首页 > 最新文献

EJNMMI Physics最新文献

英文 中文
Optimal image-derived input function models for multi-parameter analysis and acceptably reduced acquisition time in [18F]F-FAPI-42 PET total-body dynamic imaging for lung cancer. [18F]F-FAPI-42 PET肺癌全身动态成像中用于多参数分析的最佳图像衍生输入函数模型和可接受的缩短采集时间。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00802-y
Jiahao Xie, Dazhi Shi, Ganghua Tang, Lijuan Wang, Yanchao Huang, Kemin Zhou, Ying Tian, Penghui Sun, Yanjiang Han, Hubing Wu

Purpose: Lung tumors, which receive dual-blood-supply from the pulmonary and bronchial arteries, may exhibit distinct kinetic parameters compared to other malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various factors on the kinetic parameter quantification of [18F]F-FAPI-42 dynamic PET/CT and to establish an acceptable shortened acquisition time for lung cancer.

Methods: A total of 19 patients with lung tumors underwent 60-minute total-body dynamic [18F]F-FAPI-42 PET/CT imaging. Tumor kinetic metrics (K1 to K3 and Ki) were calculated using a two-tissue irreversible comparative (2TiC) model. The effects of different image-derived input function (IDIF) models (derived from the right ventricle [RV], left ventricle [LV], and descending aorta [DA]), as well as tumor location, pathohistological subtype and size on kinetic parameters were evaluated. Additionally, the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed to determine an acceptable shortened acquisition time.

Results: The time-activity curve (TAC) of the RV exhibited the earliest and highest peak, followed by those of the LV and DA. Impact of IDIF model and tumor size on kinetic parameters of primary tumors was observed. Specifically, in the RVIF model, size of tumor > 3 cm exhibited higher K2 and K3 than those with size ≤ 3 cm (P < 0.05). Similar findings were also noted for K3 in the LVIF model (P < 0.05), but not in the DAIF model. Tumor location and pathohistological subtype had no significant impact on kinetic parameters quantification. Regarding acquisition time, the RVIF model achieved kinetic parameters equivalent to those at 60 min in 26 min, while the LVIF and DAIF models required 36 min. At 26 min, the tumors were clearly visualized, with SUVmean, SNR, CNR and TBR being equivalent or nearly approaching the values observed at 60 min.

Conclusion: The RVIF model appears to be more suitable than the DAIF model for quantifying kinetic parameters in [18F]F-FAPI-42 PET dynamic imaging of lung cancer, with an acceptable shortened acquisition time of 26 min.

目的:肺肿瘤接受肺动脉和支气管动脉的双血供,与其他恶性肿瘤相比,可能表现出不同的动力学参数。本研究旨在探讨各种因素对[18F]F-FAPI-42动态PET/CT动力学参数量化的影响,建立肺癌可接受的缩短采集时间。方法:对19例肺肿瘤患者进行60分钟全身动态[18F]F-FAPI-42 PET/CT成像。使用两组织不可逆比较(2TiC)模型计算肿瘤动力学指标(K1至K3和Ki)。评估不同影像学输入函数(IDIF)模型(右心室[RV]、左心室[LV]和降主动脉[DA])以及肿瘤位置、病理组织学亚型和大小对动力学参数的影响。此外,评估平均标准化摄取值(SUVmean)、肿瘤与背景比(TBR)、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR),以确定可接受的缩短采集时间。结果:左心室时间-活动曲线(TAC)出现时间最早、峰值最高,左室和左室时间-活动曲线次之。观察IDIF模型和肿瘤大小对原发肿瘤动力学参数的影响。其中,RVIF模型中,肿瘤大小bb0 ~ 3cm的K2和K3高于大小≤3cm的肿瘤(LVIF模型中的p3 (P均值),SNR、CNR和TBR等于或接近60 min时的观察值)。结论:RVIF模型比DAIF模型更适合于肺癌[18F]F-FAPI-42 PET动态成像动力学参数的量化,可接受的采集时间缩短为26 min。
{"title":"Optimal image-derived input function models for multi-parameter analysis and acceptably reduced acquisition time in [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FAPI-42 PET total-body dynamic imaging for lung cancer.","authors":"Jiahao Xie, Dazhi Shi, Ganghua Tang, Lijuan Wang, Yanchao Huang, Kemin Zhou, Ying Tian, Penghui Sun, Yanjiang Han, Hubing Wu","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00802-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00802-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lung tumors, which receive dual-blood-supply from the pulmonary and bronchial arteries, may exhibit distinct kinetic parameters compared to other malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various factors on the kinetic parameter quantification of [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FAPI-42 dynamic PET/CT and to establish an acceptable shortened acquisition time for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 19 patients with lung tumors underwent 60-minute total-body dynamic [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FAPI-42 PET/CT imaging. Tumor kinetic metrics (K<sub>1</sub> to K<sub>3</sub> and K<sub>i</sub>) were calculated using a two-tissue irreversible comparative (2TiC) model. The effects of different image-derived input function (IDIF) models (derived from the right ventricle [RV], left ventricle [LV], and descending aorta [DA]), as well as tumor location, pathohistological subtype and size on kinetic parameters were evaluated. Additionally, the mean standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>mean</sub>), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed to determine an acceptable shortened acquisition time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time-activity curve (TAC) of the RV exhibited the earliest and highest peak, followed by those of the LV and DA. Impact of IDIF model and tumor size on kinetic parameters of primary tumors was observed. Specifically, in the RVIF model, size of tumor > 3 cm exhibited higher K<sub>2</sub> and K<sub>3</sub> than those with size ≤ 3 cm (P < 0.05). Similar findings were also noted for K<sub>3</sub> in the LVIF model (P < 0.05), but not in the DAIF model. Tumor location and pathohistological subtype had no significant impact on kinetic parameters quantification. Regarding acquisition time, the RVIF model achieved kinetic parameters equivalent to those at 60 min in 26 min, while the LVIF and DAIF models required 36 min. At 26 min, the tumors were clearly visualized, with SUV<sub>mean</sub>, SNR, CNR and TBR being equivalent or nearly approaching the values observed at 60 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RVIF model appears to be more suitable than the DAIF model for quantifying kinetic parameters in [<sup>18</sup>F]F-FAPI-42 PET dynamic imaging of lung cancer, with an acceptable shortened acquisition time of 26 min.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521698/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
131I therapy for benign thyroid disease: flexible single-time-point dosimetry using population-based model selection with non-linear mixed-effects modelling. 良性甲状腺疾病的131I治疗:灵活的单时间点剂量测定,使用基于人群的模型选择和非线性混合效应模型。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00806-8
Deni Hardiansyah, Ade Riana, Heribert Hänscheid, Jaja Muhamad Jabar, Ambros J Beer, Michael Lassmann, Gerhard Glatting

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of time-integrated activity (TIA) estimation using single-time-point (STP) data combined with nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NLMEM) and population-based model selection (PBMS) in 73 patients with benign thyroid disease.

Methods: Biokinetic data of 131I were collected from 73 patients with benign thyroid conditions, including Graves' disease, toxic nodular goitre, and non-toxic goitre. Uptake measurements were taken at 2, 6, 24, 48 (73 patients), 96 h (53 patients) or 120 h (20 patients) after administration. The best sum-of-exponentials function (SOEF) with four adjustable parameters, identified in our recent study (Hardiansyah et al. EJNMMI Phys, 2025) by PBMS NLMEM, and the SOEF EANM standard operating procedure (SOP) with three adjustable parameters were then employed to conduct a NLMEM-based STP dosimetry at different time points, i.e. s1TIA and s2TIAs, respectively. In addition, STP dosimetry was performed using the EANM SOP approach (Hänscheid et al. EJNMMI, 2013) to calculate TIAs (hTIAs). The accuracy of the computed s1TIAs, s2TIAs and hTIAs was evaluated by calculating the relative deviations (RDs), mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs), root-mean-square errors (RMSEs), and percentage of absolute RDs of sTIAs and hTIAs exceeding 5% (%RD5) and 10% (%RD10) with the reference TIAs obtained from the four parameters NLMEM fit to all time points data.

