位年龄:33.0岁[18,71])被随机分配到研究组(ritlecitinib n = 93; brepocitinib n = 72;安慰剂n = 79),并纳入FAS和SAS。在诱导期给药的244名参与者中,217名(88.9%)完成了诱导期并进入OLE期;在OLE期给药216例。疾病活动在各组之间大致相似,大多数参与者都经历过肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂。在第12周的主要结局中,利来替尼(与安慰剂的差异:14.3% [90% CI 4.0-24.5]; p = 0.012)或布雷西替尼(21.4% [10.0-32.9];p = 0.0012)达到SES-CD 50的参与者比例显著高于接受安慰剂的参与者。在安全性方面,在诱导阶段,146例(59.8%)患者报告了334例治疗不良事件(teae);在OLE期,169例(78.2%)患者报告了521次teae。大多数teae是轻度或中度的。最常见的是严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)检测阳性(6例,6.5%)。在瑞来替尼200/50 mg组,布雷波替尼组在诱导期出现头痛(5例,6.9%),安慰剂组出现潜在CD恶化(8例,10.1%);在OLE期,利来替尼200/50 mg至50 mg组(12例,14.3%)和布雷波西替尼60 mg至30 mg组(11例,17.2%)和SARS-CoV-2感染组(6例,16.7%)的潜在CD恶化。没有死亡报告。解释:与安慰剂相比,瑞来替尼和布雷波西替尼治疗中重度活动性CD的主要结局有显著改善,具有可接受的安全性。这应被视为有效性的初步证据。目前尚不清楚这些治疗方法对病情较轻的患者可能有多有效。需要对这两种分子进行进一步的研究,并更好地了解应答者和非应答者群体。融资:辉瑞公司
{"title":"Once-daily oral ritlecitinib or brepocitinib versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severely active Crohn's disease (PIZZICATO): an international, randomised, phase 2a trial.","authors":"Severine Vermeire, Jessica R Allegretti, Hyo Jong Kim, Millie D Long, Jaroslaw Leszczyszyn, Stefan Schreiber, Jaroslaw Kierkus, Paulette D Chandler, Jyoti Ramakrishna, Elena Peeva, Michael S Vincent, Negin Shojaee, Ping Mahling, Christopher Banfield, Anindita Banerjee, Jeremy D Gale, Kenneth E Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103820","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Crohn's disease (CD) has a high unmet need for treatment. Ritlecitinib (Janus Kinase [JAK]3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [TEC] family kinase inhibitor) or brepocitinib (tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)/JAK1 inhibitor) are promising therapeutic targets. We aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;PIZZICATO was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, induction-maintenance, phase 2a study in patients with moderate-to-severely active CD. Eligible patients (18-75 years old) had an established diagnosis (endoscopic and histopathology) of ileal, ileocolonic, or colonic active CD at least 3 months before the study started and had documented treatment failure with at least one conventional CD therapy. This study was double-blind during the 12-week induction phase and was open label for the subsequent 52-week open-label extension (OLE) phase. Study participants were enrolled from 140 sites in 26 countries and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive once-daily oral ritlecitinib (200 mg [8 weeks] followed by 50 mg [4 weeks]) or brepocitinib (60 mg [12 weeks]) or placebo in the induction phase, followed by a reduced dose of 50 mg ritlecitinib or 30 mg brepocitinib during the 52-week OLE phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved Simple Endoscopic Score (SES) for CD (SES-CD 50; defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline) at Week 12 (ritlecitinib versus placebo; brepocitinib versus placebo), and was assessed in the full analysis set (FAS; all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug or placebo). The primary endpoint was changed from clinically-meaningful endoscopic improvement (CMEI) by protocol amendment during study execution. The safety profile of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib was assessed as a secondary endpoint during the induction phase and as a primary endpoint during the OLE phase. Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (SAS; same as FAS). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395184, and EudraCT, 2017-003359-43.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Between Feb 2, 2018, and Oct 19, 2023, 244 patients (median age: 33.0 [18, 71]) were randomly allocated into study groups (ritlecitinib n = 93; brepocitinib n = 72; placebo n = 79) and included in the FAS and SAS. Of 244 participants dosed in the induction phase, 217 (88.9%) completed the induction phase and entered the OLE phase; 216 were dosed in the OLE phase. Disease activity was generally similar across groups and the majority of participants were tumour necrotizing factor (TNF) inhibitor experienced. For the primary outcome at Week 12, a significantly higher proportion of participants achieved SES-CD 50 with ritlecitinib (difference versus placebo: 14.3% [90% CI 4.0-24.5]; p = 0.012) or brepoc","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103820"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995499/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147480136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term trends in Post-COVID severity: a machine learning analysis from the POP/COVIDOM cohort of the German NAPKON Cohort Network. covid后严重程度的长期趋势:来自德国NAPKON队列网络的POP/ covid队列的机器学习分析。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-10 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103822
Julian Gutzeit, Martin Weiß, Thomas Bahmer, Wolfgang Lieb, Stefan Schreiber, J Janne Vehreschild, Carolin Nürnberger, Sina M Pütz, Ekaterina Heim, Anne-Kathrin Ruß, Astrid Dempfle, Michael Krawczak, Susanne Poick, Anna Schäfer, Caroline Morbach, Clara Lehmann, M Cristina Polidori, Jens-Peter Reese, Thomas Zoller, Lilian Krist, Jan Heyckendorf, Lennart Michel Reinke, Jürgen Deckert, Grit Hein

Background: Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) affects many survivors with varying symptom profiles driven by acute disease severity (PCS-S) or individual resilience (PCS-R). While cross-sectional studies have identified risk factors and gender differences, long-term trajectories remain unclear. This study investigates the stability and progression of PCS-S and PCS-R scores after 9, 24 and 36 months from initial diagnosis, identifying key predictive factors stratified by gender.

Methods: We analyzed data from 1526 participants of the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON), modeling symptom-based PCS-score trajectories over time with linear mixed-effects models. Data were split into training (n = 944), test (n = 233), and two-site external validation (n = 349) sets. Gender-stratified elastic-net regression used nine-month clinical and psychosocial measures to predict PCS scores at 24 and 36 months. All data were collected between November 2020 and February 2024. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04679584) and in the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00023742).

Findings: PCS-S and PCS-R scores showed small but significant declines between 9 and 36 months (β = -0.054 and -0.065, respectively; p < 0.001), indicating persistent symptom burden despite gradual improvement. Predictive models explained 16.7-52.6% of variance in later PCS severity. Fatigue after 9 months and age predicted later PCS-S; quality of life and depression added predictive value in females. Fatigue and sleep issues predicted PCS-R, with living/employment status relevant in females and cognitive deficits in males.

Interpretation: The severity of PCS subtype manifest after 9 months remains relatively stable over time, with distinct gender-specific predictors shaping symptom progression. Tailored interventions are essential for long-term management of PCS pathways.

Funding: The COVIDOM study is funded by the Network University Medicine as part of the NAPKON.

