首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
Corrigendum to “Prospective study of dual-phase 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT nomogram for differentiating non-small cell lung cancer from benign pulmonary lesions” [Eur. J. Radiol. 179 (2024) 111657] 用于区分非小细胞肺癌和肺部良性病变的双相 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT 直方图前瞻性研究"[《欧洲放射学杂志》(Eur. J. Radiol.) 179 (2024) 111657] 更正。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111704
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Prospective study of dual-phase 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT nomogram for differentiating non-small cell lung cancer from benign pulmonary lesions” [Eur. J. Radiol. 179 (2024) 111657]","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111704","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111704","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004200/pdfft?md5=aefc464d7daad20673240c6ead80e2b2&pid=1-s2.0-S0720048X24004200-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantification of bone microarchitecture using photon-counting CT at different radiation doses: A comparison with µCT 在不同辐射剂量下使用光子计数 CT 对骨微观结构进行量化:与 µCT 的比较。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111717

Purpose

Accurate measurements of trabecular bone microarchitecture are required for a proper assessment of bone fragility. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) has different technical properties than conventional CT, resulting in higher resolution and thereby potentially enabling in-vivo measurement of trabecular microarchitecture. The purpose of this study was to quantify trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters with PCD-CT at varying radiation doses and compare this to µCT as gold standard.

Method

Both distal radii, distal tibiae, femoral heads, and two vertebrae were dissected from one human. All specimens were scanned ex-vivo on a PCD-CT system (slice increment 0.1 mm; pixel size 0.1042–0.127 mm) and a µCT system (isotropic voxel size 49–68.4 µm). The radiation doses of the PCD-CT scans were varied from 2.5 to 120 mGy based on the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol32). For the PCD-CT scans, contrast-to-noise ratio and trabecular sharpness were calculated and compared between radiation doses. µCT and PCD-CT scans were registered. The trabecular bone was then segmented from all PCD-CT and µCT scans and split into cubes with 6-mm edge length. For each cube, bone volume over total volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, and trabecular heterogeneity were calculated and compared between corresponding PCD-CT and µCT cubes.

Results

With increasing dose, contrast-to-noise ratio and trabecular sharpness values increased for the PCD-CT images. Already at the lowest dose, high correlations between the trabecular microarchitectural parameters between µCT and PCD-CT were found (R2 = 0.55–0.95), which improved with increasing radiation dose (R2 = 0.76–0.96 at 20 mGy).

Conclusions

PCD-CT can be used to quantify trabecular bone microarchitecture, with accuracy comparable to µCT and at clinically relevant radiation doses.

目的:要对骨脆性进行正确评估,就必须对骨小梁微结构进行精确测量。光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)具有不同于传统 CT 的技术特性,因此分辨率更高,从而有可能实现对骨小梁微结构的体内测量。本研究的目的是利用 PCD-CT 在不同辐射剂量下量化骨小梁微结构参数,并将其与作为金标准的 µCT 进行比较:方法:从一个人身上解剖出两个桡骨远端、胫骨远端、股骨头和两个椎骨。所有标本均在 PCD-CT 系统(切片增量为 0.1 毫米;像素大小为 0.1042-0.127 毫米)和 µCT 系统(各向同性体素大小为 49-68.4 微米)上进行体外扫描。根据容积 CT 剂量指数(CTDIvol32),PCD-CT 扫描的辐射剂量从 2.5 到 120 mGy 不等。对于 PCD-CT 扫描,我们计算了对比度-噪声比和小梁锐利度,并对不同辐射剂量进行了比较。对 µCT 和 PCD-CT 扫描进行登记。然后从所有 PCD-CT 和 µCT 扫描中分割出骨小梁,并将其分成边长为 6 毫米的立方体。计算每个立方体的骨量占总体积的比例、骨小梁厚度、骨小梁数量和骨小梁异质性,并在相应的 PCD-CT 和 µCT 立方体之间进行比较:随着剂量的增加,PCD-CT图像的对比度-噪声比和小梁清晰度值也在增加。在最低剂量时,µCT 和 PCD-CT 之间的小梁微结构参数就已具有很高的相关性(R2 = 0.55-0.95),随着辐射剂量的增加,相关性有所提高(20 mGy 时 R2 = 0.76-0.96):结论:PCD-CT可用于量化骨小梁微结构,其准确性与µCT相当,且辐射剂量与临床相关。
{"title":"Quantification of bone microarchitecture using photon-counting CT at different radiation doses: A comparison with µCT","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111717","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111717","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Accurate measurements of trabecular bone microarchitecture are required for a proper assessment of bone fragility. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) has different technical properties than conventional CT, resulting in higher resolution and thereby potentially enabling <em>in-vivo</em> measurement of trabecular microarchitecture. The purpose of this study was to quantify trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters with PCD-CT at varying radiation doses and compare this to µCT as gold standard.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Both distal radii, distal tibiae, femoral heads, and two vertebrae were dissected from one human. All specimens were scanned <em>ex-vivo</em> on a PCD-CT system (slice increment 0.1 mm; pixel size 0.1042–0.127 mm) and a µCT system (isotropic voxel size 49–68.4 µm). The radiation doses of the PCD-CT scans were varied from 2.5 to 120 mGy based on the volume CT dose index (CTDI<sub>vol32</sub>). For the PCD-CT scans, contrast-to-noise ratio and trabecular sharpness were calculated and compared between radiation doses. µCT and PCD-CT scans were registered. The trabecular bone was then segmented from all PCD-CT and µCT scans and split into cubes with 6-mm edge length. For each cube, bone volume over total volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, and trabecular heterogeneity were calculated and compared between corresponding PCD-CT and µCT cubes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With increasing dose, contrast-to-noise ratio and trabecular sharpness values increased for the PCD-CT images. Already at the lowest dose, high correlations between the trabecular microarchitectural parameters between µCT and PCD-CT were found (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55–0.95), which improved with increasing radiation dose (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76–0.96 at 20 mGy).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PCD-CT can be used to quantify trabecular bone microarchitecture, with accuracy comparable to µCT and at clinically relevant radiation doses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004339/pdfft?md5=707c0b792b17a6ee84bf01abcc85f796&pid=1-s2.0-S0720048X24004339-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic implication of extra-pancreatic organ invasion in resectable pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreas tail 胰腺尾部可切除胰腺导管腺癌胰腺外器官侵犯的预后影响
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111715

