首页 > 最新文献

Epilepsia最新文献

英文 中文
POLR3B is associated with a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with myoclonic-atonic seizures and ataxia POLR3B 与伴有肌阵挛性失张力发作和共济失调的发育性癫痫性脑病有关。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18115
Joseph D. Symonds, Kristen L. Park, Cyril Mignot, Stewart Macleod, Martin Armstrong, Houman Ashrafian, Geneviève Bernard, Kathleen Brown, Andreas Brunklaus, Mary Callaghan, Georg Classen, Julie S. Cohen, Ioana Cutcutache, Jean-Madeleine de Sainte Agathe, David Dyment, Katherine S. Elliot, Arnaud Isapof, Shelagh Joss, Boris Keren, Michael Marble, Amy McTague, Matthew Osmond, Matthew Page, Marc Planes, Konrad Platzer, Sylvia Redon, James Reese, Margarita Saenz, Constance Smith-Hicks, Daniel Stobo, Christian Stockhaus, Marie-Laure Vuillaume, Nicole I. Wolf, Emma L. Wakeling, Grace Yoon, Julian C. Knight, Sameer M. Zuberi

Objective

POLR3B encodes the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase III, which is essential for transcription of small non-coding RNAs. Biallelic pathogenic variants in POLR3B are associated with an inherited hypomyelinating leukodystrophy. Recently, de novo heterozygous variants in POLR3B were reported in six individuals with ataxia, spasticity, and demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. Three of these individuals had epileptic seizures.

The aim of this article is to precisely define the epilepsy phenotype associated with de novo heterozygous POLR3B variants.

Methods

We used online gene-matching tools to identify 13 patients with de novo POLR3B variants. We systematically collected genotype and phenotype data from clinicians using two standardized proformas.

Results

All 13 patients had novel POLR3B variants. Twelve of 13 variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic as per American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria. Patients presented with generalized myoclonic, myoclonic-atonic, atypical absence, or tonic-clonic seizures between the ages of six months and 4 years. Epilepsy was classified as epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures (EMAtS) in seven patients and “probable EMAtS” in two more.

Seizures were treatment resistant in all cases. Three patients became seizure-free. All patients had some degree of developmental delay or intellectual disability. In most cases developmental delay was apparent before the onset of seizures. Three of 13 cases were reported to have developmental stagnation or regression in association with seizure onset.

Treatments for epilepsy that were reported by clinicians to be effective were: sodium valproate, which was effective in five of nine patients (5/9) who tried it; rufinamide (2/3); and ketogenic diet (2/3).

Additional features were ataxia/incoordination (8/13); microcephaly (7/13); peripheral neuropathy (4/13), and spasticity/hypertonia (6/13).

Significance

POLR3B is a novel genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) in which EMAtS is the predominant epilepsy phenotype. Ataxia, neuropathy, and hypertonia may be variously observed in these patients.

目的POLR3B 编码 RNA 聚合酶 III 的第二大亚基,是转录小型非编码 RNA 所必需的。POLR3B 的双叶致病变体与遗传性骨髓营养不良性白质营养不良症有关。最近,POLR3B 的新发杂合变体在六名患有共济失调、痉挛和脱髓鞘性周围神经病变的患者中被报道。其中三人有癫痫发作。本文旨在精确界定与POLR3B新发杂合变异相关的癫痫表型:方法:我们使用在线基因配对工具确定了 13 名患有新发 POLR3B 变异的患者。方法:我们使用在线基因匹配工具确定了 13 名新发 POLR3B 变异患者,并使用两种标准化表格系统地收集了临床医生提供的基因型和表型数据:结果:所有 13 名患者都有新的 POLR3B 变异。根据美国医学遗传学会(ACMG)的标准,13 个变异体中有 12 个被归类为致病或可能致病。患者在6个月至4岁期间出现全身肌阵挛、肌阵挛-失张力、不典型失神或强直-阵挛发作。七名患者的癫痫被归类为肌阵挛性-失张力癫痫(EMAtS),另有两名患者被归类为 "可能的EMAtS"。所有病例的癫痫发作都具有抗药性。三名患者不再发作。所有患者都有一定程度的发育迟缓或智力障碍。在大多数病例中,发育迟缓在癫痫发作前就已显现。据报告,13 例患者中有 3 例在癫痫发作时出现发育停滞或倒退。据临床医生报告,有效的癫痫治疗方法有:丙戊酸钠(9名患者中有5名(5/9)尝试过)、鲁非那胺(2/3)和生酮饮食(2/3)。其他特征包括共济失调/不协调(8/13)、小头畸形(7/13)、周围神经病变(4/13)和痉挛/过度紧张(6/13):POLR3B是一种新型遗传性发育性癫痫脑病(DEE),其中EMAtS是主要的癫痫表型。这些患者可能会出现不同程度的共济失调、神经病变和肌张力过高。
{"title":"POLR3B is associated with a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with myoclonic-atonic seizures and ataxia","authors":"Joseph D. Symonds,&nbsp;Kristen L. Park,&nbsp;Cyril Mignot,&nbsp;Stewart Macleod,&nbsp;Martin Armstrong,&nbsp;Houman Ashrafian,&nbsp;Geneviève Bernard,&nbsp;Kathleen Brown,&nbsp;Andreas Brunklaus,&nbsp;Mary Callaghan,&nbsp;Georg Classen,&nbsp;Julie S. Cohen,&nbsp;Ioana Cutcutache,&nbsp;Jean-Madeleine de Sainte Agathe,&nbsp;David Dyment,&nbsp;Katherine S. Elliot,&nbsp;Arnaud Isapof,&nbsp;Shelagh Joss,&nbsp;Boris Keren,&nbsp;Michael Marble,&nbsp;Amy McTague,&nbsp;Matthew Osmond,&nbsp;Matthew Page,&nbsp;Marc Planes,&nbsp;Konrad Platzer,&nbsp;Sylvia Redon,&nbsp;James Reese,&nbsp;Margarita Saenz,&nbsp;Constance Smith-Hicks,&nbsp;Daniel Stobo,&nbsp;Christian Stockhaus,&nbsp;Marie-Laure Vuillaume,&nbsp;Nicole I. Wolf,&nbsp;Emma L. Wakeling,&nbsp;Grace Yoon,&nbsp;Julian C. Knight,&nbsp;Sameer M. Zuberi","doi":"10.1111/epi.18115","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18115","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p><i>POLR3B</i> encodes the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase III, which is essential for transcription of small non-coding RNAs. Biallelic pathogenic variants in <i>POLR3B</i> are associated with an inherited hypomyelinating leukodystrophy. Recently, <i>de novo</i> heterozygous variants in <i>POLR3B</i> were reported in six individuals with ataxia, spasticity, and demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. Three of these individuals had epileptic seizures.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of this article is to precisely define the epilepsy phenotype associated with <i>de novo</i> heterozygous <i>POLR3B</i> variants.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used online gene-matching tools to identify 13 patients with <i>de novo</i> <i>POLR3B</i> variants. We systematically collected genotype and phenotype data from clinicians using two standardized proformas.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>All 13 patients had novel <i>POLR3B</i> variants. Twelve of 13 variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic as per American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria. Patients presented with generalized myoclonic, myoclonic-atonic, atypical absence, or tonic-clonic seizures between the ages of six months and 4 years. Epilepsy was classified as epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures (EMAtS) in seven patients and “probable EMAtS” in two more.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Seizures were treatment resistant in all cases. Three patients became seizure-free. All patients had some degree of developmental delay or intellectual disability. In most cases developmental delay was apparent before the onset of seizures. Three of 13 cases were reported to have developmental stagnation or regression in association with seizure onset.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Treatments for epilepsy that were reported by clinicians to be effective were: sodium valproate, which was effective in five of nine patients (5/9) who tried it; rufinamide (2/3); and ketogenic diet (2/3).</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Additional features were ataxia/incoordination (8/13); microcephaly (7/13); peripheral neuropathy (4/13), and spasticity/hypertonia (6/13).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p><i>POLR3B</i> is a novel genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) in which EMAtS is the predominant epilepsy phenotype. Ataxia, neuropathy, and hypertonia may be variously observed in these patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3303-3323"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18115","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical utility of ultra long-term subcutaneous electroencephalographic monitoring in drug-resistant epilepsies: a “real world” pilot study 超长期皮下脑电监测对耐药性癫痫的临床实用性:一项 "真实世界 "试点研究。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18121
Guido Rubboli, Margrete Halvorsen Bø, Kristin Alfstad, Sidsel Armand Larsen, Mads Due Holm Jacobsen, Maria Vlachou, Sigge Weisdorf, Rune Rasmussen, Arild Egge, Oliver Henning, Morten Lossius, Sandor Beniczky

Objective

This study was undertaken to assess the clinical utility, safety, and tolerability in epilepsy patients of ultra long-term monitoring with a novel subcutaneous electroencephalographic (EEG) device (sqEEG).

