Hampus Petrén, Redouan Adam Anaia, Kruthika Sen Aragam, Andrea Bräutigam, Silvia Eckert, Robin Heinen, Ruth Jakobs, Lina Ojeda-Prieto, Moritz Popp, Rohit Sasidharan, Jörg-Peter Schnitzler, Anke Steppuhn, Frans M. Thon, Sybille B. Unsicker, Nicole M. van Dam, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Meike J. Wittmann, Sol Yepes, Dominik Ziaja, Caroline Müller, Robert R. Junker
Plants produce a great number of phytochemicals serving a variety of different functions. Recently, the chemodiversity of these compounds (i.e., the diversity of compounds produced by a plant) has been suggested to be an important aspect of the plant phenotype that may shape interactions between plants, their environment, and other organisms. However, we lack an agreement on how to quantify chemodiversity, which complicates conclusions about the functional importance of it. Here, we discuss how chemodiversity (deconstructed into components of richness, evenness and disparity) may relate to different ecologically relevant aspects of the phenotype. Then, we systematically review the literature on chemodiversity to examine methodological practices, explore patterns of variability in diversity across different levels of biological organization, and investigate the functional role of this diversity in interactions between plants and other organisms. Overall, the reviewed literature suggests that high chemodiversity is often beneficial for plants, although a heterogeneity of methodological approaches partly limits what general conclusions can be drawn. Importantly, to support future research on this topic, we provide a framework with a decision tree facilitating choices on which measures of chemodiversity are best used in different contexts and outline key questions and avenues for future research. A more thorough understanding of chemodiversity will provide insights into its evolution and functional role in ecological interactions between plants and their environment.
{"title":"Understanding the chemodiversity of plants: Quantification, variation and ecological function","authors":"Hampus Petrén, Redouan Adam Anaia, Kruthika Sen Aragam, Andrea Bräutigam, Silvia Eckert, Robin Heinen, Ruth Jakobs, Lina Ojeda-Prieto, Moritz Popp, Rohit Sasidharan, Jörg-Peter Schnitzler, Anke Steppuhn, Frans M. Thon, Sybille B. Unsicker, Nicole M. van Dam, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Meike J. Wittmann, Sol Yepes, Dominik Ziaja, Caroline Müller, Robert R. Junker","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1635","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecm.1635","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plants produce a great number of phytochemicals serving a variety of different functions. Recently, the chemodiversity of these compounds (i.e., the diversity of compounds produced by a plant) has been suggested to be an important aspect of the plant phenotype that may shape interactions between plants, their environment, and other organisms. However, we lack an agreement on how to quantify chemodiversity, which complicates conclusions about the functional importance of it. Here, we discuss how chemodiversity (deconstructed into components of richness, evenness and disparity) may relate to different ecologically relevant aspects of the phenotype. Then, we systematically review the literature on chemodiversity to examine methodological practices, explore patterns of variability in diversity across different levels of biological organization, and investigate the functional role of this diversity in interactions between plants and other organisms. Overall, the reviewed literature suggests that high chemodiversity is often beneficial for plants, although a heterogeneity of methodological approaches partly limits what general conclusions can be drawn. Importantly, to support future research on this topic, we provide a framework with a decision tree facilitating choices on which measures of chemodiversity are best used in different contexts and outline key questions and avenues for future research. A more thorough understanding of chemodiversity will provide insights into its evolution and functional role in ecological interactions between plants and their environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"94 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.1635","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142436445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amy H. Yarnall, Lauren A. Yeager, Cori Lopazanski, Abigail K. Poray, James W. Morley, Allen H. Hurlbert, F. Joel Fodrie
Seminal ecological theories, island biogeography and the single large or several small (SLOSS) reserve debate, examine whether large contiguous habitats conserve biodiversity better than multiple smaller patches. Today, delineating the ecological effects of habitat area versus configuration in a fragmentation context remains difficult, and often confounds efforts to understand proximate and ultimate drivers of community change in response to habitat alteration. We examined how the major components of fragmentation, habitat division versus area loss, independently influence faunal communities using landscapes constructed from artificial seagrass at scales relevant for juvenile estuarine nekton. We deployed 25 unique, 234-m2 landscapes designed along orthogonal axes: habitat percent cover (i.e., area) and fragmentation per se (i.e., patchiness) to examine