Objectives

To assess the prognostic significance of extra-pancreatic organ invasion in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreas tail.

Materials & Methods

This retrospective study included patients with resectable PDAC in the pancreas tail who received upfront surgery between 2014 and 2020 at a tertiary institution. Preoperative pancreas protocol computed tomography (CT) scans evaluated tumor size, peripancreatic tumor infiltration, suspicious metastatic lymph nodes, and extra-pancreatic organ invasion. The influence of extra-pancreatic organ invasion, detected by CT or postoperative pathology, on pathologic resection margin status was evaluated using logistic regression. The impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models (clinical-CT and clinical-pathologic).

Results

The study included 158 patients (mean age, 65 years ± 8.8 standard deviation; 93 men). Extra-pancreatic organ invasion identified by either CT (p = 0.92) or pathology (p = 0.99) was not associated with a positive resection margin. Neither CT (p = 0.42) nor pathological (p = 0.64) extra-pancreatic organ invasion independently correlated with RFS. Independent predictors for RFS included suspicious metastatic lymph node (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.08–3.9; p = 0.03) on CT in the clinical-CT model, pathological T stage (HR, 2.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.39–6.35; p = 0.005 for T2 and HR, 3.78; 95 % CI, 1.64–8.76; p = 0.002 for T3) and adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.42–0.92; p = 0.02) in the clinical-pathologic model.

Conclusion

Extra-pancreatic organ invasion does not independently influence pathologic resection margin status and RFS in patients with resectable PDAC in the pancreas tail after curative-intent resection; therefore, it should not be considered a high-risk factor.

目的评估胰腺尾部可切除胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者胰腺外器官侵犯的预后意义:这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年至2020年间在一家三级医院接受前期手术的胰腺尾部可切除PDAC患者。术前胰腺方案计算机断层扫描(CT)评估了肿瘤大小、胰周肿瘤浸润、可疑转移淋巴结和胰外器官侵犯。利用逻辑回归评估了 CT 或术后病理检测到的胰腺外器官侵犯对病理切除边缘状态的影响。使用多变量 Cox 比例危险模型(临床-CT 和临床-病理)分析了对无复发生存率(RFS)的影响:研究共纳入 158 名患者(平均年龄 65 岁 ± 8.8 标准差;93 名男性)。CT(p = 0.92)或病理(p = 0.99)发现的胰腺外器官侵犯与切除边缘阳性无关。CT(p = 0.42)或病理(p = 0.64)发现的胰腺外器官侵犯均与RFS无关。RFS的独立预测因素包括临床-CT模型中CT显示的可疑转移淋巴结(危险比[HR],2.05;95%置信区间[CI],1.08-3.9;p = 0.03)、病理T分期(HR,2.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.39-6.35; p = 0.005 for T2 and HR, 3.78; 95 % CI, 1.64-8.76; p = 0.002 for T3)和辅助治疗(HR, 0.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.92; p = 0.02):胰腺外器官侵犯不会独立影响胰腺尾部可切除PDAC患者治愈性切除术后的病理切缘状态和RFS,因此不应将其视为高危因素。
{"title":"Prognostic implication of extra-pancreatic organ invasion in resectable pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreas tail","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111715","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111715","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the prognostic significance of extra-pancreatic organ invasion in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreas tail.</p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with resectable PDAC in the pancreas tail who received upfront surgery between 2014 and 2020 at a tertiary institution. Preoperative pancreas protocol computed tomography (CT) scans evaluated tumor size, peripancreatic tumor infiltration, suspicious metastatic lymph nodes, and extra-pancreatic organ invasion. The influence of extra-pancreatic organ invasion, detected by CT or postoperative pathology, on pathologic resection margin status was evaluated using logistic regression. The impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models (clinical-CT and clinical-pathologic).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 158 patients (mean age, 65 years ± 8.8 standard deviation; 93 men). Extra-pancreatic organ invasion identified by either CT (<em>p</em> = 0.92) or pathology (<em>p</em> = 0.99) was not associated with a positive resection margin. Neither CT (<em>p</em> = 0.42) nor pathological (<em>p</em> = 0.64) extra-pancreatic organ invasion independently correlated with RFS. Independent predictors for RFS included suspicious metastatic lymph node (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.08–3.9; <em>p</em> = 0.03) on CT in the clinical-CT model, pathological T stage (HR, 2.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.39–6.35; <em>p</em> = 0.005 for T2 and HR, 3.78; 95 % CI, 1.64–8.76; <em>p</em> = 0.002 for T3) and adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.42–0.92; <em>p</em> = 0.02) in the clinical-pathologic model.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Extra-pancreatic organ invasion does not independently influence pathologic resection margin status and RFS in patients with resectable PDAC in the pancreas tail after curative-intent resection; therefore, it should not be considered a high-risk factor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of the contribution of the ADC value to the Kaiser score in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions with non-mass enhancement morphology on MRI 评估 ADC 值对 Kaiser 评分在磁共振成像非肿块增强形态乳腺病变鉴别诊断中的贡献。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111713