Methods

Five patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy were implanted (one patient bilaterally) with sqEEG. In phase 1, we assessed sqEEG sensitivity for seizure recording by recording seizures simultaneously with scalp EEG in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). sqEEG was scored either visually (v-sqEEG) or by using a semiautomatic algorithm (EpiSight; E-sqEEG). In phase 2, the patients were monitored as outpatients for 3–6 months. sqEEG data were analyzed monthly, evaluating concordance of data obtained by v-sqEEG, E-sqEEG, and patients' diaries. v-sqEEG data were used to guide treatment adjustments. sqEEG-related side effects were assessed throughout the study.

Results

In phase 1, v-sqEEG detected all seizures recorded in the EMU in all patients, whereas E-sqEEG was as effective in three patients. In the other two patients, E-sqEEG detected only a proportion or none of the seizures, respectively. Sensitivity of E-sqEEG depended on the ictal EEG features. In phase 2, a 100% concordance between E-sqEEG and v-sqEEG in seizure detection was observed for the same three patients as in phase 1. In the other two patients (one implanted bilaterally), effectiveness of E-sqEEG in detecting seizure as compared to v-sqEEG ranged from 0% to 83%. v-sqEEG showed that all patients reported in their diaries fewer seizures than they actually suffered. In four of five patients, v-sqEEG showed that the treatment adjustments had been ineffective or associated with a seizure increment. The only side effect was an infection at the implantation site in one patient.

Significance

The sqEEG system could collect reliable information on seizure activity, thus providing clinically relevant information. Sensitivity of EpiSight in detecting seizures varied across patients, depending on the ictal EEG features. sqEEG ultra long-term monitoring was feasible and well tolerated.

研究目的本研究旨在评估使用新型皮下脑电图(EEG)装置(sqEEG)对癫痫患者进行超长期监测的临床实用性、安全性和耐受性:五名耐药性局灶性癫痫患者(其中一名患者为双侧)植入了 sqEEG。在第一阶段,我们通过在癫痫监护病房(EMU)同时记录癫痫发作和头皮脑电图来评估 sqEEG 对癫痫发作记录的敏感性。sqEEG 采用目测(v-sqEEG)或半自动算法(EpiSight;E-sqEEG)进行评分。每月分析 sqEEG 数据,评估 v-sqEEG、E-sqEEG 和患者日记所获数据的一致性。v-sqEEG 数据用于指导治疗调整,在整个研究过程中评估 sqEEG 相关副作用:结果:在第一阶段,所有患者的 v-sqEEG 都能检测到 EMU 中记录的所有癫痫发作,而 E-sqEEG 对三名患者同样有效。在另外两名患者中,E-sqEEG 分别只能检测到部分或全部癫痫发作。E-sqEEG 的灵敏度取决于发作期脑电图特征。在第二阶段,与第一阶段相同的三名患者的 E-sqEEG 和 v-sqEEG 在癫痫发作检测中的一致性达到了 100%。v-sqEEG 显示,所有患者在日记中报告的癫痫发作次数均少于实际发作次数。在五名患者中,有四名患者的 v-sqEEG 显示治疗调整无效或与癫痫发作增加有关。唯一的副作用是一名患者的植入部位受到感染:意义:sqEEG 系统可以收集可靠的癫痫发作活动信息,从而提供与临床相关的信息。EpiSight 检测癫痫发作的灵敏度因患者发作期脑电图特征而异。
{"title":"Clinical utility of ultra long-term subcutaneous electroencephalographic monitoring in drug-resistant epilepsies: a “real world” pilot study","authors":"Guido Rubboli,&nbsp;Margrete Halvorsen Bø,&nbsp;Kristin Alfstad,&nbsp;Sidsel Armand Larsen,&nbsp;Mads Due Holm Jacobsen,&nbsp;Maria Vlachou,&nbsp;Sigge Weisdorf,&nbsp;Rune Rasmussen,&nbsp;Arild Egge,&nbsp;Oliver Henning,&nbsp;Morten Lossius,&nbsp;Sandor Beniczky","doi":"10.1111/epi.18121","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18121","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study was undertaken to assess the clinical utility, safety, and tolerability in epilepsy patients of ultra long-term monitoring with a novel subcutaneous electroencephalographic (EEG) device (sqEEG).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Five patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy were implanted (one patient bilaterally) with sqEEG. In phase 1, we assessed sqEEG sensitivity for seizure recording by recording seizures simultaneously with scalp EEG in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). sqEEG was scored either visually (v-sqEEG) or by using a semiautomatic algorithm (EpiSight; E-sqEEG). In phase 2, the patients were monitored as outpatients for 3–6 months. sqEEG data were analyzed monthly, evaluating concordance of data obtained by v-sqEEG, E-sqEEG, and patients' diaries. v-sqEEG data were used to guide treatment adjustments. sqEEG-related side effects were assessed throughout the study.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In phase 1, v-sqEEG detected all seizures recorded in the EMU in all patients, whereas E-sqEEG was as effective in three patients. In the other two patients, E-sqEEG detected only a proportion or none of the seizures, respectively. Sensitivity of E-sqEEG depended on the ictal EEG features. In phase 2, a 100% concordance between E-sqEEG and v-sqEEG in seizure detection was observed for the same three patients as in phase 1. In the other two patients (one implanted bilaterally), effectiveness of E-sqEEG in detecting seizure as compared to v-sqEEG ranged from 0% to 83%. v-sqEEG showed that all patients reported in their diaries fewer seizures than they actually suffered. In four of five patients, v-sqEEG showed that the treatment adjustments had been ineffective or associated with a seizure increment. The only side effect was an infection at the implantation site in one patient.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The sqEEG system could collect reliable information on seizure activity, thus providing clinically relevant information. Sensitivity of EpiSight in detecting seizures varied across patients, depending on the ictal EEG features. sqEEG ultra long-term monitoring was feasible and well tolerated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3265-3278"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18121","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of first antiseizure medication with acute health care utilization in a cohort of adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy 在一组新确诊癫痫的成年人中,首次服用抗癫痫药物与急性期医疗使用率的关系。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18133
Leah J. Blank, Parul Agarwal, Churl-Su Kwon, Kenneth Boockvar, Nathalie Jetté

Objective

Epilepsy is primarily treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs). The recommendations for first ASM in newly diagnosed epilepsy are inconsistently followed, and we sought to examine whether nonrecommended first ASM was associated with acute care utilization.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years old) with newly diagnosed epilepsy (identified using validated epilepsy/convulsion International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification codes) in 2015–2019, sampled from Marketscan's Commercial and Medicare Databases. Exposure of interest was receipt of a non-guideline-recommended ASM, and the primary outcome was acute care utilization (an emergency department visit or hospitalization after the first ASM claim). Descriptive statistics characterized covariates, and multivariable negative binominal regression models were built adjusting for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, comorbid neurologic disease (e.g., stroke), and ASM polypharmacy.

Results

Approximately 14 681 people with new epilepsy were prescribed an ASM within 1 year. The three most prescribed medications were levetiracetam (54%, n = 7912), gabapentin (10%, n = 1462), and topiramate (7%, n = 1022). Approximately 4% (n = 648) were prescribed an ASM that should be avoided, and ~74% of people with new epilepsy had an acute care visit during the follow-up period. Mean number of acute care visits during follow-up was 3.34 for “recommended” ASMs and 4.42 for ASMs that “should be avoided.” Prescription of a recommended/neutral ASM as compared to an ASM that should be avoided was associated with reduced likelihood of acute care utilization (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .77–.94). The recommended/neutral category of ASMs was not statistically significantly associated with seizure- or epilepsy-specific acute care utilization (IRR = .93, 95% CI = .79–1.09).

