Purpose
To evaluate the image quality of three reconstruction methods—filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (AR50), and deep learning–based reconstruction (DL-M)—processed with the Smart Metal Artifact Reduction (SMAR) technique for post-embolization assessment of peripheral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).
Materials and methods
In this prospective single-center study, 30 patients who underwent coil embolization for AVM were included. Post-embolization CT angiography was performed using dual-energy CT. Virtual monoenergetic images at 50 and 70 keV were reconstructed using FBP, AR50, and DL-M. All were processed with SMAR, and DL-M without SMAR served as the baseline. Artifact severity was objectively assessed using the standard deviation (SD) around the AVM, artifact index (AI), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two readers (a resident and a staff radiologist) subjectively graded artifact severity, vessel visualization, and new artifacts using 4-point scales.
Results
At both energy levels, average SD and AI were significantly lower in SMAR-processed images than in baseline DL-M (all p < 0.001). Subjective scores for artifact reduction and visualization of adjacent vessels were also significantly improved (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences among the three SMAR-processed methods. New artifacts appeared in three cases but had minimal effect on interpretability.
Conclusions
SMAR-processed FBP, AR50, and DL-M reconstructions significantly reduced metal artifacts and improved visualization after AVM coil embolization, supporting their value for post-treatment evaluation and clinical decision-making.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