Purpose

To investigate the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a supplementary tool to the Kaiser score (KS) in diagnosing breast cancer in non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions using breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 360 cases with NME on MRI images. Two breast radiologists independently evaluated each lesion using the Kaiser score (KS) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, without knowledge of the pathological outcomes. NME lesions with a KS above 4 and an ADC value below 1.3 × 10-3mm2/s were classified as malignant. Inter-rater reliability was determined using Cohen’s Kappa (κ) statistics. The diagnostic performance of KS, DWI, and their combination was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), and the results were compared across the benign and malignant groups.

Results

The diagnostic performance of KS surpassed that of DWI in predicting the malignancy of NMEs (p = 0.003). The sensitivity of KS alone was 93 %; however, when ADC data was incorporated, the sensitivity decreased to 86 %, with no significant difference observed (p = 0.060). The specificity of the combined KS and ADC (94 %) was significantly higher than that of KS alone (89 %) and DWI alone (73 %) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that although the combination of KS and ADC increased specificity and reduced unnecessary biopsies, the resulting decrease in sensitivity was unacceptable. Therefore, KS alone is superior to the KS-ADC combination in detecting malignancy in NME lesions.

目的:研究弥散加权成像(DWI)作为凯撒评分(KS)的辅助工具,在使用乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)诊断非肿块增强(NME)病变中的乳腺癌的有效性:这项单中心回顾性研究分析了 360 例核磁共振成像上的 NME 病例。两名乳腺放射科医生使用凯撒评分(KS)和表观弥散系数(ADC)值独立评估每个病灶,不了解病理结果。KS 值高于 4 且 ADC 值低于 1.3 × 10-3mm2/s 的 NME 病变被归类为恶性。使用 Cohen's Kappa (κ) 统计法确定评分者之间的可靠性。通过计算灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)评估了 KS、DWI 及其组合的诊断性能,并对良性组和恶性组的结果进行了比较:结果:在预测 NMEs 的恶性方面,KS 的诊断性能超过了 DWI(p = 0.003)。单用 KS 的灵敏度为 93%;但加入 ADC 数据后,灵敏度降至 86%,且无明显差异(p = 0.060)。联合使用 KS 和 ADC 的特异性(94%)明显高于单独使用 KS 的特异性(89%)和单独使用 DWI 的特异性(73%):我们的研究结果表明,虽然联合使用 KS 和 ADC 提高了特异性并减少了不必要的活检,但由此导致的敏感性下降是不可接受的。因此,在检测 NME 病变的恶性程度方面,单独使用 KS 优于 KS-ADC 组合。
{"title":"Assessment of the contribution of the ADC value to the Kaiser score in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions with non-mass enhancement morphology on MRI","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111713","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111713","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a supplementary tool to the Kaiser score (KS) in diagnosing breast cancer in non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions using breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 360 cases with NME on MRI images. Two breast radiologists independently evaluated each lesion using the Kaiser score (KS) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, without knowledge of the pathological outcomes. NME lesions with a KS above 4 and an ADC value below 1.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>/s were classified as malignant. Inter-rater reliability was determined using Cohen’s Kappa (κ) statistics. The diagnostic performance of KS, DWI, and their combination was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), and the results were compared across the benign and malignant groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The diagnostic performance of KS surpassed that of DWI in predicting the malignancy of NMEs (p = 0.003). The sensitivity of KS alone was 93 %; however, when ADC data was incorporated, the sensitivity decreased to 86 %, with no significant difference observed (p = 0.060). The specificity of the combined KS and ADC (94 %) was significantly higher than that of KS alone (89 %) and DWI alone (73 %) (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings indicated that although the combination of KS and ADC increased specificity and reduced unnecessary biopsies, the resulting decrease in sensitivity was unacceptable. Therefore, KS alone is superior to the KS-ADC combination in detecting malignancy in NME lesions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis 机器学习在诊断脊椎骨折中的价值:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111714

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) in detecting vertebral fractures, considering varying fracture classifications, patient populations, and imaging approaches.