背景:covid后综合征(PCS)影响许多幸存者,其症状特征由急性疾病严重程度(PCS- s)或个体恢复力(PCS- r)驱动。虽然横断面研究已经确定了风险因素和性别差异,但长期轨迹仍不清楚。本研究调查了首次诊断后9个月、24个月和36个月后PCS-S和PCS-R评分的稳定性和进展,确定了按性别分层的关键预测因素。方法:我们分析了来自德国国家大流行队列网络(NAPKON)的1526名参与者的数据,用线性混合效应模型建模了基于症状的PCS-score随时间的轨迹。数据被分成训练集(n = 944)、检验集(n = 233)和双站外部验证集(n = 349)。性别分层弹性网回归使用9个月的临床和社会心理测量来预测24和36个月时的PCS评分。所有数据收集于2020年11月至2024年2月之间。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04679584)和德国临床研究注册中心(DRKS00023742)注册。结果:在9至36个月期间,PCS-S和PCS-R评分出现小幅但显著的下降(β分别= -0.054和-0.065;p < 0.001),表明尽管症状逐渐改善,但症状负担持续存在。预测模型解释了后期PCS严重程度的16.7-52.6%的方差。9个月后的疲劳和年龄预测了以后的PCS-S;生活质量和抑郁增加了女性的预测价值。疲劳和睡眠问题预测PCS-R,女性的生活/就业状况和男性的认知缺陷相关。解释:9个月后表现的PCS亚型的严重程度随着时间的推移保持相对稳定,具有明显的性别特异性预测因素塑造症状进展。量身定制的干预措施对于PCS途径的长期管理至关重要。资助:covid - om研究由网络大学医学资助,作为NAPKON的一部分。
{"title":"Long-term trends in Post-COVID severity: a machine learning analysis from the POP/COVIDOM cohort of the German NAPKON Cohort Network.","authors":"Julian Gutzeit, Martin Weiß, Thomas Bahmer, Wolfgang Lieb, Stefan Schreiber, J Janne Vehreschild, Carolin Nürnberger, Sina M Pütz, Ekaterina Heim, Anne-Kathrin Ruß, Astrid Dempfle, Michael Krawczak, Susanne Poick, Anna Schäfer, Caroline Morbach, Clara Lehmann, M Cristina Polidori, Jens-Peter Reese, Thomas Zoller, Lilian Krist, Jan Heyckendorf, Lennart Michel Reinke, Jürgen Deckert, Grit Hein","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) affects many survivors with varying symptom profiles driven by acute disease severity (PCS-S) or individual resilience (PCS-R). While cross-sectional studies have identified risk factors and gender differences, long-term trajectories remain unclear. This study investigates the stability and progression of PCS-S and PCS-R scores after 9, 24 and 36 months from initial diagnosis, identifying key predictive factors stratified by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 1526 participants of the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON), modeling symptom-based PCS-score trajectories over time with linear mixed-effects models. Data were split into training (n = 944), test (n = 233), and two-site external validation (n = 349) sets. Gender-stratified elastic-net regression used nine-month clinical and psychosocial measures to predict PCS scores at 24 and 36 months. All data were collected between November 2020 and February 2024. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04679584) and in the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00023742).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>PCS-S and PCS-R scores showed small but significant declines between 9 and 36 months (β = -0.054 and -0.065, respectively; p < 0.001), indicating persistent symptom burden despite gradual improvement. Predictive models explained 16.7-52.6% of variance in later PCS severity. Fatigue after 9 months and age predicted later PCS-S; quality of life and depression added predictive value in females. Fatigue and sleep issues predicted PCS-R, with living/employment status relevant in females and cognitive deficits in males.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The severity of PCS subtype manifest after 9 months remains relatively stable over time, with distinct gender-specific predictors shaping symptom progression. Tailored interventions are essential for long-term management of PCS pathways.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The COVIDOM study is funded by the Network University Medicine as part of the NAPKON.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103822"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995463/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147480165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leisure-time physical activity and risk of sudden cardiac death: a 28-year follow-up from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. 休闲时间体育活动与心源性猝死风险:哥本哈根城市心脏研究28年随访
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-10 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103825
Shotaro Isozaki, Tobias Skjelbred, Peder Emil Warming, Eleonora Casarini, Eva Irene Bossano Prescott, Reza Jabbari, Jasmin Mujkanovic, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen

Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major public health challenge, yet the long-term association of leisure-time physical activity with SCD risk is not well established. We examined whether self-reported leisure-time physical activity is associated with SCD incidence over 28 years, accounting for competing risks from non-SCD mortality and time-updated changes in leisure-time physical activity.

Methods: We included 10,100 participants from the Copenhagen City Heart Study, examined in 1991-1994 and followed until 31 December 2021. SCD events were identified from Danish death certificates using a standardized protocol. Leisure-time physical activity was self-reported at baseline and at 10-year follow-up and incorporated as a time-updated exposure, categorized as low, moderate, or high. Cause-specific Cox models estimated associations with SCD, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, and socioeconomic factors. Cumulative incidence was standardized to the Danish population, and population attributable risk for low activity was calculated. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02993172).

Findings: During a median follow-up of 28.6 years, 897 SCD events occurred among 10,100 participants (mean age 60.8 years; 56% women). Twenty-year standardized cumulative incidence rose with lower activity. In time-updated analyses, moderate and high leisure-time physical activity were associated with lower SCD risk compared with low activity (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.72; and HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62, respectively). After 25 years, 33% (95% CI 21-46%) of SCD could be attributed to low activity.

Interpretation: Higher leisure-time physical activity is associated with lower long-term risk of SCD in this observational cohort. These findings support the potential public health relevance of promoting leisure-time physical activity, although causality cannot be established.

Funding: Research Fund of Tokai University Educational System, Asahikawa Medical University Alumni Fund, Danish Heart Foundation, Birthe and John Meyer Family Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation.

背景:心源性猝死(SCD)仍然是一个主要的公共卫生挑战,但休闲时间体育活动与SCD风险的长期关联尚未得到很好的证实。我们研究了自我报告的休闲时间体力活动是否与28年来的SCD发病率相关,考虑了非SCD死亡率和休闲时间体力活动随时间变化的竞争风险。方法:我们纳入了来自哥本哈根城市心脏研究的10,100名参与者,于1991-1994年接受检查,并随访至2021年12月31日。SCD事件采用标准化方案从丹麦死亡证明中确定。他们在基线和10年随访时自我报告业余时间的身体活动,并将其纳入时间更新暴露,分为低、中、高。病因特异性Cox模型估计了SCD与年龄、性别、吸烟、酒精和社会经济因素的相关性。对丹麦人群的累积发病率进行标准化,并计算低活动的人群归因风险。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT02993172)。结果:在28.6年的中位随访期间,10100名参与者(平均年龄60.8岁,56%为女性)发生了897例SCD事件。20年标准化累积发病率随着活动度的降低而升高。在时间更新分析中,与低运动相比,中等和高休闲时间体育活动与较低的SCD风险相关(风险比(HR)为0.60,95%可信区间(CI) 0.50-0.72;HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62)。25年后,33% (95% CI 21-46%)的SCD可归因于低活动性。解释:在这个观察性队列中,较高的休闲时间体力活动与较低的SCD长期风险相关。这些发现支持促进休闲时间体育活动的潜在公共卫生相关性,尽管因果关系无法确定。资助:东海大学教育系统研究基金、旭川医科大学校友基金、丹麦心脏基金会、Birthe和John Meyer家族基金会、诺和诺德基金会。
{"title":"Leisure-time physical activity and risk of sudden cardiac death: a 28-year follow-up from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.","authors":"Shotaro Isozaki, Tobias Skjelbred, Peder Emil Warming, Eleonora Casarini, Eva Irene Bossano Prescott, Reza Jabbari, Jasmin Mujkanovic, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103825","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major public health challenge, yet the long-term association of leisure-time physical activity with SCD risk is not well established. We examined whether self-reported leisure-time physical activity is associated with SCD incidence over 28 years, accounting for competing risks from non-SCD mortality and time-updated changes in leisure-time physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 10,100 participants from the Copenhagen City Heart Study, examined in 1991-1994 and followed until 31 December 2021. SCD events were identified from Danish death certificates using a standardized protocol. Leisure-time physical activity was self-reported at baseline and at 10-year follow-up and incorporated as a time-updated exposure, categorized as low, moderate, or high. Cause-specific Cox models estimated associations with SCD, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, and socioeconomic factors. Cumulative incidence was standardized to the Danish population, and population attributable risk for low activity was calculated. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02993172).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During a median follow-up of 28.6 years, 897 SCD events occurred among 10,100 participants (mean age 60.8 years; 56% women). Twenty-year standardized cumulative incidence rose with lower activity. In time-updated analyses, moderate and high leisure-time physical activity were associated with lower SCD risk compared with low activity (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.72; and HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62, respectively). After 25 years, 33% (95% CI 21-46%) of SCD could be attributed to low activity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Higher leisure-time physical activity is associated with lower long-term risk of SCD in this observational cohort. These findings support the potential public health relevance of promoting leisure-time physical activity, although causality cannot be established.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Research Fund of Tokai University Educational System, Asahikawa Medical University Alumni Fund, Danish Heart Foundation, Birthe and John Meyer Family Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103825"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12994074/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147480127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prediction models for high-grade cervical lesions or worse using machine learning. 使用机器学习的高度宫颈病变或更严重病变的预测模型。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-05 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103819
Yunyang Deng, Joakim Dillner, Nicholas Baltzer, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Roxana Merino Martinez, Alexander Ploner, Jiayao Lei, Mark Clements

Background: This study aimed to improve cervical screening efficiency by developing and validating machine-learning models for predicting high-grade cervical lesions or worse (HCL) risk.