Significance

Adults with new epilepsy are frequent users of acute care. There remain a proportion of persons with epilepsy prescribed ASMs that guidelines suggest avoiding, and these ASMs are associated with increased likelihood of emergency department visit or hospitalization. These findings reinforce the importance of optimizing the choice of first ASM in epilepsy.

目的:癫痫主要通过抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗。新诊断的癫痫患者首次使用抗癫痫药物的建议并不一致,我们试图研究未被推荐的首次使用抗癫痫药物是否与急性护理的使用有关:我们对 2015-2019 年新诊断为癫痫的成人(≥18 岁)进行了一项回顾性队列研究(使用有效的癫痫/惊厥国际疾病分类、临床修改代码进行识别),研究样本来自 Marketscan 的商业和医疗保险数据库。关注暴露是指接受非指南推荐的 ASM,主要结果是急性护理利用率(首次 ASM 索赔后的急诊就诊或住院)。描述性统计描述了协变量的特征,并建立了多变量负二项式回归模型,对年龄、性别、Elixhauser 生病指数、合并神经系统疾病(如中风)和 ASM 多药进行了调整:约有 14 681 名新发癫痫患者在 1 年内接受了 ASM 治疗。处方最多的三种药物是左乙拉西坦(54%,n = 7912)、加巴喷丁(10%,n = 1462)和托吡酯(7%,n = 1022)。约 4% 的患者(n = 648)被开具了应避免使用的 ASM 处方,约 74% 的新发癫痫患者在随访期间接受了急诊就诊。在随访期间,"推荐 "的 ASM 平均就诊次数为 3.34 次,"应避免 "的 ASM 平均就诊次数为 4.42 次。与应避免的 ASM 相比,处方推荐/中性 ASM 与使用急症护理的可能性降低相关(发生率比 [IRR] = .85,95% 置信区间 [CI] = .77- .94)。在统计学上,推荐/中性类别的 ASM 与癫痫发作或癫痫特异性急症护理使用率无显著相关性(IRR = .93,95% CI = .79-1.09):重要意义:成人癫痫患者是急症护理的频繁使用者。仍有一部分癫痫患者被处方了指南建议避免使用的 ASMs,而这些 ASMs 与急诊科就诊或住院的可能性增加有关。这些发现强化了优化癫痫患者首次ASM选择的重要性。
{"title":"Association of first antiseizure medication with acute health care utilization in a cohort of adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy","authors":"Leah J. Blank,&nbsp;Parul Agarwal,&nbsp;Churl-Su Kwon,&nbsp;Kenneth Boockvar,&nbsp;Nathalie Jetté","doi":"10.1111/epi.18133","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18133","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Epilepsy is primarily treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs). The recommendations for first ASM in newly diagnosed epilepsy are inconsistently followed, and we sought to examine whether nonrecommended first ASM was associated with acute care utilization.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years old) with newly diagnosed epilepsy (identified using validated epilepsy/convulsion International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification codes) in 2015–2019, sampled from Marketscan's Commercial and Medicare Databases. Exposure of interest was receipt of a non-guideline-recommended ASM, and the primary outcome was acute care utilization (an emergency department visit or hospitalization after the first ASM claim). Descriptive statistics characterized covariates, and multivariable negative binominal regression models were built adjusting for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, comorbid neurologic disease (e.g., stroke), and ASM polypharmacy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Approximately 14 681 people with new epilepsy were prescribed an ASM within 1 year. The three most prescribed medications were levetiracetam (54%, <i>n</i> = 7912), gabapentin (10%, <i>n</i> = 1462), and topiramate (7%, <i>n</i> = 1022). Approximately 4% (<i>n</i> = 648) were prescribed an ASM that should be avoided, and ~74% of people with new epilepsy had an acute care visit during the follow-up period. Mean number of acute care visits during follow-up was 3.34 for “recommended” ASMs and 4.42 for ASMs that “should be avoided.” Prescription of a recommended/neutral ASM as compared to an ASM that should be avoided was associated with reduced likelihood of acute care utilization (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .77–.94). The recommended/neutral category of ASMs was not statistically significantly associated with seizure- or epilepsy-specific acute care utilization (IRR = .93, 95% CI = .79–1.09).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Adults with new epilepsy are frequent users of acute care. There remain a proportion of persons with epilepsy prescribed ASMs that guidelines suggest avoiding, and these ASMs are associated with increased likelihood of emergency department visit or hospitalization. These findings reinforce the importance of optimizing the choice of first ASM in epilepsy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3216-3223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of different oral prednisone tapering courses in adult anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A multicenter prospective cohort study 不同口服泼尼松渐减疗程对成人抗NMDAR脑炎的疗效和安全性:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18107
Linjun Cai, Gaowei Li, Ammar T. Abdulaziz, Xue Gong, Xu Liu, Xueying Kong, Kundian Guo, Aiqing Li, Jinmei Li, Dong Zhou, Zhen Hong

Objective

In adult anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, corticosteroids are commonly used as first-line treatment. However, the optimal oral prednisone tapering (OPT) following intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy remains unclear. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of different OPT courses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Methods

The CHASE study, a multicenter prospective observational cohort study, enrolled patients with autoimmune encephalitis from October 2011 to March 2023. Patients were grouped based on oral prednisone tapering course: ≤3 months (Group ≤3 month), 3–6 months (Group 3–6 months, including 3 months), and >6 months (Group > 6 months). Kaplan–Meier plots were used to analyze time to relapse and time to total recovery within 2 years.

Results

Among 666 screened patients, 171 (median [IQR] age 27 [21.0–36.5] years, 55.0% female) met selection criteria. Responders at 3 months were prevalent in Group ≤3 months (OR 7.251 [95% CI 2.252 to 23.344] and Group 3–6 months (OR, 3.857 [95% CI 1.107 to 13.440] than in Group >6 months. Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) scores at 12 months were higher in Group >6 months than in Group ≤3 months and Group 3–6 months (β, −2.329 [95% CI −3.784 to −.875]; β, −2.871 [95% CI −4.490, −1.253]). CASE seizures subscore was higher in Group >6 months than in Group 3–6 months (β, −.452 [95% CI −.788 to −.116]). No significant difference in seizure freedom rates among the groups. Adverse events were higher in Group 3–6 months and Group >6 months than in Group ≤3 months (OR 6.045 [95% CI 2.352 to 15.538]; OR 6.782 [95% CI 1.911 to 24.073]).

Significance

Longer oral prednisone courses for adult patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis did not show superior effects compared to shorter courses in improving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and CASE scores, reducing the risk of relapse within 2 years, or achieving seizure freedom. Instead, extended prednisone courses may lead to more side effects— particularly weight gain. This outcome recommends evaluating the possibility of shortening the duration of oral prednisone after a thorough patient assessment.