Results: Of the time points included, 120 h after administration was found as the optimal time point for STP dosimetry based on the mean ± SD of RD (RMSE, MAPE, %RD5, %RD10) of s1TIA, s2TIAs, and hTIA of 2% ± 4% (4%,3%,25%,0%), 13% ± 6% (14%,13%,90%,60%) and -3% ± 5% (6%,5%,55%,0%), respectively.

Conclusions: While s1TIA typically produced better 131I TIA estimates for benign thyroid disease than the hTIA recommended in the EANM SOP, the STP calculation from NLMEM using SOEF EANM SOP s2TIAs was inferior to hTIA. With the best SOEF model, NLMEM provides satisfactory and reasonable STP estimates.

目的:本研究旨在评估使用单时间点(STP)数据结合非线性混合效应模型(NLMEM)和基于人群的模型选择(PBMS)对73例良性甲状腺疾病患者进行时间积分活动(TIA)估计的准确性。方法:收集73例甲状腺良性疾病(包括Graves病、中毒性结节性甲状腺肿和无毒甲状腺肿)患者的131I生物动力学数据。分别在给药后2、6、24、48(73例)、96 h(53例)或120 h(20例)进行摄取测量。在我们最近的研究中确定了具有四个可调参数的最佳指数和函数(SOEF) (Hardiansyah等)。然后采用PBMS NLMEM标准操作程序(SOP)和SOEF EANM标准操作程序(SOP),分别在不同时间点(即s1TIA和s2tia)进行基于NLMEM的STP剂量测定。此外,STP剂量测定采用EANM SOP方法(Hänscheid等)。EJNMMI, 2013)计算TIAs (hTIAs)。通过计算相对偏差(rd)、平均绝对百分比误差(mape)、均方根误差(rmse)以及stia和htia的绝对rd超过5% (%RD5)和10% (%RD10)的百分比,对计算出的s1tia、s2tia和htia的准确性进行评价。结果:根据s1TIA、s2tia和hTIA的RD (RMSE、MAPE、%RD5、%RD10)的平均值±SD分别为2%±4%(4%、3%、25%、0%)、13%±6%(14%、13%、90%、60%)和-3%±5%(6%、5%、55%、0%),在给药后120 h为STP剂量学的最佳时间点。结论:虽然s1TIA通常比EANM SOP中推荐的hTIA对良性甲状腺疾病产生更好的131I TIA估计,但使用SOEF EANM SOP s2tia从NLMEM计算的STP不如hTIA。利用最优的SOEF模型,NLMEM给出了满意且合理的STP估计。
{"title":"<sup>131</sup>I therapy for benign thyroid disease: flexible single-time-point dosimetry using population-based model selection with non-linear mixed-effects modelling.","authors":"Deni Hardiansyah, Ade Riana, Heribert Hänscheid, Jaja Muhamad Jabar, Ambros J Beer, Michael Lassmann, Gerhard Glatting","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00806-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00806-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of time-integrated activity (TIA) estimation using single-time-point (STP) data combined with nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NLMEM) and population-based model selection (PBMS) in 73 patients with benign thyroid disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biokinetic data of <sup>131</sup>I were collected from 73 patients with benign thyroid conditions, including Graves' disease, toxic nodular goitre, and non-toxic goitre. Uptake measurements were taken at 2, 6, 24, 48 (73 patients), 96 h (53 patients) or 120 h (20 patients) after administration. The best sum-of-exponentials function (SOEF) with four adjustable parameters, identified in our recent study (Hardiansyah et al. EJNMMI Phys, 2025) by PBMS NLMEM, and the SOEF EANM standard operating procedure (SOP) with three adjustable parameters were then employed to conduct a NLMEM-based STP dosimetry at different time points, i.e. s1TIA and s2TIAs, respectively. In addition, STP dosimetry was performed using the EANM SOP approach (Hänscheid et al. EJNMMI, 2013) to calculate TIAs (hTIAs). The accuracy of the computed s1TIAs, s2TIAs and hTIAs was evaluated by calculating the relative deviations (RDs), mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs), root-mean-square errors (RMSEs), and percentage of absolute RDs of sTIAs and hTIAs exceeding 5% (%RD5) and 10% (%RD10) with the reference TIAs obtained from the four parameters NLMEM fit to all time points data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the time points included, 120 h after administration was found as the optimal time point for STP dosimetry based on the mean ± SD of RD (RMSE, MAPE, %RD5, %RD10) of s1TIA, s2TIAs, and hTIA of 2% ± 4% (4%,3%,25%,0%), 13% ± 6% (14%,13%,90%,60%) and -3% ± 5% (6%,5%,55%,0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While s1TIA typically produced better <sup>131</sup>I TIA estimates for benign thyroid disease than the hTIA recommended in the EANM SOP, the STP calculation from NLMEM using SOEF EANM SOP s2TIAs was inferior to hTIA. With the best SOEF model, NLMEM provides satisfactory and reasonable STP estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518191/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145279206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of scatter and partial volume correction techniques for quantitative SPECT imaging of 225Ac. 225Ac定量SPECT成像散射和部分体积校正技术的比较。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00800-0
Grigory Liubchenko, Guido Böning, Mikhail Rumiantcev, Adrian J Zounek, Mathias J Zacherl, Gabriel Sheikh, Sandra Resch, Rudolf A Werner, Sibylle I Ziegler, Astrid Delker

Background: The extreme low-count regime for clinical 225Ac-SPECT imaging poses a challenge to energy-window based scatter correction (EWSC) methods. Moreover, SPECT imaging suffers from partial volume effects (PVE), which can degrade quantification and lead to an underestimation of the absorbed dose estimations, especially in small structures such as lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of scatter correction and partial volume correction (PVC) techniques on post-therapeutic imaging of the three imageable photopeaks of 225Ac.

Methods: A phantom with three 3D-printed spheres (191, 100, 48 ml) was imaged to compare transmission-dependent scatter correction (TDSC) to EWSC (440, 218 keV)/no scatter correction (no SC) (78 keV), as well as the impact of iterative Yang (IY)- and Richardson-Lucy (RL)-based PVC techniques, in terms of contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and recovery coefficients (RC). These scatter correction and PVC methods were also compared for a patient cohort, with two SPECT/CTs acquired 24 and 48 h after [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy, to evaluate their impact on kidney and lesion dosimetry.

Results: In the phantom study, TDSC outperformed EWSC/no SC across all energy windows in terms of CNR, and in terms of RC for 218 and 78 keV energy windows under clinically relevant conditions. Application of PVC techniques resulted in a clear increase in RC and CNR across all energy windows. In the patient study, RBE-weighted kidney absorbed doses increased on average across all kidneys by 9 ± 4%, 30 ± 29% and 35 ± 29% for 440, 218 and 78 keV energy windows, respectively, when TDSC was applied. For lesion dosimetry, TDSC resulted in an average increase across all lesions by 16 ± 8% (218 keV) and 31 ± 30% (78 keV), and a decrease by 4 ± 8% (440 keV). In the patient study, IY-based PVC increased kidney absorbed doses by 172 ± 54%, 157 ± 45% and 146 ± 47%, for 440, 218 and 78 keV energy windows, respectively. RL-based PVC increased lesion absorbed doses by 34 ± 6%, 29 ± 8%, and 23 ± 10%, for 440, 218 and 78 keV energy windows, respectively.

Conclusion: The phantom and patient studies demonstrated TDSC superiority over EWSC/no SC. PVC techniques substantially increased kidney (IY) and lesion (RL) absorbed doses, highlighting their value for post-reconstruction enhancement of 225Ac SPECT images.