Methods: From Swedish nationwide registers, we included 474,072 women invited to cervical screening in 2016 (split into 80% training and 20% test sets) and 370,105 women invited in 2017 for validation. All women underwent index cytology and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) testing within the recommended interval after age 29. Predictors included screening results (cytology and/or HPV testing), other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors (including age). Four random forest models were trained via 5-fold cross-validation with different predictors: Model 1 (M1) (all predictors), M2 (cytology, HPV testing, age), M3 (HPV testing, other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors), and M4 (HPV testing and age). We computed area under the curves (AUCs) and created plots to depict positive predictive value (PPV) by the number of women intervened.

Findings: In training and test sets, 1-, 3-, and 5-year HCL incidence proportions were 0.25%, 0.68%, and 1.05%, respectively. Cross-validated AUCs were 0.83-0.96 (M1), 0.83-0.96 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.91-0.93 (M4), depending on the prediction intervals. Similar AUCs were found in the test set. Additionally, the AUCs in the validation set were 0.85-0.95 (M1), 0.85-0.95 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.92-0.93 (M4). Across all intervals, M1 consistently demonstrated the highest PPV, followed by M2, M3, and M4. For each model, PPVs were lowest for 1-year predictions but comparable at 3 and 5 years.

Interpretation: The models demonstrated strong predictive performance. Evaluating PPVs over the number of invited women provides the potential for risk-stratified screening and clinical utility.

Funding: Vetenskapsrådet, FORTE, Karolinska Institutet, Horizon 2020, and Cancerfonden.

背景:本研究旨在通过开发和验证预测宫颈高级别病变或更严重(HCL)风险的机器学习模型来提高宫颈筛查效率。方法:从瑞典全国登记册中,我们纳入了2016年邀请进行宫颈筛查的474,072名妇女(分为80%的培训组和20%的测试组)和2017年邀请进行验证的370,105名妇女。所有女性在29岁后的推荐间隔内接受了细胞学指标和/或人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测。预测因素包括筛查结果(细胞学和/或HPV检测)、其他HPV相关因素和人口统计学因素(包括年龄)。通过不同预测因子的5倍交叉验证训练了4个随机森林模型:模型1 (M1)(所有预测因子)、M2(细胞学、HPV检测、年龄)、M3 (HPV检测、其他HPV相关因素和人口统计学因素)和M4 (HPV检测和年龄)。我们计算了曲线下面积(auc),并绘制了通过女性干预数量来描绘阳性预测值(PPV)的图。结果:在训练集和测试集中,1年、3年和5年HCL发生率分别为0.25%、0.68%和1.05%。交叉验证auc分别为0.83 ~ 0.96 (M1)、0.83 ~ 0.96 (M2)、0.91 ~ 0.94 (M3)和0.91 ~ 0.93 (M4)。在测试集中也发现了类似的auc。验证集的auc分别为0.85 ~ 0.95 (M1)、0.85 ~ 0.95 (M2)、0.91 ~ 0.94 (M3)和0.92 ~ 0.93 (M4)。在所有区间内,M1始终表现出最高的PPV,其次是M2、M3和M4。对于每种模型,1年预测的ppv最低,但3年和5年预测的ppv可比较。解释:模型表现出很强的预测性能。评估ppv对受邀妇女人数的影响,为风险分层筛查和临床应用提供了可能。资助:vetenskapsr det、FORTE、卡罗林斯卡研究所、Horizon 2020和Cancerfonden。
{"title":"Prediction models for high-grade cervical lesions or worse using machine learning.","authors":"Yunyang Deng, Joakim Dillner, Nicholas Baltzer, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Roxana Merino Martinez, Alexander Ploner, Jiayao Lei, Mark Clements","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103819","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to improve cervical screening efficiency by developing and validating machine-learning models for predicting high-grade cervical lesions or worse (HCL) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From Swedish nationwide registers, we included 474,072 women invited to cervical screening in 2016 (split into 80% training and 20% test sets) and 370,105 women invited in 2017 for validation. All women underwent index cytology and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) testing within the recommended interval after age 29. Predictors included screening results (cytology and/or HPV testing), other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors (including age). Four random forest models were trained via 5-fold cross-validation with different predictors: Model 1 (M1) (all predictors), M2 (cytology, HPV testing, age), M3 (HPV testing, other HPV-related factors, and demographic factors), and M4 (HPV testing and age). We computed area under the curves (AUCs) and created plots to depict positive predictive value (PPV) by the number of women intervened.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In training and test sets, 1-, 3-, and 5-year HCL incidence proportions were 0.25%, 0.68%, and 1.05%, respectively. Cross-validated AUCs were 0.83-0.96 (M1), 0.83-0.96 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.91-0.93 (M4), depending on the prediction intervals. Similar AUCs were found in the test set. Additionally, the AUCs in the validation set were 0.85-0.95 (M1), 0.85-0.95 (M2), 0.91-0.94 (M3), and 0.92-0.93 (M4). Across all intervals, M1 consistently demonstrated the highest PPV, followed by M2, M3, and M4. For each model, PPVs were lowest for 1-year predictions but comparable at 3 and 5 years.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The models demonstrated strong predictive performance. Evaluating PPVs over the number of invited women provides the potential for risk-stratified screening and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Vetenskapsrådet, FORTE, Karolinska Institutet, Horizon 2020, and Cancerfonden.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103819"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972733/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimal exercise modalities for enhancing motor function recovery after stroke: a Bayesian systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses. 增强中风后运动功能恢复的最佳运动方式:一项贝叶斯系统综述,包括两两和网络荟萃分析。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-05 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103815
Liqun Jiang, Huimin Ding, Hyun Seo, Buongo Chun
<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different exercise interventions in improving motor function recovery after stroke and to identify optimal rehabilitation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of five databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to March 13, 2025. Primary outcomes included the 6-min walk test (6MWT), 10-m walk test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and FMA (total, UE, LE). Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the relative effects of different exercise modalities. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and evidence certainty was rated using CINeMA. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251091242).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 317 RCTs involving 14,464 stroke patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that, compared with routine care, electrical stimulation plus exercise (ESX) was associated with the largest improvement in walking endurance (MD = 53.4 m, 95% CI 14.27-92.58, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), while aerobic exercise (AE), functional training (FT), gait training (GT), and mind-body exercise (MBE) showed smaller effects. Lower limb training (LLT) demonstrated the greatest improvement in gait speed (MD = 0.18 m/s, 95% CI 0.14-0.23, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), with TCMEX, task-oriented training (TOT), and MBE also showing benefits. For balance (BBS), core stability training (CST) ranked highest (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.30-1.24, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.24%), followed by MBE and FT. FT showed the largest pooled effect for total FMA (SMD = 2.15, 95% CI 0.48-3.81, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.86%), whereas MBE showed larger pooled effects for FMA-LE (SMD = 1.94, 95% CI 0.04-3.85, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.54%) and FMA-UE (SMD = 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-2.63, p < 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.57%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in several pooled comparisons. Meta-regression analyses identified multiple outcome-specific clinical and contextual factors (e.g., intervention duration, stroke phase, stroke severity, routine rehabilitation, age, sex distribution, and socioeconomic setting) that partially explained between-study variability, although no single factor accounted for heterogeneity across all outcomes. Importantly, global network diagnostics indicated acceptable overall model fit and consistency, supporting cautious interpretation of the comparative estimates at the network level.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Several structured exercise interventions were associated with improved motor outcomes after stroke. High heterogeneity was observed in some comparisons; however, meta-regression analyses suggested several potential sources of variability, and global network assessments indicated generally acceptable heterogeneity. These findings should therefore be interpreted cautiously, particularly for outcomes with subst
背景:本研究旨在比较不同运动干预在改善脑卒中后运动功能恢复方面的有效性,并确定最佳康复策略。方法:综合检索截至2025年3月13日的5个随机对照试验(RCTs)数据库。主要结果包括6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、10米步行测试(10MWT)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)和FMA (total, UE, LE)。两两和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较不同运动方式的相对效果。使用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,使用CINeMA评估证据确定性。该系统评价在PROSPERO前瞻性注册(CRD420251091242)。结果:共纳入317项随机对照试验,涉及14464例脑卒中患者。网络荟萃分析显示,与常规护理相比,电刺激加运动(ESX)对步行耐力的改善最大(MD = 53.4 m, 95% CI 14.27-92.58, p < 0.05, I2 = 0%),而有氧运动(AE)、功能训练(FT)、步态训练(GT)和身心运动(MBE)的影响较小。下肢训练(LLT)对步态速度的改善最大(MD = 0.18 m/s, 95% CI 0.14-0.23, p < 0.05, I2 = 0%), TCMEX、任务导向训练(TOT)和MBE也有改善。平衡(BBS),核心稳定性训练(CST)排名最高(SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.30 - -1.24, p < 0.05, I2 = 93.24%),其次是MBE和英国《金融时报》,英国《金融时报》显示最大的混合效应的总菲利普-马萨(SMD = 2.15, 95% CI 0.48 - -3.81, p < 0.05, I2 = 93.86%),而显示MBE FMA-LE大池效应(SMD = 1.94, 95% CI 0.04 - -3.85, p < 0.05, I2 = 97.54%)和FMA-UE (SMD = 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 - -2.63, p < 0.05, I2 = 95.57%)。在几个合并比较中观察到实质性的异质性。meta回归分析确定了多个结果特异性的临床和背景因素(例如,干预时间、卒中阶段、卒中严重程度、常规康复、年龄、性别分布和社会经济环境),这些因素部分解释了研究间的变异性,尽管没有单一因素可以解释所有结果的异质性。重要的是,全球网络诊断显示了可接受的整体模型拟合和一致性,支持在网络层面对比较估计的谨慎解释。解释:几种有组织的运动干预与卒中后运动预后的改善有关。在一些比较中观察到高度异质性;然而,元回归分析显示了几个潜在的变异来源,全球网络评估显示了普遍可接受的异质性。因此,这些发现应谨慎解释,特别是对于研究间存在显著差异的结果。资助:本研究未获得专项资助。
{"title":"Optimal exercise modalities for enhancing motor function recovery after stroke: a Bayesian systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses.","authors":"Liqun Jiang, Huimin Ding, Hyun Seo, Buongo Chun","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103815","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different exercise interventions in improving motor function recovery after stroke and to identify optimal rehabilitation strategies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A comprehensive search of five databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to March 13, 2025. Primary outcomes included the 6-min walk test (6MWT), 10-m walk test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and FMA (total, UE, LE). Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the relative effects of different exercise modalities. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and evidence certainty was rated using CINeMA. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251091242).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 317 RCTs involving 14,464 stroke patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that, compared with routine care, electrical stimulation plus exercise (ESX) was associated with the largest improvement in walking endurance (MD = 53.4 m, 95% CI 14.27-92.58, p &lt; 0.05, I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0%), while aerobic exercise (AE), functional training (FT), gait training (GT), and mind-body exercise (MBE) showed smaller effects. Lower limb training (LLT) demonstrated the greatest improvement in gait speed (MD = 0.18 m/s, 95% CI 0.14-0.23, p &lt; 0.05, I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0%), with TCMEX, task-oriented training (TOT), and MBE also showing benefits. For balance (BBS), core stability training (CST) ranked highest (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.30-1.24, p &lt; 0.05, I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 93.24%), followed by MBE and FT. FT showed the largest pooled effect for total FMA (SMD = 2.15, 95% CI 0.48-3.81, p &lt; 0.05, I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 93.86%), whereas MBE showed larger pooled effects for FMA-LE (SMD = 1.94, 95% CI 0.04-3.85, p &lt; 0.05, I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 97.54%) and FMA-UE (SMD = 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-2.63, p &lt; 0.05, I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 95.57%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in several pooled comparisons. Meta-regression analyses identified multiple outcome-specific clinical and contextual factors (e.g., intervention duration, stroke phase, stroke severity, routine rehabilitation, age, sex distribution, and socioeconomic setting) that partially explained between-study variability, although no single factor accounted for heterogeneity across all outcomes. Importantly, global network diagnostics indicated acceptable overall model fit and consistency, supporting cautious interpretation of the comparative estimates at the network level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/strong&gt;Several structured exercise interventions were associated with improved motor outcomes after stroke. High heterogeneity was observed in some comparisons; however, meta-regression analyses suggested several potential sources of variability, and global network assessments indicated generally acceptable heterogeneity. These findings should therefore be interpreted cautiously, particularly for outcomes with subst","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103815"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Availability and effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for early psychosis in 20 low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. 20个低收入和中等收入国家早期精神病多成分干预措施的可得性和有效性:系统回顾。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-05 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103795
Ruben Valle, Nora Morrison, Vijaya Raghavan, Srividya N Iyer