their effects on faunal density, community composition, and probability of bait-assay consumption. Faunal sampling occurred in both artificial seagrass and interspaced sandflat matrix. We also examined whether larval-settler density drove faunal density patterns across landscapes. Further, we assessed the relative importance of landscape-scale parameters versus fine-scale complexity–canopy height and epiphyte biomass–in determining faunal densities. We most consistently observed increasing epibenthic fish and macroinvertebrate density with increasing seagrass percent cover. Fragmentation per se only negatively affected epibenthic faunal density within the matrix at low seagrass coverage. Bait consumption increased with seagrass cover, suggesting larger habitats are relative foraging hotspots. Alternatively, benthopelagic fish density was unaffected by habitat parameters, reflecting lower seagrass reliance, or increased matrix tolerance. Community compositions did not vary across landscapes, suggesting that abundant species used landscapes indiscriminately. Finally, the relative importance of habitat parameters shifted across faunal guilds and life stages. Landscape percent cover most affected epibenthic faunal density, but not benthopelagic fish density, and neither pattern was related to settler density. Further, only fine-scale complexity influenced settler densities. Collectively, our results indicate habitat area is a primary, positive driver of faunal densities and generalist consumption, and therefore should be prioritized in seagrass conservation. However, sampling across spatial scales and habitat types revealed nuances in habitat use patterns among faunal guilds and life stages that were not solely area-dependent, illustrating that a variety of landscape configurations support essential nursery functions.
{"title":"Habitat area more consistently affects seagrass faunal communities than fragmentation per se","authors":"Amy H. Yarnall, Lauren A. Yeager, Cori Lopazanski, Abigail K. Poray, James W. Morley, Allen H. Hurlbert, F. Joel Fodrie","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1629","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecm.1629","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seminal ecological theories, island biogeography and the single large or several small (SLOSS) reserve debate, examine whether large contiguous habitats conserve biodiversity better than multiple smaller patches. Today, delineating the ecological effects of habitat area versus configuration in a fragmentation context remains difficult, and often confounds efforts to understand proximate and ultimate drivers of community change in response to habitat alteration. We examined how the major components of fragmentation, habitat division versus area loss, independently influence faunal communities using landscapes constructed from artificial seagrass at scales relevant for juvenile estuarine nekton. We deployed 25 unique, 234-m<sup>2</sup> landscapes designed along orthogonal axes: habitat percent cover (i.e., area) and fragmentation per se (i.e., patchiness) to examine their effects on faunal density, community composition, and probability of bait-assay consumption. Faunal sampling occurred in both artificial seagrass and interspaced sandflat matrix. We also examined whether larval-settler density drove faunal density patterns across landscapes. Further, we assessed the relative importance of landscape-scale parameters versus fine-scale complexity–canopy height and epiphyte biomass–in determining faunal densities. We most consistently observed increasing epibenthic fish and macroinvertebrate density with increasing seagrass percent cover. Fragmentation per se only negatively affected epibenthic faunal density within the matrix at low seagrass coverage. Bait consumption increased with seagrass cover, suggesting larger habitats are relative foraging hotspots. Alternatively, benthopelagic fish density was unaffected by habitat parameters, reflecting lower seagrass reliance, or increased matrix tolerance. Community compositions did not vary across landscapes, suggesting that abundant species used landscapes indiscriminately. Finally, the relative importance of habitat parameters shifted across faunal guilds and life stages. Landscape percent cover most affected epibenthic faunal density, but not benthopelagic fish density, and neither pattern was related to settler density. Further, only fine-scale complexity influenced settler densities. Collectively, our results indicate habitat area is a primary, positive driver of faunal densities and generalist consumption, and therefore should be prioritized in seagrass conservation. However, sampling across spatial scales and habitat types revealed nuances in habitat use patterns among faunal guilds and life stages that were not solely area-dependent, illustrating that a variety of landscape configurations support essential nursery functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"94 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142397872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Changes in host species richness can alter infection risk and disease levels in multi-host communities. I review theoretical predictions for direct and environmental transmission pathogens about the effects of host additions (or removals) on three commonly used disease metrics: the pathogen community reproduction number