目的:在成人抗 N-甲基-d-天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)脑炎中,皮质类固醇通常被用作一线治疗。然而,静脉注射甲基强的松龙脉冲疗法后的最佳口服强的松减量(OPT)仍不明确。我们旨在比较不同 OPT 疗程对抗 NMDAR 脑炎的疗效和安全性:CHASE研究是一项多中心前瞻性观察性队列研究,从2011年10月至2023年3月招募了自身免疫性脑炎患者。根据患者的口服泼尼松减量疗程进行分组:≤3个月(≤3个月组)、3-6个月(3-6个月组,包括3个月)和>6个月(>6个月组)。采用卡普兰-梅耶图分析复发时间和2年内完全康复时间:在 666 名接受筛查的患者中,171 人(中位数[IQR]年龄为 27 [21.0-36.5] 岁,55.0% 为女性)符合入选标准。3个月后有反应的患者在≤3个月组和3-6个月组中的比例分别为7.251 OR [95% CI 2.252至23.344]和3.857 OR [95% CI 1.107至13.440],高于6个月以上组。自身免疫性脑炎临床评估量表(CASE)在12个月时的评分,>6个月组高于≤3个月组和3-6个月组(β,-2.329 [95% CI -3.784至-.875];β,-2.871 [95% CI -4.490,-1.253])。大于 6 个月组的 CASE 癫痫发作次评分高于 3-6 个月组(β,-.452 [95% CI -.788 to -.116])。各组的癫痫发作自由率无明显差异。3-6个月组和>6个月组的不良事件发生率高于≤3个月组(OR 6.045 [95% CI 2.352 to 15.538]; OR 6.782 [95% CI 1.911 to 24.073]):在改善改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分和CASE评分、降低2年内复发风险或实现癫痫发作自由方面,对抗NMDAR脑炎成人患者口服较长疗程的泼尼松并未显示出优于较短疗程的效果。相反,延长泼尼松疗程可能会导致更多副作用,尤其是体重增加。这一结果建议在对患者进行全面评估后,评估缩短口服泼尼松疗程的可能性。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of different oral prednisone tapering courses in adult anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A multicenter prospective cohort study","authors":"Linjun Cai,&nbsp;Gaowei Li,&nbsp;Ammar T. Abdulaziz,&nbsp;Xue Gong,&nbsp;Xu Liu,&nbsp;Xueying Kong,&nbsp;Kundian Guo,&nbsp;Aiqing Li,&nbsp;Jinmei Li,&nbsp;Dong Zhou,&nbsp;Zhen Hong","doi":"10.1111/epi.18107","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18107","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In adult anti-<i>N</i>-methyl-<span>d</span>-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, corticosteroids are commonly used as first-line treatment. However, the optimal oral prednisone tapering (OPT) following intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy remains unclear. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of different OPT courses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The CHASE study, a multicenter prospective observational cohort study, enrolled patients with autoimmune encephalitis from October 2011 to March 2023. Patients were grouped based on oral prednisone tapering course: ≤3 months (Group ≤3 month), 3–6 months (Group 3–6 months, including 3 months), and &gt;6 months (Group &gt; 6 months). Kaplan–Meier plots were used to analyze time to relapse and time to total recovery within 2 years.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 666 screened patients, 171 (median [IQR] age 27 [21.0–36.5] years, 55.0% female) met selection criteria. Responders at 3 months were prevalent in Group ≤3 months (OR 7.251 [95% CI 2.252 to 23.344] and Group 3–6 months (OR, 3.857 [95% CI 1.107 to 13.440] than in Group &gt;6 months. Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) scores at 12 months were higher in Group &gt;6 months than in Group ≤3 months and Group 3–6 months (<i>β</i>, −2.329 [95% CI −3.784 to −.875]; <i>β</i>, −2.871 [95% CI −4.490, −1.253]). CASE seizures subscore was higher in Group &gt;6 months than in Group 3–6 months (<i>β</i>, −.452 [95% CI −.788 to −.116]). No significant difference in seizure freedom rates among the groups. Adverse events were higher in Group 3–6 months and Group &gt;6 months than in Group ≤3 months (OR 6.045 [95% CI 2.352 to 15.538]; OR 6.782 [95% CI 1.911 to 24.073]).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Longer oral prednisone courses for adult patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis did not show superior effects compared to shorter courses in improving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and CASE scores, reducing the risk of relapse within 2 years, or achieving seizure freedom. Instead, extended prednisone courses may lead to more side effects— particularly weight gain. This outcome recommends evaluating the possibility of shortening the duration of oral prednisone after a thorough patient assessment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3199-3215"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A report from the Psychiatric Pediatric Issues Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy 基于共识的儿童和青少年癫痫患者焦虑和抑郁诊断与治疗建议:国际抗癫痫联盟儿科精神问题工作组的报告。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18116
Kette D. Valente, Colin Reilly, Rachel M. Carvalho, Mary Lou Smith, Marco Mula, Elaine C. Wirrell, Jo M. Wilmshurst, Nathalie Jetté, Francesco Brigo, Symon M. Kariuki, Choong Yi Fong, Yuan-Pang Wang, Guilherme V. Polanczyk, Viviane Castanho, Izabel G. Demarchi, Stéphane Auvin, Mike Kerr

The Psychiatric Pediatric Issues Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) aimed to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with epilepsy. The Task Force conducted a systematic review and identified two studies that assessed the accuracy of four screening measures for depression and anxiety symptoms compared with a psychiatric interview. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria for treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders or symptoms. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. The evidence generated by this review followed by consensus where evidence was missing generated 47 recommendations. Those with a high level of agreement (≥80%) are summarized. Diagnosis: (1) Universal screening for anxiety and depression is recommended. Closer surveillance is recommended for children after 12 years, at higher risk (e.g., suicide-related behavior), with subthreshold symptoms, and experiencing seizure worsening or therapeutic modifications. (2) Multiple sources of ascertainment and a formal screening are recommended. Clinical interviews are recommended whenever possible. The healthcare provider must always explain that symptom recognition is essential to optimize treatment outcomes and reduce morbidity. (3) Questioning about the relationship between symptoms of anxiety or depression with seizure worsening/control and behavioral adverse effects of antiseizure medications is recommended. Treatment: (1) An individualized treatment plan is recommended. (2) For mild depression, active monitoring must be considered. (3) Referral to a mental health care provider must be considered for moderate to severe depression and anxiety. (4) Clinical care pathways must be developed. (5) Psychosocial interventions must be tailored and age-appropriate. (6) Healthcare providers must monitor children with epilepsy who are prescribed antidepressants, considering symptoms and functioning that may not improve simultaneously. (7) Caregiver education is essential to ensure treatment adherence. (8) A shared-care model involving all healthcare providers is recommended for children and adolescents with epilepsy and mental health disorders. We identified clinical decisions in the management of depression and anxiety that lack solid evidence and provide consensus-based guidance to address the care of children and adolescents with epilepsy.

国际抗癫痫联盟 (ILAE) 的儿科精神问题特别工作组旨在为诊断和治疗儿童和青少年癫痫患者的焦虑和抑郁制定建议。专责小组进行了一项系统性回顾,发现有两项研究评估了四种抑郁和焦虑症状筛查措施与精神科访谈相比的准确性。九项研究符合治疗焦虑症和抑郁症或症状的资格标准。对偏倚风险和证据的确定性进行了评估。在缺乏证据的情况下,根据此次综述得出的证据和共识提出了 47 项建议。现将意见高度一致(≥80%)的建议进行总结。诊断:(1) 建议对焦虑症和抑郁症进行普遍筛查。建议对 12 岁以后、有较高风险(如自杀相关行为)、有阈下症状、发作恶化或治疗改变的儿童进行更密切的监测。(2) 建议通过多种渠道进行确认并进行正式筛查。建议尽可能进行临床访谈。医护人员必须始终解释症状识别对于优化治疗效果和降低发病率至关重要。(3) 建议询问焦虑或抑郁症状与癫痫发作恶化/控制之间的关系,以及抗癫痫药物的行为不良反应。治疗:(1)建议采用个体化治疗方案。(2) 对于轻度抑郁,必须考虑积极监测。(3) 对于中度至重度抑郁和焦虑,必须考虑转介给心理保健提供者。(4) 必须制定临床护理路径。(5) 社会心理干预必须有针对性并与年龄相适应。(6) 医疗服务提供者必须对开具抗抑郁药的癫痫患儿进行监测,考虑到症状和功能可能不会同时得到改善。(7) 照顾者的教育对确保坚持治疗至关重要。(8) 建议对患有癫痫和精神疾病的儿童和青少年采取由所有医疗服务提供者参与的共同护理模式。我们确定了在抑郁和焦虑管理方面缺乏确凿证据的临床决定,并提供了基于共识的指导,以解决儿童和青少年癫痫患者的护理问题。
{"title":"Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A report from the Psychiatric Pediatric Issues Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy","authors":"Kette D. Valente,&nbsp;Colin Reilly,&nbsp;Rachel M. Carvalho,&nbsp;Mary Lou Smith,&nbsp;Marco Mula,&nbsp;Elaine C. Wirrell,&nbsp;Jo M. Wilmshurst,&nbsp;Nathalie Jetté,&nbsp;Francesco Brigo,&nbsp;Symon M. Kariuki,&nbsp;Choong Yi Fong,&nbsp;Yuan-Pang Wang,&nbsp;Guilherme V. Polanczyk,&nbsp;Viviane Castanho,&nbsp;Izabel G. Demarchi,&nbsp;Stéphane Auvin,&nbsp;Mike Kerr","doi":"10.1111/epi.18116","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18116","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Psychiatric Pediatric Issues Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) aimed to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with epilepsy. The Task Force conducted a systematic review and identified two studies that assessed the accuracy of four screening measures for depression and anxiety symptoms compared with a psychiatric interview. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria for treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders or symptoms. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. The evidence generated by this review followed by consensus where evidence was missing generated 47 recommendations. Those with a high level of agreement (≥80%) are summarized. <i>Diagnosis</i>: (1) Universal screening for anxiety and depression is recommended. Closer surveillance is recommended for children after 12 years, at higher risk (e.g., suicide-related behavior), with subthreshold symptoms, and experiencing seizure worsening or therapeutic modifications. (2) Multiple sources of ascertainment and a formal screening are recommended. Clinical interviews are recommended whenever possible. The healthcare provider must always explain that symptom recognition is essential to optimize treatment outcomes and reduce morbidity. (3) Questioning about the relationship between symptoms of anxiety or depression with seizure worsening/control and behavioral adverse effects of antiseizure medications is recommended. <i>Treatment</i>: (1) An individualized treatment plan is recommended. (2) For mild depression, active monitoring must be considered. (3) Referral to a mental health care provider must be considered for moderate to severe depression and anxiety. (4) Clinical care pathways must be developed. (5) Psychosocial interventions must be tailored and age-appropriate. (6) Healthcare providers must monitor children with epilepsy who are prescribed antidepressants, considering symptoms and functioning that may not improve simultaneously. (7) Caregiver education is essential to ensure treatment adherence. (8) A shared-care model involving all healthcare providers is recommended for children and adolescents with epilepsy and mental health disorders. We identified clinical decisions in the management of depression and anxiety that lack solid evidence and provide consensus-based guidance to address the care of children and adolescents with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3155-3185"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Excess health care use is significantly and persistently reduced following diagnosis of late-onset epilepsy 确诊晚发性癫痫后,过度使用医疗服务的情况会明显持续减少。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18105
Marta Berglund, Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Spiros Denaxas, B. Cord Lethebe, Tolulope T. Sajobi, Jordan D. T. Engbers, Samuel Wiebe, Colin B. Josephson