背景:临床225Ac-SPECT成像的极低计数体制对基于能量窗的散射校正(EWSC)方法提出了挑战。此外,SPECT成像受到部分体积效应(PVE)的影响,这可能会降低量化并导致吸收剂量估计的低估,特别是在病灶等小结构中。本研究的目的是探讨散射校正和部分体积校正(PVC)技术对225Ac三个可成像光峰的治疗后成像的影响。方法:对三个3d打印球体(191、100、48 ml)的体模进行成像,比较透射相关散射校正(TDSC)与EWSC(440、218 keV)/无散射校正(no SC) (78 keV),以及基于Yang (IY)和Richardson-Lucy (RL)的迭代PVC技术在噪声对比比(CNR)和恢复系数(RC)方面的影响。在一组患者中比较了这些散射校正和PVC方法,在[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T治疗后24和48小时进行了两次SPECT/ ct检查,以评估它们对肾脏和病变剂量学的影响。结果:在幻象研究中,在临床相关条件下,TDSC在所有能量窗的CNR方面优于EWSC/no SC,在218和78 keV能量窗的RC方面优于EWSC/no SC。PVC技术的应用导致RC和CNR在所有能源窗口的明显增加。在患者研究中,当应用TDSC时,在440、218和78 keV能量窗时,rbe加权肾脏吸收剂量在所有肾脏中平均分别增加了9±4%、30±29%和35±29%。对于病变剂量学,TDSC导致所有病变的平均剂量增加16±8% (218 keV)和31±30% (78 keV),减少4±8% (440 keV)。在患者研究中,在440、218和78 keV能量窗下,i基PVC分别使肾脏吸收剂量增加了172±54%、157±45%和146±47%。在440、218和78 keV能量窗下,rl基PVC分别使病灶吸收剂量增加34±6%、29±8%和23±10%。结论:幻影和患者研究表明TDSC优于EWSC/no SC。PVC技术显著增加了肾脏(IY)和病变(RL)的吸收剂量,突出了它们对225Ac SPECT图像重建后增强的价值。
{"title":"Comparison of scatter and partial volume correction techniques for quantitative SPECT imaging of <sup>225</sup>Ac.","authors":"Grigory Liubchenko, Guido Böning, Mikhail Rumiantcev, Adrian J Zounek, Mathias J Zacherl, Gabriel Sheikh, Sandra Resch, Rudolf A Werner, Sibylle I Ziegler, Astrid Delker","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00800-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00800-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extreme low-count regime for clinical <sup>225</sup>Ac-SPECT imaging poses a challenge to energy-window based scatter correction (EWSC) methods. Moreover, SPECT imaging suffers from partial volume effects (PVE), which can degrade quantification and lead to an underestimation of the absorbed dose estimations, especially in small structures such as lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of scatter correction and partial volume correction (PVC) techniques on post-therapeutic imaging of the three imageable photopeaks of <sup>225</sup>Ac.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phantom with three 3D-printed spheres (191, 100, 48 ml) was imaged to compare transmission-dependent scatter correction (TDSC) to EWSC (440, 218 keV)/no scatter correction (no SC) (78 keV), as well as the impact of iterative Yang (IY)- and Richardson-Lucy (RL)-based PVC techniques, in terms of contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and recovery coefficients (RC). These scatter correction and PVC methods were also compared for a patient cohort, with two SPECT/CTs acquired 24 and 48 h after [<sup>225</sup>Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy, to evaluate their impact on kidney and lesion dosimetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the phantom study, TDSC outperformed EWSC/no SC across all energy windows in terms of CNR, and in terms of RC for 218 and 78 keV energy windows under clinically relevant conditions. Application of PVC techniques resulted in a clear increase in RC and CNR across all energy windows. In the patient study, RBE-weighted kidney absorbed doses increased on average across all kidneys by 9 ± 4%, 30 ± 29% and 35 ± 29% for 440, 218 and 78 keV energy windows, respectively, when TDSC was applied. For lesion dosimetry, TDSC resulted in an average increase across all lesions by 16 ± 8% (218 keV) and 31 ± 30% (78 keV), and a decrease by 4 ± 8% (440 keV). In the patient study, IY-based PVC increased kidney absorbed doses by 172 ± 54%, 157 ± 45% and 146 ± 47%, for 440, 218 and 78 keV energy windows, respectively. RL-based PVC increased lesion absorbed doses by 34 ± 6%, 29 ± 8%, and 23 ± 10%, for 440, 218 and 78 keV energy windows, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The phantom and patient studies demonstrated TDSC superiority over EWSC/no SC. PVC techniques substantially increased kidney (IY) and lesion (RL) absorbed doses, highlighting their value for post-reconstruction enhancement of <sup>225</sup>Ac SPECT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491142/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145211960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of SZ-HRX and LEHR collimators for reduced-duration 123I-ioflupane brain SPECT/CT: a phantom study. SZ-HRX和LEHR准直器用于缩短持续时间的123i -碘氟烷脑SPECT/CT的比较:一项幻象研究。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00795-8
Mathieu Pavoine, Kouider-Othmane Kelatma, Clémence Robert, Alexandre Rintaud, Samuel Guigo, Thomas Godefroy, Pierre-Yves Salaün, Solène Querellou, David Bourhis

Background: 123I-ioflupane Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography with Computed Tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging is widely used to assess dopaminergic denervation in parkinsonian syndromes, such as Parkinson's disease and atypical variants. Standard imaging generally uses low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) parallel-hole collimators, which require long acquisition times and minimal source-to-detector distance to optimize spatial resolution. Recently, the Smart-Zoom High-Resolution and eXtended magnification volume (SZ-HRX) solution was designed specifically for neurological applications. It incorporates multifocal collimators and a dedicated reconstruction algorithm, promising a reduction in acquisition duration, and an improvement in patient comfort by allowing detectors to be positioned further away from the head. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of SZ-HRX system compared to LEHR collimators.

Methods: A striatal phantom with 5 compartments (putamens, caudates, and background) was filled with different concentrations of 123I-ioflupane to simulate various clinical situations. Tomographic acquisitions were performed on each LEHR and SZ-HRX system. The summation of dynamically acquired projections allowed testing different acquisition durations with the SZ-HRX collimator. Sensitivity and Spatial resolution were assessed and compared. The data were reconstructed according to EANM recommendations. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), striatum-to-background ratio (SBR), coefficient of variation (CV), and normalized asymmetry index (NAI) were calculated for both systems and compared to the LEHR acquisition. To estimate the shortest SZ-HRX acquisition duration, a linear regression of all quantitative results were calculated between the two systems.

Results: SZ-HRX collimation had superior performance characteristics than LEHR, with relative changes in CNR, CV, and SBR of + 99%, -28% and + 42% respectively, without any decrease in spatial resolution or change in asymmetry index. SZ-HRX system seems to be at least as good as LEHR system, up to 40% of scan time reduction.

Conclusion: SZ-HRX collimation showed superior performance characteristics to LEHR collimation in the study of 123I-ioflupane filled striatal phantom, enabling shorter acquisitions.