Background: Most individuals with psychosis live in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where treatment delays and gaps are common. Little is known about the types of interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) and clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis in LMICs and their effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to identify treatment components delivered for FEP or CHR in LMICs and evaluate their effectiveness.

Methods: In this systematic review, we searched PsycINFO, Embase, and Medline for relevant studies published, without any language restrictions, between database inception and Jan 23, 2022. This search was updated on May 15, 2024 and on January 2, 2026. Records were included if they evaluated at least one more intervention beyond medication and assessment for FEP and beyond assessment for CHR, in LMICs with at least one follow-up. Included papers were classified as programmes (offering FEP/CHR services) or research studies of intervention(s)/outcomes in FEP/CHR. Treatment components were categorised as guideline-based or additional. Effectiveness was assessed across 15 outcomes defined a priori. Study quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and findings were synthesised narratively. This study was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022308467.

Findings: Of 6046 screened records, 125 were included (average: 152 participants; range: 10-1268) across 20 countries and five languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, and Persian). These comprised 10 programmes and 30 studies for FEP in 16 countries (11.7% of LMICs), and eight programmes and eight studies for CHR across eight countries (5.8%). They delivered guideline-based and additional components; however, psychological and psychosocial components were scarce. For FEP, the addition of any psychological or psychosocial component was associated with improved outcomes relative to medication alone. Patient psychoeducation and family interventions were the most frequently implemented components. For CHR, limited data prevented conclusions about the effectiveness of treatment components in LMICs.

Interpretation: Despite limited and moderate-quality evidence, our findings suggest that early intervention can improve outcomes in FEP. However, coverage remains limited to few LMICs and even they struggle to provide comprehensive care. Further research is needed to strengthen, scale, and culturally adapt such services.

Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chairs program.