Objective

The incidence of late-onset epilepsy (LOE) is rising, and these patients may use an excess of health care resources. This study aimed to measure pre-/post-diagnostic health care use (HCU) for patients with LOE compared to controls.

Methods

This was an observational open cohort study covering years 1998–2019 using UK population-based linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD]) and hospital (HES) electronic health records. The participants included patients with incident LOE enrolled in CPRD and 1:10 age-, sex-, and general practice–matched controls. The exposure was incident LOE (diagnosed at age ≥65) using a 5-year washout. The main outcome was all HCU (primary care [PC], accident and emergency [A&E], admitted patient and outpatient care) using inverse proportional weighting to PC use and HCU by setting. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to examine pre-/post-diagnostic HCU between patients with LOE and controls over 4 years either side of diagnosis/matching date. An adjusted mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used for post-diagnosis HCU interactions.

Results

Of 2 569 874 people ≥65 years of age, 1048 (4%) developed incident LOE. Mean weighted total HCU increased by 32 visits per patient-year (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 13–50, p = .003) until LOE diagnosis, and then dropped by a mean of 60 visits per patient-year (95% CI: −81 to −40). There was an acute rise and fall over the 1–2 years immediately pre-/post-diagnosis. Incident HCU remained higher for LOE compared to controls post-diagnosis (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.65–1.70; p < .001), including A&E, outpatient, and admitted care.

Significance

Health care use demonstrates an acute on chronic rise over the 4 years before diagnosis of LOE. To what extent the partial reversal of the acute pre-diagnosis rise, and the mediators of the accelerated increase compared to controls are attributed to epilepsy, comorbid and bidirectional disease states, or a combination of both warrants further exploration.

目的:晚发性癫痫(LOE)的发病率正在上升,这些患者可能会使用过多的医疗资源。本研究旨在测量晚发性癫痫患者与对照组相比在诊断前后的医疗资源使用情况(HCU):这是一项开放式队列观察研究,研究时间跨度为1998年至2019年,使用的是英国基于人群的链接初级保健(临床实践研究数据链[CPRD])和医院(HES)电子健康记录。参与者包括在 CPRD 登记的事件性 LOE 患者和 1:10 的年龄、性别和全科匹配对照组。暴露为事件性LOE(诊断年龄≥65岁),采用5年冲洗法。主要结果是所有HCU(初级保健[PC]、事故和急诊[A&E]、住院病人和门诊病人护理),采用反比例加权法对PC使用和HCU进行设置。采用间断时间序列分析法对LOE患者和对照组在诊断/配对日期两侧4年内的诊断前/诊断后HCU进行检查。对诊断后HCU的交互作用采用了调整后的混合负二项回归:在2 569 874名年龄≥65岁的患者中,1048人(4%)发生了LOE。在确诊 LOE 之前,每名患者每年的平均加权总 HCU 增加了 32 次(95% 置信区间 [95%CI]:13-50,p = .003),之后每名患者每年平均减少了 60 次(95% CI:-81 至 -40)。在确诊前后的1-2年时间里,就诊率急剧上升和下降。与对照组相比,LOE 在诊断后的 HCU 发生率仍然较高(调整后的发生率比值:1.72;95% CI:1.65-1.70;P 意义重大:在LOE确诊前的4年中,医疗服务的使用呈现出由急性到慢性的上升趋势。与对照组相比,诊断前急性上升的部分逆转以及加速上升的介导因素在多大程度上归因于癫痫、合并和双向疾病状态或两者的结合,值得进一步探讨。
{"title":"Excess health care use is significantly and persistently reduced following diagnosis of late-onset epilepsy","authors":"Marta Berglund,&nbsp;Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo,&nbsp;Spiros Denaxas,&nbsp;B. Cord Lethebe,&nbsp;Tolulope T. Sajobi,&nbsp;Jordan D. T. Engbers,&nbsp;Samuel Wiebe,&nbsp;Colin B. Josephson","doi":"10.1111/epi.18105","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18105","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The incidence of late-onset epilepsy (LOE) is rising, and these patients may use an excess of health care resources. This study aimed to measure pre-/post-diagnostic health care use (HCU) for patients with LOE compared to controls.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This was an observational open cohort study covering years 1998–2019 using UK population-based linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD]) and hospital (HES) electronic health records. The participants included patients with incident LOE enrolled in CPRD and 1:10 age-, sex-, and general practice–matched controls. The exposure was incident LOE (diagnosed at age ≥65) using a 5-year washout. The main outcome was all HCU (primary care [PC], accident and emergency [A&amp;E], admitted patient and outpatient care) using inverse proportional weighting to PC use and HCU by setting. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to examine pre-/post-diagnostic HCU between patients with LOE and controls over 4 years either side of diagnosis/matching date. An adjusted mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used for post-diagnosis HCU interactions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 2 569 874 people ≥65 years of age, 1048 (4%) developed incident LOE. Mean weighted total HCU increased by 32 visits per patient-year (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 13–50, <i>p</i> = .003) until LOE diagnosis, and then dropped by a mean of 60 visits per patient-year (95% CI: −81 to −40). There was an acute rise and fall over the 1–2 years immediately pre-/post-diagnosis. Incident HCU remained higher for LOE compared to controls post-diagnosis (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.65–1.70; <i>p</i> &lt; .001), including A&amp;E, outpatient, and admitted care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Health care use demonstrates an acute on chronic rise over the 4 years before diagnosis of LOE. To what extent the partial reversal of the acute pre-diagnosis rise, and the mediators of the accelerated increase compared to controls are attributed to epilepsy, comorbid and bidirectional disease states, or a combination of both warrants further exploration.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3350-3361"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18105","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In vivo biomarkers of GABAergic function in epileptic rats treated with the GAT-1 inhibitor E2730 用 GAT-1 抑制剂 E2730 治疗癫痫大鼠体内 GABA 能功能的生物标记物。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18119
Idrish Ali, Bianca Jupp, Matthew R. Hudson, Brendan Major, Juliana Silva, Glenn R. Yamakawa, Pablo M. Casillas-Espinosa, Emma Braine, Peravina Thergarajan, Mohammad B. Haskali, Lucy Vivash, Robert Brkljaca, Sandy R. Shultz, Patrick Kwan, Kazuyuki Fukushima, Pallavi Sachdev, Jocelyn Y. Cheng, Richelle Mychasiuk, Nigel C. Jones, David K. Wright, Terence J. OBrien

Objective

E2730, an uncompetitive γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter-1 (GAT-1) inhibitor, has potent anti-seizure effects in a rodent model of chronic temporal lobe epilepsy, the kainic acid status epilepticus (KASE) rat model. In this study, we examined purported neuroimaging and physiological surrogate biomarkers of the effect of E2730 on brain GABAergic function.