Method

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 31, 2023, for studies using ML for vertebral fracture diagnosis. Bias risk was assessed using QUADAS-2. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed according to five task types (vertebral fractures, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures, differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral fractures, and prediction of vertebral fractures). Subgroup analyses were conducted by different ML models (including ML and DL) and modeling methods (including CT, X-ray, MRI, and clinical features).

Results

Eighty-one studies were included. ML demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.95 for vertebral fractures. Subgroup analysis showed that DL (SROC 0.98) and CT (SROC 0.98) performed best overall. For osteoporotic fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.96, with DL (SROC 0.99) and X-ray (SROC 0.99) performing better. For differentiating benign from malignant fractures, ML achieved a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with DL (SROC 0.96) and MRI (SROC 0.97) performing best. For differentiating acute from chronic vertebral fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with ML (SROC 0.96) and CT (SROC 0.97) performing best. For predicting vertebral fractures, ML had a sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.87, with ML (SROC 0.80) and clinical features (SROC 0.86) performing better.

Conclusions

ML, especially DL models applied to CT, MRI, and X-ray, shows high diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fractures. ML also effectively predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures, aiding in tailored prevention strategies. Further research and validation are required to confirm ML’s clinical efficacy.

目的:评估机器学习(ML)在检测椎体骨折方面的诊断准确性,同时考虑不同的骨折分类、患者人群和成像方法:截至 2023 年 12 月 31 日,通过检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science,对使用 ML 进行椎体骨折诊断的研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。使用 QUADAS-2 评估了偏倚风险。荟萃分析采用双变量混合效应模型。根据五种任务类型(椎体骨折、骨质疏松性椎体骨折、良性和恶性椎体骨折的鉴别、急性和慢性椎体骨折的鉴别以及椎体骨折的预测)进行荟萃分析。通过不同的ML模型(包括ML和DL)和建模方法(包括CT、X光、MRI和临床特征)进行了亚组分析:结果:共纳入 81 项研究。ML对椎体骨折的诊断灵敏度为0.91,特异性为0.95。亚组分析显示,DL(SROC 0.98)和 CT(SROC 0.98)的总体表现最佳。对于骨质疏松性骨折,ML 的灵敏度为 0.93,特异性为 0.96,DL(SROC 0.99)和 X 光(SROC 0.99)的表现更好。在区分良性和恶性骨折方面,ML 的灵敏度为 0.92,特异性为 0.93,其中 DL(SROC 0.96)和 MRI(SROC 0.97)表现最佳。在区分急性和慢性椎体骨折方面,ML 的灵敏度为 0.92,特异性为 0.93,其中 ML(SROC 0.96)和 CT(SROC 0.97)表现最佳。在预测脊椎骨折方面,ML 的灵敏度为 0.76,特异性为 0.87,其中 ML(SROC 0.80)和临床特征(SROC 0.86)的表现更好:结论:ML,尤其是应用于 CT、MRI 和 X 光片的 DL 模型,对椎体骨折的诊断准确性很高。ML还能有效预测骨质疏松性脊椎骨折,有助于制定有针对性的预防策略。要确认 ML 的临床疗效,还需要进一步的研究和验证。
{"title":"Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111714","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111714","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) in detecting vertebral fractures, considering varying fracture classifications, patient populations, and imaging approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 31, 2023, for studies using ML for vertebral fracture diagnosis. Bias risk was assessed using QUADAS-2. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed according to five task types (vertebral fractures, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures, differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral fractures, and prediction of vertebral fractures). Subgroup analyses were conducted by different ML models (including ML and DL) and modeling methods (including CT, X-ray, MRI, and clinical features).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-one studies were included. ML demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.95 for vertebral fractures. Subgroup analysis showed that DL (SROC 0.98) and CT (SROC 0.98) performed best overall. For osteoporotic fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.96, with DL (SROC 0.99) and X-ray (SROC 0.99) performing better. For differentiating benign from malignant fractures, ML achieved a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with DL (SROC 0.96) and MRI (SROC 0.97) performing best. For differentiating acute from chronic vertebral fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with ML (SROC 0.96) and CT (SROC 0.97) performing best. For predicting vertebral fractures, ML had a sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.87, with ML (SROC 0.80) and clinical features (SROC 0.86) performing better.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ML, especially DL models applied to CT, MRI, and X-ray, shows high diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fractures. ML also effectively predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures, aiding in tailored prevention strategies. Further research and validation are required to confirm ML’s clinical efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004303/pdfft?md5=f764b2ad4d25f2e6a6cc2fa1c1f5907e&pid=1-s2.0-S0720048X24004303-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative analysis of hepatic fat quantification across 5 T, 3 T and 1.5 T: A study on consistency and feasibility 5 T、3 T 和 1.5 T 肝脂肪定量对比分析:一致性和可行性研究
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111709

Objectives

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critical noninvasive technique for evaluating liver steatosis, with efficient and precise fat quantification being essential for diagnosing liver diseases. This study leverages 5 T ultra-high-field MRI to demonstrate the clinical significance of liver fat quantification, and explores the consistency and accuracy of the Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF) in the liver across different magnetic field strengths and measurement methodologies.