背景:大多数精神病患者生活在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),在这些国家,治疗延误和间隔很常见。对于低收入国家精神病的首发精神病(FEP)和临床高危精神病(CHR)的干预类型及其有效性知之甚少。本系统综述旨在确定中低收入国家FEP或CHR的治疗成分,并评估其有效性。方法:在本系统综述中,我们检索PsycINFO、Embase和Medline数据库,检索从数据库建立到2022年1月23日之间发表的相关研究,没有任何语言限制。该搜索分别于2024年5月15日和2026年1月2日更新。如果他们在至少一次随访的低收入国家中,评估了至少一项药物和FEP评估以及CHR评估之外的干预措施,则记录被纳入。纳入的论文被分类为项目(提供FEP/CHR服务)或FEP/CHR干预/结果的研究。治疗成分分为基于指南的或附加的。评估了15个先验结果的有效性。使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量,并对研究结果进行综合叙述。本研究已在PROSPERO进行预注册,编号为CRD42022308467。研究结果:在6046份筛选记录中,包括125份(平均:152名参与者;范围:10-1268名),涉及20个国家和5种语言(英语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语、土耳其语和波斯语)。其中包括16个国家(11.7%的中低收入国家)的10个FEP项目和30项研究,以及8个国家(5.8%)的CHR项目和8项研究。他们提供了基于指导方针的附加内容;然而,心理和社会心理方面的内容很少。对于FEP,与单独用药相比,任何心理或社会心理成分的添加都与改善的结果相关。患者心理教育和家庭干预是最常实施的组成部分。对于CHR,有限的数据阻碍了对中低收入国家治疗成分有效性的结论。解释:尽管证据有限且质量中等,但我们的研究结果表明早期干预可以改善FEP的预后。然而,覆盖范围仍然局限于少数中低收入国家,甚至它们也难以提供全面的护理。需要进一步研究以加强、扩大和在文化上适应这些服务。资助:加拿大卫生研究院,加拿大研究主席计划。
{"title":"Availability and effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for early psychosis in 20 low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"Ruben Valle, Nora Morrison, Vijaya Raghavan, Srividya N Iyer","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103795","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most individuals with psychosis live in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where treatment delays and gaps are common. Little is known about the types of interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) and clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis in LMICs and their effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to identify treatment components delivered for FEP or CHR in LMICs and evaluate their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, we searched PsycINFO, Embase, and Medline for relevant studies published, without any language restrictions, between database inception and Jan 23, 2022. This search was updated on May 15, 2024 and on January 2, 2026. Records were included if they evaluated at least one more intervention beyond medication and assessment for FEP and beyond assessment for CHR, in LMICs with at least one follow-up. Included papers were classified as programmes (offering FEP/CHR services) or research studies of intervention(s)/outcomes in FEP/CHR. Treatment components were categorised as guideline-based or additional. Effectiveness was assessed across 15 outcomes defined <i>a priori</i>. Study quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and findings were synthesised narratively. This study was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022308467.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 6046 screened records, 125 were included (average: 152 participants; range: 10-1268) across 20 countries and five languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, and Persian). These comprised 10 programmes and 30 studies for FEP in 16 countries (11.7% of LMICs), and eight programmes and eight studies for CHR across eight countries (5.8%). They delivered guideline-based and additional components; however, psychological and psychosocial components were scarce. For FEP, the addition of any psychological or psychosocial component was associated with improved outcomes relative to medication alone. Patient psychoeducation and family interventions were the most frequently implemented components. For CHR, limited data prevented conclusions about the effectiveness of treatment components in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite limited and moderate-quality evidence, our findings suggest that early intervention can improve outcomes in FEP. However, coverage remains limited to few LMICs and even they struggle to provide comprehensive care. Further research is needed to strengthen, scale, and culturally adapt such services.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chairs program.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103795"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of physical abuse by caregivers toward infants aged 0-24 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 照顾者对0-24个月婴儿身体虐待的普遍性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103812
Cora L Keeney, Nichole Fairbrother, Vanessa Kitchin, Bryn Stagg, Emily J Fawcett, Azadeh Vaziri, Catherine Xu, Chelsea A Lahey, Jonathan M Fawcett

Background: Although the prevalence of physical abuse in childhood is well studied, the extent among infants-a period of high vulnerability-remains poorly characterized. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical abuse of infants (<24 months) by caregivers, using data from anonymous self-report studies.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Handbook. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science (inception to Sep 3rd, 2025) for studies anonymously reporting the prevalence of physical abuse toward infants (0-24 months) by primary caregivers. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal tool for prevalence studies. Prevalence estimates were aggregated using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression and heterogeneity quantified with 95% prediction intervals. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023459469).

Findings: We identified 20 relevant studies (>220,000 caregivers) with prevalence estimates spread across 16 types of abuse, spanning North America, Europe, and East Asia. The pooled prevalence of reporting at least one form of abuse in a typical sample was 4·8%, 95% CI [2·6%, 7·5%] or 3·9%, 95% CI [1·9%, 6·4%] excluding "lesser" forms of abuse (e.g., spanking)-but with notable heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval [0·6%, 11·9%]. Aggregate estimates ranged from <3% for severe forms of abuse (e.g., shaking, hitting) to 9·5% for spanking or 20·5%-21·0% for slapping on the wrist (which might be culturally sanctioned in some areas).

Interpretation: Approximately one in twenty infants in a typical sample worldwide experience physical abuse by caregivers, though estimates vary and are likely underreported. Even in the first two years of life, many children face violent caregiving practices, pointing to an urgent need for prevention. The large gap between self-reports and official statistics highlights that most infant abuse remains hidden.

Funding: No funding was received for this research.

背景:尽管对儿童时期身体虐待的普遍程度进行了很好的研究,但婴儿时期——一个高度脆弱的时期——的程度仍然缺乏特征。我们的目的是估计婴儿身体虐待的普遍程度(方法:根据Cochrane手册进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们检索了MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL和Web of Science(成立至2025年9月3日),以查找匿名报告主要照顾者对婴儿(0-24个月)身体虐待流行的研究。两位审稿人使用流行病学研究的乔安娜·布里格斯关键评估工具独立筛选研究并评估偏倚风险。患病率估计汇总使用贝叶斯多水平逻辑回归和异质性量化95%的预测区间。协议注册到PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023459469)。研究结果:我们确定了20项相关研究(共22万名护理人员),其患病率估计分布在北美、欧洲和东亚的16种虐待类型。在典型样本中,报告至少一种虐待形式的总流行率为4.8%,95% CI[2.6%, 7.5%]或3.9%,95% CI[1.9%, 6.4%],不包括“较轻”的虐待形式(如打屁股),但存在显著的异质性,95%预测区间[0.6%,11.9%]。总体估计范围如下:在世界范围内的典型样本中,大约每20名婴儿中就有1名遭受照顾者的身体虐待,尽管估计数字各不相同,而且可能被低估。即使在生命的头两年,许多儿童也面临暴力照料做法,这表明迫切需要进行预防。自我报告和官方统计数据之间的巨大差距突出表明,大多数虐待婴儿的行为仍然是隐藏的。经费:本研究未收到任何经费。
{"title":"Prevalence of physical abuse by caregivers toward infants aged 0-24 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Cora L Keeney, Nichole Fairbrother, Vanessa Kitchin, Bryn Stagg, Emily J Fawcett, Azadeh Vaziri, Catherine Xu, Chelsea A Lahey, Jonathan M Fawcett","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the prevalence of physical abuse in childhood is well studied, the extent among infants-a period of high vulnerability-remains poorly characterized. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical abuse of infants (<24 months) by caregivers, using data from anonymous self-report studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Handbook. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science (inception to Sep 3rd, 2025) for studies anonymously reporting the prevalence of physical abuse toward infants (0-24 months) by primary caregivers. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal tool for prevalence studies. Prevalence estimates were aggregated using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression and heterogeneity quantified with 95% prediction intervals. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023459469).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 20 relevant studies (>220,000 caregivers) with prevalence estimates spread across 16 types of abuse, spanning North America, Europe, and East Asia. The pooled prevalence of reporting at least one form of abuse in a typical sample was 4·8%, 95% CI [2·6%, 7·5%] or 3·9%, 95% CI [1·9%, 6·4%] excluding \"lesser\" forms of abuse (e.g., spanking)-but with notable heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval [0·6%, 11·9%]. Aggregate estimates ranged from <3% for severe forms of abuse (e.g., shaking, hitting) to 9·5% for spanking or 20·5%-21·0% for slapping on the wrist (which might be culturally sanctioned in some areas).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Approximately one in twenty infants in a typical sample worldwide experience physical abuse by caregivers, though estimates vary and are likely underreported. Even in the first two years of life, many children face violent caregiving practices, pointing to an urgent need for prevention. The large gap between self-reports and official statistics highlights that most infant abuse remains hidden.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>No funding was received for this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103812"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diabetes screening among people with tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta analysis. 肺结核患者的糖尿病筛查:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103803
Unjali P Gujral, Peijue Huangfu, Amanuel A Kisho, Elizabeth S Limb, Dzigbordi Kamasa-Quashie, Franck Houndjahoue, Kehinde Ogunyemi, Nanki Singh, Kenneth G Castro, Mia S White, Annabel Baddeley, Bianca Hemmingsen, Farai Mavhunga, Slim Slama, Kerri Viney, Jennifer Manne-Goehler, Matthew J Magee, Julia A Critchley