Methods

We conducted a randomized cross-over study, incorporating 1-week treatments with E2730 (100 mg/kg/day subcutaneous infusion) or vehicle in epileptic post-KASE rats. KASE rats underwent serial 9.4 T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) measuring GABA and other brain metabolites, [18F]Flumazenil positron emission tomography (PET) quantifying GABAA receptor availability, quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–mediated motor activity, as well as continuous video-EEG recording to measure spontaneous seizures during each treatment. Age-matched, healthy control animals treated with E2730 or vehicle were also studied.

Results

E2730 treatment significantly reduced spontaneous seizures, with 8 of 11 animals becoming seizure-free. MRS revealed that E2730-treated animals had significantly reduced taurine levels. [18F]Flumazenil PET imaging revealed no changes in GABA receptor affinity or density during E2730 treatment. The power of gamma frequency oscillations in the EEG was decreased significantly in the auditory cortex and hippocampus of KASE and control rats during E2730 treatment. Auditory evoked gamma frequency power was enhanced by E2730 treatment in the auditory cortex of KASE and healthy controls, but only in the hippocampus of KASE rats. E2730 did not influence motor evoked potentials triggered by TMS.

Significance

This study identified clinically relevant changes in multimodality imaging and functional purported biomarkers of GABAergic activity during E2730 treatment in epileptic and healthy control animals. These biomarkers could be utilized in clinical trials of E2730 and potentially other GABAergic drugs to provide surrogate endpoints, thereby reducing the cost of such trials.