Methods

The study involved phantoms with lipid contents ranging from 0 % to 30 % and 35 participants (21 females, 14 males; average age 30.17 ± 13.98 years, body mass index 25.84 ± 4.76, waist-hip ratio 0.84 ± 0.09). PDFF measurements were conducted using chemical shift encoded (CSE) MRI at 5 T, 3 T, and 1.5 T, alongside magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 5 T and 1.5 T for both liver and phantoms, analyzed using jMRUI software. The MRS-derived PDFF values served as the reference standard. Repeatability of 5 T MRI measurements was assessed through correlation analysis, while accuracy was evaluated using linear regression analysis against the reference standards.

Results

The CSE-PDFF measurements at 5 T demonstrated strong consistency with those at 3 T and 1.5 T, showing high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.988 and 0.980, respectively (all p < 0.001). There was also significant consistency across ROIs within liver lobes, with ICC values ranging from 0.975 to 0.986 (all p < 0.001). MRS-PDFF measurements for both phantoms and liver at 5 T and 1.5 T exhibited substantial agreement, with ICC values of 0.996 and 0.980, respectively (all p < 0.001). Particularly, ICC values for ROIs in the liver ranged from 0.963 to 0.990 (all p < 0.001). Despite overall agreement, statistically significant differences were noted in specific ROIs within the liver lobes (p = 0.004 and 0.012). The CSE and MRS PDFF measurements at 5 T displayed strong consistency, with an ICC of 0.988 (p < 0.001), and significant agreement was also found between 5 T CSE and 1.5 T MRS PDFF measurements, with an ICC of 0.978 (p < 0.001). Agreement was significant within the ROIs of the liver lobes on the same platform at 5 T, with ICC values ranging from 0.986 to 0.991 (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion

PDFF measurements at 5 T MR imaging exhibited both accuracy and repeatability, indicating that 5 T imaging provides reliable quantification of liver fat content and shows substantial potential for clinical diagnostic applications.

目的磁共振成像(MRI)是评估肝脏脂肪变性的重要无创技术,高效、精确的脂肪定量是诊断肝脏疾病的关键。本研究利用 5 T 超高场磁共振成像来证明肝脏脂肪定量的临床意义,并探索不同磁场强度和测量方法下肝脏质子密度脂肪分数 (PDFF) 的一致性和准确性。 研究涉及脂肪含量从 0% 到 30% 的模型和 35 名参与者(21 名女性,14 名男性;平均年龄 30.17 ± 13.98 岁,体重指数 25.84 ± 4.76,腰臀比 0.84 ± 0.09)。使用 5 T、3 T 和 1.5 T 的化学位移编码 (CSE) MRI 以及 5 T 和 1.5 T 的磁共振波谱 (MRS) 对肝脏和模型进行了 PDFF 测量,并使用 jMRUI 软件进行了分析。MRS 导出的 PDFF 值作为参考标准。结果 5 T 的 CSE-PDFF 测量结果与 3 T 和 1.5 T 的测量结果具有很强的一致性,分别显示出 0.988 和 0.980 的高类内相关系数 (ICC)(所有 p 均为 0.001)。肝叶内各 ROI 之间的一致性也很明显,ICC 值从 0.975 到 0.986 不等(所有 p 均为 0.001)。在 5 T 和 1.5 T 条件下,模型和肝脏的 MRS-PDFF 测量结果显示出很大的一致性,ICC 值分别为 0.996 和 0.980(所有 p 均为 0.001)。尤其是肝脏 ROI 的 ICC 值介于 0.963 和 0.990 之间(所有 p 均为 0.001)。尽管总体上一致,但肝叶中特定 ROI 的统计学差异显著(p = 0.004 和 0.012)。5 T 的 CSE 和 MRS PDFF 测量显示出很强的一致性,ICC 为 0.988(p < 0.001),5 T CSE 和 1.5 T MRS PDFF 测量之间也有显著的一致性,ICC 为 0.978(p < 0.001)。结论 5 T MR 成像的 PDFF 测量具有准确性和可重复性,表明 5 T 成像可对肝脏脂肪含量进行可靠的量化,在临床诊断应用方面具有巨大潜力。
{"title":"Comparative analysis of hepatic fat quantification across 5 T, 3 T and 1.5 T: A study on consistency and feasibility","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111709","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111709","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critical noninvasive technique for evaluating liver steatosis, with efficient and precise fat quantification being essential for diagnosing liver diseases. This study leverages 5 T ultra-high-field MRI to demonstrate the clinical significance of liver fat quantification, and explores the consistency and accuracy of the Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF) in the liver across different magnetic field strengths and measurement methodologies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study involved phantoms with lipid contents ranging from 0 % to 30 % and 35 participants (21 females, 14 males; average age 30.17 ± 13.98 years, body mass index 25.84 ± 4.76, waist-hip ratio 0.84 ± 0.09). PDFF measurements were conducted using chemical shift encoded (CSE) MRI at 5 T, 3 T, and 1.5 T, alongside magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 5 T and 1.5 T for both liver and phantoms, analyzed using jMRUI software. The MRS-derived PDFF values served as the reference standard. Repeatability of 5 T MRI measurements was assessed through correlation analysis, while accuracy was evaluated using linear regression analysis against the reference standards.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CSE-PDFF measurements at 5 T demonstrated strong consistency with those at 3 T and 1.5 T, showing high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.988 and 0.980, respectively (all p &lt; 0.001). There was also significant consistency across ROIs within liver lobes, with ICC values ranging from 0.975 to 0.986 (all p &lt; 0.001). MRS-PDFF measurements for both phantoms and liver at 5 T and 1.5 T exhibited substantial agreement, with ICC values of 0.996 and 0.980, respectively (all p &lt; 0.001). Particularly, ICC values for ROIs in the liver ranged from 0.963 to 0.990 (all p &lt; 0.001). Despite overall agreement, statistically significant differences were noted in specific ROIs within the liver lobes (p = 0.004 and 0.012). The CSE and MRS PDFF measurements at 5 T displayed strong consistency, with an ICC of 0.988 (p &lt; 0.001), and significant agreement was also found between 5 T CSE and 1.5 T MRS PDFF measurements, with an ICC of 0.978 (p &lt; 0.001). Agreement was significant within the ROIs of the liver lobes on the same platform at 5 T, with ICC values ranging from 0.986 to 0.991 (all p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PDFF measurements at 5 T MR imaging exhibited both accuracy and repeatability, indicating that 5 T imaging provides reliable quantification of liver fat content and shows substantial potential for clinical diagnostic applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142117729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PSMA PET improves characterization of dural-based intracranial lesions in patients with metastatic prostate cancer PSMA PET 提高了转移性前列腺癌患者硬脑膜颅内病变的定性能力
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111711