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health challenge, with 10.8 million people developing TB in 2023. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of TB and adverse TB outcomes. The prevalence of DM is rising, especially in regions of the world where TB is endemic. Early detection and proper management of DM in those with TB may improve outcomes.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the yield of screening and the prevalence of DM among people with TB. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, LILACS, and Web of Science between January 2000 and September 2025. We included studies on the yield and prevalence of DM determined through DM screening among people with TB, where TB was identified microbiologically. All records were independently screened by two reviewers and discrepancies resolved by discussion. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Hoy tool for prevalence studies. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting and stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) region and age (over and under 40 years). This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered online on PROSPERO CRD42023425596.

Findings: Our search retrieved 7530 studies. After full-text screening we included 33 studies involving 19,581 individuals with TB from 21 countries. The overall pooled yield of DM screening in people with TB was 7.8% (95% CI: 5.1-11.1), ranging from 2.6% (95% CI: 1.5-4.0) in the Western Pacific region (3 studies from 1 country) to 31.6% (95% CI: 12.4-54.3) in the Eastern Mediterranean region (3 studies from 2 countries).

Interpretation: DM is common among people with TB. The yield of DM screening was greater in the Eastern Mediterranean and South-East Asia regions which had a higher prevalence of DM. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity across studies and lack of comparison groups without TB in included studies. Future studies are needed to optimize approaches to detect DM among people with TB.

Funding: The World Health Organization Department for HIV, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections and the Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, and the Preventive Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in People with Diabetes Mellitus study.