背景:123i -碘氟烷单光子发射计算机断层扫描与计算机断层扫描(SPECT-CT)成像被广泛用于评估帕金森综合征(如帕金森病和非典型变体)的多巴胺能失神经。标准成像通常使用低能量高分辨率(LEHR)平行孔准直器,这需要较长的采集时间和最小的源到探测器距离来优化空间分辨率。最近,Smart-Zoom高分辨率和扩展放大体积(SZ-HRX)解决方案专为神经学应用而设计。它结合了多焦点准直器和专用重建算法,有望减少采集时间,并通过允许探测器远离头部来改善患者的舒适度。本研究的目的是比较SZ-HRX系统与LEHR准直器的性能。方法:用不同浓度的碘氟烷填充具有壳核、尾状体和背景5个隔室的纹状体幻体,模拟不同的临床情况。在每个LEHR和SZ-HRX系统上进行层析成像采集。动态获取投影的总和允许用SZ-HRX准直器测试不同的获取持续时间。对灵敏度和空间分辨率进行了评估和比较。根据EANM建议对数据进行重构。计算了两种系统的对比噪声比(CNR)、纹状体背景比(SBR)、变异系数(CV)和归一化不对称指数(NAI),并与LEHR采集进行了比较。为了估计最短的SZ-HRX采集时间,对两个系统之间的所有定量结果进行线性回归计算。结果:SZ-HRX准直具有优于LEHR的性能特征,其CNR、CV和SBR的相对变化分别为+ 99%、-28%和+ 42%,且空间分辨率和不对称指数未发生变化。SZ-HRX系统似乎至少与LEHR系统一样好,最多可减少40%的扫描时间。结论:SZ-HRX准直比LEHR准直在123i -碘氟烷填充纹状体幻体研究中表现出更好的性能特点,可以实现更短的获取时间。
{"title":"Comparison of SZ-HRX and LEHR collimators for reduced-duration 123I-ioflupane brain SPECT/CT: a phantom study.","authors":"Mathieu Pavoine, Kouider-Othmane Kelatma, Clémence Robert, Alexandre Rintaud, Samuel Guigo, Thomas Godefroy, Pierre-Yves Salaün, Solène Querellou, David Bourhis","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00795-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00795-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>123</sup>I-ioflupane Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography with Computed Tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging is widely used to assess dopaminergic denervation in parkinsonian syndromes, such as Parkinson's disease and atypical variants. Standard imaging generally uses low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) parallel-hole collimators, which require long acquisition times and minimal source-to-detector distance to optimize spatial resolution. Recently, the Smart-Zoom High-Resolution and eXtended magnification volume (SZ-HRX) solution was designed specifically for neurological applications. It incorporates multifocal collimators and a dedicated reconstruction algorithm, promising a reduction in acquisition duration, and an improvement in patient comfort by allowing detectors to be positioned further away from the head. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of SZ-HRX system compared to LEHR collimators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A striatal phantom with 5 compartments (putamens, caudates, and background) was filled with different concentrations of <sup>123</sup>I-ioflupane to simulate various clinical situations. Tomographic acquisitions were performed on each LEHR and SZ-HRX system. The summation of dynamically acquired projections allowed testing different acquisition durations with the SZ-HRX collimator. Sensitivity and Spatial resolution were assessed and compared. The data were reconstructed according to EANM recommendations. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), striatum-to-background ratio (SBR), coefficient of variation (CV), and normalized asymmetry index (NAI) were calculated for both systems and compared to the LEHR acquisition. To estimate the shortest SZ-HRX acquisition duration, a linear regression of all quantitative results were calculated between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SZ-HRX collimation had superior performance characteristics than LEHR, with relative changes in CNR, CV, and SBR of + 99%, -28% and + 42% respectively, without any decrease in spatial resolution or change in asymmetry index. SZ-HRX system seems to be at least as good as LEHR system, up to 40% of scan time reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SZ-HRX collimation showed superior performance characteristics to LEHR collimation in the study of <sup>123</sup>I-ioflupane filled striatal phantom, enabling shorter acquisitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145198827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving data-driven gated (DDG) PET and CT registration in thoracic lesions: a comparison of AI registration and DDG CT. 改进数据驱动门控(DDG) PET和CT在胸部病变中的配准:人工智能配准与DDG CT的比较
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00797-6
Tinsu Pan, M Allan Thomas, Yang Lu, Dershan Luo
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Misregistration between CT and PET can result in mis-localization and inaccurate quantification of the tracer uptake in PET. Data-driven gated (DDG) CT can correct registration and quantification but requires a radiation dose of 1.3 mSv and 1 min of acquisition time. AI registration (AIR) does not require an additional CT and has been validated to improve registration and reduce the 'banana' misregistration artifacts around the diaphragm. We aimed to compare a validated AIR and DDG CT in registration and quantification of avid thoracic lesions misregistered in DDG PET scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty PET/CT patient data (23 with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, 4 with <sup>68</sup>Ga-Dotatate, and 3 with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA piflufolastat) with at least one misregistered avid lesion in the thorax were recruited. Patient studies were conducted using DDG CT to correct misregistration with DDG PET data of the phases 30 to 80% on GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanners. Non-attenuation correction DDG PET and misregistered CT were input to AIR and the AIR-corrected CT data were output to register and quantify the DDG PET data. Registration and quantification of lesion SUV<sub>max</sub> and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of the lesion SUV<sub>max</sub> to the 2-cm background mean SUV were compared for each of the 51 avid lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DDG CT outperformed AIR in misregistration correction and quantification of avid thoracic lesions (1.16 ± 0.45 cm). Most lesions (46/51, 90%) showed improved registration from DDG CT relative to AIR, with 10% (5/51) being similar between AIR and DDG CT. The lesions in the baseline CT were an average of 2.06 ± 1.0 cm from their corresponding lesions in the DDG CT, while those in the AIR CT were an average of 0.97 ± 0.54 cm away. AIR significantly improved lesion registration compared to the baseline CT (P < 0.0001). SUV<sub>max</sub> increased by 18.1 ± 15.3% with AIR, but a statistically significantly larger increase of 34.4 ± 25.4% was observed with DDG CT (P < 0.0001). A statistically significant increase in SBR was also observed, rising from 10.5 ± 12.1% of AIR to 21.1 ± 20.5% of DDG CT (P < 0.0001). Many registration improvements by AIR were still left with misregistration. AIR could mis-localize a lymph node to the lung parenchyma or the ribs, and could also mis-localize a lung nodule to the left atrium. AIR could also distort the rib cage and the circular shape of the aorta cross section.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DDG CT outperformed AIR in both localization and quantification of the thoracic avid lesions. AIR improved registration of the misregistered PET/CT. Registered lymph nodes could be falsely misregistered by AIR. AIR-induced distortion of the rib cage can also negatively impact image quality. Further research on AIR's accuracy in modeling true patient respiratory motion without introducing new misregistration or anatomical distortion is warranted.</p
目的:CT与PET之间的错配可导致PET示踪剂摄取定位错误和定量不准确。数据驱动门控(DDG) CT可以校正配准和定量,但需要1.3 mSv的辐射剂量和1分钟的采集时间。AI配准(AIR)不需要额外的CT,并且已经过验证,可以改善配准并减少隔膜周围的“香蕉”误配伪影。我们的目的是比较经过验证的AIR和DDG CT对DDG PET扫描中错误记录的胸部病变的登记和量化。方法:30例PET/CT患者(23例为18F-FDG, 4例为68Ga-Dotatate, 3例为18F-PSMA吡氟司他)至少有一个胸腔误报的强烈病变。使用DDG CT进行患者研究,以纠正GE Discovery MI PET/CT扫描仪上30 - 80%的DDG PET数据的错配。将未衰减校正的DDG PET和错配CT输入AIR,输出AIR校正的CT数据,对DDG PET数据进行配准和量化。比较51个avid病变SUVmax的登记和量化以及病变SUVmax与2 cm背景平均SUV的信本比(SBR)。结果:DDG CT在纠正和定量胸椎明显病变(1.16±0.45 cm)方面优于AIR。大多数病变(46/ 551,90%)显示DDG CT相对于AIR的登记改善,其中10%(5/51)的病变在AIR和DDG CT之间相似。基线CT上病灶与DDG CT对应病灶的距离平均为2.06±1.0 cm, AIR CT上病灶与DDG CT对应病灶的距离平均为0.97±0.54 cm。与基线CT相比,AIR可显著改善病变的定位(P max增加18.1±15.3%),而DDG CT可显著增加34.4±25.4% (P)。结论:DDG CT在胸部病变的定位和量化方面优于AIR。AIR改进了错误注册的PET/CT的注册。已登记的淋巴结可能被AIR错误地误登记。空气引起的胸腔畸变也会对图像质量产生负面影响。进一步研究AIR在不引入新的错配或解剖畸变的情况下模拟真实患者呼吸运动的准确性是有必要的。
{"title":"Improving data-driven gated (DDG) PET and CT registration in thoracic lesions: a comparison of AI registration and DDG CT.","authors":"Tinsu Pan, M Allan Thomas, Yang Lu, Dershan Luo","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00797-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00797-6","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose: &lt;/strong&gt;Misregistration between CT and PET can result in mis-localization and inaccurate quantification of the tracer uptake in PET. Data-driven gated (DDG) CT can correct registration and quantification but requires a radiation dose of 1.3 mSv and 1 min of acquisition time. AI registration (AIR) does not require an additional CT and has been validated to improve registration and reduce the 'banana' misregistration artifacts around the diaphragm. We aimed to compare a validated AIR and DDG CT in registration and quantification of avid thoracic lesions misregistered in DDG PET scans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Thirty PET/CT patient data (23 with &lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F-FDG, 4 with &lt;sup&gt;68&lt;/sup&gt;Ga-Dotatate, and 3 with &lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F-PSMA piflufolastat) with at least one misregistered avid lesion in the thorax were recruited. Patient studies were conducted using DDG CT to correct misregistration with DDG PET data of the phases 30 to 80% on GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanners. Non-attenuation correction DDG PET and misregistered CT were input to AIR and the AIR-corrected CT data were output to register and quantify the DDG PET data. Registration and quantification of lesion SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of the lesion SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; to the 2-cm background mean SUV were compared for each of the 51 avid lesions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;DDG CT outperformed AIR in misregistration correction and quantification of avid thoracic lesions (1.16 ± 0.45 cm). Most lesions (46/51, 90%) showed improved registration from DDG CT relative to AIR, with 10% (5/51) being similar between AIR and DDG CT. The lesions in the baseline CT were an average of 2.06 ± 1.0 cm from their corresponding lesions in the DDG CT, while those in the AIR CT were an average of 0.97 ± 0.54 cm away. AIR significantly improved lesion registration compared to the baseline CT (P &lt; 0.0001). SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; increased by 18.1 ± 15.3% with AIR, but a statistically significantly larger increase of 34.4 ± 25.4% was observed with DDG CT (P &lt; 0.0001). A statistically significant increase in SBR was also observed, rising from 10.5 ± 12.1% of AIR to 21.1 ± 20.5% of DDG CT (P &lt; 0.0001). Many registration improvements by AIR were still left with misregistration. AIR could mis-localize a lymph node to the lung parenchyma or the ribs, and could also mis-localize a lung nodule to the left atrium. AIR could also distort the rib cage and the circular shape of the aorta cross section.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;DDG CT outperformed AIR in both localization and quantification of the thoracic avid lesions. AIR improved registration of the misregistered PET/CT. Registered lymph nodes could be falsely misregistered by AIR. AIR-induced distortion of the rib cage can also negatively impact image quality. Further research on AIR's accuracy in modeling true patient respiratory motion without introducing new misregistration or anatomical distortion is warranted.&lt;/p","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484437/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145198800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Large scale comparison of maximum likelihood scatter scaling and tail-fitted scatter scaling in LAFOV PET/CT. LAFOV PET/CT中最大似然散点缩放与尾部拟合散点缩放的大尺度比较。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00796-7
Nanna Overbeck, Søren Holm, Mohammadreza Teimoorisichani, Maurizio Conti, Thomas Lund Andersen, Flemming Littrup Andersen