Purpose

Theranostic approaches combining prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT or PET/MRI with PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy have improved clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) especially metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer. Dural metastases in PCa are rare but can pose a diagnostic challenge, as meningiomas, a more common dural based lesions have been shown to express PSMA. The aim of this study is to compare PSMA PET parameters between brain lesions classified as dural metastases and meningiomas in prostate cancer patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of PSMA PET/CT scans in patients with PCa and intracranial lesions was conducted. Brain lesions were categorized as dural metastases or meningiomas based on MRI characteristics, longitudinal follow-up, and histopathological characteristics. Standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of each brain lesion were measured, along with SUV ratio referencing parotid gland (SUVR). SUVs between lesions classified as metastases and meningiomas, respectively, were compared using Mann-Whitney-test. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using ROC analysis.

Results

26 male patients (median age: 76.5 years, range: 59–96 years) met inclusion criteria. A total of 44 lesions (7 meningiomas and 37 metastases) were analyzed. Median SUVmax and SUVR were significantly lower in meningiomas compared to metastases (SUVmax: 2.7 vs. 11.5, p = 0.001; SUVR: 0.26 vs. 1.05, p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated AUC 0.903; the optimal cut-off value for SUVR was 0.81 with 81.1 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity.

Conclusion

PSMA PET has the potential to differentiate meningiomas from dural-based metastases in patients with PCa, which can optimize clinical management and thus improve patient outcomes.

目的将前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)-PET/CT 或 PET/MRI 与 PSMA 靶向放射性核素治疗相结合的治疗方法改善了前列腺癌(PCa)患者,尤其是转移性阉割抗性前列腺癌患者的临床疗效。PCa 中的硬脑膜转移非常罕见,但却给诊断带来了挑战,因为脑膜瘤这种更常见的硬脑膜病变已被证实可表达 PSMA。本研究旨在比较前列腺癌患者硬脑膜转移瘤和脑膜瘤脑部病变的 PSMA PET 参数。根据磁共振成像特征、纵向随访和组织病理学特征将脑部病变分为硬脑膜转移瘤和脑膜瘤。测量了每个脑部病变的标准化摄取值(SUVmax)以及参考腮腺的SUV比值(SUVR)。使用曼-惠特尼检验比较了分别被归类为转移瘤和脑膜瘤的病变之间的 SUV 值。结果26名男性患者(中位年龄:76.5岁,范围:59-96岁)符合纳入标准。共分析了 44 个病灶(7 个脑膜瘤和 37 个转移瘤)。脑膜瘤的中位 SUVmax 和 SUVR 明显低于转移瘤(SUVmax:2.7 vs. 11.5,p = 0.001;SUVR:0.26 vs. 1.05,p <0.001)。ROC分析显示AUC为0.903;SUVR的最佳临界值为0.81,灵敏度为81.1%,特异度为100%。
{"title":"PSMA PET improves characterization of dural-based intracranial lesions in patients with metastatic prostate cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111711","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111711","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Theranostic approaches combining prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT or PET/MRI with PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy have improved clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) especially metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer. Dural metastases in PCa are rare but can pose a diagnostic challenge, as meningiomas, a more common dural based lesions have been shown to express PSMA. The aim of this study is to compare PSMA PET parameters between brain lesions classified as dural metastases and meningiomas in prostate cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of PSMA PET/CT scans in patients with PCa and intracranial lesions was conducted. Brain lesions were categorized as dural metastases or meningiomas based on MRI characteristics, longitudinal follow-up, and histopathological characteristics. Standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of each brain lesion were measured, along with SUV ratio referencing parotid gland (SUVR). SUVs between lesions classified as metastases and meningiomas, respectively, were compared using Mann-Whitney-test. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using ROC analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>26 male patients (median age: 76.5 years, range: 59–96 years) met inclusion criteria. A total of 44 lesions (7 meningiomas and 37 metastases) were analyzed. Median SUVmax and SUVR were significantly lower in meningiomas compared to metastases (SUVmax: 2.7 vs. 11.5, p = 0.001; SUVR: 0.26 vs. 1.05, p &lt; 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated AUC 0.903; the optimal cut-off value for SUVR was 0.81 with 81.1 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PSMA PET has the potential to differentiate meningiomas from dural-based metastases in patients with PCa, which can optimize clinical management and thus improve patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, dual-layer spectral-detector CT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases 对比增强 CT、双层光谱探测器 CT 和 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MR 在检测神经内分泌肿瘤肝转移方面的头对头比较。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111710