背景:结核病仍然是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,2023年将有1080万人患结核病。糖尿病(DM)与结核病风险增加和结核病不良结局相关。糖尿病的患病率正在上升,特别是在世界上结核病流行的地区。结核病患者早期发现和适当管理糖尿病可改善预后。方法:我们对筛查率和结核病患者中糖尿病患病率进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。检索的数据库包括2000年1月至2025年9月期间的PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL、CINAHL、Embase、Global Health、LILACS和Web of Science。我们纳入了通过结核病患者糖尿病筛查确定的糖尿病产率和患病率的研究,其中结核病是微生物鉴定的。所有记录均由两名审稿人独立筛选,差异通过讨论解决。偏倚风险(RoB)评估使用Hoy工具的流行病学研究。研究采用随机效应荟萃分析,采用逆方差加权,并按世界卫生组织(WHO)地区和年龄(40岁以上和40岁以下)分层。该系统评价和荟萃分析已在PROSPERO上注册,编号为CRD42023425596。结果:我们检索了7530项研究。在全文筛选后,我们纳入了33项研究,涉及来自21个国家的19581名结核病患者。结核病患者糖尿病筛查的总合并率为7.8% (95% CI: 5.1-11.1),范围从西太平洋地区的2.6% (95% CI: 1.5-4.0)(来自1个国家的3项研究)到东地中海地区的31.6% (95% CI: 12.4-54.3)(来自2个国家的3项研究)。解释:糖尿病在结核病患者中很常见。在糖尿病患病率较高的东地中海和东南亚地区,糖尿病筛查率更高。由于研究的异质性和纳入研究中缺乏无结核病的对照组,研究结果受到限制。未来的研究需要优化在结核病患者中检测糖尿病的方法。资助:世界卫生组织艾滋病毒、结核病、肝炎和性传播感染司和非传染性疾病和精神卫生司,以及糖尿病患者潜伏性结核感染的预防治疗研究。
{"title":"Diabetes screening among people with tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta analysis.","authors":"Unjali P Gujral, Peijue Huangfu, Amanuel A Kisho, Elizabeth S Limb, Dzigbordi Kamasa-Quashie, Franck Houndjahoue, Kehinde Ogunyemi, Nanki Singh, Kenneth G Castro, Mia S White, Annabel Baddeley, Bianca Hemmingsen, Farai Mavhunga, Slim Slama, Kerri Viney, Jennifer Manne-Goehler, Matthew J Magee, Julia A Critchley","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103803","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health challenge, with 10.8 million people developing TB in 2023. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of TB and adverse TB outcomes. The prevalence of DM is rising, especially in regions of the world where TB is endemic. Early detection and proper management of DM in those with TB may improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the yield of screening and the prevalence of DM among people with TB. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, LILACS, and Web of Science between January 2000 and September 2025. We included studies on the yield and prevalence of DM determined through DM screening among people with TB, where TB was identified microbiologically. All records were independently screened by two reviewers and discrepancies resolved by discussion. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Hoy tool for prevalence studies. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting and stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) region and age (over and under 40 years). This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered online on PROSPERO CRD42023425596.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our search retrieved 7530 studies. After full-text screening we included 33 studies involving 19,581 individuals with TB from 21 countries. The overall pooled yield of DM screening in people with TB was 7.8% (95% CI: 5.1-11.1), ranging from 2.6% (95% CI: 1.5-4.0) in the Western Pacific region (3 studies from 1 country) to 31.6% (95% CI: 12.4-54.3) in the Eastern Mediterranean region (3 studies from 2 countries).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>DM is common among people with TB. The yield of DM screening was greater in the Eastern Mediterranean and South-East Asia regions which had a higher prevalence of DM. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity across studies and lack of comparison groups without TB in included studies. Future studies are needed to optimize approaches to detect DM among people with TB.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The World Health Organization Department for HIV, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections and the Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, and the Preventive Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in People with Diabetes Mellitus study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103803"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972728/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictive value for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance of Kobayashi and Kawanet scores in 722 children with Kawasaki disease across diverse ethnic backgrounds (KIWI study): an international cohort study. 在722名不同种族背景的川崎病患儿中,Kobayashi和Kawanet评分对静脉免疫球蛋白耐药的预测价值(KIWI研究):一项国际队列研究。
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103813
Maria Vincenza Mastrolia, Vignesh Pandiarajan, Marco Cattalini, Andrea Taddio, Stefania Vergnano, Jordi Anton, Watchareewan Sontichai, Betul Sozeri, Seza Ozen, Silvia Rosina, Judith Sánchez-Manubens, Ruby Haviv, Priyankar Pal, Adriana Rodrigues Fonseca, Alenka Gagro, Narendra Kumar Bagri, Lucio Verdoni, Davide Montin, Maria Cristina Maggio, Abarna Thangaraj, Rakesh Pilania, Manuel Mosquera, Joan Calzada, Rekwan Sittiwangkul, Kadir Ulu, Zeynep Balik, Yelda Bilginer, Marco Garrone, Elisa Patrone, Elisa Barbi, Giulia Ciacci, Andrea Barucci, Nicolino Ruperto, Gabriele Simonini
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) resistance affects 15-25% of children with Kawasaki disease (KD) and increases the risk of coronary artery abnormalities (CAA). The Kobayashi score has shown good predictive value in Japanese cohorts but limited accuracy in non-Asian populations. The Kawanet model was proposed as an alternative with improved applicability in non-Asian settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective-prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study including children fulfilling the American Heart Association criteria for KD was conducted. The availability of all clinical and laboratory variables required to calculate both the Kobayashi and Kawanet IVIg-resistance scores was mandatory for inclusion (sodium, neutrophil percentage, AST, platelet count, CRP, age, illness days at first IVIg administration, ALT, hepatomegaly, lymphocyte count, time to treatment). All included patients were aged <18 years at the time of KD diagnosis. Prospectively enrolled patients (April 2022-January 2024) were combined with retrospective cases after Jan 1, 2015, from 19 paediatric rheumatology units in Europe (Italy, United Kingdom, Türkiye, Spain Croatia), South America (Brazil), and Asia (India, Thailand, Israel). The primary outcome was to assess the performance of Kobayashi and Kawanet scores and to identify predictors of IVIg resistance during the acute phase of KD in this multiethnic population. IVIg resistance was defined as persistent or recrudescent fever ≥48 h after infusion. This work is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06305611.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 722 patients (median age 2.4 years; 38.1% female), ethnicity was 59.4% Caucasian, 20.5% Indian, 14.3% other Asian, and 5.8% mixed. IVIg resistance occurred in 19.7% (n = 142), highest in mixed-ethnicity patients (33.3%), followed by Caucasian (21.2%), Indian (18.9%), and other Asian (9.7%). Independent predictors of IVIg resistance were prolonged fever (per day increase) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13), cardiac involvement (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.51-3.34), musculoskeletal involvement (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10-3.25), and macrophage activation syndrome (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.13-15.13) while a complete KD phenotype resulted as a protective factor (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67). The Kobayashi score showed 71% sensitivity and 39% specificity (balanced accuracy 55%), whereas the Kawanet score showed 16% sensitivity and 90% specificity (balanced accuracy 53%), with no major ethnic differences.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>IVIg resistance was linked to ethnicity and phenotype. Both scores performed poorly, highlighting the need for inclusive, biomarker-based, adaptive models to guide early treatment intensification. Future research in larger, more ethnically balanced cohorts, with dedicated assessment of structural and sociodemographic determinants are required.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The 2020 Pediatric Rheumatology European Society/Pae
背景:静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)抵抗影响15-25%的川崎病(KD)患儿,并增加冠状动脉异常(CAA)的风险。Kobayashi评分在日本人群中显示出良好的预测价值,但在非亚洲人群中准确性有限。Kawanet模型被提出作为一种替代方案,在非亚洲环境中具有更好的适用性。方法:回顾性、前瞻性、观察性、多中心队列研究,纳入符合美国心脏协会KD标准的儿童。计算Kobayashi和Kawanet IVIg耐药评分所需的所有临床和实验室变量(钠、中性粒细胞百分比、AST、血小板计数、CRP、年龄、首次使用IVIg时的患病天数、ALT、肝面积、淋巴细胞计数、治疗时间)的可用性是纳入的强制性条件。结果:在722例患者中(中位年龄2.4岁,38.1%为女性),种族为白种人59.4%,印度人20.5%,其他亚洲人14.3%,混合人种5.8%。IVIg耐药发生率为19.7% (n = 142),混血患者最高(33.3%),其次是白种人(21.2%)、印度人(18.9%)和其他亚洲人(9.7%)。IVIg耐药的独立预测因子为持续发热(每天升高)(OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13)、心脏受累(OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.51-3.34)、肌肉骨骼受累(OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10-3.25)和巨噬细胞激活综合征(OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.13-15.13),而完整的KD表型是一个保护因子(OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67)。Kobayashi评分的敏感性为71%,特异性为39%(平衡准确度为55%),而Kawanet评分的敏感性为16%,特异性为90%(平衡准确度为53%),没有明显的种族差异。解释:IVIg耐药性与种族和表型有关。这两项评分都表现不佳,这突出了需要包容性的、基于生物标志物的适应性模型来指导早期治疗强化。未来的研究需要在更大的、更种族平衡的队列中进行,并对结构和社会人口决定因素进行专门的评估。资助:2020年欧洲儿科风湿病学会/儿科风湿病国际试验组织资助。
{"title":"Predictive value for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance of Kobayashi and Kawanet scores in 722 children with Kawasaki disease across diverse ethnic backgrounds (KIWI study): an international cohort study.","authors":"Maria Vincenza Mastrolia, Vignesh Pandiarajan, Marco Cattalini, Andrea Taddio, Stefania Vergnano, Jordi Anton, Watchareewan Sontichai, Betul Sozeri, Seza Ozen, Silvia Rosina, Judith Sánchez-Manubens, Ruby Haviv, Priyankar Pal, Adriana Rodrigues Fonseca, Alenka Gagro, Narendra Kumar Bagri, Lucio Verdoni, Davide Montin, Maria Cristina Maggio, Abarna Thangaraj, Rakesh Pilania, Manuel Mosquera, Joan Calzada, Rekwan Sittiwangkul, Kadir Ulu, Zeynep Balik, Yelda Bilginer, Marco Garrone, Elisa Patrone, Elisa Barbi, Giulia Ciacci, Andrea Barucci, Nicolino Ruperto, Gabriele Simonini","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103813","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) resistance affects 15-25% of children with Kawasaki disease (KD) and increases the risk of coronary artery abnormalities (CAA). The Kobayashi score has shown good predictive value in Japanese cohorts but limited accuracy in non-Asian populations. The Kawanet model was proposed as an alternative with improved applicability in non-Asian settings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A retrospective-prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study including children fulfilling the American Heart Association criteria for KD was conducted. The availability of all clinical and laboratory variables required to calculate both the Kobayashi and Kawanet IVIg-resistance scores was mandatory for inclusion (sodium, neutrophil percentage, AST, platelet count, CRP, age, illness days at first IVIg administration, ALT, hepatomegaly, lymphocyte count, time to treatment). All included patients were aged &lt;18 years at the time of KD diagnosis. Prospectively enrolled patients (April 2022-January 2024) were combined with retrospective cases after Jan 1, 2015, from 19 paediatric rheumatology units in Europe (Italy, United Kingdom, Türkiye, Spain Croatia), South America (Brazil), and Asia (India, Thailand, Israel). The primary outcome was to assess the performance of Kobayashi and Kawanet scores and to identify predictors of IVIg resistance during the acute phase of KD in this multiethnic population. IVIg resistance was defined as persistent or recrudescent fever ≥48 h after infusion. This work is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06305611.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 722 patients (median age 2.4 years; 38.1% female), ethnicity was 59.4% Caucasian, 20.5% Indian, 14.3% other Asian, and 5.8% mixed. IVIg resistance occurred in 19.7% (n = 142), highest in mixed-ethnicity patients (33.3%), followed by Caucasian (21.2%), Indian (18.9%), and other Asian (9.7%). Independent predictors of IVIg resistance were prolonged fever (per day increase) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13), cardiac involvement (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.51-3.34), musculoskeletal involvement (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10-3.25), and macrophage activation syndrome (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.13-15.13) while a complete KD phenotype resulted as a protective factor (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67). The Kobayashi score showed 71% sensitivity and 39% specificity (balanced accuracy 55%), whereas the Kawanet score showed 16% sensitivity and 90% specificity (balanced accuracy 53%), with no major ethnic differences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/strong&gt;IVIg resistance was linked to ethnicity and phenotype. Both scores performed poorly, highlighting the need for inclusive, biomarker-based, adaptive models to guide early treatment intensification. Future research in larger, more ethnically balanced cohorts, with dedicated assessment of structural and sociodemographic determinants are required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Funding: &lt;/strong&gt;The 2020 Pediatric Rheumatology European Society/Pae","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103813"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12969337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147431709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Central nervous system disorders following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective case-control observational study from the Infectious Diseases Working Party and the Transplant Complications Working Party of EBMT. 造血干细胞移植后的中枢神经系统疾病:来自EBMT传染病工作组和移植并发症工作组的前瞻性病例对照观察研究
IF 1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-26 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103792
Martin Schmidt-Hieber, Per Ljungman, Patrick Gilbert, Nina Knelange, Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska, Grzegorz Basak, Hermann Einsele, Gloria Tridello, Nour B Abdeljelil, Alexander Kulagin, Aitana Balaguer-Rosello, Elisabetta Metafuni, Maura Faraci, Jolanta Gozdzik, Rodrigo Martino, Anna M Raiola, Alienor Xhaard, Baris Kuskonmaz, Alessandra Biffi, Krzysztof Czyzewski, Melissa A Gabriel, Joaquin Martínez-Lopez, Irina Zaidman, Paul G Schlegel, Bernd Gruhn, Gergely Krivan, Marta Gonzalez Vicent, Malgorzata Mikulska, Zinaida Peric, Dina Averbuch, Jan Styczynski, Olaf Penack, Rafael de la Camara

Background: CNS disorders (CNSD) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are a significant complication, although there are few specific studies on it. The major objective of this prospective case-control observational study was to characterise infectious and non-infectious CNSD (iCNSD and niCNSD, respectively) after HSCT.