Background: Scatter scaling during the reconstruction of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data is a crucial element for obtaining clinically applicable images with accurate quantification and high image quality. The current clinical standard for scatter scaling is fitting the tail regions of the single scatter simulation (SSS) estimate, which is termed Tail-Fitted Scatter Scaling (TFSS). This study aims to compare a Maximum Likelihood Scatter Scaling (MLSS) algorithm relative to TFSS using a NEMA IQ phantom investigation and a patient cohort including 500 patients using long axial Field-of-View (LAFOV) PET. The relative difference between the two scatter scaling algorithms was investigated using uptake values of 12 organs. Furthermore, the proximity of known regions showing high activity relative to the surrounding tissue was analysed.

Results: The NEMA image quality phantom study showed agreement between the expected activity concentration and the MLSS reconstructions. MLSS showed uptake values of 137.3 ± 3.4 kBq/mL in the largest sphere and 34.6 ± 0.5 kBq/mL in the background, closely matching the true concentrations of 136.6 kBq/mL and 35.0 kBq/mL, respectively. TFSS provided uptake values of 133.7 ± 3.5 kBq/mL in the largest sphere and 33.0 ± 0.9 kBq/mL in the background. MLSS showed higher uptake in the cold areas relative to TFSS. Mean recovery coefficients (RCmean) showed that MLSS generally had coefficients closer to 1 relative to TFSS across the spheres of the phantom. The findings of the patient study showed a numeric relative difference below 2% when investigating organ uptake through the 12 organs.

Conclusion: MLSS provided results of high image quality comparable to the standard method of choice, TFSS, in the clinical routine. The phantom study showed that MLSS provided uptake values accurately relative to the known activity concentration, however less accurate within the cold sphere and insert. MLSS was found to provide robust results across a large patient cohort and is suggested as a suitable substitution for TFSS in the PET image reconstruction process.

背景:正电子发射断层扫描(PET)数据重建过程中的散点缩放是获得定量准确、图像质量高的临床应用图像的关键因素。目前临床对散点缩放的标准是拟合单次散点模拟(SSS)估计的尾部区域,称为尾部拟合散点缩放(TFSS)。本研究旨在通过NEMA IQ幻影调查和包括500名患者在内的使用长轴视场(LAFOV) PET的患者队列,比较最大似然散点缩放(MLSS)算法相对于TFSS。利用12个器官的摄取值研究了两种散点缩放算法之间的相对差异。此外,分析了相对于周围组织显示高活性的已知区域的邻近性。结果:NEMA图像质量幻象研究显示预期活动浓度与MLSS重建结果一致。MLSS在最大球体的吸收值为137.3±3.4 kBq/mL,在背景的吸收值为34.6±0.5 kBq/mL,与真实浓度136.6 kBq/mL和35.0 kBq/mL接近。TFSS在最大球体的吸收值为133.7±3.5 kBq/mL,背景的吸收值为33.0±0.9 kBq/mL。MLSS在寒冷地区的吸收量高于TFSS。平均恢复系数(RCmean)显示,在整个幻体球体上,MLSS相对于TFSS的系数一般更接近1。患者研究的结果显示,当通过12个器官调查器官摄取时,数值相对差异低于2%。结论:在临床常规中,MLSS可提供与标准选择方法TFSS相当的高图像质量。幻影研究表明,相对于已知的活性浓度,MLSS准确地提供了摄取值,但在冷球和插入物中准确性较低。MLSS在大量患者队列中提供了可靠的结果,并被认为是PET图像重建过程中TFSS的合适替代品。
{"title":"Large scale comparison of maximum likelihood scatter scaling and tail-fitted scatter scaling in LAFOV PET/CT.","authors":"Nanna Overbeck, Søren Holm, Mohammadreza Teimoorisichani, Maurizio Conti, Thomas Lund Andersen, Flemming Littrup Andersen","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00796-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00796-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scatter scaling during the reconstruction of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data is a crucial element for obtaining clinically applicable images with accurate quantification and high image quality. The current clinical standard for scatter scaling is fitting the tail regions of the single scatter simulation (SSS) estimate, which is termed Tail-Fitted Scatter Scaling (TFSS). This study aims to compare a Maximum Likelihood Scatter Scaling (MLSS) algorithm relative to TFSS using a NEMA IQ phantom investigation and a patient cohort including 500 patients using long axial Field-of-View (LAFOV) PET. The relative difference between the two scatter scaling algorithms was investigated using uptake values of 12 organs. Furthermore, the proximity of known regions showing high activity relative to the surrounding tissue was analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NEMA image quality phantom study showed agreement between the expected activity concentration and the MLSS reconstructions. MLSS showed uptake values of 137.3 ± 3.4 kBq/mL in the largest sphere and 34.6 ± 0.5 kBq/mL in the background, closely matching the true concentrations of 136.6 kBq/mL and 35.0 kBq/mL, respectively. TFSS provided uptake values of 133.7 ± 3.5 kBq/mL in the largest sphere and 33.0 ± 0.9 kBq/mL in the background. MLSS showed higher uptake in the cold areas relative to TFSS. Mean recovery coefficients (RC<sub>mean</sub>) showed that MLSS generally had coefficients closer to 1 relative to TFSS across the spheres of the phantom. The findings of the patient study showed a numeric relative difference below 2% when investigating organ uptake through the 12 organs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MLSS provided results of high image quality comparable to the standard method of choice, TFSS, in the clinical routine. The phantom study showed that MLSS provided uptake values accurately relative to the known activity concentration, however less accurate within the cold sphere and insert. MLSS was found to provide robust results across a large patient cohort and is suggested as a suitable substitution for TFSS in the PET image reconstruction process.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480279/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145184979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimization of 99mTc-SPECT in the presence of 90Y for radioembolization. 90Y存在下99mTc-SPECT放射栓塞的优化。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00798-5
Camiel E M Kerckhaert, Martijn M A Dietze, Rob van Rooij, Marjolein B M Meddens, Niek Wijnen, Maarten L J Smits, Marnix G E H Lam, Hugo W A M de Jong

Background: 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) imaging is part of the standard work-up procedure for radioembolization using 90Y microspheres. In certain scenarios, it may be warranted to visualize the distribution of 99mTc in co-presence of 90Y, for example when validating intra-procedural 99mTc-MAA imaging after 90Y-therapy to enable single-session radioembolization. Another instance involves additional 99mTc-MAA administration during the therapeutic procedure itself, e.g. when initial imaging reveals insufficient targeting of a specific liver segment. In these situations, crosstalk from 90Y can result in reduced 99mTc image quality and quantitative accuracy. This study investigates the feasibility and optimal method of 99mTc SPECT imaging from combined 99mTc+90Y data using phantom experiments.

