European review for medical and pharmacological sciences最新文献

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as a bupivacaine adjuvant for caesarean section can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, the time interval to the first analgesic request, the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects, and the fetal outcomes.

Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The study compared the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (group BD) to the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine alone (group B) for cesarean sections.

Results: Fourteen publications were included. Among patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section, 514 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine alone, and 533 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine. The onset of sensory and motor block was essentially the same in both groups; the time for sensory and motor block regression was significantly longer in the BD group. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values were similar in group BD when compared to group B. Postoperative VAS scores remained consistently low in Group BD compared to Group B, starting from 1 hour after surgery. The level of sedation measured at the end of the cesarean section in both groups was almost similar. No difference in terms of safety, adverse events, and neonatal outcomes was found between the two groups.

Conclusions: Use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section significantly prolongs sensory and motor block compared to using bupivacaine alone as an adjuvant. It also improves analgesia after 1 hour with no difference in the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse effects compared to bupivacaine alone. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine to use remains to be ingested.

Objective: The study aimed to investigate the potential beneficial role of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hyaluronic acid (HA) combination formulation in socket healing after third molar surgery. Biomaterials, including mouthwash formulations, were hypothesized to contribute to improved socket healing and reduced post-operative complications.

Patients and methods: A triple-blinded parallel randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at a single-center dental hospital in Milan, Italy. The trial included 114 patients who underwent extraction of impacted, partially erupted, and completely erupted third molars. Patients were randomly assigned to three parallel groups: Group 1 (H2O2 and HA), Group 2 (placebo), and Group 3 (0.2% chlorhexidine). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (registration number NCT04438434). The main outcome measures included various parameters related to socket healing, such as pain, inflammation, swelling, plaque index, bleeding index, granulation tissue, suppuration, re-epithelialization, bleeding upon palpation, odor, and taste alteration. Patients were followed up for 7 days.

Results: All 114 enrolled patients completed the study, with no dropouts or loss to follow-up. The mean age of patients in the three groups differed (H2O2 and HA: 30.9±14.9; placebo: 27.6±13.1; 0.2% chlorhexidine: 23.05±10.16). Significant reductions (p<0.001) in visual analog scale (VAS) pain levels and other outcome measures were observed in the H2O2 and HA group compared to the placebo group. These findings suggest a positive effect of the H2O2 and HA combination on socket healing after the third molar surgery.

Conclusions: The study concludes that the combination of hydrogen peroxide and hyaluronic acid can be considered a potential mouthwash with beneficial effects on socket healing following third molar surgery. However, additional clinical trials are recommended to validate its effectiveness further and provide additional evidence supporting its use in clinical settings.

Clinicaltrial: gov: NCT04438434.

Objective: In today's industrialized world, between sixty and ninety percent of the working-age population experiences low back discomfort. Chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP), the most common ailment among working-age people in contemporary industrial society, causes a major economic burden due to the widespread use of medical services and the absence of work. For those suffering from persistent mechanical low back pain, this experiment aimed to assess the efficacy of using acupuncture dry needles in the short term.

Patients and methods: Our research included 30 individuals with nonspecific low back pain; their ages varied from 20 to 45. The participants were divided into two parallel groups using a random process: 15 individuals in group A had acupuncture treatment with a dry needle placed to specified locations on their backs, whereas 15 individuals in group B participated in muscle strengthening and stretching exercises. Both before and after therapy, researchers examined the lumbar range of motion (ROM) in four directions: flexion, extension, bilateral side bending, as well as pain intensity and functional impairment.

Results: We examined the data for normality and covariance homogeneity using the Shapiro-Wilk and Box's tests, respectively. The variables of interest that were investigated were compared across various test groups and measurement periods using a 2x2 mixed design-multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). We used a significance threshold of 0.05. When comparing the two groups after treatment, it was found that the flexion and extension range of motion increased significantly (p<0.05), while the pain intensity, bending to the right and left, and functional impairment decreased significantly (p<0.05). The results of multiple pairwise comparisons showed a noteworthy difference in pain severity, functional debility, and back ROM between the two groups before and after treatment (p<0.05), with group A showing an advantage over group B after treatment.

Conclusions: Based on the study results, dry needle acupuncture may be a beneficial modality in treating chronic mechanical low back pain by relieving pain intensity, improving functional debility, and improving ROM.