目的:E2730是一种非竞争性γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)转运体-1(GAT-1)抑制剂,在慢性颞叶癫痫啮齿动物模型--凯尼酸状态癫痫(KASE)大鼠模型中具有强效抗癫痫作用。在这项研究中,我们研究了E2730对大脑GABA能功能影响的所谓神经影像学和生理学替代生物标志物:我们进行了一项随机交叉研究,对癫痫后 KASE 大鼠进行为期 1 周的 E2730(100 毫克/千克/天,皮下注射)或药物治疗。在每次治疗期间,KASE大鼠接受了连续的9.4 T磁共振波谱(MRS)检查,以测量GABA和其他脑代谢物;接受了[18F]氟马西尼正电子发射断层扫描(PET)检查,以量化GABAA受体的可用性;接受了定量脑电图(qEEG)检查和经颅磁刺激(TMS)介导的运动活动检查,以及连续的视频脑电图记录,以测量自发性癫痫发作。同时还研究了接受E2730或药物治疗的年龄匹配的健康对照组动物:结果:E2730治疗可明显减少自发性癫痫发作,11只动物中有8只不再发作。MRS显示,E2730治疗动物的牛磺酸水平明显降低。[18F]氟马西尼 PET 成像显示,E2730 治疗期间 GABA 受体的亲和力或密度没有变化。在E2730治疗期间,KASE大鼠和对照组大鼠听觉皮层和海马的脑电图中伽马频率振荡的功率明显下降。E2730能增强KASE大鼠和健康对照组大鼠听觉皮层的听觉诱发伽马频率功率,但仅增强KASE大鼠海马的伽马频率功率。E2730不会影响TMS触发的运动诱发电位:本研究确定了癫痫和健康对照组动物在接受 E2730 治疗期间 GABA 能活动的多模态成像和功能性生物标志物的临床相关变化。这些生物标志物可用于E2730和其他GABA能药物的临床试验,以提供替代终点,从而降低此类试验的成本。
{"title":"In vivo biomarkers of GABAergic function in epileptic rats treated with the GAT-1 inhibitor E2730","authors":"Idrish Ali,&nbsp;Bianca Jupp,&nbsp;Matthew R. Hudson,&nbsp;Brendan Major,&nbsp;Juliana Silva,&nbsp;Glenn R. Yamakawa,&nbsp;Pablo M. Casillas-Espinosa,&nbsp;Emma Braine,&nbsp;Peravina Thergarajan,&nbsp;Mohammad B. Haskali,&nbsp;Lucy Vivash,&nbsp;Robert Brkljaca,&nbsp;Sandy R. Shultz,&nbsp;Patrick Kwan,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Fukushima,&nbsp;Pallavi Sachdev,&nbsp;Jocelyn Y. Cheng,&nbsp;Richelle Mychasiuk,&nbsp;Nigel C. Jones,&nbsp;David K. Wright,&nbsp;Terence J. OBrien","doi":"10.1111/epi.18119","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18119","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>E2730, an uncompetitive γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter-1 (GAT-1) inhibitor, has potent anti-seizure effects in a rodent model of chronic temporal lobe epilepsy, the kainic acid status epilepticus (KASE) rat model. In this study, we examined purported neuroimaging and physiological surrogate biomarkers of the effect of E2730 on brain GABAergic function.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a randomized cross-over study, incorporating 1-week treatments with E2730 (100 mg/kg/day subcutaneous infusion) or vehicle in epileptic post-KASE rats. KASE rats underwent serial 9.4 T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) measuring GABA and other brain metabolites, [<sup>18</sup>F]Flumazenil positron emission tomography (PET) quantifying GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor availability, quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–mediated motor activity, as well as continuous video-EEG recording to measure spontaneous seizures during each treatment. Age-matched, healthy control animals treated with E2730 or vehicle were also studied.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>E2730 treatment significantly reduced spontaneous seizures, with 8 of 11 animals becoming seizure-free. MRS revealed that E2730-treated animals had significantly reduced taurine levels. [<sup>18</sup>F]Flumazenil PET imaging revealed no changes in GABA receptor affinity or density during E2730 treatment. The power of gamma frequency oscillations in the EEG was decreased significantly in the auditory cortex and hippocampus of KASE and control rats during E2730 treatment. Auditory evoked gamma frequency power was enhanced by E2730 treatment in the auditory cortex of KASE and healthy controls, but only in the hippocampus of KASE rats. E2730 did not influence motor evoked potentials triggered by TMS.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study identified clinically relevant changes in multimodality imaging and functional purported biomarkers of GABAergic activity during E2730 treatment in epileptic and healthy control animals. These biomarkers could be utilized in clinical trials of E2730 and potentially other GABAergic drugs to provide surrogate endpoints, thereby reducing the cost of such trials.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3376-3390"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18119","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epilepsia – September 2024 announcements 癫痫病学》--2024 年 9 月公告
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18111
<p> <b>15th European Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>7–11 September 2024</p><p>Rome, Italy</p><p> <b>Cápsula Virtual Sobre Convulsiones Febriles Para América Latina - 2024</b> </p><p>9–15 September 2024</p><p>Online</p><p> <b>ASEPA EEG Part 1 Exam</b> </p><p>11 September 2024</p><p>Jakarta, Indonesia</p><p> <b>14th International Summer School for Neuropathology and Epilepsy Surgery</b> </p><p>19–22 September 2024</p><p>Erlangen, Germany</p><p> <b>ASEPA SEEG Workshop and DIXI SEEG Course</b> </p><p>30 October–3 November 2024</p><p>Bangkok, Thailand</p><p> <b>Advanced Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Course2024</b> </p><p>7–10 November 2024</p><p>Cochin, India</p><p> <b>7th East Mediterranean Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>14–16 November 2024</p><p>Manama, Bahrain</p><p> <b>2025</b> </p><p> <b>14th ILAE School on Pre-Surgical Evaluation for Epilepsy and Epilepsy Surgery</b> </p><p>20–24 January 2025</p><p>Brno, Czech Republic</p><p> <b>15th Asian & Oceanian Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>20–23 February 2025</p><p>New Delhi, India</p><p> <b>5th African Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>1–31 May 2025</p><p>Africa</p><p> <b>XVIII Workshop on Neurobiology of Epilepsy (WONOEP 2025)</b> </p><p>25–29 August 2025</p><p>Portugal</p><p> <b>36th International Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>30 August–3 September 2025</p><p>Lisbon, Portugal</p><p> <b>Implementing Epilepsy Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa</b> </p><p>3 September 2024</p><p> <b>ADHD in Children with Epilepsy: Screening, diagnosis and management</b> </p><p>20 September 2024</p><p> <b>ILAE e-Forum: Reducing Epilepsy Related Mortality</b> </p><p>23 September 2024</p><p> <b>Psychosocial Factors and Approaches to Care</b> </p><p>25 September 2024</p><p> <b>ILAE e-Forum: Optimal Timing For Epilepsy Surgery</b> </p><p>25 November 2024</p><p> <b>Localisation en EEG</b> </p><p>6 September 2024</p><p>Rabat, Maroc</p><p> <b>33rd International Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology</b>
第 15 届欧洲癫痫大会 2024 年 9 月 7-11 日意大利罗马 2024 年 9 月 9-15 日在线 ASEPA 脑电图第 1 部分考试 2024 年 9 月 11 日印度尼西亚雅加达 2024 年 9 月 19-22 日德国埃尔兰根 第 14 届国际神经病理学和癫痫外科暑期学校 2024 年 10 月 30 日至 11 月 3 日泰国曼谷 2024 年 10 月 30 日至 11 月 3 日德国埃尔兰根 ASEPA SEEG 讲习班和 DIXI SEEG 课程 2024 年 10 月 30 日至 11 月 3 日泰国曼谷 2024 年 10 月 30 日至 11 月 3 日印度科钦 2024 年 11 月 7-10 日第 7 届东地中海癫痫大会 2024 年 11 月 14-16 日巴林麦纳麦 2025 年 11 月 14 日第 14 届 ILAE 学院2024 年 11 月 7-10 日 印度科钦 2024 年 11 月 14-16 日 巴林麦纳麦 2025 年 1 月 20-24 日 捷克共和国布尔诺 2025 年 1 月 20-24 日 第 15 届亚洲及大洋洲癫痫大会 20-23 日 泰国曼谷2025 年 2 月 20-23 日印度新德里 2025 年 5 月 1-31 日第 5 届非洲癫痫大会 2025 年 8 月 25-29 日第 18 届非洲癫痫神经生物学研讨会 (WONOEP 2025) 2025 年 8 月 30 日至 9 月 3 日葡萄牙里斯本 2025 年 9 月 3 日葡萄牙第 36 届国际癫痫大会 2025 年 8 月 30 日至 9 月 3 日在撒哈拉以南非洲实施癫痫手术 2024 年 9 月 3 日癫痫儿童多动症:2024 年 9 月 20 日 ILAE 电子论坛:减少癫痫相关死亡率 2024 年 9 月 23 日 社会心理因素和护理方法 2024 年 9 月 25 日 ILAE 电子论坛:2024 年 9 月 6 日摩洛哥拉巴特 2024 年 9 月 10-14 日印度尼西亚雅加达 第 33 届国际临床神经生理学大会 2024 年 9 月 10-14 日美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰诊所国际癫痫峰会 2024 年 9 月 11-15 日美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰第 10 届埃拉特国际教育课程:2024 年 9 月 15-20 日塞浦路斯利马索尔 2024 年 9 月 17-20 日德国美因河畔法兰克福 2024 年 9 月 20-21 日突尼斯斯法克斯世界神经病学联合会数字神经病学更新 2024 年 9 月 26-27 日在线第 6 期博洛尼亚 epiped-eeg 课程:2024 年 9 月 29 日至 10 月 3 日意大利博洛尼亚 2024 年 10 月 8 日至 11 日法国马赛 2024 年 10 月 10 日至 11 日印度尼西亚绵阳 2024 年 10 月 11 日至 12 日突尼斯斯法克斯 2024 年 10 月 16 日埃及开罗 2024 年 10 月 18 日至 20 日杜阿拉 2024 年 10 月 18 日至 20 日开罗癫痫研讨会2024 年 10 月 21-23 日英国利物浦 SEEG 课程 2024 年 10 月 31 日-11 月 2 日泰国第二届加拿大儿科 SEEG 年会 2024 年 11 月 1-3 日加拿大安大略省伦敦 2024 年 11 月 6-8 日澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州霍巴特 2024 年 11 月 6-8 日澳大利亚癫痫协会科学年会 2024 年 11 月 6-8 日澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州霍巴特 2024 年 10 月 31 日-11 月 2 日泰国第二届加拿大儿科 SEEG 年会 2024 年 10 月 1-3 日加拿大安大略省伦敦 2024 年 11 月 6-8 日澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州霍巴特 2024 年 11 月 6-8 日第二届耐药性癫痫 (DRE) 药物治疗高级课程:2024 年 11 月 8-10 日西班牙马略卡岛帕尔马 2024 年 11 月 9 日英国伯明翰 2024 年 12 月 2-3 日英国伦敦脑炎 2024 年 12 月 2-3 日英国伯明翰 2024 年 11 月 9 日英国伯明翰 2024 年 12 月 2-3 日英国伦敦脑炎 2024 年 11 月 9 日英国伯明翰 2024 年 12 月 2-3 日英国伦敦脑炎 2024 年 12 月 2-3 日英国伦敦脑炎 2024 年 12 月 2-3 日英国伦敦脑炎 &amp; 在线
{"title":"Epilepsia – September 2024 announcements","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/epi.18111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18111","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;15th European Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7–11 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rome, Italy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Cápsula Virtual Sobre Convulsiones Febriles Para América Latina - 2024&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9–15 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Online&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;ASEPA EEG Part 1 Exam&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jakarta, Indonesia&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;14th International Summer School for Neuropathology and Epilepsy Surgery&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19–22 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Erlangen, Germany&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;ASEPA SEEG Workshop and DIXI SEEG Course&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;30 October–3 November 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bangkok, Thailand&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Advanced Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Course2024&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7–10 November 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cochin, India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;7th East Mediterranean Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14–16 November 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Manama, Bahrain&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 &lt;b&gt;2025&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;14th ILAE School on Pre-Surgical Evaluation for Epilepsy and Epilepsy Surgery&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20–24 January 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brno, Czech Republic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;15th Asian &amp; Oceanian Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20–23 February 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New Delhi, India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;5th African Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1–31 May 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Africa&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;XVIII Workshop on Neurobiology of Epilepsy (WONOEP 2025)&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25–29 August 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Portugal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;36th International Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;30 August–3 September 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lisbon, Portugal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Implementing Epilepsy Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;ADHD in Children with Epilepsy: Screening, diagnosis and management&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;ILAE e-Forum: Reducing Epilepsy Related Mortality&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Psychosocial Factors and Approaches to Care&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;ILAE e-Forum: Optimal Timing For Epilepsy Surgery&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25 November 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Localisation en EEG&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6 September 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rabat, Maroc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;33rd International Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 9","pages":"2827-2829"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18111","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142273121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SzCORE: Seizure Community Open‐Source Research Evaluation framework for the validation of electroencephalography‐based automated seizure detection algorithms SzCORE:癫痫发作社区开源研究评估框架,用于验证基于脑电图的癫痫发作自动检测算法
IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18113
Jonathan Dan, Una Pale, Alireza Amirshahi, William Cappelletti, Thorir Mar Ingolfsson, Xiaying Wang, Andrea Cossettini, Adriano Bernini, Luca Benini, Sándor Beniczky, David Atienza, Philippe Ryvlin
The need for high‐quality automated seizure detection algorithms based on electroencephalography (EEG) becomes ever more pressing with the increasing use of ambulatory and long‐term EEG monitoring. Heterogeneity in validation methods of these algorithms influences the reported results and makes comprehensive evaluation and comparison challenging. This heterogeneity concerns in particular the choice of datasets, evaluation methodologies, and performance metrics. In this paper, we propose a unified framework designed to establish standardization in the validation of EEG‐based seizure detection algorithms. Based on existing guidelines and recommendations, the framework introduces a set of recommendations and standards related to datasets, file formats, EEG data input content, seizure annotation input and output, cross‐validation strategies, and performance metrics. We also propose the EEG 10–20 seizure detection benchmark, a machine‐learning benchmark based on public datasets converted to a standardized format. This benchmark defines the machine‐learning task as well as reporting metrics. We illustrate the use of the benchmark by evaluating a set of existing seizure detection algorithms. The SzCORE (Seizure Community Open‐Source Research Evaluation) framework and benchmark are made publicly available along with an open‐source software library to facilitate research use, while enabling rigorous evaluation of the clinical significance of the algorithms, fostering a collective effort to more optimally detect seizures to improve the lives of people with epilepsy.
随着非卧床和长期脑电图(EEG)监测应用的不断增加,对基于脑电图(EEG)的高质量癫痫发作自动检测算法的需求日益迫切。这些算法验证方法的不一致性影响了报告结果,并使全面评估和比较具有挑战性。这种异质性尤其涉及数据集、评估方法和性能指标的选择。在本文中,我们提出了一个统一的框架,旨在建立基于脑电图的癫痫发作检测算法验证的标准化。在现有指南和建议的基础上,该框架引入了一套与数据集、文件格式、脑电图数据输入内容、癫痫发作注释输入和输出、交叉验证策略和性能指标相关的建议和标准。我们还提出了 EEG 10-20 癫痫发作检测基准,这是一个基于转换为标准化格式的公共数据集的机器学习基准。该基准定义了机器学习任务以及报告指标。我们通过评估一组现有的癫痫发作检测算法来说明基准的使用。SzCORE(癫痫发作社区开源研究评估)框架和基准与一个开源软件库一起公开发布,以方便研究使用,同时对算法的临床意义进行严格评估,促进集体努力,以更优化的方式检测癫痫发作,改善癫痫患者的生活。
{"title":"SzCORE: Seizure Community Open‐Source Research Evaluation framework for the validation of electroencephalography‐based automated seizure detection algorithms","authors":"Jonathan Dan, Una Pale, Alireza Amirshahi, William Cappelletti, Thorir Mar Ingolfsson, Xiaying Wang, Andrea Cossettini, Adriano Bernini, Luca Benini, Sándor Beniczky, David Atienza, Philippe Ryvlin","doi":"10.1111/epi.18113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18113","url":null,"abstract":"The need for high‐quality automated seizure detection algorithms based on electroencephalography (EEG) becomes ever more pressing with the increasing use of ambulatory and long‐term EEG monitoring. Heterogeneity in validation methods of these algorithms influences the reported results and makes comprehensive evaluation and comparison challenging. This heterogeneity concerns in particular the choice of datasets, evaluation methodologies, and performance metrics. In this paper, we propose a unified framework designed to establish standardization in the validation of EEG‐based seizure detection algorithms. Based on existing guidelines and recommendations, the framework introduces a set of recommendations and standards related to datasets, file formats, EEG data input content, seizure annotation input and output, cross‐validation strategies, and performance metrics. We also propose the EEG 10–20 seizure detection benchmark, a machine‐learning benchmark based on public datasets converted to a standardized format. This benchmark defines the machine‐learning task as well as reporting metrics. We illustrate the use of the benchmark by evaluating a set of existing seizure detection algorithms. The SzCORE (Seizure Community Open‐Source Research Evaluation) framework and benchmark are made publicly available along with an open‐source software library to facilitate research use, while enabling rigorous evaluation of the clinical significance of the algorithms, fostering a collective effort to more optimally detect seizures to improve the lives of people with epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142265904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patients carrying pathogenic SCN8A variants with loss- and gain-of-function effects can be classified into five subgroups exhibiting varying developmental and epileptic components of encephalopathy 携带具有功能缺失和功能增益效应的致病性 SCN8A 变体的患者可分为五个亚组,表现出不同的脑病发育和癫痫成分
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18118
Joshua B. Hack, Joseph C. Watkins, John M. Schreiber, Michael F. Hammer