Results: An anthropomorphic torso phantom with two liver tumor inserts was filled with 99mTc without (single-isotope) and with 90Y (dual-isotope) in various activities and isotope concentrations. Three collimators (low energy high resolution: LEHR, medium energy: ME, and high energy: HE) and three methods to compensate for 90Y crosstalk in the 99mTc photo peak window (Monte Carlo-based, dual-energy-window and triple-energy-window correction) were evaluated. No substantial dead-time effects were observed in the clinically relevant activity range, up to approximately 12 GBq 99mTc+90Y (ratio 1:20) with LEHR, 29 GBq with ME and > 30 GBq with HE. Compared to the clinical standard (single-isotope 99mTc imaging with LEHR collimator), contrast recovery typically decreased from 70.0 ± 1.3% to 49.0 ± 0.9% (LEHR), 61.2 ± 1.5% (ME) or 62.1 ± 1.4% (HE) due to 90Y crosstalk. Compensation methods increased contrast recovery, with Monte Carlo-based correction combined with a ME or HE collimator yielding the best recovery at 68.5 ± 1.6% and 68.3 ± 1.5%, respectively. Visual image quality in terms of resolution and scatter contamination was superior when using a ME collimator. Lung shunt fractions were also severely affected by 90Y crosstalk when using LEHR, but could be effectively mitigated using a ME or HE collimator.

Conclusion: 99mTc imaging in the presence of 90Y leads to substantial image degradation due to crosstalk effects. Monte Carlo-based crosstalk compensation in combination with a ME or HE collimator was identified as the most accurate, robust and visually optimal reconstruction method for 99mTc SPECT from dual-isotope data.