Purpose

To explore the optimal of kiloelectron voltage (keV) of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) of dual-layer spectral-detector CT (DLCT) in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) and to investigate diagnostic performance of polyenergetic images (PEI), DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR.

Methods

Seventy-two patients with suspected NETLM who underwent DLCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between PEI and VMI at 40–140 keV. Two radiologists read the CT examinations with and without VMI separately in consensus. Two other radiologists read the Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in consensus. The diagnostic performance was evaluated. Reference standard was histopathology, follow-up, and interpretation of all available imaging.

Results

The highest SNR and CNR were observed at VMI40keV, significantly higher than PEI in the arterial and venous phases (all P<0.01). A total of 477 lesions were identified (396 metastases, 81 benign lesions). Per-lesion AUC was 0.86, 0.91, and 0.97 (PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR, respectively). Sensitivity of PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were 0.76, 0.86, and 0.95, respectively. DLCT significantly improved sensitivity compared to PEI. MR had significantly higher sensitivity than DLCT and PEI. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the difference in diagnostic performance was concentrated on lesions < 10 mm.

Conclusion

The image quality of VMI40keV is higher than that of PEI. DLCT with VMI40keV provides better diagnostic sensitivity for NETLM detection than PEI. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR yielded the best diagnostic performance for NETLM detection.

目的:探讨双层光谱探测器 CT(DLCT)虚拟单能成像(VMI)千电子电压(keV)在检测神经内分泌肿瘤肝转移(NETLM)中的最佳值,并研究多能成像(PEI)、DLCT 和 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MR 的诊断性能:回顾性纳入72例接受DLCT和Gd-EOB-DTPA增强磁共振检查的疑似NETLM患者。在 40-140 keV 下比较了 PEI 和 VMI 的肿瘤信噪比(SNR)和对比度-信噪比(CNR)。两名放射科医生在协商一致的基础上分别阅读了有 VMI 和无 VMI 的 CT 检查结果。另外两名放射科医生在协商一致的基础上阅读了 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MR。对诊断效果进行了评估。参考标准是组织病理学、随访和所有可用成像的解释:结果:VMI40keV 的信噪比和有线信噪比最高,在动脉期和静脉期明显高于 PEI(所有 PC 结论:VMI40keV 的图像质量高于 PEI:VMI40keV 的图像质量高于 PEI。使用 VMI40keV 进行 DLCT 检测 NETLM 的诊断灵敏度高于 PEI。Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MR对检测NETLM的诊断效果最好。
{"title":"Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, dual-layer spectral-detector CT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111710","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111710","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore the optimal of kiloelectron voltage (keV) of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) of dual-layer spectral-detector CT (DLCT) in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) and to investigate diagnostic performance of polyenergetic images (PEI), DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventy-two patients with suspected NETLM who underwent DLCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between PEI and VMI at 40–140 keV. Two radiologists read the CT examinations with and without VMI separately in consensus. Two other radiologists read the Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in consensus. The diagnostic performance was evaluated. Reference standard was histopathology, follow-up, and interpretation of all available imaging.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The highest SNR and CNR were observed at VMI40<sub>keV</sub>, significantly higher than PEI in the arterial and venous phases (all <em>P</em>&lt;0.01). A total of 477 lesions were identified (396 metastases, 81 benign lesions). Per-lesion AUC was 0.86, 0.91, and 0.97 (PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR, respectively). Sensitivity of PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were 0.76, 0.86, and 0.95, respectively. DLCT significantly improved sensitivity compared to PEI. MR had significantly higher sensitivity than DLCT and PEI. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the difference in diagnostic performance was concentrated on lesions &lt; 10 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The image quality of VMI40<sub>keV</sub> is higher than that of PEI. DLCT with VMI40<sub>keV</sub> provides better diagnostic sensitivity for NETLM detection than PEI. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR yielded the best diagnostic performance for NETLM detection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond accuracy: Reproducibility must lead AI advances in radiology 超越准确性:可重复性必须引领放射学人工智能的进步
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111703
{"title":"Beyond accuracy: Reproducibility must lead AI advances in radiology","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111703","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111703","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142095415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2.5D deep learning based on multi-parameter MRI to differentiate primary lung cancer pathological subtypes in patients with brain metastases 基于多参数磁共振成像的 2.5D 深度学习区分脑转移患者的原发性肺癌病理亚型
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111712