Objective

Phenotypic heterogeneity presents challenges in providing clinical care to patients with pathogenic SCN8A variants, which underly a wide disease spectrum ranging from neurodevelopmental delays without seizures to a continuum of mild to severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). An important unanswered question is whether there are clinically important subgroups within this wide spectrum. Using both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) approaches, we previously found statistical support for two and three subgroups associated with loss- and gain- of- function vari-ants, respectively. Here, we test the hypothesis that the unsupervised subgroups (U1–U3) are distinguished by differential contributions of developmental and epileptic components.

Methods

We predicted that patients in the U1 and U2 subgroups would differ in timing of developmental delay and seizure onset, with earlier and concurrent onset of both features for the U3 subgroup. Standard statistical procedures were used to test these predictions, as well as to investigate clinically relevant associations among all five subgroups.

Results

Two-population proportion and Kruskal–Wallis tests supported the hypothesis of a reversed order of developmental delay and seizure onset for patients in U1 and U2, and nearly synchronous developmental delay/seizure onset for the U3 (termed DEE) subgroup. Association testing identified subgroup variation in treatment response, frequency of initial seizure type, and comorbidities, as well as different median ages of developmental delay onset for all five subgroups.

Significance

Unsupervised ML approaches discern differential developmental and epileptic components among patients with SCN8A-related epilepsy. Patients in U1 (termed developmental encephalopathy) typically gain seizure control yet rarely experience improvements in development, whereas those in U2 (termed epileptic encephalopathy) have fewer if any developmental impairments despite difficulty in achieving seizure control. This understanding improves prognosis and clinical management and provides a framework to discover mechanisms underlying variability in clinical outcome of patients with SCN8A-related disorders.

目的表型异质性给致病性 SCN8A 变体患者的临床治疗带来了挑战,这些变体导致了广泛的疾病谱,从无癫痫发作的神经发育迟缓到从轻度到重度的发育性和癫痫性脑病(DEEs)。一个尚未解答的重要问题是,在这一广泛的疾病谱中是否存在临床上重要的亚群。利用监督和无监督机器学习(ML)方法,我们之前发现分别有两个和三个亚组与功能损失和功能增益变异相关。我们预测 U1 和 U2 亚组的患者在发育迟缓和癫痫发作的时间上会有所不同,而 U3 亚组的这两个特征会更早且同时出现。结果两组人口比例检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验支持以下假设:U1 和 U2 组患者的发育迟缓和癫痫发作顺序相反,而 U3(称为 DEE)亚组患者的发育迟缓/癫痫发作几乎同步。关联测试确定了治疗反应、初始发作类型频率和合并症方面的亚组差异,以及所有五个亚组发育迟缓发病年龄的中位数差异。U1(称为发育性脑病)患者通常能控制癫痫发作,但发育很少得到改善,而U2(称为癫痫性脑病)患者尽管难以控制癫痫发作,但发育障碍较少。这种认识有助于改善预后和临床管理,并为发现 SCN8A 相关疾病患者临床结局差异的内在机制提供了一个框架。
{"title":"Patients carrying pathogenic SCN8A variants with loss- and gain-of-function effects can be classified into five subgroups exhibiting varying developmental and epileptic components of encephalopathy","authors":"Joshua B. Hack,&nbsp;Joseph C. Watkins,&nbsp;John M. Schreiber,&nbsp;Michael F. Hammer","doi":"10.1111/epi.18118","DOIUrl":"10.1111/epi.18118","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Phenotypic heterogeneity presents challenges in providing clinical care to patients with pathogenic <i>SCN8A</i> variants, which underly a wide disease spectrum ranging from neurodevelopmental delays without seizures to a continuum of mild to severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). An important unanswered question is whether there are clinically important subgroups within this wide spectrum. Using both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) approaches, we previously found statistical support for two and three subgroups associated with loss- and gain- of- function vari-ants, respectively. Here, we test the hypothesis that the unsupervised subgroups (U1–U3) are distinguished by differential contributions of developmental and epileptic components.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We predicted that patients in the U1 and U2 subgroups would differ in timing of developmental delay and seizure onset, with earlier and concurrent onset of both features for the U3 subgroup. Standard statistical procedures were used to test these predictions, as well as to investigate clinically relevant associations among all five subgroups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two-population proportion and Kruskal–Wallis tests supported the hypothesis of a reversed order of developmental delay and seizure onset for patients in U1 and U2, and nearly synchronous developmental delay/seizure onset for the U3 (termed DEE) subgroup. Association testing identified subgroup variation in treatment response, frequency of initial seizure type, and comorbidities, as well as different median ages of developmental delay onset for all five subgroups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Unsupervised ML approaches discern differential developmental and epileptic components among patients with SCN8A-related epilepsy. Patients in U1 (termed developmental encephalopathy) typically gain seizure control yet rarely experience improvements in development, whereas those in U2 (termed epileptic encephalopathy) have fewer if any developmental impairments despite difficulty in achieving seizure control. This understanding improves prognosis and clinical management and provides a framework to discover mechanisms underlying variability in clinical outcome of patients with SCN8A-related disorders.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3324-3334"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142265906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Epilepsia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1