背景:99mtc巨聚集白蛋白(MAA)成像是使用90Y微球放射栓塞的标准检查程序的一部分。在某些情况下,可能需要在90Y同时存在的情况下可视化99mTc的分布,例如,在90Y治疗后验证术中99mTc- maa成像以实现单次放射栓塞。另一个例子涉及在治疗过程中额外给药99mTc-MAA,例如当初始成像显示特定肝段靶向不足时。在这些情况下,来自90Y的串扰可能导致99mTc图像质量和定量精度降低。本研究通过幻像实验探讨了99mTc+90Y组合数据进行99mTc SPECT成像的可行性和最佳方法。结果:一个具有两个肝脏肿瘤插入的仿人躯干假体充满了不同活性和同位素浓度的99mTc(无单同位素)和90Y(双同位素)。评估了三种准直器(低能量高分辨率:LEHR,中能量:ME和高能:HE)和三种补偿99mTc光峰窗口90Y串扰的方法(基于蒙特卡罗的、双能量窗口和三能量窗口校正)。在临床相关活动范围内未观察到实质性的死期效应,LEHR组高达约12 GBq 99mTc+90Y(比例1:20),ME组为29 GBq, HE组为30 GBq。与临床标准(LEHR准直器单同位素99mTc成像)相比,由于90Y串扰,对比度恢复通常从70.0±1.3%下降到49.0±0.9% (LEHR), 61.2±1.5% (ME)或62.1±1.4% (HE)。补偿方法提高了对比度恢复,蒙特卡罗校正结合ME或HE准直器的对比度恢复效果最好,分别为68.5±1.6%和68.3±1.5%。当使用ME准直器时,在分辨率和散射污染方面的视觉图像质量是优越的。当使用LEHR时,肺分流分数也受到90Y串扰的严重影响,但可以使用ME或HE准直器有效地减轻。结论:99mTc成像在90Y存在下,由于串扰效应导致图像严重退化。基于蒙特卡罗的串扰补偿结合ME或HE准直器被认为是最准确、鲁棒和视觉最优的99mTc双同位素SPECT重建方法。
{"title":"Optimization of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-SPECT in the presence of <sup>90</sup>Y for radioembolization.","authors":"Camiel E M Kerckhaert, Martijn M A Dietze, Rob van Rooij, Marjolein B M Meddens, Niek Wijnen, Maarten L J Smits, Marnix G E H Lam, Hugo W A M de Jong","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00798-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00798-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>99m</sup>Tc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) imaging is part of the standard work-up procedure for radioembolization using <sup>90</sup>Y microspheres. In certain scenarios, it may be warranted to visualize the distribution of <sup>99m</sup>Tc in co-presence of <sup>90</sup>Y, for example when validating intra-procedural <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA imaging after <sup>90</sup>Y-therapy to enable single-session radioembolization. Another instance involves additional <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA administration during the therapeutic procedure itself, e.g. when initial imaging reveals insufficient targeting of a specific liver segment. In these situations, crosstalk from <sup>90</sup>Y can result in reduced <sup>99m</sup>Tc image quality and quantitative accuracy. This study investigates the feasibility and optimal method of <sup>99m</sup>Tc SPECT imaging from combined <sup>99m</sup>Tc+<sup>90</sup>Y data using phantom experiments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An anthropomorphic torso phantom with two liver tumor inserts was filled with <sup>99m</sup>Tc without (single-isotope) and with <sup>90</sup>Y (dual-isotope) in various activities and isotope concentrations. Three collimators (low energy high resolution: LEHR, medium energy: ME, and high energy: HE) and three methods to compensate for <sup>90</sup>Y crosstalk in the <sup>99m</sup>Tc photo peak window (Monte Carlo-based, dual-energy-window and triple-energy-window correction) were evaluated. No substantial dead-time effects were observed in the clinically relevant activity range, up to approximately 12 GBq <sup>99m</sup>Tc+<sup>90</sup>Y (ratio 1:20) with LEHR, 29 GBq with ME and > 30 GBq with HE. Compared to the clinical standard (single-isotope <sup>99m</sup>Tc imaging with LEHR collimator), contrast recovery typically decreased from 70.0 ± 1.3% to 49.0 ± 0.9% (LEHR), 61.2 ± 1.5% (ME) or 62.1 ± 1.4% (HE) due to <sup>90</sup>Y crosstalk. Compensation methods increased contrast recovery, with Monte Carlo-based correction combined with a ME or HE collimator yielding the best recovery at 68.5 ± 1.6% and 68.3 ± 1.5%, respectively. Visual image quality in terms of resolution and scatter contamination was superior when using a ME collimator. Lung shunt fractions were also severely affected by <sup>90</sup>Y crosstalk when using LEHR, but could be effectively mitigated using a ME or HE collimator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>99m</sup>Tc imaging in the presence of <sup>90</sup>Y leads to substantial image degradation due to crosstalk effects. Monte Carlo-based crosstalk compensation in combination with a ME or HE collimator was identified as the most accurate, robust and visually optimal reconstruction method for <sup>99m</sup>Tc SPECT from dual-isotope data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Phantom imaging demonstration of positronium lifetime with a long axial field‑of‑view PET/CT and 124I. 更正:用长轴视场PET/CT和124I成像显示正电子寿命。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00801-z
Lorenzo Mercolli, William M Steinberger, Narendra Rathod, Maurizio Conti, Paweł Moskal, Axel Rominger, Robert Seifert, Kuangyu Shi, Ewa Ł Stępień, Hasan Sari
{"title":"Correction: Phantom imaging demonstration of positronium lifetime with a long axial field‑of‑view PET/CT and <sup>124</sup>I.","authors":"Lorenzo Mercolli, William M Steinberger, Narendra Rathod, Maurizio Conti, Paweł Moskal, Axel Rominger, Robert Seifert, Kuangyu Shi, Ewa Ł Stępień, Hasan Sari","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00801-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00801-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443642/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing dosimetry in Y-90 microsphere radioembolization: GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo simulation versus conventional methods for high-volume setting. 优化Y-90微球放射栓塞的剂量学:gpu加速蒙特卡罗模拟与常规方法的高容量设置。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00794-9
Liu Hongming, Liang Ziwei, Hu Ziyi, Qu Shuiyin, Hu Ankang, Yan ShuChang, Wu Zhen, Zhang Hui, Li Junli, Qiu Rui
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Yttrium-90 (<sup>90</sup>Y) microsphere radioembolization has shown unique advantages in treating both primary and metastatic liver cancer and was introduced into China in 2022. Despite the development of various dosimetric models-ranging from empirical to voxel-based approaches-practical implementation remains challenging. With over 370,000 new liver cancer cases annually and limited access to certified <sup>90</sup>Y treatment centers, Chinese interventional oncology departments face increasing pressure to balance dosimetric accuracy with clinical efficiency. This study aims to develop a GPU-based fast Monte Carlo project for accurate voxel-level dose calculation and to evaluate its performance alongside existing dosimetric strategies, with the goal of supporting optimized clinical workflows in high-volume settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A fast Monte Carlo simulation algorithm was developed using Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) acceleration and applied retrospectively to eight patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer. The dosimetric performance of the GPU-based approach was compared against direct Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) formalism, the Voxel S-value (VSV) method, and the Local Energy Deposition (LED) model. Voxel- and organ-level dose accuracy were quantified using metrics such as Mean Absolute Relative Error (MARE), Relative Standard Deviation (RSD), and D95 in dose volume histogram. Statistical comparisons were conducted using Shapiro-Wilk normality tests and repeated measures ANOVA to assess inter-method differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GPU-based Monte Carlo code demonstrated high accuracy and computational efficiency. Using direct MC simulation as the reference, the GPU-based approach yielded the lowest voxel-level variability, with median RSDs in high-activity transverse regions reaching - 1.13%, indicating superior consistency. Corresponding MARE were 4.53% for the GPU method, compared to 6.71% for VSV and 49.36% for LED, confirming its dosimetric reliability. At the organ level, the GPU-based method achieved RSDs of 0.35% ± 0.80% (tumor), -0.45% ± 0.76% (liver), 1.41% ± 4.45% (lung), and - 1.43% ± 1.23% (spleen), significantly outperforming alternative models. Notably, VSV and LED substantially underestimated lung dose (-52.19% ± 23.87%, -53.71 ± 22.17%), highlighting their limited applicability in heterogeneous regions. In contrast, the dose of spleen (F = 3.26, p = 0.069) and kidneys (F = 3.22, p = 0.071) did not show statistically significant differences between methods. In terms of computational performance, the GPU-based code delivered a remarkable 1,296-fold speed-up over traditional MC simulations, enabling efficient voxel-level dosimetry suitable for clinical workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation provides a highly accurate and computatio
背景:钇-90 (90Y)微球放射栓塞治疗原发性和转移性肝癌具有独特的优势,并于2022年引入中国。尽管发展了各种剂量学模型,从经验到基于体素的方法,但实际实施仍然具有挑战性。由于每年肝癌新发病例超过37万例,且获得认证的90Y治疗中心的机会有限,中国介入肿瘤科面临着越来越大的压力,需要平衡剂量测定的准确性和临床效率。本研究旨在开发一个基于gpu的快速蒙特卡罗项目,用于准确的体素水平剂量计算,并与现有剂量学策略一起评估其性能,目标是支持高容量环境下优化的临床工作流程。方法:采用图形处理单元(GPU)加速开发快速蒙特卡罗模拟算法,并对8例确诊为肝细胞癌或转移性结直肠癌的患者进行回顾性分析。将基于gpu的方法的剂量学性能与直接蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟、医学内辐射剂量(MIRD)形式化、体素s值(VSV)方法和局部能量沉积(LED)模型进行了比较。使用剂量体积直方图中的平均绝对相对误差(MARE)、相对标准偏差(RSD)和D95等指标量化体素和器官水平的剂量准确性。统计学比较采用夏皮罗-威尔克正态检验和重复测量方差分析来评估方法间的差异。结果:基于gpu的蒙特卡罗代码具有较高的准确率和计算效率。以直接MC模拟为参考,基于gpu的方法获得了最低的体素级变异性,高活动横向区域的中位数rsd达到- 1.13%,表明一致性较好。GPU法对应的MARE为4.53%,VSV法为6.71%,LED法为49.36%,证实了其剂量学的可靠性。在器官水平上,基于gpu的方法的rsd为0.35%±0.80%(肿瘤),-0.45%±0.76%(肝脏),1.41%±4.45%(肺)和- 1.43%±1.23%(脾脏),显著优于其他模型。值得注意的是,VSV和LED明显低估了肺剂量(-52.19%±23.87%,-53.71±22.17%),突出了它们在异质区域的局限性。脾(F = 3.26, p = 0.069)和肾(F = 3.22, p = 0.071)两种方法的剂量差异无统计学意义。在计算性能方面,基于gpu的代码比传统MC模拟的速度提高了1,296倍,实现了适用于临床工作流程的高效体素级剂量测定。结论:基于gpu的快速蒙特卡罗模拟为90Y放射栓塞的体素剂量测定提供了一种高度精确和计算效率高的工具。它能够精确估计肿瘤和肺剂量,显著减少处理时间和硬件需求,在最大限度地降低放射性肺炎风险和支持高通量工作流程方面提供明显的临床优势。重要的是,一种分层的剂量学建模方法——选择简化的方法,如VSV或LED,用于小的、包含良好的病变,并保留基于gpu的蒙特卡罗用于解剖复杂或异质病例——可以优化准确性和效率之间的平衡。未来的工作将集中在大规模验证和规范化针对肿瘤形态和治疗范围的模型选择标准,以推进肝脏定向治疗的个性化剂量学计划。临床试验号:不适用。
{"title":"Optimizing dosimetry in Y-90 microsphere radioembolization: GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo simulation versus conventional methods for high-volume setting.","authors":"Liu Hongming, Liang Ziwei, Hu Ziyi, Qu Shuiyin, Hu Ankang, Yan ShuChang, Wu Zhen, Zhang Hui, Li Junli, Qiu Rui","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00794-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00794-9","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Yttrium-90 (&lt;sup&gt;90&lt;/sup&gt;Y) microsphere radioembolization has shown unique advantages in treating both primary and metastatic liver cancer and was introduced into China in 2022. Despite the development of various dosimetric models-ranging from empirical to voxel-based approaches-practical implementation remains challenging. With over 370,000 new liver cancer cases annually and limited access to certified &lt;sup&gt;90&lt;/sup&gt;Y treatment centers, Chinese interventional oncology departments face increasing pressure to balance dosimetric accuracy with clinical efficiency. This study aims to develop a GPU-based fast Monte Carlo project for accurate voxel-level dose calculation and to evaluate its performance alongside existing dosimetric strategies, with the goal of supporting optimized clinical workflows in high-volume settings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A fast Monte Carlo simulation algorithm was developed using Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) acceleration and applied retrospectively to eight patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer. The dosimetric performance of the GPU-based approach was compared against direct Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) formalism, the Voxel S-value (VSV) method, and the Local Energy Deposition (LED) model. Voxel- and organ-level dose accuracy were quantified using metrics such as Mean Absolute Relative Error (MARE), Relative Standard Deviation (RSD), and D95 in dose volume histogram. Statistical comparisons were conducted using Shapiro-Wilk normality tests and repeated measures ANOVA to assess inter-method differences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The GPU-based Monte Carlo code demonstrated high accuracy and computational efficiency. Using direct MC simulation as the reference, the GPU-based approach yielded the lowest voxel-level variability, with median RSDs in high-activity transverse regions reaching - 1.13%, indicating superior consistency. Corresponding MARE were 4.53% for the GPU method, compared to 6.71% for VSV and 49.36% for LED, confirming its dosimetric reliability. At the organ level, the GPU-based method achieved RSDs of 0.35% ± 0.80% (tumor), -0.45% ± 0.76% (liver), 1.41% ± 4.45% (lung), and - 1.43% ± 1.23% (spleen), significantly outperforming alternative models. Notably, VSV and LED substantially underestimated lung dose (-52.19% ± 23.87%, -53.71 ± 22.17%), highlighting their limited applicability in heterogeneous regions. In contrast, the dose of spleen (F = 3.26, p = 0.069) and kidneys (F = 3.22, p = 0.071) did not show statistically significant differences between methods. In terms of computational performance, the GPU-based code delivered a remarkable 1,296-fold speed-up over traditional MC simulations, enabling efficient voxel-level dosimetry suitable for clinical workflows.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;The GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation provides a highly accurate and computatio","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401777/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144947103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging physics and practice: evaluating sensitivity, septal penetration, and detector dead time in terbium-161 gamma-camera imaging. 连接物理与实践:评估灵敏度、间隔穿透性和探测器死区时间在铽-161伽马相机成像。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-025-00792-x
Frida Westerbergh, Lisa McDougall, Philipp Ritt, Julia G Fricke, Nicholas P van der Meulen, Cristina Müller, Roger Schibli, Damian Wild, Peter Bernhardt

Introduction/aim: Terbium-161 (161Tb) has emerged as a promising therapeutic radionuclide, yet standardized imaging guidelines are lacking. This study aimed to characterize a SPECT/CT system, currently used in an ongoing clinical trial (BETA PLUS; NCT05359146), focusing on sensitivity, septal penetration, and dead-time effects.

