It is seen that religious coping methods are used in the literature, but the existing literature on religious coping methods and coping strategies used by epilepsy patients is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the positive and negative religious coping levels of epilepsy patients.
This research is a descriptive research type. The research data were collected from patients with epilepsy living in a province in eastern Turkey between April and June 2024. The research population consists of epilepsy patients living in Erzurum province. The sample consisted of 154 patients who agreed to participate in the study. Data collection tools were “Questionnaire Form” and “Religious Coping Scale.” Frequency, percentage calculations, mean and standard deviation values were used to evaluate the data. One Way Anova, Independent Sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U, and Pearson correlation tests were also used.
Positive religious coping scores (22.90 ± 5.35) and Negative religious coping scores (7.24 ± 3.25) of epilepsy patients were found to be at high levels. Participants’ gender, marital status, occupation, income status, prayer, fasting, and Quran reading habits significantly affected their positive religious coping behaviors (p < 0.05). In addition, it was determined that as the age of the participants increased, they resorted to positive religious coping behaviors more (r: 0.215, p < 0.05).
The results of the study show that the positive and negative religious coping levels of epilepsy patients are high. In addition, the participants prefer positive religious coping behaviors more.
To systematically assess the risk factors for secondary epilepsy in children with febrile seizures, in order to promptly identify early signs of epilepsy and establish a reliable foundation for timely clinical intervention and improved prognosis.
The databases, including CNKI, WanFang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies, up to October 2023. Two researchers independently collected and extracted data from selected studies, adhering to predefined criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15.0.
A total of 23 studies included 714 cases in the case group and 5269 cases in the control group. The results of Meta-analysis showed that preterm birth (OR=3.30, P=0.02), history of perinatal asphyxia (OR=3.94, P=0.001), age at the first seizure < 12 months (OR=2.93, P=0.003), peak temperature < 39℃ (OR=2.51, P<0.001), onset of fever to seizure < 1 h (OR=5.61, P<0.001), Complex FS(OR=4.08, P<0.001), duration of the seizure > 15 min (OR=6.21, P<0.001), Multiple seizures (≥2/episode) in one attack (OR=2.92, P<0.001), focal seizures (OR=2.53, P=0.018), recurrent FS (≥2) (OR=3.49, P<0.001), neurodevelopmental abnormality(OR=8.68, P<0.001), developmental delay(OR=10.04, P<0.001), family history of epilepsy (OR=2.74, P=0.004), family history of FS (OR=2.07, P=0.022), electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormal(OR=4.06, P<0.001)and Brain imaging abnormalities (OR=2.84, P=0.002)were Risk factors for secondary epilepsy following FS in Children. Notably, gender (female) was not a significant factor.
This study provides a comprehensive and systematic discussion of the risk factors associated with secondary epilepsy in children with febrile seizures. It actively formulates intervention measures for modifiable risk factors and conducts early detection and continuous follow-up observation for non-modifiable high-risk children, thereby reducing the risk of epilepsy.
Epilepsy fundamentally involves a struggle with “control,” commonly framed in terms of reducing the frequency and severity of seizures. This paper seeks to understand how people with epilepsy (PWE) think about and define control, as well as the psychosocial outcomes of self-managing epilepsy and low perceived control.
Here, we employ a qualitative analysis of interviews with 64 adults with epilepsy in treatment in a tertiary referral center in New York City, conducted between July 2020 and July 2022 as part of a larger study of the lived experiences of PWE. The interviews were coded, and thematic analysis was used to identify participants’ constructions of control and the breadth of illness intrusiveness they experienced.
Findings indicate that applying the illness intrusiveness concept to epilepsy aligns with existing research, revealing that PWE are impacted in numerous ways beyond seizure frequency and severity. Participants reported significant anxiety related to the unpredictability of seizures and the potential embarrassment of having seizures in public. These insights highlight that illness self-management and social challenges are critical components of the experience of having epilepsy.
Our findings underscore the need for a wholistic approach to improving quality of life for PWE that recognizes the broader context of illness intrusiveness. By understanding and enhancing perceived control, future interventions can better support the mental health and overall well-being of PWE.