Objective: Colorectal cancer, one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide, has a high mortality rate. Thus, our research aims to examine the preventive effects of diosmin (DIO) alone and in conjunction with the anti-cancer drug irinotecan (camptothecin-11, CPT-11), on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH)-induced colon cancer (CC) in male Wistar rats.

Materials and methods: Fifty adult male Wistar rats were categorized into five groups. Group I (Normal) received saline 0.9 orally % as a vehicle once a week for 14 weeks. Group II (DMH) received DMH (20 mg/kg/week) orally dissolved in 0.9% saline for 14 weeks and 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) every other day for the final 10 weeks. Group III (DMH+DIO) received DMH orally for 14 weeks and DIO (10 mg/kg, suspended in 1% CMC) every other day for the final 10 weeks. Group IV (DMH+CPT-11) received DMH orally for 14 weeks and intraperitoneal injection of CPT-11 (3 mg/kg) twice a week for the final 10 weeks. Group V (DMH+DIO+CPT-11) orally received DMH for 14 weeks and both DIO and CPT-11.

Results: All treated groups showed a significant reduction (p<0.05) in their elevated serum malondialdehyde levels and significant amelioration (p<0.05) of their lowered activities of colon glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and glutathione reductase (GR) as well as serum glutathione level (GSH). In addition, simultaneous treatment with DIO and CPT-11 led to a significant decrease (p<0.05) in the elevated serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in rats administered with DMH, as well as a reduction in the colon expression levels of the inflammatory mediator (NF-κB), cell proliferator protein (Ki-67), and proapoptotic protein (p53).

Conclusions: These findings suggest DIO, CPT-11, and their combination have anticarcinogenic effects against DMH-induced CC by suppressing oxidative stress, simulating the antioxidant defense system, attenuating the inflammatory effects, and reducing cell proliferation.

The article "Regulation of miRNAs on c-met protein expression in ovarian cancer and its implication", by H. Liu, S.-R. Li, Q. Si, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017; 21 (15): 3353-3359-PMID: 28829508 has been retracted by the Editor in Chief. Following some concerns raised on PubPeer regarding a possible manipulation in Figure 5 (link: https://pubpeer.com/publications/7B6E6E6679990661654EBCAF472921), the Editor in Chief has started an investigation to assess the validity of the results as well as possible figure manipulation. The authors were informed about the journal's investigation but remained unresponsive and have not provided the manuscript's raw data. The journal's investigation revealed a figure overlap between panels pcDNA3.1-EGFP and pcDNA3.1-EGFP-204-up in Figure 5. Consequently, the Editor in Chief mistrusts the results presented and has decided to retract the article. This article has been retracted. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. https://www.europeanreview.org/article/13200.

Objective: The aim of this study was to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy (SLUCR).

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients with SLUCR in two hospitals from February 2020 to February 2022, including the MI-PCF group (n=40) and the ACDF group (n=41). The differences in neck and shoulder pain, visual analog score (VAS), upper limb radiating pain (VAS), and neck disability index (NDI) were compared. Operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and complications were also compared between the two groups.

Results: The degree of neck and shoulder pain relief at 1 day postoperatively was better in the ACDF group than in the MI-PCF group (p<0.05), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of neck and shoulder pain relief at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in the relief of upper limb radiating pain and the decrease of NDI scores between the two groups at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery (p>0.05). The patients in MI-PCF group had shorter operative time, less bleeding, and shorter hospital stay, which were statistically different (p<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the complication rate between the two groups, (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The clinical efficacy and safety of MI-PCF and ACDF in the treatment of SLUCR are satisfactory, meanwhile, MI-PCF has shorter operative time, less bleeding and shorter hospital stay than ACDF, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of the SYNTAX score (SS) calculated before percutaneous intervention on survival in a group of young patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Patients and methods: Our study is a retrospective study. Patients between the ages of 18 and 45 who applied to Private Yalova Atakent Hospital Cardiology Clinic with ACS and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between 01.01.2017 and 01.12.2023 were included in the study. Patients aged 45 and under who presented with acute syndrome and underwent coronary angiography were evaluated. Patients' history of major cardiac adverse events (MACE) was evaluated. Demographic characteristics, laboratory findings, echocardiographic parameters, and SS of the patients were recorded. SS was calculated from the coronary angiography images of the patients.