Background

Brain metastases (BMs) represents a severe neurological complication stemming from cancers originating from various sources. It is a highly challenging clinical task to accurately distinguish the pathological subtypes of brain metastatic tumors from lung cancer (LC).The utility of 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) deep learning (DL) in distinguishing pathological subtypes of LC with BMs is yet to be determined.

Methods

A total of 250 patients were included in this retrospective study, divided in a 7:3 ratio into training set (N=175) and testing set (N=75). We devised a method to assemble a series of two-dimensional (2D) images by extracting adjacent slices from a central slice in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions to form a 2.5D dataset. Multi-Instance learning (MIL) is a weakly supervised learning method that organizes training instances into “bags” and provides labels for entire bags, with the purpose of learning a classifier based on the labeled positive and negative bags to predict the corresponding class for an unknown bag. Therefore, we employed MIL to construct a comprehensive 2.5D feature set. Then we used the single-slice as input for constructing the 2D model. DL features were extracted from these slices using the pre-trained ResNet101. All feature sets were inputted into the support vector machine (SVM) for evaluation. The diagnostic performance of the classification models were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation, with accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) metrics calculated for analysis.

Results

The optimal performance was obtained using the 2.5D DL model, which achieved the micro-AUC of 0.868 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.817–0.919) and accuracy of 0.836 in the test cohort. The 2D model achieved the micro-AUC of 0.836 (95 % CI, 0.778–0.894) and accuracy of 0.827 in the test cohort.

Conclusions

The proposed 2.5D DL model is feasible and effective in identifying pathological subtypes of BMs from lung cancer.

背景脑转移瘤(BMs)是源于各种癌症的严重神经并发症。这项回顾性研究共纳入了 250 例患者,按 7:3 的比例分为训练集(175 例)和测试集(75 例)。我们设计了一种方法,通过从中央切片中提取上下和前后方向的相邻切片来组合一系列二维(2D)图像,从而形成一个 2.5D 数据集。多实例学习(Multi-Instance Learning,MIL)是一种弱监督学习方法,它将训练实例组织成 "袋",并为整个袋提供标签,目的是根据已标记的正袋和负袋学习分类器,以预测未知袋的相应类别。因此,我们利用 MIL 构建了一个全面的 2.5D 特征集。然后,我们将单片作为构建 2D 模型的输入。使用预训练的 ResNet101 从这些切片中提取 DL 特征。所有特征集都输入支持向量机(SVM)进行评估。结果使用 2.5D DL 模型获得了最佳性能,该模型的微观 AUC 为 0.868(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.817-0.919),测试队列的准确率为 0.836。结论所提出的 2.5D DL 模型在鉴别肺癌骨髓病理亚型方面是可行且有效的。
{"title":"2.5D deep learning based on multi-parameter MRI to differentiate primary lung cancer pathological subtypes in patients with brain metastases","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111712","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111712","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Brain metastases (BMs) represents a severe neurological complication stemming from cancers originating from various sources. It is a highly challenging clinical task to accurately distinguish the pathological subtypes of brain metastatic tumors from lung cancer (LC).The utility of 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) deep learning (DL) in distinguishing pathological subtypes of LC with BMs is yet to be determined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 250 patients were included in this retrospective study, divided in a 7:3 ratio into training set (N=175) and testing set (N=75). We devised a method to assemble a series of two-dimensional (2D) images by extracting adjacent slices from a central slice in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions to form a 2.5D dataset. Multi-Instance learning (MIL) is a weakly supervised learning method that organizes training instances into “bags” and provides labels for entire bags, with the purpose of learning a classifier based on the labeled positive and negative bags to predict the corresponding class for an unknown bag. Therefore, we employed MIL to construct a comprehensive 2.5D feature set. Then we used the single-slice as input for constructing the 2D model. DL features were extracted from these slices using the pre-trained ResNet101. All feature sets were inputted into the support vector machine (SVM) for evaluation. The diagnostic performance of the classification models were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation, with accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) metrics calculated for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The optimal performance was obtained using the 2.5D DL model, which achieved the micro-AUC of 0.868 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.817–0.919) and accuracy of 0.836 in the test cohort. The 2D model achieved the micro-AUC of 0.836 (95 % CI, 0.778–0.894) and accuracy of 0.827 in the test cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The proposed 2.5D DL model is feasible and effective in identifying pathological subtypes of BMs from lung cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142117728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1