Methods: Patients were eligible for the CNSD group if they underwent HSCT between January 2021 and December 2022 at 20 centres in 11 countries and developed either an iCNSD or a niCNSD at any time after the start of conditioning prior to HSCT, up to the study termination (June 2023). Data were collected by local investigators and sent to the EBMT Leiden Study Unit, Leiden, Netherlands. For each case, two controls surviving the same period after HSCT without CNSD as the respective case were selected. Primary endpoints of this study were (1) percentage of iCNSD and niCNSD, including different causes, (2) characteristics of CNSD (e.g., percentage of patients with an abnormal brain imaging pattern), and (3) the course (e.g., mortality and overall survival [OS] = at different time points). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737785).

Findings: 237 patients (84 cases and 153 controls) were included, of whom 98 (41%) were female and 139 (59%) were male. The frequency of CNSD after HSCT was estimated at 2.9% (84 of 2910 transplanted patients, 95% CI 2.3-3.6%). Among cases, 21 (25%) had a proven/probable iCNSD, 47 (56%) had a proven/probable niCNSD, and 16 (19%) had a possible or unclassified CNSD. Human herpes virus-6 (meningo-)encephalitis was the most frequent proven/probable iCNSD (n = 9, 43%). In patients with proven/probable niCNSD, vascular pathologies were dominant (n = 15, 32%). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, CNSD at the inclusion time point (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.13-7.74, p = 0.027) remained the only significant predictor of inferior OS. Causes of death in the CNSD group were the CNSD (n = 15/36, 42%, eight with proven/probable iCNSD, five with proven/probable niCNSD and two with possible/unspecified CNSD), other HSCT-related causes (n = 7, 19%), relapse/progression (n = 5, 14%), or other (including multifactorial reasons, n = 9, 25%). Relapse/progression was the most frequent cause of death among controls (n = 17/25, 68%).

Interpretation: CNSD represent a serious complication after HSCT with an estimated 2.9% frequency and non-infectious causes prevailing over CNS infections. Patients with a CNSD after HSCT have a reduced OS, with the CNSD itself being the main cause of death.

Funding: None.

背景:造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后的中枢神经系统疾病(CNSD)是一个重要的并发症,尽管目前还没有专门的研究。这项前瞻性病例对照观察性研究的主要目的是表征HSCT后感染性和非感染性CNSD(分别为iCNSD和niCNSD)。方法:如果患者在2021年1月至2022年12月期间在11个国家的20个中心接受了HSCT,并且在HSCT前开始适应后的任何时间出现iCNSD或niCNSD,直至研究终止(2023年6月),则符合CNSD组的条件。数据由当地调查员收集并发送给荷兰莱顿EBMT研究中心。对于每个病例,选择两个对照组,在HSCT后没有CNSD,与各自的病例相同。本研究的主要终点是:(1)iCNSD和niCNSD的百分比,包括不同的病因;(2)CNSD的特征(如脑成像模式异常的患者百分比);(3)病程(如不同时间点的死亡率和总生存率[OS] =)。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04737785)。结果:237例患者(84例,153例对照),其中女性98例(41%),男性139例(59%)。HSCT后CNSD的发生率估计为2.9%(2910例移植患者中有84例,95% CI为2.3-3.6%)。在这些病例中,21例(25%)有确诊/可能的iCNSD, 47例(56%)有确诊/可能的niCNSD, 16例(19%)有可能或未确诊的CNSD。人类疱疹病毒-6(脑膜)脑炎是最常见的证实/可能的iCNSD (n = 9,43%)。在证实/可能为niCNSD的患者中,血管病变占主导地位(n = 15.32%)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,纳入时间点的CNSD (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.13-7.74, p = 0.027)仍然是不良OS的唯一显著预测因子。CNSD组的死亡原因为CNSD (n = 15/36, 42%, 8例确诊/可能的iCNSD, 5例确诊/可能的niCNSD, 2例可能/未明确的CNSD),其他hsct相关原因(n = 7, 19%),复发/进展(n = 5, 14%),或其他(包括多因素原因,n = 9, 25%)。复发/进展是对照组中最常见的死亡原因(n = 17/25, 68%)。解释:CNSD是HSCT后的一种严重并发症,估计发生率为2.9%,非感染性原因占CNS感染的主要原因。HSCT后CNSD患者的OS降低,CNSD本身是主要的死亡原因。资金:没有。
{"title":"Central nervous system disorders following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective case-control observational study from the Infectious Diseases Working Party and the Transplant Complications Working Party of EBMT.","authors":"Martin Schmidt-Hieber, Per Ljungman, Patrick Gilbert, Nina Knelange, Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska, Grzegorz Basak, Hermann Einsele, Gloria Tridello, Nour B Abdeljelil, Alexander Kulagin, Aitana Balaguer-Rosello, Elisabetta Metafuni, Maura Faraci, Jolanta Gozdzik, Rodrigo Martino, Anna M Raiola, Alienor Xhaard, Baris Kuskonmaz, Alessandra Biffi, Krzysztof Czyzewski, Melissa A Gabriel, Joaquin Martínez-Lopez, Irina Zaidman, Paul G Schlegel, Bernd Gruhn, Gergely Krivan, Marta Gonzalez Vicent, Malgorzata Mikulska, Zinaida Peric, Dina Averbuch, Jan Styczynski, Olaf Penack, Rafael de la Camara","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103792","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CNS disorders (CNSD) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are a significant complication, although there are few specific studies on it. The major objective of this prospective case-control observational study was to characterise infectious and non-infectious CNSD (iCNSD and niCNSD, respectively) after HSCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were eligible for the CNSD group if they underwent HSCT between January 2021 and December 2022 at 20 centres in 11 countries and developed either an iCNSD or a niCNSD at any time after the start of conditioning prior to HSCT, up to the study termination (June 2023). Data were collected by local investigators and sent to the EBMT Leiden Study Unit, Leiden, Netherlands. For each case, two controls surviving the same period after HSCT without CNSD as the respective case were selected. Primary endpoints of this study were (1) percentage of iCNSD and niCNSD, including different causes, (2) characteristics of CNSD (e.g., percentage of patients with an abnormal brain imaging pattern), and (3) the course (e.g., mortality and overall survival [OS] = at different time points). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737785).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>237 patients (84 cases and 153 controls) were included, of whom 98 (41%) were female and 139 (59%) were male. The frequency of CNSD after HSCT was estimated at 2.9% (84 of 2910 transplanted patients, 95% CI 2.3-3.6%). Among cases, 21 (25%) had a proven/probable iCNSD, 47 (56%) had a proven/probable niCNSD, and 16 (19%) had a possible or unclassified CNSD. Human herpes virus-6 (meningo-)encephalitis was the most frequent proven/probable iCNSD (n = 9, 43%). In patients with proven/probable niCNSD, vascular pathologies were dominant (n = 15, 32%). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, CNSD at the inclusion time point (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.13-7.74, p = 0.027) remained the only significant predictor of inferior OS. Causes of death in the CNSD group were the CNSD (n = 15/36, 42%, eight with proven/probable iCNSD, five with proven/probable niCNSD and two with possible/unspecified CNSD), other HSCT-related causes (n = 7, 19%), relapse/progression (n = 5, 14%), or other (including multifactorial reasons, n = 9, 25%). Relapse/progression was the most frequent cause of death among controls (n = 17/25, 68%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>CNSD represent a serious complication after HSCT with an estimated 2.9% frequency and non-infectious causes prevailing over CNS infections. Patients with a CNSD after HSCT have a reduced OS, with the CNSD itself being the main cause of death.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"103792"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12955586/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147354252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
EClinicalMedicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1