Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of iodine density map (IDM) using dual-energy CT (DECT) in differentiating colorectal cancer from benign colorectal wall thickening.
Material and Methods
This IRB-approved dual-center retrospective exploratory study included 71 consecutive patients with colorectal wall thickening due to tumoral or non-tumoral origin, confirmed by colonoscopy and assessed with DECT. Thirty-eight had pathology-proven colorectal adenocarcinoma, and 33 had non-neoplastic thickening (inflammation, physiologic collapse, or post-radiotherapy change). Iodine density values were measured from regions of interest on three consecutive CT slices on portal venous phase, normalized to aortic iodine concentration. Diagnostic performance was determined by ROC analysis, and inter-reader agreement was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement (LOA).
Results
Mean IDM value was significantly higher in tumors than in benign thickening (2.31 ± 0.42 vs 1.43 ± 0.24 mg/mL; p < 0.001). Mean normalized iodine density map (NIDM) value was likewise elevated in tumors (0.46 ± 0.10 vs 0.31 ± 0.07; p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent performance for both IDM (AUC 0.98; optimal cutoff 1.72 mg/mL; sensitivity 92.1%, specificity 90.9%, NPV 90.9%) and NIDM (AUC 0.88; cutoff 0.35; sensitivity 92.1%, specificity 69.7%, NPV 88.7%). There was no significant difference between the inflammatory and collapsed-wall subgroups. Inter-reader agreement was excellent (ICC: 0.93 for IDM; 0.92 for NIDM).
Conclusion
IDM and NIDM on DECT provide robust, reproducible markers that differentiate colorectal carcinoma from benign wall thickening with high diagnostic accuracy. These quantitative parameters may improve diagnostic confidence and reduce unnecessary colonoscopies, supporting their integration into colorectal cancer evaluation.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