Methods: Measurements were conducted on a Siemens Symbia Intevo system using two collimators: low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) and medium-energy low-penetration (MELP). Two energy windows were evaluated: 75 keV ± 10% and 48 keV ± 20%. Planar sensitivity and penetration were assessed using a 161Tb-filled Petri dish. Penetration fractions were determined as a function of distance for each collimator-window combination. Dead time was measured intrinsically for each detector using a set of 161Tb point sources. SPECT measurements of a homogenous cylinder phantom were performed to assess count rate performance and predict activity levels at which dead-time effects could occur. To evaluate the potential impact of dead time in patient imaging, SPECT projection data from patients treated with 1 GBq of [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 (n = 8) was analyzed.

Results: Sensitivity was comparable for both collimators at 75 keV (LEHR: 15.7 cps/MBq, MELP: 18.5 cps/MBq) and increased at 48 keV (LEHR: 44.4 cps/MBq, MELP: 67.9 cps/MBq). Maximum penetration occurred at 75 keV with the LEHR collimator (7.5% at 10 cm). In acquired spectra, more than half of the detected counts (51.6%) appeared above the 75 keV window with LEHR, compared to only 12.2% with MELP. Dead-time analyses revealed non-linear detector responses at wide-spectrum count rates exceeding 93 kcps, corresponding to in-field activities of 1.4-2.0 GBq for LEHR and 1.7-2.2 GBq for MELP. The dead-time constant was determined to 0.42 µs for both detector heads, however, the maximum recorded count rate differed significantly (384 kcps vs. 546 kcps). The median and maximum wide-spectrum count rate for patients treated with [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 was estimated to ~ 20 and ~ 40 kcps per GBq 3 h p.i., respectively, when imaged with LEHR, corresponding to a maximum estimated dead-time loss of 1.7%.

Conclusions: While high-quality 161Tb SPECT imaging is feasible, careful consideration is essential; the wide range of photons emitted will produce a higher wide-spectrum count rate as compared to 177Lu. The use of low-energy collimators increases penetration and scatter, impairing quantitative accuracy and elevating the wide-spectrum count rate, which may intensify dead-time effects. At therapeutic activity levels (e.g., 7.4 GBq), dead time should be closely monitored to ensure reliable quantification.

引言/目的:Terbium-161 (161Tb)已成为一种有前景的治疗放射性核素,但缺乏标准化的成像指南。本研究旨在表征一种SPECT/CT系统,该系统目前用于一项正在进行的临床试验(BETA PLUS; NCT05359146),重点关注灵敏度、间隔穿透和死区效应。方法:在西门子Symbia Intevo系统上使用低能量高分辨率(LEHR)和中能量低穿透(MELP)两种准直器进行测量。评估两个能量窗:75 keV±10%和48 keV±20%。使用161tb填充的培养皿评估平面灵敏度和穿透性。穿透分数作为每个准直器-窗口组合的距离函数来确定。用一组161Tb的点源测量了每个探测器的死区时间。进行了均匀圆柱体幻影的SPECT测量,以评估计数率性能并预测可能发生死区效应的活动水平。为了评估死亡时间对患者成像的潜在影响,对接受1 GBq [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3治疗的患者(n = 8)的SPECT投影数据进行分析。结果:两种准直器在75 keV时灵敏度相当(LEHR: 15.7 cps/MBq, MELP: 18.5 cps/MBq),在48 keV时灵敏度增加(LEHR: 44.4 cps/MBq, MELP: 67.9 cps/MBq)。最大穿透发生在75kev, LEHR准直器在10cm处(7.5%)。在获得的光谱中,LEHR超过一半(51.6%)的检测计数出现在75 keV窗口以上,而MELP只有12.2%。死区时间分析显示,宽谱计数率超过93 kcps的非线性探测器响应,对应于LEHR的1.4-2.0 GBq和MELP的1.7-2.2 GBq。两个检测器头的死区时间常数均为0.42µs,然而,最大记录计数率差异显著(384 kcps vs. 546 kcps)。当使用LEHR成像时,接受[161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3治疗的患者的中位和最大宽谱计数率估计分别为~ 20和~ 40 kcps / GBq 3 h p.i,对应于最大估计死期损失为1.7%。结论:虽然高质量的161Tb SPECT成像是可行的,但必须仔细考虑;与177Lu相比,宽范围的光子发射将产生更高的宽光谱计数率。低能准直器的使用增加了穿透和散射,降低了定量精度,提高了宽谱计数率,这可能会加剧死区效应。在治疗活动水平(例如,7.4 GBq),死区时间应密切监测,以确保可靠的量化。
{"title":"Bridging physics and practice: evaluating sensitivity, septal penetration, and detector dead time in terbium-161 gamma-camera imaging.","authors":"Frida Westerbergh, Lisa McDougall, Philipp Ritt, Julia G Fricke, Nicholas P van der Meulen, Cristina Müller, Roger Schibli, Damian Wild, Peter Bernhardt","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00792-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40658-025-00792-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aim: </strong>Terbium-161 (<sup>161</sup>Tb) has emerged as a promising therapeutic radionuclide, yet standardized imaging guidelines are lacking. This study aimed to characterize a SPECT/CT system, currently used in an ongoing clinical trial (BETA PLUS; NCT05359146), focusing on sensitivity, septal penetration, and dead-time effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were conducted on a Siemens Symbia Intevo system using two collimators: low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) and medium-energy low-penetration (MELP). Two energy windows were evaluated: 75 keV ± 10% and 48 keV ± 20%. Planar sensitivity and penetration were assessed using a <sup>161</sup>Tb-filled Petri dish. Penetration fractions were determined as a function of distance for each collimator-window combination. Dead time was measured intrinsically for each detector using a set of <sup>161</sup>Tb point sources. SPECT measurements of a homogenous cylinder phantom were performed to assess count rate performance and predict activity levels at which dead-time effects could occur. To evaluate the potential impact of dead time in patient imaging, SPECT projection data from patients treated with 1 GBq of [<sup>161</sup>Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 (n = 8) was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity was comparable for both collimators at 75 keV (LEHR: 15.7 cps/MBq, MELP: 18.5 cps/MBq) and increased at 48 keV (LEHR: 44.4 cps/MBq, MELP: 67.9 cps/MBq). Maximum penetration occurred at 75 keV with the LEHR collimator (7.5% at 10 cm). In acquired spectra, more than half of the detected counts (51.6%) appeared above the 75 keV window with LEHR, compared to only 12.2% with MELP. Dead-time analyses revealed non-linear detector responses at wide-spectrum count rates exceeding 93 kcps, corresponding to in-field activities of 1.4-2.0 GBq for LEHR and 1.7-2.2 GBq for MELP. The dead-time constant was determined to 0.42 µs for both detector heads, however, the maximum recorded count rate differed significantly (384 kcps vs. 546 kcps). The median and maximum wide-spectrum count rate for patients treated with [<sup>161</sup>Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 was estimated to ~ 20 and ~ 40 kcps per GBq 3 h p.i., respectively, when imaged with LEHR, corresponding to a maximum estimated dead-time loss of 1.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While high-quality <sup>161</sup>Tb SPECT imaging is feasible, careful consideration is essential; the wide range of photons emitted will produce a higher wide-spectrum count rate as compared to <sup>177</sup>Lu. The use of low-energy collimators increases penetration and scatter, impairing quantitative accuracy and elevating the wide-spectrum count rate, which may intensify dead-time effects. At therapeutic activity levels (e.g., 7.4 GBq), dead time should be closely monitored to ensure reliable quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144947143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
EJNMMI Physics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1