Results: 140 patients were included in the study. 70.0% (n=98) of the cases were diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STE-MI), 28.6% (n=40) with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-MI)-unstable angina pectoris (USAP), and 1.4% with cardiac arrest (n=2). 28.6% (n=40) of the patients had MACE. There was a statistically significant correlation between SS and MACE (r=0.525 p=0.001). An SS value of 23.15 had 77.5% sensitivity and 60.8% specificity in predicting MACE. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between SS and ejection fraction (EF) (r=-0.584, p=0.001). EF<40.5 predicted mortality with 77.7% sensitivity and 69.4% specificity (AUC 0.710, p=0.01, 95% CI 0.615-0.825).

Conclusions: SYNTAX Score and EF have predictive value in predicting MACE and mortality in young ACS patients. Different scoring systems are needed to predict MACE and mortality after ACS in young patients.

Objective: Viral infections are an important cause of exacerbation in bronchiectasis patients. We aimed to determine the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult bronchiectasis patients and whether there was a relationship between the clinical parameters and the COVID-19 infection.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective observational study, 547 bronchiectasis patients were included. Demographic characteristics, vaccination status, Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI), FACED and Reiff scores, and clinical and laboratory parameters during COVID-19 infection were evaluated.

Results: The median age was 56, and 49.2% of the patients were male. The COVID-19 infection rate was 27.6%. 431 (78.8%) patients had at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The patients were divided into two groups according to their COVID-19 infection status. Emergency admission was significantly higher in the COVID-19-infected group. There was no statistical difference with other clinical factors. The COVID-19-infected patients were divided into home treatment and hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) treatment groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding advanced age, male gender, presence of asthma, long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) and non-invasive mechanic ventilator (NIMV) usage, sputum culture positivity, BSI and FACED scores, and multiple laboratory parameters (ferritin, C-reactive protein, eosinophil). In logistic regression analysis, BSI was found as a risk factor [OR 1.252 (1.077-1.456), p=0.004] and eosinophilia as a protective factor [OR 0.986 (0.973-0.999), p=0.030] for hospital/ICU admission.

Conclusions: Frequent emergency visits might increase the risk of COVID-19 infection in bronchiectasis patients. BSI was found to be an independent risk factor, and blood eosinophilia could play a protective role in hospital/ICU admission for COVID-19 infection.

The article "Imipenem-resistance in Serratia marcescens is mediated by plasmid expression of KPC-2", by W.-Q. Su, Y.-Q. Zhu, N.-M. Deng, L. Li, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017; 21 (7): 1690- 1694-PMID: 28429335 has been retracted by the Editor in Chief. Following some concerns raised on PubPeer (link: https://pubpeer.com/publications/F7E91E2863540C7CB030B86E16917F), the Editor in Chief has started an investigation to assess the validity of the results as well as possible figure and data manipulation. The authors were informed about the journal's investigation but have remained unresponsive and have not provided the manuscript's raw data. Therefore, the validity of the overall results could not be verified. The journal's investigation revealed that Figures 2 and 3 have been computer-generated. Additionally, Figure 1 was duplicated from a previously published article. Moreover, several terminology inaccuracies were identified within the manuscript. Consequently, the Editor in Chief mistrusts the results presented and has decided to retract the article. This article has been retracted. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. https://www.europeanreview.org/article/12540.

The article "LINC01116 promotes the proliferation and inhibits the apoptosis of gastric cancer cells" by J. Chen, Z.-H. Yuan, X.-H. Hou, M.-H. Shi, R. Jiang, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 24 (4): 1807-1814-DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202002_20358-PMID: 32141549 has been retracted by the Editor in Chief. Following the journal's investigation, due to concerns raised regarding non-verifiable nucleotide sequences and cell lines used in the article, the editorial team has contacted the authors to provide a reply regarding the above-mentioned issues. The authors revealed that they suspected errors in the experimental process as early as 2021. After repeated literature reviews and reproducibility experiments, the authors still believe that the paper's conclusions are inaccurate and need further revision. Consequently, the Editor in Chief mistrusts the results presented and has decided to retract the article. This article has been retracted. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. https://www.europeanreview.org/article/20358.